Combining Health/Medical/Biodata Together with Artificial Intelligence – For OUR Benefit? Or For a Different Reason Altogether?

A.I. technology has made significant advances. But what if it never stops advancing?

As I was researching an individual (who shall not be named to protect their anonymity) – I came across a rather… intriguing company that they had an interest in.

For a little background, this individual has been speculated as getting their really young son vaccinated, even before it was authorized in their area. For additional reference, it would seem that being involved in the NHS is also an important part of their repertoire – so perhaps they are of the UK region.

Again, these are more of a supposition based on their information, so please take it with a grain of salt.

Sadly, this individual lost their son not too long ago.

Now, just out of curiosity sakes (not to condemn, provoke, judge, or anything of the sort) I took an initiative to research their twitter page for additional information. What were their other interests/involvements? What makes this person a pro-vaccine advocate? Etc. This is where the information about the NHS comes from.

And in addition, there was another company listed that really took me aback. And that will be the focus of what this post is about.

The DEMON Network

“We are the international network for the application of data science and AI to dementia research. The Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON) Network brings together academics, clinicians and other partners from across the world. By connecting these people, we can identify innovative approaches to interdisciplinary collaborative dementia research across multiple institutions.

Our vision is to revolutionise dementia research and healthcare by bringing innovators together and harnessing the power of data science and AI.”

Source: [ https://demondementia.com/about/ ]

Further research into this group and the above individual’s interests revealed human genomes/genetics and deep brain integration with AI as additional fields of pursuit.

Very interesting.

And once again, just as the SATiN technology – I have to point out the incredibly unnecessary and non-sense acronym that they have decided to choose for their company.

“Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON)”?

It is quite obvious the allusion that they were going for.

Now, for the sake of playing Devil’s advocate (no pun intended), perhaps they only mean it as a reference that ‘dementia’ is such an awful disease and so they are calling dementia itself a “demon”, in the most figurative of sense. Or, one can construe it in the sense that some people have described the symptoms of dementia as that of someone being demonically possessed – the change in personality, the trembling/shaking, sudden aggression, etc. So perhaps their motive was to highlight this detail – as controversial as that would be.

However, under the assumption that anyone who has faith/belief in God/Jesus Christ, or even who believes in preserving humanity in our natural state, and who would not want to tamper with His creations in such a way as to genetically modify and/or merge us (or any other living being) with man-made technology, the rationale that the groups of people initiating this sort of invasive work would deliberately choose the acronym it did for more of a shock value than anything else, and to perhaps mock those who are against this sort of contentious work, would make more sense.

There is, of course, the darker side of the argument, and that’s that the founder(s) of something like DEMON Network, fully believe that they are serving a “demonic” agenda.

No one likes to contemplate on this subject. No one wants to believe that someone running a large organization in manipulating, modifying, genetically changing, hacking the software of life, collecting medical/biological/DNA information – could possibly be involved in such a thing as “demonic worship”, or idolizing machines – like artificial intelligence, for example – or would attempt to personify a computer learning algorithm/intelligence as a “beast system”.

Yet, when digging into transhumanism, technological advancements, the agendas of certain “philanthropic” billionaires and globalists, government agencies… one thing seems to tie them all together. And that is, indeed, a reset of humanity in some way, that involves merging us with machine.

This is NO SECRET, and has been admitted by everyone from Klaus Schwab, to Bill Gates, to Elon Musk, to Henry Kissinger (who was a professor of Klaus Schwab) to institutions such as DARPA.

Getting back to the DEMON Network, who has partnered with the UK Dementia Research Institute, I have selected a few short excerpts from an interview between David Llewellyn (founder of DEMON Network) and Bart De Strooper of the UK DRI that can be found at the following link: [ https://demondementia.com/podcast-using-ai-data-to-fight-dementia/ ] “Podcast: Using AI & data to fight dementia”

David Llewellyn: “We deliberately, I mean, it’s designed to encourage collaboration and new ideas, dangerous ideas, so we want people to join who don’t know anything about dementia. Maybe they know all about transfer learning, or other forms of machine learning, or artificial intelligence.”

Interviewer Megan O’Hare: “When we got given the topic for this podcast, thought to myself, I should probably actually, work out what artificial intelligence is. Obviously we use the word a lot, and you think of that Will Smith film, and – but, and so I had to look around and there’s the cheering test. Which is basically the test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behavior equivalent to or indistinguishable from that of a human.

But I wanted, because you’re both coming at it from different places, how you view A.I.? Um, to how you think it will impact dementia research? Maybe, David, we start with you?”

David Llewellyn: “Well, it’s a difficult thing to pin down. Because it obviously means different things to different people. But I think in its, in its broader sense, artificial intelligence is the idea that we’ll create machines that think for themselves, and they’re able to exhibit intelligent characteristics without, without us pulling levers; manually inputting and prodding and poking them into what they should be doing.

And the most ambitious form of artificial intelligence is a sort of creation of a new digital, sentient being, which will take over the world and enslave us.

And that’s the – that’s the thing that, that some people worry about. You know, the point at which machines don’t just match our performance, but start to exceed our performance. So that – that’s the, that is a fascinating and yet, and as yet unachieved ambition. That not everyone thinks we should be aiming for either.

I don’t think many people are arguing we’ve created a super-intelligent yet. But it’s possible. It’s possible.

Bart De Strooper: “These are the advances of molecule biology, and how it’s done at the moment is it’s very simplistic. We use a – we use a… […] I apologize to my colleagues – but we take a cell, we put a DNA in it, we express the protein, and then we see things happening, of course, and everything that’s biology. Of course! Biology’s much more complicated.

You need to – to, and that’s – so the next step in molecule biology was, if I’m boring you please interrupt me, but next step was the mouse stuff. When we changed the gene, and then we saw the whole thing change in the mouse.”

Bart De Strooper: “There will be a moment, and that’s also the vision of the DRI, there is a moment that most of the research will be in silico.

Bart De Strooper: “I think that in the 10 years, I foresee for me now, still going on, that’s – a lot of the classical biology will be replaced by, by this combination of silico prediction, and then tested. In 20 years, it’s probably going to be the classical biologists will be a rare species.

David Llewellyn: “Well if you listen to some people, artificial intelligence will make us all redundant.”

Image credited to: UK Dementia Research Institute

And as Dr. James Giordano so succinctly put it, when given funding from multiple different organizations, the possibility of “dual-use” medical/scientific interventions becomes an obvious motive.

Take a study/research that involves David Llewellyn and others on behalf of the European Task Force for Brain Health Services:

[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507172/ ] “Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services”

Some noteworthy possible Conflicts of Interest that could have influenced some of the research/funding/studies, etc. of such endeavors involves the following companies:

Source: [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507172/ ] “Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services”

AstraZeneca
BioCross
Biogen
Elan Pharmaceuticals
Genentech
Janssen
Lilly
Lundbeck
Novartis
Pfizer

Those are some extremely familiar names. Now why is this so important?

Well, aside from the very unusual name (DEMON Network) and their possible involvement/affiliations with the above listed organizations – imagine a company being able to provide a cure for such a debilitating illness – like dementia/Alzheimer’s for instance. In fact, imagine a complete cure for anything you can think of.

Cancer. The common cold. Heart attacks. Depression. Schizophrenia. ADHD. AIDS. So on and so forth.

Now ask yourself, what happens to these companies when the cure is established and no one is sick from anything anymore? Well, quite obviously, people won’t need on-going medicine/drugs/therapists/vaccines… etc., etc. Thus, putting the medical field largely out of a very lucrative business. As long as they can keep flourishing with an abundance of “sick” people, an actual CURE would destroy their whole entire foundation.

So from a strictly financial/business point of view, the medical field would be shooting themselves in the foot if they were to ever find such a beneficial treatment. The smart, yet extremely underhanded thing to do, would be to keep the falsehood going that they are treating you, while keeping you sick all the while to peddle drugs and even more treatments to “cure” additional ailments.

Now, am I necessarily saying that this is exactly what’s going on here? Well… there are many signs that certainly do point in that direction. But I am also of the belief that there are people in those institutions that don’t believe this, and who are, in fact, very honest and genuine people trying to help others with their illnesses. But it doesn’t mean that it’s not going on.

Perhaps even some in that field are becoming disillusioned with their very own profession/career and the suspicious activities that their organizations have engaged in. But one can’t help but wonder if this is the true motive of the medical institutions.

And again, it certainly does not help when they pair up with foundations named DEMON Network who are interested in implementing A.I. algorithms and tracking/monitoring human being’s physiology; under the false guise, in my opinion, of helping people.

Elon Musk makes an eerie reference

As mentioned earlier, Elon Musk, who is eager to start implementing his Neuralink implants into human beings next year (2022), has said this rather… interesting “hyperbole” about A.I.’s back in 2014:

Elon Musk: “And with artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. You know? You know all those stories where, there’s the guy with the pentagram and the holy water, and he’s like, yeah, he’s sure he can control the demon. [exaggerated winking]

It didn’t work out.

Sure this very well could have been strictly a metaphor, but in context of the individuals/organizations who truly are interested in A.I. technology, and the transhumanism efforts, and who also seem to have an uncanny alliance/affiliation with the Lucis Trust (formerly the Lucifer Trust), the supposition that it is all just a coincidence gets less and less certain.

Metabolic Machines and Demons of Life

In addition to all of that, are even more allusions to the “demonic” qualities that artificial intelligence/computing systems seem to possess. (again, no pun intended)

Thomas Feuerstein is an artist who focuses a lot on biotechnology and fuses biological organisms (algae, human cells) into his artwork. Again, with an interest in artificial intelligence as well, his take on what artificial intelligence is, coupled with his artwork, presents an even deeper meaning into a “demon network” that I don’t think many of us are aware of.

Take the following excerpts from Feuerstein’s presentation for consideration:

All quotes by Thomas Feuerstein:

“Data metabolic systems, I mean works that eat and […] digest data autonomously, and convert them into new data, always based on a software that I call “demon”.

In ancient Greece, the daemon was a translator between ideas and meta, gods and humans. And furthermore, a daemon or demon was a distributor of fate, of resources, goods and information.”

“To this day, the word “demon” hides in many common words, theories and concepts. For example, democracy comes from demos, which means people or nations. And “daemos” derives from daemon. In this sense, a daemon is a governor, a decision maker, and an allocator.”

“Demons today are not only fictional or mythical creatures in literature, religions, superstition, or pop culture. We find them also in science, technology, art, economics, and politics.

And as I said before, without demons there can be no governance, and no cybernetics.

Our daily lives are full of demons, and with the emergence of new technologies and A.I., cultural demons are becoming more and more relevant in a networked society. We find them in electronic devices, in the form of algorithmic trading, in biotechnology, surveillance technology – “

“The ancient concepts of demons we have to sink in new contexts. More and more demons become machines; biochemical and digital machines.”

“Another very strong demon, the Holy Spirit, enters not as a higher source any longer. It enhances the brain, digital and molecular. In future times maybe we are all enlightened people, speaking in tongues and glossolalia becomes a molecular and digital application in our brain.

For example, the company Neuralink, wants to implant brain computer interfaces – so called BCI, to connect the brain with the internet.

Ironically I can say in the future we may not only have artificial intelligence, we may have artificial identity.”

“Deep meaning reminds me of DeepDream from Google [editor’s note: who, unironically, removed the motto “Don’t be evil” from their code of conduct policy…], and shows that the genius is not a person with special abilities, but someone who is controlled by a higher intelligence and ruled like a puppet.”

” – Fernando Corbato and the science team at the MIT, wrote the computer program “daemon”. It was a simple backup program, and daemon was a backronym for a disk and execution monitor. And this is important, because it was the beginning of machines started to talk to themselves. It influenced all later programs from chat BOTS to search BOTS to viruses and artificial intelligence agents. And in this sense, the most mightful and greedy demon who haunts the internet today is the Google bot.”

“More and more demons take possession of our environment and connect us imperceptibly with networked processes. These demons lurk in smartphones and smart homes.”

“Another cosmist, Nikolai Federov, describes the machinist of the future as a place not for death, but for technical reanimated humans. This was science fiction at the time, but today where Google, Facebook […] are constantly collecting data, a digital reapers is approaching technical feasability.

Ironically I would say, we will end not in graves, we will end as demons in cyberspace.”

And like Thomas Feuerstein mentioned, the demon/daemon terminology to describe computer programs/artificial intelligence is an expression  – at least from a computer programmer/hacker’s point of view.

In The Original Hacker’s Dictionary, it describes daemon and demon as the following:

DAEMON (day’mun, dee’mun) [archaic form of “demon”, which has slightly different connotations (q.v.)] n. A program which is not invoked explicitly, but which lays dormant waiting for some condition(s) to occur. The idea is that the perpetrator of the condition need not be aware that a daemon is lurking (though often a program will commit an action only because it knows that it will implicitly invoke a daemon). For example, writing a file on the lpt spooler’s directory will invoke the spooling daemon, which prints the file. The advantage is that programs which want (in this example) files printed need not compete for access to the lpt. They simply enter their implicit requests and let the daemon decide what to do with them. Daemons are usually spawned automatically by the system, and may either live forever or be regenerated at intervals. Usage: DAEMON and DEMON (q.v.) are often used interchangeably, but seem to have distinct connotations. DAEMON was introduced to computing by CTSS people (who pronounced it dee’mon) and used it to refer to what is now called a DRAGON or PHANTOM (q.v.). The meaning and pronunciation have drifted, and we think this glossary reflects current usage.

DEMON (dee’mun) n. A portion of a program which is not invoked explicitly, but which lays dormant waiting for some condition(s) to occur. See DAEMON. The distinction is that demons are usually processes within a program, while daemons are usually programs running on an operating system. Demons are particularly common in AI programs. For example, a knowledge manipulation program might implement inference rules as demons. Whenever a new piece of knowledge was added, various demons would activate (which demons depends on the particular piece of data) and would create additional pieces of knowledge by applying their respective inference rules to the original piece. These new pieces could in turn activate more demons as the inferences filtered down through chains of logic. Meanwhile the main program could continue with whatever its primary task was.”

So now one has to wonder, are the agendas of the “DEMON Network” really to help those with dementia? Or, as Professor David Llewellyn implied himself, are they more interested in:

“Dr Megan O’Hare interviews Professor Bart De Strooper and Professor David Llewellyn, discussing the new UK Dementia Research Institute and DEMON Network partnership to unlock the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI).”?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Tayeb MEZAHDIA from Pixabay

CDC, FDA Prepare Mass Distribution of a Merck/Sanofi Six-in-One Vaccine for Kids, Turning Blind Eye to Safety Signals

Egregious oversteps endangering children’s lives.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The FDA approved Vaxelis in late 2018, but only now is the shot being readied for widespread distribution — in Europe, where infants have been given six-in-one vaccines for years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the vaccines have been associated with reports of sudden infant death.

Since the mid-1980s, the number of childhood shots on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule has more than quadrupled. When parents express reluctance about turning their little ones into perpetual pin cushions, drug makers and doctors have a ready answer — combination vaccines that “simplify” the schedule by decreasing the number of injections administered.

This month marks the U.S. launch of the Merck/Sanofi joint-venture vaccine, Vaxelis, a six-in-one (hexavalent) combination vaccine that contains diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) components as well as components said to protect against polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B.

Public health officials optimistically believe that bundling all of these components into one shot will help close noncompliance loopholes and increase the likelihood that children will complete “all recommended vaccinations.”

Though Vaxelis is the nation’s first hexavalent injection, it joins other four- or five-in-one vaccines already on the CDC schedule. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Vaxelis in late 2018 — as a three-dose series for 2-, 4- and 6-month-old infants — but it is only now, two-and-a-half years later, that the shot is being readied for widespread distribution.

Warning signs were ignored

There are numerous warning signs that potent all-in-one vaccines are too much for immature immune systems to handle. Concerning safety signals have emerged not just for hexavalent but also pentavalent (five-in-one) vaccines.

In Europe, where infants have been given hexavalent vaccines for some years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the formulations have produced many troubling reports of sudden infant death.

Absurdly, none of the clinical studies assessing Vaxelis safety and efficacy conducted fair comparisons against an inert placebo. Instead, in the two U.S. clinical trials for Vaxelis, not only did investigators compare infants receiving Vaxelis to babies who received Sanofi’s five-in-one Pentacel — but babies in both groups also received rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines at the same time!

In this context, the CDC’s sales pitch to the public — and its claims that side effects are “usually mild” — cannot be considered credible.

Here are some of the other facts missing from the CDC’s communications:

  • In the two U.S. trials six infants died (slide #27) in the Vaxelis group (some after receiving just one dose); one infant also died in the “control” group that received five-in-one vaccines.
  • All six Vaxelis recipients died within six weeks of vaccination. This timing matches other published accounts of infant deaths “clustering” following hexavalent vaccination.
  • The reported causes of death for the infants who received Vaxelis included asphyxia, sepsis, fluid in the brain and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). These outcomes correspond to the types of adverse events reported following hexavalent vaccination in Europe.
  • Package inserts for other vaccines on the CDC schedule list similar causes of death, suggesting these fatal Vaxelis outcomes are plausibly associated with vaccination.
  • In the clinical trials, the rate of fever was notably higher in Vaxelis recipients even when compared to children receiving five-in-one vaccines (47% vs. 34%).

Juicing vaccine sales

In the no-liability context enjoyed by vaccine makers in the U.S., combination vaccines are already quite popular. In fact, market watchers and health economists praise the jumbo shots as being a catalyst for positive industry trends and a “key to commercial success.”

 

Thus, financial analysts expect Vaxelis to “garner significant patient share following its [U.S.] launch” — predicting that it will account for almost a third of U.S. DTaP vaccinations by 2028 — or $841 million in annual sales.

These predictions represent good news for Merck and Sanofi, two of the “big four” pharma giants that dominate the childhood vaccine market in the United States. Merck is already doing a booming vaccine business, recently reporting annual sales growth of 14.8% for its pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax 23) and 5.4% for its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil-9.

However, Merck also faces proliferating Gardasil-related lawsuits — including legal actions alleging that the company knew about and ignored life-changing adverse events from the get-go, many of which (when not fatal) have involved autoimmunity and chronic pain. In fact, before the advent of emergency use COVID vaccines (responsible for an alarming escalation of vaccine-related adverse events), Gardasil had had “more side effects reported than all other vaccines combined.”

Sanofi, too, is embroiled in thousands of lawsuits worldwide — notably for its disastrous and sometimes fatal dengue vaccine. As with Merck, this has not dampened overall vaccine sales growth, which continues its strong upward trajectory, likely to be further strengthened by the U.S. Vaxelis rollout.

Although Sanofi has not been a front-runner in the COVID vaccine race, the company is currently running clinical trials for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines for both COVID and seasonal influenza.

Aluminum secrecy and grandfathered ingredients

Merck’s proprietary, “super-powered” aluminum adjuvant — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) — which is believed to play a significant role in Gardasil’s risk profile, is also present in Vaxelis.

After Merck developed AAHS, it began to “preferentially” feature AAHS in its vaccines even though, as Danish scientists outlined last year, the company appears to have disregarded procedures ordinarily required for approval of new adjuvants.

According to the Danes, at the time AAHS appeared, it represented a “new type of aluminium adjuvant with excipients that [had] not been used earlier in [European Medicines Agency] authorised vaccines.” It should have been — but apparently was not — tested against an inert placebo. For this and other reasons, the Danish scientists question the ethical underpinnings of the Gardasil clinical trials.

In noting that Merck also “seems to have prevented independent studies of AAHS,” the Danes repeated a critique aired by world-famous aluminum expert Christopher Exley in 2018. In an extensive discussion of different aluminum-based adjuvants and their immunological mechanisms of action, Exley and co-authors emphasized the importance of studying aluminum adjuvants one by one, as each is “chemically and biologically dissimilar with concomitantly potentially distinct roles in vaccine-related adverse events.”

Concerningly, the Vaxelis liquid suspension is adjuvanted onto not just AAHS, but also another aluminum adjuvant — aluminum phosphate). The package insert disingenuously shorthands the combination of adjuvants as “aluminum salts.”

How this double whammy of aluminum (319 micrograms per vaccine dose) interacts with the vaccine’s six antigens, or Vaxelis’s numerous other ingredients, or the heavy aluminum load in other childhood vaccines is largely unknown.

According to the Vaxelis package insert, the vaccine also includes: polysorbate 80 (an ingredient flagged for its propensity to induce hypersensitivity reactions); glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde (problematic chemicals deemed necessary to inactivate pertussis toxin); bovine serum albumin (often harvested from bovine fetuses when female cows are found to be pregnant at slaughter); three different antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin B); ammonium thiocyanate (also a rust inhibitor, weedkiller and defoliant); and yeast protein (associated, notably in hepatitis B vaccines, with autoimmune reactions).

Regulatory loopholes allow manufacturers to “grandfather” ingredients into new vaccines if the components are already present in other licensed vaccines — regardless of how inadequate the original safety testing may have been.

Thus, Merck and Sanofi perceived no need to test Vaxelis for DNA-damaging or cancer-causing effects, and conducted no studies of the ingredients’ pharmokinetics (i.e., how the substances move “into, through, and out of the body”).

The main cautionary note sounded in the meager Vaxelis patient information sheet is to not give Vaxelis to children if they are “allergic to any of the ingredients.”

For thee and thee … but not for me?

The CDC seems to be particularly interested in ensuring that poor and non-white children get Vaxelis. The agency began laying the groundwork to offer Vaxelis through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program — the agency’s vaccine program for the poor — over two years ago, in March 2019.

In September of that year, the CDC followed up with an affirmative vote. Public health departments have been promoting Vaxelis to participating VFC providers since early June 2021.

At its September 2019 meeting, CDC outlined another topic deemed important for discussion in the near future — raising the issue of whether Vaxelis should be “preferentially recommended” for the American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) pediatric population.

The tenuous rationale, according to the meeting notes, was because, “in the pre-vaccine era” (more than 35 years ago), “Hib disease occurred at a younger age among the AI/AN population compared to the general population.”

Wave of the future?

Judging from its website, the CDC perceives combination vaccines to be the wave of the future, and has signaled its strong endorsement of Vaxelis by incorporating the new vaccine into its 2021 vaccine schedule.

As if exposure to six antigens were not enough, FDA and CDC also say it is okay for healthcare providers to administer the six-in-one shot at the same time as other vaccines.

These agencies’ characterization of the Vaxelis safety profile as “acceptable” indicates they have either not done their due diligence, or are willing to accept a high level of collateral damage in exchange for the “convenience” of six-in-one shots.

However, as the “overwhelmed by guilt” parents of COVID-vaccine-injured teens are increasingly finding out, convenience is poor consolation for life-changing or life-threatening adverse outcomes.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from CHD

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

A Fundamental Requirement of a Memorable Super Bowl Performer

Is apparently to have an alter ego. (Illuminati symbolism is a plus.)

Since the concept of dissociation/split-personality and mind control has been at the forefront of my thoughts, and the possible strange connection it seems to have on the politicians and celebrities we see in abundance all over the media (both in the past and in today’s society) – I felt compelled to delve a little deeper into this phenomena and see if we can tie in a very popular sports event to the growing rise of questionable content people are being exposed to because of it.

So as a curious researcher, I wanted to take the 11 most memorable super bowl halftime performances, as proclaimed by cnbc writer Sarah Witten, and see if I can make any connections to how many of these artists have (or had) an alter ego, and if there were any strange behavior or allusions that these celebrities may have displayed that would give away some kind of mental and/or physical disturbances.

Let’s begin, shall we?

DISCLAIMER: This post is not meant to debase, defame, or debunk anyone’s persona or reputation. It is only meant to be an objective look into the commonalities that an outside observer would see when comparing these celebrities and their famous lifestyle as an artist and their performances (whether it be a personal performance and/or a stage one).

1. (1993) Michael Jackson

Michael Jackson Super Bowl 1993 Performance HD
Starts off with a relatively nice (aside from occasionally touching his… nether regions – classic Michael Jackson) and crowd-pleasing performance, along with some choreographed dancers, and ends with the “Heal the World” song and the sweet images of children in the audience as well as real children unifying on the stage. Then we have a globe depicting the whole world and the song’s message in itself.

(There’s so much more I can say about this performance, but that would take me into political territory, and I don’t want to derail the topic of this post…)

Alter ego? – YES

Houston Hawkins (claimed by Boy George)
Dave Dave (suspected)

(Some theorize that these alternate personalities were created to protect his identity.)

We all know about the accusations of child molestation and the many surgeries he’s been under, but something that not many people may know about Michael Jackson, is his interest in art – showing what appears to be a haunting look into his mind and what could be depicting duality and dissociation. Although “art” could just be a way to express oneself and may have no deeper meaning, it may also give an insight into one’s mind and what is lurking underneath.

2. (2002) U2

U2 – Superbowl Half-Time Show 2002
U2 pays a tribute to the 9/11 victims, listing the names behind them on a huge screen; no doubt touching the heartstrings of many Americans. Not only that, but he also opens up his jacket at the end of the performance to reveal the American flag on the inside. Again, I do not want to get into the politics of it all, so will just leave it at that…

Alter ego? – YES

Mr. Macphisto – “Mr. MacPhisto is a stage character created by Bono for the Zoo TV tour as it wound through Europe in 1993. The name refers to Mephisto (sometimes written as Mephistopheles), a demon in German literature, who works for Lucifer.

Unusual Behavior?:

Besides his performance as Mr. Macphisto? (no offense, although I’m not going to lie, I love his gold outfit…) And besides his connections with all of our “favorite” people? Like: Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, the WEF, etc.?

You can also check out the subliminal messages that the band (whether they were aware of it or not) played in the background during the concert in 2011 Glastonbury at the same link as above. Or check out the video below and see for yourself.

Not unusual behavior per se, but a proclaimed life-changing experience that made him address a “brush with mortality.”

Below quotes from The Sun:

“I was on the receiving end of a shock to the system myself, a shock that left me clinging on to my own life like a raft,” he writes.

“It’s an arresting experience. I was arrested.”

He describes “facing a wall with my hands up over my head . . . the force screaming at me not to move.”

“I won’t dwell on it,” he adds. “I don’t want to name it. In a reality TV world of minor/major melodrama, I can spare everyone that.”

3. (2004) Janet Jackson

Janet Jackson Super Bowl XXXVIII Halftime Show (2004)
While there were many cameos during this performance, including P. Diddy, Nelly and Kid Rock, it was Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction at the end that inevitably stole the show. We started off with a sexualized dance choreography, then went into the rock performance of, well, Kid Rock. Then finally the finale where Justin Timberlake tears off a part of the costume that Janet Jackson was wearing, revealing one side of her chest.

Alter ego? – YES

To put it bluntly, she allegedly has two alter egos (at least…), one named Damita Jo and the other Strawberry. Apparently they are so hyper-sexual that some of the records they produced are banned in some countries.
With that being said, research at your own risk.

15 Times Ms. Jackson Was Real Nasty

(So from what I understand, Janet Jackson is sexual. But her alter ego, Damita Jo, is even more sexual. But the question is, is she sexual enough? The answer is no. And so another alter ego is made, who’s even more sexual-er than the other two personalities.)

Unusual Behavior?:

Not including the need to produce two different alter egos to justify the highly controversial actions and freedom to express oneself with extremely explicit lyrics and strutting their stuff, there is also the questionable choice of (ahem) decoration that Janet Jackson adorned herself with that just so happened to be exposed to the super bowl viewers.

Was this deliberate? Or an honest accident that has no bearing on any symbolic meaning and that Janet Jackson just thought was a nice, kinky addition to her bodily enhancement?

Iraq: the Star of Ishtar

There are many theories as to what the symbol that Janet Jackson was… wearing, means. The above link is just one of them that some speculate it could represent.
Other than that Janet Jackson just liked the design.

4. (2005) Paul McCartney

Paul McCartney Live At NFL Super Bowl XXXIX Halftime Show
What is undoubtedly a much calmer and low-key performance compared to the previous years, we see Paul McCartney (supposedly…) and some members of his band play a few sets of songs for the audience. Fireworks and some light shows accompany them which is, to be honest, a nice reprieve from the overly gratuitous onslaught from the previous year’s version.

Although Percy Thrillington was basically a made-up invention by Paul and his wife, Linda, and not so much an alter ego, the fact that he tried to build this character and gain a sort of mysterious fame through him is quite telling.

The Fireman is more of a collab between Paul McCartney and the producer/bassist known as Youth.

Unusual Behavior?:

Well, considering that this Paul McCartney may, in fact, not be Paul McCartney at all, and instead is who some people claim to be William Shears Campbell, then I’d say that the unusual behavior award goes to Billy Shears, who has apparently kept up his appearance as Paul McCartney all these years. (Although if this is true, obviously some people didn’t buy into it.)

Of course, another theory is that the old Paul really is dead, and it’s the new, alter ego of Paul taking over. Since he seems to enjoy playing as different personas…

Then there’s tons of theories that The Beatles were tied into the CIA, doubles, mind control, drug propaganda, on top of so much more different suspicions:

Beatles Mind Control (Part 1) Paul is Dead Conspiracy

I want to take the opportunity here to remind everyone to do their own research on these matters. I do not claim that everything that these websites are saying is true. There is so much misinformation, conspiracies, theories, speculations, etc. and coverups involved, that it is hard to dig for the truth. Please take everything in with an open and discerning mind, and not automatically believe everything at face value.

5. (2007) Prince

Let’s Watch Prince’s Super Bowl Halftime Show, The Best We’ve Ever Seen
I don’t title these videos, so I wouldn’t exactly label it “the best we’ve ever seen”, nevertheless, I’m sure it was a fun performance for the audience (however, I have been desensitized to the glitz and glamour of celebrities due to their connections with what I’ve seen as the corrupt entertainment industry, and so have a hard time getting excited from any of these shows…) With that being said, the perseverance that these performers showed (complete with dancers and a huge, dedicated band) staying through a downpour and playing rather spectacularly in it, was a delight to see.

Alter ego? – YES

Several of them.

The Purple One told Oprah that he had “another person” inside of him, sex undetermined, and created music as different characters or under different aliases.” – The List: Prince’s alter egos and aliases

Here are 6 things you probably didn’t know about Prince

They’re right. I didn’t know about any of those things. I don’t make it a point to know about celebrities lives. But now knowing those things, and some other things I’ve uncovered while researching, gives me a deeper insight into this man’s life and the struggles he must have endured. Both from what life throws at us, and at the hands of other people. And also what he himself has dabbled with. Whether willingly or not.

Unusual Behavior?:

Of course throughout this post, “unusual” is subjective. What may be just a fun hobby for someone, could be something strange and unusual for someone else. While it’s not kind to ridicule or make fun of someone with different interests, we also have to be aware that sometimes these “interests” may be a detrimental side effect from trauma, mental and/or physical abuse, etc., or perhaps have a hidden agenda on its own to manipulate the public on how to think. (Whether it actually came from him or his handler(s).)

“One day Prince’s head producer approached Monson and Lizz Luce to say Prince needed a symbol. She didn’t say why—Monson and Luce assumed it would decorate an album cover—but said he wanted the icon to fuse the astrologically inspired Mars-male and Venus-female symbols, and he wanted it soon.”The Fascinating Origin Story of Prince’s Iconic Symbol

Prince and the Illuminati Blood Sacrifice Conspiracy

The above site seeks to expose some theoretical connections between Prince and the Illuminati.
Yes. We all know it’s a “conspiracy”, but Prince himself is known for being a conspiracy theorist as well.

Prince Talks About The Illuminati & Chemtrails

And as we all know, there’s nothing more “unusual” and “bizarre” than someone being a conspiracy theorist, as the msm and social media giants love to remind us every single day.

Perhaps Prince trying to expose a corrupt government agenda is what got him killed off, as some people speculate.

8 Super Creepy Aspects Of Prince’s Death That Almost No One Ever Talks About

6. (2009) Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band

Bruce Springsteen – Superbowl Halftime Show HD 2009 XLIII NFL
Possibly known as THE Most American singer in the states (although some people will disagree with that label…), I took extra care to watch out for unity and “meeting in the middle”, as Bruce Springsteen urged in his 2021 super bowl jeep ad (which ironically got removed after he was allegedly caught with, at least one, DWI…). Needless to say, I didn’t really see so much “unity” at this super bowl performance, as I saw what, to me, appeared to be a highly propagated concert with a concerted effort to highlight black people. And although Clarence Clemons was part of the E Street Band and the only black person playing directly at this venue, we didn’t even get to see him at the end, with the camera panning out but unable to capture him, who seemed to be at the far left end of the video.
Shame. Wasted opportunity.

Alter ego? – Debatable

The Boss – Is this an opinion piece? Or based on fact? I’m not sure. And I’ve already wasted 13:40 seconds of my life watching the whole 2009 super bowl performance, and, to be quite frank, don’t feel like spending even more time digging any deeper onto this story. That’s my opinion, at least.

Bad Scooter – Some people have proposed the theory that Bruce Springsteen is Bad Scooter, the character in his songs, mostly to try to dissect the lyrics in relation to Bruce Springsteen’s life. And of course, the initials of both of the names. B.S. (kind of funny, in hindsight)

This video attempts to make the connection of Bruce Springsteen to the characters that he mentions in his song. Which actually isn’t that unusual. It’s something I’m sure many artists do and what I’d do myself if I were writing a book or a song, movie script, etc.

Unusual Behavior?:

I’ve already derailed a bit on to the political zone, which I kept trying not to, and now here’s another zone I probably shouldn’t approach but will.

First off, I am not saying that being a Catholic is unusual behavior. But I will say that, unfortunately, there seems to be a slight connection between people of a catholic background, and what can be termed as a difficult lifestyle. And I have not even tried to look at the political or religious views of the previous super bowl performers on this list. But after seeing some statements from Bruce Springsteen about his religious upbringing, compelled me to open up this subject.

[Much of my music is a result of] being completely brainwashed by Catholicism in my formative years. It’s given me a very active spiritual life – and made it very difficult for me sexually!

Once a Catholic, always a Catholic.

Source: The Hollowverse | Bruce Springsteen

I’m not exactly sure what Mr. Springsteen means by these quotes, but it’s not the first time that a catholic background has been blamed on a complicated view of the world.

7. (2013) Beyonce

Beyonce – Super Bowl 2013 Halftime Show
Now, I am honestly trying to look at these with as much impartiality as I can, although I let loose a little on a couple of the previous ones, so I am going to try my best to be unbiased.
Again, I can see “unity” alive and well as I see nothing but female performers on this stage. As if making a statement that men are not welcome here. Or that they are pandering to the male population and making it hyper-sexual to appeal to them. Or both! (or neither, but how realistic is that?…)

Alter ego? – YES

Sasha Fierce – Even if you’re not into the celebrity gossip or stay up to date in their worldly affairs, the word of her alter ego probably crossed your ears or eyes at some point. If not, then there’s no better time to look into it, if you’re interested.

And then, of course, there’s the idea that Sasha Fierce is actually a demon, possessing Beyonce.

And I remember, right before I performed, I raised my hands up, and, it was kind of the first time I, I felt something else come into me.

Stunning.

Although to be honest, I look worse than this when I’m angry. Does it mean “demonic possession”? Not necessarily.

Unusual Behavior?:

This video shows Beyonce rocking back and forth in a steady rhythm in the company of Jay-Z. Her heavy-lidded eyes seems to indicate that she is either dazed, tired… drugged, maybe? Some people have pointed out that the rocking motion may be a means to self-soothe due to stress and/or anxiety.

What do you think? Stress? Psychological issues? Mind control?

8. (2015) Katy Perry

Katy Perry Super Bowl Halftime Show 2015 Live | FULL Performance | NFL Super Bowl XLIX
(Oooh, I love ads as soon as I’m about to watch a concert. And all of a sudden I have a sudden urge for a Pepsi.)
What may seem like an innocuous concert may in fact be rife with symbolism. I can’t get into all of them here or in any of the other performances – since it is not something I have studied in depth, but there are better outlets that can break it down extensively. (TheVigilantCitizen and IlluminatiWatcher) They go into it in a very detailed manner, and although I do believe in some of the shady going ons of the “elite” and their use of symbols, I also think maybe in some cases it may be reaching.

Alter ego? – YES

Katy Perry – Confused? Her real name is Katheryn Hudson, and her stage name, Katy Perry, is actually her alter ego.

Kathy Beth Terry – Seems more like a character played on a music video than an actual alter ego personality. But what do I know?

“A lot of people are living in fear from something that happened in their childhood, or some form of PTSD they picked up along the way, and I created this wonderful character called Katy Perry that I very much am, and can step into all the time, but I created that character out of protection,’ she told The Observer.”
Katy Perry created her character for ‘protection’ because she was too scared to be herself

Unusual Behavior?:

Yes, she faints on stage, maybe from exhaustion? But some people have pointed out that she fainted at pretty much the same point at a different concert, and that it was part of the performance so she can get a costume change. … I don’t know about you, but that’s a really strange reason to fake faint on stage. Was it all an act? Or just a coverup?

Katy Perry Mind Control Session (Disguised as a Therapy Session)

Unfortunately, the video for this session is not available. I have been trying to find it and will update this post if/when I do. I have noticed that plenty of websites have this same video mysteriously disappeared from their site. If you come across the video and know where it’s available or where I can find more information, please let me know.

An alleged quote from the video from Page Six (where the video is also missing):

“The therapy session eventually ended with Perry picking a card out of the therapist’s ‘angel bowl’ “to see what the angels tell her”.

And after Perry draws out the word “freedom” she absolutely loses it, bursting into tears.”

9. (2016) Coldplay

Coldplay’s FULL Pepsi Super Bowl 50 Halftime Show feat. Beyoncé & Bruno Mars! | NFL
Now I have to admit, back in my early days of not really paying attention to symbolism, lyric meanings, the music industry in general, I have been guilty of liking some of Coldplay’s songs. But now, I don’t know if it’s because my metaphorical eyes are open, but I’m seeing “symbols” everywhere, even in this relative harmless show. And yes, I can see how people would enjoy the different artists, bands coming together and having a standoff, but then coming together at the end. It seemed like a fun show, even if I don’t agree with some of these artists’ views.

Alter ego? – YES

The Nappies – Honestly, I’m sorry to subject my readers to some of this content, because I’m usually about exposing hypocrisy and getting the truth out to the public, so again I’d like to warn you to please click the link above at your own risk. (Or don’t click on it at all.)

I wonder if some of these “alter egos” is just a kind of fantasy escape from their everyday, normal personas, and that they actually do want to dissociate from, say, a personality like The Nappies, for example, (which honestly just looks like ridiculous, goofy (if not immature) frivolity from a group of guys), so that they don’t have to tie in these “freedom of expressions” with their traditional selves.

Unusual Behavior?:

Well, besides all the “illuminati” symbols they seem to display all over their work, same as pretty much every single artist on this list, there is also the suspicious circumstance that when I get close to revealing what seems to be real controversial subjects regarding this band, it has been deleted. Now we know that censorship is not anything new, but for some of this material to be really difficult to track down, is pretty bizarre.

There were a few websites with some links/videos missing to what they were referencing, but the link below delves into the nitty gritty of what Coldplay and some of their work might mean. This seems to be an effort on the part of the writer to give their opinion on the band and some of the symbolism that was used and their meaning. I am not taking it as fact, but just as an objective look.

Coldplay: Illuminati Magicians of Super Bowl 50

10. (2017) Lady Gaga

Lady Gaga’s FULL Pepsi Zero Sugar Super Bowl LI Halftime Show | NFL
With a rather acrobatic start to the performance by Lady Gaga, I can only imagine how much time and effort went into some of these shows. It’s definitely not to take away from the stamina and practice all of the dancers have to pull shows like this off. Including the other performances, of course. And when you take into some testimonies from mind control victims, or those under hypnosis, they tend to be able to endure a lot more physical duress than the average, ordinary person. Just thought I’d throw that out there. Even Beyonce herself said in an interview that there are just some things that Sasha Fierce can do that she herself cannot.

Alter ego? – YES

Jo Calderone – “Just a guy”, according to this short interview with him; not a singer, or an actor, but could be a comedian.

A more detailed look into the identity of “Jo Calderone”:

Unusual Behavior?:

There’s actually quite a bit. From her very slowly getting into a vehicle:

(Is this just a publicity stunt?)

To her cheekily showing who her allegiance is for:

And then her strange behavior of covering her eye right after the host says, “Good Lord.”

(Which seems pretty on par with the whole Al Roker / Holy Ghost debacle.)

And let’s not forget Lady Gaga’s close relationship to Marina Abramovic, which is huge news in itself thanks to the “spirit cooking” wikileaks fiasco.

Lady Gaga snuggles up to performance artist Marina Abramovic on haystack at Hamptons benefit

11. (2020) Shakira and Jennifer Lopez

OMG, not fair. I have to do both of them? (This one’s going to be short, because I’m burnt out.)

Shakira & J. Lo’s FULL Pepsi Super Bowl LIV Halftime Show
I am trying not to be mean here, so I will just say we have more singing, and more dancing.

(By the way, did you know, “Back then, the Roman government kept the Roman people pacified by offering them free food and rousing entertainment in the Roman Colosseum. Now, “bread and circuses” applies to any civic or governmental entity — or any situation, really — in which the masses willingly accept short-term solutions to ease their discontent.” – What does ‘bread and circuses’ mean?)

… Where’s my free food?

Alter ego? – YES and YES

Shakira:
She Wolf

Jennifer Lopez:
– J. Lo (now deceased)
– Lola

Not much more to say here. To break it down, yes, they both have an alter ego. Just like all the others on this list.

And yes, they both made “illuminati” references in their work and style.

 

Unusual Behavior?:

Because I’m honestly getting to the end of my sanity, and yes, we all display unusual behaviors here and there (some more than others and who seem to be tied to some kind of nefarious agenda), here are some symbolism from both Shakira and Jennifer Lopez that are shown throughout their videos/performances, etc.

Not so fun fact: Not even half way through this list, I had a huge headache and wanted to throw my hands up in the air and declare that ‘yes, they all have an “alter ego” ‘, because apparently it’s a prerequisite of becoming a super-duper-uber mega star. But, I pushed on and finished the list legitimately. Sort of.

Now whether these people are/were really suffering from an alter ego or dissociation program of sorts, only the ones involved would know. It could be simply that these are aliases or nicknames, meant to give the performers more fame and fodder. Or side projects to tackle something new and different.

But the similarities of each performer to the ties of some kind of hidden cabal is quite glaring and hard to ignore. Each one has connections to certain parties and organizations and is surrounded by so much symbolism. I know some people just excuse this away by saying that it’s just an “artistic expression” and it doesn’t mean anything… but when you combine the bigger picture compared to the individuals behind the scenes involved, and then you dig even deeper into what all these symbols mean, plus the testimony of others trying to get their voices heard about this agenda, a strange (ancient) plot can be seen.

And let’s not forget. MK Ultra and mind control is a REAL program, stated by the CIA themselves. It is heartbreaking that these individuals are being manipulated and controlled against their will. And far be it for me to suggest that a worldwide dominance is aimed for by tptsb.

THE MEDIA IS THE ANTICHRIST

From U2’s 2011 Glastonbury performance – after a slew of quickly flashed (sometimes awful) words displayed on the screen (starts @ 4:22).

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”