W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic

STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.

It is extremely important to learn about our history, because as this year has shown, not recognizing the troubles and past circumstances – especially when dealing with our very lives and those of our loved ones – is causing untold turmoil and unnecessary deaths/injuries.
 
The below video is an insightful and historic account of how quickly we forget (and/or didn’t realize) about what happened in the not-so-distant past. I would highly, highly suggest checking it out and sharing. It is CRUCIAL to understand the events that have led up to the situation we see ourselves in today. We must learn to recognize attacks on not only our health, but also our whole livelihood.

I have highlighted some key parts of it below, but the whole video is well worth the watch. Do the events sound familiar to you? What if we replaced the word “swine flu/h1n1/influenza” with “coronavirus”? This video is an eerie look back at the 2009 events and the goal, even at that time – 12 years ago – of the exact same thing we’re seeing today. It was never about the “virus”; and it was never about our health.

Source: odysee | Do You See What I See Productions | A-Necessary-Look-Back-at-the-Swine-Flu-Plandemic

Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

“So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as a prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe in the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.”

[00:00-00:18] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “After this health crisis, a new political force will be installed.

It will be the World Health Organization, the one in charge of organizing the enforcement of these things, also the U.N.”

[00:35-04:52] Jane Bürgermeister 2009: “And it will happen at the same time, more or less, in parallel in all countries, because all countries follow the same schedule for voluntary vaccinations.”

“And after this period, every government estate will be joined into a single, new structure, that will incorporate itself under the W.H.O. and U.N.”

(Some politicians have already suggested) “that the W.H.O. should be the natural global health authority. There are other clear plans for the creation of a world government. And the pandemic seems to be the means to this goal, the same as this vaccine also an instrument is, to fulfill that old dream of a single world power.

What I am stating here is that there is a secret biological war going on, an undeclared biological warfare against civilians is being waged, because it is carried out by a small group, against a larger majority of billions of people, carried out with cunning and deception.

So what is technically a biological weapon is being sold to us as prophylactic, and if we don’t take it voluntarily, if we don’t believe the hysteria of the Media, we are finally forced to take it.

What we see is the World Health Organization trying to succeed in enforcing vaccination on all people, a system according to which they’ll keep data about all people for the rest of their lives.”

“At meetings, many governments deny that they intend this, they state that it will be voluntary and so on, but all the while they are building the infrastructure for forced vaccinations.”

“You might say, “How is something like this possible?” “How can our health officials do this?” “What are health safety institutions doing, the Media…” “How can every security step be failing us?”

I believe this plan has been thought over many, many years. And unfortunately, many officials were “bought”. 

We have to accept that officials in charge of protecting people are actually not giving warnings and they let these things happen.

If I could have access to the documents of my research, then also they could.”

“An important role in this sad story is played by Media; as I said, I have learned myself that the important information never comes from Media, and as credible as it sounds, I have seen for myself how systematically it’s just a propaganda instrument.”

“Exactly because Media doesn’t report some essential facts, and instead just goes over trivial everyday stories, most people are absolutely clueless about what’s going on here.”

“It’s up now for each citizen to say: I will influence political events – “

Setting the stage for the Media hysteria

[05:44-06:35] WHO Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan: “On the basis of available evidence, and these expert assessments of the evidence, the scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met.

I have therefore, decided to raise the level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 5 to phase 6. The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.

Influenza pandemics, whether moderate or severe, are remarkable events. Because of the almost universal susceptibility of the world’s population to infection.

We are all in this together.”

Essentially impossible to distinguish between regular seasonal flu vs. 2009 H1N1 influenza

[06:59-07:47] : How can a person tell if they have the regular flu seasonal flu or if they’ve contracted the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus?

Anthony Fauci:Well, for a person, him or herself to be able to determine that, would essentially be impossible, because you can get everything from very very mild illness to severe illness with either seasonal flu or the H1N1 new 2009 pandemic flu. Most of the time it’s a mild disease, but there are unusual cases that can be severe. The only way a person can tell is if they get their blood drawn or other laboratory tests, which could specifically distinguish between one and the other. But that is something that is not done routinely.”

Role-playing? News anchor and correspondent look amused while discussing if they had swine flu. /
Also, “testing really doesn’t matter”

[07:48-10:26] Anderson Cooper: “As of tonight, more than 41,000 Americans have been infected with an H1N1 or swine flu virus. Maybe you know someone who’s come down with it.

We do. Our very own Sanjay Gupta. Our chief medical correspondent got the virus during a recent trip to Afghanistan. Sanjay said it was the sickest he’s ever been. He joins us now to talk about it; he’s a physician and a patient – Uh, Sanjay, first of all, how do you feel now?”

Sanjay Gupta: “You know, I feel fine, now, Anderson. And you know, it’s worth pointing out, you and I talked about this while we were both in Afghanistan, and you were quite sick as well. I’ve come to find out later on that the H1N1, the swine flu as it’s called, was circulating quite a bit, Anderson, in the area that we were in.”

Anderson Cooper: “Was it really? No one mentioned that to us. Or at least not me.”

Sanjay Gupta: “I know, I mean, you know, frankly speaking, we can talk about this now via satellite but you know, there’s a good chance, based on everything that I’m hearing, that you also had H1N1 virus infection.”

Anderson Cooper: “Well, cause I – I mean, I had similar symptoms to you, I was – the cough was the worst cough I’ve ever had, and it even hurt my heart when I was coughing, and I went to you, and you were really sick, and I asked you, “Is it possible it’s swine flu?” And you said, “Probably not, because usually swine flu has a very high fever right away.”

Sanjay Gupta: “That’s right. And you know, it’s interesting because I think the next day, I think maybe you had gone to a different province and I, I was feeling miserable the next day and I hadn’t checked my temperature, you know; you’re in the desert, it’s hot outside. Hadn’t really thought about it. I went there and my temperature was around 102 degrees, so, you know, pretty high for certainly for me, 98 being normal and 98.6.

So that was the first sign and then, you know, I had that same cough that you did. Light-headedness, and I was freezing cold. I don’t know if you had that as well. [Anderson Cooper: “Yeah.”] But that was really the most memorable part of it. I was freezing cold despite being in the desert.

Are you coughing right now?”

Anderson Cooper: “I- I’m still coughing. I will say. Just a little bit.”

Sanjay Gupta: “Thought I just heard that, yeah. I have a little bit of a cough as well. I don’t think we’re contagious though.”

Anderson Cooper: “I love that I just learned that I may have had swine flu from you, via satellite. Um, but what was it like? I mean, it was for you, you said it was the worst, worst sickness you ever had?”

Sanjay Gupta: “It really was. And I don’t get sick very often. I mean, I can’t remember the last time I was sick. I don’t remember the last time I had the flu. But this really floored me.

I think the day after you and I talked about it, the next morning, I was trying to get out of my sleeping bag, I could barely take a couple of steps without feeling really light-headed. And again, those just profound chills and shakes, despite the fact that it was over a hundred degrees outside. And then when I went to the – I went to the clinic, they had a role, it’s a role three battlefield clinic. You know, they gave me some IV fluids cause I hadn’t eaten in a while, and they also did the swab.

What we know is that H1N1 is circulating around the world. You mentioned how many cases have already been, Anderson, and what most doctors have told me, most infectious disease doctors, is that the testing really doesn’t matter.

Fauci, director of NIAID, suggests to vaccinate highly vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and children as young as 6 months old

[13:25-14:32]: This year, do I get a shot for the 2009 H1N1 flu in addition to the regular flu shot?

Anthony Fauci: “Well, you certainly should get your seasonal flu shot. That’s for sure. When we talk about the vaccination program for the H1N1, we’d like to be sure that the 5 priority groups of individuals get the H1N1 that becomes available early on. We fully expect that we would have enough so that you can cover not only the priority groups, but anyone else who feels they want it and need it. So the answer is, yes you should get the H1N1.

The 5 priority groups are:

pregnant women
– people who are the caretakers, parents or what have you, of children less than 6 months old,
– healthcare workers
young children and young adults from 6 months to 24 years old
– and individuals from 25-64 who have underlying medical conditions that would compromise them”

Vested interests of academics, governments, W.H.O. and drug companies to push unproven vaccinations

[14:32-15:48] News Segment: “In clinical trials on volunteers began on Wednesday in Australia for vaccine against swine flu.

But leading researchers now raising serious questions about the way the world is responding to this pandemic.

Dr. Tom Jefferson says the response to the virus is driven by vested interests. Academics, governments, the World Health Organization, and drug companies who all stand to gain.”

Dr. Tom Jefferson: “By declaring ‘pandemic’, they’ve pushed the button on this juggernaut that they’ve created. And of course, antivirals are part of that, and vaccines are part of that, and the whole panel plays a part of that.

All I’m saying, is let’s act with a little bit of caution and common sense. And let’s look at the evidence, the hard evidence.

Until they actually get used, we do not know whether it will work. Their seasonal counterparts don’t have a very good track record. The evidence from the hundreds of studies that we synthesized, is that sometimes they work a little, and sometimes they don’t.

We’ve been brought up, people in my generation, to understand that a pandemic means deaths and a lot of serious cases. And that seems to have dropped out of sight, and they’re lowering the threshold, of a definition of a ‘pandemic’. And that is not a good thing. In many ways.

Swine flu not much worse than a bad cold. /
Natural immunity would provide better immunity than the vaccine.

[17:09-18:23] [Guest doctor]: “Now 3 months later, and as a GP I’ve seen dozens of cases of swine flu, we can see that overwhelmingly, in healthy adults, it’s a very mild illness. Really not much worse than a bad cold. And you will have to question whether or not once you’ve vaccinate a population against an illness that is no worse than a bad cold.

But remember as well that by the time we get this vaccine here, in the country, a lot of us will have come across the virus anyway. And we’ll have developed natural immunity. So we’ll have better and longer lasting immunity than the vaccine would provide already. Which would make a vaccine completely unnecessary.

As I’ve said, the vaccine is being fast-tracked; it’s being rushed onto the scene and the normal safety tests that are done before a vaccine is introduced will be very, very limited. And the last time that a vaccine was given nationally, against a swine flu pandemic, was in the U.S.A. in 1976. And then after vaccinating millions of people, they stopped that vaccination trial because of an increased rate of side effects. There was something called Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing disorder. But then so they had to stop the trial. And we don’t know that that’s not going to happen again – “

Children used as guinea pigs /
Mercury found in vaccines linked to autism, brain disorders and Guillain–Barré syndrome

[19:10-21:41] Priya Sridhar: “Joining me to discuss all of this is RT contributor and investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen. Wayne, thanks so much for joining me.

First of all, can you tell me, who has taken the swine flu vaccine so far and what have you heard about it?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well apparently there has been a test community used already. We’re also hearing that the vaccine that’s being developed, they’re saying it’s not for everyone. Apparently, children were used as uh, for lack of a better term, guinea pigs in Oklahoma. I know from talking to people in the research community, even scientists who helped develop the vaccine for smallpox are saying they’re not going to take the vaccine and urging their friends and family not to take this vaccine either.

Priya Sridhar: “And what kind of side effects did these children have, if any?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, contained in the vaccine is a component called thimerosal,  which has been proven – uh, half of it is composed of mercury. And it’s been proven to cause not only Guillain-Barré syndrome, but also autism, in young children. There’s been several court cases because of past vaccinations due to the autism issue.”

Priya Sridhar: “And so how will the swine flu vaccine be offered? Will it be mandatory for people? What have you heard about that?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well there was a conference here in Washington last week where we have two – two themes present. We have the research community, the medical community, saying, “Look, what we need to provide the public is good information and let them make the decision based on facts.”

We have the emergency community, the Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency people talking about forced vaccinations, forced quarantines… Basically the politicians running the show instead of the people who are from the medical community and know much better about the threat of this particular influenza.”

Reporter: “While there are fears the U.S. media is covering up the possible side effects of the swine flu trial vaccine, 28,000 human guinea pigs are sent to test the jab. Bad news outlets have so far kept their snouts clean over its link to rare brain disorder.”

Purpose of recalling 800,000 mercury-free vaccines intended for children…

[25:40-28:13] Reporter: “Health officials there are recalling 800,000 swine flu vaccines intended for children. They say their efficiency wears off after a short period of time. Now it comes as vaccination against H1N1 become available to any American who wants it.

Our correspondent Priya Sridhar – Priya, hi. This recall must have some people wondering what the whole point is in taking these vaccines. What is the feeling over there?”

Priya Sridhar: “Hi Kevin. Well, I think people have had reservations about this vaccine for a while. Previous reports showed that the vaccine may have been linked to the Guillain-Barré syndrome, and now this new report is say – causing many people to say, “What is the point?” And so joining me to help talk about this, is co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, Barbara Loe Fisher. Barbara, thanks so much for joining me.

So tell me about the latest numbers. 800,000 H1N1 vaccines that were supposed to be for children are now being recalled. What do you know about this?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Yes. Just this morning, Sanofi Pasteur recalled 800,000 doses of H1N1 vaccine. We think that it’s mercury-free vaccines – the single dose vials. I haven’t confirmed that, but if that’s true that means those children are going to be getting a multi-dose vial of vaccine that contains mercury. And of course mercury is something that a lot of parents in this country have been very concerned about giving their children through vaccination.

And, the issue is a lot of people in this country are not taking the H1N1 vaccine. There’s going to be potentially a surplus of vaccine that will then have to be disposed of. If it’s in the multi-dose vials that contain mercury, it will have to be disposed of under hazardous materials regulations. HAZMAT regulations. Because you can’t dispose of mercury in this country – mercury containing vaccines, by pouring it down the drain or throwing it into a regular garbage can. You have to undergo hazardous material regulations.”

Priya Sridhar: “And what are some of the concerns with the mercury?”

Barbara Loe Fisher: “Well the mercury has been associated with brain injury in children. Regression in children who have gotten these vaccines. Regressing into autism. It’s very controversial; the government denies that mercury has anything to do with these children’s autism.

But, in 1999, our Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration directed the vaccine manufacturers to take mercury out of childhood vaccines. But the flu vaccine, in multi-dose vials, contains mercury. And so I’m wondering what’s going on here with recalling these 800,000 doses of potentially mercury-free vaccines, and what’s going to happen with children who are going to get the mercury containing vaccines.”

[29:14-29:29] Barbara Loe Fisher: “There have been about 3,700 vaccine adverse events reported to the government, 12 deaths, 10 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, but this is only a tiny fraction of what’s actually occuring out there. Because most doctors don’t report vaccine adverse events to the government.

Compilation of news reports of children experiencing tragic side effects from the swine flu vaccine

[30:39-31:46]

Reporter: “6 year old Nikiyah Torres is all smiles now, but her mother Naomi Troy is still fuming about a medical mistake at PS 335 in Brooklyn. When a nurse there mistook Nikiyah for a new student, she was given an H1N1 vaccine, without parental consent.”

Naomi Troy: “She’s not a guinea pig. You don’t make a mistake with children lives.”

Reporter: “He has a lot of questions tonight after he said his son was given the H1N1 vaccination at school, without his permission. The child got the vaccination from Montgomery County Health Officials at Camargo Elementary School. But his dad says the child has other health issues that make this vaccination potentially dangerous.”

Reporter 1: “A Northern Virgina family dealing with a stunning turn of events. Their healthy, athletic son suddenly comes down with a debilitating illness. They believe that it’s connected to a swine flu vaccine he got 24 hours earlier.”

Reporter 2: “Thursday afternoon he got his flu shots. By 10 o’clock Friday morning he had chills and started feeling weak. And by 4 that afternoon, he was having spasms.”

Reporter: “A 4 year old Rochester boy is recovering tonight after nearly dying, after being vaccinated for H1N1.”

3 shots / booster shots recommended… “trust the government and health officials”

[32:31-32:41] Meredith Vieira: “Now you’re asking people to get 3; that’s a tough sell.”

Guest: “Oh, Meredith, I think you hit the nail on the head. This is going to be a public relations, ‘trust your government and your health officials’ public campaign.”

Package insert: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.”

[33:22-33:43] Deirdre Imus: “There’s 3 major reasons why the H1N1 for children is not safe. They say it right in the package insert, from the manufacturer, it says right here, virus vaccine manufacturer: “Safety and effectiveness of the H1N1 2009 vaccine have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or persons less than 18 years of age.” They say it right there! In the packaging insert!”

W.H.O.’s loyalty seems to be in pushing vaccines – continues to announce a “pandemic” when there isn’t one

[34:36-38:02] Wolfgang Wodarg [female voice over in English]: “And what I’ve heard from the W.H.O., my concerns have merely been strengthened. The only evidence we’ve heard is that many people were asked and figure was given to us how many people were asked, but no justification were given for the actions undertaken by the W.H.O.

So the core question remains, why was the definition of the pandemic changed? Mr. Fukuda repeated that we had a pandemic underway. That is to say that we have to look at the question as to how a pandemic is declared. And how the fears are then subsequently elate – that is to say, at what point do we say that there’s no longer a pandemic?

In October last year we knew that the flu had run its full course because they are at a season’s removed than we are, so we could observe Australia, the wave had passed, and there was a moreover a trigger which it was said the flu was a trigger which enabled people to be protected from other strains of the flu. So this is something that the W.H.O. knows and the W.H.O. still says ‘we have a pandemic underway, use up all the vaccines that we have in stock’.

I want to read you something, from the Associated Press, the 19th of May, 2009, precisely at the time when the discussions were underway as to what the phase of the pandemic was, [Wolfgang Wodarg in English]: ” – urge the World Health Organization to change its criteria for declaring a pandemic again.” So to take it back what they did. Saying the agency must consider how deadly a virus is, not just how far – not just only how far it spreads across the globe. Fearing a swine flu pandemic declaration could spark mass panic, and economic devastation, Britain, Japan, China and others, asked the global body on Monday to treat carefully before raising this alert.

Some cited the costly and potential risky consequences, such as switching from seasonal to pandemic vaccine. Even though the virus so far appears to be mild. In May already. All those national specialists asked W.H.O. to change the course; to change its direction.

And then, although no formal changes were made on Monday, W.H.O. said it would listen to its members request. ‘And it’s certainly something we look at very closely’, said Dr. Keiji Fukuda, W.H.O.’s flu chief.

This happened, and afterwards, the pandemic was declared on the 11th of June, and the vaccine was sold to everyone and children were vaccinated in vain. I just say this, this is a very serious facts we see and we knew this already when the pandemic was not yet – the alarm was not yet uttered. So I think it’s a very, it’s a very important thing to discuss about the definition of a pandemic.”

Explanation as to why W.H.O. continues to announce a pandemic

[42:40-42:57] Narrator: “Many countries, including Germany, Italy, France and Great Britain, concluded secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies before the swine flu incident. Which obliged them to purchase swine flu vaccinations; but only if the W.H.O. issued a pandemic level 6 alert.”

“Greatest medical scandals of the century”

[45:55-47:44] Jon Snow: “It is one of the greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health’s Chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills from millions of unwanted doses, the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation.

Our science correspondent, Tom Clarke, has this report.”

Tom Clarke: “64,000 people dead – tens of thousands hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions of the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government’s response: spending hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britains have died. And globally, the virus hasn’t lived up to our fears.

Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree.”

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: “There must be a process to get more transparency out of the decisions and the W.H.O., how they function and who is influencing the decisions of the W.H.O. And what is the role of the pharmaceutical industry there? I’m very suspicious about processes which are behind this pandemic.”

Tom Clarke: “They also want to probe ties between key W.H.O. advisors and drug companies.”

Paul Flynn: “Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies? Who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on the perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money?”

Are the pharmaceutical companies and W.H.O. running the show?

[47:45-48:01] Bill Dod: ” – will launch a probe into pharmaceutical companies accused of manipulating swine flu data. This follows a claim by a renowned German scientist that vaccine manufacturers pressured the World Health Organization into declaring a swine flu pandemic, seeking to increase profits.

RT’s Laura Emmett has more.”

Laura Emmett: “It was supposed to be a deadly pandemic. But it’s so far nothing more than a serious cold. And it’s left a lasting headache as a debate rages over pharmaceutical companies deliberately misled governments about the seriousness of swine flu to make them stockpile vaccines.”

Paul Flynn: “And I believe when we have a thorough investigation, and we look at this, we’ll discover that that’s the story: the world has been subjected to a stunt, for their own greedy interests of the pharmaceutical companies.”

The H1N1 virus may have started in a lab /
Bioethics? Or Bioterrorism?

[49:30-49:38] Bill Dod: “U.S. investigative journalist and RT contributor Wayne Madsen says he’s gathering more and more evidence that the H1N1 virus started out in a lab.”

[51:16-51:38] Priya Sridhar: ” – how exactly did this happen? This is the 21st century. I mean, how could something – how could these gene sequences get manipulated and then be disseminated throughout the country?”

Wayne Madsen: “Well, apparently what we are seeing is this could have been a product of some over zealous research on the part of the research scientist, the microbiologist, or there may be something more sinister.”

[52:44-53:06] Wayne Madsen: “Well I think what we have here is a situation with bioethics. They talk a good game in the research – medical research community about bioethics, but it doesn’t seem like there’s any method to enforce the ethics. And if, in fact, this was developed to make money for a certain bio-pharmaceutical companies, of course this is a case of bioterrorism.”

Deep corruption involves everything from contamination of vaccines, to attempts to vaccinate 6 billion people, to assassination of officials who refuse to follow the narrative

[57:25-57:52] Jane Bürgermeister “The vaccine gave her narcolepsy; a brain disorder associated with uncontrollable sleep attacks, hallucinations, and catalepsy. “I trusted them.” she said. “I trusted them. One injection and my whole life changed.”

50,000 people in Germany now have narcolepsy, according to a report in the Welt from January of this year. Every 6th sufferer is a child; the average age is between 15 and 25 years old. The governments of Norway, Sweden, Finland and Ireland have confirmed that the many cases of narcolepsy are due to the pandemic vaccine.”

[59:25-1:00:06] “Baxter nearly started a global pandemic in 2009 when staff contaminated 72 kilos of the seasonal flu vaccine material with a deadly bird flu virus, at its bio-security level 3 facilities in Austria. Baxter had also pre-negotiated contracts to sell the pandemic vaccine.

It has since emerged that Baxter is a site which is critical to U.S. security, according to leaked diplomatic cables published by wikileaks. The question is, who runs this bio-security facility? Is it the CIA? Is it a secret bioweapons lab? How could an instance as sudden as the kind that occurred in 2009 happen at Baxter’s facility?”

[1:00:36-1:00:44] “In 2009, plans to vaccinate 6 billion people around the world were activated by W.H.O. Yes. 6 billion people.”

[1:02:59-1:03:55] “In Poland, no one took the vaccine. Because the health minister, Ewa Kopacz, a doctor, decided that it wasn’t safe enough. “As a doctor, my guiding principle has to be not to damage others.” Kopacz told Polish parliament in 2009. “We will not buy the vaccine against the swine flu.” The Polish health minister was alone in refusing to trigger the pandemic vaccine contract with big pharma. Apart from Russia, a country which also doesn’t have chemtrails. And the Polish government paid a terrible price.

Just days after Ewa Kopacz gave evidence about the pandemic vaccine at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, PACE, 96 top Polish government and military officials were killed in a mysterious plane crash in Smolensk. Itself now the subject of inquiry after enormous amount of evidence showed that this was not an accident. But an assassination attempt.”

Stage is now set

[1:06:06-1:06:45] Jane Bürgermeister: “The stage is now set for another event to trigger a pandemic. This time an act of bio-terrorism could be used, and spark yet another fake pandemic, and push for global mass vaccination campaign. This time, W.H.O. laboratories controlled by big pharma would hype the virus even more than they did in 2009. 

There are more and more signs of the global elite are planning a pandemic scare soon. Big pharma companies have got greater control over the W.H.O.’s pandemic early virus warning system. Allowing them great opportunities for virus/pandemic hype.”

Thank you to the Do You See What I See Productions odysee channel for collecting this footage and compiling it into this video. It is an incredible flashback of the very same attempts that the pharmaceutical industries, media, health organizations, and government have engaged in, in order to enforce vaccines onto the whole world.

And thank you to all of the whistleblowers and reporters who were/are a part of trying to expose these crimes against humanity. Although we are once again repeating history and undergoing these same attempts from the same industries, it is my hope that more and more people become aware of these corrupt organizations and refuse to participate; and instead have courage and integrity and stand up for humanity’s rights and freedom.

Thank you for reading. God bless.

Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK

Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer

 

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

  • The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.
  • These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.
  • You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.
  • Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.
  • The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.
  • Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

  1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

  1. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease – as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS. Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

  1. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate. Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense – hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

  1. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere.

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed. For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

  1. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear.

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

  1. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses.

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains – especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination – is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified. Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

  1. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions.

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness. Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings. The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred. Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear. 

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

  1. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

  1. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed – without proper debate or rigorous analysis – to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

  • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.
  • The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines – which have no associated long-term safety data – could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

  1. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit – they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.

Conclusions

The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group – the elderly – the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with – according to the previous Health Secretary – a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here for the complete list of signatories and if you wish to add your name to the letter.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Prime Minister Boris Johnson during a press conference on 16 March, with Chief Medical Officer Prof Chris Witty and Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance. Picture by Andrew Parsons

FLASHBACK: In 2018, CDC Epidemiologist Timothy Cunningham Was Found Dead After Allegedly Claiming That the Flu Vaccine Was Causing Outbreaks

Are we sure the CDC is on our side?

As with anything built around intrigue and suspicion, “conspiracy theories” are bound to crop up.

Such is the case with the tragic disappearance, then death, of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, a CDC epidemiologist based in Georgia.

Because there is so much misinformation and conflicting agendas between multiple different sources, depending on one’s political/ethic leanings, it is difficult to piece together FACTS from these questionable circumstances.

So I am not attempting to debunk or fact-check these claims – just to reiterate that these are the claims that were made from these sources, and offer these pieces of information for the readers to consider.

In these times of deceit, especially when looking for honest answers about vaccine efficacy, I felt it prudent to revisit this case and the suspicious details that surround it.

The “FACTS”:

I put FACTS in quotes because I am merely repeating what multiple sources agree upon that actually happened during Timothy Cunningham’s disappearance and these are what has been more or less confirmed by the various different media: (although we must ask ourselves, can we even trust the media to begin with?)

– “Timothy Jerrell Cunningham was a Harvard-educated doctor with the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention. As an epidemiologist, he was a team leader in the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and was named in 2017 as part of the Atlanta Business Chronicle’s 40 Under 40 list.”wikipedia/Timothy J. Cunningham

-Timothy Cunningham was last seen on February 12, 2018, reported missing on February 14, 2018, and was found dead late Tuesday, April 3, 2018.

“Initial reports from a medical examiner’s autopsy revealed that Cunningham’s cause of death was drowning. Timothy Cunningham’s body was found along the Chattahoochee River, in an area that was inaccessible through walking”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

– Law enforcement did not find evidence of foul play and ruled it as a suicide by drowning. “Chief Medical Examiner Jan Gorniak said he committed suicide by drowning.”Cause of death released for CDC scientist Timothy Cunningham

– Timothy Cunningham’s belongings, most notably his house keys and wallet, were found inside his LOCKED home.

– Timothy Cunningham’s parents revealed to detectives that he sent them a “series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing.”Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

“His neighbor, Viviana Tory, said that Cunningham told her husband to have her erase his cell phone number from her contacts list.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Conflicting details of the case

A couple of things about this story I found rather odd and don’t line up, are these conflicting statements involving the officials’ interviews with CDC members, as well as the lead investigator and their assessment of Cunningham’s death.

The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention is discounting information that police released regarding missing employee Timothy Cunningham as erroneous.

In a statement from the government agency, officials said that information in the news that claimed Cunningham had been passed over for a promotion was untrue.

Those details were actually released by the Atlanta Police Department during a press conference on their ongoing attempts to find Cunningham, who went missing on Feb. 12 after leaving work and supposedly returning home. But the truth, according to the CDC, is the exact opposite.

On Feb. 27, Atlanta Police said on the day he went missing, Cunningham had a meeting.

“That meeting was to explain a promotion that he did not receive to branch manager. He had been informed the previous Monday that he was not getting the promotion but the explanation occurred on the morning of the twelfth,” the officer said.

The news CDC statement reads:

“In fact, he received an early promotion/exceptional proficiency promotion to Commander effective July 1, 2017, in recognition of his exemplary performance in the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS).”

11Alive reached out to Atlanta Police about the CDC’s statements and the agency is standing behind the information they released.

“Our information came directly from the CDC. Any further questions about Dr. Cunningham’s employment, or this statement issued by the CDC today, would need to be answered by the CDC,” the statement read.”

Source: Officials release conflicting details about missing CDC scientist

And during this reveal, it makes me wonder if some of the information got crossed, and the promotion that Dr. Cunningham allegedly got passed up for was for a different field altogether – although may still be involved with the CDC in a different branch. There are alleged documents that Dr. Cunningham actually resigned from a position called the RDF3 [Rapid Deployment Force 3] as an Infection Control Officer on February 7th. – Missing CDC scientist file: A ‘highly driven’ man struggling with personal, professional issues

And within the same link, states that he got passed over for a promotion on Feb 8th: “Thursday, Feb. 8 | Cunningham’s superiors tell him he did not get the promotion he was up for.”

Notice it says Cunningham’s “superiors” – but yet doesn’t state if those were specifically CDC superiors, or superiors of a different branch within the government agencies.

Then we have these rather strange conflicting statements:

“He [Major Michael O’Connor] added that they had interviewed friends, family, employees, and tracked his last movements, and could find nothing indicating foul play.”

“His parents, Tia and Terrell Cunningham, did say that they had received a series of worrying text messages and a phone call from him the night of February 11, the day before he went missing. They said they shared the details with detectives”

Source: Timothy Cunningham Cause of Death: How Did the Missing CDC Employee Die?

Hm… call me crazy, but if someone’s family divulged that their loved one, who recently went missing, sent a “series of worrying text messages” the DAY BEFORE THEY WENT MISSING (and who subsequently was found dead almost a month later), I most certainly wouldn’t rule out “foul play” at the drop of a hat… 

Regardless if the theories of Timothy Cunningham’s involvement with the CDC may have led to his death is true or not, the above conflicting statement alone is a red flag and should signal to anyone that there is a chance of foul play being involved – and shouldn’t even be a question coming from an experienced police unit.

And while we can’t expect these investigators to be miracle workers, there should still be a level of decorum and motivation/ambition when leading a missing person’s case and efforts to find cause of death, especially when so many events in this circumstance don’t add up.

Yet, we have this official statement about this case:

“Barring some new information coming forward – and obviously we’re checking, you know, we’ll check video, we’ll check places he might have got access to the river – but barring new information coming forward we may never be able to tell you how he got into the river,” O’Connor said.Timothy Cunningham: Why we may never know the whole story of CDC scientist’s disappearance

“On May 21, 2018, officials ruled his death a suicide. Toxicology tests showed nothing significant, there were no signs of trauma, and it was still not known how he ended up in the river. The investigation is now closed, Atlanta police have said.”Timothy Cunningham: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Uh huh. That definitely sounds like the determination of the Atlanta Police Department’s Homicide and Missing Person’s Unit to solve a case instead of attempting to cover it up. Which, by the way, I’m not saying conclusively is the agenda, but with other’s speculations and their own connections that maybe, just maybe, Cunningham’s involvement with his role at the CDC and the material he was exposed to did have something to do with his death is worth taking a look into.

Which brings me to:

The Theories:

There are a wide plethora of different theories, sources, assessments, attempts at piecing together this puzzle, etc. that can inevitably leave one running around in circles. As there is no absolute confirmation that these different possibilities are rooted in facts, the issue remains open to conjecture and supposition. And while many are sure that there is something sinister and underhanded going on in relation to Dr. Cunningham’s death and what he may have uncovered, we can’t overlook the possibility that he did indeed take his own life amidst a sea of misunderstandings and dreadful coincidences.

Of course, I have my own opinions, but opinions they will remain since I don’t know FOR SURE the reality of what happened.

With that being said, here are some of the speculations for further deliberation:

– An article by yournewswire alleged to have been contacted by Dr. Cunningham who provided the following statements in January under anonymity at the time:

“Some of the patients I’ve administered the flu shot to this year have died,” the doctor said in January, adding “I don’t care who you are, this scares the crap out of me.”
“We have seen people dying across the country of the flu, and one thing nearly all of them have in common is they got the flu shot,”CDC Doctor: ‘Disastrous’ Flu Shot Is Causing Deadly Flu Outbreak

– When it was revealed that Dr. Cunningham went missing in February, yournewswire sent out the following notice:

“In January, Dr. Cunningham shared his opinion that this year’s flu shot was behind the deadly outbreak of the flu, while warning that if his name was attached to the widely-circulated quotes, he would lose his job – or suffer an even worse fate.
Understanding the dangers involved in speaking out about vaccines in the current climate, we granted him anonymity in the article. However Dr. Cunningham told us we should go public should anything happen to him.”
CDC Doctor, Who Claimed Flu Shot Caused Outbreak, Missing Feared Dead

– While the following excerpt doesn’t specify the sources, it offers further details on what Dr. Cunningham may have been working on that led to this conspiracy:

“According to exclusive sources, he was startled with findings over the years regarding how flu vaccines amplify the side effects of viral infections rather than inoculate patients effectively.

In December of 2017, Cunningham was assigned to what was at the time a new project unofficially known as “Shogun.” According to our exclusive sources, testing and manipulation of the SARS strand were being used against a new drug that could eliminate a virus to infect your cells.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

The same article proposes that Cunningham discovered an agenda that sought to weaponize SARS; while scientists from Japan found an all encompassing cure – which obviously went against the purpose that pharmaceutical agencies were aiming for:

“Cunningham discovered that specific individuals in the U.S. were working on information they received from the Chinese regarding weaponizing SARS – with high specificity in virulence targeting particular genetic code and enzyme packets for transcription. In essence, the new virus would mimic that of HIV. A “smart” virus that could replicate all ligands of target cells not to be detected by innate immune cells and therefore “lie in waiting.”

“His knowledge? Japan created an all-encompassed cure, and pharmaceutical companies were seeking ways around it.”PURGED ARTICLE| Where is Timothy Cunningham’s Whistleblower Report on Coronavirus?

– Now if all of that wasn’t enough, there were also theories that Dr. Cunningham stumbled upon a plot that may have been aimed at African Americans specifically:

“The Harvard educated scientist had worked on tackling the Ebola and Zika outbreaks before his death. He is also believed to have been researching the effects of the FLU vaccine, on Black people.”Scientist Researching Effects Of FLU VACCINE On Black People At The CDC . . Ends Up DEAD IN RIVER!!!

– Granted, the above excerpt is taken from an African American News Network site, however, studies that Dr. Cunningham himself participated in lends credence to their assessment:

“Finally, of great concern is that blacks in their 20s, 30s, and 40s are dying of diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Which are typically seen in whites at older ages. This phenomenon has been described as weathering, meaning that the black population may be exposed to socioeconomic influences such as poverty and other environmental factors that can result in illness and death and earlier age than whites.”Transcript for Vital Signs African American Health | Press Briefing Transcript

“Compared with whites, blacks in age groups <65 years had higher levels of some self-reported risk factors and chronic diseases and mortality from cardiovascular diseases and cancer, diseases that are most common among persons aged ≥65 years.” Vital Signs: Racial Disparities in Age-Specific Mortality Among Blacks or African Americans – United States, 1999-2015

Please let me know if any of the links no longer work so I can update them with replacements.

So not only are there implications that Timothy Cunningham found a link between flu vaccines and unnecessary harm/death resulting in them, but he may also have made a connection between the increased illnesses in younger African Americans that may have been contributed by a failing health system – either unintentional, or very deliberate.

Side Note:

While I can’t vouch for the legitimacy of any website, I wanted to highlight the yournewswire website that initially ran the CDC whistleblower story to begin with. There have been many articles refuting their credibility, but what is true, at least according to Snopes (which, if it’s coming from Snopes to begin with, then extra caution should be applied…), stated the following:

“It is true the 2017-2018 flu season has been the worst one in years, and this season’s flu vaccine has been less effective than in the recent years. So not only is this year’s flu strain (H3N2) more rampant, but the main weapon against its spread isn’t holding it at bay.”

Source: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-cdc-flu-shot-causing-outbreak/

Hm… this incidence sounds strangely familiar and fairly recent… almost as if it’s going on RIGHT NOW.

Additional research shows that the efficacy of the flu vaccines for the 2017-2018 season was only 36%… according to the CDC. CDC: Flu vaccine 36% effective, highest for young children

Meanwhile, loaded with this CDC link, Snopes (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cdc-doctor-flu-shot-dead/) felt it prudent to point out how “YourNewsWire.com made several false statements in their article including that the flu vaccine is only 10 percent effective (it’s not — it’s 36% effective according to health officials)”,

yet failed to mention that the yournewswire website was simply stating what CBS news informed their readers: This year’s flu vaccine may only be 10% effective, experts warn. Which, you know, makes it NOT a false statement, and reflects the intellectual dishonesty that Snopes is known for.

But I digress. The point is, there are multiple sides to every story, but only ONE TRUTH.

Continuing on, I want to mention one last separate study that may or may not have connections with what Dr. Cunningham was presumed to have found.

CDC Deliberate Coverup of MMR Vaccines Linked to Increased Autism in African American Males

Although this event happened a few years before Dr. Cunningham’s death, it only adds fuel to the fire in regards to his involvement with the CDC, and his studies into epidemiology – and the presumed connections that vaccines may have had detrimental effects on people’s immune system; in addition to perhaps a very purposeful agenda to coverup inhumane testing on the public by inoculating them with so-called vaccines.

There has been such controversy surrounding Brian Hooker/William Thompson blowing the whistle on the CDC’s attempts to erase correlations between the MMR vaccine and the increased rate of autism in African American males, yet these efforts have still slid by the wayside and it seems as if no one has been held accountable for this egregious malfeasance and misconduct by the very group who is supposed to be protecting us from these “dangerous viruses” and inoculations that pose greater risk than the disease itself.

CDC Whistleblower Scientist Given Huge Bonus and Asked to Rewrite Fraudulent Vaccine-Autism Study

In fact, the CDC apparently blocked (I don’t know how that’s possible, to be honest – but due to technical legalities and “classified information”, NDA’s, blah blah blah, corrupt establishments can just hide behind a legal team and not address their own crimes – plus possible collusions with the legal system itself…) William Thompson’s capability to testify in court for a specific vaccine-related case. … Although he was granted whistleblower immunity, he has yet to be subpoenaed to testify.

CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

But it’s certainly not due to the fact that they have anything to hide, right? And it’s certainly not because they were engaging in awful, illegal human experimentation or anything like that. No, no. I’m sure the reason is because they simply don’t want confidential information out that they are secretly undercover heroes who are saving the whole world and must keep this secret purpose hidden, otherwise the REAL bad guys would know who to attack. I mean, what other possible reason would there be to “not allow” someone to testify?

“Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS.”CDC Blocks Testimony by Vaccine Whistleblower in Medical Malpractice Case

lol No kidding. The whole point of the testimony is to expose the CDC FOR THEIR OBJECTIVES, which would obviously not reflect what they want to continue fooling the rest of the world into believing that they’re working towards.

So all in all, am I proposing that Dr. Timothy Cunningham’s death could be related to William Thompson’s exposé of CDC’s concealment/destruction of evidence, with Cunningham’s own efforts at finding links between rising illnesses within the African American community – on top of the suspicious deaths/autism cases in some of the vaccine-inoculated individuals?

I’m saying that there is enough “circumstantial evidence” to warrant further investigation and research before dismissing it altogether. And keeping a closer eye on the CDC while we’re at it.

Source: odysee | Free From Censorship | Vaxxed – Documentary

DISCLAIMER: I mean no disrespect bringing up the tragic death of Dr. Timothy Cunningham, and only aim to bring possible injustices to light and spread awareness that the narratives we’re being told may not be the truth and may be intentionally hiding a corrupt agenda; and silencing those that may have been trying to expose it.

My heart goes out to Timothy Cunningham’s family and friends. If he was trying to expose corruption, then I hope and pray his wishes gets granted. And if you have any further information or clarification as to the events that happened, please feel free to contact me so I can add it and/or correct it.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Are “COVID Variants” Named After 5G Towers/Networks? | Delta, Kappa, Lambda, Mu… - The theories of "COVID" and 5G being connected rages on.
Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports? - "COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus"
Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.