Is the Dome/Firmament Over Earth Real?

Is there a barrier between us, and “space” as we know it?

After addressing the insane amount of lies that NASA has built their enterprise upon (Exposing NASA’s Many Lies) I felt it necessary to also address the subject of the dome / firmament that many people claim is surrounding the Earth.

Of course, these claims are heatedly disputed, though not as much as the “flat Earth” theory – although some people tie both of these topics into the same category.

Obviously, if there is a dome around Earth, then it would automatically counter most of the findings from NASA. We wouldn’t have been able to go to the moon (unless, of course, the moon is within Earth’s firmament somehow) and all of their fantastic satellite voyages to Mars are nothing more than a Hollywood production.

There are uncanny correlations between the Mars terrain that their multi-BILLION dollar space rover allegedly photographed – to those of the terrain on Earth (Devon Island, off the coast of Canada, to be exact – where NASA has admitted to having a base there to “practice” on the rocky terrain – similar to that of how they used Mauna Kea, Hawaii, which eerily resembles the Apollo space landings) – while also strangely accidentally photographing on Mars what seems to be wildlife (lizard, squirrel, rabbit…) and items normally found on Earth – (coffin, war helmet, etc.)

How are they able to find so many creatures and items from Earth on Mars?

BECAUSE THEY’VE NEVER BEEN TO MARS!!!!

Everything is filmed on EARTH.

More reading on the Mars Rover Fake Landing: NASA Mars Hoax: “Rover Is on Devon Island, Canada? You Decide

Why is this such an important point in the dome / firmament theory?

Because if we’ve never even left the Earth’s atmosphere, or our own “orbit”, the questions then become why, and why would we have been lied to about it all these years?

A theory I propose is that all these billions of dollars that are given to NASA, is not only to keep the “space exploration” alive for the public’s belief in their industry – (and disbelief in the Bible) but it may also be used to try and break this dome.

By faking the space exploration around Earth, it gives people more belief in science and perhaps the ever-expanding universe – while also making Earth seem inconsequential and insignificant in light of our humanity/consciousness, and also contradicts the Bible.

People may scoff and laugh, but I think this is a HUGE part of the deception that NASA and their cohorts are trying to pull over the population.

I’m going to take you back to Genesis. Back to the flood that covered the whole Earth.
Tear in the sky.
Image by Adam Derewecki from Pixabay
The Bible itself references a firmament. Several times, as a matter of fact. Here are a few examples:
(Visit “FIRMAMENT” in the KJV Bible for more examples.)
6 Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”
7 Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. So the evening and the morning were the second day.
Genesis 1:6-9
14 Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;
15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so.
16 Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also.
17 God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth,
Genesis 1:14-17
22 The likeness of the firmament above the heads of the living creatures was like the color of an awesome crystal, stretched out over their heads.
Ezekial 1:22

How far exactly is the sun from Earth? 93 million miles, according to NASA?

Source: youtube | Jesus Truth | Is the Sun really 93 Million Miles away???

Are these clips just really clever cgi edited videos? Could it simply be a trick of the light/reflection/refraction of some kind? A government experiment with holograms? What are we really seeing here?

Notice that in Genesis 1:17, it states that God put the lights (sun, moon, stars) IN the firmament.

Not above. Not below. IN. If this is true, how could we see the sun, moon and the stars unless the firmament was clear – like a crystal, perhaps?

But what does firmament mean? Let’s take a look:

firmament:

n. The vault or expanse of the heavens; the sky.
n. Foundation; support; basis.
n. The sky or heavens; the vault of heaven, viewed as something solid and abiding; the region of the air.

(Here are some more examples, implying that some of these definitions are obsolete… I wonder why…)

noun obsolete: Fixed foundation; established basis.
noun (Old Astron.): The orb of the fixed stars; the most remote of the celestial spheres.
noun: The field or sphere of an interest or activity.
noun archaic: In the geocentric Ptolemaic system, the eighth sphere, which carried the fixed stars.
noun: the apparent surface of the imaginary sphere on which celestial bodies appear to be projected

wordnik.com/words/firmament

It’s really funny how throughout several centuries, “firmament” had always meant some form of the above definitions, yet now they are trying to say that firmament was a mistranslation – and the word in the original texts actually means “expanse”. Of course, only those with a scholarly (and honest) education in etymology and Hebrew would be able to discern better. And we should be aware that the act of changing definitions by tptsb is not new, as they will try it at their whim in order to fit their agenda. (case in point: WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Its Website)

Then there are other different translations between all of the Bibles themselves. Some of the different terminology that has been used instead of “firmament” and “expanse” are “sky”, “dome”, “vapor”, “horizon”, “heavens”, “canopy”, “vault” (just wait until you see what vault means…), etc. You can see why there would be so much debate and discussion on this topic.

Now getting back to the flood, some people have proposed that the image above of the “Milky Way Galaxy” is actually a tear in the firmament that God allowed to release the waters to flood the Earth. Here’s a couple of interesting verses that lends credence to this theory:

11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:11
6 He who builds His layers in the sky, And has founded His strata in the earth; Who calls for the waters of the sea, And pours them out on the face of the earth— The Lord is His name.
Amos 9:6
10 And immediately, coming up from the water, He saw the heavens parting and the Spirit descending upon Him like a dove.
Mark 1:10

Here is an interesting video of what looks like a tear in the sky. Is this someone pulling a prank on the viewers? Is it some kind of weird natural phenomena not normally seen? Is it a spiritual phenomena? Is it an encounter with aliens?

Source: youtube | DJ Eric Monroy | Unexplained tear in the sky

A user left a comment detailing what he purportedly saw:

But perhaps that’s not enough to tie all these theories together.

No worries. I’ve got more.

Government Research / Testing

It’s no secret that the government(s) have been engaged in studies, research, even experiments with this planet and the living beings on it. One that I’d like to focus on involves the government’s interest in Antarctica, and outer space. Why do the two go hand in hand?

Well, let’s take a look at the timeline below.

(1946 – 1947)Feb 19, 1947 – Operation Highjump was formed to investigate Antarctica. It is my belief that Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. was not given the full scope of the mission – as the government had kept the true reason a secret. This link: Operation High Jump: “The Untold UFO War in Antarctica” and the “Hollow Earth Theory” – ADMIRAL RICHARD E. BYRD, reports a diary entry allegedly by Richard Byrd speaking of the mission and the fascinating encounter he met there.

(1958) – On July 29, 1958, Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, establishing NASA – historically as a response to the space war against Russia.

(1958 – 1962) – Transfer of JPL (“Jet Propulsion Laboratory” founded by Jack Parsons, who was heavily involved in the occult and Crowley’s “Do what thou wilt” religion – The Occult Roots of NASA and the Ongoing Fraud) to the newly created NASA organization. (Funny how NASA was basically built upon a man of “science” who was obsessed with the occult. But “trust the science”, right?)

(1959) – Antarctic Treaty, (Dec. 1, 1959), agreement signed by 12 nations, in which the Antarctic continent was made a demilitarized zone to be preserved for scientific research. – britannica.com

(1962) – Operation Fishbowl was a series of high altitude nuclear tests in 1962 that were carried out by the United States as a part of the larger Operation Dominic nuclear test program. The Operation Fishbowl nuclear tests were originally planned to be completed during the first half of 1962 with three tests named Bluegill, Starfishand Urraca.

(1969)July 20, 1969, The first Apollo moon landing allegedly happened. (and more staged footages/pictures from NASA ever since…)

(1997) – Fake photos from NASA continue – this time from the Mars rover landing (still ongoing).

(1998) – On May 12, 2017, a mystery facebook user made a detailed post with his own anecdotal experience on Mcmurdo station (United States Antarctic Research station) and a researcher showing him what they call “sky ice”.

For some other interesting pictures/references to the spoken account of the facebook user’s experience:

To read the experience personally, this video shows clips of the facebook post itself:

(2018) – A team of scientists/researchers bore a drill on the Ross Ice Shelf and made these discoveries: “As was recently highlighted by a piece over on National Geographic, the underside of the Ross Ice Shelf isn’t currently melting.

 

The presence of a basal layer of flat ice crystals suggests that the seawater there – at least, in the spots they drilled – is actually freezing into place instead.”Researchers Drilling Into Antarctica’s Ross Ice Shelf Make A Genuinely Surprising Discovery

For a more thorough history of Antarctica, please visit: An Antarctic Time Line : 1519 – 1959

This is just the tip of the iceberg. (Ha! See what I did there?)

Now a lot of people have speculated that the nuclear testing that the government has been carrying out was in fact to see how far the firmament reaches, and if their own nuclear power could break the dome. The creation of NASA, in my theory, was to keep up the illusion of space, while the world leaders investigated what, exactly, is space – and how to get there. Is NASA the modern day “Tower of Babel”?

Then there’s another theory that I came across, more of an insight really, that perhaps since the space team couldn’t break out of the dome/force field, or what have you, that the Antarctica research (drilling down into the snow/ice) could be an attempt to see how far deep the dome/firmament goes into the ground, and if it’s possible to dig underneath it. Even if the scientists/researchers may not be aware that this could be a possible motive by tptsb.

And the strange findings in Antarctica raises questions about what Admiral Byrd allegedly encountered, and why we – the general public – has heard very little about this.

Why keep it a secret? The message that Admiral Byrd received was a significantly benign one. Are these all just psychological tricks and the military didn’t trust the information that Mr. Byrd received? Did the people that he encountered truly have a peaceful countenance and wished nothing but goodwill for this planet? …With that being said, weren’t THEY on the planet, as well? If so, where exactly is the location and why are they so much more technologically advanced than we are?

Could Mr. Byrd himself have been participating in a psyop of some sort to mislead the public?

Too many questions arise when looking at all this research. And as theories abound, the purpose of Antarctica (and the firmament/dome) seems to serve as an ice wall to keep us contained. (Like a “fishbowl”, perhaps?)

2 The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
Genesis 1:2

As a whole, it seems as if humanity has lost sight of what really matters. Now most of our focus is on entertainment, our eyes glued to the screen – whether it’s television, video games, the computer, smartphone, etc. We have fallen into the trap of being distracted and looking at the wrong agenda.

Corporate establishments: “Look to these stars,”

” – instead of these stars.”

Corrupt organizations: “Trust NASA the science,”

From ‘solarsystem.nasa.gov’

– but not this:”

Immoral government encourages satanic worship:

Yet denounces Jesus:

 

The terms “Apollo moon landing” and “flat Earth” are just two of a very small list of trigger words that will initiate an “information bar” on youtube videos?

Youtube Trigger Words

Bottom line, while I may not know the exact “science” or truth of our existence or reality, here are the things that I DO KNOW:

– You can’t trust man.
– You can’t trust NASA (and many more corrupt organizations).
– You CAN keep searching for the truth; and when you do – you may “see” things you’ve never even thought possible before.
– The world is full of mysteries, and we’re not even close to scratching the surface of what it all means.
– Love is the answer.

These are the things that I KNOW.

As for everything else, the important thing is to keep seeking, keep searching, and keep the faith. While many may think the world is a cesspool of sin and corruption, there are an ever-growing number of people waking up to the truth.

One last word of caution…

19 And take heed, lest you lift your eyes to heaven, and when you see the sun, the moon, and the stars, all the host of heaven, you feel driven to worship them and serve them, which the Lord your God has given to all the peoples under the whole heaven as a heritage.
Deuteronomy 4:19

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Ondřej Šponiar from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?

Exposing NASA’s Many Lies

Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.

Whew! What a rabbit hole, ladies and gentlemen.

After researching the NASA (national aeronautics and space administration) organization and the alleged space explorations they’ve been conducting, I’ve come to my own opinion that it is all one HUGE lie.

Below, we’ll take a look at the many, MANY times NASA has been caught lying, on top of other rather extremely suspicious circumstances.

Enjoy! (or don’t, being massively lied to by a billion-dollar organization on what they’re doing with people’s tax money… also thank the government for that.)

1. Caught staging a simulation or hologram?

The whole video makes a very interesting case about NASA and their illegitimacy, including CGI fakery, strange physics, continuity errors, etc. so I highly encourage viewing the whole video. But at the :30 second mark, you can see a gentleman literally disappearing through an entry port in this alleged spacecraft. This is just one of MANY times the “space exploration” teams have been caught using deception and different kinds of technology to simulate a trip into outer space.

2. NASA caught faking photos

Take a look at the following images and the bizarre excuses and “coincidences” that preside with it:

Some people will try and explain away this picture by stating that NASA had no other choice but to super impose duplicate areas of the Earth onto the image in order to fill in gaps (whatever that means…), but more than likely, someone in the editting room was just too lazy to render the fake image correctly, and quite possibly banked on the idea that people wouldn’t catch them in the act. And with the amount of shills pouring themselves over NASA (are they getting paid to do it?), knew that they would have some misled souls to come to their defense.

This isn’t the only example, by the way. There are tons of them. And this video also proposes additional theories as to what the planets could be textured by.

This image is directly shown on NASA’s own website, allegedly depicting the Earth in 2015. Now, either God is one huge practical joker, or NASA is pulling a fast one over the public’s eyes. Which one do you think it is?

The image on the left shows the landscape in Mauna Kea, Hawaii.

The image on the right shows the moon landscape from the Apollo 17 mission. (supposedly…)

By a bizarre set of pure coincidence, it just so happens that the Apollo 17 astronauts were able to land at a specific distance to that particular hill on the moon, which bears an uncanny resemblance to the same distance as the hill/summit of Mauna Kea. What are the chances?

Did I forget to mention? Mauna Kea was a direct training ground for the Apollo astronauts.

Investigating the Apollo Valley

Buzz Aldrin standing infront of the hills in Mauna Kea, Hawaii. There seems to have been some photo editing going on, as you can see the large mountain in the distance in this photo, but not in the other two. Unless it’s a matter of perspective being on the other side of the hills, coincidentally showing similar geographic terrain.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

This is, quite frankly, the stupidest picture I’ve ever seen. Especially since it’s coming from a corporation who “allegedly” spends billions of dollars a year to explore space, yet they expect us to believe that this is an “actual image” captured from one of their satellites that’s positioned a MILLION miles from Earth. (But hey, I guess they win, because apparently some people DO believe this is real. #sigh – 2016 Tournament Earth Champion: The Dark Side of the Moon)

I worry about the human race. : (

And here is the image of Earth captured from the Apollo 11 mission that supposedly landed on the moon in 1969.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

I don’t believe this is a real image either, but do we see any significant perspective changes between this image “taken in 1969” and the one from 2015? No? Just me? Did the Earth grow exponentially since then?

2011: “Now a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth.” – NASA research confirms it’s a small world, after all

Whew. I’m glad NASA could put that speculation to rest. Because after all, if it’s coming from NASA, it must be the truth. Still doesn’t explain how the two photos above both came from space though, while depicting the same objects with outrageous size differences. Unless between 2011-2015 the Earth did, in fact, grow to that massive size. Or the moon shrunk. Perhaps NASA will come out with another study to explain this.

3. “Astronauts” in water

The official claim made is that astronauts train underwater because it closely simulates what it would be like to be in outer space with the difference in gravity compared to Earth. However, even if this was a legitimate reason, how would that explain passing off these underwater escapades as actual “space exploration” footage for the public’s viewing pleasure?

This video makes a very compelling case exposing NASA trying to pass off underwater training as real outer space expeditions.

(Almost similar to how they were trying to pass off simulations from rocky Earth terrains as real moon landings…)

4. Obvious Hairspray is Obvious

If it’s a simple matter of keeping hair out of one’s face, even in zero g… then the usual routine would probably involve putting the hair up in a ponytail or a bun, and/or use hairpins.

But THIS:

is utterly ridiculous, and a waste of money.

Are we really to believe that just because someone puts on a ton of hairspray to deliberately style their hair to depict what it may look like in outer space, that everyone is just going to buy this notion and continue on with our blind faith in this dishonest institution?

Well, apparently, because as we all SHOULD know, hair obviously defies the laws of physics and just sticks straight up on space missions and then bounces back into a designated shape, even though a heavier, denser object – like metal (maybe a necklace, say, or a zipper) floats freely around.

And if you watch closely, you can also tell there’s something fishy about the gentleman’s necklace…

5. Responses of astronauts (both former and current) to certain questions/interviews

While Bart Sibrel is known for his “ambush” journalism, the takeaway from these interviews is that Mr. Sibrel makes these former astronauts extremely uncomfortable and extremely defensive.

If it was an honest manner of really going to the moon, like they’re claiming, then why are their reactions and responses so hostile, and even in some cases, fearful? Almost as if this investigative journalist is close to finding out the truth and the men involved in this corruption/coverup have been coerced into silence and they take out their vitriol on anyone who comes close to exposing this egregious scheme.

There are many more examples than just this, in which we can see the awkwardness and uncertainty in some of the officials being interviewed, and it lends a significant distrust in the eyes of the public. (At least, if the people haven’t been completely brain-washed by the different establishments – government/education/media, etc.)

Here’s a look at some different transcripts from other cringe-worthy interviews:

If you watch the link connected with this Q/A,  pay close attention to the “astronauts’ ” body language and nervous expressions. Not to mention the rather telling response that was given:

Question:What can we do in an age where, so many people seem so skeptical about what they see and hear to assure them that what they’re seeing from us is, as you explore space is actually real, and uh, can you also tell us where over the Earth you are, about right now?

Answer:Well I think uh, it’s our duty to continue to just produce imagery of all types. Video imagery and still imagery, and we’ll do it with a, integrity, and uh, and the more we put out there the more real it becomes to everyone.

NASA Busted! Clone tool overusage. Space is a photoshop production!

Keep in mind, low-Earth orbit is considered to be between 160-2,000 km (99-1200 miles), and by NASA’s own admission, the moon (which astronauts allegedly landed on in the late 60’s-70’s) is estimated to be ~384,000 km (238,855 miles).

3:37 – 3:50:But we’re also really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we’re going forward with exploration. I think, uh, humans are naturally driven to do this, and this is really the beginning, I think, of human beings leaving low-Earth orbit.

4:08 – 4:51:The plan that NASA has is to build a rocket called SOS, which is a heavy-lift rocket. It’s something that is, that is much bigger than what we have today, and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destinations beyond Earth orbit.

Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That’s the farthest that we can go. And this new system that we’re building is going to allow us to go beyond, and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore, so- the moon, Mars, asteroids, there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually.

NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

6. A threat to contact CIA to “wax” a researcher

At the end of Bart Sibrel’s “interview” with Ed Mitchell – as we can see at the end of the “Astronauts Gone Wild” video posted above, we not only have the direct threat from Mr. Mitchell to get a gun and shoot Bart, but then his son speaks up and says quite plainly, “Want to call the CIA and have them waxed?

Waxed for what, exactly? Questioning the NASA narrative that the moon walk was real? Coming to that house/office under “false pretenses”? Accusing him of satanic participation? (Michael Aquino, anyone?)

Are these legitimate reasons to have someone waxed? What about using taxpayers’ money to fraudulently claim to going to the moon just to have something to show for it while using that money for other reasons? Why are all these astronauts so concerned with the moral ethics of this journalist, and not their own moral ethics for possibly lying to billions of people while simultaneously protecting the industry who is working to deceive and manipulate everyone into following a certain scientific belief?

As some people have proposed, could these “astronauts” have been mind-controlled by the CIA into believing the very tale that the government/NASA has perpetrated worldwide, and/or these astronauts inherently know that they are in the wrong, but are under compliance as a means of “national security”?

After all, if the son of Edgar Mitchell was so cavalier as to announce that they basically have the CIA on speed dial (I may be embellishing the story a little – but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was close to the truth) to “take care of” opposition, it ties into the theory that the CIA was(is) indeed closely tied to the NASA missions. – NASA’s Secret Relationships with U.S. Defense and Intelligence Agencies

7. NASA logo

Not everything has to be about exposing the lies and cover-up that NASA in engaged in. Just take a look at their logo, which is obviously meant to depict a snake tongue flicking out towards Earth.

Why is that so suspect?

Well, when you have several other organizations, like the WHO (medical industry in general) and the Vatican, both of which are, imho, corrupt factions, that use a snake as their logo – not to mention the biblical side of things depicting the serpent as the wicked, sinful entity causing the fall of man, AND the fact that the serpent (many who claim is Satan/Devil/Lucifer) is called the “FATHER OF LIES” and “THE DECEIVER” – along with many other flattering nicknames, it makes one wonder the true reason why they would use the snake as their logo.

(Not to mention there’s some heated debate that nasa literally means “to deceive” in Hebrew. A lot of people claim that tptsb love to use symbolism and play on words/origin to indicate what they’re doing in secret. Another interesting coincidence: Neil A. (Armstrong) is “alien” backwards. Funny how he was the very first person that landed on the moon.)

Sure some may argue that it’s not really a snake tongue and instead some ribbon or some yada yada yada, but research into these organizations and their motives would suggest otherwise.

Back in 1830, there is an account of a vision of Mary who appeared to St. Catherine Labouré and told her to make a model of this vision: Mary, standing on a snake, which is curled on top of the Earth. What does this “Miraculous Medalreally mean?

8. Excuses, excuses, excuses

When was the last time we went to the moon?

1972? But why?

Because of this?

US spaceflight operations were focused entirely on Low Earth Orbit activities, as well as admirable cooperative international programs such as the International Space Station, and major scientific instruments such as Mars Pathfinder, Opportunity/Spirit and Curiosity. Other major concerns have redirected US attentions from spaceflight: the United States’ War on Terror, which is expected to cost US taxpayers over $5 trillion dollars in the long run.The Real Story Of Apollo 17… And Why We Never Went Back To The Moon

Really?

Or how about this reason?

A 2005 report by NASA estimated that returning to the moon would cost about $104 billion ($133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $120 billion in today’s dollars.

Manned exploration is the most expensive space venture and, consequently, the most difficult for which to obtain political support,” Cunningham said during his testimony.Astronauts explain why nobody has visited the moon in more than 45 years — and the reasons are depressing

(Yes. Please don’t waste ANYMORE taxpayers money on staged programs that are a complete farce. Thank you.)

Maybe it’s THIS reason: ALIENS Here’s the real reason why NASA never returned to the Moon (Video)

Or this laughable reason: I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

No, I think the real reason is that we’ve never been to begin with.

9.  Debate on the physics of the spacecraft landing

This is just a supposition, but if NASA really did go to the moon in 1969, and the total weight of the lunar lander when it landed was supposedly around 24 tons, of course not counting the gravity difference between the moon and the Earth (if that is even true…), one could wonder why there is no apparent disturbance to the ground underneath the spacecraft. Even a light bicycle will kick up some dust and disturb the terrain, depending on the conditions of the ground, of course.

Yet with this event, we are to believe that a 24 ton spacecraft merely spread out dust away from underneath the landing area and did nothing more to the ground. Due to our limited knowledge of the exact nature of the moon’s composition, it is honestly hard to say what this massive spacecraft could do.

However, if we take the following video into account, showing how easy it was for Neil Armstrong to disturb the dust around his feet, even kicking up the dust in a similar fashion to that of Earth:

And then seeing one of the legs of the craft on the solid ground, undisturbed by any collection of dust/sand/etc., compared to the footsteps RIGHT NEXT to it, clearly showing deep impressions from a much lighter object (a human being), I’m going to have to call B.S. on this whole operation. Even with the amount of distribution at the bottom of each leg, the physics of this phenomena do not add up.

And it is NOT indented into the ground on one side, as some people have proposed:

As with everything that NASA has been caught out on, they have some “scientific mumbo-jumbo” to try and back themselves up, as well as the poor deluded people that refuse to believe anything untowards is happening; other than conspiratorial minds just coming up with “crazy theories” due to their paranoia, that is. Refusing to look at the data and the evidence and instead just becoming talking points for this deceptive company and rehashing everything they’re peddling, is a tragic sign of how far mass manipulation has become.

10. “Moon rocks” came from Earth

Soon after Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins’ return to Earth from the Apollo mission, a moon rock was given to Willem Drees Jr. as a gift:

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing.” – Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

However, after scientific study of this rock, concluded that it was actually petrified wood.

And from the Apollo 14 mission, a 1.8 gram specimen was suspected of coming from Earth, having many qualities of rock compositions from our planet than what scientists would expect from the moon.

Research author Professor Alexander Nemchin, from Curtin’s School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said in a statement the tiny 1.8-gram sample of Moon rock is similar in composition to granite.

The expert said: “The sample also contains quartz, which is an even more unusual find on the Moon.”

Professor Nemchin also added, “It is possible that some of these unusual conditions could have occurred very locally and very briefly on the Moon and the sample is a result of this brief deviation from normality.

However, a simpler explanation is that this piece was formed on the Earth and brought to the surface of the Moon as a meteorite generated by an asteroid hitting Earth about four billion years ago, and throwing material into space and to the Moon.” – NASA Moon landing SHOCK: Apollo 14 Moon rock sample came from EARTH – Not from space

Uh huh. An even simpler, simpler explanation is that they never went to the moon at all.

BONUS:

The questionable build of the lunar lander aside (just look at it), while capturing just the little bit of Earth off in the distance in 1969… compared to their award-winning Earth and moon photo in 2015/2016…

lol

It’s crazy the amount of things that NASA has been caught fibbing in; from their numerous shady interviews with supposed astronauts, who can’t come to the same conclusion of whether they could see stars in space or not, to the very obvious fake images. Keep in mind, this is just a very small list of the suspicious actions that NASA has engaged in. And it’s even crazier that people still believe these lies.

Sadly, until people open their eyes and finally concede that NASA and the government have been implementing this duplicitous scheme, the world will continue to be led astray. “Space” is not the answer.

And on another rather related mystery, I propose that there may just be a dome/firmament around us (that the world leaders don’t want us to know about), but that is another topic for a different day.

For additional reading into NASA’s very suspicious establishment, please visit the following websites:

NASA’S TRILLION DOLLAR TREASON
Something Shady About NASA
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?

Does the World Seem to Hate You?

If so, you may be on the right track.

Does it seem like the world has suddenly flipped upside down and everything you thought was “right” and “moral” is now being labeled as “white privilege/supremacy”, “hate speech”, “conspiracy theories”, “inciting violence”, “misinformation”, etc.?

You’re not alone.

Although “the world” may try and lead you to feel that way.

It’s fascinating. Because this is exactly what Jesus warns us about.

17 This is my command: Love each other. 18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.
John 15:17-19

This is fascinating to me, because it does imply a separation from those who belong to Jesus, and those who belong to the world. And who is ruler of the world…?

31 Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out. 32 And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.”
John 12:31-32

The Bible defines the ruler of this world as satan. So if the world hates you, one can infer that it is the followers of satan (even if these people don’t realize that they are following satan – if they pride themselves on their financial wealth, their possessions, how many likes/followers/fans they have, their looks, their career, etc. – then they are “of the world” – and therefore followers of satan – I don’t mean to be blunt, but this is what I’ve gathered from various sources/research) that hate you. Some are fully aware that they are followers of satan/the world, and have no bones about it. But I truly believe that some people are unaware of it and are unknowingly being led astray.

Now, on the other hand, if you don’t really care about fame, fortune, prestige, etc. and instead care about integrity, honesty, kindness, compassion… then you are followers of Jesus; again, even if you don’t realize it. And it is impossible to fool God. He knows what’s in your heart. So if the first thing you think about when you wake up is of a “worldly” matter, then you are following the wrong path. On the other hand, if you often think about positivity, kindness, love and forgiveness – then you are closer to the “Christ consciousness” and going farther from the ideations of the world. The big thing, again, is to realize that God knows what’s in your heart and if you are truly a good person, even if you may idolize some of the creations “of the world”. If you have any inkling that this is resonating with you, then it very well may be that God/Jesus is calling you out of this world. (And you will be hated for it – by those of this world.)

Now we have to ask ourselves, even if we don’t believe in the Bible, even if we think the tale of Jesus is just that, a myth based on story-telling, we have to ask ourselves, if it is true, why would a certain group of people hold so much animosity towards a person or group who was simply teaching others to be kind, loving and compassionate towards one another, and/or teaching them to do the right thing and have integrity and who remain steadfast in their core values (some even based on “science”, moral ethics and facts)? Even if it was “just a fairy-tale”, you cannot tell me that there are not modern day versions of this very same thing happening today.

Those who are speaking out against what they feel is immoral or questionable is quickly being silenced and censored. If certain people don’t agree with a certain narrative, the media and like-minded people are primed and ready to jump on the lynching band-wagon. These very same people hold many similarities to the mobs who voted for Jesus’s crucifixion. The elders and priests were able to convince the crowd to release a murderer (ironically also called Jesus (Barrabas)) – instead of Jesus Christ, who did no wrong. This crowd was then “incited to violence”, demanding Jesus’s crucifixion.

19 While Pilate was sitting on the judge’s seat, his wife sent him this message: “Don’t have anything to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered a great deal today in a dream because of him.”
20 But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd to ask for Barabbas and to have Jesus executed.
21 “Which of the two do you want me to release to you?” asked the governor.
“Barabbas,” they answered.
22 “What shall I do, then, with Jesus who is called the Messiah?” Pilate asked.
They all answered, “Crucify him!”
23 “Why? What crime has he committed?” asked Pilate.
But they shouted all the louder, “Crucify him!”
24 When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “It is your responsibility!”
25 All the people answered, “His blood is on us and on our children!”
26 Then he released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.
Matthew 27:19-26

Why were these priests/elders/rulers so dead set against Jesus Christ? It’s because Jesus Christ stood for everything they didn’t. They wanted their sinful freedom and didn’t appreciate Jesus Christ calling them out for their wickedness. These people were followers of their god, and not The God, although they deceived others into thinking they did. They and the people of the crowd found themselves more in common with the murderer Barbarras, which is why they’d rather save him than Jesus, which they knew would continue to give them a bad image, since it was extremely hard to put away their pride and desires and follow in His footsteps. They’d rather do away with Him and continue to live guilt-free in their sin.

Now there is another verse that I want to address in addition to everything that’s been going, especially as of late, and that is:

20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, and shrewd in their own sight!
Isaiah 5:20-21

Does this remind you of anything happening lately when addressing pretty much anything of a political/religious nature? And even if intentions were not based on anything political but merely one’s opinion, it is still drowned in and accused of political and (extremely in the last few months) racial overtones. Even when it doesn’t make sense!

Then we have the blatant disregard for protecting innocent lives and instead, corrupt officials are protecting the depraved perpetrators instead.

In my opinion, there’s no doubt that we are seeing the very things that the Bible foretold would happen taking place in today’s time. Going back to the earlier verse where certain people will call “evil good and good evil” and this one:

1 Then I said,
“Listen, you leaders of Jacob, you rulers of Israel. Should you not embrace justice,
2 you who hate good and love evil;
...
9 Hear this, you leaders of Jacob, you rulers of Israel, who despise justice and distort all that is right;
Micah 3:1-2 / 3:9

People may want to deny it; people may want to say, ‘rules and social norms are changing to be more inclusive, more tolerant, more compassionate’, but I submit to you that this is exactly the deceiving corruption that the Bible warns us about. There were certain immorality issues that were normally opposed and questioned about the ethic and natural ramifications that would be brought about if we continued down this path by the Vatican itself, a once powerhouse on religious tradition. Who have now changed their stance on several things, even the very practices that their religion was built upon.

Vatican corruption and conforming to the world?

Abortion

(May 2019) On the subject of abortion, the Pope says, he always asks two very clear questions: “Is it fair to eliminate a human life in order to solve a problem?”. The answer to which is: no. “Second question: is it fair to pay a sniper to solve a problem? No. Abortion is not a religious problem in the sense that just because I am Catholic I must not seek an abortion. It is a human problem”, says Pope Francis. “It is a problem of eliminating a human life. Period”.
Pope talks McCarrick, walls, women’s rights, abortion and more in interview

(December 2020) The Vatican concluded that “it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses” in the research and production process when “ethically irreproachable” vaccines aren’t available to the public. But it stressed that the “licit” uses of such vaccines “does not and should not in any way imply that there is a moral endorsement of the use of cell lines proceeding from aborted fetuses.”
Vatican permits use of Covid vaccines made using aborted fetal tissue

Homosexuality

(2003) Under the direction of Pope John Paul II, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 2003 had stated that “respect for homosexual persons” was not “approval of homosexual behavior” or “legal recognition of homosexual unions,” the agency said.

Legal recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on the same level as marriage would mean not only the approval of deviant behavior … but would also obscure basic values which belong to the common inheritance of humanity,” the doctrine said, according to CNA.

(2010) Pope Francis opposed efforts to legalize same-sex marriage in 2010 while he was archbishop of Buenos Aires, and has only been “circumspect” in his support of civil unions, CNA noted.

(October 2020) Pope Francis has spoken up in defense of homosexual families and called for civil union laws for same-sex couples — a major shift from both his own and the Vatican’s position on the matter.

“Homosexuals have a right to be a part of the family. They’re children of God and have a right to a family,” the pontiff says in a new documentary, “Francesco,” according to the Catholic News Agency (CNA).

What we have to create is a civil union law. That way they are legally covered,” the pope said. “I stood up for that.

Pope Francis calls for civil union laws for same-sex couples

Changing Traditional Prayer

Original Lord’s prayer states: “lead us not into temptation”

Original Gloria passage states: “Peace on Earth to people of good will”

(June 2019) Against the judgement of numerous outspoken traditional Catholics, Pope Francis decided to officially changed the wording of the Lord’s prayer. In Matthew 6:13, instead of it reading “lead us not into temptation” it will now be “do not let us fall into temptation.

In Gloria, the passage will change from “Peace on earth to people of good will” to “Peace on Earth to people beloved by God.”

Pope Francis’ Controversial Break from Tradition: Why Did He Change the Lord’s Prayer?

Sex Abuse Coverup

(2018) In spite of knowing about former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual assaults, Pope Francis lifted sanctions from him that had been imposed by Pope Benedict.

LifeSiteNews is reporting that Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, former papal nuncio to the United States, has written an 11-page statement testifying that Pope Francis was aware of McCarrick’s homosexual predation but “continued to cover him,” even making him “his trusted counselor” in naming bishops for appointment, including Cdl. Joseph Tobin of Newark, New Jersey (McCarrick’s former diocese) and Cdl. Blase Cupich of Chicago, Illinois.

“In this extremely dramatic moment for the universal Church, he [Pope Francis] must acknowledge his mistakes and, in keeping with the proclaimed principle of zero tolerance, Pope Francis must be the first to set a good example for cardinals and bishops who covered up McCarrick’s abuses and resign along with all of them,” Viganò writes.

Pope Francis Knew About McCarrick, Covered for His Sexual Crimes

(2019) In his first direct comments about the case of former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Pope Francis said that “about McCarrick I knew nothing, obviously, nothing, nothing.

“I said it many times, I knew nothing, no idea,” Francis said in an interview with Mexican journalist Valentina Alazraki.

Speaking about the allegation made by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, who claimed last August that he had told the pope about Vatican-imposed restrictions against the former Archbishop of Washington, Francis said that “I don’t remember if he told me about this. If it’s true or not. No idea! But you know that about McCarrick, I knew nothing. If not, I wouldn’t have remained quiet, right?

In new interview, Pope Francis says he ‘knew nothing’ about McCarrick

Financial Scandal

(1942 / 2013 / 2016) Financial scandal at the Vatican is nothing new. The Vatican’s official bank has faced repeated crises since it was founded in 1942, and the bank itself was created to curtail fiscal irregularity.

But when Pope Francis was elected in 2013, it was with a mandate to clean up finances. His efforts began well: The pope regularized accounting procedures, committed to European anti-corruption standards, and by 2016, the Vatican had contracted the global accounting giant PriceWaterhouseCoopers to conduct the first serious external audit in its history.

But the pope’s reform project was stymied at every turn by seasoned Vatican bureaucrats with more ­influence and support than the group tasked with reforming their bureaucracy. A powerful Vatican official, Archbishop Giovanni Becciu, unilaterally canceled the planned audit in April 2016. The next year, the Vatican’s auditor-general was forced out, allegedly after he discovered financial improprieties on the part of his superiors.

The Vatican’s new corruption scandal

(November 2019) Pope Francis admitted there is financial corruption in the Vatican, describing it as a “scandal” on Tuesday. The pope’s statement marked the first time he has acknowledged corruption in Vatican finances.

There is corruption, it’s clear. With the interrogations we will see if they are guilty or not. It is an ugly thing, it’s not nice for this to happen in the Vatican,” Francis said during an in-flight press conference on the way back from Japan.

The pope told reporters that there was a Vatican investigation underway into the allegedly fraudulent use of the Peter’s Pence, the pope’s charity fund, to buy a luxury property in central London. The pope has previously said that such a purchase is not necessarily a misuse of charity funds.

What happened, happened: a scandal. They did things that do not seem clean,” the pope said.

Pope Francis: ‘There is corruption in the Vatican’

Does it seem like even the Vatican is conforming to the “rules of the world”? (Or, perhaps, is “the world” conforming to the Vatican’s new, controversial mandates and following their lead on who to pardon? Who is ruling who, here?)

2 Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
Romans 12:2

So when the whole world opposes your views, your opinions, your beliefs, will you cave in to demand and conform? Or will you continue to stand for what you believe in and resign to being hated by those “of the world”? Are you okay knowing, even though you’re trying to be a better person, that the whole world will shun you and uprise against you? Do you have the courage to refuse to follow the demands of an ever-changing, and growing morally corrupt world?

9 “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me.
10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other,
11 and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people.
12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold,
13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
Matthew 24:9-14

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Wessels De Wet from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The REAL Purpose of the Covid “Vaccine” - IT IS NOT FOR YOUR BENEFIT
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun? - Please share and spread awareness.
Reiner Fuellmich on suing the WHO / Jerm Warfare (Transcript) - Dr. Reiner Fuellmich to Lead 1,000 Lawyers and Over 10,000 Medical Experts in Trials of Crimes Against Humanity
Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative - Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.
Vaccination Deaths/Frontline Workers Testimonies & VAERS Reports - Vaccination Deaths / Side Effects / Adverse Reactions
Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time - Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time...
Revealing Some Controversial Themes About the “Sound of Freedom” Movie, Starring Jim Caviezel - Jim Caviezel portrays Tim Ballard. But is everything on the up and up?