Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates

Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.

Somewhat of a disclaimer: I put “may” in the title of this post to deflect direct allegations that “may” end up turning out to be false. Of course, in the world we find ourselves in, where money, power and hidden motives rule, it seems the same key players are involved, over and over again. I’d say that is no coincidence and holds incredible importance when addressing the strange situations that are occurring around us.

I also focus on the names given above because they are the most prominent figure-heads of the “health initiative” and have high-ranking positions who may also just happened to have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Again, coincidence? I’m inclined not to think so.

Why is bringing up connections of Jeffrey Epstein to the NIH and the Human Genome Project so important?

Well, other than the obvious reasons (convicted serial pedophile and blackmail extraordinaire – along with Ghislaine Maxwell, currently under trial) are the incredibly suspicious interests that Epstein has divulged and perhaps invested in to further his goals.

Take the following, for consideration:

“- He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women / Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies

– longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence

– Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

– Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.”

Original source: Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA
Alternative source found here: [ https://storageunit.home.blog/2020/02/17/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna-at-zorro-ranch/ ]

Some studies that Jeffrey Epstein supported and sponsored are the following:

(all 4 published wholly or in part by Martin A. Nowak – “Professor of Mathematics and of Biology at Harvard University. He works on the mathematical description of evolutionary processes, including the evolution of cooperation and human language, as well as the dynamics of virus infections and human cancer” [ https://oeb.harvard.edu/people/martin-nowak ])

2006[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279745/ ] “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”

“Support from the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2007[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387227/ ] “Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs”

“Support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) (M.A.N.) and FCT-Portugal (J.M.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2008[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567469/ ] “Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology (NIH Grant R01GM078986), and J. Epstein.”

2010[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842638/ ] “Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Joint Program in Mathematical Biology (National Institutes of Health grant R01GM078986) and J. Epstein.”

Of course, the studies mentioned above are all tied into one particular grant, by the NIH, no less. And again, as a reminder, who is the head (soon to be former) of the NIH? Mr. Francis Collins (who is also known for his leadership position of the Human Genome Project), who is to step down from the NIH role at the end of the year, but yet continue his research at his lab.

And that of course ties into with Anthony Fauci as a close colleague and friend of Francis Collins, and as most of us know about Fauci, is the lead of the Coronavirus Task Force and director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – a branch within the NIH) – and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Mrs. Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci and also Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

But that also brings up a Mr. Eric Lander, well known for his work on the Human Genome Project, who has met Jeffrey Epstein at least twice, according to records. Does this necessarily mean that Eric Lander was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and all of the allegations and crimes he has been engaged in? Of course not. But it does set a suspicious light in regards to Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationships to other scientific researchers, who many have alleged to have known about Epstein’s interests and various fundings into these projects, not to mention his sordid history. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein was quite a prolific (no pun intended) character in the scientific and medical community.

And it would make sense that someone with money, plus a sinister desire to populate the world with his offspring, would attempt to get close to those who could further his goals. So for multiple scientists and researchers to have a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein would not be unheard of. However, this points a very specific light on those who do seem to entertain Mr. Epstein’s ideals.

And now with Mr. Eric Lander, selected by Joe Biden as the head of the Science and Technology division,

Jeffrey Epstein (left), Eric Lander (right)

it makes one wonder, to what degree would money be a motivational factor, even if ideologies differ? Would some scientists care? There would not only be excessive financial compensation, but it may also satiate a scientific curiosity of a “what if” scenario.

Then of course we have to mention Bill Gates, who isn’t necessarily a scientist or medical researcher, but who has “philanthropic” ventures into transhumanism, synthetic meat, genetically modifying products and human beings, as it is, despite what “fact-checkers” try to refute.

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics. In 2014, the World Health Organization issued guidelines for testing genetically modified mosquitoes, including standards for efficacy, biosafety, bioethics, and public participation. In 2016, the National Academy of Sciences built on the WHO’s guidelines with recommendations for responsible conduct in gene-drive research on animals. (The Gates Foundation co-funded this work with the National Institutes of Health, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.)”

[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-04-10/gene-editing-good?linkId=50322894 ] “Gene Editing for Good | How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development” by Bill Gates

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics.”

…Well, it’s a good thing Bill Gates is such good friends with Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, both of whom work in the NIH and have leadership roles; including Fauci’s wife, head of Bioethics at the NIH. Very useful and convenient, I’m sure.

And who, by several accounts, has met with Jeffrey Epstein not once, not twice, but NUMEROUS times.

“In fact, beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times.”

Bill Gates (left), Francis Collins (middle), Anthony Fauci (right) – Source: nih.gov

Now, of course we can’t claim “guilty by association”, right? But what about when the individuals/institutions listed above have direct funding and sponsorships from Jeffrey Epstein and sit on the Board of Directors of these very organizations? Can they claim plausible deniability?

“Even though Epstein did not donate to PED or Harvard after 2007, he played an “indirect but significant role” in facilitating a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to PED in 2015.”

Epstein, Martin Nowak, Eric Lander, MIT and a very sinister genome project tied to the Covid test

“Epstein had suggested at one point that the John Templeton Foundation could match any donations dollar for dollar. Unfortunately for Ito and Epstein, a spokesperson for the Foundation could find no record of Epstein’s plan, and provided no funding, according to Farrow.”

MIT’s Media Lab Director Resigns From NYT Company Board After Pocketing Millions In ‘Anonymous’ Epstein Donations

Although these two statements seem to contradict each other, and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as a sponsor on Martin A. Nowak’s published studies (unless we are to conclude that Mr. Nowak is lying about his sponsorships; though in light of multiple various sources agreeing that this was a huge interest of Epstein, and with proof of various meetings with those in higher positions, the supposition that Mr. Nowak is lying is highly unlikely), we can’t ignore the fact that anonymous donors and facilitators were likely happening, especially when groups/foundations involved knew what kind of detrimental publicity would arise from a known connection with this infamous criminal.

Continuing on with the John Templeton Foundation, who named Francis Collins as the recipient of the 2020 Templeton Award, and who was involved in the very studies that Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded, according to the ncbi/pubmed articles listed above (of which were also supported by a NIH grant, I should add) also sponsors BioLogos, a “Christian” outlet founded by Francis Collins who is eager to combine science and religion together. Make no mistake, the material exposed on the BioLogos site is meant to lead Christians astray; with many articles a propaganda piece to influence and convince Christians that getting the vaccine is for the betterment of humankind.

But again, this still raises the issue that even if Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci aren’t directly involved with Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates is, and seems to be a very significant one at that. With such financial sway and investments, including funding and sponsorships of numerous organizations, largely of which consist of pharmaceutical companies that just so happen to be insisting that everyone on the planet needs to take these mRNA/DNA “vaccines” – and when researching their possible involvement in CRISPR technology as well – this sets a very alarming precedence on who’s really in charge of our health system.

So again, why is it such a concern that the heads of the National Institutes of Health, and the heads of the Human Genome Projects, and prominent scientists/researchers, and professors at acclaimed universities, and billionaire philanthropists who have a vested interest in CRISPR/gene editing technology, have such business (and perhaps personal) ties and gains related to a man who wanted to populate the world with his seed and went so far as developing a “breeding ranch” and funded studies devoted to human evolution?

The answer speaks for itself, honestly.

Now, with all of Epstein’s connections and influence, not to mention all of his funding of numerous projects, are we to really believe that those involved with his projects have the best interest of humankind at heart? The same people, mind you, who are directly involved with pushing a “COVID vaccine” on the WHOLE WORLD?

And are we to really believe that the Director of the NIH, Francis Collins, and Eric Lander, a very prominent figure in the scientific community, including at Harvard and MIT:

“An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.”

[ https://chinaus-icas.org/biden-administration-international-affairs-personnel-tracker/biden-personnel-tracker-climate-health-and-technology/eric-lander-presidential-science-advisor-director-of-the-ostp/ ]

had NO idea about Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement in these studies, supported by the very same institutions they oversee? This either speaks to their complicity, or their ineptitude in directing these organizations. Is this an unfair assessment? Does it instead speak of the inherent flaws (or perhaps strengths, depending on who’s looking at it) of compartmentalization and the excessive ways it can get out of control without proper supervision? But this would ultimately ignore the very real dilemma of bribery, coercion, threats and blackmail – of which Mr. Jeffrey Epstein seems to have been adept in and the center of in various circles.

With credentials such as boasting of sponsoring scientific giants, some of which have won the Nobel Prize:

“The Foundation has also had the priviledge of sponsoring many prominent scientists including Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Eric Lander, George Church, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, Lee Smolin and Gregory Benford and Nobel laureates, Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.” – Web archive: Jeffrey Epstein Ideas Forum

we have to ask ourselves, why would Jeffrey Epstein lie about Eric Lander, out of everyone? Are we sure he embellished his sponsorships, as multiple articles claim? Or is perhaps the person who has been chosen as President Joe Biden’s top Science Advisor and Director of OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) denying such claims in order to preserve his own reputation? In the same sense, wouldn’t a person selected for such a prestigious title undergo a stringent selective process, including investigations of past connections and potential involvement in secret programs?

That is, of course, if the presidential/government committees aren’t involved in it themselves…

One last note: am I saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind behind these nefarious ideas? No. I think there were individuals above him who were directing where these studies and blackmailing efforts were going and who keep themselves largely hidden from the public eye; and who, in my opinion, may have supplied Epstein’s budget. There may also have been connections with certain alphabet agencies involved in these schemes, although these suspicions remain to be substantiated.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
VMAT2 “God Gene” Has Been Studied Extensively Throughout the Years – And is Being Used in CRISPR Studies/Vaccines - According to studies, scientists can manipulate and "tightly experimentally tune" our level of spirituality.

CDC Says Vaccinated May be as Likely to Spread COVID as Unvaxxed, as Reports of Serious Injuries after Vaccines Surge

“The bottom line was that, in contrast to the other variants, vaccinated people, even if they didn’t get sick, got infected and shed virus at similar levels as unvaccinated people who got infected”

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 518,770 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 11,940 deaths and 63,102 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 23, 2021.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed total reports of serious injuries following COVID vaccination, across all age groups, spiked by 14,717 — to 63,000 — compared with the previous week.

The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Data released today show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 23, 2021, a total of 518,770 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 11,940 deaths — an increase of 535 over the previous week. There were 63,102 serious injuries reported during the same time period — up 14,717 compared with the previous week.

From the 7/23/21 Release of VAERS data

Excluding “foreign reports” filed in VAERS, 435,007 adverse events, including 5,612 deaths and 34,890 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S.

In the U.S., 340.4 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of July 23. This includes: 137 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 189 million doses of Pfizer and 13 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.

Of the 5,612 U.S. deaths reported as of July 23, 14% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 20% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 34% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

  • 15,086 total adverse events, including 909 rated as serious and 16 reported deathsone less than what VAERS showed last week. Two of the nine deaths were suicides.
  • The most recent reported deaths include a 13-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1463061) who died after receiving a Moderna vaccine, a 16-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1466009) who died after receiving his second dose of Pfizer and a 16-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1475434) who died with an enlarged heart six days after receiving his first Pfizer dose.

Other reports include two 13-year-old boys (VAERS I.D. 1406840  and 1431289) who died two days after receiving a Pfizer vaccine, three 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918, 1382906 and 1242573), three 16-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1420630, 1225942 and 1386841) and three 17-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1199455, 1388042 and 1420762).

This week’s total U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to July 23, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:

Internal CDC document reveals vaccinated, even if not sick, can spread virus

 

The CDC now says even those people fully vaccinated for COVID are able to get, and spread, the virus.

According to internal documents obtained by The Washington Post, the CDC said it’s time to “Acknowledge the war has changed.”

The document outlined unpublished data showing fully vaccinated people might spread the Delta variant at the same rate as unvaccinated people, CNN reported.

It concludes the delta variant is “highly contagious, likely to be more severe” and that “breakthrough infections may be as transmissible as unvaccinated cases.”

The Washington Post reported:

“‘I think the central issue is that vaccinated people are probably involved to a substantial extent in the transmission of delta,’ Jeffrey Shaman, a Columbia University epidemiologist, wrote in an email after reviewing the CDC slides.

“‘In some sense, vaccination is now about personal protection — protecting oneself against severe disease. Herd immunity is not relevant as we are seeing plenty of evidence of repeat and breakthrough infections.’”

Since January, people who got infected after vaccination make up an increasing portion of hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths among COVID patients, according to the CDC documents. That trend coincides with the spread of the Delta variant.

The Post also reported today on a CDC study revealing three-fourths of people infected in a Massachusetts COVID outbreak were vaccinated. The report bolsters the hypothesis that vaccinated people can spread the more transmissible variant, and may be a factor in the summer surge of infections.

The data, detailed in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, provided key evidence that convinced agency scientists to reverse recommendations on mask-wearing and advise that vaccinated individuals wear masks in indoor public settings in some circumstances, The Post reported.

Thus far, researchers have focused on viral load — a term for how much of the virus is present in infected peoples’ bodies — which can affect transmissibility and severity. Infections with the Delta variant lead to higher levels of virus in the body, even in breakthrough cases in fully vaccinated individuals, the document said.

If vaccinated people get infected anyway, they have as much virus in their bodies as unvaccinated people — that means they’re as likely to infect someone else as unvaccinated people who get infected, CNN reported.

“The bottom line was that, in contrast to the other variants, vaccinated people, even if they didn’t get sick, got infected and shed virus at similar levels as unvaccinated people who got infected,” Dr. Walter Orenstein, who heads the Emory Vaccine Center and who viewed the documents, told CNN.

The CDC is scheduled to publish more data today.

Biden says federal workers must get vaccinated or submit to regular testing — postal union, others push back

President Biden on Thursday announced all civilian federal employees will be required to show proof of vaccination against COVID or be forced to submit to regular COVID testing, wear masks and socially distance.

Biden also called on state and local governments to use COVID relief funds to give $100 to residents who get vaccinated. In a statement released by the White House, the administration said the new rules were issued because of the Delta COVID variant, and because unvaccinated people present a problem to themselves, their families and co-workers.

“Every federal government employee will be asked to attest to their vaccination status.  Anyone who does not attest or is not vaccinated will be required to mask no matter where they work; test one or two times a week to see if they have a — they have acquired COVID, socially distance and generally will not be allowed to travel for work,” Biden said.

Biden directed his administration to apply similar standards to all federal contractors. “If you want to do business with the federal government, get your workers vaccinated,” he said.

In one early sign the policy may not go as smoothly as planned, the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) said it opposes the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate as a condition for employment, arguing it isn’t the role of the federal government to mandate vaccines or other testing measures.

“Maintaining the health and safety of our members is of paramount importance,” the APWU said in a statement issued Wednesday. “While the APWU leadership continues to encourage postal workers to voluntarily get vaccinated, it is not the role of the federal government to mandate vaccinations for the employees we represent.”

In advance of Biden’s official announcement, Children’s Health Defense on Thursday issued a statement disagreeing with the new policy.

The statement quoted CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr:

“Coerced medical interventions have been abhorrent to advocates of liberty and human dignity in every age. The fact that these vaccines are shoddily tested, experimental, unapproved and so risky their manufacturers can neither obtain insurance coverage nor indemnify users against grave injuries or death should magnify our ethical revulsion.”

FDA urges Moderna, Pfizer to include thousands more children in clinical trials

Pfizer and Moderna will expand their COVID vaccine clinical trial to include thousands more children prior to seeking EUA, after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told the vaccine makers the size and scope of their pediatric studies, as initially envisioned, were inadequate to detect rare side effects.

The rare side effects cited by the FDA included myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the lining around the heart, multiple people familiar with the trials told The New York Times.

Expanding the pediatric trials means thousands more children as young as 6 months old may soon be recruited and enrolled in COVID vaccine trials. According to the Times, the FDA asked the companies to include 3,000 children in the 5- to 11-year-old group, the group for whom results were expected first.

Moderna’s shot is authorized for emergency use in people 18 and up, and Pfizer’s vaccine is authorized for children as young as 12. No COVID vaccines have yet received EUA approval for children younger than 12.

America’s Frontline Doctors sue UC over vaccine mandates

With supporting declarations from top medical experts and students, America’s Frontline Doctors(AFLDS) filed a civil rights lawsuit in Federal Court against the University of California (UC), targeting the university system’s plan to mandate COVID vaccination for all students regardless of natural immunity.

As The Defender reported July 28, AFLDS, students and even the UC’s own top doctors, are criticizing the rushed mandate as arbitrary, unscientific and medically unnecessary.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in this civil rights case cite the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution’s protection of bodily integrity, as well as two California civil rights statutes (Cal. Civ. Code sec. 51, Cal. Gov. Code sec. 11135) that prohibit discrimination on the basis of medical or genetic status.

Accordingly, AFLDS is requesting an injunction to restrain the UC from utilizing coercion and segregation of naturally-immune and unvaccinated people in violation of Federal and State law.

The primary target of the lawsuit is the UC’s unscientific one-size-fits-all vaccine mandate where the UC rejects scientifically accepted prescreening for natural immunity.

The CDC, NIH pull in millions from licensing deals, including COVID-related technologies

Aggregated data for fiscal year 2020 show the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and CDC collected a combined $63.4 million in royalty revenues under a business model that allows the NIH to grant technology licenses to the private sector.

As The Defender reported earlier this week, with 27 different institutes and centers housed under the NIH umbrella — including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — NIH is the largest biomedical research agency in the world with an annual budget of nearly $42 billion.

Within NIH, the Office of Technology Transfer plays a “strategic role” in supporting patenting and licensing for inventions that emerge from laboratories at the NIH and CDC. In a win-win business model, the NIH routinely grants technology licenses to the private sector for use or commercialization of its inventions, with those licenses then driving billions of dollars in royalties back to the NIH.

In fiscal year 2020 alone — October 2019 through September 2020 — aggregated data for NIH and CDC show the agencies collected $63.4 million in royalty revenues.

Where public health agencies are concerned, COVID appears to be very good for business, with a flurry of unprecedented funding — conveniently mobilized by the pandemic — ushering in profound and likely permanent changes in a public health infrastructure once lamented as weak and fragmented.

As The Defender reported this week, Pfizer now projects $33 billion in COVID vaccine revenues, a sharp increase over earlier projections. The vaccine maker anticipates booster shots, a vaccine designed for the Delta variant and pending authorization of COVID vaccines for children will drive sales even higher next year.

144 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries

According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”

On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.

Despite multiple phone and email communications with several people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 144 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.

Featured image is from CHD

NOTE FROM Expanding Awareness Relations:

NECESSARY QUESTIONS TO REFLECT ON:

“If vaccinated people get infected anyway, they have as much virus in their bodies as unvaccinated people — that means they’re as likely to infect someone else as unvaccinated people who get infected”

– So why the incessant continual push to get people vaccinated who are willing to risk the virus symptoms? Instead of just dealing with potential symptoms of COVID, the vaccinated individuals are under the risk of NOT ONLY COVID, but ALSO the possibility of DANGEROUS SIDE EFFECTS from the vaccine. Why can’t individuals make the decision to only risk the COVID infection? Especially since there are BENEFICIAL TREATMENTS to help cure COVID (that is, unironically, being attacked on mainstream media/big tech platforms)? Not to mention that the CDC studies are showing that the vaccine MAY only reduce symptoms in the individual vaccinated – without any benefit to not spreading the virus?

And even if the report from the CDC turns out to be incorrect, do we still want to leave our health in the hands of corporations/organizations who have proven to be not only inept at every single guideline they have initiated during this “pandemic”, but also the numerous times they have flip-flopped, backtracked, retracted, reversed, changed their mind, etc. on their incorrect assessment of the situation, but who is also implementing growing endorsement for an experimental vaccine that has not yet been tested for genuine safety and efficacy? (And on that matter, according to the alarmingly increasing numbers of adverse events reported to VAERS, these vaccines are proving undoubtedly that they are NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.)

Science does not change. And with their (the government health agencies) ever-pervasive push on others to “trust the science”, yet show incredible incompetence as the “experts”, while at the same time denouncing thousands of doctors who HAVE BEEN CORRECT in their conclusions of this COVID/vaccine narrative, I’d say their roles in offering their “expertise” needs to be revoked and more attention needs to be focused on the TRUTHFUL doctors who are giving us more accurate statements than the NIH, CDC, NIAID, WHO, UN, etc.

Of course, in an honest world, this would happen. As it is, the world is seeing a corruption/collusion of unprecedented proportion, that is slowly but surely jolting multiple people awake, yet unfortunately not nearly enough. But the more of us that recognize this deception and who are spreading this awareness will eventually reach those who have remained in the dark, even if it may seem like a fruitless endeavor, and we can continue to make informed decisions while helping others break out of this manipulative system.

Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ

Robert O. Young’s Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice

I always hear from others, especially those who DON’T WANT TO HEAR DIFFERENTLY, if something sinister and nefarious were going on in the world, especially one that includes a worldwide effort to dictate the actions (and the populations) of everyone else, wouldn’t SOMEONE be talking about it?

So I’ve been making posts that reveal that more and more people HAVE talked about this, and to be honest, I’m having a hard time catching up. There are SO many people talking out against this agenda, and the reason why it’s not heard about?

Because “they” largely keep it out of the press. It is literally being suppressed. And no wonder, with these “powers that shouldn’t be” owning the media, owning big tech, owning big pharma, owning the government agencies, owning the health industries, owning the entertainment business, owning the education system… These “elites” have already infiltrated most aspects of our lives.

So. Of. Course. We’re. Not. Going. To. Hear. About. Corruption.

Unless we’re actively looking for it.

And don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to believe all of this is happening either. But once you open this door, even just a tiny little crack, the flood of information comes pouring through. And then it’s up to common sense, common decency, and common courage (all of which, sadly, aren’t so common anymore…) to keep the door open and expose it for the depravity it is.

The below testimony is from Dr. Robert O. Young, who reveals how he and other doctors of his position are treated when they go against the health/medical establishment, and the corruption of multiple agencies accused of perpetuating, quote/unquote, “new viruses” on the public all for the sake of fear-mongering, and driving people to turn to drugs and vaccines to “cure/treat” them. In reality, the true purpose is so much worse.

It is, in no other better terms, the BIGGEST SCAM on humanity.

Some excerpts with timestamps below [embellishment has been added for emphasis]. All quotes by Robert Young unless otherwise stated:

Sacha Stone: “Our next witness is Dr. Robert O. Young, who has graciously come to be here today from California in the United States.

Dr. Robert Young is widely recognized as one of the top researchers and clinical scientists in the world. He has developed his life to researching the true causes of diseases, subsequently developing something known as the new biology, to help people around the world reverse any sickness, any ailment, any disease. And to begin to rebalance their lives to reclaim their health and their wellness.

Mr. Young is a controversial character, in as much as he appears to be. One of the most targeted individuals on Earth, amongst the 7.5 odd billion souls that inhabit the surface of the Earth. Mr. Robert Young is probably one of the top dozen targeted individuals by the global corporatocracy, the global pharmaceutical enterprise, that element of the global pharmaceutical enterprise, which appears, I say advisedly, appears to have been weaponized against humanity. And it is the very reason why we are here today, and this week. Unapologetically.

Dr. Robert Young, you are very welcome to this tribunal. Thank you for coming.”

Silencing dissenting opinions… not just from censorship

Robert O. Young @3:50:There are powers to be that want to put impediments in the way, to slow you down. And if you don’t slow down, then they notch it up a few. And they gave me a warning in 1996, where I was charged with two counts. Those went away because there was no evidence that they could prosecute me on. And yet, not wikipedia, I call it wackipedia, uses that as a bullet, because I learned that what the opposite side is trying to achieve is headlines. And the headlines is what they use through the media to destroy you.

I didn’t really get the picture, even after being on major network shows. Constantly on Fox news, having been on Oprah Winfrey, having a good relationship with Dr. Oz, who told me I was on the top 10 list – he was number 7; I was number 8. As you know he had to testify in front of Congress about his actions as he deviates away from conventional medicine to more alternative medicine thought. You notice that his program trains changed dramatically.

So… yes. I was on that top 10 list, as Sacha referred to. I wasn’t sure what that all meant, but as I saw my friends and colleagues being taken out one by one, through assassination, I realized that potentially I had my life at risk and I also realized, which I’m very very sensitive, because I love my family, I love my children, I love my grandchildren, that if they can’t get you, then they take out those who they love. And in January, one of those people was taken out, and he was a colleague and a friend. He’s no longer with us.”

Dr. Young wouldn’t approve of hospital protocols

@14:05: “I asked Dr. Jonathan, should I return back to medical school, and he said, “You wouldn’t survive it.” And I said, “Why?” He said, “Because you would get to the emergency room and start doing things that were totally off the protocol. You would not survive it, nor would you approve of what’s going on.” It wasn’t a matter of education or being able to comprehend, it was a matter of… “there would be a very difficult thing for you to be in that environment.”

“Over time, acquired two bachelors, three masters, and three doctorates. One being in nutrition. One being in biochemistry, which I’m still trying to help people understand, which is called pathological blood coagulation. People still read it and scratch their head. But it’s something that I really cherish and I’m happy to provide the court with this dissertation, pathological blood coagulation, because it answers a very very important question: “Why does the blood coagulate inside the blood vessel?” No one’s ever been able to figure that out. Well it took me many many years to figure it out and to write schematics on how that process happens. And a lot of the work that I’ve been doing over the last 30 – or 35 years, is a result of this.”

Malfeasance/bribery/coercion in the medical industry

@21:57: [referring to a former client who was treated from metastatic breast cancer by Robert O. Young] “she subsequently left the ranch and she went home and eventually she, for some reason, decided to move from what she believed in and was passionate about, that literally saved her life, and become a witness for the district attorney.

And it was one of the ones which was shocking because never did I ask for anything in return. There was no financial consideration. In fact I was paying her to be there, she wasn’t paying me to be there on the ranch. So there was no – my attorney at that time, says this is a perfect example of no good deed goes unpunished.

And during the trial she did testify against me. And… you know, as I looked into her eyes, I noticed that something had seriously changed. I still, today, am shocked when I even talk about it. I later learned that the district attorney, not so much from her, but from others, are offered financial consideration for testifying against me. I have an affidavit in my possession that one of those who worked for me and worked for me for close to 17 years was offered close to a hundred thousand dollars to testify against me.”

@26:15: “This woman which is just shocking and what was not presented at the case, it was not allowed to come in, were the PET scans from the oncologist showing the remission of her cancer. She was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, three months after being on my program. Three months after, PET scans were taken, showing that there was no cancer anywhere in her body.”

 

@27:56:If however, someone like myself comes along with a new idea, that contradicts the credo that has been recited for years and passed on to others, and in fact, even threatened to overturn it, which my science does, then all passions are raised against this threat, and no method is left unturned to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible, pretending not to have heard of it. Speaking disparagingly of it. As if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted.”

No virus has ever been isolated

@30:31: “Once you understand the new biology, the new chemistry, the new physics, it literally underwrites everything you understand and even how wonderful and courageous Dale’s work is. Once he puts the other component, when he understands that the biggest fraud against this humanity, our humanity, is the fact that viruses have never been isolated! None!

There is no measle virus, and once you understand the basic chemistry and biology of the fraud that they’ve perpetuated on the human race and each year, if you ever thought about this, why is there a new virus every year? With a new name? With a similar types of symptomologies? This all started with the third reich, and Dr. Enders, and the so-called viruses. I write about this in one of my books. A Second Thoughts About Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV AIDS Hypothesis. And I’m not alone.

Those who have been brave enough, who stood up, even Peter Duesberg, at Berkeley University, a friend of mine, who wrote the book, Inventing AIDS Virus, lost all of his funding at the University. When the Nobel Prize winner for discovering the so-called HIV virus gets exiled to Beijing because he’s changing his mind about the existence of a virus. This is how bad things are.

What actually causes sickness?

@34:10: [while under house arrest] “But I didn’t stop working. I was not allowed to post to facebook. But I was still allowed to publish. And so I published a lot of the things that I’m talking about now even though it goes clear back to the 90’s. I began publishing in 2015 and 2016. And more recently, I shared this slide with the New Earth’s conference that 95% of all sickness and diseases are caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, and what you think. And I added additional thought in there. What you believe.

Your beliefs become biology. Only 5% of all sickness and disease is caused by genetics. And yet that 5% of genetics is only triggered based upon what you eat, what you drink, what you think, and what you believe. So you have to manage your thoughts. You have to manage your beliefs. Because they do change the biochemistry of the body.

Therefore, 100% of all sickness and disease is caused by what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, what you think and what you believe.”

@37:38: “The unfortunate thing, many doctors do not understand this simple principle: germs do not cause disease. Period. We have been sold a bill of goods. We have been deceived.”

“We are putting you out of business. We are shutting you down.”

@46:03: “The trustee, of Martin Luther King, said to me, “Dr. Young, you have to be very careful. You are the Martin Luther King of the 21st century. Your message is so powerful, it destroys complete industries.”

When I was in China, when I lectured at Jinhua University, after my lecture, I was pulled aside again, he said, “Dr. Young, your science is incredible. But I want to say this, you are not Western medicine, you’re not Eastern medicine, you’re something totally different. You need to be very careful.”

At that time, being proud and youthful in my thinking, not having experienced the strong hand of the government, not having been charged 3 times: 1996, 1999, and then 2013. Having… maybe a little bit of egotistical thinking, ‘how can they ever get me?’

You can make up a lot of stuff. And uh, that’s what happened on July 23rd 2013. They came in; when I asked them what was their purpose? They had investigators, said, “We are putting you out of business.” “We are shutting you down.”

Why would you need drugs if natural treatment/diet can cure you?

@54:51: “And I want to stop this madness. I want to stop the so-called “good-doers”, who think they’re doing right, are doing evil. You can see it, in their eyes. You can feel it, in their voice.

Their only gratification is, they got their headline off of me. They published it on “wackipedia”, who – and google, who promotes disinformation, of what the truth really is. No one’s going to publish my pleomorphic documents. Because that would cause a lot of upset in the medical community. Well. It would also cause a lot of upset in big pharma. Why would you need drugs?

Mass chemical poisoning – to wipe out the “deplorables”

@57:00: “I would like to provide two papers that are published, The Possible Cause of Polio, Post-polio, CNS, PVIPD, Legionnaires, AIDS and the Cancer Epidemic – and the reason I did a hyphen? Because I know these aren’t viruses. It’s mass chemical poisoning.

People in New Zealand, that are doing this, aren’t doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in India, are not doing it to kill the rats. The people that are doing this in New York, are not doing this to kill the rats. They are doing it to kill humanity; and wipe out the scourge of billions of people of those who they considered, you know, the “deplorables”. Quote, unquote, you know, Hillary Clinton.”

Dangerous substances in vaccines that we are injecting into children

@58:07: “So you asked the question of Dale, about vaccinations. This is what a child in the first years of life receives in micrograms and milligrams, etc.:

Screenshot taken from the video.

“This is what we are injecting into our newborn babies. As I said earlier, not in this format, the only thing you prove by vaccinating your children, is that if they live through it, is you just poisoned them and they survived it. There is no such thing as providing immunity or antibodies against these so-called assaults, when it’s not about the matter, it’s about the environment around the matter.”

“Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated”

@1:01:26: “Viral existence has NEVER been scientifically demonstrated, it’s never even been proven, all viruses from HIV, EBV, CMV, Hepatitis C, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Measles, Zika, polio, the list goes on and on.

[shows slide] This is how you centrifuge for determining or demonstrating the existence of virus. This is what they talk about that they do.

Now here’s the fraud. They don’t do it! And if they do it, they don’t find a virus!”

Renaming the same “virus/illness” to perpetuate “cures/vaccines”

@1:03:48: “So you see polio incidence and pesticide production, as it rises up, and as it drops down – so we’re going to be seeing more incidence of paralysis – what they do, “We can’t have polio, we already cured that. So we’re going to put another name on it.”

That’s what they do in the cancer business. That’s what they’ve done in HIV. HIV would just quietly go away and there’ll be a new name for AIDS, auto-acquired immune deficiency.”

@1:04:21: “Poliomyelitis Incidence Timeline: from 1912 to 1970, why is Polio on the rise? Because DDT somewhere in the world is being used and they’re importing that food into the U.S. market. And if it’s not DDT, it’s Roundup. Glycophosphates. And they were so convinced that it was helpful, they actually sprayed it on everyone. Even children during school; they were sprayed.

So here we see the polio incidence and DDT production from 1940 to 70, in millions of pounds, and what happened as that came off? Has nothing to do with the efficacy of vaccines.

I want you to understand my position on this. See, once you understand that there’s no virus, what’s the point? What are you inoculating for? So what they did, they said, “Well wait a minute. Polio can’t come back. We have a cure. So let’s call it a… something else. Acute flaccid paralysis. Because we can’t have polio.”

Tragic deaths of multiple holistic/naturopathic doctors

Sacha Stone: @1:24:39: “Underpinning the imperative of this commission of inquiry, is the recent apparent murders, assassinations, of multiple natural practitioners and advocates of natural cures.”

“You also reminded us, incredibly succinctly, that we have made very little, if any, progress since the medieval times, as it relates to how the greatest souls amongst us – healing, treating, curing, redeeming, saving humanity from itself are witch hunted, as heretics, burned at the stake.”

Depopulation agenda by biological/chemical warfare

Sacha Stone: @1:32:14: “Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?”

Robert Young: “They don’t. I mean, none.”

Sacha Stone: “And, am I right in suggesting that a medicine, by definition, is something which contains synthetic molecules. Something that is registered, patented, put in the market as a medicine?”

Robert Young: “Absolutely.”

Sacha Stone: “So, what I’m learning from you, Dr. Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us, decimating, culling, the human family…”

Robert Young: “Intentionally.”

Sacha Stone: “Intentionally. Using synthetic molecules, which by design are our cancer aids – “

Robert Young: “Yes, for the purpose of sterilization and population control. There’s too many people on the planet, we need to get rid of, in the words of Bill Gates, at least 3 billion people, need to die. So we’ll just start off in Africa, we’ll start doing our research there, and we’ll eliminate most of the Africans, because they’re deplorable. They’re worthless. They’re not part of this “world economy”. So they have their rights taken away, and they’re suppressed and they’re experimented.”

Sacha Stone: “And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory, so-called, authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized. And appear, I again use the word ‘appear’ advisedly, we’re not casting judgements here, we’re taking depositions listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized, and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?”

Robert Young: “It is. It’s not a bacterial war, it’s a systemic poisoning war. And they’re using chemical warfare against all of us.”

Sacha Stone: “Have you in your years defined anything close to the atoms seed of who and what they are? We know about the agencies, we understand the acronyms, but have you come close at all to identifying who and what they are?”

Robert Young: “I haven’t met these Luciferian people. Wherever they may be. They hide because they fear the light, of which I represent.”

Culling of at least a third of the population – using VACCINES – starting with Africa

Sir John Walsh of Brannagh ITNJ Chief Justice: “This is not a question. You said that you’d heard that there was basically a plan to eliminate a third of the population. A colleague – population of the world, and that Africa was the main target because the people there are worthless… I just want to say, that a colleague of mine, and I make it clear when I say ‘colleague’ – someone I know professionally who is very highly placed – he’s not a friend, he’s just someone I know who went to the conference at Davos just recently, and the people who go to Davos are the architects and controllers of money and the politics of the world, and he came back and he said to me, that it is a definite systematic plan, because they have worked out they need to get rid of at least a third of the people on the Earth. And I said to him, “Does that include me?” And he said, “No, it doesn’t include you, because you’re of European stock.”

Robert Young: “Yeah, well, these are not my words. These are Bill Gates’ words. Just google Bill Gates and depopulation and sterilization, and you’ll hear out of his own mouth the plan. And then if that’s not enough for you, then listen to Henry Kissinger, and his words, where he talks about how this is a win-win situation and the mandation and mandating vaccines is part of the plan for depopulation

“Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

Bishop Riah Abu el Assal ITNJ Commissioner @1:37:17: “I have much in common with you. I’ve been blacklisted for almost a quarter of a century. They try to plant weapons in our home. I was accused that I subsidized terroristic and subversive activity – different activities in Israel and the West Bank. And then I ended up invited by the different parties witnessing the Nobel Peace Prize given to Chairman Arafat, Prime Minister Lavigne, and later President Pence. I was there in Mosul. Never lose hope. You’re gonna win.”

For further reading of Dr. Robert O. Young and his views, please visit:
Dr. Robert O. Young | Your Ultimate Guide for Healthy Living

So many people are speaking out against this agenda. Good, honest people risking their livelihood, their reputation, their safety… for our sake.

Are we going to continue to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to them? Or finally open ourselves up to accepting the truth and commending these brave people for standing up against these corrupt institutions and take action? Stop consenting, bring these injustices to light, and hold the groups responsible accountable for these egregious crimes.

This takes an effort on everyone’s part. The media. The politicians. The health industry. The education system. The entertainment business. Big tech. Law enforcement. The government… There ARE honest people within all of these establishments. As corrupt as some of these institutions are. Perhaps people are unwittingly going along with the plan because they see no other choice.  YOU ARE THE CHOICE! When more and more people stand up and refuse this system, it crumbles and fails. Be a part of the fight FOR humanity. Not against it.