The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability”

“The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection.”

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Alix Mayer
on Mercola 9 January 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule.

Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

    1. There must be an emergency;
    2. a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
    3. the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
    4. and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

*


In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Notes

1 Reuters October 19, 2021

2 Biotech Law December 22, 2003

3 Maryannedemasi.com November 11, 2021

4 The BMJ Opinion

5 FDA BioNTech BLA Approval

6 USA Today December 22, 2021

NOTE FROM EXPANDING AWARENESS RELATIONS:

How egregious that the big pharmaceutical companies are trying to use children as a liability shield to protect their criminal organization. Even worse, however, are the governments/politicians and health officials/institutions that are letting them. No amount of “contracts” should ever protect criminal activity, which is what we’re seeing right now in what is quite possibly the largest racketeering scandal in the history of humankind.

(And in my opinion, this isn’t even covering the ACTUAL REAL reason that they want to vaccinate children so much. This is only the watered-down, “scientific”, realistic version…)

Any documents/legal dealings (keyword here: LEGAL – although, what does that matter when corrupt enterprises are able to re-define terms according to their purpose?) and NDA’s should automatically become null and void if there is fraudulent activity happening.

However, when those “in charge” are allowed to investigate themselves, they, of course, end up finding no wrong-doing. And when there are multiple conflicts of interest, all for the purpose of financial bribery and protecting each other, there needs to be effective systems in place to address this obvious malfeasance.

It would seem, the “law” (and even us, everyday/ordinary people) literally needs to take matters into its own hands, and stop catering to enforcing illegal mandates and nonsensical “policies”. When will they go after the REAL criminals, instead of innocent civilians who are simply trying to defend not only their rights and freedoms, but everyone else’s as well? Including law enforcement?

We all need to pick our side in history. Let’s hope we’re picking the right one.

Down the Rabbit Hole: “Conspiracy Theories” Playing Out in Real Time

Scandalous plots? Yes. They have been planned for a long time…

It amazes me, that even with all the resources we have today, and all of the brave people coming forward or even offering information anonymously in order to expose dark corruptions going on in our world, some people will still not realize this and instead refuse to believe any such conspiracy could be possible. There are even doctors and scientists that state, point blank, what they are aiming for. And people will STILL NOT BELIEVE that it is happening.

Their arguments usually contain some form of the following, if not all of them:

“But why would they do this? It doesn’t make sense.”

“I find it hard to believe that a world-wide conspiracy for a “new world order” is possible. Too many people would have to be involved. Somebody would say something.” (That’s exactly what some people are doing, but people are still not believing them…)

“That’s just a crazy conspiracy theory. You crazy conspiracy theorist.”

“Bill Gates is wonderful. He’s spending billions of dollars to help us. I can’t believe you think he’s some evil villain.” (Not to say that I think he’s an evil villain… *cough*)

“There’s no way they have a diabolical plan to inject people with harmful substances. You watch too much tv.”

I’m sure you get the gist of it.

Yes, trying to wake people up is a difficult endeavor. Us critical thinkers can point out the obvious, but it’s up to them to actually LOOK at what is presented, and come to an epiphany that, “Wow, they may be right after all.” Instead of plugging their ears and closing their eyes, saying, “La la la! I can’t hear you!”

Therefore, I am going to present some actual footage and forms that show that what is going on around us RIGHT NOW has been already planned by immoral agencies for decades/centuries/millenia.

Keep in mind, this is just a small sample out of all of the testimonies and admissions that have been exposed. While some may be anecdotal in nature, it cannot be lost on us that some of these testimonies and reveals were made many years ago, and as we can see in our current timeline, these agendas are being played out as stated.

(Also be aware, due to the nature of our reality, some of these propositions may be somewhat unorthodox depending on one’s belief structure… which is another topic that needs to be seriously looked into without automatically caving into a dismissive attitude. While it may be hard to believe, especially for those who are more inclined to believing only in a physical/materialistic world, the implications that this physical construct is most certainly not our true being is the core of the struggles we’re enduring today.)

This post contains disturbing material.

Jump to:

1. Rudolf Steiner predicted (in 1917) worldwide vaccines to damage/alter our personality/spirituality

1917

(All quotes by Rudolf Steiner. Some embellishment added for emphasis)

“The time will come — and it may not be far off — when quite different tendencies will come up at a congress like the one held in 1912 and people will say: It is pathological for people to even think in terms of spirit and soul. ‘Sound’ people will speak of nothing but the body. It will be considered a sign of illness for anyone to arrive at the idea of any such thing as a spirit or a soul. People who think like that will be considered to be sick and — you can be quite sure of it — a medicine will be found for this. At Constantinople the spirit was made non-existent. The soul will be made non-existent with the aid of a drug. Taking a ‘sound point of view’, people will invent a vaccine to influence the organism as early as possible, preferably as soon as it is born, so that this human body never even gets the idea that there is a soul and a spirit.”

“…the heirs of modern materialism, will look for the vaccine to make the body ‘healthy’, that is, makes its constitution such that this body no longer talks of such rubbish as soul and spirit…”

“Materialistic physicians will be asked to drive the souls out of humanity.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 5: Changes in Humanity’s Spiritual Make-up

1917

Rudolf Steiner: “I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts, in whom they will be dwelling, to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. Today, bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune, so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life — ‘foolish’ here, of course, in the eyes of materialists.”

Source: Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 13: The Fallen Spirits’ Influence in the World

You can read the entire lecture, which delves in deeper into the subject of spirituality, human evolution and our morality, and even the hidden influences that coerce us into specific decision making, here.

The above quotes mention specifically the advent of a vaccine to drive out any inclinations of spirituality and souls from human beings. Very strange that a materialistic physician would even entertain the idea if they did not believe in this aspect to begin with. Of course, if they believe that it is only a false belief and not a real essence, then I’m sure scientists really could attempt to address this “problem” by attacking the brain, perhaps, maybe even by genetically modifying our dna, let’s say, and/or performing surgery on the “disillusioned believer”.

How could they do this? Maybe through a worldwide effort to inject everyone with a vaccine that targets this phenomena – just as a far out theory? (I mean, it’s not like there’s an agenda to vaccinate the whole world in today’s time, right?)

Which brings me to the released footage from 2005, allegedly from the Pentagon describing this very process.

2. Meeting (from 2005) announcing vaccine/respiratory illness to suppress spirituality/religious inclinations (FunVax / VMAT2 / God gene)

Transcript from the above video (again, embellishment added for emphasis):

2005

FunVax scientist: “On the left over here, we have individuals who are religious fundamentalists, religious fanatics. And this is the expression of rt-pcr, real-time pcr expression of the VMAT2 gene.

Over here we have individuals, so – so let me complete –  so over here we have individuals who are not particularly fundamentalists, not particularly religious, and you can see there’s a much reduced expression of this particular gene – that the VMAT2 gene.

Another evidence that, that supports our hypothesis for the development of this approach. -“

Audience attendee: “What you’re suggesting here is by, by spreading this virus we’re going to eliminate individuals from donning on a bomb vest and going into a market, blowing up the market.”

FunVax scientist: “So our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have over expression of the VMAT2 gene and that by vaccinating them against this, will eliminate this behavior.

So we have some, some very, very remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have two brain scans, these are fMRIs – these are two different individuals with different levels of expression of the VMAT2.

On top is an individual who’s a religious fanatic, and individual, and we’ve repeated this numerous times that, that has high levels of VMAT2. Now, um, this individual down here who had low levels of the VMAT2 gene, this individual would self-describe as, as not particularly religious. In each case, these individuals were read a religious text – this individual light – lit up the right middle frontal gyrus, shown here, and that’s a part of the brain that’s associated with theory of mind. It’s a part of the brain that has to do with intense and in beliefs and desires.

In contrast, in mark contrast, here’s an individual who would not particularly self-describe as, as religious, and when they’re read a religious text, what you see is that this part of the brain called the anterior insula lights up. This is a part of the brain that’s associated with disgust or displeasure on hearing something.”

Audience attendee: “Do you suggesting, like, take a CT scan with me when I’m evaluating people to determine whether I put a bullet in their head?”

FunVax scientist: “So, so um the data that I’m presenting here, uh, supports the concept that we’re proposing, uh, and I think that we would not propose to do CT scans or fMRIs on individuals out in the hinterlands of Afghanistan.

The virus would immunize against this VMAT2 gene and that would have the effect that you see here which is, it’s essentially to turn a fanatic into a, a normal person. And we think that will have major effects in the Middle East.”

Audience attendee: “How would you suggest that this is going to be dispersed? Aerosol? Or…?”

FunVax scientist: “Well, so, so the present plan, and the test that we’ve done so far have used respiratory viruses such as flu, or rhinoviruses, and we believe that that’s a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest part of the population. Most of us, of course, have been exposed to both of those viruses and we’re, we’re quite confident that this will be a very successful approach.”

Audience attendee: “This is fascinating. What’s the name of this proposal?”

FunVax scientiest: “Yes, so, so the name of this project is FunVax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Audience attendee: “And you have a proposal already?”

FunVax Scientist: “The proposal has just been submitted and I think that the data that I have shown you today would, would support the, the development of this project and we think it has great promise.”

Footage from a proposed FunVax Documentary initiated by Ryan Harper that I don’t believe has been fully created yet… for one reason or another:

Source: youtube | FunVaxDoc | Is FunVax Possible? Dean Hamer and FunVax Scientist Discuss

(If any of the links on this site no longer work or exist, please let me know. Citing sources is very important and since certain sites go through purges, I’d like to be informed if this goes down so I can rectify it if I can. Thanks!)

Transcript: (embellishment added)

Narrator: “So let’s get back to reality for a minute. Is a vaccine against religious fundamentalism even possible?”

Same FunVax scientist from leaked 2005 footage: “So somebody asked me to design a vaccine for religious fundamentalism or fanaticism, uh, basically what I would do is to try to better understand why people are fanatical. Why do they have extreme behavior? Uh, it’s pretty clear these days that, that all behavior results from, uh, activity of our own brains. And so there must be pathways that are important in generating this kind of behavior.”

Dean Hamer (worked as director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit and as an independent research at the NIH): “So if indeed spirituality is this series of chemical reactions in the brain, and if it can be enhanced by certain types of drug, then, naturally it follows that it can be inhibited as well. ‘Cause for every activator there must be an inhibitor. And so I can easily imagine under the right circumstances, the right stimuli, or the right drugs, and the right inhibitors, might have some effect on a person’s spirituality.

At least in the short run. Whether or not that would have a long term effect, or people would undergo homeostasis and alter, uh, is an open question. We really don’t know the answer to that.”

FunVax scientist: “It would be quite useful to eliminate some of the fanatical, um… religious nuts in the world. And I think that, that, um, maybe a vaccine would be the way to do that. It’s difficult to know how successful it would be, but it’s certainly an interesting idea. From the point of view of a, uh, medical professional, um, the question of spreading a virus that is – has not been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, is a major issue.

For additional investigation and information into this VMAT2 / vaccine proposal, please visit:

FUNVAX – Revisited
Interview With Joey Lambardi About The Fundamentalism Vaccine (FunVax)
Geneticist claims to have found ‘God gene’ in humans

Dean Hamer “The GOD Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into Our Genes” (published in 2004)

TIME magazine “THE GOD GENE” (October 25, 2004 edition)

Proof is right in front of your eyes. Now whether you choose to believe “fact-checking” and “debunking” websites, that are EMPLOYED/FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED by the very same organizations that are under question, or whether you decide to give the honest journalists/researchers/concerned citizens trying to expose the corruption a try (and keep an open mind) remains up to you.

“You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.”

“You can lead a person to the facts, but you can’t make him believe it.”

3. Who is a “religious fanatic”? Sounds like it could be a cult to me…

Now that brings me to, how do you label a “religious fundmentalist”? Whose right is it to determine who is a “religious nut” – a label graciously attributed by a scientist whom we’re all supposed to trust because we’re always told to “trust the science” and “trust the experts”, and who also believes it would be, and again I quote, “quite useful to eliminate some (of them)”?

What if I were to label this scientist and Dean Hamer, and all other researchers/scientists who aim to discover everything there is to know about humanity, life and the world, and who would go to such great lengths that upset the moral, ethical boundaries that no one should ever cross all in the “name of science”, as a “science fundamentalist”, who are just as damaging, if not EVEN MORE SO, than these religious fanatics?

Can we honestly say that scientists/inventors have not done horrific crimes “all in the name of science”? (That was a rhetorical question.)

Now besides just mentioning scientists and religious fanatics, I also have to bring up other cult-like organizations.

Michael Aquino (founder of the Temple of Set) is a very recognizable name involved in the US military/pentagon and engaged in the MK-ultra mind control experiments, as well as satanic practices, with a notable connection to Anton LaVey. (Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military / The Satanic Subversion Of The United States Military)

Jack Parsons is another popular name (founder of NASA) who had extensive ties to the occult and a fascination with Aleister Crowley. (The Occult Rocket Scientist Who Conjured Spirits with L. Ron Hubbard)

Yet, there are still people who refuse to believe that something untoward may be happening right within our government organizations. Claiming that just because someone believes in “satan” or “lucifer”, doesn’t mean they’re engaging in wicked, evil acts. Even when there are witness testimonies describing their horrible encounters with these types of cult.

Svali (raised in a corrupt cult society)

A thorough exposé into the life of an alleged Illuminati member can be found here: Svali Speaks

In it, she details how she grew up in a cult – how they are raised, how she was trained to raise others, the tragic situations that are perpetuated in the “family” in order to essentially brainwash the members into blindly following orders and remaining loyal to their cause.

It is a horrific look into how children are treated in this organization, creating dissociative identity disorders that the higher members of the cult can control and call on through certain predetermined methods.

Here are some key excerpts from a detailed e-mail correspondence, purportedly between Svali and H.J. Springer (editor of centrexnews) in 2000:

2000

(all quotes by Svali)
“The Illuminati is a group that practices a form of faith known as “enlightenment”. It is Luciferian, and they teach their followers that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism. They have taken what they consider the “best” of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline. Many groups at the local level worship ancient deities such as “El”, “Baal”, and “Ashtarte”, as well as “Isis and Osiris” and “Set”.”

“The national council [consists of] influential bankers with old money such as: The Rockefellers, the Mellon family, the Carnegie family, the Rothschild family, etc.”

(after a ritualistic child sacrifice): “Afterwards, the man in scarlet, he had a huge golden ring on his hand. He came over to the center of the room. He had each of the people that were swearing that day go forward and kneel before him and kiss his ring, and [I had to ] swear my allegiance to the New Order, to the New World Order for all … until my death.”

“The Freemasons and the Illuminati are hand in glove. I don’t care if this steps on any toes, it’s a fact. The Masonic temple at Alexandria, Virginia (the city itself was named after Alexandria, Egypt, and is a hotbed of Illuminati activity) is a centre in the Washington, DC area for Illuminati scholarship and teaching.”

“Are all Masons Illuminati? No, especially at the lower levels, I believe they know nothing of the practices that occur in the middle of the night in the larger temples.”

“Many of the administrators and directors at the FBI are also Illuminists. The CIA helped bring over German scientists after WWII. Many of these were also Illuminati leaders in their own country, and they were welcomed with open arms by the U.S. group. They also funnelled all information they were learning to the Illuminati. The scientists that ran MK-Ultra and other governmental mind control programs were Illuminists brought over from Nazi Germany.”

“Remember those studies that stated that “TV violence doesn’t affect children’s behaviour” years ago? Guess who funded them? They are a bunch of bullcrud. What a person watches DOES influence them, and this is well known by the behaviourists in the group. In fact, they know that TV is a tool that they purposely use to influence “the masses”. It cannot create a total personality change in the average citizen, but it can desensitize us increasingly to violence, pornography and the occult, and influence the perceptions of young children.”

“The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does not want to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way. The Franklin case is a point. How much evidence has come out? Or the MK-ULTRA documents that have been declassified, shown as real, and people ignore it.”

” The Illuminists don’t care who prints this stuff or if they are “exposed”, because they are counting on the majority not believing it, having done a pretty good job with a media blitz campaign. Seen any articles in Newsweek or Time that addresses this other than as a laughable conspiracy theory? Guess who owns Time-Warner?

I have heard them laughing about this very thing in leadership meetings five years ago, and I doubt their attitude has changed much since then.”

For a full account, please visit: Exclusive Interview with Ex-Illuminati Bloodline Programmer/Trainer Svali

There is also the interview Svali did with Investigative Journal Greg Szymanski in 2006 that you could listen to below.

RELATED:  CIA Mind Control Experiments | Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, More

The Vatican is also HUGELY implicated in initiating these satanic rituals. Greg Szymanski, the same man who interviewed Svali in 2006, published this article highlighting the suspicious activity and some high profile individuals involved with the Vatican rituals: Satanic Black Masses at the Vatican

Now, while there are other whistleblowers and former members that have spoken out against this indoctrination/corrupt society, I want to mention a specific gentleman who was not necessarily born into a cult, but was introduced to one when he was an influential criminal broker (updated: labeled as a banker but was not – he was a self-professed criminal entrepreneur) at the time, before he left this system after a harrowing encounter.

4. Ronald Bernard’s testimony: The attack on children

Ronald Bernard was a former criminal dealer who was introduced into the dark underworld by some colleagues who thought he was ready to be inducted into their satanic rituals. Little did they know, this would instead be the breaking point for Ronald, and allowed him to tap into the light he had within himself in order to leave this corrupted establishment, and pursue a life dedicated to spreading awareness and creating peaceful unity.

Below are a couple of videos with some excerpts of Ronald’s testimony, expressing the horrific reality of black mass and the egregious agenda of targeting our children to be raised in a corrupt society.

Ronald Bernard: “To put it carefully, most of these people followed a not very mainstream religion. So you have Catholics, Protestants, all sort of religions.

These people, most of them, were Luciferians.

And then you can say, religion is a fairy tale. God doesn’t exist. None of that is real. Well, for these people it is truth and reality, and they served something immaterial, what they called Lucifer.

And I also was in contact with those circles, only I laughed at it because to me they were just clients.

So I went to places called Churches of Satan.”

Interviewee: “So now we are talking about Satanism?”

Ronald: “Yes. So I visited these churches, just as a visitor, dropped by, and then they were doing their (un)Holy Mass with naked women and liquor and stuff, and it just amused me.

I didn’t believe in any of this stuff, and was far from convinced if any of this was real.”

Interviewee: “It was just a spectacle to you…”

Ronald: “Yes, in my opinion the darkness and evil is within the people themselves. I didn’t make the connection yet.

So I was a guest in those circles and it amused me greatly to see all those naked women and the other things. It was the good life.

But then at some point, I was invited, which is why I’m telling you all this, to participate in sacrifices, abroad.

(long pause)

That was the breaking point.

Children.”

Interviewee: “You were asked to do that…?”

Ronald: “Yes, and I couldn’t do that.”

Interviewee: “Would you like to stop for a moment, by the way?”

Ronald: “No. And then I started to slowly break down.

I lived through quite a lot as a child myself and this really touched me deeply.

Everything changed.

But that is the world I found myself in.”

(all quotes by Ronald Bernard)

“Because if we need to throw it all out there, because people stay where they are, that is the problem! The good people.

It is not the bad people, there are only a few, bad people do their thing, but it is the good people, worldwide, who do nothing. For a very long time, and I am a little angry with them.

Because when I was in my youth, between 15-20, via family, first line, I heard stories from nurses who were sent to India for a mission for development assistance over there.

Those people… I am trying to control myself.

Those people, were burnout after four or five years, completely traumatized, nurses, back in the Netherlands. No one was allowed to know.

But what was this all about? Children, again. Every time – children!

Organ trafficking.

We just think it is normal for a baby to be saved, but where do these organs come from?

And those children are still alive the moment they remove their organs. Those nurses could not cope with it anymore. India.

I am not sure if this is still going on right now. World, stand up! Go, find out!

Organ trafficking! Children! No one is talking about that. No one is taking action.

Those satanists – f*ck them! That is just a pathetic tiny little group. Organ trafficking worldwide. The god Mammon.

And I can testify – start with damaging little children from early on, and your world becomes even sicker.”

Source: Ronald Bernard – About child organ harvesting – Dutch with subs

5. Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Mr. Ronald Bernard makes numerous references to these Protocols, stating that most of these dark agendas we see going on in our world today can be found in this book.

According to the link he provided us, where you can read the whole English translation: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, this book was “first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends.”

The introduction from this file also states the following, “The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes.

Mr. Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:

“The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.”

I am not going to attempt to verify who is wholly responsible for these protocols. Whether they are a “forgery” or a “psyop”, a legitimate code, or what have you.

But I will highlight some of the more impertinent parts of this publication (again, written back in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s), that is extremely unsettling when comparing it to today’s current affairs.

1897

(all quotes from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion)

Economic Wars / DESTRUCTIVE EDUCATION: “2. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world.”

5. In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the GOYIM States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand GOYIM.”

Materialism Replaces Religion / WE SHALL DESTROY GOD: “3. But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity…

With such a faith as this a people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon earth. This is the reason why IT IS INDISPENSABLE FOR US TO UNDERMINE ALL FAITH, TO TEAR OUT OF THE MIND OF THE “GOYIM” THE VERY PRINCIPLE OF GOD-HEAD AND THE SPIRIT, AND TO PUT IN ITS PLACE ARITHMETICAL CALCULATIONS AND MATERIAL NEEDS.”

Control of the Press / WE CONTROL THE PRESS: “4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.”

Distractions / WE DECEIVE WORKERS: “In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about WE FURTHER DISTRACT THEM WITH AMUSEMENTS, GAMES, PASTIMES, PASSIONS, PEOPLE’S PALACES …. SOON WE SHALL BEGIN THROUGH THE PRESS TO PROPOSE COMPETITIONS IN ART, IN SPORT IN ALL KINDS: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought …”

Ruthless Suppression / GENTILES ARE CATTLE: 9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS

I want to bring up another interesting ideology that these “learned elders” possess, and it is the following:

Ruthless Suppression  GENTILES ARE CATTLE:11. In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world.”

Now, what’s fascinating to me, is the stark contrast in their belief structure, that they consider themselves “higher quality of humanness” and that nature “destined us to guide and rule the world”, yet even by their own admission have committed so many atrocities not only against “goyim”, but others of their kind (“chosen people”) as well.

And their insistence that their authority to rule and control should not be contested and one of their main roles in humanity is to strip away other people’s freedom – and their strange idolatry to gold, which in their mind, gives them the right to control the world:

Power of Gold:2. IN OUR HANDS IS THE GREATEST POWER OF OUR DAY – GOLD: IN TWO DAYS WE CAN PROCURE FROM OUR STOREHOUSES ANY QUANTITY WE MAY PLEASE.

3. Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true wellbeing – the bringing of everything into order?

Then compare that with WHO/WHAT they’re trying to stamp out (Christianity, Christ, spirituality), and it posits a disturbing picture that the “God” they serve, is not the same one that believers in Jesus Christ know as the Supreme Creator.

Their idolatry for gold, their self-righteous belief that in order to serve the greater good (good for whom?) they must engage in sacrifices and no-holds barred killing of those they deem necessary, even if it’s their own people; their goal to spread as much chaos, division and violence as they possibly can in an attempt to control the masses – their indoctrination of not only their own children, but the pressure to exert their own beliefs onto other people as well – yet they still call the goyim the brutes?

And what separates these protocols from, say, the Bible, for instance?

Well, just as a small example:

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Out of 62 pages (not including forwards/introductions, etc.) of rather large text:

Love is mentioned all of 2 times.

Since I have room, here are the contexts of which it is mentioned:

“2. As the majority of conspirators act out of love for the game…”

“12. That the people may know and love their king, it is indispensable for him to converse in the market-places with his people. This ensures the necessary clinching of the two forces which are now divided one from another by us by the terror.”

Power is mentioned a whopping 70 times. In 62 pages.

Bible

Out of ~1,000-2,000 pages (depending on size of font and translation):

Love is mentioned 310 times.

Conversely, the protocols would have had to mention the word “love” 9-10 times to match with the scripture. Of course, love is not their goal…

To think of it this way, “love” is mentioned 4-5 TIMES MORE in the Bible. And that’s using the most pages of 2,000. If it was 1,000, then the protocols would have had to mention the word love ~19 times.

Power, on the other hand, is mentioned 272 times in the Bible.

To put that into further perspective, the Bible would have had to mention “power” 2,258 times to match what was in the protocols. Out of 2,000 pages.

An even smaller, but perhaps more impactful, example…

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

To paraphrase: “Kill those who stand in our way.”

Bible:

Jesus Christ: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.”John 13:34

Hm… I think I can see a difference.

6. Jacques Attali: From cannibalism, to genetically modifying, implanting chips, to buying and selling children

1981

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On cannibalism: ” – we start from cannibalism and return to it. In short, we can interpret the whole of industrial history as a machine for translating the founding cannibalism, the first relationship to evil, where men eat men, into industrial cannibalism, where men become commodities that eat commodities.”

On genetically modifying/creating clones/hybrids: “In other words, with genetic engineering we could gradually create the conditions for humanity to assume itself freely, but collectively, or else create the conditions for a new commodity, genetic this time, which would be made up of copies of humans sold to humans, chimeras or hybrids used as slaves, robots, means of work…”

On implants: “It is planned to develop small implants in the body that can release hormones and active substances in target organs.”

On buying and selling children: “This idea corresponds entirely to an economic evolution in the sense that the woman or the couple will become part of the division of labour and general production. Thus it will be possible to buy children in the same way as one buys “peanuts” or a television set.”

“The only way to resolve this contradiction is to imagine that society could buy children from a family that would be paid in return. I am not thinking of family allowances, which are weak incentives. A family would agree to have many children if the state guaranteed them substantial progressive allowances on the one hand and full responsibility for the material life of each child on the other. In this scheme, the child would become a kind of bargaining chip in the relationship between the individual and the community.”

Source: The 1981 Michel Salomon – Jacques Attali interview

1981

(these quotes are making its way around the internet of Attali stating that “they” want to euthanize the “useless and old”. Although there ARE implications of this from Attali’s writing/interviews, I could not provide a verifiable source for these specific quotes, so please keep this in mind.)

Jacques Attali: “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.

Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!

We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.

We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”

Source: Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless

2011

(all quotes by Jacques Attali)

On creating new species/human hybrids and nanotechnology: “Further still, we will create new species, chimeras, capable of operating in difficult environments, radioactive for example, or replace men in battle. And even supreme transgression, to equip animals with a brain similar to the human brain. A little later, the meeting of computing science, genomics, nanotechnology and neurosciences will allow man to create other species, ultra-human, super-human.”

On justifying science experiments and getting rid of God: “Let us not hope to put a stop to it. Unless some unlikely world police, makes a shrine of the genome, a place will always be found to conduct these experiments, inexpensive, justifying them by the promise of curing rare diseases or extending human life expectancy. And even if the West resists it, emerging countries, from Argentina to China, via Brazil and tomorrow Nigeria and Indonesia, will welcome desperate researchers. After getting rid of God, man will have gotten rid of himself.”

Source: https://www.attali.com/en/society/human-more-than-human/ (June 12, 2011)

For additional reading that touches upon other topics that Attali has “predicted” that is currently happening, please visit:

“You are Damaged and Only We Can Repair You”
Illuminati Insider foretold Migrants, Surveillance, Mechanical Procreation

There’s actually more that I wanted to add, including Serge Monast / Blue Beam Project, Aldous Huxley, the Committee of 300, Georgia Guidestones, etc., but this post is getting quite long-winded enough already. I may end up doing a part 2 on this topic.

One thing that I did not realize would be a common factor in ALL of these “conspiracy theories” that are (and have been for a long time) carried out during our timeline, is the mention of God, spirituality, the soul… That was honestly not my intention and it was not something I actively sought to include.

My initial spur to create this post was to show how a scheme to depopulate and control the world either by injecting everyone with a virus/disease/illness/vaccine and/or through wars, mass chaos, corruption, etc. was already planned for a VERY LONG time.

Some may not be aware, simply because they are wrapped up in their own life (wake up, eat, work, tv, maybe socialize, sleep, repeat) and so this whole topic is lost on them. Especially when we’re indoctrinated as little children to trusting teachers, trusting preachers, trusting the government, trusting the news, trusting doctors, trusting law enforcement, trusting day care workers… I could go on and on.

Then there is the matter of what we are taught in schools. Yes education is important, but is it really necessary to engage in advanced math/algebra when basic math will suffice in most arenas of our life – unless you are set to pursue a career directly involving this subject? Not to mention the completely incorrect things we were taught in schools – such as how Thanksgiving tradition started, George Washington’s history, Christopher Columbus discovering America – and again, I could go on and on. Now they are changing our education system to include even more atrocious and harmful systemic doctrines.

Instead, a crucial subject matter should be to teach our children “critical thinking” and how to formulate our own thoughts and data gathering to come to educated conclusions. Since our world has been inundated with “fake news” and “misinformation” everywhere we turn, especially coming from an establishment whose sole purpose originally was to give us REAL, accurate news – and who most of us were ingrained to trust in, it is essential that people are able to look beyond this manipulation tactic, and finally think for themselves.

It is also necessary to teach children (and the whole world) about our spirituality and the importance of compassion and morality, so that these agendas to create chaos and division and horrific science experiments won’t work.

As it is, since our societal foundation has been built out of lies upon lies, AND fear – which is another huge topic, it is extremely hard for people to break out of this system and realize that a lot of the world governments DO NOT have our best interest in mind. Despite what they teach in schools and show on media. Even if the original purpose of the government was to protect their country, it is no longer the case in some areas. They have been infiltrated and controlled by immoral organizations, and it’s prudent that we wake up to this fact and start making changes to address this.

When we can realize that there is a hidden/dark goal to invade and disrupt all aspects of our lives in order to dominate and control free thinking and freedom itself, even our very own spirituality and consciousness, maybe we can finally step out of this implemented system and start better serving our fellow beings.

One last quote, very important and VERY relevant in today’s lost and confused world:
1917

“It is not a bad thing to know these things, which are ingredients of reality. They must be seriously considered. And one is guided to develop something of a nose for reality when one takes up anthroposophy, whilst the materialistic education people have today, with innumerable channels opening into it from the Press, is designed to point not to the realities but to something which is cloaked in all kinds of slogans. And if someone does wake up, as Delaisi did, and writes about how things really are, how many people get to know about it? How many people will listen? They cannot listen, for it is buried by — well, by a life that again is ruled by the Press.”

Source: Rudolf Steiner (1917) Fall of the Spirits of Darkness | Fall/Darkness: Lecture 14: Into the Future

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Andrea Spallanzani from Pixabay

Research on Demand

Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
A Poison to “Destroy Bodies and Rot Souls”? | Is This a 900 Year Old Prophecy Predicting the Future? - Even if we are warned of the future, will we believe it? And even if we did, can we stop/change it?
The Tragedy at Astroworld: Travis Scott, Demonic Imagery, and Seemingly Coordinated Events – Was This Planned? - As more information comes out, one has to wonder: are the police complicit? Or just covering up for a failed response?
Taking a Look Back at the 2012 Olympics London Closing Ceremony: Does it Hold Secrets to What’s Going on in the World? - The world has been blind-sided for centuries, while underhanded organizations operate behind the curtain.
Are the Vaccines Affecting Our Spirituality? | There May be More to it Than We Think - Father Savvas Agioritis shares testimonies of spiritual decline after taking the vaccines.
Research Into the Jews / Talmud | Pt. 1 - A (long) look into another's religion.
Important Messages About Humanity/Civilizations from a High-Ranking Shaman | Credo Mutwa - Incredible information from a respected Spiritual Leader.
Another Fake Vaccination – This Time with Chris Tucker? - More deception when it comes to the covid vaccine.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

Are You Racist? If You’re White, You’re Going to be Told You Are.

No matter how you really feel.

I’m not sure where this ever pervasive assumption that all white people are racist, even if you know you’re not, developed from, but to say that it’s not an issue in today’s society is undermining the root cause of division and hostility we see all around us. (Or at least, it seems as if they’re TRYING to cause division and hostility in us.)

I think many of us know by now about the unbelievable and, quite frankly, ridiculous, on-line seminar that coca-cola made available for its workers. With such lovely sentiments as this:

Wow. If this isn’t the definition of racism, I don’t know what is.

The author of this seminar, Robin DiAngelo (although she is now contesting that she has written this – but you can check out the video where she calls white people “difficult” and “a-holes” here (starting @ 2:09) as well as some of her other biased assumptions – so take that for what it’s worth), claims that to be white is to be:

– oppressive
– arrogant
– certain
– defensive
– ignorant
– less humble than everyone else
– white people don’t listen
– white people don’t believe (believe what?)
– apathetic
– participate in white solidarity

And then she has the audacity to accuse white people of being socialized to believe that being white is superior to, literally, anyone else. If children are being raised into thinking that they’re “superior” than other races, than that is the matter of parenting, social conditioning, and the education system. There are certainly occurrences of upbringing that exposes children to separation and division, which most definitely should be addressed, but to incriminate EVERYONE as a whole based on these cases is participating in stereotyping and biased (false) assumptions.

I don’t know about you, but I certainly wasn’t conditioned to think one way or another about matters of skin color. I can’t speak for others, of course, but in my life, I was raised to not judge people based on race, looks, skin color, etc. Even outside of home, in schools and stores, etc. I didn’t even think about making judgements between one group of people and the next. We are all people, and all deserve love and respect.

To say that I come from very diverse ethnic groups is putting it mildly. My direct and extended family and friends are composed of Asians, blacks, Mexicans, whites, mixed-races, etc. I don’t make it a point to know everyone’s genealogy or ethnic/cultural background because it’s who they are as a person, as an individual, their personality that matters to me.

My childhood friends consisted of an eclectic group, running the gamut of: blonde cheerleader, Mexican goth girl, smart black guy, emo boy, prankster red-headed kid, myself as the shy girl – did I care about anyone’s ethnic background or skin color? lol No. I adored them all the same. Did I ever think I was better than them because of the difference of skin color? Again, no.

“A concerned NYC parent summed up this orchestrated descent into de facto apartheid. “I grew up partly in New York on the Upper West Side and when I was young, you’d see all these kids playing in the yard at recess — black, white, Hispanic, Asian, whatever — and they all got along great,” he writes. “Now you have the schools teaching white kids they should feel guilty and that black kids should resent them.”

Racists Masquerading as Educators

Growing up, my media crushes included some of the following (just to show the diverse range of who I was attracted to – most of them due to their character’s personality)

He makes me laugh. What can I say? I love some good (and sometimes awful) puns.

(Lee Ki-woo)
His character was a bit arrogant, but by no means a bad person; and still sympathetic.
(Mario Casas as anyone)
He’s a great actor and I enjoy watching him no matter what character he plays.
(Alfred Molina as Doc Ock)
I appreciate a bad (misunderstood?) guy turned good.

Who wouldn’t adore a man who gets amused with pictures of poodles on checks?

(Tom Hiddleston as Loki)
White (and sometimes blue) / Bad (and sometimes good) – tricky trickster is compelling.

Hisham Tawfiq

(Hisham Tawfiq as Dembe)
I love his stoic yet touching portrayal of a dedicated, loyal bodyguard and devoted friend.

Hm… I see skinny (skeletal, actually…), Asian, Spanish, American, English, (headless?), white, blue, black… it’s almost as if race and skin color don’t matter to me. Imagine that.

I’ve dated blacks, Mexicans, whites, short, tall, skinny, stout… I also teach my son not to judge based on skin color. And not to judge on looks at all.

How?

By example. I treat everyone equally. I don’t make it a point to mention skin color, nationality, etc. And he doesn’t either. His favorite teacher is a black lady; he has friends that are of many different races and colors.

Of course you don’t have to believe me since this is all anecdotal, but seeing as how I’ve been actively exposing corrupt agencies for aiming at black people with their suspected depopulation agenda (looking at you Margaret Sanger/Planned Parenthood/Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, “(untested) covid vaccines should go to black people first and many other people of color”/Tuskegee Syphilis experiment, etc. – unironically all of which are white people who have initiated these agendas) then I don’t really feel the need to keep defending myself.

But here is this lady, DiAngelo, presuming to know how every single white person was socialized and raised. Here is a snippet from her very own site on what she’s all about:

From incisive and wide-ranging critiques of how white folks deflect, deny, and evade the topic of racism, and the implications of our own racial identity and position, to an absolutely on-point interrogation of how racism and whiteness influence the larger educational process,

Huh. It sounds like a “her” problem and not everyone else’s. Maybe SHE was raised with these beliefs and she’s trying to break out of it, but to imply that every single white person is arrogant, ignorant, etc., etc. is JUDGING PEOPLE BASED ON THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN. 

Unlike what certain groups believe, the need for some to particularly point out how racist white people are and that they just don’t know it, is quite possibly the most inane concept I’ve ever heard. And to expect people of any nationality or race to be ashamed of who they are based solely on their skin color is deliberately steering people towards EXCLUSION instead of INCLUSION, like they’re trying to make people believe.

Am I saying that some people weren’t born with the same ideology as DiAngelo? Certainly not. Am I saying that racism and stereotyping doesn’t exist? Again, certainly not. But what I am saying is that pressuring people to think that they should feel one way just because someone says so and assumes so just because of the color of their skin, seems to me the very definition of racism and deliberately aimed at creating more division and more chaos.

And I am saying that the approach that some people and industries are implementing, such as:

“I know! The best way to end racism is to mention it at every single turn! No matter we go, let’s mention black, white, supremacy, privilege, etc., etc., etc.! Let’s mention it in our schools. Let’s mention it in our jobs. Let’s mention it all over social media. Let’s even tell black people that they’re not black enough if they don’t think or act a particular way! And if they’re white, let’s make them state just how white they are, so we can judge them based on their own perception of whiteness. It’s perfect!”

is not working out as much as they’d hope.

This is sad. It’s sad that this is what’s allowed to be taught in schools. How about instead of teaching children that we should rate our whiteness or blackness, or asianness, or anything like that, that we just treat each other with kindness and respect? Why are we specifically highlighting our skin color and teaching children to notice this instead of just including everyone no matter who they are or what they look like? This is highly disturbing to me and it’s a belief system that can only inflict more doubt and damage rather than getting everyone together on the same page. As a matter of fact, all of these accusations of racism and indoctrination in schools are doing the complete opposite of what they’re “allegedly” trying to achieve.

It’s unbelievable that huge corporations like coca-cola will pay for this type of segregation seminar.

And it must come as a shock to Robin DiAngelo when you have a black lady who understands the repercussions that this type of harmful doctrine imposes on others:

“If a corporate company sent around a training kit instructing black people how to “be less black”, the world would implode and lawsuits would follow.

I genuinely hope these employees sue @CocaCola
for blatant racism and discrimination.”

@RealCandaceO

But apparently according to DiAngelo, Candace Owens just needs to accept that all whites are racist and experience white privilege, and Candace should play the victim card like every black person and accuse whites of denying their inherent racism and privilege.

And whatever happened to these very wise words from this well-respected black man?:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.


one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.


And when this happens, and when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:

Free at last. Free at last. Thank God Almighty, we are free at last.

When we suffer from oppression, even an illusion of oppression, these immortalized words can’t be realized. When we keep having segregation issues thrust upon us and our children, instead of understanding each other and respecting each other for who we are and our differences, when we keep regressing back to the past instead of making a change for the future – then we will be stuck with an ever-present perpetual division and animosity of others simply due to the color of our skin.

No matter what Robin DiAngelo or anyone else tries to make it seem, not every white person is born with the belief that they are better than any other race. And anyone who surmises that we’re mistaken and that we just haven’t owned up to our white supremacy is severely misled and/or delusional.

With all of this being said, please don’t let a person of any race try to psychologically manipulate you into making you believe that you’re the bad guy. If you do realize that you may be participating in discrimination or prejudice, then by all means, please look within and learn to practice appreciation and love and patience with those that are different than you. If, however, you know that this doesn’t apply to you, then do not cave into societal pressure and apologize for your skin color. We will ultimately not be judged by our looks, but by what’s in our hearts.

If you have suffered at the hands of discrimination, inequality, prejudice, racism or anything of the like, then I truly am sorry and hope with every fiber of my being that we as a collective whole can move past this and look beyond what we are naturally born into. I find every race, ethnicity, culture, skin color etc. worthy of life, love and freedom and wish for a united, benevolent society.

And if Robin DiAngelo and others like her are legitimately suffering from a shameful background of white privilege and racism, then I feel for her and hope she is able to address it and forgive herself and others for perpetrating it. And hope that she learns to rise above it and grow to be more inclusive and compassionate. But to impose her ideologies unnecessarily on others due to her own upbringing and/or guilt is a fruitless and harmful endeavor. (And that’s, of course, if this isn’t an intentional agenda to begin with.)

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay

Get an Earful

The 5G Roll Out: EMF Radiation, Devastating Health Impacts, Social and Economic Implications. Crimes Against Humanity? - What are the real effects of 5G radiation? & "Why is 5G Important for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?"
Is This Post Legitimately Detailing a Global Government Plan Using COVID as the Catalyst? | If So, It May be Related to a Previous Genocide Experiment - "THE PLAN is essentially to turn every citizen of every country, violently against their own government."
The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids. “Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability” - "The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection."
Could an Illusion be SO Real – That it Tricks Our Very Senses? | Technology/Studies Shows it’s Possible - While virtual reality could be a dangerous enterprise - our own minds pose even more important concerns.
Sofia Smallstorm Warned of DNA Genetic Altering and the Transhumanist Agenda Back in 2011 - "- self-replicating nanotechnology will infuse everything around us with itself."
Dr. Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna Connects the “Vaccine” Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology to the Great Reset/Transhumanism Agenda - Graphene oxide can map our brain, and "collect information such as memories, local thoughts, sensations, emotions, or feelings."