Dr. Haruo Ozaki of the Tokyo Medical Association on Ivermectin: “It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

Why would a drug be blocked if it’s believed to cure an illness?

After researching some information on Japan’s recall of over 1.6 million doses of the Moderna vaccine due to possible metal contamination, I went investigating further and found some conflicting information involving Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Dr. Haruo Ozaki, and the Ivermectin situation.

Many websites are reporting that Dr. Haruo Ozaki came out in a press conference this month (August 2021) suggesting the use of Ivermectin in a now widely shared video.

However, this is incorrect. In actuality, Dr. Haruo Ozaki made this announcement in February 2021.

Here is the video with provided transcript thanks to the subtitles that were added:

If this video no longer exists, please let me know and I will find an alternative. Thank you.

“In Africa, if we compare countries distributing ivermectin once a year with countries which do not give ivermectin, I mean, they don’t give ivermectin to prevent COVID, but to prevent parasitic diseases. But anyway, if we look at COVID numbers in countries that give ivermectin, the number of cases is 134.4 per 100,000 and the number of death is 2.2 per 100,000. 

Now African countries which do not distribute Ivermectin: 950.6 cases per 100,000 and 29.3 deaths per 100,000.

I believe the difference is clear.

Of course, one cannot conclude that ivermectin is effective only on the basis of these figures, but when we have all these elements, we cannot say that ivermectin is absolutely not effective, at least not me.

We can do other studies to confirm its efficacy, but we are in a crisis situation. With regard to the use of ivermectin, it is obviously necessary to obtain the informed consent of the patients, and I think we’re in a situation where we can afford to give them this treatment.” – Dr. Haruo Ozaki

Now with that cleared up, I want to bring attention to a more recent report that did come out in August 2021 (allegedly), from a Japanese website: yomiuri.co.jp

The following will be a translated version using this service: translate.com
I have provided a copy/pasted format for search capabilities. Viewing would be easier in desktop/tablet mode. For those on mobile, the Japanese text will be shown first, followed by the translation in English. Please keep in mind that since this is using a translation website, there may be inaccuracies and missing context.

Lastly, I want to point out that I personally do not agree with every assessment made in the following account; such as, “there is a potent delta strain going around”, or so forth. I think these notions are embellished news stories to give the illusion that the virus is deadlier and harder to contain, just to push for a worldwide vaccine effort. However, there are still many intelligent/educated individuals who are not yet fully aware of this agenda, but are waking up to the realization that something is not right with the vaccine push and the suppression of actual treatments that are working against several known illnesses. If Ivermectin is acknowledged to be beneficial in combatting respiratory viruses, then it concludes that it could be helpful in treating coronaviruses that would also involve the common cold/flu/influenza/pneumonia/COVID/SARS, etc.

It therefore goes without saying, that a cheap, effective wonder drug capable of treating such illnesses and other known diseases would be a pharmaceutical’s worst nightmare that would ultimately hurt their own pockets as well as that of the medical/health industry, and any stakeholders who share in their profits.

So with that out of the way, here is a current, updated account of what the President of the Tokyo Medical Association has to say about Ivermectin. All quotes in italics are by Dr. Haruo Ozaki.

The below image is a screenshot of the first page of the Japanese website:

Screenshot taken from: yomiuri.co.jp
Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

「今こそイベルメクチンを使え」東京都医師会の尾崎治夫会長が語ったその効能

POINT
■イベルメクチンが新型コロナの予防にも治療にも効果があるという論文が相次いで発表されているが、すでに「使用国」とされている日本では使用が進んでいない。

■感染爆発が進む今こそ使用すべきだが、使おうにもイベルメクチンがない、政府の副作用被害救済制度の対象になっていないなどの課題がある。

■日本版EUAを早く整備して、現場の医師が使用できる体制になれば、自宅待機や療養の患者にも投与できる。政府は積極的に使用促進に取り組むべきだ。

“Use ivermectin now,” said Haruo Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Medical Association

POINT
A series of papers have been published that ivermectin is effective in preventing and treating the new corona, but its use has not progressed in Japan, which is already considered a “country of use”.

■ It should be used only now when the infection explosion progresses, but there are issues such as the absence of ivermectin even if it is used, and the fact that it is not subject to the government’s side effect damage relief system.

■ If the Japanese version of EUA is developed as soon as possible so that doctors in the field can use it, it can be administered to patients who are staying at home or recuperating. The government should actively promote its use.

東京オリンピックの開催中にインドを起源とするデルタ株が猛威を振るい、感染者の拡大が続いている。副作用の報告がほとんどなく、諸外国の臨床試験で効果が報告されているイベルメクチンを日本はなぜ使おうとしないのか。早くからイベルメクチンの有効な使用法を提言してきた東京都医師会の尾崎会長に8月5日、緊急インタビューした。
聞き手・構成 認定NPO法人・21世紀構想研究会理事長
科学ジャーナリスト 馬場錬成

During the Tokyo Olympics, delta strains originating in India are raging and the spread of infected people continues. Why does Japan not try to use ivermectin, which has been reported to be effective in clinical trials in other countries with few reports of side effects?

On August 5, I interviewed Mr. Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association, who had been proposing effective use of ivermectin from an early age.

Listening and Composition President, 21st Century Conception Society, Certified NPO Science Journalist Rensei Baba

まだ見えない感染拡大のピーク

――第5波ともいわれる今回の爆発的な感染拡大は、まだ右肩上がりが続いているようです。自宅待機・療養者が急増していますが、東京都医師会はどのように対応していますか。

「1月の第3波で自宅待機、療養の人が急増したとき、これではダメだということになって、24時間支援を目標に東京都と東京都医師会が一緒になって体制構築に取り組み、47地区医師会のうち37まで対応できるまでになりました。ところが、毎日1000人を超える自宅療養者が積みあがる今の状況は、限界を超えています。診療所の医師は、一般診療、ワクチン接種、健康診断、往診などで手が回らない。いま、保健所が入院調整をしています。東京都には入院調整センターもありますが、急変したコロナ患者を迅速に受け入れて治療できる体制が確立されるところまではいっていません」

The peak of the spread of infection that has not yet been seen

―― This explosive spread, also known as the fifth wave, seems to be still rising. The number of people staying at home and recuperating is increasing rapidly, but how is the Tokyo Medical Association responding?

“When the number of people staying at home and recuperating increased rapidly in the third wave in January, this was not enough, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the Tokyo Medical Association worked together to build a system with the goal of 24-hour support, and we were able to respond to up to 37 of the 47 district medical associations. However, the current situation where more than 1,000 home care persons are accumulated every day is over the limit. Doctors at clinics are available for general medical care, vaccinations, medical examinations, house contacts, etc. The public health center is adjusting hospitalization now. There is also an inpatient coordination center in Tokyo, but we are not well into establishing a system that can quickly accept and treat corona patients who have suddenly changed.”

多くの臨床試験結果は「予防にも治療にも効果」

――これまで世界で発表されているイベルメクチンの臨床試験の論文を読むと、予防にも治療にも効いている例が多数出ています。

「中南米、アジアなどを中心にイベルメクチンがコロナの予防・治療に効いているという論文が多数出ていることは承知しています。次々と発症する患者の対応に迫られるが有効な治療薬もない。ワクチンは間に合わない。そういう差し迫ったときに、イベルメクチンがコロナに効いているという論文が出ているのだから、これを使ってみようと思うのは臨床医としては当たり前の対応です。医師主導の臨床試験論文が多数出てきたのは、そういう事情があったからです」

Many clinical trial results are “effective for prevention and treatment”

―― Reading the papers of ivermectin clinical trials published around the world, there are many cases that are effective in prevention and treatment.

I am aware that there are many papers that ivermectin is effective in preventing and treating corona, mainly in Latin America and Asia. There is no effective treatment which is pressed for the correspondence of the patient who develops one after another either. The vaccine will not be in time. It is a natural correspondence as a clinician to think that this is used because the thesis that ivermectin works for the corona has come out at such an imminent time. That’s why so many doctor-led clinical trial papers came out.”

――普通は製薬企業が大がかりな臨床試験をして効果を見るのですが、イベルメクチンはオンコセルカ症(河川盲目症)、リンパ系フィラリア症などの熱帯病の特効薬として、世界保健機関(WHO)をはじめ世界中の国々が20年以上前に承認した薬剤です。新型コロナにも効果があるなら適応外だがパンデミックの中で使用しよう、ということになったのはやむを得ないということですね。

 「そうです。パンデミックの医療現場は戦場です。野戦病院と同じです。患者が運び込まれ次々と容態が悪化して亡くなっていく。そのとき副作用もほとんどなく、コロナにも効くという論文が多数出てきたので、これにすがりつくようにして投与する医師の気持ちはよく分かります」

――Usually, pharmaceutical companies conduct large-sized clinical trials to see its effects, but ivermectin is a drug approved more than 20 years ago by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other countries around the world as a special effect of tropical diseases such as oncocelacia (river blindness) and lymphatic filariasis. If the new corona is also effective, it is not adaptable, but it is no use in a pandemic.

“That’s right. The medical field of the pandemic is a battlefield. It is the same as the field hospital. The patient is carried in, and the condition deteriorates one after another and it dies. At that time, there were few side effects, and many papers came out that it works for corona, so I understand the feelings of the doctor who administers it by following this.”

「つい先日、インドでコロナ感染症の治療ガイドラインを決めている全インド医科大学(All India Institute of Medical Sciences/AIIMS)の研究グループが、イベルメクチンの予防効果を調べた論文を発表しています。それによると、約3900人の医療従事者(職員及び学生)を対象に、イベルメクチン体重1キロ当たり0.3ミリ・グラムを3日間隔で2回投与した群、1回のみ投与した群、そして投与しなかった群の三つの群に分けて臨床試験を行った結果、イベルメクチンを2回投与された人は、新型コロナ感染が83%減少したというのです。論文を発表したのは世界でも第一級の研究グループですから、非常に信頼性が高いものです」

“Just recently, a research group from the All Institute of Medical Sciences/AIIMS, which has set guidelines for treating coronal infections in India, published a paper examining the preventive effects of ivermectin. According to the study, about 3,900 healthcare professionals (staff and students) were given 0.3 milligrams per kilo of ivermectin weight twice every three days, administered only once, and in three groups that did not, and those who were given ivermectin twice had an 83% reduction in new corona infections. It’s a very reliable research group because it’s one of the first-class research groups in the world to publish a paper.”

日本はすでに使用国に区分け

――日本では2020年5月18日に通達した「新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)診療の手引き第2版」から、イベルメクチンをCOVID-19治療に使用することを認めています。世界でも、日本はイベルメクチンの使用国に区分けされています。

「日本では以前から皮膚病の 疥癬 などに、『ストロメクトール』という商品名でイベルメクチンが適応薬として承認されており、改定手引きでは、『適応外』として新型コロナの治療にも承認する通達を出しています。適応外とは、医師と患者の判断で使用してもいいということです。通達を出したころまでに、世界では27か国、36件の臨床試験が行われており、イベルメクチンが予防・治療に効果が出ていると報告されていました。だから厚生労働省も適応外を認めたのです。効果がないと出ていたら通達は出さないでしょう」

Japan has already been classified as a country of use

―― Japan has admitted to using ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment from the “New Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) Medical Care Guidelines 2nd Edition” announced on May 18, 2020. In the world, Japan is classified as a country where ivermectin is used.

“In Japan, ivermectin has been approved as an indication drug under the product name ‘stromectol’ for scabies for skin diseases, etc., and in the revised guidelines, we have issued a public order to approve the treatment of the new corona as ‘not adapted’.

It is not indication and can be used at the judgment of the doctor and the patient. By the time of the report, 36 clinical trials had been conducted in 27 countries around the world, and it was reported that ivermectin was effective in prevention and treatment. Therefore, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare also admitted the outside adaptation. If it was ineffective, I wouldn’t get a good by it.”

政府は使用に前向きな国会答弁、しかし…

――国会でも政府はイベルメクチンの使用を進めるような答弁をしています。

「さる2月17日の衆議院予算委員会で、立憲民主党の中島克仁議員がイベルメクチンについて、『国として早期にコロナの治療薬として承認できるように治験に最大限のバックアップをすべきである』との提案を行いました。田村厚生労働大臣は『適応外使用では今でも使用できる。医療機関で服用して自宅待機するという使用法もある』と答弁しています。菅首相は『日本にとって極めて重要な医薬品であると思っているので、最大限努力する』と答弁し、積極的な取り組みを示すような発言でした。しかし現実には(取り組みは)できていません」

The government has responded positively to the use of the Diet, but…

――the government has also responded to the Diet to advance the use of ivermectin.

“At the House of Representatives Budget Committee meeting on February 17, Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, proposed that Ivermectin should be backed up to the clinical trial to be approved as a treatment for corona at an early date. Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura said, “It can still be used for use outside of adaptation. There is also a usage of taking it at a medical institution and staying at home.”

Prime Minister Kan responded, “I believe it is an extremely important drug for Japan, so I will do my utmost,” and made a statement that indicated his proactive efforts. But in reality, we’re not working on it.”

――なぜ、できないのでしょうか?

「私たちも、日本の承認薬を供給する企業とその先にあるアメリカのメルク社がどういう供給体制にあるのか調べました。メルク社は治療薬を開発中であるせいか、イベルメクチンは新型コロナの治療・予防には効かないという見解で、疥癬などの皮膚病以外に使わせないとの意向が働いている。つまり、新型コロナに使うといっても、実際にはメルクが出さなければ国内のイベルメクチン供給には結びつかない。医師がイベルメクチンの処方を書いても、薬局には薬剤がない。これでは事実上使えないことになります」

「しかし、(メルクは)イベルメクチンは効かないと言っているのだから、何も供給を制限する必要はないはずです。効かないなら需要がないのですから。効くと信じているから供給をブロックしているように見えてしまいます」

――Why can’t you do it?

“We also looked at the supply structure of japanese companies that supply approved drugs and merck in the U.S. beyond. Perhaps because Merck is developing therapeutic drugs, the company believes that ivermectin is not effective in treating and preventing the new corona, and the intention is not to use it for anything other than skin diseases such as scabies. In other words, even if it is used for the new corona, it will not actually lead to the supply of ivermectin in Japan if Merck does not put it out. Even if the doctor writes a prescription for ivermectin, the pharmacy does not have the drug. This makes it virtually inable.”

“But [Merck] says ivermectin doesn’t work, so there shouldn’t be any need to limit the supply. If it doesn’t work, there’s no demand. It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

ジェネリックも普及しない理由は

――イベルメクチンのジェネリック薬品は中国、インドなどでも大量に製造されています。メルクが出さないなら、それを輸入して供給する手段もあるはずです。

「そうです。医師でもある中島議員が中心になって衆議院に提出した『新型インフルエンザ等治療用特定医薬品の指定及び使用に関する特別措置法案』(日本版EUA*整備法案)が成立すれば、ジェネリック製剤も使用できるようになります。しかし、現時点では政府は全く動いていないのではないでしょうか」

Why are generics not popular?

――Ivermectin’s generics are manufactured in large quantities in China, India, and other countries. If Merck doesn’t, there should also be a way to import and supply it.

“Yes, if the “Special Measures Bill on the Designation and Use of Specified Drugs for Treatment of New Influenza” (Japanese version of the EUA* Maintenance Bill) submitted to the House of Representatives, mainly by Mr. Nakajima, who is also a doctor, is enacted, generic formulations will also be available. But at the moment, the government is not moving at all.

「もう一つの問題は、イベルメクチンがすでに世界の多くの国で使われ、用法や用量、安全性・有効性などが確認されているのに、日本ではまだ臨床試験段階でそうはなっていない、ということです。このため、イベルメクチンは医薬品副作用の被害救済制度の対象になっていません。これでは医師は使いにくい。しかし、そういう不安と不利な状況の中でも、イベルメクチンの効果を確信している医師たちの中には、自らの責任でイベルメクチンを処方している医師が出てきています。私は日本版EUA整備法を早く成立させてほしいと願っています」

*EUA(Emergency Use Authorization)緊急時に未承認薬などの使用を許可したり、既承認薬の適応を拡大したりする米食品医薬品局(FDA)の制度。FDAが<1>生命を脅かす疾患である<2>疾患の治療などで一定の有効性が認められる<3>使用した際のメリットが、製品の潜在的なリスクを上回る<4>ほかに疾患を診断、予防、または治療する適当な代替品がない――という条件を満たすと判断した場合に使用が認められる。

“Another problem is that ivermectin has already been used in many countries around the world, and although usage, dosage, safety and efficacy have been confirmed, it has not yet been done in Japan during the clinical trial phase. For this reason, ivermectin is not subject to the drug side effect damage relief system. This makes it difficult for doctors to use it. However, even in such anxiety and adverse situations, some doctors who are convinced of the effect of ivermectin are prescribing ivermectin at their own responsibility. I hope that the Japanese version of the EUA Development Act will be enacted as soon as possible.”

*Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) system that allows the use of unappreciated drugs in emergencies and expands the indication of approved drugs. It is found to be used when the FDA determines that <1> the benefits of using <3>, which have certain efficacy in treating life-threatening diseases< <2> diseases, etc., outweigh the potential risks of the product <4> and are found to meet the condition that there is no suitable alternative to diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease.

[NOTE FROM E.A.R.: Not sure why when translating that the numbers 2 and 3 got reversed…]

筆者のインタビューに応じる尾崎会長(右) / Chairman Ozaki (right) who responds to an interview with the author
使用国なのに現実には使えない

――適応外を認めたので、世界では日本は「イベルメクチン使用国」に区分けされていますが、現実には使えない体制になっているということですね。

「その通りです。要するに政府はイベルメクチンを供給できる体制も構築せずにいるわけで、推進体制にはなっていない。日本版EUAを早く整備して、現場の医師が使用できる体制になれば、田村厚労大臣が国会で答弁したように、現実的に自宅待機、療養の患者さんにも投与できるわけですが、いまの体制では事実上何もできません。よく『国民の安全のため』と言いますが、このような有事の際にも慎重姿勢を崩さないのでは、国民の安全を犠牲にしているとしか理解のしようがありません」

Even if it is a country of use, it cannot be used in reality.

―― Because it admitted not to adapt, Japan is classified as a “country using ivermectin” in the world, but it is a system that can not be used in reality.

“That’s it. In short, the government does not build a system that can supply ivermectin, so it has not been promoted. If the Japanese version of EUA is developed early and becomes a system that doctors on site can use, it can be administered to patients who are practically staying at home and recuperating, as Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura answered in the Diet, but virtually nothing can be done with the current system. I often say ‘for the safety of the people’, but if you don’t lose your cautious attitude in the event of such an event, you can only understand that it is at the expense of the safety of the people.”

自ら手を出さない学術現場や研究者

――日本の問題点はほかにもないでしょうか。

「イベルメクチンは大村智博士が発見してノーベル賞までいただいた薬剤です。コロナに本当に効いているかどうか日本が世界に先駆けて取り組む実行力があるべきです。WHOやアメリカの国立衛生研究所(NIH)がコロナへの効果が未確定だとの見解を取り続けていますが、パンデミックの中でこれだけ世界中でイベルメクチンが使われているのですから、科学的なエビデンス(証拠)を得られる臨床試験を国が主導して行い、客観的で納得できるような結論を示せば、日本の研究水準のアップにもつながります」

Academic sites and researchers who do not take their own hands

―― Are there any other problems in Japan?

“Ivermectin is a drug discovered by Dr. Satoshi Omura and received the Nobel Prize. Japan should be the first in the world to be effective in whether corona is really working or not. WHO and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) continue to take the view that the effect on corona is indeterminate, but since ivermectin is used all over the world during the pandemic, if the government conducts clinical trials that can obtain scientific evidence and present objective and convincing conclusions, it will lead to an increase in the level of research in Japan.”

「南米、アジアなどでイベルメクチンがコロナに効いているという結果をアメリカの臨床医師たちのグループ(FLCCC)が発表し、イギリスのイベルメクチン推奨団体(BIRD)などの医師グループは、多くの論文を総合的に分析したメタ解析から『効果あり』を確信し、世界中の医療現場にイベルメクチンを推奨しています。日本オリンピック委員会にも、東京オリンピックの開催にあたってイベルメクチンの有効使用をすべきだと伝えてきましたが、政府は何も対応しませんでした」

 「学術現場の研究者や大学の先生にも問題があります。自らは何もやらないで、WHOのような国際機関や欧米の大きな保健機関が出した『イベルメクチンはコロナに効くかどうかは未確定』という見解を自分たちの見解にしている人が多い。主体的にやらないで、人の意見だけで動いています。どうしてイベルメクチンが効くか効かないか、自分たちで確かめてやろうという気にならないのか。やりもしないで批判ばかりしている評論家や研究者・学者がいるのは嘆かわしいことです。日本のアカデミアはもっと積極的に貢献してほしいと思います」

“A group of Clinical Physicians in the United States (FLCCC) has published the results of ivermectin’s effects on corona in South America, Asia, and other countries, and physician groups such as the Ivermectin Recommended Organization (BIRD) in the United Kingdom are convinced that it is ‘effective’ from a meta-analysis that comprehensively analyzes many papers, and recommends ivermectin to medical settings around the world. The Japanese Olympic Committee has also told us that ivermectin should be used effectively to host the Tokyo Olympics, but the government has not responded to anything.

“There are also problems with academic researchers and university teachers. Many people do not do anything, but take their own view of the view that “whether ivermectin works for corona is indeterminate” issued by international organizations such as WHO and large health organizations in Europe and the United States. Don’t be proactive, we’re moving only on people’s opinions. Why doesn’t we feel like we’re going to see if ivermectin works or not? It is deplorable that there are critics, researchers, and scholars who are criticizing without doing anything. I hope academia in Japan will contribute more actively.”

都医師会は「使用に取り組みたい」

――日本でもようやく、製薬企業大手の興和(コーワ)が主体になった臨床試験が予定されています。どのように対応しますか。

「東京都も医師会もこの臨床試験を積極的に支援・協力する方針です。協力する医療機関などを積極的に探して提供することにしました。外国が開発したワクチンや治療薬に頼っている国ではどうしようもない。自分たちでイベルメクチンのデータをきちんと出し、日本発として重症化や死亡の減少につながる貢献を目指すことがわれわれのやるべきことです」

The Tokyo Medical Association wants to work on its use

— Clinical trials are finally scheduled in Japan led by Kowa, a leading pharmaceutical company. How do you respond?

“The Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the Medical Association will actively support and cooperate in this clinical trial. We have actively searched for and provided medical institutions to cooperate with. We can’t help it in countries that rely on vaccines and therapeutics developed by foreign countries. We need to properly provide ivermectin data ourselves and aim to contribute to the reduction of serious diseases and deaths from Japan.”

――コロナ・パンデミックの体験から日本の医療制度が学ぶべきことは。

「日本の国民皆保険制度のもとで、今回のようなパンデミック有事のときの対応は厳しいことがはっきりしました。民間医療施設は稼働率を精いっぱい高めて効率を上げることで経営しています。そういう中では、今回のように『急激に感染者が増えたから対応せよ』と言われても極めて難しいのです」

「対応策の一例をあげれば、公的医療機関・病院などで1000床くらいの空きベッドを持つ病院を建て、ふだんは研究施設や医師、看護師、検査技師らの研修や訓練機関として運用し、パンデミックが発生した際には医療機関として活用する、という方法があります。スキルを磨いて人材を養成し、パンデミック発生時には育成した人材も投入できる体制にするのです。運用方法を具体化するには課題もあると思いますが、今後、検討・研究すべきだと思います」

――What should the Japanese health care system learn from the corona pandemic experience?

“Under Japan’s national health insurance system, it has become clear that the response in the event of such a pandemic is severe. Private medical facilities are run by increasing the utilization rate to the maximum and increasing efficiency. In such a situation, it is extremely difficult to say that “respond because the number of infected people has increased rapidly” as this time.”

“If you give an example of countermeasures, we will build a hospital with about 1,000 vacant beds in public medical institutions and hospitals, usually operate it as a training and training organization for research facilities, doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians, etc., and use it as a medical institution in the event of a pandemic.  There is a method. We will develop human resources by honing our skills, and in the event of a pandemic, we will be able to bring in the human resources we have developed. I think there are issues to materialize the operation method, but I think we should consider and research it in the future.”

インタビューを終えて

使用に慎重なWHOへの反発も

デルタ株(インド変異株)が、日本の感染者のほぼすべてに置き換わろうとしている状況下で、新型コロナの新規感染者数が日々、過去最高を更新している。

都内の自宅療養者は2万人を超え、全国では7万人を超えている。医師でもある中島克仁衆議院議員は「抗体カクテル療法は有効だが、確保量と体制整備に課題がある。コロナ患者の重症化を防ぐため、早期治療の選択肢を広げることが必要だ」と強調する。その選択肢のひとつがイベルメクチンの投与――というのが尾崎会長を強く動かしていると感じた。

After the interview

There is also a backlash against WHO is cautious about its use.

With Delta (India Mutant) about to replace nearly all of Japan’s infected people, the number of new corona infections is hitting a record high every day.

There are more than 20,000 home recuperators in Tokyo and more than 70,000 nationwide. Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the House of Representatives who is also a doctor, said, “Antibody cocktail therapy is effective, but there are issues in securing the amount and the system. In order to prevent corona patients from becoming more severe, we need to expand our options for early treatment.” I felt that one of the options was the administration of ivermectin, which strongly moved Chairman Ozaki.

コロナ治療・予防へのイベルメクチンの評価はまだ固まっていない。WHOやNIHなど、世界のメジャーな保健機関は、「世界中の科学者を納得させるだけのエビデンスを示した臨床試験結果は出ていない」という見解を維持している。しかし、「これらの主張は根拠が薄い」と反論する医師グループが米英に多数出てきているのも事実だ。

 重症化して死に至る人も出る中で、世界中の医療現場では日夜、医師たちが懸命に治療に取り組んでいる。感染急拡大期のインドの医療現場は、まさに戦場だった。治療薬も治療機器類も十分でない医療現場では、新型コロナに効いているとの多数の論文を頼りにイベルメクチンが投与され、大きな効果を上げる例が多数出た。

The evaluation of ivermectin for coronal treatment and prevention has not yet been solidified. The world’s major health organizations, such as the WHO and NIH, maintain the view that “no clinical trial results have shown enough evidence to convince scientists around the world.” However, it is also true that a large number of doctor groups have come out in the United States and Britain to counter that “these claims are unfounded”.

Doctors are working hard day and night in medical situations around the world as some people die from serious each other. India’s medical scene during the rapid spread of infection was truly a battleground. In medical sites where there are not enough therapeutic agents and treatment equipment, ivermectin was administered relying on a number of papers that said it was effective for the new corona, and there were many cases that raised a large effect.

インド弁護士会は、WHOがイベルメクチンを治療使用に推奨しないとしているのは「患者を見殺しにする殺人罪に等しい」と激しく批判した文書を作り、テドロス事務局長や主任サイエンティストに送り、その文書を世界に向けて公表している。

イベルメクチンの効果ありとする医師団体がアメリカのFLCCCとイギリスのBIRDである。FLCCCは、世界の613人の科学者(医師・研究者)が2万6398人を対象に行った63件の臨床試験のメタ分析(8月15日現在)の結果をまとめ、以下のように判定している。

▽14件の予防試験において86%の予防効果
▽27件の初期症状治療試験において73%の改善効果
▽22件の重症治療試験において40%の改善効果
▽25件の臨床試験において61%の死亡率低下

 メタ解析した約半数の31件が、世界の臨床試験標準とされ、エビデンスを重視するランダム化比較試験(RCT)であり、ここで60%の改善効果が出ている。尾崎会長は、これを信じて治療にイベルメクチンを使おうとする臨床医がいてもおかしくない、との見解を示している。

The Indian Bar Association has made a document that sharply criticized the WHO’s [indemnity] in its insumping ivermectin for therapeutic use, “equal to murder charges that kill patients,” and sent it to Director-General Tedros and its chief scientist, who published the document to the world.

The doctors’ organizations that have the effect of ivermectin are FLCCC in the United States and BIRD in The United Kingdom.The FLCCC compiled the results of a meta-analysis (as of August 15) of 63 clinical trials conducted by 613 scientists (physicians and researchers) around the world in 26,398 people, and determined as follows:

86% preventive effect in 14 preventive trials , 73% improvement in 27 initial symptom treatment trials , 40% improvement in 22 severe treatment trials – 61% mortality rate decrease in 25 clinical trials

About half of the 31 meta-analyses are global clinical trial standards, and evidence-focused randomized trials (RCTs) have a 60% improvement. Chairman Ozaki shows the opinion that there is a clinician who believes this and tries to use Ivermectin for treatment.

イベルメクチンを否定する主張も根強い

 一方で、コロナ治療・予防にイベルメクチンを使うことに疑問を呈したり、反対する声が根強くあることは事実だ。筆者はイベルメクチン効果なしとする論文を3本読んだが、うち2本は研究者から臨床試験の方法に間違いがあると指摘されたものだ。それ以外に効果なしとする論文はないのではないか。

 確かに、「効果あり」としたエジプトの医師グループの論文が、データが 捏造 された疑いがあると指摘されて撤回されるといった事例もあった。しかし、前述の通り、イベルメクチンが新型コロナに効果ありとする論文の方が圧倒的に多い事実は揺るがない。イベルメクチンには副作用もほとんどなく、ジェネリックが行き渡っていて価格も安い。使ってみようという考えは無謀とはいえない。使用を否定することは、パンデミックへの対応策をつぶすことになりかねないのではないか。

While there are persistent claims that ivermectin is denied, it is true that there are persistent voices questioning or opposing the use of ivermectin for coronal treatment and prevention. I have read three papers that have no ivermectin effect, two of which were pointed out by researchers as erring in the way clinical trials are conducted. There might be no thesis which does not have the effect other than that. 

Indeed, there were cases where papers by egyptian doctors who said they were “effective” were withdrawn because they were pointed out that the data was suspected to have been fabricated. However, as mentioned above, the fact that there are overwhelmingly more papers that Ivermectin is effective for the new corona is unwavering. Ivermectin has few side effects, generics are all over the place, and the price is low. The idea of using it is not reckless. Denying its use could crush responses to pandemics.

日本版EUA法案成立に期待

田村厚生労働大臣は、国会で「適応外使用では今でも使用できる。医療機関で(イベルメクチンを)服用して自宅待機するという使用法もある」と答弁している。これが簡単にできるなら、東京都医師会はわざわざ「イベルメクチンを使用すべきだ」と主張する必要はないはずだ。

尾崎会長は「適応外使用では、副作用などで健康被害があっても救済制度の対象にはならないし、第一、処方してもモノがない」と語っている。ジェネリック製剤が使えるようにならない限り、イベルメクチンは現実的には「いつまでも使えない薬」であり続けてしまう。

その壁を越えるのが、医師でもある立憲民主党の中島克仁衆議院議員らが国会に提出した「日本版EUA整備法案」の成立だ。しかしいま、国会の休会で棚ざらしになったままだ。

Japan’s eua bill is expected to be enacted, and Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Tamura told the Diet, “It can still be used for use outside of adaptation. There is also a use to take (ivermectin) at a medical institution and stay at home. “If this is easy to do, the Tokyo Medical Association should not have to insist that Ivermectin should be used. 

Chairman Ozaki says, “In non-adaptive use, even if there is a health hazard due to side effects, etc., it is not subject to the relief system, and first, there is no thing even if it prescribes it”. Unless generic formulations become possible, ivermectin will realistically continue to be a “drug that cannot be used forever.” 

Beyond that barrier is the enactment of the “Japanese version of the EUA Development Bill”, which was submitted to the Diet by Katsuhito Nakajima, a member of the House of Representatives of the Constitutional Democratic Party, who is also a doctor. However, it remains shelved by the holiday of the Diet now.

筆頭提案者の中島議員は「この法案を成立させれば、すべて解決します」と言う。疥癬治療薬のイベルメクチンがコロナ治療に使えるようになり、ジェネリック製剤の使用にも道が開け、副作用などの健康被害は救済できるようになる。これなら医師は積極的に処方するようになるだろう、と考えているのだ。

 日本国民全体に対するワクチン接種率は、1回目が約50%、2回目はまだ40%にも届いていない。国内で最大の地域人口を抱える東京都医師会の尾崎会長の最大の懸念は、重症患者を受け入れる医療施設の 逼迫 と、自宅療養者らが重症化して病態が急変することへの対応策だ。尾崎会長の言葉には、緊急にイベルメクチンを使えるようにするしかないという危機感がこもっていた。

 日本で発見されたイベルメクチンは、コロナ・パンデミックの「救世主」となる可能性を秘めている。これまでの世界の臨床試験報告を見ても、全く効かないということはあり得ない。インドをはじめ多くの国が、緊急的にイベルメクチンを投与して感染拡大を抑え込んだ実績がある。緊急時のいま、コロナ感染に使用することに 躊躇 する理由は見当たらない。私はイベルメクチンの活用は、決して「賭け」ではないと確信している。

Mr. Nakajima, the lead proponent, said, “If we pass this bill, we will solve everything.” Ivermectin, a scabies drug, can now be used to treat corona, opening up a path to the use of generic formulations and relief of side effects and other health hazards. They think this will make doctors more aggressive in prescribing it. 

The vaccination rate for the japanese people as a whole has not reached about 50% for the first time and 40% for the second time yet. The biggest concern of Ozaki, president of the Tokyo Medical Association, which has the largest regional population in Japan, is the tightness of medical facilities that accept critically ill patients and measures to prevent home recuperators from becoming more severe and their conditions suddenly changing. Chairman Ozaki’s words expressed a sense of urgency that he had no choice but to be able to use ivermectin urgently. 

Ivermectin found in Japan has the potential to be the “savior” of the coronal pandemic. Looking at the world’s clinical trial reports so far, it is unlikely that it will not work at all. Many countries, including India, have an urgent experience of administering ivermectin to suppress the spread of infection. In an emergency, I see no reason to hesitate to use it for coronal infection. I’m sure the use of ivermectin is never a “bet”.

Credit goes to Haruo Ozaki and Rensei Baba for this interview/report.

プロフィル
尾崎 治夫氏( おざき・はるお )
 おざき内科循環器科クリニック院長。疾病予防に有効なたばこ対策と要介護を未然に防ぐためのフレイル対策に特に力を入れてきた。東京都医師会長として政府や東京都、医療機関などに新型コロナ対策の要望や提言を続けている。順天堂大学卒、69歳。

Profile Haruo Ozaki Director, Ozaki Internal Medicine Cardiology Clinic. We have been particularly focusing on tobacco control effective for disease prevention and frail measures to prevent nursing care before they are required. As chairman of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, he continues to make requests and proposals for new corona countermeasures to the government, Tokyo Metropolitan Government, and medical institutions.Graduated from Juntendo University, aged 69.

プロフィル
馬場 錬成氏( ばば・れんせい )
 1940年生まれ。読売新聞社社会部、科学部、解説部を経て論説委員。退社後は東京理科大学知財専門職大学院教授、早稲田大学客員教授、文部科学省科学技術・学術政策研究所客員研究官、内閣府総合科学技術会議委員などを歴任。現在、認定NPO法人・21世紀構想研究会理事長。「大丈夫か 日本のもの作り」(プレジデント社)、「大丈夫か 日本の特許戦略」(同)、「ノーベル賞の100年」(中公新書)、「大村智 2億人を病魔から守った化学者」(中央公論新社)、「知財立国が危ない」(共著:日本経済新聞出版社)ほか著書多数。

Profile Mr. Rensei Baba Was born in 1940. After studying at the Yomiuri Shimbun’s Social, Science, and Commentary Departments, he became an editorial board member. After leaving the company, he served as a professor at the Graduate School of Intellectual Property Professionals at Tokyo University of Science, a visiting professor at Waseda University, a visiting researcher at the Institute for Science and Technology Policy of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and a member of the Council for Science and Technology Policy of the Cabinet Office. Currently, he is the president of the 21st Century Conception Society, a certified NPO.

He has written many books, including “All Right or Japanese Making” (President), “Is It Okay or Japan’s Patent Strategy” (Same), “100 Years of the Nobel Prize” (Nakako Shin book), “Satoshi Omura, chemist who protected 200 million people from disease” (ChuoKoron Shinsha), and “Intellectual Property State Is Dangerous” (co-author: Nihon Keizai Shimbun Publishing Co., Ltd.).

Again, while I do not agree with everything stated in the above interview, I do agree with the consensus that there is a worldwide suppression of this treatment.

It is interesting getting the perspective from those in other countries, especially in contrast (comparison) to that of the United States, for one. The similarities of Dr. Ozaki’s concerns echoing that of several frontline doctors/healthcare workers and virologists with their struggles in getting an already approved medicine in the hands of patients that might need them, is a huge testament to the strange conflict we see between several health organizations recommending and showing benefits of this treatment, to that of the “powerhouse” industries [WHO, NIH, FDA, CDC, etc.] and the various governments that are refusing to acknowledge the ivermectin studies.

As Dr. Ozaki states: “But [Merck] says ivermectin doesn’t work, so there shouldn’t be any need to limit the supply. If it doesn’t work, there’s no demand. It looks like we’re blocking supply because we believe it’s going to work.”

This is rather chilling. It is implying, in not so subtle terms, that the supply of Ivermectin is being blocked ON PURPOSE because “they” think it will work in treating COVID. …This is a speculation that many are having, because to continue to deny the efficacy and safety of a drug that has been used for decades, yet suddenly make the drug harder and harder to access, ESPECIALLY after it was shown to be effective against COVID… Something tells me that it has NOTHING to do with our health.

Please continue to stay informed and keep doing research. Thank you for reading, and thank you to those who are speaking up and voicing your concerns instead of just following along with the establishments. God bless.

CDC, FDA Prepare Mass Distribution of a Merck/Sanofi Six-in-One Vaccine for Kids, Turning Blind Eye to Safety Signals

Egregious oversteps endangering children’s lives.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The FDA approved Vaxelis in late 2018, but only now is the shot being readied for widespread distribution — in Europe, where infants have been given six-in-one vaccines for years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the vaccines have been associated with reports of sudden infant death.

Since the mid-1980s, the number of childhood shots on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule has more than quadrupled. When parents express reluctance about turning their little ones into perpetual pin cushions, drug makers and doctors have a ready answer — combination vaccines that “simplify” the schedule by decreasing the number of injections administered.

This month marks the U.S. launch of the Merck/Sanofi joint-venture vaccine, Vaxelis, a six-in-one (hexavalent) combination vaccine that contains diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) components as well as components said to protect against polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B.

Public health officials optimistically believe that bundling all of these components into one shot will help close noncompliance loopholes and increase the likelihood that children will complete “all recommended vaccinations.”

Though Vaxelis is the nation’s first hexavalent injection, it joins other four- or five-in-one vaccines already on the CDC schedule. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Vaxelis in late 2018 — as a three-dose series for 2-, 4- and 6-month-old infants — but it is only now, two-and-a-half years later, that the shot is being readied for widespread distribution.

Warning signs were ignored

There are numerous warning signs that potent all-in-one vaccines are too much for immature immune systems to handle. Concerning safety signals have emerged not just for hexavalent but also pentavalent (five-in-one) vaccines.

In Europe, where infants have been given hexavalent vaccines for some years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the formulations have produced many troubling reports of sudden infant death.

Absurdly, none of the clinical studies assessing Vaxelis safety and efficacy conducted fair comparisons against an inert placebo. Instead, in the two U.S. clinical trials for Vaxelis, not only did investigators compare infants receiving Vaxelis to babies who received Sanofi’s five-in-one Pentacel — but babies in both groups also received rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines at the same time!

In this context, the CDC’s sales pitch to the public — and its claims that side effects are “usually mild” — cannot be considered credible.

Here are some of the other facts missing from the CDC’s communications:

  • In the two U.S. trials six infants died (slide #27) in the Vaxelis group (some after receiving just one dose); one infant also died in the “control” group that received five-in-one vaccines.
  • All six Vaxelis recipients died within six weeks of vaccination. This timing matches other published accounts of infant deaths “clustering” following hexavalent vaccination.
  • The reported causes of death for the infants who received Vaxelis included asphyxia, sepsis, fluid in the brain and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). These outcomes correspond to the types of adverse events reported following hexavalent vaccination in Europe.
  • Package inserts for other vaccines on the CDC schedule list similar causes of death, suggesting these fatal Vaxelis outcomes are plausibly associated with vaccination.
  • In the clinical trials, the rate of fever was notably higher in Vaxelis recipients even when compared to children receiving five-in-one vaccines (47% vs. 34%).

Juicing vaccine sales

In the no-liability context enjoyed by vaccine makers in the U.S., combination vaccines are already quite popular. In fact, market watchers and health economists praise the jumbo shots as being a catalyst for positive industry trends and a “key to commercial success.”

 

Thus, financial analysts expect Vaxelis to “garner significant patient share following its [U.S.] launch” — predicting that it will account for almost a third of U.S. DTaP vaccinations by 2028 — or $841 million in annual sales.

These predictions represent good news for Merck and Sanofi, two of the “big four” pharma giants that dominate the childhood vaccine market in the United States. Merck is already doing a booming vaccine business, recently reporting annual sales growth of 14.8% for its pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax 23) and 5.4% for its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil-9.

However, Merck also faces proliferating Gardasil-related lawsuits — including legal actions alleging that the company knew about and ignored life-changing adverse events from the get-go, many of which (when not fatal) have involved autoimmunity and chronic pain. In fact, before the advent of emergency use COVID vaccines (responsible for an alarming escalation of vaccine-related adverse events), Gardasil had had “more side effects reported than all other vaccines combined.”

Sanofi, too, is embroiled in thousands of lawsuits worldwide — notably for its disastrous and sometimes fatal dengue vaccine. As with Merck, this has not dampened overall vaccine sales growth, which continues its strong upward trajectory, likely to be further strengthened by the U.S. Vaxelis rollout.

Although Sanofi has not been a front-runner in the COVID vaccine race, the company is currently running clinical trials for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines for both COVID and seasonal influenza.

Aluminum secrecy and grandfathered ingredients

Merck’s proprietary, “super-powered” aluminum adjuvant — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) — which is believed to play a significant role in Gardasil’s risk profile, is also present in Vaxelis.

After Merck developed AAHS, it began to “preferentially” feature AAHS in its vaccines even though, as Danish scientists outlined last year, the company appears to have disregarded procedures ordinarily required for approval of new adjuvants.

According to the Danes, at the time AAHS appeared, it represented a “new type of aluminium adjuvant with excipients that [had] not been used earlier in [European Medicines Agency] authorised vaccines.” It should have been — but apparently was not — tested against an inert placebo. For this and other reasons, the Danish scientists question the ethical underpinnings of the Gardasil clinical trials.

In noting that Merck also “seems to have prevented independent studies of AAHS,” the Danes repeated a critique aired by world-famous aluminum expert Christopher Exley in 2018. In an extensive discussion of different aluminum-based adjuvants and their immunological mechanisms of action, Exley and co-authors emphasized the importance of studying aluminum adjuvants one by one, as each is “chemically and biologically dissimilar with concomitantly potentially distinct roles in vaccine-related adverse events.”

Concerningly, the Vaxelis liquid suspension is adjuvanted onto not just AAHS, but also another aluminum adjuvant — aluminum phosphate). The package insert disingenuously shorthands the combination of adjuvants as “aluminum salts.”

How this double whammy of aluminum (319 micrograms per vaccine dose) interacts with the vaccine’s six antigens, or Vaxelis’s numerous other ingredients, or the heavy aluminum load in other childhood vaccines is largely unknown.

According to the Vaxelis package insert, the vaccine also includes: polysorbate 80 (an ingredient flagged for its propensity to induce hypersensitivity reactions); glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde (problematic chemicals deemed necessary to inactivate pertussis toxin); bovine serum albumin (often harvested from bovine fetuses when female cows are found to be pregnant at slaughter); three different antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin B); ammonium thiocyanate (also a rust inhibitor, weedkiller and defoliant); and yeast protein (associated, notably in hepatitis B vaccines, with autoimmune reactions).

Regulatory loopholes allow manufacturers to “grandfather” ingredients into new vaccines if the components are already present in other licensed vaccines — regardless of how inadequate the original safety testing may have been.

Thus, Merck and Sanofi perceived no need to test Vaxelis for DNA-damaging or cancer-causing effects, and conducted no studies of the ingredients’ pharmokinetics (i.e., how the substances move “into, through, and out of the body”).

The main cautionary note sounded in the meager Vaxelis patient information sheet is to not give Vaxelis to children if they are “allergic to any of the ingredients.”

For thee and thee … but not for me?

The CDC seems to be particularly interested in ensuring that poor and non-white children get Vaxelis. The agency began laying the groundwork to offer Vaxelis through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program — the agency’s vaccine program for the poor — over two years ago, in March 2019.

In September of that year, the CDC followed up with an affirmative vote. Public health departments have been promoting Vaxelis to participating VFC providers since early June 2021.

At its September 2019 meeting, CDC outlined another topic deemed important for discussion in the near future — raising the issue of whether Vaxelis should be “preferentially recommended” for the American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) pediatric population.

The tenuous rationale, according to the meeting notes, was because, “in the pre-vaccine era” (more than 35 years ago), “Hib disease occurred at a younger age among the AI/AN population compared to the general population.”

Wave of the future?

Judging from its website, the CDC perceives combination vaccines to be the wave of the future, and has signaled its strong endorsement of Vaxelis by incorporating the new vaccine into its 2021 vaccine schedule.

As if exposure to six antigens were not enough, FDA and CDC also say it is okay for healthcare providers to administer the six-in-one shot at the same time as other vaccines.

These agencies’ characterization of the Vaxelis safety profile as “acceptable” indicates they have either not done their due diligence, or are willing to accept a high level of collateral damage in exchange for the “convenience” of six-in-one shots.

However, as the “overwhelmed by guilt” parents of COVID-vaccine-injured teens are increasingly finding out, convenience is poor consolation for life-changing or life-threatening adverse outcomes.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from CHD

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."

Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert Warned of Mind Control Vaccines in the 1990’s

And more ties to freemasonry.

I am honestly not trying to make deliberate connections from anything I research to freemasonry specifically.

However, I realize that this might have a very synchronous meaning in that the subjects that I am interested in uncovering, just so happen to lead to the same place – and that is freemasonry.

My last post, re-blogged from The Narrow Gate, dealt with pastor Billy Graham since a previous post I made mentioned Franklin Graham and his (incredibly misguided – or perhaps even intentional) advice that Jesus Christ would have wanted us to take this covid vaccine. This was such an obvious attempt at manipulation and deception, that I felt the need to investigate the Graham family further. I wish I could say I was surprised to see that there was a huge relation to freemasonry, but sadly, I was not.

The next item on my list to research further, is the liquid crystal phenomena since I referenced it from my post Magnets/Quarters Sticking to Arms and the connection to vaccines that Pierre Gilbert made in 1995. Which, after checking out the full speech that Pierre Gilbert made, was quite astonished that he made many references to freemasonry as well.

Thus, again, my research somehow leading me to freemasonry again with studying liquid crystals and it’s relation to the vaccine. Again, it is not my purpose to intentionally seek out this correlation. It is just, almost without fail, leading me in that direction. Does everything have a purpose? Is there a reason that this mysterious secret society is turning up in almost every major agenda that is being perpetrated behind the scenes?

Even Anthony Fauci, the talking head of the whole “coronavirus”/”vaccine” agenda has been seen (a couple of times, at least) implementing the hidden hand gesture that is a favorite of freemasons to signal to each other.

The implications of these situations are quite numerous to just be mere coincidence. When one delves deep into many of these occurrences and the organizations behind dictating a global dominance, the path becomes conspicuously clear.

Enter in Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert

I’ve already done a topic on Serge Monast’s famous Blue Beam Project disclosure, which you can read here: Blue Beam Project: What is it?, but lo and behold when I realized that he has also mentioned liquid crystals in relation to the vaccine – just like Pierre Gilbert did in 1995.

English subtitles:

“In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is the contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people.

The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro receivers of electromagnetic fields where waves of very, very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you’ll be turned into a zombie.

Don’t think of this as an hypothesis… this has been done.” – Pierre Gilbert (1995)

Here is Serge Monast’s testimony, 2 years earlier on the liquid crystal vaccines:

The journalist asks: “Do you have other files that you have looked through?”

Serge Monast: “Yes, there is the dossier that I am starting to write next week, and it is a dossier which concerns vaccines, experimental military medicine and liquid crystals.

It’s because I was talking about the different developments in military research produced by the CIA in the United States in terms of vaccines and things like that. And I said listen, it appears from the surveys and results obtained to date that it is possible

It is possible to administer a vaccine, inside of which there does not appear to be anything apparently and which is not offensive to health, in any way.

But on the other hand, the same vaccine, because of its ill-defined content, put in relation a year or 2 years later with another vaccine, which too, seems harmless at first sight, But, the two combined together will produce implausible problems.

And I recently knew that it was possible, without this being necessarily detected at the level of scientific analysis, that it was possible to cut in half a liquid crystal, to put part of it in a vaccine, and a year or 2 years later, the second part is found in another vaccine. The combination of the two, with the information I have at the liquid crystal level, allows the control of individuals, via satellite in order to arrive, at some point, in absolute political control over populations.”

What are these “liquid crystals” that Gilbert and Monast claim will be put into vaccines to control the population?

Here’s one interesting link, that may or may not have anything to do with the predictions of Gilbert and Monast, but is very interesting and relevant reading in any case, and may provide answers as to what these “liquid crystals” can do:

“Living liquid crystals are an example of materials that can act on their own. In nature, these materials are responsible for the motility of cells. Proteins within the cells “walk” along the surface of polymer molecules and exert a force that causes displacement and motion.

“There is a lot of interest in these materials because they are complex, beautiful and relevant,” said de Pablo, vice president for national laboratories. “But we want to understand just how motion and transport are generated within them.”

In the lab, one way to create an autonomous material like this is to combine a liquid crystal with bacteria, which then cause disorder among the liquid crystal when they move.

To study how the material becomes active, the researchers combined swimming bacteria with a liquid crystal in two formats: near the bottom surface of a drop suspended from a needle attached to a glass slide, and in a thin, freestanding film.

Though the bacteria and liquid crystal were initially aligned through a magnetic field, when the field was turned off, the bacteria began to move on their own,” –

“Now we truly understand how this process works, which will ultimately lead to controlling how this material behaves.”

Prof. Juan de Pablo

Controlling crystals for future technologies

The researchers hope to use this information to be able to fully control these living liquid crystals. That would allow them to eventually create a new kind of microfluidic device that transports fluids autonomously without pumps or pressure, or to create synthetic systems that resemble cells and that could move autonomously from one place to another.

“We have a real possibility to control these materials and use them for interesting new technologies,” de Pablo said.”

Source: Scientists harness bacteria to create ‘living’ liquid crystals (2019)

Hm… it sounds eerily similar to what Mr. Monast and Mr. Gilbert have been talking about OVER 20 YEARS AGO.

Now, I want to mention one other name that both Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert mentioned in at least one of their speech.

Texe Marrs.

It’s strange that both Monast and Gilbert referenced this man. Perhaps because they realized that Mr. Marrs was speaking about many truths, though we may not want to believe him. Yes, his material is highly controversial, and that’s the point. Some of the conspiracies he proposes are so far beyond a normal human being’s willingness to comprehend, that some will just automatically dismiss his statements as that coming from a madman. And THAT’S WHY whistleblowers are so hard to believe in a lot of instances. It is OUR unwillingness to believe that something so sinister and evil could possibly ever take hold on our planet and in the hearts of men.

People, these evil and wicked tendencies have been here since the beginning of humankind. One could debate as to the true origin of where it came from or from what it was created, but there is EVIL in the hearts of men and the sooner we realize that, the better we can understand where this agenda to control the whole population comes from.

And when people are consistently revealing that the organizations behind these heinous plans all seem to come from the freemasons, and their history goes back as far back to Nimrod/Babylon and perhaps even further beyond that, and their animosity is aimed towards Jesus Christ – inverting everything that is holy to that of sin and wickedness – then perhaps we can finally set aside our own pride and ego, and REALLY start listening to these brave people trying to expose these malevolent societies/industries.

Deadly Vaccines of the New World OrderTexe Marrs
Is Freemasonry the Very Synagogue of SatanTexe Marrs

Unfortunate (and suspicious) deaths

Sadly, Serge Monast passed away shortly after revealing these insidious plots, allegedly from a heart complication – and right after he had his children taken away, simply for homeschooling them.

The timing of his death is incredibly ironic; and especially when one considers that Texe Marrs – (who describes initiatives that ARE NOT A “CONSPIRACY THEORY” – the people and groups involved have ADMITTED that this is their goal) – died a few months before this “coronavirus” outbreak in December 2019. Would it be presumptuous of me to assume that Mr. Marrs would be one of the hugest proponents of speaking out against these “vaccines”?

Then when we take a look at the suspicious timing of Mr. Kary Mullis’ death in August 2019 – who most assuredly would have been speaking out against Fauci and the PCR tests – seeing as how Mullis HIMSELF INVENTED THEM – and knew exactly what they were for (and it’s NOT for detecting viruses), and who was also against Fauci, it wouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination to predict that he would be speaking out against this vaccination plan as well.

Hence, why these gentlemen are no longer with us. Am I insinuating that these gentlemen were “killed off” so that they wouldn’t be alerting the public to these highly dangerous and ill-begotten vaccines?

Why, yes. Yes I am.

There’s been a string of highly suspicious deaths that strangely target a key profession in incredibly timed stages:

“You may recall that many months ago there was a spate of bankers dying under suspicious circumstances, while jogging, or “falling” (or being pushed) in front of trains, falling onto piked fences, jumping off of roofs, being shot in their cars, and so on. That pattern of strange deaths followed a spate of similar unusual deaths of so-called “homeopathic” doctors, which followed, years before that, a kill-off of biologists and geneticists, and if we want to go all the way back to the Reagan era, a spate of mysterious and suspicious deaths of high energy physicists.”

Source: AFTER A LONG HIATUS, ANOTHER SUSPICIOUS BANKER DEATH… (March 2019)

Another individual, who was a very outspoken vaccine whistleblower, and who was a former sales executive for the pharmaceutical company Merck, Brandy Vaughan, was tragically found dead in her home in December of 2020. She made numerous appeals against the push for this highly suspect vaccine, and made videos and posts urging people to investigate her death should she be found dead, especially after she was targeted and stalked for speaking out against the pharmaceutical companies.

Now who would suffer the most if people stayed away from dangerous “medicines” and drugs, and unnecessary vaccines that do more damage than good – and instead learned how to take care of their own immune system and take care of their body through exercise, fresh air and sunlight, a healthy diet and enough sleep?

Hm… maybe… the pharmaceutical/vaccine companies – that Fauci and Bill Gates both have a vested interest in, and who have made multi-millions/billions from various drugs and vaccines.

Covid created 9 new pharma billionaires; combined wealth enough to vaccinate everyone on planet

Hm… and guess who ISN’T liable if these vaccines end up causing severe side effects or even death?…

True.

“Pharmaceutical companies are protected from liability regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. If someone has an allergic reaction or injury from one of the vaccines, they can petition to receive compensation from the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which also falls under the jurisdiction of HHS, has a better record of providing compensation to people who claim injury from a vaccine than CICP but covers vaccines for diseases such as polio and seasonal influenza, not COVID-19.”

Source: Fact Check: Are Pharmaceutical Companies Immune From COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits?

Normally I stay away from anything labeled “fact check”, but this one was scarily accurate. For more information, guess who DOES end up funding vaccine-related injuries?

We, the taxpayers.

“That’s because pandemic-related claims for vaccines will be routed to a rarely used federal program set up to encourage drugmakers to help combat public health emergencies. It spares pharmaceutical and device makers from costly liability lawsuits in exchange for taxpayers compensating injured patients — though it doesn’t guarantee there’s funding to do so.”Drugmakers Shielded from COVID Vaccine Liability But Funds for Injury Claims in Doubt

Lovely, isn’t it? While these multi-billion dollar companies are free from financial liability, it is us, the normal everyday citizens that had no say in the development of these vaccines, to pay compensation to those who end up suffering for these pharmaceutical companies’ malpractice.

Just splendid.

One last note

Is the advent of mind-control technology so far-fetched that it’s nothing more than a “ridiculous conspiracy theory”?

Well, seeing as how DARPA has been aiming at this research for a very long time, and has been actively pursuing it, I’d say if someone still shrugs all of this data and research off, then they have already been mind-controlled.

Genetically tweaking human brains

“To do this, Robinson’s team plans to use viruses modified to deliver genetic material into cells — called viral vectors — to insert DNA into specific neurons that will make them produce two kinds of proteins.”

“The second protein tethers to magnetic nanoparticles, so the neurons can be magnetically stimulated to fire when the headset generates a magnetic field. This could be used to stimulate neurons so as to induce an image or sound in the patient’s mind.”

“The group’s plan relies on specially designed nanoparticles with magnetic cores and piezoelectric outer shells, which means the shells can convert mechanical energy to electrical and vice versa. The particles will be injected or nasally administered, and magnetic fields will guide them to specific neurons.”

Source: The Government Is Serious About Creating Mind-Controlled Weapons (article written “about 2 years ago”)

I’m not liking the sounds of this. (“Mind-Controlled WEAPONS“) Especially if taking it in relation to an article I did last month about possible nanoparticles being injected by the nasal cavity (perhaps by covid swabs?) – Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs

I can’t say exactly what’s going on. But I do know whatever this covid vaccine is, it is NEFARIOUS in purpose, and I just pray that we all get through this and start waking up to these outrageous agendas.

God bless and much love.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by ParallelVision from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."