Expanding on the first post I made in relation to this one: Suspicious Activity Surrounding Covid and the Vaccine, I am just going to get straight to the point. (Because if I state what I really want to, I will just end up on a long, frustrated rant.) So, without further ado, here you go:
1. CDC sent out TAINTED TESTS
Yes, folks, in case you didn’t know, at the very start of this whole “pandemic”, the CDC sent out batches of tests that were already tainted/cross-contaminated with SOMEthing that created a “false positive”. (and who’s to say that they’re still not contaminated?…Let’s just hope that the labs that all these tests were sent out to remain dutiful in their testing of these batches…)
What could do that, you may ask?
Well, who knows? Not me. I’m not a scientist, molecular biologist, medical researcher, etc. But what I can give you, is my best, educated guess. What could the test possibly be tainted with to present a positive result of “covid” on a covid test?
Well… maybe covid? Just throwing that out there.
Here are some articles and the time/date that it was allegedly created to follow the history of this development:
– Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says (original: February 12, 2020 | Updated on February 16, 2020)
– Ontario received 100,000 contaminated, unusable swabs for COVID-19 tests (April 10, 2020)
– Contamination at CDC lab delayed rollout of coronavirus tests (April 18, 2020)
Of course, some “fact-check” articles will refute that the virus itself had anything to do with the faulty test (although the main issue is that the test was tainted to begin with – but certain articles will specifically hand-pick certain articles to debunk, since, I suspect, it helps their narrative…), as website Politifact targets a Facebook meme that states “Covid-19 test HAS the virus “…the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent states tainted lab kits in early February that were themselves seeded with the virus, federal officials have confirmed.” ” – archive.fo
They will say something along the lines of, “Oh, it’s not for sure known that it was tainted with covid, specifically. It was never proven. It was just a different chemical reagent and/or due to a faulty lab set-up that attributed to the false positive.”
But these tests didn’t and couldn’t contain the live virus, as live virus isn’t used in test production in the first place. Meanwhile, the tests were early in their development and never made it to the stage of being used for patient testing.
– politifact.com (July 8, 2020)
Hm. I’m glad they cleared that up for me. Thank goodness for sites like politifact that will tell me how they fact check and debunk articles. It seems like they just assume that the tests couldn’t have been tainted with the virus itself simply by saying that “the live virus isn’t used in test production in the first place”. Seems good enough for me! …
Flu Does not Exist Anymore…
And even if these swabs weren’t already infected with coronavirus and instead was a different reagent like officials are claiming, then this would still be a very suspicious event surrounding what is becoming a turning point in history. The sudden absence and non-focus on the flu, which is normally a regular occurrence that happens every year, is now all but obsolete. Instead, we have the coronavirus, which presents symptoms almost identical to the flu. And the amount of “positive” cases, (due in part – or completely all of it – to faulty tests, as it is still occurring to this day) is unreliable and suspected to be highly exaggerated – as is stated from actual numerous medical health doctors.
Not to mention the attempt of a FDA official to address the CDC’s apparent ineptitude:
In late February, after an FDA official visited the CDC’s lab complex in Atlanta, he advised the CDC to discontinue manufacturing the kits, the regulatory agency said. In response, the CDC turned to an outside contractor to manufacture the remaining kits it had intended to make for public health labs.
– washingtonpost.com (April 18, 2020)
So much for “The FDA is the gold standard of regulators” that Bill Gates has touted earlier this year, if even the CDC is not adhering to these “regulations”. Of course, since Bill Gates has made this statement, he has, in recent months, retracted it…
And think all of these accounts were one-offs and that fully fixed batches were sent out the next time around?
Well, guess again.
Which brings me to:
2. More Faulty Tests from Many Different Sources
I’m not sure how many people know by now about Elon Musk’s test results from the antigen covid test, in which he allegedly tested 4 times in one day, half showing a positive result, the other half negative:
Mr. Musk is not the only one.
Others have stepped forward to announce their strange occurrences with the covid tests and results. Not to mention the many people who were trying to alert people to their experience that they did not even submit the test, and received a letter back or a call saying that they tested positive for covid. Including a woman who died in February and allegedly got tested in June.
Some reasons have been attributed to clerical errors, or testing of those who have donated their body to science in conjunction with missteps in regulations, misinformation, etc. No one (in authority) wants to flat out admit that these people are honestly just telling the truth and relating their experiences about this strange dilemma occurring all over the world.
It’s easy for “authority” figures to dismiss claims coming from “normal” citizens.
But when there’s a prominent figure making these claims, one who allegedly has inside knowledge about certain business industries and has millions of followers, subscribers, etc., the refutations of multiple “news outlets” are harder to take hold.
Another celebrity claims that the conflicting results she received came from each side of her nostril:
A third test revealed a negative. Which, obviously, begs the questions… if she took yet another test, would that come back negative again, or a positive? Did they duplicate the test results from each side of her nostril? Would that have made any effect on the outcome of the results? I suppose it’s too late to know now. Although I would think a real scientist and medical health professional would want to know the answer to all these questions and why these tests are presenting with such unreliable information in the first place.
Animals and Inanimate Objects Testing Positive for Covid
And it’d be one thing if all these tests had some semblance of normalcy in its testing processes… Yet, perhaps because I am not a scientist and am not familiar with how molecular biology works in conjunction with reagents and viruses and all those fancy scientific doodads and such, that it boggles my mind how even different types of substances can test positive for covid. Such as the pawpaw fruit, goat and engine oil that the Tanzanian president sent in for testing to, ironically, test the test results.
– Pawpaw, bird, goat, engine oil test positive for coronavirus (May 8, 2020)
Some have accused him of not taking the situation seriously, but no. He was doing what any wise person in his position should do to protect the integrity and honesty of the test themselves before submitting it to the rest of his country. It would have been interesting if he also sent in tests that were merely opened, and then sent in as if it had already taken a sample, to see what the results would have been.
Coca-Cola Tests Positive for Covid (live in front of other officials)
There is also a test recently performed by FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz in which he demonstrated live, in front of several peers, a can of cola testing positive for covid.
– Watch: Austrian MP Tests Cola for Covid-19 – Yields Positive Result (December 11, 2020)
So with all of these different accounts of multiple different tests ranging from things like engine oil, to fruit and carbonated drinks, to different types of animals, bringing back an alleged positive covid result, it should not be lost on others how many different ways the number of cases can skyrocket with the apparent either faulty results in these tests, and/or the hyper-sensitivity of them, or even the possibility that they are still cross-contaminated.
And, again in theory-like fashion, if one were to surmise that there is an agenda to boost the number of positive cases of this disease, one easy way to do this would be to simply dip a whole bunch of swabs in coke and let the positive results roll in.
Hypothetically, of course.
3. Creator of the PCR tests Refutes its Reliability to Determine if You a Have a Virus
Now, that brings us to the PCR test itself that several different authorities state is THE test to determine a positive result of covid (or just about anything, according to the PCR test creator).
From: NOT the Creator of the PCR test
Hence, the rapid tests are not as accurate and reliable as the gold-standard RT-PCR tests. As we explained in a previous column, tests are assessed based on their sensitivity and specificity. The more sensitive and specific a test is, the more accurate and reliable it is.– COVID-19 rapid tests, gold-standard tests—expert clarifies misinformation (April 7, 2020)
(Jessica) Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.”– COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless (June 27, 2020)
Stating that the antigen test is only done in emergency cases, he (Dr. Bhattacharya) said that he is not a fan of antigen tests and ultimately it is the RT-PCR test which is the gold standard and gives a confirmed result.– RT-PCR: The gold standard for COVID-19 testing (December 10, 2020)
These are just a tiny amount of officials who have declared the PCR test as being the ‘gold-standard’. There are many more.
From: The Creator (Kary Mullis) of the PCR test
However, as we can see in the below video from the creator himself, he states what the PCR can and does do, and by the sounds of it, it doesn’t seem like even the creator himself would suggest this test as a means to accurately detect a viral infection. In fact, he’s basically stating the exact opposite, that to use this test to detect a virus would be fundamentally flawed, because the test could detect anything out of anyone if you “amplify” it enough.
Some highlights from this 3 and a half minute long video, are the following quotes:
“If they can find this virus (talking about HIV, specifically in this video) in you at all, the PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody, it starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else.”
– Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)
“If you can amplify one single molecule, up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body.”– Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)
“PCR … it’s just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. …it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
– Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test (youtube.com)
All of this information is from just one video. A very short clip of it, I might add.
Kary Mullis’s Opinion of Anthony Fauci
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything, really, about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you could take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there, you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine, he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to and they smugly, like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”– Transcript courtesy of Dan Gano (youtube.com)
Now, even with the suspicions about Anthony Fauci and his ties to certain figures and their agenda, it is still interesting to note that even Fauci admits to the PCR test being basically fruitless to determine an accurate covid result, at least according to the FDA guidelines.
“As reported by Jon Rappaport, during a July 16, 2020, “This Week in Virology” podcast, Anthony Fauci made a point of saying that the industry-standard PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run using the threshold standards recommended by the FDA”– Anthony Fauci Admits Chances Of Getting Accurate Results From COVID PCR Tests Are ‘Miniscule’ (November 11, 2020)
Of course, Anthony Fauci’s admission about the PCR test being possibly useless if using the FDA guideline could trace back to a suspicion that Kary Mullis’s testimonies might get released and Fauci wanted to protect himself and cover his bases that he already knew that the PCR test could be an inaccurate source of true positive results. But was it covered widely on mainstream media?
The below link is another article that describes the inaccuracies of the PCR tests and the outrageous efforts of unlawful governmental control over quarantining tourists suspected of having covid (and the subsequent silence from the MSM) :
Kary Mullis, creator of the widely mis-used PCR test, died on August 7, 2019 of “pneumonia”.
And then, a little over 2 months later, on October 18, 2019, Event 201 was held by several high-profile figures to simulate a wide-spread pandemic exercise to demonstrate how a virus of such magnitude would effect global and economic situations.
“It (PCR) allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important.”
– Kary Mullis (creator of the PCR test that is being used to determine covid results)
I’m a huge proponent for people doing their own research. Please don’t just take my word for anything, or that of any others. Use critical thinking and discernment on top of looking at things with an open mind and keep researching and looking. Put the pieces together and maybe you’ll see a bigger picture starting to form.
Stay informed, and spread awareness. It may seem like an uphill battle but I believe we have more perseverance than we realize. Stay strong.
Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.
Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.