Further Proof That Our Connection to God and Our Belief System is Under Attack: “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation – Decreased Beliefs in God, Angels and Heaven”

Has it all been boiling down to a transhumanist/one world religion this whole time?

As news of the 2005 Pentagon video detailing the FunVax/VMAT2/God Gene efforts to create a respiratory virus and/or vaccine to inhibit religious/spiritual inclinations has gained traction, there is another study that’s been done that deserves a more studious look as well.

In an article dated 2015, it seems to be piggybacking on the findings that were revealed by the FunVax Pentagon video. And strangely enough, while scientists and researchers have been finding magnetic properties inside of the COVID vaccines – and thus, transferred to humans, the title of the article gives us a disturbing look at what may be possible due to this invasive technology:

Disabling parts of the brain with magnets can weaken faith in God and change attitudes to immigrants, study finds” (October 15, 2015)

Some key notes from this article:

“A joint team of American and British scientists have discovered that powerful magnetic pulses to the brain can temporarily change people’s feelings on a variety of subjects – from their belief in God, to their attitude to immigration.”

“The two were split into two groups – one, the control group, was given a sham dose of magnetism that was not strong enough to influence brain activity.

The other got a strong pulse of TMS [Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation] that was strong enough to temporarily shut down their posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), a part of the brain that “plays a key role in both detecting discrepancies between desired and current conditions and adjusting subsequent behaviour to resolve such conflicts.”

“Amongst those who received the strong magnetic dose, 32.8 percent fewer had decreased beliefs in God, angels and heaven compared to the control group who received no dose.”

The wording is admittedly a little strange here. It can be re-worded to say, “32.8 percent less belief in God, angels and heaven”.

“Whether we’re dealing with everyday threats, such as security at work, or more abstract ones, such as the idea of God and death or the issue of immigration, our brains are using the same basic structure – and its activity can be reduced with magnetic fields.”

For me, personally, I do not find the idea of God or death as a threat. But what I DO find as a threat is the idea that people have the capability to tinker in people’s brains and are able to diminish our foundational beliefs.

THAT’S threatening.

And how strange that they are researching how to shut off our capacity to perceive a potential threat. It wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that they recognize that they, themselves, are the threat, would it?…

They also acknowledge that a belief in religious ideas can be comforting, especially at the prospect of death.

“Dr Keise Izuma, of the authors of the study from the University of York, said: “As expected, we found that when we experimentally turned down the posterior medial frontal cortex, people were less inclined to reach for comforting religious ideas despite having been reminded of death.”

Yet, because of their experiments and the amount of TSM dosage they used, they were able to lessen this inclination in some of the people.

A short summary of the study that the article is based upon:

“- experimentally decreased both avowed belief in God and out-group derogation by downregulating pMFC activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation. The results provide the first evidence that group prejudice and religious belief are susceptible to targeted neuromodulation

Neuromodulation of group prejudice and religious belief (September 2015)

There is also a video which shows TMS workers Choi Deblieck (one of the authors cited on the “Neuromodulation of group prejudice and religious belief” article) and Alyssa Hindle demonstrating how the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation works.

(Keep in mind, while this work was done in 2014, there is a common understanding that the technology we see is but a mere fraction of what is currently available. There are estimates that some of the military technology, for example, can be up to 50 years ahead of its time, if not even further.)

Source: youtube | Alyssa Hindle | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Demonstration

While they show a headpiece being necessary to stimulate this type of response, we must be aware that there are efforts to be able to induce this type of reaction without the use of gadgets. This is also only showing what can they manipulate in our physical body through transcranial means – it does not show what effect it has on the brain and how this type of device can tune down our belief in God. But according to their studies, this is a possibility.

DARPA is heavily invested in this type of research

James Giordano, a doctor that specializes in neurotechnology and who has worked with DARPA, admits that one of their key goals is to “affect the ticking and tocking of the brain” in order to influence “the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions of those individuals”. During one of his lectures, transcribed in full here, he states about transcranial neuromodulation:

“Clearly one of the things we can also do is transcranial neuromodulation. The idea of going through the skull to modulate the node network activity of the brain, to optimize the performance of key individuals in certain tasks and performances that are relative to the missional space, and we can also do that against hostile or perhaps belligerent others.

“So how then, can we use these elements as weapons? Means of contending against others? Formal definition of a weapon, right under the Oxford Old English Dictionary: ‘means of contending against others’. And we can do that in a number of ways. We can militate their behaviors and their thoughts in some ways as to make them more amenable to what we do. The idea of positive weaponology. Or we can in fact mitigate, and in some cases, completely nullify their capability, will, or engagement to fight.

“we’re talking about the transcranial devices, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transporting electrical stimulation

“Can we engage certain brain substrates, nodes and networks, through the use of new pharmaceuticals or older pharmaceuticals that are re-dosed, or pharmaceutically delivered in different ways

– James Giordano / The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future

Let’s hypothesize for a moment that if people are being injected with graphene oxide, like doctors and scientists are purportedly finding in the COVID vaccines, their body now essentially becomes an antenna able to receive this stimuli through, perhaps, 5G towers, satellites, DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), EMF (Electromagnetic field), etc. – all wirelessly.

“Graphene and graphene derivatives (e.g., graphene oxide (GO)) have been incorporated into hydrogels to improve the properties (e.g., mechanical strength) of conventional hydrogels and/or develop new functions (e.g., electrical conductivity and drug loading/delivery).”

Graphene oxide-incorporated hydrogels for biomedical applications

“Nanocomposites based on magnetic GO (MGO) [Magnetic Graphene Oxide] possess unique properties; they have a high specific surface area, surface-active sites, excellent magnetic characteristics, high chemical stability, an adjustable size and shape, and can be simply functionalized or modified.”

Silica Magnetic Graphene Oxide Improves the Effects of Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium on Acute Liver Failure

Combine all of this knowledge with James Giordano’s assertions and the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation studies, along with more of DARPA’s research:

“Recent DARPA-funded research has demonstrated that human brains sense magnetic fields, like those used by animals for navigation, and that this process is ‘jammed’ (i.e., disrupted) by radio waves (RF), impacting brainwaves and behavior.

STTR: HR001120S0019-18 Impact of Cockpit Electro-Magnetics on Aircrew Neurology (ICEMAN)

This, however, seems to be implying that no invasive therapeutics (like graphene oxide?) are necessary, but all of the studies combined seems to indicate that a substance like graphene oxide, nanoparticles, hydrogels, etc. can induce a stronger response – which is, of course, what the neuroscientists want to achieve.

In another DARPA invested study, we have the “Magneto” protein:

“Researchers in the United States have developed a new method for controlling the brain circuits associated with complex animal behaviours, using genetic engineering to create a magnetised protein that activates specific groups of nerve cells from a distance.”

“Several earlier studies have shown that nerve cell proteins which are activated by heat and mechanical pressure can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves and magnetic fields, by attaching them to an iron-storing protein called ferritin, or to inorganic paramagnetic particles.”

“Next, the researchers inserted the Magneto DNA sequence into the genome of a virus, together with the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and regulatory DNA sequences that cause the construct to be expressed only in specified types of neurons. They then injected the virus into the brains of mice, targeting the entorhinal cortex, and dissected the animals’ brains to identify the cells that emitted green fluorescence. Using microelectrodes, they then showed that applying a magnetic field to the brain slices activated Magneto so that the cells produce nervous impulses.”

“This shows that Magneto can remotely control the firing of neurons deep within the brain, and also control complex behaviours.”

Genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein remotely controls brain and behaviour

And let’s, of course, not forget about DARPA’s involvements with several prominent vaccine companies…

Moderna

“Prior to the worldwide lockdowns in 2020, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were surreptitiously working on a new mRNA vaccine platform using a new biotech company called Moderna. Their strategic planning began in 2013, when DARPA funds were used by Moderna to invent methods for inducing a short-lived immune response through administration of mRNA vaccines.”

BOMBSHELL: DARPA was secretly developing the mRNA vaccine years ago through Moderna, and they seek permanent control over your body and bloodline

Pfizer

“The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) awarded Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) a $7.7 million contract to research whether it might be possible to “identify and subsequently induce the production of protective antibodies to an emerging pathogen directly in an infected or exposed individual.”

DARPA Hires Pfizer to Perform Groundbreaking Vaccine Research

AstraZeneca

“The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) have reached an interagency agreement with AstraZeneca to support phase 1 clinical development of a monoclonal antibody combination therapy for use against COVID-19.”

BARDA, DARPA support AstraZeneca through phase 1 trial of COVID-19 therapeutic

How altruistic of DARPA to fund the top 3 pharmaceutical companies who are manufacturing these COVID vaccines worldwide in order to stop this deadly coronavirus from spreading. Certainly it wouldn’t have anything to do with their ongoing projects to control “the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions” of everyone.

Who is directing the “narrative”?

And to tie this all back together with religion, with more of the U.S. government’s involvement, including DARPA again in some statements, is a familiar TMS study also conducted around the 2012-2013 timeframe… the same timeframe that DARPA was making contracts with Pfizer and Moderna…

“This project investigates cognitive activity and narrative in the context of persuasive rhetoric in a multidisciplinary manner that significantly advances the knowledge base of neuroscience, narrative studies, and social and cognitive psychology. A critical goal of the project is to come to a greater understanding of the role narrative plays in encouraging individuals to support or participate in political violence and be subject to extremist recruitment.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

Huh. According to this summary, one of their main focal points is to determine how “narrative” plays a role in influencing emotions and behaviors.

narrative:
      1. A narrated account; a story.
      2. The art, technique, or process of narrating.
      3. The presentation of the positions of a politician or political party in the media, as by press releases, speeches, and interviews.

wordnik.com/narrative

Additional sections of the “narrative” study:

“Generally, participants will view a series of video vignettes that either map or do not map local narratives onto a master narrative framework drawn from their religious affiliation (Christian or Muslim).”

“Finally, participants attitudes and behaviors will be measured to assess how vertical integration influences beliefs and persuasion.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

Vertical integration? Kind of like how Pope Francis (Christian supposedly…) and Ahmed el-Tayeb (Muslim) signed a “Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together“, which upholds “The firm conviction that authentic teachings of religions invite us to remain rooted in the values of peace; to defend the values of mutual understanding, human fraternity and harmonious coexistence”? (and doesn’t mention Jesus Christ once?)

The same Pope Francis who states on one hand, in this very same document, that “We therefore condemn all those practices that are a threat to life such as genocide, acts of terrorism, forced displacement, trafficking in human organs, abortion and euthanasia. We likewise condemn the policies that promote these practices.”, while on the other hand announces that COVID vaccines that are derived from aborted fetuses are morally acceptable?

And not only did he state that the vaccines are morally acceptable, but has also promoted vaccine mandates for all?

The same Pope Francis that allowed the statue of Moloch to be displayed outside the Roman Colosseum?

As an aside, but still very pertinent to this topic, is to be aware of declarations of “false peace” – which is what the Document of Human Fraternity seems to be all about.

“Now as to the times and the epochs, brethren, you have no need of anything to be written to you. For you yourselves know full well that the day of the Lord will come just like a thief in the night. While they are saying, “Peace and safety!” then destruction will come upon them suddenly like labor pains upon a woman with child, and they will not escape.”1 Thessalonians 5:1-3

“They have healed the brokenness of My people superficially,
Saying, ‘Peace, peace,’
But there is no peace.”
Jeremiah 6:14

“But, “Ah, Lord God!” I said, “Look, the prophets are telling them, ‘You will not see the sword nor will you have famine, but I will give you lasting peace in this place.’” Then the Lord said to me, “The prophets are prophesying falsehood in My name. I have neither sent them nor commanded them nor spoken to them; they are prophesying to you a false vision, divination, futility and the deception of their own minds.”Jeremiah 14:13-14

“Do not drag me away with the wicked
And with those who work iniquity,
Who speak peace with their neighbors,
While evil is in their hearts.”
Psalm 28:3

One last section of the narrative/TMS study to influence our thoughts and belief structures:

“we will manipulate theoretically and empirically (from Phase 1) derived aspects of narrative validity and transportation to influence vertical integration and persuasion

“In Phase 3, we will selectively alter aspects of narrative structure and brain functioning via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to induce or disrupt selective features of narrative processing, to provide the strongest possible inferences about the operation of the narrative comprehension network.”

” – includes funding to support adding 20 additional subjects, to add a condition (an additional religious group) to our design to provide better experimental control.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

And with these capabilities to shut down and/or change our belief/connection with God, what then happens when something like Voice-to-Skull technology (another DARPA invention) is employed? We would no longer have any discernment or intuition skills in determining if this is coming from the Creator or beamed into us by an agency posing as “God” or the “Messiah”, Buddha, Shiva, etc., etc.

It would seem that these studies can imply one very significant directive in which our societies are inevitably heading towards – that of a One World Religion and One World Order.

Interestingly, Chrislam – a movement that came about due to Pope Francis’ and Ahmed el-Tayeb’s fraternity partnership, has been building a “trinity” of worship places consisting of the church, synagogue, and mosque known as the Abrahamic Family House; set to open this year (2022).

The Bible prophesizes that an agenda similar to the “New World Order” will happen, whether we like it or not. And if it involves our own thoughts, emotions, feelings, attitudes, beliefs being manipulated in whatever way they can to influence us to accepting this, then one of our main defenses is to build up our awareness, our discernment, our very own frequency, perhaps, so that we will be able to resist these attempts. And stay strong in our faith in God and the Lord Jesus Christ, so that we will be able to avoid these deceptive tactics.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by J F from Pixabay

Genesis 16: Hagar and Ishmael

Earnest Examination

This series is presented as an honest, sincere look into the study of the Bible with my own personal theories, opinions, comments and that of others’ insights and research into what the verses could mean. I cannot claim one way or another that everything that I am stating is fact and the true meaning of what is meant in these verses.

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

Version used is from (KJV) Genesis 16

1 Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.
2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.

It’s interesting how even though Abram trusted in the Lord that he will have descendants that come from his own body, it did not occur to him that it would come from his own wife, Sarai. Instead, because Sarai thought that she could not bear children, then his descendants would have to come from someone else. Thereby offering up her handmaid so that her husband could have children through his bloodline. Was this planned by God all along? If God is omnipresent and omniscient, then He would already know that this is how the story is going to play out.
3 And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.
4 And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.
I do want to make another point here, about who many believe wrote Genesis to begin with. Of course this question brings up many debates, but the person most referenced as having written Genesis is Moses. Whether that be from word of mouth and passed down traditions and tales, or whether perhaps he had the testimony dictated to him by an angel of the Lord, or the Lord Himself, it is interesting that a lot of these passed down tales give us an inner look into the emotions and feelings of others. Was there written dictation that Hagar began to hate her mistress? Was there proof of some sort that there was animosity brewing between the two because Hagar felt herself better than Sarai because she can conceive and Sarai couldn’t? And this brings into question how these texts could have been written with the knowledge of what people were feeling and thinking. Yes, God would be able to know how everyone’s feeling, so could it be possible that whoever did write Genesis gets insights into everyone’s thoughts and feelings? And if certain chapters were dictated, how can we be, FOR SURE, that the dictation came from an angel of the Lord, or the Lord Himself? Or even if they came from visions or dreams? How can we be sure that these visions/dreams/etc. were not misconstrued?
I also want to bring up the emotion of Hagar herself for her thoughts of pride for being able to conceive and thinking herself better than someone else because of this. I don’t want to judge this characteristic, because I don’t know what’s going on in her mind/thoughts, but thought it was an interesting perspective. Of course this particular version of the text does not reference Hagar’s complete feelings to Sarai like others do, like the NIV for instance. The NIV gives a little more context to this relationship.

5 And Sarai said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes: the LORD judge between me and thee.
6 But Abram said unto Sarai, Behold, thy maid is in thy hand; do to her as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled from her face.
Here is another reference to Sarai and Hagar’s relationship, which was never brought up before Hagar became pregnant with Abram’s child. And another wrongdoing, even though it was Sarai’s idea to have Hagar become Abram’s wife as well specifically to have children through her. I also want to make note that at this point, it doesn’t seem as if the Lord has given any instruction as to how to live one’s life. The 10 commandments were not created yet, and the word Love has not even been mentioned yet other than in reference to procreation as can be seen in NIV Genesis 4. In fact, it won’t be mentioned for a few more chapters, and even in that context, as we will see, I have issues with.
So at this point in the Bible, it would appear that people have no way of knowing how to treat each other. We can see such disrespect coming from Hagar to Sarai, and Sarai to Hagar, with not a mention of compassion or kindness. In fact, the last few chapters dealt with gain as far as land and wealth and bloodlines. It’s fascinating that Love has not even been a component yet. Even at the creation of Adam and Eve and the love of a husband and wife, or the love for their children.

7 And the angel of the LORD found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur.
8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s maid, whence camest thou? and whither wilt thou go? And she said, I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai.

The phrase “the angel of the Lord” grabs my attention and to me, implies that this angel is special in some way. Why “THE” angel? Not “an” angel? Why is there this implication that it is not just a “random” angel of the Lord that came to Hagar, but the angel of the Lord? What does this mean? Does this angel have some sort of significance? There are indications of heirarchies within the angelic/heavenly realm, so does this angel hold a particular importance or certain leadership quality that others angels wouldn’t?
9 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.
10 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.
This gives me an even deeper impression that this angel, for some reason, holds more weight than the others. Why would this angel specifically say, “I will multiply thy seed”? Wouldn’t that be something that the Lord would say? If the angel is speaking for the Lord, then the wording, I would think, would be more like, “The Lord will multiply thy seed”. Not I, as in the angel itself.
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Just a quick note, “Ishmael” means “God listens.” or “God will hear.” or similar variants to this.
12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
So why would this be? This sounds like more of a curse than a blessing. Is this “angel of the Lord” merely warning Hagar that this is how her son will be considered? Is it just what was in Ishmael’s destiny? There are theories that Ishmael’s descendants are known today as the Muslims, or Arabs, Arabian Muslims, with some history provided by Muhammad/Quran.
So another question I have is, if the angel never mentioned that Ishmael would grow up to be at odds with every man, would this prophecy still play out as told? Did the angel’s prophetic warning have anything to do with how Hagar raised Ishmael, with the expectation that he would be against others and others against him? Did the angel set the precedent with this foretelling?

13 And she called the name of the LORD that spake unto her, Thou God seest me: for she said, Have I also here looked after him that seeth me?
Hm… now I’m really confused. The angel of the Lord was speaking to Hagar… so why is this verse now considering him the Lord? And if this was the angel of the Lord, then surely the text would clearly imply again “the angel of the Lord”. Not “name of the Lord that spake unto her.” Unless it is indicating that by being addressed by this angel, she realizes that Thou God, meaning the angel’s God, and thus God Himself, has seen her in her distress and is appealing to her to return to Sarai even amidst all of the hostility. It still does not explain though why in this verse the angel is considered the Lord… Could “the angel of the Lord” be the Holy Spirit? Therefore indeed a significant part of God? Or perhaps as some theories speculate, could it be the Christ Consciousness before Jesus Christ was incarnate? Even so, the strange prediction that Ishmael will play a substantial role in his dealings with other mankind sets an interesting and perplexing anecdote, as if setting the stage for what is to come.
14 Wherefore the well was called Beerlahairoi; behold, it is between Kadesh and Bered.
15 And Hagar bare Abram a son: and Abram called his son’s name, which Hagar bare, Ishmael.
16 And Abram was fourscore and six years old, when Hagar bare Ishmael to Abram.

Throughout this chapter, I have to bring up again how interesting it is that the one message that Jesus Christ teaches, of Love to God and to each other, has not been mentioned yet. In fact, like I stated above, Love is not even a factor and has not been mentioned in Genesis yet, from Adam and Eve’s creation, to Abram’s timeline, 2,000 years since the beginning, according to the Bible. Has this concept, this feeling, not have even manifested yet? Are humans at this point of time just multiplying out of duty to keep one’s heritage/bloodline going? We can see how people have treated each other throughout all of this, with brother against brother, son against father, woman against woman due to pride, jealousy, envy, etc., etc., etc. I think Love will be a specific recurring topic that I will keep a very close eye on going forward.

 

As usual, I want to reiterate that some of my thoughts and theories may be way off base, and I also research some other things on the side as well to try and get a broader understanding of what I’m reading, so please bear with me, or, even better, if you have insights that bring more light to these verses, please let me know.

I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other and love to hear other people’s perspectives on things. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!