Dr. Ariyana Discusses Nano-Biosensors/Nanorazors and Dr. Noack’s Death After He Located Graphene Hydroxide in the COVID Vaccine

Why is graphene oxide/hydroxide and rectangular objects found in the COVID vaccines?

Dr. Andreas Noack, the German doctor who was purported to have exposed graphene hydroxide in the vaccines, based on charts of the chemical composition of it (labeling his findings as “nano-razor blades”), has allegedly passed away very soon after the release of his bombshell video.

You can watch his presentation describing the graphene hydroxide here.

While the circumstances about his death is surrounded with suspicion and controversy, Dr. Ariyana Love claims to have been given proof of his death, with a personal invite to his funeral.

While it is hard to say what the truth is surrounding this matter, the dangers of the “vaccine” is irrefutable; causing untold amount of damage that has been seen both instantaneously, as well as a few days/weeks/months after its injection. Not to mention what may arise in the near to not-so-distant future.

It also brings up the question that if the vaccines contain all of these harmful substances, why are they in there? For what purpose? Many doctors and scientists are finding out that it has nothing to do with “COVID”. And while the conclusion may be something they have a difficult time coming to terms with, the evidence has to be looked at with a purely unbiased and thoroughly researched point of view. What are the facts? Who is initiating it? What are their agendas?

Dr. Ariyana Love delves a little bit more into these questions with her interview with Stew Peters.

The full transcript is available below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Stew Peters: “Well the magical new Omicron variant of coronavirus has, like clockwork, restarted this frenzy for lockdowns and restrictions all around the world.

The U.K. has vaccine passports now. In Austria, they’re seriously considering booting down doors, forcefully making entry into people’s dwellings and force jabbing them. Germany of course is locking down all unvaccinated people. In New York City, they’re requiring all children, ages 5 and up to get the jab if they want to go to restaurants or just about anywhere else.

Folks, remember, this is for a disease that children face statistically zero danger from. And which they’re largely incapable of even spreading.

But that’s the pattern that we’re in now. The left can’t come clean on the bioweapon, so they’re tripling down. They’re becoming more obsessed than ever with more shots in more arms. And you better believe, if the third dose doesn’t cut it, whatever their objective is, they’ll start mandating four and five, and more.

They’ll vaccinate newborns! They’ll vaccinate their pets, their dogs, their cats, they’ll water their house plants with these shots.

And that means, of course, that they’ll be more frenzied than ever about silencing anyone that shares dissenting viewpoints on these shots.

Dr. Ariyana Love of Finland has been one of our leading guests on the question of whether graphene oxide is in these vaccines. She’s recently shared some upsetting news with us. Dr. Andreas Noack, the German doctor who claims to have found microscopic nanorazors within a vaccine sample, has died. Just days after his most recent findings. What could the implications of his  sudden demise be.

Dr. Ariyana Love joins us now. Dr. Love, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “God bless you, Stew.”

Stew Peters: “So, when we speculated or you had mentioned that Dr. Noack had died, we heard, “No, that’s fake news. He’s still very much alive.” You’re now insisting, you can confirm that he’s dead? Just days after sharing/going public with the fact that he found these razorblades inside of these so-called safe and effective vaccines?

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Right. I received the personal invitation to his funeral. It had, you know, personal names, phone numbers, emails, personal contact information, and the location of his funeral. It’s real, he is deceased. Of course that’s not for public viewing, but I sent it over to your, to your staff.

Then a source on the ground in Austria called the hospital which con- who – that hospital confirmed that he is deceased. And he died there in the hospital. So, Dr. Noack is, is dead. There was an electrical outage that night, and the night that he blew the whistle, and this is poten- this is evidence of potentially directed energy weapons being used. So I wanted to just mention that.

And then on December 3rd, there was a video released anonymously of darkfield microscopy, showing the graphene hydroxide razor – nanorazor blades. And they were zoomed in all the way onto the individual razorblades; they look exactly like razorblades. It was dubbed in German, so it very well could be related to his work. Um, that’s ground-breaking. And of course the mainstream media is going to be silent.”

Video in question can be found at Dr. Ariyana Love’s website: LEAKED FOOTAGE: GRAPHENE HYDROXIDE NANO-RAZORBLADES – DARK FIELD MICROSCOPY

Translation of the German subtitles to English is offered below:

Anonymous source/Stew Peters Show

Spektakulare Aufnahmen aus dem Dunkelfeld

Spectacular Images from the Dark field

untersuchter impfstoff: BioNTech Pfizer

vaccine studied: BioNTech Pfizer

Die folgenden Aufnahmen entstanden unter einem Dunkelfeld Mikroskop…

the following images were taken under a dark field microscope…

Substanz: BioNTech Pfizer
Methode: Vorgeschriebene Aktivierung mit NaCL

Substance: BioNTech Pfizer
method: prescribed activation with NaCL

Kugelformige Blase
Viele davon in der Substanz sichtbar…

spherical bubble
many of them visible in the substance…

Mit einem handelsublichen Magneten sollte gepruft werden, ob sich magnetische Bestandteile in der Probe befinden…

with a commercial magnet it should be checked whether there are magnetic components in the sample…

Mit dem, was dann folgte, hat niemand gerechnet…

nobody expected what followed…

Achtung, jetzt kommt der Magnet an die Probe

attention, now the magnet comes to the sample

Hier noch mal…. …langsam…

here again…. …slow…

Nach diesem Ereignis flimmerte und schillerte es uberall.

After this event, it flickered and shimmered everywhere.

Aber dabei blieb es nicht…

But it didn’t stop there…

Die Blase hatte sich verandert… eine Art Schlauch hat sich gebildet

The bubble had changed… a kind of hose has formed

und etwas scheint heraus zu flieben

and something seems to fly out

Diese Bewegungen fanden ohne aubere Einwirkung statt

These movements took place without any external influence.

Zugabe von UV licht

Addition of UV light

Substanz: BioNTech Pfizer
Methode: Purer Impfstoff

Substance: BioNTech Pfizer
Method: Pure vaccine

Das Flimmern unter UV Licht

Flickering under UV light

Anomalien. Herkunft unbekannt…

Anomalies. Origin unknown…

Die Blasen hier sahen etwas anders aus

The bubbles here looked a little different

Das Flimmern in 1.250-facher Vergroberung

Flickering in 1,250-fold fermentation

Uberall sind rechteckige Objekte zu sehen

Rectangular objects can be seen everywhere

Was ist das?

What is that?

Wissen die Arzte, was sie den Menschen verabreichen?

Do doctors know what they are giving people?

Wissen die Menschen, was sie da bekommen?

Do people know what they are getting?

Jeder Mensch ist frei.

In Gedenken an alle, die dafur kampfen.

Everyone is free.

In memory of all those who fight for it.

Dr. Ariyana Love (cont. with Stew Peters): “All right. Then I’m going to share some things from the patents. This is Dr. Zandra Botha; remember she found those disc like nanostructures? [Stew Peters: “Yes, of course.”] Well those, in the patents, they’re – in the Pfizer patent it’s called “microbeads”. And in the Moderna, it was “microbubbles” and “microspheres”. They’re the same thing.

Image credited to Dr. Zandra Botha / Stew Peters Show

Dr. Ariyana Love (cont.): “Then Dr. Pablo Campra mentioned nano-biosensors. These are in the DARPA patent that names T shaped micro-fluidic biochips. So they are biochips.

Now I wanted to talk also about the quantum dots. Because this is very important. Moderna and Pfizer patents are using, they mention the quantum dots. These are made from graphene oxide as well. This is more proof that graphene oxide is in the shots.

So quantum dot is used for, get this, DNA barcoding, and ownership of humans. It’s branding using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The quantum dot patent application was granted on June 8th, 2021. Very recently. So they’ve been trying to hide this. They didn’t want it public.

All right. It’s a marker gene for bio-imaging and bio-tracking of humans. The quantum dots are color based markers. They’re tiny artificial atoms that are created chemically in a lab.”

Stew Peters: “Who’s behind this patent, by the way?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Well, I’m going to get into that in just a second.” [Stew Peters: “All right.”]

They’re fusing two atoms together. Get this, this is mind blowing, it’s like total sci-fi. They’re fusing two atoms together to create an artificial molecule. Um, so they have take – they have created a new programmable matter, that can be reprogrammed anytime, and controlled externally from A.I.

Now they are – so this is like playing gods, and altering God’s creation, and creating a whole new reality.

Now these quantum dots, they are – they have luciferase, which is insect DNA, jellyfish DNA, glowworm DNA, those are all being transfected into human cells for tracing and barcoding. This is cross-species genomics. They’re creating a new species from humans.

This technology was developed at the University of – sorry, at the Hebrew University in occupied Jerusalem. This technology is patented and owned by Yissum, a technology transfer company of the Hebrew University, and owned by Nanosys, which is headquartered in Silicon Valley, California. These two companies are sublicing [sic] the technology worldwide. So there’s sixty additional quantum dot patents that don’t expire until 2030.

Yissum business partners include Boston Scientific, Google, ICL, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Microsoft, Novartis, and many more. Samsung has also partnered with Nanosys.

Moderna’s patents are owned by Israel. Pfizer’s patents are owned by Israel. Their CEOs are both Israeli. So who’s your daddy? Right? These are – these are the patent holders. They have the vested interest in barcoding and enslaving humanity, and branding humans like cattle.

So, based on the patents, we know that they’re going to – what they’re going to use this technology for, and why they need it in you. And either by injection, masks, nasal swabs, hand sanitizer, or aerial spraying.

Now Klaus Schwab said that the hydrogels would be in everything by the end of the year. That’s now. The hydrogels are made from graphene oxide. They contain the entire weapons system. The mRNA cloning technology.

Fauci and the NIH funded the hydrogels, which are skin-penetrating, and can be disseminated by aerial spraying; Infowars covered this. They are literally saturating human beings with the hydrogels for – to genetically modify them for patent ability.

This is the Israeli state, CCP, Chinese Communist Party, the “elites”, and the “elites” and many more. You know, they want to monitor our biometric data in order to know who is they’re eligible property. And who isn’t yet. And they want everyone barcoded.

Stew Peters: “So um, there’s no escaping this, is what you’re saying? In other words, if I choose not to go and get this shot, which I absolutely am choosing not to do, they’re going to have to kill me. They’re not going to give me the shot. Same goes for my kids. But I’m not going to escape it because it’s in the air? It’s – it’s sprayable? And it’s, it’s in everything else that penetrates my skin? So no matter what, I’m going to get this computing system? This, this barcode? I’m going to be trackable and traceable?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Yeah, that’s what it appears to be. But there’s hope. I mean, there is – there are, there is a supplement that can repair and restore damaged DNA. It can turn genes back on; to what extent I don’t know. But it’s reversing the coagulation cascade within minutes.

 

There is hope for people, there’s hope for people who are vaxxed. We have to continue to detoxify and stay on a protocol that works with our body to give us the defense we need. So there are substances that exist and I’m helping people with that.”

Stew Peters: “All right. Do you want to give any information as to where people can find any of this stuff?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Yeah, my email is metanutrients@mailfence.com. That’s meta – metanutrients. And I can give that email to you. You can put it in the show notes.”

Stew Peters: “Yeah, uh, I – you know, listen, I don’t like blackpilling, I don’t like saying that things are hopeless, but you’re saying that they’re not hopeless. Right? That people – “

Dr. Ariyana Love: “They’re not hopeless. We’ve got microscop- I’m working with doctors worldwide. Okay? These are frontline doctors, these are people at the top of their career- their field. And we are getting results. Some doctors are getting results when they use the natural protocols. Um, and so I’m guiding people to those, and I’m still researching all the time. We’ve got microscopy- “

Stew Peters: “Yeah, because we’re not gonna give up. We’re on team God, we’re on team Jesus, we win. We know that. The good book says that. We know how the book ends. We’re on the right team. So we’re not going to give up. We’re gonna fight this thing like hell, until the absolute very end. And in Jesus’ name, we are going to win this.

I mean, this is, this is not going to happen. Our kids are not going to be ownable property by any government anywhere. Um, our kids are children of God. That’s who they belong to.

Dr. Ariyana Love, thank you so much for coming today. We appreciate it.”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Thank you, God bless you Stew.”

Stew Peters: “God bless you.”

With Dr. Ariyana’s research and conclusion pointing to a technological conversion of humankind with artificial intelligence and a new created species, I have to bring up once again Craig Venter’s work in this field.

Craig Venter is one of the most leading scientists/researchers of the Human Genome Project, and who, along with his team, was among the first to transfect a cell with a synthetic chromosome.

He also has collaborations/affiliations with Francis Collins of the NIH, and Eric Landers of the Human Genome Project (and who is also currently the President’s Science Advisor and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy).

A key quote from Craig Venter that pertains very well to the subject at hand:

“It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.”

Craig Venter (2010)

I wish these were all just sci-fi and conspiracy theories. But these individuals/organizations have something far more nefarious planned than “saving lives” and simply “helping us” track our medical/health records. We just need to realize it, and then make the right choice for ourselves and our family.

Stay strong, and God bless you all.

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Agenda of the Human Genome Project: ” – for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.”

Playing God in Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life
– [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837218/ ]

Thanks to a pingback post by the following site: There Is No Pandemic, it led me to a very interesting video featuring a Mr. Craig Venter, delving into an incredibly topical subject – even though the video was made in 2010.

Don’t think synthetic life-forms are possible in vaccines? Or that there’s even an agenda to do this?

Craig Venter, genetic researcher for the NIH and the Human Genome Project, would tell you otherwise…

“operating system”

“all the characteristics of the first species disappear”

“new species emerges from this software”

“making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques”

Click image for archived video. Original source can be found here: [ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/20/craig-venter-synthetic-life-form ]
“Craig Venter creates synthetic life form”
Full transcript. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Craig Venter: “Well this has been about a 15 year process. It started back in 1995, when we sequenced the first two genomes in history. Including the smallest genome, that of mycoplasma genitalium. And we set out a goal to try and understand what the smallest genome you can have as an operating system, to try and understand the basic components of life. It’s taken us through this long journey. Much longer than we ever anticipated. But that’s what happens when you enter into areas that nobody’s ever been before.

So at first we had to learn how to write the genetic code to synthesize pieces. Because the largest piece that ever has been synthesized other than our work has been only 30,000 letters. The first chromosome we were trying to make was over 500,000. And the one that we ultimately made and report in this paper is over 1,000,000 letters of genetic code. And we start with 4 bottles of chemicals, and the computer code in the computer, the digital code in the computer from DNA sequence. So, just learning how to do the synthesis was mastering a lot of chemistry that has never been done before. And we learned sequentially over the years how to build larger and larger molecules.

In 2003 we reported making a 5,000 letter bacterial virus, 5X174, and how to error correct the pieces. So, we start with pieces of DNA coming off DNA synthesizers; they’re only about 50-80 letters long. That’s pretty much the limit of what you can make with a chemical synthesizer. So everything we make from that has to be putting these little pieces together. Much like having a box of legos and having to assemble them back in the right order to get what you started with. So it’s been progressive over this entire time period. We thought we would have this almost 3 years ago. But we kept running into very significant biological roadblocks.”

Interviewer: “All right. And what do you ultimately hope to do with a method like this?

Craig Venter: “Well, this is an important step, we think, both scientifically and philosophically. It certainly changed my views of definitions of life and how life works. It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.

When we look at life forms we see them as sort of fixed entities. But this shows, in fact how dynamic they are. That they change from second to second. And that life is basically a result of an information process, a software process. Our genetic code is our software. And our cells are dynamically constantly reading that genetic code, making new proteins, the proteins make the other cellular components, and that’s what we see. But it’s hard to imagine how dynamic it is until we found, simply by replacing the software, it started making a whole new cell, whatever is defined by that software. So that’s, that’s a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.

Also this is now the first time where we’ve started with information in the computer, built that software molecule, now over a million letters of genetic code, put that into a recipient cell, and have this process start where that information converted that cell into a new species. So this becomes a very powerful tool for trying to design what we want biology to do.

As leaders of competing genome projects, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and J. Craig Venter, president of Celera Genomics, were recognized, correctly, as the two most important players in the worldwide effort to spell out the 3 billion “letters” of the human genome–the biochemical recipe, encoded in our DNA, for manufacturing and operating a complete human being.

[ https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,998842,00.html ]

We have a wide range of applications, so at the biotech company that funded the synthetic genomics that Ham Smith and I started a few years back, we have a major deal with ExxonMobil to try and use algae to capture carbon dioxide and make new hydrocarbons that can go into the Exxon refineries. To try and replace taking the oil out of the ground.

There’s no natural algaes that we know that can do this at the scale it’s needed. So we’re going to have to use our synthetic genomic techniques to either heavily modify existing algaes or develop whole new ones from scratch that have all the parameters that we want. These same tools, these same processes can be used for making chemicals, for making food substances, we hope for cleaning up water.

But perhaps the most important immediate application is we’re already working at the Venter Institute and working with Novartis to try and make new vaccines very quickly; we think we can shorten the process by 99% for making the flu vaccine each year by using these new synthetic techniques. But I think it’s going to be one of those situations I tell audiences I talk to that ‘we’re entering a new era we’re limited mostly by our imaginations’.”

Interviewer: “Could you ever use a method like this with a higher organism? Something more complex than bacteria?

Craig Venter: “Well, it’s certainly not in the immediate future. Bacteria have much more simplified genetic systems. They don’t have the same complex regulation that higher organisms have. But there are a number of single cell eukaryotes.

So we’re eukaryotes because we have a nucleus, I think one of the key things we mastered with our studies, particularly since 2003, and we reported the latest results a few months ago in Science at the end of last year, is we can move chromosomes across the branches of life. So we can move from bacteria into eukaryotes, we use yeast for all these processes. We can take the chromosomes out of yeast and move them back into bacteria to create new life forms.

So a next step would be try to make a simplified eukaryote. Yeast is very key for bio-manufacturing, for ethanol production, etc. And if we can have even a more efficient yeast cell, and at the same time, try and understand all its components, I think we’ll be able to make synthetic eukaryotes. Higher animals, multi-cellular systems are, I think, projects for the much more distant future.”

Interviewer: “Actually I have a couple more questions. Just about how we distinguish between any sort of synthetically – organisms with synthetic genomes versus the natural ones? One question I guess would be about containment.”

[Interview cuts out a section]

Craig Venter: ” – we were when we first started down this process, what could be an artifact that could fool us into thinking we had created synthetic life, when in fact it was just a contaminate of the native chromosome? And, where would even a single molecule of native chromosome could fool us into thinking we had created a new cell?

So early on we started designing a process of putting watermarks in the genetic code. We did this in the first chromosome we reported two years ago, basically all of us that helped build the genetic code signed the DNA, coded our names into the chromosome.

With this genome we’ve gone a little bit further; we’ve put 4 major watermarks in. We’ve developed a new code for writing English language, other languages, with punctuation and numbers into the genetic code. In the first watermark we actually have this code that needs to be decoded for people to read the rest. We even have a website built into the genetic code that if people solve it they can let us know that they’ve been able to read it.

“- and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”Revelation 13:17

All the authors of this study over the… certainly the last decade, our names are all encoded in this first genome. And we have three quotations built in there of adding a little philosophy to the genetic code at the same time. Which I think the chance of finding any of these in a naturally occurring genome is about as close to zero as you can get. So we can absolutely prove from the genetic changes, that we’ve been built in to the design of the chromosomes that it’s unquestionably the synthetic DNA that we made, not some natural contaminant.

A containment, that’s a really critical issue, and it’s one of the most important issues to us, and one of the number one questions I get asked in all my litera- all my lectures around the globe. And when we look at molecular biology for the last several decades, we all use e. coli in the laboratory, that genes from multiple species have been put in it over the years – probably tens of millions of experiments. And there’s not been a single accident. And the reason for that is that e. coli has a chemical dependency for growing in the laboratory.

So these are things we can start to build in to the design of synthetic genomes, we can build in suicide genes so they can’t escape. And so we can use artificial amino acids. There’s a number of approaches that we’re developing and other labs are developing to guarantee absolute containment.

And this first proof of principle, we’ve largely copied the mycoides genome, because as a control, if we couldn’t boot up something that was already known, we could never get to the design phase. We deleted 14 genes from this genome, and made all these other genetic modifications. This cell only grows on extremely rich [media(sp?)] on the laboratory.

The only other place it goes, the mycoides genome is a minor goat pathogen that causes mastitis in goats. We think we’ve eliminated the genes associated with that, but it will not grow outside of the laboratory unless it’s deliberately injected or sprayed into a goat. So, we don’t work with goats, so we think we have pretty good containment systems in the lab.

There’s selectable markers that’s dependent on a specific antibiotic. So these are early attempts, I think. These containment approaches would get far more sophisticated with the next versions of what we and others do.”

Interviewer: “All right. Well, are there any final points you’d like to make before we close?”

Craig Venter: “Well, this is the first synthetic cell that’s been made and we call it synthetic because the cell is totally derived from a synthetic chromosome made from 4 bottles of chemicals on a chemical synthesizer. Starting with information in the computer.

Before we did these experiments starting back in the late 90’s, we asked for a complete bioethical review, knowing we were going into uncharted territory, trying to create new species. The review group at the University of Pennsylvania published the results in Science in 1999. Since then there’s been lots of different review processes around the world. The Sloan Foundation funded my institute, the Venter Institute, along with MIT, and a Washington think tank, to look at the security issues concerning this. That report was published and can be downloaded from JCVI.org.

There’s been ongoing discussions in the U.S. government, in the E.U., the National Academy of Sciences has done reports on this. So I think this is the first incidence in science where the extensive bioethical review took place before the experiments were done. And it’s part of an ongoing process that we’ve been driving, trying to make sure that the science proceeds in an ethical fashion, that we’re being thoughtful about what we do, and looking forward to the implications to the future.”

End of transcript.

So here is undeniable proof, that the folks at the NIH and Human Genome Project have been trying to synthesize organisms for the sole purpose of creating new species/life forms, and using these techniques for vaccines, AND states that these synthetic substances WILL CHANGE DNA.

It all ties back to the NIH and the HUMAN GENOME PROJECT. The theory that the COVID vaccines are an attempt at a worldwide genome experiment project is becoming clearer every single day, backed up with all of the data that has come forward, backed up with all of the studies pointing to this very agenda, backed up with countless interviews, positions and documentations of the likes of Anthony Fauci, Christine Grady, Bill Gates, Craig Venter, Eric Lander, Klaus Schwab, Francis Collins, their institutes and cohorts GAVI, WEF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Human Genome Project, World Health Organization, United Nations, MIT, Harvard, etc., etc., etc.

“Venter and colleagues published their paper about creating a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome in the journal Science in May 2010.

“Some of you are asking, why do this? It’s great basic science, but there are some more compelling reasons,” he said, noting that synthetic DNA can be used to develop genomics-based vaccines.

“The National Institutes of Health has funded my institute to create synthetic pieces of every known flu virus, so anytime we need a new vaccine, we can just take these pieces off the shelf, and go through the assembly and have flu vaccine stocks in a very short time,” he said. “In the next year or two, you might get the first synthetic DNA vaccines.”

Web archive version: Synthetic life forms can produce vaccines, gobble up CO2 and more, says expert

Although the below excerpt specifies “intranasal”, there are also endeavors of injectable live attenuated vaccines as well:

“The company’s breakthrough Synthetic Attenuated Virus Engineering (SAVE) platform utilizes a computer algorithm to recode the genomes of viruses and construct live-attenuated vaccines to prevent viral infections or treat solid tumors.”

Web archive version: Codagenix and Serum Institute of India Announce Commencement of First-in-Human Trial of COVI-VAC, A Single Dose, Intranasal Live Attenuated Vaccine for COVID-19

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16778323/ ] “Genetically modified live attenuated parasites as vaccines for leishmaniasis” (2006)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620583/ ] “Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine” (2017)

[ https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/investigational-malaria-vaccine-gives-strong-lasting-protection ] “Investigational Malaria Vaccine Gives Strong, Lasting Protection” (2021)“The vaccine combines live parasites with either of two widely used antimalarial drugs—an approach termed chemoprophylaxis vaccination.”

Now, with all of that being said, and with this outright admission by Craig Venter about their agenda, I have to bring up one of Richard Fleming’s latest criticism of ALL the doctors that have claimed to find what seems to be graphene oxide, nanobots, and/or parasitic-like organisms in the vaccines.

Firstly, this should have been approached in a more scientific approach to researching the vaccine’s contents.

While the other doctors are investigating these vaccines and are questioning its contents, even inviting other scientists and researchers to help them identify what these substances are, Dr. Fleming is undermining their research and dismissing their conclusions. Even implying, at one point, the mention of “credentials” as to whether or not to take one seriously.

Secondly… isn’t that precisely why we’re in the mess we’re in right now? Because SO many people decided to trust the likes of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins? Does it matter how many so-called credentials one has to determine their sincerity and integrity or even professionalism? Doesn’t look like it to me. As long as a researcher is honest and looking for the truth, I will take their word over an overpaid “expert” any day. Especially ones who conduct inhumane, atrocious experiments on other living beings.

Then, of course, when addressing anything in a scientific approach, and certainly before reaching concrete conclusions and dismissing any other research (like the fraudulent Lancet paper did, for example…) one must consider ALL variables. Take the following for consideration:

how many vials total did Richard Fleming test?

were they from the same batch, or all different batches? Different brands, or all the same brand?

were all these vials from the same country? – it is becoming more and more apparent that different countries are getting different doses/batches

at what magnification did Fleming conduct his tests compared to all of the other doctors/scientists?

are we considering that some batches/doses will contain certain substances while others consist of saline solutions only – as what has already been theorized?

if different countries are getting different batches, there is a chance that there will be different substances for each country – to perhaps test a wider set of material/organisms and/or to target certain people’s DNA/ethnicity/etc.?

what is the “garbage” and “debris” that Fleming is referencing? “Garbage” has to be something. Was there an attempt to identify these compositions? Or just label them all with the term “debris” and “garbage”?

Fleming also mentions the term “crystalline” on more than one occasion… does he realize that there are indeed nanocrystal-graphene hybrid material that has been synthesized? Does he know every possible thing that can be synthesized or genetically modified using either Venter’s DNA genetic modification technique or the CRISPR technology?

“Nanocrystal-graphene have been proposed as a new kind of promising hybrid for a wide range of application areas including catalysts, electronics, sensors, biomedicine, and energy storage, etc. Although a variety of methods have been developed for the preparation of hybrids, a facile and general synthetic approach is still highly required.”

“A rich library of highly crystalline nanocrystals, with types including noble metal, metal oxide, magnetic material and semiconductor were successfully grown on chemically converted graphene (CCG), which is simultaneously reduced from GO during the synthesis.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22699842/ ] “Generalized syntheses of nanocrystal-graphene hybrids in high-boiling-point organic solvents”

Is Mr. Fleming aware of all the technological and biological advancements and agendas in the arena of nanotechnology in combination with virus-based particles?

“Genetically modified viruses offer a general route for the production of materials with complex nanoscale detail, for use either directly or as templates. It appears likely that modified viruses will feature prominently in the nanotechnology of the immediate future. The possible commercial exploitation of virus-templated materials includes nanowires, high surface area materials for battery electrodes, detectors, catalytic material, light harvesting devices, quantum dots, and tunable photonic devices.”

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9783527671403.hlc094 ] “7 Virus Particle-Based Liquid Crystals”

Will Mr. Fleming attempt to identify these so-called “garbage” and “debris” and conduct further studies with a higher magnification, or continue to shoot down other’s legitimate attempts at trying to figure out exactly what these particles are? Notice he never tries to identify what ANYTHING in the vaccine is, other than mentioning “lipid nanoparticles”. Only giving his opinion of what it’s not.

And with all of the evidence showing that genetically modified organisms is not only highly probable but also incredibly likely, considering the NIH’s many, many, MANY horrific experiments and crimes against humanity (and animal life), and Craig Venter’s ventures, not to mention Bill Gates’ very own admission and extensive funding in this matter, I am ultimately left questioning Fleming’s motives.

Bill Gates: “You know, is there something to worry about with medicines, that is might – some of them might have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean and we’re taking things that are… you know, genetically modified organisms and we’re injecting them in little kids arms. We just shoot them right into the vein.”

Bottom line: yes, these vaccines are extremely dangerous. And if the ones in control of pushing these worldwide vaccines are also in control of the Human Genome Project and attempts at re-writing our DNA, our best bet would be to avoid these at all costs and address these as the crimes they are.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

VMAT2 “God Gene” Has Been Studied Extensively Throughout the Years – And is Being Used in CRISPR Studies/Vaccines

According to studies, scientists can manipulate and “tightly experimentally tune” our level of spirituality.

As word of the vaccines affecting our spirituality and “God gene” spreads, it’s prudent to investigate these claims even deeper, as it involves our own human mind, body and soul . While some theories have been speculated upon, the studies and research that have been published throughout the years bears an extremely uncanny (if not direct) resemblance into the events that are going on around us, and have been for decades.

With that being said, here are some interesting correlations of the VMAT2 gene specifically, for further consideration. I will be selecting some excerpts from published medical reports, studies, documents and citing their sources to show an eerie connection to what may be going on today.

Quarterly FunVax Review

These documents were found from the following website: FunVax: Fundamentalist Vaccine
Pentagon Video, Document Reveal Aerial Vaccination Plan
as a pdf format, that can be found here (unless removed…): [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf ]

The article that these documents were made available questions the authenticity and proposes that there is the possibility that it could be a fake/hoax. However, they also suggest that it is likely that it isn’t, citing numerous sources on the validity of such a project. It’s also interesting to consider that the linked article was allegedly originally created 10 years ago, in September of 2011. And as we’ll see throughout further sections of this post, as well as additional notes giving credence to these concepts, there are NUMEROUS studies involving the VMAT2 gene, proving that this has been worked on extensively throughout the years.

Here are some screenshots and excerpts of the documents in question. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis:

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / page 1]

The objective of this phase of project ID 149AZ2 is to prepare a viral vector that will inhibit/decrease the expression of VMAT2 within a human population. Currently, tests are only scheduled for animal models. Infection of Rhesus Monkey, according to the timeline set out in Appendix 1, will begin as early as 07/02/07. A clinical team coordinated by [redacted] of [redacted] will be brought in to supervise the experiments once Rhesus Monkeys are being exposed to virus. The timeline for human trials and field tests will be determined by [redacted], and the role of the research group will be as support only. Upscale of the virus will be handled by [redacted]. The coordination between the research, clinical and manufacturing groups is outline in a report due on 06/15/07 and is in the process of being prepared by [redacted].”

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / page 3]

“Airborne VSV Containing VMAT2 Disruption Gene

Abstract – Because of the vesicular stomatitis virus’ ability to infect brain cells and its two step life cycle, cytolytic infections in mammals and transmission by insects, it provided a starting point to design an airborne virus that has the ability to infect the respiratory system as well as brain cells. The newly designed virus contains the typical VSV genome, a homologous region to VMAT2 and a gene from adenovirus that allows attachment to the coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) on host cells. This design allows the virus to infect the respiratory track where cytolytic infection occurs and then subsequent diffusion across the blood brain barrier to infect brain cells. 600 strains of the virus were tested in duplicate on 1,200 mice. Mice were inoculated via needle and brains tissue examined three weeks after inoculation. VSV287 had the least amount of endogenous VMAT2 protein and will be further tested to verify that it is the most efficient of the 600 strains.”

Noteworthy mentions of some of the terminology:

“Vesicular stomatitis virus”[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26605499/ ] “Characterization of the glycoproteins of bat-derived influenza viruses” (2016)

Recently found bat-derived influenza viruses (BatIVs) have hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) gene segments distinct from those of previously known influenza A viruses. However, pathogenicities of these BatIVs remain unknown since infectious virus strains have not been isolated yet. To gain insight into the biological properties of BatIVs, we generated vesicular stomatitis viruses (VSVs) pseudotyped with the BatIV HA and NA. We found that VSVs pseudotyped with BatIV HAs and NAs efficiently infected particular bat cell lines but not those derived from primates, and that proteolytic cleavage with a trypsin-like protease was necessary for HA-mediated virus entry.”

“(HA) Hemagglutinin”What is Hemagglutination?

Hemagglutination is a reaction that causes clumping of red blood cells in presence of some enveloped viruses, such as the influenza virus. A glycoprotein on the viral surface, namely hemagglutinin, interacts with red blood cells, leading to the clumping of red blood cells and the formation of a lattice.”

“(NA) Neuraminidase” – [ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28356530/ ] “Role of Neuraminidase in Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Receptor Binding” (2017)

“Typically, the HA is responsible for binding to the sialic acid to allow virus internalization and the NA is a sialidase responsible for cleaving sialic acid to aid virus spread and release.”

The interaction of influenza A virus glycoproteins with cell surface receptors is a major determinant of infectivity and therefore transmissibility. Understanding these interactions is important for understanding which factors are necessary to determine pandemic potential.

“Coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR)” – [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926969/ ] “Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is a modifier of cardiac conduction and arrhythmia vulnerability in the setting of myocardial ischemia” (2013)

“A heritable component in risk for ventricular fibrillation (VF) during myocardial infarction (MI) has been well established. A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) for VF during acute MI has led to the identification of a locus on chromosome 21q21 (rs2824292) in the vicinity of the CXADR gene. CXADR encodes the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR), a cell adhesion molecule predominantly located at intercalated discs of the cardiomyocyte.

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a frequent and potentially lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI). In this setting, VF is the consequence of disturbed electrical properties of the ischemic myocardium, which includes a decrease in cardiomyocyte excitability and cell-to-cell coupling. These factors result in conduction slowing of the cardiac electrical impulse, which is a prerequisite for the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias such as VF in MI.

CAR has been recognized primarily for its involvement in virus-mediated myocarditis”

Continuing on with the Quarterly FunVax Review documents:

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / page 3]

“Dispersal Options of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus

“Six methods of vesicular stomatitis virus dispersal were tested – high altitude release, water supply release, insect transmission, diffusion by a ground level object such as a car, diffusion from a stationary object such as a bottle and infection of food supply such as cattle or produce.”

Some possible connections to the above proposed “dispersal methods” of the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus:

High altitude release: chemtrails/contrails – with the pretense of protecting the world from climate change/global warming

Chemtrails Real Purpose And There’s Nothing You Can Do
Rosalind Peterson Talks Chemtrails & Geoengineering

Water supply release:

FARM FATALE | Shocking cover-up behind Dark Waters chemical leaks which left cows with GREEN organs and 99% of Americans infected
There’s Poison in the Tap Water. The Government Must Act.

Insect transmission: under the pretense of reducing insect species/population (allegedly to lower the chances of infectious disease spread…)

[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3269423/ ] “Science, Regulation, and Precedent for Genetically Modified Insects”
Why Are Gates and Pentagon Releasing GMO Mosquitoes in Florida Keys?

Infection of food supply such as cattle or produce:

Why Is Bill Gates (And China) Buying America’s Farmland?
GMO Dangers: Facts You Need to Know

While the Quarterly FunVax Review document was allegedly created in 2007, stating that the proposed dispersal methods above were already tested, we would be remiss if we didn’t realize that these studies would be ongoing and have been conducted in subsequent years to the present.

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / page 4]

“VMAT2 Rhesus Monkey KO

“Abstract – VMAT2 homozygous knockout monkeys die within three days while the heterozygous monkey lives what appears to be a normal life span. VMAT2 is responsible for packaging dopamine and other monoamines into vesicles that will be released at the synapse. Dopamine disruption has been shown to damage dopamine neurons. While the KO monkeys were alive, they did not feed and upon the autopsy it was concluded that they died of starvation. It appears that they had no will to live.”

“Research Group Meeting 03/21/07
Topics that were discussed

– Current update on experiments in progress, round table
– VSV287, [redacted]
– Review of timeline, [redacted]
Proposal for a suicide gene, [redacted]
– Dispersal Methods, [redacted]
– Testing efficiency in the field, [redacted]
Inhibitors that may target a specific population, [redacted]
– Monkey knockout/knockdown progess, [redacted]
Future experiments, [redacted]

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / page 5]

“Summary of Recommendation

1. Quantitative PCR of all 600 animal subjects should be done to ensure that the data from the ELISA experiments, which showed a decrease in endogenous VMAT2 is occurring because of viral insertion and not natural variation.

2. Of the 600 variants of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus tested, VSV287 had the greatest decrease of endogenous VMAT2 within mice. However, this may not be the case for human subjects. All 600 strains of VSV should be retested on human subjects by the clinical group. The clinical group should be involved with this ASAP.

3. Bradford assays should be done on infected subjects to determine endogenous VMAT2 concentrations before and after infection, not just after infection.

4. Mice or other subjects should not be injected with virus since this does not test the actual dispersal method. Future experiments of VSV287 or similar strains should allow the subject to breath in the virus rather than being injected with it.

5. The use of FunVax could see an immediate effect within the target zones and a way to measure the rate of infection should be examined and tested before the virus is released. Two or three of the following methods should be used to approximate efficiency. The results of the mass inoculation should be proportionate to the rate of infection and could be quantitated by either behavior or biological tests.

Behavior Indicators

a. Significant decrease in suicide bombings.

b. Decrease in armed resistance in conflict zones.

c. In non-conflict zones effectiveness could be measured by a decrease in people attending religious activities such as khutbahs or noon prayer.

d. Measureable increase in communications, telephone, email, and other forms of communication that express discontent with religion or God.

Screenshot taken from [ https://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf / pages 8&9]

“3. Based on the findings by [redacted] VSV287 has been shown to be safe with minimal serious side effects and has accomplished 8 of the 9 bench marks laid out in the “Summary of FunVax Objectives” including the two most important objectives at this stage –

a. An airborne virus that can insert a modified VMAT2 gene into brain cells.
b. a significant decrease of expression of endogenous VMAT2.

Only human trails [trials] can determine VSV287’s effect on religiosity and spirituality.

4. Dispersal methods are still being tested. High atmospheric dispersal or dispersal by ground level moving objects appear to be the most practical. Test will be conducted using VSV287. Once initial dispersal is accomplished infection will be transmitted person to person. The clinical group will examine the rates of person to person transmission.

Brief timeline (those within the same year may not be in ascending order) of some suspicious events that may have led to these studies:

1917Rudolf Steiner predicts vaccines that will remove spirituality from individuals

2004 – Dean Hamer proposes the God Gene theory in his book: “The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired Into Our Genes”

2005FunVax Pentagon footage (allegedly created in 2005) at a Pentagon/DOD conference

2007 – Quarterly FunVax Review Documents were allegedly created

2007 – CRISPR technology became more well-known: “CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat) sequences were initially discovered in the E. coli genome in 1987, but their function as a safeguard against bacteriophages was not elucidated until 2007”
[ https://www.addgene.org/crispr/history/ ]

2011 – Joey Lombardi purportedly leaked the Pentagon video discussing reducing “religious fanaticism” in the Middle East using a respiratory illness.

2012 – MERS Outbreak (“Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is an illness caused by a virus (more specifically, a coronavirus) called Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Most MERS patients developed severe respiratory illness with symptoms of fever, cough and shortness of breath. About 3 or 4 out of every 10 patients reported with MERS have died.”
[ https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/about/index.html ]

2012 – “George Church, Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and Feng Zhang discovered that by designing guide RNA to target a specific region in the genome, “the CRISPR-Cas9 system can be used as a “cut-and-paste” tool to modify genomes. As a DNA-editing tool, CRISPR-Cas9 can remove or introduce new genes as well as silence or activate genes.”
[ https://bitesizebio.com/47927/history-crispr/ ]

2012 – clip from the FunVax Documentary was released on youtube with Dean Hamer (of the National Institutes of Health) and the FunVax scientist speaking on the validity of removing “spirituality/religiosity” in individuals through the VMAT2 gene.
[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPyWZ4dbVQc ]

2019-ongoing – “COVID”, a coronavirus/respiratory illness, hits at the tail-end of 2019 and has upended the way of life we once knew. Perhaps setting the stage for…

2020 – Study of a “Double-Barreled CRISPR Technology as a Novel Treatment Strategy For COVID-19”: “over 200 vaccines are being tested in preclinical stage or in different stages of clinical trials worldwide.” / “In addition to DNA-targeting Cas9, the RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas13 has also been successfully demonstrated as an antiviral strategy against single-strand RNA viruses such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), influenza A virus (IAV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in human cells.”
[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469881/ ]

2021 – Worldwide efforts to vaccinate everyone on the planet with the use of mRNA/DNA vaccines, even though there are already effective treatments, and the fact that natural immunity is far-superior than vaccines.

Some key takeaways from the contents of this post:

Is CRISPR being used/studied to create vaccines? | YES
[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102830/ ] “CRISPR/Cas System: A Potential Technology for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19 and Emerging Infectious Diseases” (2021)

Biological tools based on CRISPR/Cas systems have been widely used in biomedicine. In particular, they are advantageous in pathogen detection, clinical antiviral therapy, drug, and vaccine development.”

Are VSV vectors being used/studied to create vaccines? | YES
[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31368826/ ] ” Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus vector vaccines for WHO blueprint priority pathogens” (2019)

“The vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has been established as a robust vaccine vector backbone for infectious diseases for well over a decade.”

Are VSV vectors being used/studied with the use of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology? | YES
[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30195783/ ] “VSV-G-Enveloped Vesicles for Traceless Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ” (2018)

“The method of delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 into target cells is a strong determinant of efficacy and specificity in genome editing. Even though high efficiency of Cas9 delivery is necessary for optimal editing, its long-term and high levels of expression correlate with increased off-target activity. We developed vesicles (VEsiCas) carrying CRISPR-SpCas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) that are efficiently delivered into target cells through the fusogenic glycoprotein of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G).

Has the VMAT2 gene been studied specifically to measure spiritual/religious inclinations? | YES

[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2262126/ ] “Experimenting with Spirituality: Analyzing The God Gene in a Nonmajors Laboratory Course” (2008)

“In his book, Hamer contends that one’s predisposition toward spirituality is influenced by genetic factors. More controversially, he proposes that the VMAT2 gene is one of many potential genes that impinge on spirituality.

VMAT2 encodes a transporter protein that imports several monoamine neurotransmitters into vesicles in the brain (reviewed in Zheng et al., 2006 blue right-pointing triangle). Thus, an alteration in the transporter could potentially affect the levels of multiple types of neurotransmitters, resulting in altered brain function. Changes in this monoamine transporter’s sequence or expression have been associated with substance abuse and Parkinson’s disease.

[ https://symbiosisonlinepublishing.com/genetic-science/genetic-science12.php ] “VMAT2 Gene Molecular study of 2,000 peoples in the Religious Behavior and Belief in God of the citizens of the city of Tabriz in IRAN” (2016)

“VMAT2 codes for a vesicular monoamine transporter that plays a key role in regulating the levels of the brain chemicals serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine. These monoamine transmitters are in turn postulated to play an important role in regulating the brain activities associated with mystic beliefs.”

Is the VMAT2 gene being used/studied in CRISPR technology? | YES
[ https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.10.459766v1 ] “Combining CRISPR/Cas9 and brain imaging: from genes to proteins to networks” (2021)

“Here, we combine CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing with in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the direct link between genes, proteins, and the brain connectome. The extensive knowledge of the Slc18a2 gene encoding the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2), involved in the storage and release of dopamine, makes it an excellent basis for studying the gene networks relationships.

[ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/apha.13725 ] “Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (SLC18A2) regulates monoamine turnover and brain development in zebrafish” (2021)

A zebrafish strain lacking functional Vmat2 was generated with the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Amine synthesising and degrading enzymes, and genes essential for brain development, were analysed with quantitative PCR, in situ hybridisation and immunocytochemistry.

VMAT2 blockers reserpine and tetrabenazine induce depressive symptoms in both humans and animals, and altered pharmacodynamics of VMAT2 binding in platelets of children with depression have been reported.

CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been recently applied to modify the vmat2 gene in zebrafish. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become a popular model organism in neuroscience because it shares genetic homology with humans and possesses the main neurotransmitters present in humans.

Is the VMAT2 gene being used/studied and used for the development of vaccines/drugs? | YES

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17985233/ ] “Inhibition of vesicular monoamine transporter-2 activity in alpha-synuclein stably transfected SH-SY5Y cells” (2008)

“alpha-Synuclein plays a key role in the pathological neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease.

“These data suggest that Up-regulated alpha-synuclein expression inhibits the activity of vesicular monoamine transporter-2, thereby interrupting dopamine homeostasis and resulting in dopaminergic neuron injury in Parkinson’s disease.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23390095/ ] “Parkinson’s disease and alpha synuclein: is Parkinson’s disease a prion-like disorder?” (2013)

“Importantly, duplication/triplication of the wild type α-synuclein gene also cause a form of PD, indicating that increased levels of the normal α-synuclein protein is sufficient to cause the disease.

Recent evidence now suggests the possibility that α-synuclein is a prion-like protein and that PD is a prion-like disease.

– these findings support the hypothesis that α-synuclein is a prion-like protein that can adopt a self-propagating conformation that causes neurodegeneration.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23771222/ ] “α-Synuclein vaccination prevents the accumulation of parkinson disease-like pathologic inclusions in striatum in association with regulatory T cell recruitment in a rat model” (2013)

– brains of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and the presence in serum of α-synuclein (α-syn)-specific antibodies suggest that the peripheral immune system may have an active role in the progression of PD. We designed a vaccination strategy to attempt to control these processes and mediate protection against disease progression – “

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25220836/ ] “VMAT2 and Parkinson’s disease: harnessing the dopamine vesicle” (2014)

Human studies demonstrate that the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2; SLC18A2) is dysfunctional in PD brain.

Therapeutic manipulation of VMAT2 level or function has the potential to improve efficacy of dopamine derived from administered levodopa, increase dopamine neurotransmission from remaining midbrain dopamine neurons and protect against neurotoxic insults. Thus, the development of drugs to enhance the storage of release of dopamine may be a fruitful avenue of research for PD.”

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29669468/ ] “Inducible Alpha-Synuclein Expression Affects Human Neural Stem Cells’ Behavior” (2018)

“In this study, we present a novel human Tet-on human neural stem cell (hNSC) line, in which aSyn timing and level of expression can be tightly experimentally tuned.”

[ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990466/ ] “Treating Parkinson’s Disease with Antibodies: Previous Studies and Future Directions” (2021)

“aSyn was also found to modulate dopamine homeostasis through the inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression, interaction with the dopamine transporter (DAT), and vesicular transporter VMAT2 which stores dopamine in synaptic vesicles.”

“In clinical trials, the company Affiris is assessing the efficacy of two next generation AFFITOPE® vaccines (PD01A and PD03A) which are peptides that mimic the C-terminus of aSyn.”

Just as a reminder to everyone, what is the leading adverse event that is being reported due to the “COVID vaccine“?

Aside from “general disorders and administration site conditions”:

“nervous system disorders” is the leading side effect of all 4 (Pfizer/Comirnaty, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca) COVID vaccines with a combined total of ~443,000 incidences as of September 11, 2021. And that’s just the number of people who have reported, with an estimated 1-10% (generous estimate) of cases being reported; many cases go un-reported.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive disorder, which targets the nervous system that is responsible for body movement in the brain. This disorder causes many symptoms such as slowness, tremors, balance problems, as well as body stiffness. All of that happens because of the death of dopamine-producing neurons.” – How Does Parkinson Affect The Nervous System?

All of these correlations seems to suggest that the “COVID vaccine” may be nothing more than a giant experiment on the human race in order to manipulate our immune system, moods and behavior, and our spirituality and will to live.

And with companies like AC Immune, who are and have been working on vaccines to treat Parkinson’s, one has to wonder if they are a part of this whole big pharma conglomerate as well; just waiting in the wings to present their miracle cure (at the right cost, of course – which may also keep people numbed down and apathetic, depending on the severity of their vaccines’ effects) while the rest of us succumb to the harmful effects of the “COVID vaccines” and/or viral shedding of the spike proteins and toxins in our water, air, foods, etc. – which are damaging us not only physically, but emotionally and spiritually as well.

“FunVax a hoax?”

No. This is exactly what they were aiming for all these years. And with the the advent of CRISPR and a worldwide goal to vaccinate the whole population, they now know exactly what to target.

FunVax scientist: “On the left over here, we have individuals who are religious fundamentalists, religious fanatics. And this is the expression of rt-pcr, real-time pcr expression of the VMAT2 gene.

Over here we have individuals, so – so let me complete –  so over here we have individuals who are not particularly fundamentalists, not particularly religious, and you can see there’s a much reduced expression of this particular gene – that the VMAT2 gene.

Another evidence that, that supports our hypothesis for the development of this approach. -“

Audience attendee: “What you’re suggesting here is by, by spreading this virus we’re going to eliminate individuals from donning on a bomb vest and going into a market, blowing up the market.”

FunVax scientist: “So our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have over expression of the VMAT2 gene and that by vaccinating them against this, will eliminate this behavior.

So we have some, some very, very remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have two brain scans, these are fMRIs – these are two different individuals with different levels of expression of the VMAT2.

On top is an individual who’s a religious fanatic, and individual, and we’ve repeated this numerous times that, that has high levels of VMAT2. Now, um, this individual down here who had low levels of the VMAT2 gene, this individual would self-describe as, as not particularly religious. In each case, these individuals were read a religious text – this individual light – lit up the right middle frontal gyrus, shown here, and that’s a part of the brain that’s associated with theory of mind. It’s a part of the brain that has to do with intense and in beliefs and desires.

In contrast, in mark contrast, here’s an individual who would not particularly self-describe as, as religious, and when they’re read a religious text, what you see is that this part of the brain called the anterior insula lights up. This is a part of the brain that’s associated with disgust or displeasure on hearing something.”

Audience attendee: “Do you suggesting, like, take a CT scan with me when I’m evaluating people to determine whether I put a bullet in their head?”

FunVax scientist: “So, so um the data that I’m presenting here, uh, supports the concept that we’re proposing, uh, and I think that we would not propose to do CT scans or fMRIs on individuals out in the hinterlands of Afghanistan.

The virus would immunize against this VMAT2 gene and that would have the effect that you see here which is, it’s essentially to turn a fanatic into a, a normal person. And we think that will have major effects in the Middle East.”

Audience attendee: “How would you suggest that this is going to be dispersed? Aerosol? Or…?”

FunVax scientist: “Well, so, so the present plan, and the test that we’ve done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu, or rhinoviruses, and we believe that that’s a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses and we’re, we’re quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”

Audience attendee: “This is fascinating. What’s the name of this proposal?”

FunVax scientiest: “Yes, so, so the name of this project is FunVax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Audience attendee: “And you have a proposal already?”

FunVax Scientist: “The proposal has just been submitted and I think that the data that I have shown you today would, would support the, the development of this project and we think it has great promise.”

From the FUNVAX Documentary footage:

Narrator @ 03:57: “So let’s get back to reality for a minute. Is a vaccine against religious fundamentalism even possible?”

Same FunVax scientist from leaked 2005 footage: “So somebody asked me to design a vaccine for religious fundamentalism or fanaticism, uh, basically what I would do is to try to better understand why people are fanatical. Why do they have extreme behavior? Uh, it’s pretty clear these days that, that all behavior results from, uh, activity of our own brains. And so there must be pathways that are important in generating this kind of behavior.”

Dean Hamer (worked as director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit and as an independent research at the NIH): “So if indeed spirituality is this series of chemical reactions in the brain, and if it can be enhanced by certain types of drug, then, naturally it follows that it can be inhibited as well. ‘Cause for every activator there must be an inhibitor. And so I can easily imagine under the right circumstances, the right stimuli, or the right drugs, and the right inhibitors, might have some effect on a person’s spirituality.

At least in the short run. Whether or not that would have a long term effect, or people would undergo homeostasis and alter, uh, is an open question. We really don’t know the answer to that.”

FunVax scientist: “It would be quite useful to eliminate some of the fanatical, um… religious nuts in the world. And I think that, that, um, maybe a vaccine would be the way to do that. It’s difficult to know how successful it would be, but it’s certainly an interesting idea. From the point of view of a, uh, medical professional, um, the question of spreading a virus that is – has not been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, is a major issue.

One last mention, if one is to look at the top left side of the leaked Pentagon footage, we can see the following identifier: “DOD ID 149AZ2

Does that sound familiar? It should. It’s the same project ID that is listed on the Quarterly FunVax Review documents from above.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by lisichik from Pixabay