Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines

Proof with patents/documents and lab results shows that graphene oxide is in the vaccine.

Researching this subject of course brings up several “fact-checking” websites set on debunking this claim; however, as educated individuals have found out, these fact-checking websites serve one main purpose – and that is to perpetuate only one side of the narrative, even if they’re WRONG.

So instead of me attempting to fact-check the fact-checkers or debunk the doctors/scientists – which I know I can’t do since I am not adept in their fields, my sole purpose in this post is to point out what these doctors/scientists ARE saying and let people decide for themselves what may be the truth.

Of course, the truth is the truth and nothing can change that, but with so much misinformation and misleading content running rampant in today’s world, it’s crucial to scrutinize all of the information and discern the truth from the lies.

The following quotes/transcripts offered here allege to have found a substantially dangerous amount of graphene oxide in several different vaccines. And some speculation as to why these same companies are insisting that just one shot, two shots, booster shots, etc., may not be enough.

(…Again, I’m not a scientist. But what would multiple doses of large graphene oxide amounts do in the human body, especially if it is administered several times per year?… Another haunting question, why have there been graphene oxide found in masks and test swabs as well?)

Graphene Oxide in Jabs, Masks and Swabs

La Quinta Columna discovers large amount of graphene oxide in the vaccination

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Ricardo Delgado @3:43: “Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?”

José Javier Esparza: “The entire COVID disease. And then you, who already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.”

Ricardo Delgado @5:51: ” – because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of 500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha, etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada. You all know that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: if the masks were removed because they caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced into the vial? Moreover, in a considerable amount.

What we have found there, according to what the university that has done this study says, is that the main component is precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something else, but above all it is graphene oxide. And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide.”

Ricardo Delgado @7:36: “It seems that the body has a certain capacity to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain immunological mechanisms. Once inside the body it acts as if it were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione. So that is why, we probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a third dose. Now intranasally. They are already talking about new intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more potent.”

Ricardo Delgado @11:53: “98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide.”

Former Pfizer employee CONFIRMS La Quinta Columna’s findings of graphene oxide in the vaccines

(Some excerpts with corresponding timestamps and embellishment added for emphasis):

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?

Karen Kingston:100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston:I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Karen Kingston @4:58:They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston:Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.

So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized. You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Karen Kingston @11:47: ” – there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team finds graphene oxide in the vaccines

There is also further confirmation of Ricardo Delgado’s findings from Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team, showing similar research results and investigations of graphene oxide in the vaccines.

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / Andreas Kalcker’s team confirms evidence of graphene oxide in ‘vaccines’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Dr. Isignares @00:12: “For example, there is an issue that concerns us a lot because we had already detected certain things in the vaccines. And that’s that these vaccines contain graphene oxide. It’s been verified by electronic microscopy by someone from our team. The question is: why is there graphene?”

Dr. Andreas Kalcker: “To make it crystal clear. What varies is the biological composition of the vaccines. What doesn’t change in any of them, and that’s in all of them, are the crystals that are present in different amounts. They’re present in all the vials. There is both the magnetite, which has a Chinese patent, by the way. It’s patented. You can see… It’s not magnetite. It’s graphene.

Dr. Andreas Kalcker @1:51: “What happens then? The body needs its electromolecular capabilities to work. The heart beats because there’s a magnetic field that creates, subsequently, the electricity for pumping and everything else. And, therefore, what graphene is doing is that it’s completely altering our electromagnetic field. Something that has never happened before. And, let’s say, what we’re seeing is something ‘in vivo’ with some dramatic effects.

To understand more, we have also been watching a lot of videos of people who are dying after being vaccinated. There’re others where you see people spasming. These spasms have, for example, very specific frequencies, and they are, basically the same in all kinds of spasms. These spasms, clearly indicate that there is a disruption of the human electromagnetic fields.”

Research and studies proving that graphene oxide is being attempted to use in vaccines

It’s almost humorous that all of these fact-checking websites are refusing to acknowledge that there might be large amounts of graphene oxide in these vaccines, although the doctors/scientists above have allegedly found evidence that it does, and there are also some published studies that might suggest that graphene oxide will be used in vaccines as well. (please let me know if any of the links are no longer working)

An article on pubmed published the following research in 2016:
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

“Our work not only presents a novel, highly effective GO-based vaccine nano-adjuvant, but also highlights the critical roles of surface chemistry for the rational design of nano-adjuvants.”

Another article on pubmed published this research in 2018:
Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

“These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system.”


The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.”

And yet another article from pubmed published in 2020:
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant

“Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.”

“Keywords: Adjuvant delivery; Antigen delivery; Functionalized-GO; Immune adjuvant; Vaccine adjuvant; Vaccine nano-carrier.”

There is also this study showing how graphene oxide can inhibit certain responses, such as anxiety, fear, etc. (which, just theorizing, may perhaps take away someone’s natural instinct to perceive danger or threats…) when injected into certain parts of the brain. (Which also begs the question… what happens when this material gets injected into other parts of the brain…)

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Of course the title of the link downplays the implications that this graphene oxide can cause – which seems to be a manipulative tactic that people employ to try and convince others of the benefits of a potentially dangerous substance and/or decision. And while on the surface drugs and medicines may have advantageous effects, we can’t overlook the possibility that others may use the same drugs and medicines/procedures/gene therapy, etc. and twist it to fit their own purposes.

From the same link:

“Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Now I propose a theory of my own: In the near future, the same fact-checking writers/articles that were “debunking” all of the ‘graphene oxide in vaccines research’ will state something to the effect of: “Even though there is graphene oxide in the vaccines, there’s no reason for alarm” and/or “The graphene oxide material found in vaccines are not large enough to cause harm”, etc., etc., until the headlines change once again to state, “Why too much graphene oxide in your system is detrimental to your health” and “Further booster shots will not contain graphene oxide due to its dangers”.

Only time will tell…

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and all those exposing this egregious corruption.
And a special thank you to Orwell City for translating and transcribing the videos with Ricardo Delgado and Andreas Kalcker & team.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by seagul from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Does the PCR Test Affect the Pineal Gland? Humans and “Transhumans”. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger - "- vaccinating has nothing to do with protecting human health, but all to do with subjugating humanity to a bioweapon"
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Does the PCR Test Affect the Pineal Gland? Humans and “Transhumans”. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger - "- vaccinating has nothing to do with protecting human health, but all to do with subjugating humanity to a bioweapon"
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.

Whistleblowers Exposing the Coronavirus/Vaccine Narrative

Brave individuals speaking out to expose this fraudulent activity.

I have to admit, it is EXHAUSTING trying to show people that this whole coronavirus stunt is NOT what they think it is, and there is a different agenda altogether for initiating it. People are still wrapped up in what the media presents, none the wiser, and trusting the corrupt organizations that have set this system in motion.

It’s been over a year since the “covid pandemic” started, and if one hasn’t done their research and looked outside of the lying msm, and through the coronavirus “guidelines” and protocols – and through the inane decisions and contradicting/nonsensical regulations, then they will be blind and gullible to the very obvious deception that the C.T.s have been aware of a long time ago.

(C.T. – Critical Thinker)

Yes, the media will try to manipulate and gaslight you, call you a “Conspiracy Theorist”, try to make you feel shameful and ridiculous for believing in these “baseless” speculations. And you know what? It works. People are so afraid of being name-called, that they parrot what they hear from the msm and the paid-out/complicit “experts” and shut everything else out.

However, for those who are confident in their own thoughts, confident in their own identity, confident in their ability to see through b.s., and they don’t care about the childish name-calling and instead, if they have integrity, begin to question the narrative and call it out for the absurd power grab that it is.

Courageous souls step forward

The following people have come forward to tell their accounts, to tell their insights and experiences as to what may be going on with the coronavirus situation.

I urge and recommend you to do your own research as well. I present the following links for you to try and fit the pieces together to find out what the truth of the matter is. Do you want to remain lost in the fake narratives that have been created for the sole purpose of fooling us all? Or do you want to finally wake up and realize that there are multiple things that we are not being told, and it is painting a sordid, twisted agenda that people are starting to finally realize may be a possibility – as much as it’s terrifying to admit?

The following people are breaking out of the fake narrative and exposing the reality of what we may be dealing with.

“They’re writing ‘covid’ on all the death certificates.”

Project Veritas did an exposé back in April of LAST YEAR (2020) revealing that a funeral home director, Michael Lanza, was admitting that their administration were encouraging (demanding?) the appropriate industries to label deaths as covid, despite the true cause of death.

“To be honest with you, all of the death certificates are writing COVID on it, they’re writing
COVID on all the death certificates
,” Lanza said.

Lanza said DeBlasio might see inflated COVID death tallies as a way to bring more money to New York City. “Whether they had a positive test or didn’t, so I think again this is my
personal opinion, I think like the mayor and our city–they’re looking for federal funding and the more they put COVID on the death certificate the more they can ask from the federal funds.”

Source: BREAKING: Funeral Directors in COVID-19 Epicenter Doubt Legitimacy of Deaths Attributed to Pandemic, Fear Numbers are ‘Padded’

Even Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator during the time that the Project Veritas video came out, admitted that the protocol was to label deaths “with” covid as a covid death – thus inflating the covid death rate.

I remember the below video very specifically because at the time, this video was EVERYWHERE. Now, it’s been heavily scrubbed off of the internet, although you can still find it when searching for it. However, the keynote here is, usually youtube would be the first to recommend a video when trying to find a particular search word or phrase. Now? Well, take a look (we’re looking for a video of Deborah Birx in a pink scarf, and from youtube – see any?):

Out of the 36 top results, searching “deborah birx counting deaths with covid” on duckduckgo, there are only two results that depict Deborah Birx in the pink scarf from the mentioned video, one from realclearpolitics.com, and the other from the New York Post. None from youtube. Is there a reason why youtube would shadowban this video in particular? Is it “false information”? What’s the REAL reason that youtube would try to hide/delete videos containing this information?

Here is the video clip in question, originally posted at realclearpolitics:

Transcript (embellishment added for emphasis):

Reporter: “Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported, uh, by coronavirus, because of either testing or standards for how they’re characterized?”

Deborah Birx: “So I think in this country, we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality… and I think the reporting here has been pretty straightforward over the last 5 to 6 weeks.

Prior to that, when there wasn’t testing in January and February, that’s a very different situation, and unknown. There are other countries that if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU, and then have a heart or kidney problem, some countries are recording that as a heart issue, or a kidney issue, and not a covid-19 death.

Um, right now, we’re still recording it, and we’ll – and the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to mark it as covid-19 infection – the intent is right now, that those, if someone dies with covid-19, we are counting that, as a covid-19 death.

(Deborah Birx slowly walks offscreen as the reporter addresses this answer.)

Reporter: “Are you, can you be sure – I mean, you hear from coroners that that’s not necessarily the case, or – are, are you sure, how can you be so confident about that? And is there any concern that it’s used…”

(Feed/video trails off before the reporter can finish her question. I have not been able to verify the full length of this video at this time.)

Scientists expose PCR tests

Speaking of the “testing” that Deborah Birx mentioned, how is that going, I wonder? Surely there’s nothing shady about the PCR test or anything, that could possibly lend to more fake covid cases, right?

A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

Yes, ladies and gentlemen. This world widespread test, which has been, in large part, a key determinant in keeping this farce going, has been falsely ramping up coronavirus cases when in reality, the tests have been found to detect minuscule (harmless) amounts of a “virus”, especially when cycled through to thresholds of 35-40 (“or however many cycles it needs” – as was the fda guideline at the time) and it presents as a false positive as much as up to 97% of the time.

The Trouble With PCR Tests
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.

Scientists and researchers have been mentioning non-stop that a cycle of 35-40 is way too high to run these tests, and even Anthony Fauci himself admitted in July 2020 that a threshold this high would likely return misleading positive cases.

Kary Mullis, the very inventor of the PCR test, described the fallacy of using the pcr test to detect a virus – reiterating that it is not to be used for that reason. Why? Because as he stated, if you run the test at a high enough cycle, you can find almost anything in anybody. (coronavirus, anyone?) On a related note, he also said some revealing things about “Mr. Dr. Expert Anthony Fauci”…

I have written this before on my post Anthony Fauci Caught ‘Lying’ – Several Times (which I recommend for additional reading about the “expert” who has been the talking head of this suspicious circumstance) but it bears worth repeating:

Kary Mullis on Fauci:

“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything, really, about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing.

“He should not be in the position like he’s in.“

“Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

“President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…“

Source: You can watch the full interview of Kary Mullis with Gary Null here: Gary Null May 1996 interview of Kary Mullis: FULL

So why has this not been addressed for so long?! How long were labs running these tests at this high of a threshold? Is it any wonder the coronavirus cases were going up at an incredibly exponential rate? Especially with the constant pressure to get tested regularly, with some businesses expecting their employees to test twice a week?

Unreal.

But that’s not the end of it.

Because now due to the covid vaccine being rolled out everywhere, guess how many cycles are now suggested for testing covid vaccinated individuals ONLY?

CDC: maximum 28 CT for post-vaccine COVID PCR tests
Horowitz: CDC issues guidance for evaluating post-vaccination COVID tests at a lower standard

This is an egregious abuse and overstep of their authority and power. So because a person is vaccinated, now all of a sudden they want to change their covid tests to a lowered cycle of 28 – but yet keep it the same for everybody else who hasn’t been vaccinated? Does anyone else see a conflict of interest here? Making it seem as if the vaccine is suddenly a miracle-worker and voila! Even if they present symptoms of covid – it comes back negative. It must be the simple flu back, after a year long mysterious hiatus.

But behold the poor folks who didn’t get the vaccine. Their pcr test cycles are still set to over 35 cycles… tough luck. Guess the un-vaccinated will be more likely to get a (false) positive result of covid.

…Do I have to spell it out here? It is an obvious ploy to make it seem like the vaccine is working and is diminishing the coronavirus cases. Thus those who are left un-vaccinated will be seen as the remaining perpetrators of keeping the coronavirus alive.

I am almost at a loss to conceive how people do not see anything wrong with this deceptive, implemented system.

Nurses / doctors speak out

There are so many nurses/doctors stepping forward and revealing what they’ve witnessed, and while it is hard to determine the veracity of their experiences, eye-witness accounts have been used in courts as viable sources of information. It is also important in science/analysis to gather as much data as possible, even if it may be anecdotal, to study the topic further.

Here are some nurses/doctors (a small few, out of many) telling of their experiences during the coronavirus crisis:

Shelley Tasker speaks out against lying industry

Source: BRAVE Healthcare Worker Resigns Publicly – Shelley Tasker Resignation Speech

Shelley Tasker shares some truth bombs, and this video provides additional ones as well. Very insightful and sheds some interesting light on the matter.

Upset nurse in Brazil

Although I don’t understand the language that this lady is speaking, the message could not be any clearer.

She is walking through a completely empty facility, her voice echoing, reverberating throughout the large building, and showing an absolute ghost town. It is unclear when this video was made, but the various uploads I’ve seen show a date of May 5, 2021.

Erin Olszewski goes undercover

Source: Perspectives on the Pandemic – Episode 9 – The Undercover Epicenter Nurse – A Conversation with Erin Marie Olszewski

Erin Olszewski came out in early June of 2020, after recording her experience at Elmhurst hospital, exposing the amount of malpractice and corruption within those walls. Of course, there have been backlash against her testimonies, and far be it for me to assume it’s because she was single-handedly dismantling the covid-crisis at this hospital and exposing it for the insidious depravity that she saw – threatening to ruin the reputation of this establishment. And coincidentally enough, it was the “epicenter” of the coronavirus cases, and by listening to Erin Olszewski’s accounts, we can see why…

Her testimony lines up with everything else that the government/medical/health institutions have implemented, and we would be blind not to see it. (Of course, sadly, people are still blind to this fact…)

(NOTE: This is another video that has been widely scrubbed off of youtube.)

Doctors around the world fighting against the false narrative

Source: Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

I made a post in early December transcribing the video “Ask the Experts” that has been banned from multiple different platforms. Because of its importance and essential insights from multiple different experts in the health/medical/scientific field, I felt it necessary to add it here again. The video contains 33 different testimonies and researched opinions from those who are not just following the administrative protocol to vouch for these highly suspect vaccines. Please give it a watch and a listen because these are the individuals who care about your well-being – not the “yes-people” just following orders from their management/supervisors.

Bless these people for fighting against the narrative and trying to get the rest of the public to open their eyes.

To read the full transcript, please go here: Ask The Experts (Covid-19 Vaccine) – Now Banned on YouTube and Facebook

Nurse speaks out against the corrupt government

Source: Whistleblower Nurse Speaks Out Against The Corrupt Government & NHS

At what appears to be a protest, a nurse takes the stand and explains that this coronavirus situation is not what the media portrays, and she is speaking out to urge other nurses to step forward and do the right thing. Expose this corruption, expose this governmental/political plot, and do right by your fellow human being.

These nurses are brave, caring individuals who are tired of seeing this manipulative system and their honest feedback is desperately needed in these deceptive times.

I have already read the (gasp!) conspiracy theories… that some of these medical health members may be actors. But when you think about it, that’s kind of funny coming from people who believe the msm doesn’t employ false flag actors in their little dramatic reports… but I digress. If these doctors/nurses are actors, then they do a much better job than what the msm hires. Maybe the msm should take a lesson in watching them.

Or, we can give these whistleblowers the benefit of the doubt, and contemplate on what’s in it for them. Sure Erin Olszewski wrote a book about her experience at the New York hospital, which would give her incentive in exposing these heinous activities at that certain hospital (though it’s hubris of us to judge someone’s character based off of speculation of their motive anyway), but others have also risked their career and reputation to try and tell us the truth. They did it out of the sincerity of their conscience, and their compassion for humankind.

Can we say the same about the majority of the people pressuring others to take an unneeded and dubious vaccine? Even pressuring pregnant women and young children/older vulnerable people to take it? Especially given all the evidence that these coronavirus cases are highly exaggerated as it is, I’d say there’s a suspicious agenda in trying to bribe and manipulate/coerce people to take it. Not that these people are doing it from the goodness of their hearts.

Speaking of…

Influencers offered money to promote vaccines

Isn’t it funny how there’s a whole profession called “influencer” in social media? Has anyone really taken a step back and pondered on the meaning of this word?

Well, enter in this huge vaccine push to get the whole world jabbed with this mysterious chemical concoction, with no long-term efficacy or safety data, for a disease with a 99.97% survival rate for anyone without underlying conditions and under a certain age/weight (the average healthy and young/middle age John and Jane Doe) – and influencers, and what do you get?

People getting offered a payment in order to influence their followers into getting the vaccine.

Sure seems like that because the vaccine cannot legally be advertised – since it is NOT FDA approved, only authorized for emergency use only (which doctors and nurses around the world are contesting that we have not, nor have ever been, in an “emergency” with the covid situation – despite what the deceiving media and industries would have you believe – although by the time this suspect vaccine has done it’s damage, is probably when the real emergency is going to roll around…) then they have decided to workaround the legality of this issue and employ influencers and politicians/celebrities to do their work for them to convince the public to get the vaccine.

Pretty shady, if you ask me.

THANKFULLY, there are a few sane and coherent (and also caring and honest) influencers around that are exposing this disreputable practice for what it really is.

Whitney Rife

Source: Instagram influencer paid to promote vaccine -Apr 15 2021

“Not looking to debate or anything, but I’ve just seen, obviously the vaccine tab, and, to each their own, if you want to get the vaccine, get the vaccine, to each your own.

BUT! I did just want to make a little note, that I received 2 vaccine campaigns, paying thousands of dollars to go and get a vaccine – or go get the vaccine, and record it and take a selfie while getting the vaccine.

Just going to throw that out there.”Whitney Rife (because I appreciate her honesty so much, here is a link to her website: whitneyrife.com)

Allie May (Proverbs31girl)

Source: HOW THEY RECRUIT “VACCINE INFLUENCERS” HAVE YOU SOLD YOUR SOUL YET?

Transcript:

“And, it’s a little nerve-wrecking, because I am not meaning to step on anyone’s toes, and I’m not judging any decisions, but I wanted to be transparent, because I feel like there’s only one narrative really being pushed right now in the world… and it’s not for everyone. It’s just scary to go against the narrative a lot of times.

So, why not be my account? (laughs nervously) Um, but I wanted to tell you, that you know, I get like multiple collaborations everyday and I know that I need to, like, scale back – I just love working with these brands. Like, I only pick the ones I really am excited about.

But anyhow, I got this collaboration, this past week, and I’m just going to put it up here because no one is talking about it. But they are paying people to do this, and I’m not even going to say it, I’m just going to post it.”

“Okay, again, I want it to be known that your choice is your choice. And everyone can have different opinions and ideas, but in the end I would just think it would be amazing if we could all respect each other’s choices.

And, just knowing, that they had a billion dollars in the stimulus to use to advertise to get this is just was a big red flag for me. And to know that they are paying people that you trust and love… um, it’s… it just doesn’t sit right. For something that is going into you, that, you know, we don’t know the effects.

And so, I just wanted you to be aware that as you are seeing this message, displayed, from large corporations, from little tiny influencers, to big influencers, that there is a money trail behind it. And you need to be aware of that.

Okay, and I’m kind of shaking right now. Which is sad that I have to feel like afraid to even talk about this. Um, right? But, I just know that there is a megaphone on one voice, and there’s a megaphone on ONLY one voice, so if I could just do a tiny little… to allow people to see behind the scenes, ’cause I don’t think everyone even really truly understands what’s, you know, how, how this is going down. Um, then I guess I’m willing to take that risk, because this isn’t something to mess around with.”Allie May (Proverbs31girl)

Thank you to Allie May and Whitney Rife and anyone else who has been exposing this manipulative and untrustworthy tactic. Your honesty and integrity is greatly appreciated!

And so if it comes out that these vaccines really are harmful… can people hold the influencers/celebrities/politicians/etc., who have promoted the vaccine as safe and effective, liable and sue them for misinformation and giving out medical advice when they’re not a doctor? Can the public, since the vaccine companies aren’t responsible for any side-effects you get from their vaccine, sue the government, their employer, etc., etc. if these vaccines are proven unsafe? What are the legal ramifications of this case? Would everyone just be free of liability since, at the time, the vaccine was approved for “emergency use authorization” only?

I would definitely think about the ramifications of these incidences before injecting this highly suspicious mixture into your body. I am not straight up telling anyone NOT to get the vaccine, although my inclination is to just for your own safety, because in my opinion, this vaccine is far more dangerous than what they are labeling as “covid”. But I AM telling you to be informed and do research and fit all these different pieces together before you do so, if you decide to at all.

Michael Yeadon, former scientific researcher and Vice President at Pfizer

Michael Yeadon has opened up a can of worms and a smear campaign in his name.

Is it any wonder? With a background like his, and the knowledge and experience he brings to the table, tptsb are probably scrambling to bring his reputation down and quash any credibility that he has. Just a quick, cursory search of his name on google/duckduckgo presents top results of websites bashing his name and resorting to their usual name-calling rhetoric by labeling him as an “anti-vax” hero. Of course the title “hero” they use is sardonic – but to me, “hero” is quite fitting.

After all, it’s not everyday that a former Vice President of a huge, multi-billion dollar company comes out in the face of scrutiny and ridicule to go against the mainstream narrative and big tech/company conglomerates. No, most people of his stature would probably want to keep their reputation and protect the secrets they hold.

Not Michael Yeadon. He has the bravery and morally ethic fortitude to come out against this obvious attack on our rights and freedom, and exposes the corruption as he sees it, through his experienced and established knowledge. He KNOWS that there is a different agenda then what we’ve been told and led to believe. And he KNOWS that these vaccines and the coronavirus situation hold a darker goal that admittedly, is hard and terrifying to believe – but has ultimately come to the same conclusion that a lot of “critical thinkers” have proposed.

Being an expert in biotechnology, he is able to crunch the numbers and correlate all of the necessary data to realize that the information we’ve been presented with has been skewed, twisted, and manipulated to suit the agenda that the global elitists have planned for their own purpose. He gets technical in his post and eventually comes to the realization that we’ve all been lied to.

Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives

Keep in mind, this is just his data on the coronavirus tests and the suspicious nature of how they’ve been counting covid deaths, especially compared to other illnesses such as the regular flu, influenza, other respiratory illnesses… And this hasn’t even covered his analysis on what the vaccines are for…

Source: Michael Yeadon | Full Interview | Planet Lockdown

This is an extremely important video. While people may laugh and scoff at the “conspiracy theorists” – who honestly most are just ordinary people who can see through this deception and are worried and concerned for everyone else’s safety – Michael Yeadon is not someone to easily dismiss. For him to admit that his suspicions have finally led him to believe that this mass-vaccination effort is to curb the population (in not so subtle terms – kill off masses of people in what would most likely be the worst genocide in history) suddenly thrusts this possibility into the realm of serious contemplation.

I, as well as a multitude of people, have already tried explaining this possibility to those who would hear it – and those who don’t want to, because it is such an important facet of our lives. Those who can look beyond the laughs and scorn can see the connection between Bill Gates’ depopulation efforts, see Anthony Fauci for the “yes-man” he is, make the connection between REAL organizations who have been planning this curb of the population for a very long time – and yes, admitting that vaccines would be a good way to do it.

The whole video is a gem and definitely worth watching, but I am going to just highlight one, extremely relevant quote from Michael Yeadon @ the 45:40 mark,

“This system is being put in place, using lies, and it’s being put in place using lies for some purpose, and I believe that purpose is complete, totalitarian control. And I think the purpose of that, is going to be mass depopulation.”

Again, the whole video is well worth the watch. And just keep this in mind that it’s not just “crazy, delusional” people that are coming to this conclusion. When one looks at all of the evidence, this is the one conclusion that makes the most sense. It’s literally been talked about for centuries and quite possibly has been going on for centuries – just on a smaller scale through manufactured wars and other governmental/scientific “experiments” and who knows what else they do under “national security”.

As Michael Yeadon says, right before the quote I mentioned, “Simply think.

Sidenote:

I cannot make myself any clearer when I say, from the bottom of my heart, DO NOT TRUST FACT-CHECKING WEBSITES!!!!

They are EMPLOYED by the very same people pushing this false narrative and unnecessary lockdown procedures on everyone. Of course the “fact-checkers” are going to find everything in favor of their lord and masters (aka: their paycheck signers). Please keep this in mind, and DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

Stopping at snopes.com to see that the headline in question has been “debunked” is NOT RESEARCH.

Glancing at the top search results on google/duckduckgo that are most likely “fact-checking” sites that say, “No, of course Bill Gates didn’t say that depopulation was his goal.” is NOT RESEARCH.

Asking your friends what they think of such and such “conspiracy” is NOT RESEARCH.

Trusting that a corrupt industry is denying any wrongdoing is NOT RESEARCH. (‘Oh yes, we had an internal audit and everything is tip-top, kosher. Nothing to see here, folks.‘ – Of course they’re not going to admit to committing underhanded/sinister schemes!)

So who has incentive to lie here? All of these people I’ve shown above – risking their own reputation and their own livelihood to try and get the truth out? Revealing the strange abnormalities and suspicious circumstances they’ve seen? Or the multiple institutions that are getting paid millions/billions of dollars in order to keep this narrative alive? For perhaps the sole purpose of getting as many people as possible to take this dubious “covid vaccine”?

If truth be told, it is OUTRAGEOUS to even consider that there is a sinister plot unfolding before our very eyes. It seems too inconceivable, too outlandish – too wild to even contemplate. These kinds of things only happen in the movies. Who would believe something like this? That there is a worldwide initiative to dictate humanity to following a single, one world directive…? How could anyone believe that there are so many people involved in this agenda?

I. Don’t. Blame. Them.

I wouldn’t want to believe this is possible either. But if we can set aside our fear and denial, our refusal to think that a huge, global conspiratorial plan to control (and curb) the population could be possible, then perhaps we can finally come together and bring awareness to these heinous goals, and start standing up for our rights and protecting our future. We have to realize, no matter what we WANT to believe, the fact of the matter is that there is something completely different than what we are told.

The mainstream media has been under the control of certain factions for a very long time. Their whole goal is to manipulate what the public thinks, even twisting and creating scenarios to lead the population into certain belief systems. When one can finally think for themselves and step outside of this corrupted structure, and who have integrity and courage, then we have these brave, morally ethic truth speakers who are speaking out against these establishments. Telling their accounts, telling the truth about what they are seeing with their very own eyes.

Are we going to ignore all of them, just to feel comfortable in our own skin and lie to ourselves to sleep better at night? Refusing to believe that their testimonies are true and instead, continue to listen to paid off companies working to manipulate and deceive the public? Are we going to let the heartfelt honesty of caring and fed-up citizens go to waste, and trust in these immoral institutions instead?

Are we that lost and weak that we can’t face this reality?

I give these brave figures commendation and respect for having the integrity and fortitude for doing what’s right, especially in a time when telling the truth is being condemned and attacked by multiple platforms, news outlets and huge corporations – and in the same vein, being attacked by the masses who don’t know any better. They are a testament to how genuinely compassionate individuals can speak up and spread awareness, even if it means going against the grain of their very own career and, quite literally, everyone else.

Thank you to those who are exposing this corruption for what it is. You are so widely appreciated and respected and I admire you from the bottom of my heart. Thank you so much for your honesty and integrity.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Does the PCR Test Affect the Pineal Gland? Humans and “Transhumans”. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger - "- vaccinating has nothing to do with protecting human health, but all to do with subjugating humanity to a bioweapon"
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine ‘glows,’ contains toxic luciferase, graphene oxide compounds [Full Transcript] - " - it is a massive test on the world, and I believe it's a way for them to know who's vaccinated because their blood will glow."
Studies PROVE That Live Parasites and Parasite Proteins Are Being Used/Tested in Vaccines | Are Parasites the Cause of ALL Illnesses? - At least 650,000 - 800,000 CHILDREN have been injected with a malaria vaccine to test its efficacy.
Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates - Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.
The War on COVID-19: Man’s Final Conquest of Nature. The Great Reset Requires “Merging Humans with the Machine” - "Man's conquest of nature, if the dreams of some scientific planners are realized, means the rule of a few hundreds of men over billions upon billions of men."
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.