Exposing NASA’s Many Lies

Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.

Whew! What a rabbit hole, ladies and gentlemen.

After researching the NASA (national aeronautics and space administration) organization and the alleged space explorations they’ve been conducting, I’ve come to my own opinion that it is all one HUGE lie.

Below, we’ll take a look at the many, MANY times NASA has been caught lying, on top of other rather extremely suspicious circumstances.

Enjoy! (or don’t, being massively lied to by a billion-dollar organization on what they’re doing with people’s tax money… also thank the government for that.)

1. Caught staging a simulation or hologram?

The whole video makes a very interesting case about NASA and their illegitimacy, including CGI fakery, strange physics, continuity errors, etc. so I highly encourage viewing the whole video. But at the :30 second mark, you can see a gentleman literally disappearing through an entry port in this alleged spacecraft. This is just one of MANY times the “space exploration” teams have been caught using deception and different kinds of technology to simulate a trip into outer space.

2. NASA caught faking photos

Take a look at the following images and the bizarre excuses and “coincidences” that preside with it:

Some people will try and explain away this picture by stating that NASA had no other choice but to super impose duplicate areas of the Earth onto the image in order to fill in gaps (whatever that means…), but more than likely, someone in the editting room was just too lazy to render the fake image correctly, and quite possibly banked on the idea that people wouldn’t catch them in the act. And with the amount of shills pouring themselves over NASA (are they getting paid to do it?), knew that they would have some misled souls to come to their defense.

This isn’t the only example, by the way. There are tons of them. And this video also proposes additional theories as to what the planets could be textured by.

This image is directly shown on NASA’s own website, allegedly depicting the Earth in 2015. Now, either God is one huge practical joker, or NASA is pulling a fast one over the public’s eyes. Which one do you think it is?

The image on the left shows the landscape in Mauna Kea, Hawaii.

The image on the right shows the moon landscape from the Apollo 17 mission. (supposedly…)

By a bizarre set of pure coincidence, it just so happens that the Apollo 17 astronauts were able to land at a specific distance to that particular hill on the moon, which bears an uncanny resemblance to the same distance as the hill/summit of Mauna Kea. What are the chances?

Did I forget to mention? Mauna Kea was a direct training ground for the Apollo astronauts.

Investigating the Apollo Valley

Buzz Aldrin standing infront of the hills in Mauna Kea, Hawaii. There seems to have been some photo editing going on, as you can see the large mountain in the distance in this photo, but not in the other two. Unless it’s a matter of perspective being on the other side of the hills, coincidentally showing similar geographic terrain.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

This is, quite frankly, the stupidest picture I’ve ever seen. Especially since it’s coming from a corporation who “allegedly” spends billions of dollars a year to explore space, yet they expect us to believe that this is an “actual image” captured from one of their satellites that’s positioned a MILLION miles from Earth. (But hey, I guess they win, because apparently some people DO believe this is real. #sigh – 2016 Tournament Earth Champion: The Dark Side of the Moon)

I worry about the human race. : (

And here is the image of Earth captured from the Apollo 11 mission that supposedly landed on the moon in 1969.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

I don’t believe this is a real image either, but do we see any significant perspective changes between this image “taken in 1969” and the one from 2015? No? Just me? Did the Earth grow exponentially since then?

2011: “Now a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth.” – NASA research confirms it’s a small world, after all

Whew. I’m glad NASA could put that speculation to rest. Because after all, if it’s coming from NASA, it must be the truth. Still doesn’t explain how the two photos above both came from space though, while depicting the same objects with outrageous size differences. Unless between 2011-2015 the Earth did, in fact, grow to that massive size. Or the moon shrunk. Perhaps NASA will come out with another study to explain this.

3. “Astronauts” in water

The official claim made is that astronauts train underwater because it closely simulates what it would be like to be in outer space with the difference in gravity compared to Earth. However, even if this was a legitimate reason, how would that explain passing off these underwater escapades as actual “space exploration” footage for the public’s viewing pleasure?

This video makes a very compelling case exposing NASA trying to pass off underwater training as real outer space expeditions.

(Almost similar to how they were trying to pass off simulations from rocky Earth terrains as real moon landings…)

4. Obvious Hairspray is Obvious

If it’s a simple matter of keeping hair out of one’s face, even in zero g… then the usual routine would probably involve putting the hair up in a ponytail or a bun, and/or use hairpins.

But THIS:

is utterly ridiculous, and a waste of money.

Are we really to believe that just because someone puts on a ton of hairspray to deliberately style their hair to depict what it may look like in outer space, that everyone is just going to buy this notion and continue on with our blind faith in this dishonest institution?

Well, apparently, because as we all SHOULD know, hair obviously defies the laws of physics and just sticks straight up on space missions and then bounces back into a designated shape, even though a heavier, denser object – like metal (maybe a necklace, say, or a zipper) floats freely around.

And if you watch closely, you can also tell there’s something fishy about the gentleman’s necklace…

5. Responses of astronauts (both former and current) to certain questions/interviews

While Bart Sibrel is known for his “ambush” journalism, the takeaway from these interviews is that Mr. Sibrel makes these former astronauts extremely uncomfortable and extremely defensive.

If it was an honest manner of really going to the moon, like they’re claiming, then why are their reactions and responses so hostile, and even in some cases, fearful? Almost as if this investigative journalist is close to finding out the truth and the men involved in this corruption/coverup have been coerced into silence and they take out their vitriol on anyone who comes close to exposing this egregious scheme.

There are many more examples than just this, in which we can see the awkwardness and uncertainty in some of the officials being interviewed, and it lends a significant distrust in the eyes of the public. (At least, if the people haven’t been completely brain-washed by the different establishments – government/education/media, etc.)

Here’s a look at some different transcripts from other cringe-worthy interviews:

If you watch the link connected with this Q/A,  pay close attention to the “astronauts’ ” body language and nervous expressions. Not to mention the rather telling response that was given:

Question:What can we do in an age where, so many people seem so skeptical about what they see and hear to assure them that what they’re seeing from us is, as you explore space is actually real, and uh, can you also tell us where over the Earth you are, about right now?

Answer:Well I think uh, it’s our duty to continue to just produce imagery of all types. Video imagery and still imagery, and we’ll do it with a, integrity, and uh, and the more we put out there the more real it becomes to everyone.

NASA Busted! Clone tool overusage. Space is a photoshop production!

Keep in mind, low-Earth orbit is considered to be between 160-2,000 km (99-1200 miles), and by NASA’s own admission, the moon (which astronauts allegedly landed on in the late 60’s-70’s) is estimated to be ~384,000 km (238,855 miles).

3:37 – 3:50:But we’re also really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we’re going forward with exploration. I think, uh, humans are naturally driven to do this, and this is really the beginning, I think, of human beings leaving low-Earth orbit.

4:08 – 4:51:The plan that NASA has is to build a rocket called SOS, which is a heavy-lift rocket. It’s something that is, that is much bigger than what we have today, and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destinations beyond Earth orbit.

Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That’s the farthest that we can go. And this new system that we’re building is going to allow us to go beyond, and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore, so- the moon, Mars, asteroids, there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually.

NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

6. A threat to contact CIA to “wax” a researcher

At the end of Bart Sibrel’s “interview” with Ed Mitchell – as we can see at the end of the “Astronauts Gone Wild” video posted above, we not only have the direct threat from Mr. Mitchell to get a gun and shoot Bart, but then his son speaks up and says quite plainly, “Want to call the CIA and have them waxed?

Waxed for what, exactly? Questioning the NASA narrative that the moon walk was real? Coming to that house/office under “false pretenses”? Accusing him of satanic participation? (Michael Aquino, anyone?)

Are these legitimate reasons to have someone waxed? What about using taxpayers’ money to fraudulently claim to going to the moon just to have something to show for it while using that money for other reasons? Why are all these astronauts so concerned with the moral ethics of this journalist, and not their own moral ethics for possibly lying to billions of people while simultaneously protecting the industry who is working to deceive and manipulate everyone into following a certain scientific belief?

As some people have proposed, could these “astronauts” have been mind-controlled by the CIA into believing the very tale that the government/NASA has perpetrated worldwide, and/or these astronauts inherently know that they are in the wrong, but are under compliance as a means of “national security”?

After all, if the son of Edgar Mitchell was so cavalier as to announce that they basically have the CIA on speed dial (I may be embellishing the story a little – but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was close to the truth) to “take care of” opposition, it ties into the theory that the CIA was(is) indeed closely tied to the NASA missions. – NASA’s Secret Relationships with U.S. Defense and Intelligence Agencies

7. NASA logo

Not everything has to be about exposing the lies and cover-up that NASA in engaged in. Just take a look at their logo, which is obviously meant to depict a snake tongue flicking out towards Earth.

Why is that so suspect?

Well, when you have several other organizations, like the WHO (medical industry in general) and the Vatican, both of which are, imho, corrupt factions, that use a snake as their logo – not to mention the biblical side of things depicting the serpent as the wicked, sinful entity causing the fall of man, AND the fact that the serpent (many who claim is Satan/Devil/Lucifer) is called the “FATHER OF LIES” and “THE DECEIVER” – along with many other flattering nicknames, it makes one wonder the true reason why they would use the snake as their logo.

(Not to mention there’s some heated debate that nasa literally means “to deceive” in Hebrew. A lot of people claim that tptsb love to use symbolism and play on words/origin to indicate what they’re doing in secret. Another interesting coincidence: Neil A. (Armstrong) is “alien” backwards. Funny how he was the very first person that landed on the moon.)

Sure some may argue that it’s not really a snake tongue and instead some ribbon or some yada yada yada, but research into these organizations and their motives would suggest otherwise.

Back in 1830, there is an account of a vision of Mary who appeared to St. Catherine Labouré and told her to make a model of this vision: Mary, standing on a snake, which is curled on top of the Earth. What does this “Miraculous Medalreally mean?

8. Excuses, excuses, excuses

When was the last time we went to the moon?

1972? But why?

Because of this?

US spaceflight operations were focused entirely on Low Earth Orbit activities, as well as admirable cooperative international programs such as the International Space Station, and major scientific instruments such as Mars Pathfinder, Opportunity/Spirit and Curiosity. Other major concerns have redirected US attentions from spaceflight: the United States’ War on Terror, which is expected to cost US taxpayers over $5 trillion dollars in the long run.The Real Story Of Apollo 17… And Why We Never Went Back To The Moon

Really?

Or how about this reason?

A 2005 report by NASA estimated that returning to the moon would cost about $104 billion ($133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $120 billion in today’s dollars.

Manned exploration is the most expensive space venture and, consequently, the most difficult for which to obtain political support,” Cunningham said during his testimony.Astronauts explain why nobody has visited the moon in more than 45 years — and the reasons are depressing

(Yes. Please don’t waste ANYMORE taxpayers money on staged programs that are a complete farce. Thank you.)

Maybe it’s THIS reason: ALIENS Here’s the real reason why NASA never returned to the Moon (Video)

Or this laughable reason: I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

No, I think the real reason is that we’ve never been to begin with.

9.  Debate on the physics of the spacecraft landing

This is just a supposition, but if NASA really did go to the moon in 1969, and the total weight of the lunar lander when it landed was supposedly around 24 tons, of course not counting the gravity difference between the moon and the Earth (if that is even true…), one could wonder why there is no apparent disturbance to the ground underneath the spacecraft. Even a light bicycle will kick up some dust and disturb the terrain, depending on the conditions of the ground, of course.

Yet with this event, we are to believe that a 24 ton spacecraft merely spread out dust away from underneath the landing area and did nothing more to the ground. Due to our limited knowledge of the exact nature of the moon’s composition, it is honestly hard to say what this massive spacecraft could do.

However, if we take the following video into account, showing how easy it was for Neil Armstrong to disturb the dust around his feet, even kicking up the dust in a similar fashion to that of Earth:

And then seeing one of the legs of the craft on the solid ground, undisturbed by any collection of dust/sand/etc., compared to the footsteps RIGHT NEXT to it, clearly showing deep impressions from a much lighter object (a human being), I’m going to have to call B.S. on this whole operation. Even with the amount of distribution at the bottom of each leg, the physics of this phenomena do not add up.

And it is NOT indented into the ground on one side, as some people have proposed:

As with everything that NASA has been caught out on, they have some “scientific mumbo-jumbo” to try and back themselves up, as well as the poor deluded people that refuse to believe anything untowards is happening; other than conspiratorial minds just coming up with “crazy theories” due to their paranoia, that is. Refusing to look at the data and the evidence and instead just becoming talking points for this deceptive company and rehashing everything they’re peddling, is a tragic sign of how far mass manipulation has become.

10. “Moon rocks” came from Earth

Soon after Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins’ return to Earth from the Apollo mission, a moon rock was given to Willem Drees Jr. as a gift:

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing.” – Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

However, after scientific study of this rock, concluded that it was actually petrified wood.

And from the Apollo 14 mission, a 1.8 gram specimen was suspected of coming from Earth, having many qualities of rock compositions from our planet than what scientists would expect from the moon.

Research author Professor Alexander Nemchin, from Curtin’s School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said in a statement the tiny 1.8-gram sample of Moon rock is similar in composition to granite.

The expert said: “The sample also contains quartz, which is an even more unusual find on the Moon.”

Professor Nemchin also added, “It is possible that some of these unusual conditions could have occurred very locally and very briefly on the Moon and the sample is a result of this brief deviation from normality.

However, a simpler explanation is that this piece was formed on the Earth and brought to the surface of the Moon as a meteorite generated by an asteroid hitting Earth about four billion years ago, and throwing material into space and to the Moon.” – NASA Moon landing SHOCK: Apollo 14 Moon rock sample came from EARTH – Not from space

Uh huh. An even simpler, simpler explanation is that they never went to the moon at all.

BONUS:

The questionable build of the lunar lander aside (just look at it), while capturing just the little bit of Earth off in the distance in 1969… compared to their award-winning Earth and moon photo in 2015/2016…

lol

It’s crazy the amount of things that NASA has been caught fibbing in; from their numerous shady interviews with supposed astronauts, who can’t come to the same conclusion of whether they could see stars in space or not, to the very obvious fake images. Keep in mind, this is just a very small list of the suspicious actions that NASA has engaged in. And it’s even crazier that people still believe these lies.

Sadly, until people open their eyes and finally concede that NASA and the government have been implementing this duplicitous scheme, the world will continue to be led astray. “Space” is not the answer.

And on another rather related mystery, I propose that there may just be a dome/firmament around us (that the world leaders don’t want us to know about), but that is another topic for a different day.

For additional reading into NASA’s very suspicious establishment, please visit the following websites:

NASA’S TRILLION DOLLAR TREASON
Something Shady About NASA
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

Genesis 8: Noah’s Deliverance

Earnest Examination

This series is presented as an honest, sincere look into the study of the Bible with my own personal theories, opinions, comments and that of others’ insights and research into what the verses could mean. I cannot claim one way or another that everything that I am stating is fact and the true meaning of what is meant in these verses.

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

All verses used are from biblestudytools.com (NIV) Genesis 8

Noah’s Deliverance

1 But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters receded.
I am certainly not trying to put words in the mouth of the Bible, but I am wondering what this verse is alluding to. It’s not like God can forget Noah and his companions, right? At least in my upbringing, I was taught that God knows what is going on AT ALL TIMES, so it’s impossible for Him to “forget” anyone. Was this verse just a way to humanize God so that people can relate and understand some of His mysterious, but sovereign decisions? I truly don’t know.
2 Now the springs of the deep and the floodgates of the heavens had been closed, and the rain had stopped falling from the sky.
3 The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the water had gone down,
When I was younger, I always assumed that after the infamous 40 days, that everything was hunky dory right after that. It didn’t even cross my mind that it would take time for the water to recede. I just thought, in my childish naivete, that after 40 days, the water would automatically have dissipated, and everyone could go on with their lives. To be honest, I didn’t even think otherwise until much later on in my adulthood. So to see it really spelled out for me and giving me a better outlook as to how long the process really took, was sort of shocking, to say the least. It makes me wonder what else we take for granted when it comes to information and basic knowledge.
4 and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat.
You know, when I initially started this chapter, I thought I wouldn’t find much to comment on. But surprisingly, while doing some research on these specific places and time frame, actually found too much information that I couldn’t possibly cover all on this one post.
When looking up the mountains of Ararat, it took me to various sources of fascinating history:

– from the alleged eye-witness accounts of Noah’s Ark as early as the 1800’s (possibly even earlier), and then throughout the decades by various different adventurers – one including Vladimir Roskovitsky.
And if one digs deep enough, may find a connection between the “perfect timing” of Vladimir’s discovery, and the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917; which just so happened to cause the loss of the evidence of this historic find. (Hm… what does that remind me of? Oh yeah! The purported discovery of King Gilgamesh’s tomb in Baghdad, and then right after that, the US invasion of Iraq! Which also, in a strange turn of events, also just happened to lose evidence to these findings. Coincidence? Or completely planned?)

– to a hoax that CBS ran (not surprising), featuring a man named George Jammal who alleged to having witnessed the ark. It turned out that CBS was being duped by Mr. Jammal, even when he referred to some lovely names, such as: Mr. Asholian, Vladimir Sobitchsky, and Allis Buls Hitian.

– to the interesting references to Gilgamesh (which I ironically covered not too long ago in this post) and Ishtar (whom I also referenced due to the insane amount of symbolism that can be seen throughout the entertainment industry.) I am not making these connections on purpose. They are just “coincidentally” being mentioned when researching these seemingly different topics.
5 The waters continued to recede until the tenth month, and on the first day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains became visible.
6 After forty days Noah opened a window he had made in the ark
7 and sent out a raven, and it kept flying back and forth until the water had dried up from the earth.
8 Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground.
9 But the dove could find nowhere to perch because there was water over all the surface of the earth; so it returned to Noah in the ark. He reached out his hand and took the dove and brought it back to himself in the ark.
I want to make a mention that in some other versions of the Bible, the verses are rather specific in stating that the dove is female; describing the dove as “she”/”her”. Yet in this version, it does not mention the bird’s gender at all. This is very strange to me. It is almost as if this version (and others like it) made a deliberate decision to exclude the gender of the bird, for some reason.

Is the gender of the bird relevant? Important? To be honest, even if it wasn’t, if it is not an accurate translation of the original Bible, no matter the relevance, then it is still highly suspect and makes one wonder what else this translation has changed from the original version. I say “original” version because even though I don’t read Hebrew, Aramaic, etc. and can’t possibly know what the true original texts say, I am basing this information off of the Wycliffe Version which was allegedly written in the late 1300’s. If this is one of the earliest texts we have to go by, then their version states that the dove is female. Along with several other versions after that. The NIV, as well as a handful of others, seem to specifically omit this detail. It seems very bizarre that they would make a conscious effort to do so.

On the other hand, if there were no precise origins for the use of describing the bird as a female, and the translators do so out of their understanding or opinion, then I can understand why they would not want to specify. But it is just another reason that it is hard to take everything the Bible states as accurate, since there are too many different versions/translations/alterations. (It is also interesting to note that the Wycliffe version states that it was a crow, and not a raven, that Noah initially sent out to find land. If that has any significance on the matter.)
10 He waited seven more days and again sent out the dove from the ark.
11 When the dove returned to him in the evening, there in its beak was a freshly plucked olive leaf! Then Noah knew that the water had receded from the earth.
There are interesting debates as to whether plants could live through a flood of such magnitude, as many speculate that all plant life would drown/die off due to being overwhelmed by the deluge for so long; but scientifically speaking, plants/grass/seeds, etc. can indeed survive even after a considerable amount of undesirable conditions. (How Did Plants Survive and Disperse after the Flood?)
12 He waited seven more days and sent the dove out again, but this time it did not return to him.
13 By the first day of the first month of Noah’s six hundred and first year, the water had dried up from the earth. Noah then removed the covering from the ark and saw that the surface of the ground was dry.
14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry.
15 Then God said to Noah,
16 “Come out of the ark, you and your wife and your sons and their wives.
17 Bring out every kind of living creature that is with you—the birds, the animals, and all the creatures that move along the ground—so they can multiply on the earth and be fruitful and increase in number on it.”
18 So Noah came out, together with his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives.
19 All the animals and all the creatures that move along the ground and all the birds—everything that moves on land—came out of the ark, one kind after another.

God’s Covenant with Creation

20 Then Noah built an altar to the LORD and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it.
I mentioned it a little bit about this in the previous chapter with Cain and Abel, and I don’t want to insinuate that I know anything about how the world works, but I do question the… ritualistic aspect of building altars and sacrificing things for God. I am just confused and curious as to why this would be a practice. And to think it allegedly started with Cain and Abel offering their crops/flock. Why did they do this? Did God ask them to? There are some Christian apologetics who claim that yes, sacrifices were needed to appease God and show their faith to Him and/or to wipe away sin. Some even say there are biblical references that it needs to be a “blood sacrifice”, which then obviously wouldn’t include crops like Cain tried to offer. Of course, that is if we’re taking the scripts to be literal. And this is what I have a problem with.
Again, I can’t pretend to think that I know better about how “life” and this world works, but speaking as a person who believes in spirituality and the goodness of one’s heart, the act of sacrificing anything “for the higher good” is lost on me.

21 The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: “Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
And that brings me to this verse. Now, don’t get me wrong, I love animals and am trying to transition to vegetarian-ism, although I haven’t fully reached that destination quite yet, so I must admit that I love the smell of a good barbecue as much as the next person. But again, the mystery of a burnt offering that is pleasing to the Lord escapes me. So unless I am just not understanding how a universal creator could be tempted by the smell of delicious meats and (basically?) requires blood sacrifices in order to wipe sin away, perhaps I am just misconstruing the deeper, philosophical meaning, or – there is something not quite accurate with this interpretation.

Then, to make matters even more confusing, since there is no real proof of who wrote Genesis to begin with, we have to ask ourselves, how did the author know what the Lord said “in his heart”? Did God reveal this to the author? If the author was Moses, like some biblical scholars believe, then perhaps Moses himself received visions of this very revelation and was led to write it down for prosperity sakes and at the command of God for our enlightenment. Of course it’s said that the Bible is the Word of God in and of itself, so perhaps this makes sense. But obviously I am not sure on this matter, and will have to do more extensive research on this to even get close to understanding this subject. Especially since there is no concrete evidence either way.

One more note, God admits that “every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood“. According to these Bible verses. But yet, He still found some worthy of being saved. Now, again, the knowledge of who is written in the Book of Life (who will be saved) is already known to Him. He already knows who has a good heart (even though we’re all born with evil inclinations, supposedly) and who will remain steadfast and have faith. So we have to address the whole act of unleashing the flood upon the world, save but a few, knowing that in the end, those very same few will give rise to the current situations we have today, and eventually who leads us to the apocalypse in Revelation.

God sees all, so it seems as if predestination vs. free will is still a highly debated topic and possibly won’t end until the whole world does. And if Noah and his extended family ended up completely innocent of this, then we have to come to terms that not everyone died during the flood. Plus when you take into account that the previous chapter about Nephilims stated that they lived before, and after, the flood, it makes one wonder how they survived or came back into being. – And I can go on and on with “human heart is evil” verse, but I will just end this topic here before I get too long-winded.
22 “As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease.”

Like I said above, I could go on and on about the human heart and our inclinations, but that might have to be on a separate post. I was also really intrigued by the historical connections to King Gilgamesh and Ishtar, as well as the strange coincidences that as soon as the alleged Ark was found (along with the other ancient discoveries), there were invasions to these countries that just so happened to eradicate any evidence of it. Very strange, indeed…

 

Again, I want to reiterate that some of my thoughts and theories may be way off base, and I also research some other things on the side as well to try and get a broader understanding of what I’m reading, so please bear with me, or, even better, if you have insights that bring more light to these verses, please let me know.

I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other and love to hear other people’s perspectives on things. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Earnest Examination

Genesis 16: Hagar and Ishmael - Earnest Examination
Genesis 14: Abram Rescues Lot - Earnest Examination
Genesis 13: Abram Inherits Canaan - Earnest Examination
Genesis 12: The Call of Abram - Earnest Examination
Genesis 11: The Tower of Babel - Earnest Examination
Genesis 10: The Table of Nations - Earnest Examination
Genesis 8: Noah’s Deliverance - Earnest Examination
Genesis 7: The Flood Begins - Earnest Examination

Genesis 7: The Flood Begins

Earnest Examination

This series is presented as an honest, sincere look into the study of the Bible with my own personal theories, opinions, comments and that of others’ insights and research into what the verses could mean. I cannot claim one way or another that everything that I am stating is fact and the true meaning of what is meant in these verses.

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

All verses used are from biblestudytools.com (NIV) Genesis 7

The Flood Begins

1 The LORD then said to Noah, “Go into the ark, you and your whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation.
It is very telling that out of the population that lived during the pre-diluvian days, ONLY eight people were found to have been righteous. The population of those days have been estimated from anywhere from 5 million, all the way up to 4 billion and beyond. Now when you think about that in context, 8 people, out of – let’s take the lowest number of 5 MILLION, which is still quite a lot of people. That’s 0.0000016% of people that were found to be righteous and worthy of being saved during that generation. Now let’s take 4 billion. That equates to 0.000000002% of the population found worthy of being saved. That is a really tragic percentage. How many of us can say that we would be within that 0.000000002 to 0.0000016%? If today’s population is approximately 7.8 billion people, then according to these estimations, at the lowest end, only about 16 people would be found worthy of being saved. That’s if the wickedness in today’s time is similar to that of Noah’s. (My belief is that it’s not as bad, and I truly believe that many in today’s time have a good heart, even if we’re not perfect. Our hearts are not always wicked and immoral. Although for some individuals the same cannot be said.)
Another thing I’ve questioned: I was always taught that Noah was trying to warn people that a flood was coming, but no one believed him. (Was Noah the first “conspiracy theorist” that people laughed at and ridiculed? 😛 ) However, when I researched this, I’ve found no indication that Noah actually did this, unless one assumes the verse “preacher of righteousness” in 2 Peters 2:5 to indicate that Noah warned others. “Preacher of righteousness” could mean anything. That he tried to teach others to repent and walk away from sin. That he tried to teach them to love and follow the one true God. Or perhaps he was trying to teach his generation to treat each other with respect and kindness. All of the above, even. But it doesn’t specify that Noah exclusively was warning them of an impending flood and to prepare and repent.

2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate,
3 and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth.

We saw in the previous chapter, that the verses definitively stated “two of all living creatures“, however, here we see it specifying that the “clean animals” were to be brought in at 7 pairs (14 animals each) and the “unclean animals” at just 1 pair (2 animals each). That is, if none of these verses have been mistranslated or misunderstood since it was written. And as of yet, we don’t know what they mean by “clean/unclean”, although we learn their descriptions in a different book.
4 Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth every living creature I have made.”
I don’t know if I’m being too analytical, but is this Bible verse specifically alluding to only the creatures that God has made? What does that mean, exactly? There’s a theory that since the fallen angels came down to corrupt God’s creation, that all creation is not technically from God. If the theory of the Nephilim and the fallen angel’s interference to invert and contort everything that God made as a means of rebellion, then would that still be under God’s jurisdiction? It’s such a controversial topic and I cannot say one way or another what the true account is.
5 And Noah did all that the LORD commanded him.
6 Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters came on the earth.
7 And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives entered the ark to escape the waters of the flood.
8 Pairs of clean and unclean animals, of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground,
9 male and female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah.
10 And after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth.
11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened.
12 And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.

So not only did it rain for forty days and forty nights, but there was also the eruptions of the springs (geysers) that helped to flood the entire world. Were the springs erupting continuously during these times? Just out of morbid curiosity, did the people and animals being swept away by the flood also have to contend with boiling hot water due to these springs? Or am I, again, just being “too questionable”?
13 On that very day Noah and his sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, together with his wife and the wives of his three sons, entered the ark.
14 They had with them every wild animal according to its kind, all livestock according to their kinds, every creature that moves along the ground according to its kind and every bird according to its kind, everything with wings.
15 Pairs of all creatures that have the breath of life in them came to Noah and entered the ark.
This verse is very strange to me. Why would the Bible need to mention “all creatures that have the breath of life in them”? I mean, obviously animals that don’t have the breath of life in them are dead… therefore couldn’t possibly bring themselves to Noah’s ark. It seems very bizarre to me that this verse has to state this. Does the “breath of life” mean something different than what we think it means? Could it mean, a spirituality of sorts? A consciousness? A soul, even? Does this verse imply that there could be creatures among us that don’t necessary have the “breath of life” but are (were) walking among us?
There’s been debates that cloning and hybridization and genetic manipulation has been around for a lot longer than we can imagine. Could it be that due to all of this experimentation, that “living” beings could exist without actually having the essence of God? A “soulless” being, if you will?

16 The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in.
And again, as was mentioned in the previous chapter, there are many verses that make it clear that Noah brought in “male and female” of every living thing. Almost as if the Bible was foreshadowing the movement we have today which is normalizing what the Bible calls unnatural and immoral unions of the same gender.

(Now, if one were to dig deep into this rabbit hole, some speculate that it could be due to our leftover feelings of reincarnation, for one. If one were to incarnate many times throughout their lives as both male and female, then perhaps these residual memories of their fondness for the other gender is confusing them in their current lifetime. Then others have pointed to nefarious human experimentation on our genes and our sexual preference, and even twisting our minds to feel as if this is perfectly normal and acceptable. As well as a whole other slew of different possibilities.
Whichever the case, no matter your stance, I do want to mention to still treat each other with love, kindness and respect. We may all be at the mercy of underhanded corporations that are trying to infiltrate every fiber of our mind, body and soul, so having compassion and understanding towards one another will go a long way rather than demonizing and/or harshly criticizing.)

17 For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters increased they lifted the ark high above the earth.
18 The waters rose and increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the water.
19 They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered.
20 The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits.
21 Every living thing that moved on land perished—birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind.
Fifteen cubits would be a little over 22 feet, covering over what’s assumed to be the highest mountain. However, the Bible really doesn’t address tunnels, caves, etc. If some people (nephilim, even?) lived in these closed off tunnels, caves, etc. could they have been spared from the flood? The Bible indicates that “every living thing” perished. So I would assume that even if they had caves/mineshafts, underground shelters of sorts, it still didn’t protect them.
But another thing to note, it again doesn’t address these giant nephilim, or the “sons of god” that helped to create them. “All animals and all mankind.” Well, nephilim and the sons of god would not fall under these definitions. Possibly not even defined as “living being”. If these fallen angels were considered as spirits, then could they have possibly wandered around until these flood waters subsided, and once again resumed their habitation of mankind?

22 Everything on dry land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died.
23 Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; people and animals and the creatures that move along the ground and the birds were wiped from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark.
Again, if we are to believe that EVERYONE on the planet was wiped out due to the flood besides Noah and his immediate family and his sons’ wives, then we have to believe that any corrupted individuals that are living today are descendants of Noah and his clan. We all would be descendants, as a matter of fact.
And even though the previous chapter specifically alludes to the fallen angels and nephilim and this presumably led to the wickedness of men, any conclusion of their whereabouts are suspiciously not mentioned. Unless, of course, we are to assume that they are part of the “living creatures” and “mankind” that were all destroyed because of the flood. In my point of view, this is not conclusive and leaves an empty hole to fill.

24 The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days.

I find the story of the flood missing some crucial information. I don’t want to sound paranoid, but it almost seems like there are specific passages, chapters even, (perhaps whole books?) that have been deliberately left out or, dare I say it, covered up. It’s been known throughout history that there were different agendas and goals to keep certain information from reaching the public, and I think the story of the “sons of god” and the nephilim are one of them. The previous chapter makes note that this “unholy union” between the angels and daughters of men led to the wickedness of mankind which ultimately led to the flood. And yet there aren’t many mentions beyond Genesis 6 and Numbers 13 to give us any more information. Perhaps with further research more details will emerge to connect the dots a little better.

Again, I want to reiterate that some of my thoughts and theories may be way off base, and I also research some other things on the side as well to try and get a broader understanding of what I’m reading, so please bear with me, or, even better, if you have insights that bring more light to these verses, please let me know.

I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other and love to hear other people’s perspectives on things. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.