The ‘Human’ Hundredth Monkey Effect Explained | Critical Mass, The Shift And What It Could Look Like

Sharing truth and compassion may catapult us into a new era of human-conscious development.

Because I think it’s incredibly important to assess and reassess who we are and what we are capable of, I’d like to bring attention to this post that was created over 6 years ago. In it, it details an incredible study (that wasn’t even the focal point of the study…) that occurred in the 1950’s.

Granted, the study happened in monkeys, but it is still an amazing insight into what’s possible using a sort of collective mind, a consciousness that lifeforms may be able to tap into in order to grow and develop for widespread benefit and harmonious synergy.

What would be better for humankind? To remain in a state of chaos and panic, division and hostility? Or to finally realize that we are all connected and we learn to love and understand one another instead?

If it’s true that there is a common kindredship between all of us, and I do believe there is, then eventually a conscious awakening is the inevitable step forward for our evolution.

While the below example simply involves washing potatoes to introduce a better way of living (and even then, this harmless act was still resisted by some in their communities…), the pursuit by many people to find the truth, the meaning of life, a more joyful and compassionate experience in the world – will spread and affect others to want to pursue the same enlightenment.

And while again, there may be some who will resist, that will be their choice – and they will have chosen to remain in the same bleak creation that they refuse to leave; while others will have moved on to create a new, more benevolent, honorable world while simultaneously phasing out the “old way”.

by Justin Deschamps

 

The 100th Monkey Effect is probably one of the most cited phenomenons in the awakening community, yet it is also greatly misunderstood.

Many contend that this effect is proof positive of an instantaneous and automatic ascension or awakening of all people will take place in the near future. A type of ‘tsunami’ of awakening will sweep the planet, forcing everyone to be more loving, honest and fair. But is this really true?

Related Science Suggests Love and Receptiveness to Truth Enhance Psi Abilities — Telepathy Can be Explained by Interacting Coherent Electromagnetic Fields

The 100th Monkey Effect

As the below article details, the 100th monkey effect is an accidental discovery by a team of researchers in the mid 1960’s. The team was studying the Japanese Macaca monkey that was provided sweet potatoes from the team that they enjoyed eating.

Here is an excerpt from the accounting below:

“In 1952, on the island of Koshima, scientists were providing monkeys with sweet potatoes dropped in the sand. The monkeys liked the taste of the raw sweet potatoes, but they found the dirt unpleasant.

“An 18-month-old female named Imo found she could solve the problem by washing the potatoes in a nearby stream. She taught this trick to her mother. Her playmates also learned this new way and they taught their mothers too.

“This cultural innovation was gradually picked up by various monkeys before the eyes of the scientists.

“Between 1952 and 1958 all the young monkeys learned to wash the sandy sweet potatoes to make them more palatable.

Only the adults who imitated their children learned this social improvement. Other adults kept eating the dirty sweet potatoes.

“Then something startling took place. In the autumn of 1958, a certain number of Koshima monkeys were washing sweet potatoes — the exact number is not known.

“Let us suppose that when the sun rose one morning there were 99 monkeys on Koshima Island who had learned to wash their sweet potatoes.

“Let’s further suppose that later that morning, the hundredth monkey learned to wash potatoes.

“Then it happened!

“By that evening almost everyone in the tribe was washing sweet potatoes before eating them.

“The added energy of this hundredth monkey somehow created an ideological breakthrough!

“But notice.

“A most surprising thing observed by these scientists was that the habit of washing sweet potatoes then jumped over the sea 

“Colonies of monkeys on other islands and the mainland troop of monkeys at Takasakiyama began washing their sweet potatoes.

And here is the most revealing passage:

“The new behavior pattern spread to most, but not all, of the monkeys. Older monkeys, in particular, remained steadfast in their established behavior patterns and resisted change. When the new behavior pattern suddenly appeared among monkey troupes on other islands, only a few monkeys on those islands picked up on the new idea. The ones most receptive to new ideas started imitating the new behavior and demonstrating it to the impressionable younger ones. Thus, they too began their own path towards their eventual hundredth monkey effect.”

First the effect was not a complete and total paradigm shift within the monkey population. At best, all that occurred was a transition of awareness; the newer monkeys learned about the washing method, but did not automatically begin washing the potatoes.

Second, the transmission occurred after a sufficient number of monkeys in the host population expressed the washing behavior. It was then that “only a few monkeys on those [new] islands” began washing the potatoes. In other words, it wasn’t enough to simply be aware of this new way, it had to be accepted and expressed in order to ‘build up’ in the host population, which eventually experienced a pandemic awareness of the better way.

Finally, the newly affected monkeys on the surrounding islands “began their own path towards their eventual hundredth monkey effect,” in other words, that the affected population had a time delay between transmission and the majority of monkeys displaying the washing behavior.

All of these points suggest an entrainment or synchronization process, which is a property of waveforms or systems of frequency. The mind and consciousness have long been associated to frequency and rhythmic patterns, and this transmission effect perfectly matches what can be observed in other phenomenon, such as synchronizing metronomes.

Related Entrainment, Communication, Information and Evolution

When two systems of motion come in contact with each other, such that information from one can be transmitted to the other, a slow and steady process of entrainment takes place. Eventually the two different systems synchronize to the point that the motion of one is reflective of the other. One of the better examples of this universal information transmission via frequency and resonance is metronomes.

Synchronizing Metronomes

 

Synchronization occurs in a four-step process and is symbolic of how the same process occurs within the mind.

  • Step 1: Initially, the metronomes are ticking at unique rhythms, unable to be transmitted to the others because no medium or channel is available to provide for the mechanical energy to flow. The swinging of each metronome arm moves from side to side, and is it does so, kinetic energy in the arm pushes against the base of the metronome. But because the devices are on an immoveable surface, this energy cannot be sent to their neighbors and it is absorbed by the table; no transmission can take place.
  • Step 2: The metronomes are placed on a board and moved on top of two cans. Now the motion of the arms has a pathway to travel to the other metronomes, which pushes against the base through the board and on to the other devices. The moment that they are placed together a new system is created with an ideal resonant frequency. This frequency will push against out of step motion and push with instep motion, which slowly alters the behavior of each individual device to match the larger board and metronome system; transmission is beginning to occur.
  • Step 3: The resonant frequency of the board metronome system is initially at a low intensity or ‘volume’, but as each metronome’s behavior is adjusted, they begin to tick in harmony. Eventually the intensity of the resonant frequency overtakes the frequencies of the individual metronomes. At this point the near instant synchronization begins to takes place; transmission is rapidly accelerating.
  • Step 4: The resonant frequency of the board metronome system is now dominant, exponentially working against out of step movements of the individual devices. The inertia of the initial frequencies of each metronome becomes less and less strong, until the whole system dramatically shifts into a synchronized state over a few seconds of time; transmission is fully complete.

Analysis and Integration with the 100th Monkey Effect

In the above example, metronomes were only able to synchronize under certain conditions. A metronome placed on a table that is too rigid, won’t allow for the unique frequency to be transmitted and harmonized with the group. This aspect represents free will, that a metronome can only be changed if it is open to the others. Finally the process took time, it wasn’t until the resonant frequency of the metronome board system reached a strong enough intensity that the ‘quantum leap’ process started.

Similarly, the same type of shift occurred in the Monkeys. For example, the subjects that were the most receptive to the washing behavior were the young monkeys, those able to recognize the advantage of doing so, and that were open minded enough to try the new way. The older monkeys that were more stubborn never learned to wash the potatoes at all. The key principle here is free will, the monkeys were not forced to change but instead had a choice. Finally the process took time, marked by definitive and recognizable hallmarks of progress. Once enough monkey’s made the choice to wash the potatoes, an ‘overnight’ shift took place, and almost all of the monkeys took up the new behavior.

Human ‘100th Monkey Effect’

How does this translate to human consciousness and the infamous paradigm shift spoken of in various circles?

Firstly, the key reason why the metronomes synchronized was because the resonant frequency was ‘better’ then the individual ones. Similarly, the washing behavior was ‘better’ then not washing them. This means that there was a real and bonafide objective improvement that was overriding the older behavior. For the human consciousness shift this translates as truth and practicality, that finding the truth and sharing it with others isn’t just a nice thing to do but it literally improves the quality of life of individuals and groups objectively. This is an essential aspect to consider because the shift in consciousness is objective and practical while also being ideal and subjective. It is a personal choice as well as a scientific process of discovering and finding the better way.

As each individual on the planet discovers the truth and understands it personally, they alter their behavior accordingly so as to embody the wisdom gained. For example, cutting wood with a small axe is less effective than using a large one, and in most cases a person would rather be more efficient then not. Therefore the shift in consciousness is not just a more positive way, it is literally a better way, the marriage of idealism and pragmatism.

Second, this better way can not be forced on to others, free will and the ability to choose is still in effect. This means that as the consciousness shift progresses forward, on average people will most likely embody these more accurate truths and change accordingly; but not everyone.

That being said, the nature of our social fabric is such that many people find value in what the collective is doing. In this sense, when a majority of humanity embodies this newer way it will naturally become more appealing to the minority; but free will choice of each individual is still the determining factor. Additionally, each person is on his or her own unique path towards discovering this better way, and while from our point of view it may seem as if others aren’t evolving fast enough they are still making progress. Even people who reject all forms of truth and hold on to the past are part of the shift taking place, their stubbornness in and of itself is an indication that the newer way is gaining strength and as such it requires more energy to deny. Compassion in these instances is far more helpful then peer pressure.

Finally, not everyone will shift. This is an idea that makes most people uncomfortable, as if some are being left behind. But in truth, since the whole process is founded on free will choice, is this not more honorable? If an individual denies the objective truth of the better ways, then that is their choice and the universe will not force it on to them, but they will continue to labor under the errors of their own making. This is just like the older monkeys chose not to wash the potatoes and suffered the displeasure of eating dirt as a result.

It is these contrasting experiences that help us open our minds to newer ways of being. As such we need not become frustrated at the close-mindedness of others because this is actually an indication they have received the transmission, but simply chose to reject it; a choice we would do well to honor so long as it does not harm others.

Conclusion

At this stage not enough data is available to make any kind of prediction as to how many people will shift. But since the shift is ultimately a personal choice based on knowledge and awareness, we can assist others in their path by sharing what we have come to understand as individuals. This means that the simple act of kindly sharing our truths is the single most important factor to the human 100th monkey effect.

Related Paths to Awakening: Spiritual Activism or Disempowerment | Understanding the Spiritual Causes of Depression

It may be difficult to see the shift occurring, but it undoubtedly is and we need only stay the course of seeking the truth, understanding it and sharing it with others to ensure things progress forward. They may not want to hear it at first, they might fight us and call us crazy, but all these things and more are indications the transmission has been received; we need only honor their choice while taking measures to ensure it does not harm another in the process.

It is my hope that these deep principles of free will and information transmission are understood so as to provide the surety in knowing our work is having an impact.

– Justin

The preceding article is a Stillness in the Storm original creation. Please share widely.

*Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Which One Are You?: A Follower? Or a Leader? | The Answer May Shock You

No pun intended.

During these uncertain times, especially amidst the corona/vaccine agendas, it has become increasingly clear that there are, sadly, a great percentage of conformed followers than there are questioning leaders.

I’d like to highlight the following social experiments to demonstrate this. Now unless these experiments were staged, because I can’t rule that out, but I am going under the assumption that it has not, and that these are legitimate.

Similar experiments like these have been conducted in the past as well, with varying results. However, just from these modern time experiments, it is worrying the lengths that conformity will go to in order to just be one of the pack, and not be considered an “outlier”. We can see it in abundance today, that humanity hasn’t changed much in their line of thinking. If anything, we have become even more docile, even more compliant, even more unquestioning of even the most inane decisions as long as it comes from a position of “authority”.

The below experiments show the need that people have to follow the group, even if it doesn’t make sense, and/or even if it’s wrong. While the first couple of experiments shown do not involve the welfare of others, the third example most certainly does, and the results are terrifying.

Do you know where you’d stand? Are you being completely honest with yourself? Take a deep, long look at what’s going on in the world; how desperate some people are to fit in, to not be considered a “conspiracy theorist”, or a “right-wing nut” that doesn’t agree with the “majority of the population”… or a dumb imbecile that doesn’t even listen to experts/authority…

Would you be okay going against the grain even though EVERYONE ELSE around you is following a certain narrative?

EXPERIMENT 1. Social Conformity

This first experiment shows a lady who, though there is no reason for doing so, other than everybody else was doing it, conforms to a practice of standing up when a buzzer goes off, then sitting back down after a second or two. There is LITERALLY no reason to do this, but slowly but surely, even those who were not hired actors who initiated this social conditioning from the start, became conformed to following the original test subject.

What would you have done?

It’s easy to say that we wouldn’t participate without being in the same situation as them, but would we, or wouldn’t we? Can we admit when we may just well follow along with the pack for the sake of not being ostracized or be the odd one out? Or would we be strong enough in our own resolution to not follow along with silly mandates, even though everyone else around is?

Experiment 2. Herd Mentality

The below video shows a modern day example of the Asch experiment in progress. The Asch experiment wanted to see how many people would be influenced in giving the wrong answer, simply because everyone else gave the wrong answer. In this line up, 10 people are given the task of choosing which line matches the singular line shown on a separate stand. The first 9 people are all in on the scam to choose the wrong answer, leaving the 10th person, the actual test subject, to decide their answer. Will they trust their instinct and choose the right answer, even if they’re the ONLY ONE to choose it?

Or will they follow along with the crowd?

Herd mentality and peer pressure are very real social dilemmas that affect people in our day to day lives. While some people did not conform to the rest of the group, indicating that there are some willing to follow their intuition and not follow the crowd, even at the risk of ostracization or looking silly, we also can’t overlook the fact that some people may already know about the Asch experiment, and realize that it is a social test; thus skewering the results.

As it is, being different and the only one to choose a different answer, can seem isolating; but if one has confidence in themselves, and doesn’t care what other people think, especially when they’re sure the other people are wrong, can we see real leadership – and perhaps make us second guess our initial reaction/response.

Now, while the first two examples had nothing to do with anything serious, what if the matter literally comes to life and death? What if we are coerced, say… by an authority figure, to carrying out an act that does significant harm to another human being?

Think people will be any less obedient/conforming?

Take a look at the Milgram experiment, which was conducted in the 1960’s to test people’s obedience to authority figures.

Experiment 3. “Listen to the Authorities”

This video is highly disturbing, because it shows the lengths that people will go to simply in the name of listening to an authority figure; even if they’re against it, even if they want nothing more to do with a particular action, if they are commanded by someone in a presumed position of authority, they will continue to commit life-threatening harm on another being.

Source: youtube | Brian Burak | Milgrim Experiment [Milgram]

The gentleman who has the unfortunate task of “punishing” the learner is clearly distraught over the commands to keep inflicting shocks to the other participant. However, at the continued prompting of the experimenter, ends up going all the way to the end of the shock board – even after the learner ceases to respond.

It’s important to note that he is not FORCED to keep pressing the switch. He could refuse – in fact, does so on numerous occasions, yet at the insisting prods of the experimenter, concedes, albeit begrudgingly, and continues to press the switches.

It’s clear that he cares about the other person at the end of the shocks, yet because this authority figure tells him to continue – to inflict terrible pain even to the point of no response – he finishes the task until the experimenter tells him to stop.

The following short interview between the gentleman and the experimenter(s) happens next:

Experimenter: “How do you feel, by the way?”

Subject: “I feel all right, but I don’t like what’s happened to that fellow in there. He’s been hollering – we had to keep giving him shocks – I didn’t like that one bit. I mean, he wanted to get out, and you just kept going, kept throwing 450 volts. I didn’t like that. He wouldn’t even look in on that gentleman.”

Experimenter 2: “But who’s actually pushing the switch?”

Subject: “I was. But he kept insisting. I told him no, but he said it got to keep going. I told him it’s time we stopped when we got up to 195, 210 volts.”

Experimenter 2: “But why didn’t you just stop?”

Subject: “He wouldn’t let me! I wanted to stop.”

Think the test would have been any different if a cute, little puppy was involved? …Well, you’d be wrong.

In an incredibly inhumane experiment, the same experiment was conducted, but this time using a puppy, with real shocks. I obviously DO NOT CONDONE the following test, but wanted to mention it here for further reference to people’s compliance to authority figures:

(And I usually don’t condone cussing on this site, but in some cases it’s warranted and drives the point home rather succinctly)

Charles Sheridan and Richard King took this experiment one step further, but asked subjects to shock a puppy for every incorrect action it made. Unlike Milgram’s experiment, this shock was real. Exactly 20 out of 26 subjects went to the highest voltage.

Almost 80 percent. Think about that when you’re walking around the mall: Eight out of ten of those people you see would torture the shit out of a puppy if a dude in a lab coat asked them to.

Words at the end of the above video from Stanley Milgram that should be immortalized:

“The results, as I observe them in the laboratory, are disturbing. They raised the possibility that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority.

A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do irrespective of the content of the act and without limitations of conscience. So long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.

If in this study, an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a 50 year old man and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests, one can only wonder what government, with its vastly greater authority and prestige, can command of its subjects.

I believe we are all under a social experiment of some kind, by design. The corrupt world leaders are sitting back, watching people follow in line of the most ridiculous and dangerous mandates; laughing at how many actually follow and enforce these rules, while at the same time seeing just how far they can go before people start realizing that it is all a farce.

Then when you consider exactly how much of an influence that social media presents on our life, and the excessive amount of bots programmed to give the users the illusion that a vast amount of the population thinks a certain way, including collusions with the mainstream media – one can see how easily the public could be swayed into a “groupthink” mentality.

So how far can humanity be pushed to following a narrative, a guideline, a rule, if seemingly “everybody” else does it too, and especially when those in a “position of authority” command it?

This is the question that is being asked. And chillingly, a large portion of people would rather follow the herd mentality, than be a brave individual that goes against the status quo. Even if one’s own moral conscience is on the line.

I think it’s high time for all of us, as an individual, to really take a step back and gauge our own actions (and inactions, for that matter). Can we develop our own fortitude, our own strong constitution, to do what’s right – even if “the majority” or “authority figures” demand we do otherwise? What is “right”, for that matter? 

Our moral compass is being tampered with. We need to fine-tune it, and get back on track. Regardless of peer pressure or authoritative control. And we need to be brave enough to stand apart from the herd, and help lead the pack away from this destructive nature.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Crystal Clear Learning

“You Will Hear of Wars and Rumors of Wars” – But What Happens AFTER? | The Destined Conclusion - While our world seems to be heading into a pit of despair and chaos - there is redemption.
An Essential Question We All Must Ask Ourselves: How Far Will We Go to Save Our Own Life? - How much is our life worth? Or our child? Where is the limit?
The ‘Human’ Hundredth Monkey Effect Explained | Critical Mass, The Shift And What It Could Look Like - Sharing truth and compassion may catapult us into a new era of human-conscious development.
Is The World Ready for a Divine Revelation? | A “Warning” to Wake Us Up? - "In that moment, we're going to see our conscience. You're going to see everything wrong that you're doing and the good you're not doing."
Demoralization: What Happens When We Feel Like Giving Up - Sometimes the world seems so dark - it almost feels hopeless...
You Are Much More Than You Realize | But You Need to Believe It - What do you believe in? Do you REALLY believe it?
The Other Virus: Learned Helplessness - Compliance leading to our downfall.