Dr. Michael Yeadon (Former Pfizer Chief Scientist) Warns Pregnant Women of the Dangers of Taking The Experimental COVID Vaccine

Study on women showed “vaccine induced autoimmune attack, on their own placenta.”

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Chief Scientist and VP of the Allergy and Respiratory Unit of Pfizer, has been very outspoken in his assessment of these “vaccines”, and has called this agenda out several times for being deliberate crimes against humanity. The following video below is an explanation and warning to people – specifically for women who are pregnant or who are of child-bearing potential, to avoid these dangerous injections.

Source: bitchute | WHAT IS TRUTH?/WAS IST WAHRHEIT? |
3 THINGS WOMEN SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE COVID JAB – DR. MICHAEL YEADON

The following text is transcribed from the above video with some embellishment added for emphasis. All words are from Dr. Michael Yeadon.

“You’re being lied to. I’m being lied to. We’re not being treated like adults. And the authorities are not giving us full information about the, the risks of these products. And so I’m going to try and do a non-science presentation, um, because I really want to speak to you who are probably not scientists. You’ll be a lay audience. So I’m going to do my best.

So, uh, three things to tell you about my concerns about the impact of these vaccines in reproductive health, fertility and pregnancy.

The first thing, is so obvious, that you’ll agree with me when I tell you. And that’s, we never, EVER, give experimental medicines to pregnant women. Why do we not do that? Well, you’ll probably will have heard of the word ‘thalidomide’. 60 years ago, through, I think an ignorant failure of medicines regulation, we were more exposed to a new product for morning sickness called thalidomide. And it led to at least 10,000 birth malformations. And we didn’t know at the time, that the studies they were doing at the time simply wouldn’t pick out thalidomide as the actual toxin in the womb.

And I think it also taught us that babies are not safe and protected inside the uterus, which is what we used to think. But in fact, there are a miracle of minute development, critical stages, especially in the early stages, where if they interfered with biochemicals or something else, it can change the course of development to that child irreparably.

So that’s the thing to tell you. You never ever give, really inadequately tested medicines, medicinal products, to a pregnant woman. And that’s exactly what is happening. Our government is urging pregnant women, and women of child-bearing age, to get vaccinated. And they’re telling them they’re safe. And that’s a lie. Because those studies have simply not been done.

So reproductive toxicology has not been undertaken with any of these products. Certainly not a full battery of tests that you would want. So here we are, dosing potentially hundreds of millions of women of child-bearing potential, with products which are untested in terms of impacts on fertilization and development of a baby. That’s bad enough, because what that tells me is that there’s recklessness; no one cares. The authorities do not care what happens. But it’s much worse than that. And remember, I’m a toxicologist as well as a research scientist.

Two things to tell you.

The first only came to light because of a Freedom of Information request made by somebody to the Japanese medicines regulator. So the Japanese medicines regulator had required Pfizer to do a study where they looked at how the vaccine distributed around the body, in this case of a rat, over time. It’s a distribution pharmacokinetic study. And they were not required in America or Europe, because that’s not what you do with vaccines. Another – for another day. But the Japanese regulators required it.

Now I’ve seen a copy of that report, and I’m entirely able to read and interpret it. And to my horror, what we find is the vaccine doesn’t just distribute around the body and then wash out again. Which is what you hope. It concentrates in ovaries of rats. And it concentrates, at least, twenty-fold over the concentration in other background tissues like muscles.

Um, what’s it doing there? Well I don’t know. You don’t want this product in your ovaries. It’s simply not necessary to induce immunity to have a vaccine in your ovaries. And, as it’s concentrating in the ovaries, getting higher concentrations over time, they have not even defined what the maximum levels are or when that occurs.

So, so now we’ve got a second problem; that the vaccine, at least in rats, distributes in the ovaries. And I’ll tell you, a general rule of thumb in toxicology, is if you don’t have any data to counter contradict what you’ve learned, that’s the assumption you make for humans. So my assumption at the moment, is that’s what’s happening to every female who’s been given these vaccines. These vaccines are concentrating in her ovaries.

That’s very worrying. So we don’t know what that will do, but it cannot be benign. And it could be seriously harmful. Because the vaccines will then express the coronavirus spike protein and we know that there are unwanted biologies from that spike proteins. That’s the second one.

I’ve got another one now, and it’s even worse! Because it’s actually, this time an experiment in humans. In females.

I wrote with a German doctor 8 months ago, a petition to the European Medicines Agency. And amongst several concerns we had, one was that the spike protein is faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta. Something that’s absolutely required for both fertilization and formation and maintenance of the placenta. So you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way. And we noticed that the coronavirus spike protein is similar. Similar enough that I would worry.

And I wanted them to do some experiments, hopefully to rule out the possibility that when you vaccinate the person, who then makes spike proteins, and they develop an immune response against this spike protein; my worry was that there would be an echo. You know. A faint signal that would potentially bind this similar protein in the placenta. And the studies just came out a few weeks ago and it says, exactly, what I was worried about.

15 women were given Pfizer vaccines, they drew blood samples every few days, and they measured antibodies against the spike protein; which took several weeks to appear. They also measured antibodies against the placenta. And they found within the first 1-4 days an increase of two and a half to three times – a 300% increase, in the antibodies against their own placenta. In the first 4 days. Um, so, I’m sorry to say this, but that is a vaccine induced autoimmune attack, on their own placenta.

And I think you can only expect that that is happening in every woman of child-bearing potential, is generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy. Now, what the effect will be we can’t be certain. Again it can’t be benign. I don’t know whether it’s enough to cause first trimester losses. But I would think it would, because I’ve looked at the literature, and women who are unfortunate enough to have what are called autoimmune diseases, tend to have a higher rate of first trimester losses. And what this vaccine’s done is induced an autoimmune response.

So, I’m here to warn you that if you are of child-bearing potential, or younger – so, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines. Thank you.”

Thank you to Dr. Michael Yeadon for bringing this awareness and research to the forefront and warning people of the potential dangers to this COVID vaccine.

I also want to point out that most vaccine trials take 10-15 years, if not more, to determine safety and efficacy. Yet with the COVID vaccine, it was developed in 2 MONTHS since word of the outbreak hit (some sources are claiming it is because of the wonderful advancements being made in tech and the “stupendous foresight of the NIH” to predict a similar outbreak would happen… if that’s what you would like to believe…) and the clinical trials started soon after. With emergency authorized use only, NOT APPROVED, 9 months later.

With this in mind, even if it becomes “approved” – in which this little caveat has caused more drama and confusion than what was necessary – are we going to still continue to trust the FDA, the CDC, NIH, NIAID on these incredibly unnecessary vaccines, when we can now see the results of this rushed mRNA/spike protein experiment? Not to mention, there are treatment regiments available that are KNOWN to treat this illness, in which the EUA would not be required since under their own regulations they state:

“Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

Doctors have proven, IN COURT, that Ivermectin, an already approved medicine, works and nutraceutical bundles are beneficial in treating these respiratory syndromes. Yet they are being SUPPRESSED by the very health agencies that are promoting vaccines every where we turn, even though the vaccines are not approved and are causing thousands upon thousands of side effects and deaths.

Please do your research and use critical thinking and discernment. Doctors like Michael Yeadon get nothing from trying to save your life and help you (except censorship and ridicule from the mainstream media and big tech platforms) and shows genuine concern for our well-being. While pharmaceutical companies have gained BILLIONS from pushing these experimental vaccines onto the population.

Thank you again to all of the sincere doctors/scientists/healthcare workers/researchers who are bringing all of this information to light.

Roger Waters (of Pink Floyd) Calls Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram: “Insidious Movement”

Hero standing up against the establishment.

From a widely shared Twitter post made on June 11th 2021 by La Jornada, we can see Roger Waters at a “Free Julian Assange” event, THE PEOPLES FORUM, raising donations to bring awareness to his unfair imprisonment. In the background of the video, we can see the saying, “Journalism is not a crime – war crimes are.”

[NOTE: I did attempt to visit the site that is posted on the banner “standwithassangenewyork.org” but nothing shows up. There is, however, a twitter page similar to this name: StandWithAssangeNY | @AssanageNY]

Fittingly, Roger Waters took this opportunity to showcase his disdain for the monopolistic efforts of big tech to gain even more control over the population than they already have.

In the video below, Roger Waters reveals a request from Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram asking permission to use Pink Floyd’s song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” for their Instagram movie. Waters’ response to Zuckerberg is astounding, since he is one of a small few speaking out against social media censorship.

Roger Waters calling out Zuckerberg and Facebook/Instagram as a corrupt industry and refusing to be a part of their system:

“This is something that I actually put in my folder when I came out here today. You have no idea what it is. Nobody does. Because it arrived on the internet to me this morning. It’s a request for the rights to use my song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” in the making of a film to promote instagram. So it’s a missive… it’s a missive from Mark Zuckerberg to me, right? It arrived this morning. With an offer of a huge, huge amount of money. And the answer is: “F*ck you! No f*cking way!”

And I, I only mention that because this is an insidious, it’s the insidious movement of them to take over absolutely everything. You know? So those of us who do have any power, and I do have a little bit, in terms of the control of the publishing of my songs, I do anyway – So I will not be a party to this bullsh*t, Zuckerberg.

Roger Waters reading from the missive: “We want to thank you for considering this project. We feel that the core sentiment of this song is still so prevalent and necessary today, which speaks to how timeless a work [it is]” – it’s true.

And yet, they want to, they want to subjourn it; they want to use it, to make facebook and instagram even bigger and more powerful than it already is, so that it can continue to censor all of us in this room! And prevent this story about Julian Assange getting out to the general public, so the general public can go, “What?! What?” No! No more. Nada mas.”

“Zuckerberg features in my new rock and roll show. I’ve got him sitting – no, I shouldn’t tell you. But, but he does. But you think, how does this little prick, who started off saying, She’s pretty. We’ll give her a four out of five. She’s ugly, we’ll give her a one.”

How the f*ck did he get any power in anything? And yet, here he is, one of the most powerful idiots in the world.”

This is amazing. This is what the world needs more of, instead of people who are easily bought off and paid for, and who constantly bow their heads and do whatever the establishment tells them to do.

Roger Waters is a shining example of someone who stands up and defends the people, instead of falling in line and following the narrative. Even after being offered a substantial amount of money, Waters tells them, “not a chance”.

This is dignity, people. This is integrity. He is speaking out not only for himself, but for the rest of us; standing up against this tyrannical control and censorship. How many people have been deleted, banned, censored, simply for not following the main narrative? And how ironic, when the lyrics Zuckerberg and the big tech giants wants to use is, in part: “We don’t need no thought control.”

The nerve, right? A huge, totalitarian dictatorship, monitoring certain narratives across the platform, labeling numerous posts as “misinformation” and “this post is disputed”, and “due to what we deem as hate speech (which is anything that we don’t like), your account has been banned” has the audacity to want to use a song that was created to fight back against “thought control”.

It pretty much sums up what facebook, instagram, twitter and other huge tech platforms are all about. Their purpose to organize a large, oppressive “group think” to control the thoughts of others and anyone who dissents from their agenda gets ostracized, shunned, banned, etc.

Thankfully, there are still people who resist this corruption, even at the cost of further monetary gain and fame. Thank you so much to Roger Waters, for being the voice of reason and shutting down this huge oligarch’s attempts at abusing this song and exploiting its meaning. This is the action of a role model. Not the corrupted individuals who are trying to indoctrinate and condition the minds of the population.

One Final Note:

On the matter of Mr. Julian Assange, it’s also fascinating how instead of hailing whistleblowers exposing crimes as heroes, they are instead investigated and accused of crimes themselves, for obtaining materials “illegally” or for breaking NDAs.

Of course, where is the outrage for the ACTUAL CRIMINALS being exposed for their crimes? Why do the efforts of the media aim to smear the whistleblower instead of reporting on the atrocities being committed? And why should NDAs protect criminals or criminal activity? If a crime is being committed, that should make the NDA null and void. It would seem as if the NDA is there solely to protect any kind of criminal activity that may be perpetrated. A crime is still a crime, NDA or not. Any NDA issued that results in protecting illegal activity should be overthrown and cancelled.

It’s fascinating when telling the truth and exposing crimes is considered an even bigger crime than the crime itself. Perhaps it all boils down to who was initially committing the crime to begin with…

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”