Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines

Proof with patents/documents and lab results shows that graphene oxide is in the vaccine.

Researching this subject of course brings up several “fact-checking” websites set on debunking this claim; however, as educated individuals have found out, these fact-checking websites serve one main purpose – and that is to perpetuate only one side of the narrative, even if they’re WRONG.

So instead of me attempting to fact-check the fact-checkers or debunk the doctors/scientists – which I know I can’t do since I am not adept in their fields, my sole purpose in this post is to point out what these doctors/scientists ARE saying and let people decide for themselves what may be the truth.

Of course, the truth is the truth and nothing can change that, but with so much misinformation and misleading content running rampant in today’s world, it’s crucial to scrutinize all of the information and discern the truth from the lies.

The following quotes/transcripts offered here allege to have found a substantially dangerous amount of graphene oxide in several different vaccines. And some speculation as to why these same companies are insisting that just one shot, two shots, booster shots, etc., may not be enough.

(…Again, I’m not a scientist. But what would multiple doses of large graphene oxide amounts do in the human body, especially if it is administered several times per year?… Another haunting question, why have there been graphene oxide found in masks and test swabs as well?)

Graphene Oxide in Jabs, Masks and Swabs

La Quinta Columna discovers large amount of graphene oxide in the vaccination

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Ricardo Delgado @3:43: “Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?”

José Javier Esparza: “The entire COVID disease. And then you, who already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.”

Ricardo Delgado @5:51: ” – because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of 500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha, etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada. You all know that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: if the masks were removed because they caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced into the vial? Moreover, in a considerable amount.

What we have found there, according to what the university that has done this study says, is that the main component is precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something else, but above all it is graphene oxide. And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide.”

Ricardo Delgado @7:36: “It seems that the body has a certain capacity to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain immunological mechanisms. Once inside the body it acts as if it were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione. So that is why, we probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a third dose. Now intranasally. They are already talking about new intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more potent.”

Ricardo Delgado @11:53: “98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide.”

Former Pfizer employee CONFIRMS La Quinta Columna’s findings of graphene oxide in the vaccines

(Some excerpts with corresponding timestamps and embellishment added for emphasis):

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?

Karen Kingston:100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston:I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Karen Kingston @4:58:They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston:Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.

So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized. You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Karen Kingston @11:47: ” – there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team finds graphene oxide in the vaccines

There is also further confirmation of Ricardo Delgado’s findings from Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team, showing similar research results and investigations of graphene oxide in the vaccines.

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / Andreas Kalcker’s team confirms evidence of graphene oxide in ‘vaccines’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Dr. Isignares @00:12: “For example, there is an issue that concerns us a lot because we had already detected certain things in the vaccines. And that’s that these vaccines contain graphene oxide. It’s been verified by electronic microscopy by someone from our team. The question is: why is there graphene?”

Dr. Andreas Kalcker: “To make it crystal clear. What varies is the biological composition of the vaccines. What doesn’t change in any of them, and that’s in all of them, are the crystals that are present in different amounts. They’re present in all the vials. There is both the magnetite, which has a Chinese patent, by the way. It’s patented. You can see… It’s not magnetite. It’s graphene.

Dr. Andreas Kalcker @1:51: “What happens then? The body needs its electromolecular capabilities to work. The heart beats because there’s a magnetic field that creates, subsequently, the electricity for pumping and everything else. And, therefore, what graphene is doing is that it’s completely altering our electromagnetic field. Something that has never happened before. And, let’s say, what we’re seeing is something ‘in vivo’ with some dramatic effects.

To understand more, we have also been watching a lot of videos of people who are dying after being vaccinated. There’re others where you see people spasming. These spasms have, for example, very specific frequencies, and they are, basically the same in all kinds of spasms. These spasms, clearly indicate that there is a disruption of the human electromagnetic fields.”

Research and studies proving that graphene oxide is being attempted to use in vaccines

It’s almost humorous that all of these fact-checking websites are refusing to acknowledge that there might be large amounts of graphene oxide in these vaccines, although the doctors/scientists above have allegedly found evidence that it does, and there are also some published studies that might suggest that graphene oxide will be used in vaccines as well. (please let me know if any of the links are no longer working)

An article on pubmed published the following research in 2016:
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

“Our work not only presents a novel, highly effective GO-based vaccine nano-adjuvant, but also highlights the critical roles of surface chemistry for the rational design of nano-adjuvants.”

Another article on pubmed published this research in 2018:
Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

“These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system.”


The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.”

And yet another article from pubmed published in 2020:
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant

“Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.”

“Keywords: Adjuvant delivery; Antigen delivery; Functionalized-GO; Immune adjuvant; Vaccine adjuvant; Vaccine nano-carrier.”

There is also this study showing how graphene oxide can inhibit certain responses, such as anxiety, fear, etc. (which, just theorizing, may perhaps take away someone’s natural instinct to perceive danger or threats…) when injected into certain parts of the brain. (Which also begs the question… what happens when this material gets injected into other parts of the brain…)

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Of course the title of the link downplays the implications that this graphene oxide can cause – which seems to be a manipulative tactic that people employ to try and convince others of the benefits of a potentially dangerous substance and/or decision. And while on the surface drugs and medicines may have advantageous effects, we can’t overlook the possibility that others may use the same drugs and medicines/procedures/gene therapy, etc. and twist it to fit their own purposes.

From the same link:

“Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Now I propose a theory of my own: In the near future, the same fact-checking writers/articles that were “debunking” all of the ‘graphene oxide in vaccines research’ will state something to the effect of: “Even though there is graphene oxide in the vaccines, there’s no reason for alarm” and/or “The graphene oxide material found in vaccines are not large enough to cause harm”, etc., etc., until the headlines change once again to state, “Why too much graphene oxide in your system is detrimental to your health” and “Further booster shots will not contain graphene oxide due to its dangers”.

Only time will tell…

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and all those exposing this egregious corruption.
And a special thank you to Orwell City for translating and transcribing the videos with Ricardo Delgado and Andreas Kalcker & team.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by seagul from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

Comparing CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, and FOX

Nothing suspicious to see here…

Just like the title says, this post aims to look at each of these US mainstream news outlets (their website – not their TV channels – I don’t watch TV – and I advise you to not watch television as well…) to compare with each other and see how deep and far the propaganda goes.

I never regularly visit these websites (and certainly not their homepage) and the only times that I even visit their site is to check out a related news article to what I’m looking up. I regularly clear “cookies” and website/search history, so I’m hoping these have no bearings on my findings.

First, I am capturing a screenshot of whatever first pops up on each of the website, and taking it from there.

So let’s get started.

CNN

Screenshot taken from cnn.com.

NBC

Screenshot taken from nbcnews.com.

ABC

Screenshot taken from abcnews.go.com.

MSNBC

Screenshot taken from msnbc.com.

FOX

Screenshot taken from foxnews.com.

(All screenshots were taken on 1/3/2021 between 10:00-10:30 A.M.)

Just taking a glance at some of these headlines literally gives me anxiety and I can feel stress levels start to arise. Thankfully, I can recognize when this is happening (and why it’s happening) which is why I always stress (no pun intended) to be aware of your surroundings and your own thoughts and emotions. Since I already know how these news outlets work and how they’re geared for the sole purpose of manipulating and controlling the public, and instilling fear and negativity, there’s something to be said for how these news outlets work on others who aren’t aware of this agenda.

And while NBC and MSNBC are among the same company, I wanted to show them as two separate entities. (And just as a heads up, even checking out PBS and CBS show similar results to the ones above.)

Now below, I’ve created pie charts to show what the majority of “news” they have to “inform” us are (at least according to the very first impression we get upon visiting their webpage) :

Now, I admit, since we’re heading off into the electoral vote (which allegedly is supposed to mean something and we should definitely not think there’s anything corrupt going on with our government and should instead trust them blindly that there was no election fraud (or any other corruption, for that matter…..)) the results of this finding is bound to be skewed towards that of politics specifically. Which is why I’ve already decided that once all of these politics sort of quiet down and things are finalized once and for all, I will re-visit this post and do an updated version of what these same news channels cover. Just to see how much has changed and what they choose to focus on next.

Next, I want to see what kind of biased/descriptive terminology we can see from these websites.

Let it be noted, first and foremost. I am not above this. I admit it outright. I will sometimes use certain adjectives to describe and reveal my frustration and thoughts on certain matters. But while I am an independent writer not affiliated with any mainstream news media, my opinions are based on several different outlets and sources. It is not labeled as a “news” platform, and these should be based on facts and honest reporting. As it is, what you will find at this site is honest findings and my personal views on the matter. Not paid promotion or propaganda, unlike the very obvious (there’s one) agendas of the msm.

CNN’s favorite words

So just looking at the very first link of the CNN screenshot from above, we can see the term “conspiracy theories” that a lot of people like to use in order to discredit any kind of alternative source to what the main narrative is pushing for. Never mind the fact that numerous esteemed doctors and health/science experts don’t agree with the main narrative; yet, if we are to believe the government endorsed agencies on what “experts” mean, it seems to only apply to those who are in agreement with whatever “information” the government and msm is presenting to the public. Anyone else who raises speculative and alternative theories (even based on facts and studies) are immediately “debunked” and ostracized.

This second post from cnn.com (retitled as “Republican efforts to undermine Biden victory expose growing anti-democratic streak”) is filled with even more biased and opinionated views (labeled as an “analysis”) – written in a way to ridicule anyone who thinks otherwise: “scattershot, exploit, manufactured, conspiracy theory (again), charade, etc., etc., etc.” Keep in mind, these were just the top two links that were available on their page.
Let’s take a look at what NBC offers.

Trump throws grenades into high-stakes Georgia Senate runoffs in final stretch – “Outgoing President Donald Trump is throwing one rhetorical grenade after another into the high-stakes Georgia Senate runoffs in the final days before the Tuesday election.

(Phew! I’m glad they added that it was “rhetorical grenades”. With the news media reporting lately, sometimes I wonder if they literally want people to think Trump is throwing actual live grenades…)

In this article, apparently “grenades” actually means “false” allegations into election fraud. The terms “false” and “falsely“, I realize, is used a lot in the mainstream media and social media platforms in order to describe the “alleged” presidential election fraud. (And whatever else they deem as “fake news”.)

Let’s see what the next articles says:

Fauci pushes back on Trump: Covid death numbers are ‘real’ – “Dr. Anthony Fauci on Sunday pushed back on President Donald Trump’s false claims that the U.S. coronavirus death toll is “exaggerated.

Well, that was fast. Two articles, back to back? Both focused on alleged “false” news? Reminds me of CNN with their usage of “conspiracy theories”.

Another word used in this article that is everywhere in order to manipulate the public, is “misinformation“. Who decides if something is “false” and who “fact checks” and labels something as “misinformation”? None other than the propagators of this whole agenda. Why do some people still continue to believe them? Perhaps because they were raised and conditioned to believe these sources, neglecting to realize that it has now become a front to indoctrinate the masses.

More buzzwords from ABC

‘There’s no running away from the numbers:’ Fauci laments surging COVID deaths as Trump claims ‘fake news’ – “Fauci’s comments came minutes after President Donald Trump misleadingly claimed in a tweet that the numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of infected persons and deaths in the country are “exaggerated,

I am not going to go into the inconsistencies of the covid reports/cases, etc. – because, indeed, there is so much misinformation surrounding this subject, and I encourage you to investigate for yourself and use several different outlets to come to an educated theory. This is not the post for that. Just to show you the ways that these news outlets lead (mislead) someone into believing a certain narrative.

Here is another article (keeping in line with the politics/covid topics) that is written to, again, mislead the reader into what to believe (and not to believe):

Congress opens new session as virus, Biden’s win dominate – “It’s often said that divided government can be a time for legislative compromises, but lawmakers are charging into the 117th Congress with the nation more torn than ever, disputing even basic facts including that Biden won the presidential election.

Fraud did not spoil the 2020 presidential election, a fact confirmed by election officials across the country.

Funny. I thought “facts” are confirmed by truth and evidence, not by election officials. But you learn something new everyday…

MSNBC’s point of view

Most of the articles on this site is linked to a video, which I am not going to watch, but here is the only written article that I can present, with, again, their own allegation of no proof in the supposed election fraud that occurred.

Trump allies shouldn’t be sworn into office until cleared of their own claims of election fraud – “But this time, some GOP members if Congress have indicated they will object — or are considering objecting — to counting the electoral votes from key battleground states, claiming without proof that there was widespread voter irregularities or fraud that renders the election results illegitimate.

It seriously makes me wonder what they would consider as “proof“.

There is also this at the very end of the same article: “Any other result will undermine the public’s confidence in our election process — which is already dangerously under attack by Trump and his comrades in arms.

“Dangerously under attack”? “Comrades in arms”? I hope this is another rhetorical allegory and not implying more grenades…

Fox’s outlook

That brings me to the last major news media on this list. Let’s check out a couple of their articles to see if we can find some interesting correlations like the ones above.

From actively trying to look at all of these news sites with an unbiased view and deliberately trying to find leading content, the main article from the above screenshot: GOP senators want election commission similar to what decided disputed 1876 race seems to just depict straight-forward reporting. (At least at the time of its last update.)

Keeping in line with the above method, let’s take a look at one more article. (Note: I did not cherry-pick any of the articles. I picked the main story of each page, and made sure that one article dealt with a political angle, and one with a covid/vaccine angle. Just to keep all of them fair and similar. Since there are no articles dealing with the covid situation on FOX’s screenshot, I have chosen to look at the very next written article I see on this page.)

Cruz says Supreme Court ‘better forum’ for election disputes amid Electoral College objection push – The only thing I can find on this article would be the following sentence: “Evidence of any widespread voter fraud that could have changed the outcome of the election, however, has been lacking.” – But then we see it following up with this sentence: “Former Attorney General William Barr declared that to be the case weeks after the election“. This is not contested, and these are facts. The fact that, yes, William Barr did indeed say that.

But when we take this particular sentence and actually analyze it, it’s interesting that it has to specify that “Evidence (which certain individuals can certainly avoid simply by labeling it as “not evidence enough” or “not proof”) of any widespread voter fraud that could have changed the outcome of the election, however, has been lacking” … Needless to say, his choice of words is extremely strange and lends credence to the idea that although voter fraud, does, in fact exist, it is not “sufficient” enough in his findings to make a difference.

(I think a lot of us are underestimating (or in complete denial about) the amount of corruption, bribery and/or threats that are coerced upon those in a high position that would make these decisions… But I digress.)

The Verdict

So here was a quick rundown of 5 news outlets and the initial findings of how they can manipulate and coerce their reader into a certain way of thinking. This was just the written findings that were on the front page of their website, and did not even touch upon the videos and their verbal dialogue with each other and those with opposing points of views. We didn’t get to see body language and voice inflections, condescension or aversion towards different ideologies. I can only imagine what kind of impressions I would get from watching the videos. (Perhaps that will be another post for a different day as well.)

And from the two articles from FOX, it seems as if this has been the least manipulative/(mis)leading source of the 5 different news outlets covered.

Honestly, I find it fascinating that what is labeled as “news” is nothing more than highly partisan perspectives constantly bombarding the viewers/readers in most cases. And, by looking at just the few articles and topics from their website, we can see a lot of negativity and propaganda.

While being informed is important, we have to realize that the definition of “informed” is:

in·formed
adj.
1. Possessing, displaying, or based on reliable information: informed sources; an informed opinion.
2. Knowledgeable; educated: the informed consumer.

thefreedictionary.com/informed

SYNONYMS:
commonsense, commonsensible, commonsensical, firm, good, hard, just, justified, levelheaded, logical, rational, reasonable, reasoned, sensible, sober, solid, valid, well-founded

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/informed

It doesn’t mean to believe biased sources based on opinionated points of views and alleged “facts” that haven’t been verified (or have been verified and are just labeled “disputed” by those very same propagators…).

When it comes to being informed, we have to use our best judgement and discernment and realize that the goal of some of these individuals and corporations is to literally control the masses. What better way to inundate them than with disinformation disguised as “news”?

We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
– William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”