SHOCKING Images of Nanosensors/Nanowires in the Vaccines | Dr. Pablo Campra: “The [graphene] system can self-assembly once injected in the body”

Dr. Campra also poses a very serious, life-changing inquiry.

As has been mentioned throughout this site in numerous posts, I have focused on some of the technological advancements and agendas that those at the top levels of global dominance have tried to implement onto the rest of the population.

Vaccines, of course, at least at the time being, seeming to be the main focal point.

The admissions from several doctors, scientists, “world leaders” – that their initiative involves combining medical drug therapies (again, namely vaccines) with gene-editing tools and digital technology – should be an obvious sign that this is not only an attempt at changing our human nature, but also a means of utmost control and surveillance.

“We’re entering the era of the “Internet of Bodies”: collecting our physical data via a range of devices that can be implanted, swallowed or worn.”

“In 2017, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration approved the first use of digital pills in the United States. Digital pills contain tiny, ingestible sensors, as well as medicine. Once swallowed, the sensor is activated in the patient’s stomach and transmits data to their smartphone or other devices.”

“As the Internet of Bodies spreads into every aspect of our existence, we are facing a range of new challenges.”

Web Archive/weforum: Tracking how our bodies work could change our lives

What better way to initiate this goal than to plan for a worldwide pandemic [Event 201 (conducted in 2019 to address a worldwide coronavirus pandemic)… “This board has been urgently convened by the World Economic Forum.” – Anita Cicero], induce widespread fear and panic in the media, in order to provoke a response to get people to demand a tracking app/vaccine?

The answer’s are there. If one sets aside bias and disbelief.

Dr. Pablo Campra, PhD in Chemical Sciences, Department of Agronomy, has independently researched several vials of different COVID vaccines at the request of La Quinta Columna, and has found stunning (terrifying) images that depict what can only be described as nanotechnology.

Along with fiber looking material resembling Morgellons, Dr. Pablo Campra is sure that there is graphene oxide in these vials. Now he addresses engineers, technicians, electricians – anyone who is familiar with technology and nanoparticles, to come forward and do their own independent research to investigate what these “fibers, wires, particulates, chips” really are and why they are in the vaccines.

While Dr. Campra and many others are already hypothesizing and theorizing what these vaccines really are, their conclusions are incredibly alarming, and should be a wake-up call to us all to reflect on what’s really going on in the world.

Full transcript of the interview between Stew Peters and Dr. Pablo Campra.
Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Stew Peters: “Well, in this show we’ve repeatedly mentioned the work by La Quinta Columna in Spain. That name means the 5th Column, and it’s a group of dissident researchers who’ve investigated these shots being falsely referred to as vaccines.

Most importantly, they’re the ones who studied a vaccine sample and found graphene oxide in it.

Dr. Pablo Campra is a professor of chemical sciences at the University of Almeria. But he’s also affiliated with La Quinta Columna and has dedicated himself to performing an independent analysis of vaccine samples.

And now he’s released his findings in 3 parts. Earlier this month he put his full graphene oxide findings on Researchgate.

His findings were clear. Using a technique called micro raman spectroscopy, he found ample evidence of graphene oxide structures within random vaccine samples.

But Dr. Campra’s follow-up research could be even more important. If it can be. In another researchgate paper, Campra speculates that microstructures seen in the vaccines made of graphene oxide could be components in a wireless nano-sensor network.

It’s all pretty remarkable. So we’re happy to have Dr. Campra on with us now to get some of the details.

Thank you so much for being here from Spain.”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Yes, Stew. Nice to be on the show. I’m a follower.”

Stew Peters: “Great, we’re happy to have you.

So we originally reported on your graphene oxide findings. They were discovered by Dr. Jane Ruby. You’re still convinced that graphene oxide is in these shots? That’s indisputable?

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Yeah, definitely.

Well, first to make clear, I don’t belong to La Quinta Columna. La Quinta Columna is the channel of free information. And they hired me to – they asked me to, to do this research to detect the graphene particles in vials. Because they have the theory that those vials contain some material that can be responsible for the magnetic effects, the magnetization of bodies, and also for the emission of bluetooth calls. Bluetooth radio waves from vaccinated people. So, they asked me to find the prime material for all the system – that’s supposed to be graphene oxide.

And that was my role in the first level of research. The other two levels is engineers, experts on this field that are doing it now. And they have – they managed to compare some images from my research and they, they claim that those are nano-routers and nano-sensors. So it’s an on-going research. It’s not my responsibility.

Image source for all 3 images: Dr. Pablo Campra/Stew Peters Show

Stew Peters: “So was a chemical analysis ever done to verify graphene oxide?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Yeah. What we did is on a spectral investigation. Once you get the micro raman picture, you get the photographs, and then you focus the laser beam on those bodies and then you can be sure of the structure they have.

So we detected the graphene structure in some of the nanoparticles that we were screening in the vials.

Stew Peters: “Was the work ever replicated, in more vials?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “No. – Yeah, we, we had only 7 different vials from 4 different trademarks. And we managed to find this structure in 28 nanoparticles out of 110 possible graphene particles, according to their image. The micro raman is a technique where you match the image with a spectra. Then you can be sure that what you find is that structure.”

Stew Peters: “So you guys came out with this, it’s been months now, that you guys came out with this. We reported on it. There have been a lot of independent researchers, microscopy experts, scientists, that have corroborated, ‘yes, graphene oxide is in these’.

We recently had a Pfizer whistleblower on this program – Melissa McAtee, who said, look, here’s an email that specifically tells the PR department at Pfizer, from the top scientist over there, how to handle this graphene oxide thing being in there.

So they’re not even denying anymore, really, that graphene oxide is in these things. But fact-checkers originally were all over this. And they used, ‘well Pfizer said that it’s not in there’, as their basis for fact-checking you. So to those people, what would you say, to anybody who doubts that graphene oxide is in these vials. In these bioweapon injections. What would you say to them?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Well you know, there’s very little free research on this trail. There’s only a few people, isolated people; institutions/academy is out of this research, totally. So, it’s only a few people that is taking pictures of objects or nano- nanoparticles that may resemble graphene oxide.

But I… I haven’t found anyone who’s done a similar analysis. So I claim that people like, for instance, Carrie Madej, she had a great interview with you or Botha, who are watching blood samples. They can use the same technique of micro raman, because I have seen some nanoparticles – these dark carbonaceous blots, these big particles. And sure, those are graphene. And they just need to, to focus their beam of a micro raman laser on those, and make sure they have that structure on blood.

I haven’t done it. But, I claim they could do it. So I’m sure anyone using the, this technique can detect this structure. Just detect. Then we have to characterize it, that can be different types of graphene – the concentration, toxicity… we haven’t worked on that. But what we claim is that more independent researchers do this the same, and replicate our findings.”

Stew Peters: “Why do you think it’s so important that graphene oxide is exposed? I mean, obviously it’s a toxic substance. Why do you think it’s in these vials.”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Well, first of all, it’s not in the list of ingredients. That’s important. And it – it’s been cited in literature as the basis of this nano – wireless nano-sensor/wireless network. So… it’s been cited in for 10 years, now. So now some experts here in Spain, they have located nanoparticles that might be part of the – of this system.

And graphene is the prime material of this system. So, what we think, what my find is – I haven’t seen the whole assembly of this systems. But the system can self-assembly once injected in the body. So, this is a new line of research.”

Stew Peters: “Do you see, so – there’s been a lot of speculation about this 5G connectivity. Is that specifically what you’re talking about? I mean, this is becoming less tin-foil hat, less conspiracy theory, and more reality as you dig into this? I mean, I’m relying on your expertise here.”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “No, it’s not my expertise, but anybody can enter in the blog of these experts from Spain, it’s called, corona2inspect. Corona2inspect.

They have present this theory – according to scientific literature, and matching the images from our work, with images from literature, and they’re sure that this system is possible nowadays, based on graphene. And they’re discovering everyday new elements of the whole network.

So we need to match this also with the bluetooth signal from vaccinated people. So it’s the whole researchers – the free […]. My responsibility is only to detect it. Detecting the prime material.”

Stew Peters: “Did you just say ‘bluetooth’? You, did – did you just say a bluetooth signal from vaccinated people? They’re emitting a bluetooth signal? Is that right?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Yeah, that – there’s a group in France, we’re in contact with them, and they’re doing a more detailed research on this. But anybody can do a research on this. With a simple mobile phone, and bluetooth scanning app; and iphones and Samsungs don’t work, but you need to download an app.

And you can get very easily this MAC code, M.A.C. code – it’s 6 letters and numbers, from many people. And then you have to do the research of making sure that they don’t have a small watch, or headphones, or Internet of the Things devices that could yield this image.

And we are sure from this research that this signal is real. It’s real. Not in all vaccinated people, but in a high percentage of people.”

Stew Peters: “Why do you think it’s different from some people than from others?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Well, it depends. There’s a high variability in the vials we have observed. Also in the adverse effects. So it’s not on the […] jabbing. And so that’s quite a big variability.

And also the system in some people gets installed, and other people don’t. For instance, graphene is something that you can buy at the grade with months of time. So like if we’re doing 3 and 6 months, you can degradate it. But if you get another jab, then you get the system again back. So, we think some people are more prone to install this system, than others.”

Stew Peters: “I just cannot get over what you’re – what you’re talking about. My brain just keeps going back to this, human being’s are emitting a discoverable bluetooth transmission.

I mean, that is not supposed to be happening, Dr. Campra. Is it?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “This is in literature. The system is, has been signed and implemented long ago. The new thing is that they are probably injecting it into people without their consent. So the system can be used to control your neural network, your – your mind, your emotions, it can control your physiology; it works.

It’s described in literature. But I’m not expert on this, but I think the expert on this should take a look at our pictures, pictures in blood, and try to… unveil the system. That we think, well, it resembles what this – what’s called in the Revelation book, the mark of the beast. This can do the same things. You can buy, sell things, it can control and monitor your mind, your faults, so… I think it’s something worth it to be […].”

Stew Peters: “Here in the United States, we talk about things like critical race theory, transgender acceptance, the indoctrination of our kids in schools. There’s an incessant push to get this injection into our school children; into our kids. Presumably to control their thought process. Their minds. Because the indoctrination is not working, or, maybe in some homes there’s a mother and a father who vehemently oppose that, and teach real core values to their children. 

Our military is being subjected to this shot. They’re being discharged, possibly court martialed, and thrown into the brig if they’re not injected. Imagine controlling the minds of an entire military.

Dr. Pablo Campra:Yeah, this is the feature of the mark of the beast, is this, is that it has to be mandatory. And anyone excluded from it will be excluded from society. So the technology exists, it’s described in the literature, and we just need it to be mandatory.

And then we have to think about which – what time of the history we are living on. I am not – you are a Christian, I know, I am Catholic. And we know this time is unique in history. So… we think we might be very near to unveil this mark.

Stew Peters: “Unbelievable. Um, I would like – would you agree to come back for an extended sit-down interview with me where we can talk a little bit more in depth about these things? Because I think that – I mean, people obviously have been waiting for a very long time to hear from you on this research. Would you come back again for an exclusive with me? We’ll sit down?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Yeah, sure. I will be happy. The problem is I am not expert in nanotechnologies. I am just working in the first level of research detecting this material. And I think you should better find someone in Spain or there, I’m sure there are many technicians in the U.S. who know about these systems. And they should save the – the images which, again, they are in my researchgate. We are uploading all of them. They can save these elements, could be the elements of this network.

But I’m, I’m happy to go back, but I don’t have much to say about the system; it’s not my expertise. It’s just a working hypothesis that engineers are working here.”

Stew Peters: “I’ve got about a minute left, what is… what do you want to say? What is the most important thing that you want to get out here today?”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “I guess tell people that they have to choose between the truth, and the false. Problems like yours, they have people to do it. So. That’s what I have to say.”

Stew Peters: “Dr. Pablo Campra, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.”

Dr. Pablo Campra: “Thanks. I appreciate it.”

Some additional images that Dr. Pablo Campra captured from various vials and states of the COVID vaccines are the following:

(for a full account, please visit his researchgate publications @Pablo Campra)

Small list of self-assembling/graphene oxide/nanoparticles in the medical/scientific literature:

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21080682/ ] “Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide and DNA into multifunctional hydrogels” (2010)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23212421/ ] “Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials” (2012)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23369286/ ] “Self-assembled free-standing graphene oxide fibers” (2013)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24852899/ ] “Self-assembly of graphene oxide at interfaces” (2014)

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.201700626 ] “Self-Assembled Graphene-Based Architectures and Their Applications” (2017)

[ https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/nh/c8nh00318a ] “Graphene oxide touches blood: in vivo interactions of bio-coronated 2D materials” (2018)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33112593/ ] “Person-Specific Biomolecular Coronas Modulate Nanoparticle Interactions with Immune Cells in Human Blood” (2020)

One last mention, there are allusions (to outright admissions…) of attempts at altering humankind that one can find throughout various esoteric/philosophical/religious literature. What one chooses to do with that information is up to them. But to say that this is not a goal of dominating forces would be incredibly naive and gullible.

Thank you so much to Dr. Pablo Campra for investigating these vaccines and going through so much research. Having an honest person’s perspective is incredibly needed, especially in a time where deceit, manipulation and censorship has run rampant throughout the media.

Many blessings to Dr. Campra and other researchers, readers, interviewers like Stew Peters, etc. who are seeking the truth.

*Featured image source: Dr. Pablo Campra/Stew Peters Show

Shady “Business” Practices of the NIH and the Human Genome Projects May Have Ties to Jeffrey Epstein | With Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, Eric Lander, Bill Gates

Multiple health/science organizations have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. The same organizations trying to enforce mandatory vaccines.

Somewhat of a disclaimer: I put “may” in the title of this post to deflect direct allegations that “may” end up turning out to be false. Of course, in the world we find ourselves in, where money, power and hidden motives rule, it seems the same key players are involved, over and over again. I’d say that is no coincidence and holds incredible importance when addressing the strange situations that are occurring around us.

I also focus on the names given above because they are the most prominent figure-heads of the “health initiative” and have high-ranking positions who may also just happened to have ties with Jeffrey Epstein. Again, coincidence? I’m inclined not to think so.

Why is bringing up connections of Jeffrey Epstein to the NIH and the Human Genome Project so important?

Well, other than the obvious reasons (convicted serial pedophile and blackmail extraordinaire – along with Ghislaine Maxwell, currently under trial) are the incredibly suspicious interests that Epstein has divulged and perhaps invested in to further his goals.

Take the following, for consideration:

“- He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women / Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies

– longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence

– Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

– Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.”

Original source: Jeffrey Epstein Hoped to Seed Human Race With His DNA
Alternative source found here: [ https://storageunit.home.blog/2020/02/17/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna-at-zorro-ranch/ ]

Some studies that Jeffrey Epstein supported and sponsored are the following:

(all 4 published wholly or in part by Martin A. Nowak – “Professor of Mathematics and of Biology at Harvard University. He works on the mathematical description of evolutionary processes, including the evolution of cooperation and human language, as well as the dynamics of virus infections and human cancer” [ https://oeb.harvard.edu/people/martin-nowak ])

2006[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279745/ ] “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”

“Support from the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2007[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387227/ ] “Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs”

“Support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the John Templeton Foundation and the NSF/NIH joint program in mathematical biology (NIH grant 1R01GM078986-01) (M.A.N.) and FCT-Portugal (J.M.P.) is gratefully acknowledged. The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University is sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein.”

2008[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567469/ ] “Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (H.O.), the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health joint program in mathematical biology (NIH Grant R01GM078986), and J. Epstein.”

2010[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842638/ ] “Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity”

“This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation, the National Science Foundation/National Institutes of Health Joint Program in Mathematical Biology (National Institutes of Health grant R01GM078986) and J. Epstein.”

Of course, the studies mentioned above are all tied into one particular grant, by the NIH, no less. And again, as a reminder, who is the head (soon to be former) of the NIH? Mr. Francis Collins (who is also known for his leadership position of the Human Genome Project), who is to step down from the NIH role at the end of the year, but yet continue his research at his lab.

And that of course ties into with Anthony Fauci as a close colleague and friend of Francis Collins, and as most of us know about Fauci, is the lead of the Coronavirus Task Force and director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases – a branch within the NIH) – and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Mrs. Christine Grady, wife of Anthony Fauci and also Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

But that also brings up a Mr. Eric Lander, well known for his work on the Human Genome Project, who has met Jeffrey Epstein at least twice, according to records. Does this necessarily mean that Eric Lander was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and all of the allegations and crimes he has been engaged in? Of course not. But it does set a suspicious light in regards to Jeffrey Epstein’s close relationships to other scientific researchers, who many have alleged to have known about Epstein’s interests and various fundings into these projects, not to mention his sordid history. It would appear that Jeffrey Epstein was quite a prolific (no pun intended) character in the scientific and medical community.

And it would make sense that someone with money, plus a sinister desire to populate the world with his offspring, would attempt to get close to those who could further his goals. So for multiple scientists and researchers to have a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein would not be unheard of. However, this points a very specific light on those who do seem to entertain Mr. Epstein’s ideals.

And now with Mr. Eric Lander, selected by Joe Biden as the head of the Science and Technology division,

Jeffrey Epstein (left), Eric Lander (right)

it makes one wonder, to what degree would money be a motivational factor, even if ideologies differ? Would some scientists care? There would not only be excessive financial compensation, but it may also satiate a scientific curiosity of a “what if” scenario.

Then of course we have to mention Bill Gates, who isn’t necessarily a scientist or medical researcher, but who has “philanthropic” ventures into transhumanism, synthetic meat, genetically modifying products and human beings, as it is, despite what “fact-checkers” try to refute.

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics. In 2014, the World Health Organization issued guidelines for testing genetically modified mosquitoes, including standards for efficacy, biosafety, bioethics, and public participation. In 2016, the National Academy of Sciences built on the WHO’s guidelines with recommendations for responsible conduct in gene-drive research on animals. (The Gates Foundation co-funded this work with the National Institutes of Health, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.)”

[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-04-10/gene-editing-good?linkId=50322894 ] “Gene Editing for Good | How CRISPR Could Transform Global Development” by Bill Gates

“Gene editing in animals or even humans raises more complicated questions of safety and ethics.”

…Well, it’s a good thing Bill Gates is such good friends with Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, both of whom work in the NIH and have leadership roles; including Fauci’s wife, head of Bioethics at the NIH. Very useful and convenient, I’m sure.

And who, by several accounts, has met with Jeffrey Epstein not once, not twice, but NUMEROUS times.

“In fact, beginning in 2011, Mr. Gates met with Mr. Epstein on numerous occasions — including at least three times at Mr. Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse, and at least once staying late into the night, according to interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the relationship, as well as documents reviewed by The New York Times.”

Bill Gates (left), Francis Collins (middle), Anthony Fauci (right) – Source: nih.gov

Now, of course we can’t claim “guilty by association”, right? But what about when the individuals/institutions listed above have direct funding and sponsorships from Jeffrey Epstein and sit on the Board of Directors of these very organizations? Can they claim plausible deniability?

“Even though Epstein did not donate to PED or Harvard after 2007, he played an “indirect but significant role” in facilitating a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to PED in 2015.”

Epstein, Martin Nowak, Eric Lander, MIT and a very sinister genome project tied to the Covid test

“Epstein had suggested at one point that the John Templeton Foundation could match any donations dollar for dollar. Unfortunately for Ito and Epstein, a spokesperson for the Foundation could find no record of Epstein’s plan, and provided no funding, according to Farrow.”

MIT’s Media Lab Director Resigns From NYT Company Board After Pocketing Millions In ‘Anonymous’ Epstein Donations

Although these two statements seem to contradict each other, and the fact that Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as a sponsor on Martin A. Nowak’s published studies (unless we are to conclude that Mr. Nowak is lying about his sponsorships; though in light of multiple various sources agreeing that this was a huge interest of Epstein, and with proof of various meetings with those in higher positions, the supposition that Mr. Nowak is lying is highly unlikely), we can’t ignore the fact that anonymous donors and facilitators were likely happening, especially when groups/foundations involved knew what kind of detrimental publicity would arise from a known connection with this infamous criminal.

Continuing on with the John Templeton Foundation, who named Francis Collins as the recipient of the 2020 Templeton Award, and who was involved in the very studies that Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded, according to the ncbi/pubmed articles listed above (of which were also supported by a NIH grant, I should add) also sponsors BioLogos, a “Christian” outlet founded by Francis Collins who is eager to combine science and religion together. Make no mistake, the material exposed on the BioLogos site is meant to lead Christians astray; with many articles a propaganda piece to influence and convince Christians that getting the vaccine is for the betterment of humankind.

But again, this still raises the issue that even if Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci aren’t directly involved with Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Gates is, and seems to be a very significant one at that. With such financial sway and investments, including funding and sponsorships of numerous organizations, largely of which consist of pharmaceutical companies that just so happen to be insisting that everyone on the planet needs to take these mRNA/DNA “vaccines” – and when researching their possible involvement in CRISPR technology as well – this sets a very alarming precedence on who’s really in charge of our health system.

So again, why is it such a concern that the heads of the National Institutes of Health, and the heads of the Human Genome Projects, and prominent scientists/researchers, and professors at acclaimed universities, and billionaire philanthropists who have a vested interest in CRISPR/gene editing technology, have such business (and perhaps personal) ties and gains related to a man who wanted to populate the world with his seed and went so far as developing a “breeding ranch” and funded studies devoted to human evolution?

The answer speaks for itself, honestly.

Now, with all of Epstein’s connections and influence, not to mention all of his funding of numerous projects, are we to really believe that those involved with his projects have the best interest of humankind at heart? The same people, mind you, who are directly involved with pushing a “COVID vaccine” on the WHOLE WORLD?

And are we to really believe that the Director of the NIH, Francis Collins, and Eric Lander, a very prominent figure in the scientific community, including at Harvard and MIT:

“An influential geneticist, molecular biologist, and mathematician, Dr. Lander has won many awards and recognitions for his work in mapping and discovering the human genome. Among other former positions, Dr. Lander was a leader in the international Human Genome Project (1990-2003) and served as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) for President Barack Obama (2009-2017). He was a professor of biology at MIT, professor of systems biology at Harvard Medical School, and President and Founding Director of the Board Institute at MIT and Harvard before going on leave in 2021 to serve at the White House.”

[ https://chinaus-icas.org/biden-administration-international-affairs-personnel-tracker/biden-personnel-tracker-climate-health-and-technology/eric-lander-presidential-science-advisor-director-of-the-ostp/ ]

had NO idea about Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement in these studies, supported by the very same institutions they oversee? This either speaks to their complicity, or their ineptitude in directing these organizations. Is this an unfair assessment? Does it instead speak of the inherent flaws (or perhaps strengths, depending on who’s looking at it) of compartmentalization and the excessive ways it can get out of control without proper supervision? But this would ultimately ignore the very real dilemma of bribery, coercion, threats and blackmail – of which Mr. Jeffrey Epstein seems to have been adept in and the center of in various circles.

With credentials such as boasting of sponsoring scientific giants, some of which have won the Nobel Prize:

“The Foundation has also had the priviledge of sponsoring many prominent scientists including Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Eric Lander, George Church, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, Lee Smolin and Gregory Benford and Nobel laureates, Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.” – Web archive: Jeffrey Epstein Ideas Forum

we have to ask ourselves, why would Jeffrey Epstein lie about Eric Lander, out of everyone? Are we sure he embellished his sponsorships, as multiple articles claim? Or is perhaps the person who has been chosen as President Joe Biden’s top Science Advisor and Director of OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy) denying such claims in order to preserve his own reputation? In the same sense, wouldn’t a person selected for such a prestigious title undergo a stringent selective process, including investigations of past connections and potential involvement in secret programs?

That is, of course, if the presidential/government committees aren’t involved in it themselves…

One last note: am I saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind behind these nefarious ideas? No. I think there were individuals above him who were directing where these studies and blackmailing efforts were going and who keep themselves largely hidden from the public eye; and who, in my opinion, may have supplied Epstein’s budget. There may also have been connections with certain alphabet agencies involved in these schemes, although these suspicions remain to be substantiated.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."

“Trust the Science” – …”But not THAT Science!”

With so much conflicting info, who do we listen to?

The interesting mental gymnastics that one has to entertain in order to accept the official narrative that’s been paraded about by the government, health agencies, mainstream media, big tech platforms, etc. is absolutely mind-boggling.

There are many statements from the government and health agencies to “trust the science”. Yet, this comes with a very huge deflection. For instance, the very same people who assert that we need to trust the science and the scientists, REFUSE to acknowledge the expert opinions of some of the most well-known and respected doctors and scientists, and instead say, “Oh no. Not THOSE scientists. They’re “misinformation”.”

Mm hm. So because some of the most educated and highly renowned professionals state something different than what the government/health organizations say, then we SHOULD NOT trust THOSE SCIENTISTS, but only those who follow a certain narrative and have the same opinions that the global health agencies are trying to enforce. Anyone else who says otherwise is, apparently, not following the science…

So even though we have some incredibly intelligent scientists/doctors/virologists, etc. with these impressive credentials:

Dr. Peter McCullough – Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine / Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist / President Cardiorenal Society of America / Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine / Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine / Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Vaccine is a “Horrendous Bioweapon” | [Full Interview Transcript]

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich International trial lawyer who has sued some of the most successful large fraudulent companies like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank. He is also one of the four founding members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. He has written and published several books in the field of banking law, medical law, and international private law.
“This Vaccine Is About Control” – Reiner Fuellmich (Jerm Warfare 06.29.21)

Dr. Michael Yeadon “Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He also published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.”
Mike Yeadon Warns Vaccines May be Deliberate Depopulation Ploy

Dr. Robert A. Malone M.D., M.S., “scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories, Dr. Malone is an internationally recognized scientist (virology, immunology, molecular biology) and is known as one of the original inventors of mRNA vaccination and DNA Vaccination.”
Dr. Robert Malone Explains mRNA Vaccines and The Noble Lie Used by The Medical Establishment to Manipulate Vaccine Propaganda

Dr. David E. Martin PhD, founder of IQ100 Index and developer of linguistic genome, and “until recently, best known as the founder of M·CAM®, the international leader in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance, David E. Martin is a modern day renaissance man, whose roles have included Professor, Lecturer, Chairman and CEO.”
David Martin, Ph.D., COVID-19: Vaccine or Gene-Therapy? Deceptive medical labeling exposed

Dr. Richard Fleming “MD, FICA, FACA, FASNC is the Director of Cardiovascular and Breast Cancer research at the Not For Profit Camelot Foundation and the Fleming Heart & Health Institute located in Omaha, Nebraska, USA. Dr. Fleming is an internist and nuclear cardiologist. He is a member of the National Credentials Committee for the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.”
Dr. Richard Fleming warns the “vaccine is the bioweapon” in bombshell interview with Mike Adams

(a very small handful out of MANY) speaking out against these incredibly unnecessary and suspicious “vaccines”, we are told that their information is “bad science” or that all of a sudden these well-established scientists have no idea what they’re talking about anymore.

Again, I repeat: Mm hm…

But, to be fair, I am not scientifically inclined. However, when considering multiple different factors, such as, “Who would benefit from telling lies? The doctors listed above? (And any of the other doctors/scientists/healthcare workers/concerned citizens, etc. who are speaking out what they see as unnecessary and dangerous measures?) Or the proponents of the vaccine/pharma companies?” – I mean, just from this assessment alone it can (AND SHOULD) give someone serious reflection and contemplation that something is not right with this whole situation.
 
Secondly, in line with the previous question, who would lose the most credibility if it were found out that they were lying or spreading misinformation?
 
The doctors who are speaking up against these vaccines are already risking their careers, their reputation, their anonymity in trying to alert the world that these vaccines are NOT what they are touted to be.
 
While a number of individuals in the healthcare industry who are endorsing the vaccines are receiving funding and grants in order to push as much of the public to accept the vaccines as possible. And if word gets out that the COVID/vaccine agenda was, infact, a nefarious push to infect people with a bioweapon… well, I think the supposition speaks for itself that ALL of the healthcare and government agencies who were pushing for the WHOLE WORLD to be vaccinated would lose not only their credibility, but would also be accused of initiating the world’s WORST CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
 
That also brings me to the next point. What would all of the doctors and scientists get out of warning the public that these vaccines are dangerous?
 
They don’t get funding. They don’t get widespread publicity and airtime. (Other than on alternative platforms and independent podcasts and the like.) They don’t get recognition or kudos from the health industry for pointing out potential harmful effects in an effort to minimize as much damage and hurt that it can cause in innocent individuals – who have, in part, taken the injection in good faith (and/or because they were bribed, coerced, manipulated, forced in order to keep their job or to travel, visit their family…)
 
No. Instead, these healthcare workers/doctors/virologists/biologists/researchers get ridiculed, censored, banned, fired, smeared, etc., etc., etc. 
 
It would seem, that the doctors speaking out against the vaccines simply care about people’s well-being. They KNOW the dangers that these “vaccines” are presenting, and they are concerned and compassionate enough to spread awareness on these matters so the rest of us can be adequately informed and make smart decisions based on unfiltered, unpoliticized, ACCURATE information.
 
 
So I ask you, which “science” sounds more reasonable?
Those who are insisting that we MUST take the vaccines to “go back to normal” – while disregarding all evidence to the contrary? And claiming that safety and efficacy has been assured, yet ignoring the many, MANY reported side effects, deaths, blood clots, lung problems, etc. that are being caused by the “vaccines”?
 
And who, by the way, in an incredibly dishonest effort to reduce vaccine hesitancy, has been censoring people on social media from relating their personal testimonies on their own accounts. Which alone speaks VOLUMES about the “science” they want you to continue following, while simultaneously disallowing any other voice to be heard.
 
Not to mention, their very unethical and unprofessional advice told to health industries everywhere to do NOTHING, until it’s too late, and then try to do something – (which most likely involved putting the sick individual on a ventilator, which many doctors have stated actually worsens the state of the individual…), but ultimately everyone just needs to wait for these new, rushed, “miracle injections” that they keep saying will help us “return to normal” and stop the spread of the “virus”…
 
OR the numerous doctors/scientists/virologists/etc. who have presented actual data, information, confirmation, documents, etc. exposing the vaccines for what they are, without any political bias or funding, but just good and honest scientific research based on FACTS? And who have presented treatments available to help sick individuals deal with the symptoms without the need for the “vaccine” (which I should mention, the treatments are ALSO suppressed by the government/health agencies… ask yourself, why would government/health agencies try to prevent someone from receiving a treatment that doctors have proven WORKS?).
 
Keep in mind, many of these doctors have also announced that they would be more than happy to debate their points in a conference to those who keep peddling these unnecessary vaccine injections, but have yet had anyone from this side accept this incredibly important conversation.
 
Honestly, I think the answer speaks for itself. And until people come together and face the reality of what’s really going on, more and more people are going to needlessly be forever altered by a dangerous concoction that they don’t need, and they will unfortunately watch as more of their friends and family fall victim to the tragic side effects of this notorious pharmaceutical money-making machine and what seems to be a very deliberate agenda at efforts to sterilize/depopulate the world.
 
People are speaking up about this and giving us the truth of the matter. Now it’s up to us to listen and heed these messages and take action to protect our rights and freedom, and even our very lives and those of our loved ones.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."