Dr. Ariyana Discusses Nano-Biosensors/Nanorazors and Dr. Noack’s Death After He Located Graphene Hydroxide in the COVID Vaccine

Why is graphene oxide/hydroxide and rectangular objects found in the COVID vaccines?

Dr. Andreas Noack, the German doctor who was purported to have exposed graphene hydroxide in the vaccines, based on charts of the chemical composition of it (labeling his findings as “nano-razor blades”), has allegedly passed away very soon after the release of his bombshell video.

You can watch his presentation describing the graphene hydroxide here.

While the circumstances about his death is surrounded with suspicion and controversy, Dr. Ariyana Love claims to have been given proof of his death, with a personal invite to his funeral.

While it is hard to say what the truth is surrounding this matter, the dangers of the “vaccine” is irrefutable; causing untold amount of damage that has been seen both instantaneously, as well as a few days/weeks/months after its injection. Not to mention what may arise in the near to not-so-distant future.

It also brings up the question that if the vaccines contain all of these harmful substances, why are they in there? For what purpose? Many doctors and scientists are finding out that it has nothing to do with “COVID”. And while the conclusion may be something they have a difficult time coming to terms with, the evidence has to be looked at with a purely unbiased and thoroughly researched point of view. What are the facts? Who is initiating it? What are their agendas?

Dr. Ariyana Love delves a little bit more into these questions with her interview with Stew Peters.

The full transcript is available below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Stew Peters: “Well the magical new Omicron variant of coronavirus has, like clockwork, restarted this frenzy for lockdowns and restrictions all around the world.

The U.K. has vaccine passports now. In Austria, they’re seriously considering booting down doors, forcefully making entry into people’s dwellings and force jabbing them. Germany of course is locking down all unvaccinated people. In New York City, they’re requiring all children, ages 5 and up to get the jab if they want to go to restaurants or just about anywhere else.

Folks, remember, this is for a disease that children face statistically zero danger from. And which they’re largely incapable of even spreading.

But that’s the pattern that we’re in now. The left can’t come clean on the bioweapon, so they’re tripling down. They’re becoming more obsessed than ever with more shots in more arms. And you better believe, if the third dose doesn’t cut it, whatever their objective is, they’ll start mandating four and five, and more.

They’ll vaccinate newborns! They’ll vaccinate their pets, their dogs, their cats, they’ll water their house plants with these shots.

And that means, of course, that they’ll be more frenzied than ever about silencing anyone that shares dissenting viewpoints on these shots.

Dr. Ariyana Love of Finland has been one of our leading guests on the question of whether graphene oxide is in these vaccines. She’s recently shared some upsetting news with us. Dr. Andreas Noack, the German doctor who claims to have found microscopic nanorazors within a vaccine sample, has died. Just days after his most recent findings. What could the implications of his  sudden demise be.

Dr. Ariyana Love joins us now. Dr. Love, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “God bless you, Stew.”

Stew Peters: “So, when we speculated or you had mentioned that Dr. Noack had died, we heard, “No, that’s fake news. He’s still very much alive.” You’re now insisting, you can confirm that he’s dead? Just days after sharing/going public with the fact that he found these razorblades inside of these so-called safe and effective vaccines?

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Right. I received the personal invitation to his funeral. It had, you know, personal names, phone numbers, emails, personal contact information, and the location of his funeral. It’s real, he is deceased. Of course that’s not for public viewing, but I sent it over to your, to your staff.

Then a source on the ground in Austria called the hospital which con- who – that hospital confirmed that he is deceased. And he died there in the hospital. So, Dr. Noack is, is dead. There was an electrical outage that night, and the night that he blew the whistle, and this is poten- this is evidence of potentially directed energy weapons being used. So I wanted to just mention that.

And then on December 3rd, there was a video released anonymously of darkfield microscopy, showing the graphene hydroxide razor – nanorazor blades. And they were zoomed in all the way onto the individual razorblades; they look exactly like razorblades. It was dubbed in German, so it very well could be related to his work. Um, that’s ground-breaking. And of course the mainstream media is going to be silent.”

Video in question can be found at Dr. Ariyana Love’s website: LEAKED FOOTAGE: GRAPHENE HYDROXIDE NANO-RAZORBLADES – DARK FIELD MICROSCOPY

Translation of the German subtitles to English is offered below:

Anonymous source/Stew Peters Show

Spektakulare Aufnahmen aus dem Dunkelfeld

Spectacular Images from the Dark field

untersuchter impfstoff: BioNTech Pfizer

vaccine studied: BioNTech Pfizer

Die folgenden Aufnahmen entstanden unter einem Dunkelfeld Mikroskop…

the following images were taken under a dark field microscope…

Substanz: BioNTech Pfizer
Methode: Vorgeschriebene Aktivierung mit NaCL

Substance: BioNTech Pfizer
method: prescribed activation with NaCL

Kugelformige Blase
Viele davon in der Substanz sichtbar…

spherical bubble
many of them visible in the substance…

Mit einem handelsublichen Magneten sollte gepruft werden, ob sich magnetische Bestandteile in der Probe befinden…

with a commercial magnet it should be checked whether there are magnetic components in the sample…

Mit dem, was dann folgte, hat niemand gerechnet…

nobody expected what followed…

Achtung, jetzt kommt der Magnet an die Probe

attention, now the magnet comes to the sample

Hier noch mal…. …langsam…

here again…. …slow…

Nach diesem Ereignis flimmerte und schillerte es uberall.

After this event, it flickered and shimmered everywhere.

Aber dabei blieb es nicht…

But it didn’t stop there…

Die Blase hatte sich verandert… eine Art Schlauch hat sich gebildet

The bubble had changed… a kind of hose has formed

und etwas scheint heraus zu flieben

and something seems to fly out

Diese Bewegungen fanden ohne aubere Einwirkung statt

These movements took place without any external influence.

Zugabe von UV licht

Addition of UV light

Substanz: BioNTech Pfizer
Methode: Purer Impfstoff

Substance: BioNTech Pfizer
Method: Pure vaccine

Das Flimmern unter UV Licht

Flickering under UV light

Anomalien. Herkunft unbekannt…

Anomalies. Origin unknown…

Die Blasen hier sahen etwas anders aus

The bubbles here looked a little different

Das Flimmern in 1.250-facher Vergroberung

Flickering in 1,250-fold fermentation

Uberall sind rechteckige Objekte zu sehen

Rectangular objects can be seen everywhere

Was ist das?

What is that?

Wissen die Arzte, was sie den Menschen verabreichen?

Do doctors know what they are giving people?

Wissen die Menschen, was sie da bekommen?

Do people know what they are getting?

Jeder Mensch ist frei.

In Gedenken an alle, die dafur kampfen.

Everyone is free.

In memory of all those who fight for it.

Dr. Ariyana Love (cont. with Stew Peters): “All right. Then I’m going to share some things from the patents. This is Dr. Zandra Botha; remember she found those disc like nanostructures? [Stew Peters: “Yes, of course.”] Well those, in the patents, they’re – in the Pfizer patent it’s called “microbeads”. And in the Moderna, it was “microbubbles” and “microspheres”. They’re the same thing.

Image credited to Dr. Zandra Botha / Stew Peters Show

Dr. Ariyana Love (cont.): “Then Dr. Pablo Campra mentioned nano-biosensors. These are in the DARPA patent that names T shaped micro-fluidic biochips. So they are biochips.

Now I wanted to talk also about the quantum dots. Because this is very important. Moderna and Pfizer patents are using, they mention the quantum dots. These are made from graphene oxide as well. This is more proof that graphene oxide is in the shots.

So quantum dot is used for, get this, DNA barcoding, and ownership of humans. It’s branding using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The quantum dot patent application was granted on June 8th, 2021. Very recently. So they’ve been trying to hide this. They didn’t want it public.

All right. It’s a marker gene for bio-imaging and bio-tracking of humans. The quantum dots are color based markers. They’re tiny artificial atoms that are created chemically in a lab.”

Stew Peters: “Who’s behind this patent, by the way?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Well, I’m going to get into that in just a second.” [Stew Peters: “All right.”]

They’re fusing two atoms together. Get this, this is mind blowing, it’s like total sci-fi. They’re fusing two atoms together to create an artificial molecule. Um, so they have take – they have created a new programmable matter, that can be reprogrammed anytime, and controlled externally from A.I.

Now they are – so this is like playing gods, and altering God’s creation, and creating a whole new reality.

Now these quantum dots, they are – they have luciferase, which is insect DNA, jellyfish DNA, glowworm DNA, those are all being transfected into human cells for tracing and barcoding. This is cross-species genomics. They’re creating a new species from humans.

This technology was developed at the University of – sorry, at the Hebrew University in occupied Jerusalem. This technology is patented and owned by Yissum, a technology transfer company of the Hebrew University, and owned by Nanosys, which is headquartered in Silicon Valley, California. These two companies are sublicing [sic] the technology worldwide. So there’s sixty additional quantum dot patents that don’t expire until 2030.

Yissum business partners include Boston Scientific, Google, ICL, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Microsoft, Novartis, and many more. Samsung has also partnered with Nanosys.

Moderna’s patents are owned by Israel. Pfizer’s patents are owned by Israel. Their CEOs are both Israeli. So who’s your daddy? Right? These are – these are the patent holders. They have the vested interest in barcoding and enslaving humanity, and branding humans like cattle.

So, based on the patents, we know that they’re going to – what they’re going to use this technology for, and why they need it in you. And either by injection, masks, nasal swabs, hand sanitizer, or aerial spraying.

Now Klaus Schwab said that the hydrogels would be in everything by the end of the year. That’s now. The hydrogels are made from graphene oxide. They contain the entire weapons system. The mRNA cloning technology.

Fauci and the NIH funded the hydrogels, which are skin-penetrating, and can be disseminated by aerial spraying; Infowars covered this. They are literally saturating human beings with the hydrogels for – to genetically modify them for patent ability.

This is the Israeli state, CCP, Chinese Communist Party, the “elites”, and the “elites” and many more. You know, they want to monitor our biometric data in order to know who is they’re eligible property. And who isn’t yet. And they want everyone barcoded.

Stew Peters: “So um, there’s no escaping this, is what you’re saying? In other words, if I choose not to go and get this shot, which I absolutely am choosing not to do, they’re going to have to kill me. They’re not going to give me the shot. Same goes for my kids. But I’m not going to escape it because it’s in the air? It’s – it’s sprayable? And it’s, it’s in everything else that penetrates my skin? So no matter what, I’m going to get this computing system? This, this barcode? I’m going to be trackable and traceable?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Yeah, that’s what it appears to be. But there’s hope. I mean, there is – there are, there is a supplement that can repair and restore damaged DNA. It can turn genes back on; to what extent I don’t know. But it’s reversing the coagulation cascade within minutes.

 

There is hope for people, there’s hope for people who are vaxxed. We have to continue to detoxify and stay on a protocol that works with our body to give us the defense we need. So there are substances that exist and I’m helping people with that.”

Stew Peters: “All right. Do you want to give any information as to where people can find any of this stuff?”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Yeah, my email is metanutrients@mailfence.com. That’s meta – metanutrients. And I can give that email to you. You can put it in the show notes.”

Stew Peters: “Yeah, uh, I – you know, listen, I don’t like blackpilling, I don’t like saying that things are hopeless, but you’re saying that they’re not hopeless. Right? That people – “

Dr. Ariyana Love: “They’re not hopeless. We’ve got microscop- I’m working with doctors worldwide. Okay? These are frontline doctors, these are people at the top of their career- their field. And we are getting results. Some doctors are getting results when they use the natural protocols. Um, and so I’m guiding people to those, and I’m still researching all the time. We’ve got microscopy- “

Stew Peters: “Yeah, because we’re not gonna give up. We’re on team God, we’re on team Jesus, we win. We know that. The good book says that. We know how the book ends. We’re on the right team. So we’re not going to give up. We’re gonna fight this thing like hell, until the absolute very end. And in Jesus’ name, we are going to win this.

I mean, this is, this is not going to happen. Our kids are not going to be ownable property by any government anywhere. Um, our kids are children of God. That’s who they belong to.

Dr. Ariyana Love, thank you so much for coming today. We appreciate it.”

Dr. Ariyana Love: “Thank you, God bless you Stew.”

Stew Peters: “God bless you.”

With Dr. Ariyana’s research and conclusion pointing to a technological conversion of humankind with artificial intelligence and a new created species, I have to bring up once again Craig Venter’s work in this field.

Craig Venter is one of the most leading scientists/researchers of the Human Genome Project, and who, along with his team, was among the first to transfect a cell with a synthetic chromosome.

He also has collaborations/affiliations with Francis Collins of the NIH, and Eric Landers of the Human Genome Project (and who is also currently the President’s Science Advisor and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy).

A key quote from Craig Venter that pertains very well to the subject at hand:

“It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.”

Craig Venter (2010)

I wish these were all just sci-fi and conspiracy theories. But these individuals/organizations have something far more nefarious planned than “saving lives” and simply “helping us” track our medical/health records. We just need to realize it, and then make the right choice for ourselves and our family.

Stay strong, and God bless you all.

Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

Israel News: “The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people” due to “immuno-erosion”

Compilation of Israel news clips shows they are questioning the “vaccine” efficacy.

Because it’s important to also get outside perspective when dealing with a situation of this magnitude, and because we cannot rely on American news sources to accurately portray the events around us, I wanted to highlight the following compilation that was created using Israeli news clips and whom someone has graciously translated and subtitled with English captions.

And although many of us already know about the ineffectiveness of the so-called “vaccines” and may have already heard about the news coming from Israel about the vaccines waning over time, the following clips gives us a bird’s eye view of how their news media is handling the information.

Due to the many different clips and my unfamiliarity with following Israel’s news and the Hebrew language, I cannot determine the dates (if they were from days/weeks/months ago) or the legitimacy of what has been translated. I have read comments confirming that the subtitles are correct, and I have also read comments stating “If Israel says anything, it is a lie.” I am also unfamiliar if the Israeli news stations has similar motives as the United States mainstream media – in which, as research has indicated, is to promote certain narratives/propaganda and to cause division and chaos.

So please take everything into account and do not just believe everything you read, see and hear.

There is also the confusing nature of ongoing booster shots apparently scheduled for the people in Israel, and one has to question the decision-making in these matters seeing as how if the vaccines didn’t work the first time, or second time, or third time around… – what makes anyone believe that continuous ineffective “booster” shots will be any better? For all of what? 2-3 months of maybe mediocre “protection” until another booster is needed? It would seem the best way forward would be to denounce these dangerous “gene-therapy” tools, and seek alternative/repairing medicines instead and build up on natural immunity which many studies have proven to be far more effective than any vaccine. (But I digress…)

Lastly, I do want to send a huge thank you to hasifot@telegram for compiling the clips and whomever translated/subtitled them to English in case it was a different person/group. With anything of this type of endeavor, it takes a lot of time and effort to create, and I appreciate the work that has gone into it. Many, many thanks.

1st Clip: “In this wave we’re seeing infection and illness in vaccinated individuals. We’re seeing vaccinated individuals that are… sick… and arrive at the hospitals in serious condition… And we’re seeing deaths as well!

The increase in the number of seriously ill, who have been vaccinated, is an increase that we have seen over the past few days very significantly.”

@00:25: 2nd Clip:The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people, that seemingly have gone through… “immuno-erosion”… 83 dead just in the past month.”

@00:35: 3rd Clip: “At the same time, in addition to this number that we see on the screen, there are also 15 sick that are in serious condition.”

@00:42: 4th Clip: “Let’s admit the truth. At the moment we don’t really know. Because, as Bennett himself said in his opening statement, “We don’t have anyone to learn from, we’re the only country that is vaccinated to such an extent. In the entire world this is a completely novel challenge. And therefore we must gather just a bit more data, and then decide.” 

@00:57: 5th Clip: “I today don’t see a difference. Really, I don’t see a difference. Between if I, as someone that has been vaccinated with two doses, got sick so, so badly. So what does it matter if you take the vaccines or not?”

@01:08: 6th Clip: “Certainly it is starting to bother us.”

@01:11: 7th Clip – Speaker 1: “Meanwhile we are becoming aware of the fact that the Director General of the Sheba Hospital, Professor Yitzhak Kreiss, he was, if you recall, the third person to get vaccinated (in Israel), after the Prime Minister and Minister of Health. He also has become sick with COVID despite being vaccinated.

Do you have a clear position, Professor, regarding what they call the “boost”? That is, an additional dose, which we must say, is still not to be found in Pfizer’s protocols.”

Speaker 2: We must say, decisively, even, that there isn’t any medical basis, as of today, for massive and bulk vaccination of the population with a third vaccine, with a booster. We really are not at the point in time that we need to vaccinate the bulk of the population with a third dose.”

@01:56: 8th Clip – Speaker 1: “Yesterday, around eight in the evening, the Health Ministry published data seemingly about a decline in the efficacy of the vaccine. And that’s, at the very least, a bit strange…”

Speaker 2: “Yes, it’s a bit strange. In general the Health Ministry isn’t exceptional in sharing information, isn’t exceptional in sharing data with the public. And that’s a matter that… – “

Speaker 3: “By the way, what about the transparency of the “Corona Cabinet”? All of the Ministers of the Cabinet promised us, they fought for it during the previous administration.”

[undetermined who is speaking at this time but it appears as if it is Speaker 2]: “Yes, “we’ll publish the protocols”, okay, so, on with it!

30 years (of confidentiality), what’s the big deal? So where do we see it happening? We’re in favor of the protocols being published, and we’re especially in favor of much more data from the Health Ministry.”

Off-camera speaker: “But they came out against this secrecy, now they (the new government) are there and they’re continuing with the secrecy!”

Speaker 3: “No, now there’s really state secrets. We have to make sure that the virus doesn’t find out! (jokingly) If the coronavirus finds out what we’re going to do, it will… you know…”

Speaker 2:There is very problematic conduct in the data of the Health Ministry.

This week, in response to our request, they gave us the breakdown of the seriously ill into vaccinated and non-vaccinated. They’ve promised us that starting next week it will be published on a regular basis.

I’m waiting to see. Yes, there is a very significant discrepancy between the data of the studies done in Israel on the efficacy of the vaccine versus those published in Britain and in the United States. Especially pertaining to infection. Because according to the study that was conducted here in Israel, the efficacy against infection fell to 40%, the efficacy of the vaccine. And really, many questions arise how we’ve arrived at such a low number. Even though, like Arad said…”

@03:09: 9th Clip: “Most of the patients right now, are vaccinated, obviously.”

@03:13: 10th Clip: “And the funniest thing is that we ask them. “Okay, I got infected. But before she did the test, I got infected, you informed me that I’m sick with COVID. What happens with her?”

So, they ask me on the phone: “Did she get vaccinated?”

I told her, “Yes, we both got vaccinated.”

“No problem, she doesn’t need to quarantine, she can travel freely.”

Okay, so she was going around freely. And now a few days later we did a test again and she’s positive. What happened during that time that she was going around outside?”

We have to realize, no matter what race we are, no matter what nationality we are, we are all human beings that deserve the truth and the morality of being treated with dignity and respect. As it is, it seems that ALL OF US, across ALL countries, have been lied to, save for the corrupt individuals/institutions that are running this program. There is no doubt that a criminal conspiracy is in the works, and it all points to a “one world government” / “great reset” agenda.

Why the huge demand to get “EVERYONE” vaccinated? The full scope and true motives are still unclear, but one thing is certain: it is not for everyone’s “health and safety”. But perhaps it is for “their” safety. Those that are familiar with the organizations involved, may know/speculate of who “they” are; often referred to as the “elite”, “deep state”, freemasons, “global leaders”, etc.

Now the question is, will we allow their stranglehold on our freedoms and rights to continue? Or will we finally stand up and say, “I do not comply.”?

I, for one, and I’m sure in the sea of many, WILL NOT COMPLY.

Many blessings to all, and once again, many thanks to those involved in the creation of this compilation.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Alexandra_Koch from Pixabay