History is Repeating Itself: Fauci Was Accused of Genocide Almost 30 Years Ago

“The Greatest Lie Ever Told” …until now.

The very one and the same, Dr. Fauci, our coronavirus “expert”, has been accused of perpetuating a lie to the public surrounding infectious diseases not only currently (literally RIGHT NOW), but was also accused of practically the same thing almost 30 years ago.

The malpractice of using false PCR tests… raising alarm bells on a new “dangerous virus” – that was embellished for the sake of proposing a cure/not cure to the public, and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Sound familiar?

What began as a supposed epidemic of an AIDS outbreak back in the 1980’s to the 1990’s, Fauci has been called out by numerous sources for elaborating/manufacturing this lie.

One well-known figure who has spoken openly about Fauci’s fraudulent activities is Dr. Kary Mullis, who had no bones about picking a debate with the supposed expert.

I have cited this excerpt before, but it so relevant and significant, that I feel it necessary to add here again for reference:

PCR Inventory Kary Mullis on “Dr” Fauci:

He should not be in the position like he’s in.

Those guys have got an agenda. Which is not, what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to – and they smugly – like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

“You can’t expect the sheep, to really respect the best and the brightest. They don’t know the difference, really. I mean, I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. I mean, that’s a problem, that’s a main problem, actually with science, I’d say in this century, because scientists being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it.”

President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was, from the other side, to come down there and balance my – because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell me the other side. But Fauci didn’t want to do it…

In the end, “Nightline” ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.

The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didn’t fulfill Mullis’ ultimate fantasy. “What ABC needs to do,” says Mullis, “is talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that they’re assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.

But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as he’s always done.

“I know he will,” Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. “But you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, ‘This is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,’ and let the cameras follow. If people think I’m a crazy person, that’s okay. But here’s a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. It’s a visual thing. I’m not unwilling to do something like that.”

He pauses, then continues. “And I don’t care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.”

(Kary Mullis)
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus

As Celia Farber, the interviewer, mentions: “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.”

Robert Willner: Calls out Fauci by name for being a FRAUD

Another noted doctor, who wrote the book “Deadly Deception”, dealing with the so-called AIDS epidemic and the huge corruption/collusion to mislead the public, which you can read here:

Deadly Deception by Robert Willner

“THERE IS NO EPIDEMIC”

“YOU ARE THE VICTIM OF A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR FRAUD”

“An incredible story of the arrogance, ignorance, corruption, and deception of establishment medicine, the pharmaceutical industry and agencies of the U.S. Government. A factual account, completely documented, of the most horrendous and deadly scientific fraud in history.”

had this to say about the Director of the NIH and current head of the coronavirus taskforce, and the insidious deceitful agendas committed at the time during the AIDS scandal:

The below quotes are several excerpts with the corresponding timestamps of Robert Willner’s perspective of Fauci and the pandemic fraud of the century at that time – (in which we now have “conveniently” Fauci again spearheading the current fraud of this century. NOT A COINCIDENCE.)

Robert Willner exposing the truth

@4:00: “But I am against lying to our young people. I am against causing death and destruction through that lie. I am against telling a lie to the young people so that they can continue in other behaviors which are truly causing AIDS.

Now you’ve got to ask yourself, the reason that I’m here today. And it’s been suggested that I’m here to sell a book. Called Deadly Deception. There’s only two ways that you can get the truth to people. By your own words out of your own mouth, and by putting them on paper. And that’s the reason for the book.

We’re talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated, not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history.

Hitler would ENVY the job being done by the NIH

@5:00: “Today is December 7th. And I was uh… 12 years old when the attack on Pearl Harbor came. And I remember WW2 very well. And it’s a very significant day today. Because I see an incredible parallel between what is going on in the so-called AIDS epidemic, and what happened in the years preceding and resulting in WW2.

The great lie of Hitler. It’s amazing. I think he would envy the job being done by members of the National Institutes of Health. And even the media. Especially in this country.

I charge the media with part of the responsibility; and a very significant one, in a current holocaust. That can end up being worse than the one that occurred during WW2.”

Media “proving” a deadly virus / but not scientists

@6:04: “When it was first announced that Dr. Robert Gallo had found the virus that probably caused AIDS, that announcement was made with Margaret Heckler in 1984 to the press and to the media, without one single scientific document appearing in any journal in the United States.

And as we know now, without any proof whatsoever, that the virus caused any disease.

The media picked up on it. For the sake of a story. And soon the virus that probably caused AIDS, was now the virus that caused AIDS. It was proven in the press. And nowhere else.

Now it’s interesting. A lot of questions are asked of me whenever I appear before the cameras, and do what some people have called “the stunt”, to sell books. – I’m from the planet Earth. I honestly believe that these people are from the planet Uranus. How anyone could suggest that I would stick myself with a virus that is supposedly deadly? For the purpose of selling a book; that’s complete insanity.”

Fauci guilty of genocide / killer drug

@7:24: “And I will put the lies of the individuals of the NIH, particularly Gallo and Fauci and [William] Haseltine and [Max] Essex, and the rest of these scoundrels, of the worst order. Criminals guilty of genocide, without a doubt. I invite them to take me to court! I wish Burroughs Wellcome would take me to court. Because they have been putting out a killer drug knowingly!

Dissenting expert opinions that go against the narrative

@8:03: “Now I’m not alone in what I’m doing here today. How does the press escape such obvious truths? Why would the finest virologist in the world, the most noted virologist, member of our National Academy of Sciences, Peter Duesberg, why would he put his entire career on the line? What did he have to gain? He’s already lost his laboratory. And his funding. They can’t take away his professorship because he’s tenured.

Why would a Charles A. Thomas, professor of Merit of Harvard say the same thing? Why would Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Virology last year, why would he stick his neck out? What did he have to gain? These are the questions reporters should be asking.

Deadly drugs causing acquired immunity deficiency

@9:32: “We have known what causes acquired immunity deficiency diseases for at least 70 years. It’s in the medical textbooks. It’s there for you to read.

Number one cause on the face of this Earth, is malnutrition and starvation. That’s Africa. Look to the headlines of the October 3rd issue of the London Times, Sunday Times last year [1993]. And inside headlines that screamed across 2 pages “The Plague That Never Was”.

@10:20: “There is no epidemic! It doesn’t exist!”

@10:54:Number two, is drugs. And don’t just think of street drugs. Because the number one cause of AIDS today is actually TWO medical drugs! AZT. A drug that was discovered in the 60’s as a chemotherapeutic drug for cancer. And was shelved because it was too toxic to treat cancer. A drug worse than cancer. Is being used to treat people who are immuno-suppressed.”

[Number three cause of AIDS], is radiation. Whether they worry about Chernobyl and Nagasaki and Hiroshima.”

Number four, is chemotherapy.

The most toxic chemo therapeutic drug of all times, AZT, is what they’re now using to treat AIDS.

Corruption of pharma drugs and sabotaged tests

@12:40: “But did anybody here bother to look at the insert, the paper that comes with the drug?

It’s a DNA terminator! It means it is a terminator! Just like the movie. It terminates life! You terminate DNA, you terminate life.”

“And they talk about side effects in the insert. When are you going to learn there is no such thing as a side effect in medicine? It’s an unwanted DIRECT effect! And you know what one of the unwanted direct effects of AZT is? Lymphoma! Cancer! One of the diseases of AIDS, as they call it.

Oh! Another so-called side effect? Which is really an unwanted direct effect? Pancytopenia. You need a definition? Pancytopenia.
Pan, “all”. Cyto, “cells”. Penia, “loss of”. Loss of all your cells. That’s AIDS. That is the definition of AIDS.

So AZT, by definition, by their own drug insert, causes AIDS. And NOBODY survives AZT. That will eventually lead to your death. And they’ve cut the dosage way down! Because it was killing them too fast. It’s like giving somebody a large dose of strychnine and they die within 5 minutes. And so the next person you give them a few drops of it and they last four or five days and you say, “Strychnine’s a wonderful drug. This person last 5 times longer.” This is the kind of thing they present to the world.”

NIH and CDC complicit in perpetrating mass fraud cover-up

@14:35:It is a scandal and a scam beyond belief. The virologists who are responsible for this, what do they have to gain? Now, I don’t know what Duesberg had to gain, or Charles A. Thomas, or Kary Mullis; he already got his Nobel Prize. Why does he come out and say? And he’s the one who found the test. The PCR reaction. And he said that there is no body of evidence that supports that the virus causes any disease whatsoever.

But what about the individuals who have perpetrated this lie? They are all multi-millionaires.

What do we have to say about the National Institutes of Health when a private laboratory, independent laboratory, found AZT to be 1,000 times more toxic than the laboratory of the NIH? We can understand a 5% error in the laboratory, even a 10% error – but a 10,000% error? Or a 100,000% error? That’s fraud.

And as I understand it, the word has gone out, and there is even documents and letters to prove it. That the CDC, the same organization that let blacks go untreated with syphilis, well-documented, just to see what would happen with the disease. The same organization who had to admit that they can’t give in on the AIDS thing, now, because nobody would ever be able to trust the government.”

“Science” and politicians – one in the same…

@16:17: “But “science” is acting no differently than politicians do. And now we have disease by politics.”

Premeditated patents and HIGHLY inaccurate tests

@16:25: “Isn’t it strange, that the same day or the day after, Robert Gallo filed for a test for HIV after it was announced? This sounds like premeditation. You mean he just happened to have this test available? And so the same day or the following day he files for a patent? He had a test. He was simply looking for some kind of a disease he wanted to apply it to.

And that test… 30,000 Russians who tested positive for HIV were then tested with another test that’s supposedly far more accurate to confirm the positivity. And 66 out of 30,000 proved to be positive. That means that the test HIV is 99.997% inaccurate. You want to take a test that’s 3 thousandths of a percent right? And you’re going to rely on that? But that’s what they’re doing to people out there. They’re taking a test that is not only invalid, it’s TOTALLY misleading!”

How Fauci believes an “epidemic” virus gets around

@18:09: “And of course, Fauci said, that you need, or when he was answering what I did, in Cleveland, a week ago, he said, “Well, he’s going to have to stick himself 300 times, to transmit the virus.” Where are you people in the press? 300 times?! To transmit a virus? You cannot have an epidemic under those circumstances!”

Fauci and Gallo engaging in name-calling instead of facing scientific queries

@20:21: “And if you hear an argument amongst politicians, and one calls the other names and doesn’t answer the specific charges, scientifically, who’s the liar?

Fauci and Gallo, instead of answering the scientific conflicts, and contradictions, that Dr. Duesberg so brilliantly pointed out, instead of answering them, they call him a homophobe. Can you imagine? I’ve been called a homophobe too.”

Viruses are apparently prejudice too…

@21:01: I wonder, I come here with a message of hope, to not only the gays, but to the blacks, and the hispanics, and the all the other outcasts of society, which strangely enough are the only groups that have been connected with the so-called AIDS. Because you see, if you belong to one of those groups, you got AIDS. But if you don’t belong to one of those groups, you get the respectable diagnosis of ‘you have tuberculosis’, ‘you have lymphoma’, ‘you have leukemia’, ‘you have kaposi sarcoma’, ‘pneumocystis pneumonia’, 30+ diseases!”

Suppressed from the media – just a propaganda machine

@22:33: “So every time I’ve stuck myself with a needle, I get calls from major television shows, by excited young people who want to tell the truth. Then I get a call three days later, telling me that it’s been nixed at a higher level.

That’s no surprise. After all, who am I fighting? Two drug industries. One, supposedly legitimate, and the other, illegitimate. And they do an awful lot of advertising. The supposedly legitimate ones. All those things out there that they sell for your colds and for everything else that’s a pharmaceutical industry, and they also put out prescription drugs, most of them. And they pull the purse strings. And so we have, a better propaganda machine in the United States, than Hitler had in his time.

Fauci and Gallo, along with their cohorts, getting paid to murder

@23:46: “The liars and killers, like Fauci, and Gallo, and Haseltine and Essex and Flossie Wong-Staal, and Margaret Fischl, these people are getting by with the lie and getting paid immense sums of money for it, and praise from the rest of the world. While they murder.”

The government/health agencies want to give us a vaccine – even if we’re immune to a virus

@32:03: “They [government/health agencies] just spent another 20 billion dollars in only 10 years time. And they’re asking for more. [after spending billions of dollars failing to find a cancer virus] And now they want to give us a vaccine! See? Oh, well they make money with that. They not only have a test for HIV, which by the way, is not for the virus, it’s for immunity. Like I say, “It’s the first disease in the history of medicine where you’re immune to it you’re going to die from it.”

But now, they want to give us a vaccine.”

Why would some scientists risk their reputation to speak against the narrative? – Maybe because they’re HONEST

@33:34: “And yet, you want to condemn me and say that I’m out for publicity? Well what is it that Peter Duesberg is out for? He held the reputation, and still amongst honest scientists as being the foremost virologist in the world. What is Kary Mullis out for? He just won the Nobel Prize. Why does he want to put at risk that incredibly marvelous reputation of being a Nobel Prize winner? Why would he put that at risk, unless maybe there’s still some honest scientists around. 

Now what about the rest of them out there?”

The lie is being perpetuated, by those who keep silent

@34:12: “You know, I often ask myself the question, if my children were still in school, and I had house payments to make, and I had to put them through school, etc., would I be doing what I’m doing today? I don’t think I’ve ever answered the question because I’m… I’m kind of afraid of what I might answer if I was going to answer honestly.

And he who is without sin shouldn’t be casting any stones. So I won’t cast the stones at the thousands and thousands and thousands of virologists out there who are going along with this scam. Because you see, they would be out of jobs if they dared criticize Margaret Heckler, or the heads of the NIH. They’d be out of jobs and they’d have families that they have to support. And futures that would be down the drain. You don’t cross the establishment. And so the lie is being perpetuated, by the silence.

And even Gallo, would say to the press in answer to the question, what does he have to say about Duesberg’s challenges? And he says, “Well, if we’re wrong, why do so many people believe us?” I mean, I can just see Hitler and his stormtroopers saying to the press, “If we’re wrong, why does everybody do what we tell them to do?”

The choice we all have to make

@36:46: “If enough of the honest ones would stand up and take that chance, if you all stand together, you make a statement. And you can do that in your press associations. Even though the people who own the newspapers and the television shows are afraid of losing their sponsors, you can at least keep your dignity. 

That’s the choice you have to make.”

We all make mistakes – but we can still be decent and compassionate to each other

@38:03: “There’s no dishonor in being gay and admitting that you’ve been on drugs. The decent human beings in this world will give you the support and help you. Like we help drug addicts of all followings, so to speak.

Those that will turn against you have turned against you anyway. Because of what you feel and what you are. And there are even some religious groups who have turned against the gays, and said it was God’s vengeance. How can you believe in a loving God and believe that that God would cause such a terrible disease amongst humans?

No, this is a man caused disease. But we all make mistakes in life. And that shouldn’t stop the compassion and the love and the understanding of decent human beings.”

The ‘greatest lie ever told’ by “health criminals”

@42:15: [while injecting himself with the blood of an AIDS positive gentleman] “I say to my friends, Fauci, and Gottlieb, and Galpin, and Gallo and all the rest of those criminals, that this is for the sake of humanity, and no other reason.”

“And this is in the hopes that it’ll save the lives of millions of individuals who will die because of the greatest lie ever told.”

“It’s real easy to create an epidemic.”

@47:51: “It’s real easy, it’s real simple, to create an epidemic. You simply take a bunch of diseases and put them under one heading, and then claim that one virus is responsible for it.”

The TRUTH will destroy the credibility of the NIH, CDC, FDA, etc.

@49:43: “It wasn’t suitable for a scoundrel, like Robert Gallo in the 1940’s – he wasn’t old enough, or maybe he was born just about that time, for somebody to come along and to pull off a scam of this magnitude.

And now they’re caught up in a maelstrom. Now if the truth gets out, yes, it will deal a blow to the credibility of the NIH, and the CDC, and the FDA, and the AMA, and my God it is sorely needed! That blow is necessary! To clean up the act.”

CDC: “You have AIDS even if you have not tested for HIV”

@01:04:04: “The CDC that let syphilitics untreated, when they had drugs that could have treated – just to observe, the same CDC has already admitted that between 40 and 60% of the cases listed in AIDS were not even tested for HIV. And not that it makes any difference because the test is meaningless.”

“A person can have HIV without developing AIDS, but it is not possible to have AIDS without first having HIV.”

HIV vs. AIDS: What is the difference?

Malfeasance/lies of the health industries. Men and women responsible belong in jail.

@01:06:41: “The lie is so compounded and so idiotic and so unbelievable that you literally have to fight your way out of the maze of these lies! They are all unadulterated lies! And the men responsible for them, and women, belong in jail.”

How does disease fester? And can we prevent it?

@01:12:34: “In the United States, in 1919, 18 million people died of the flu. My question is, why didn’t the other 92 million die? The answer to that, and every reporter owes it to their readers, is very simple. The bugs do not cause the disease, unless there’s a suitable terrain. And so the answer to all disease, is not to take a shotgun and blow a human being apart. But to simply prevent the disease to begin with, by living at peace and in harmony, not only with your fellow human beings but with every organism on this planet.”

Now for a quick comparative rundown between the AIDS epidemic around 30 years ago, and the covid situation we have now:

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana

Or, those who don’t learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.

We are LITERALLY, right now, in the middle of history repeating itself. And if we don’t become aware and alert to these heinous agendas, a repeat of the Holocaust may be looming on the horizon.

We can stop it by banding together, realizing that we are being lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE, and refuse to participate in this system. It takes courage and integrity, but as so many HONEST doctors and scientists, inventors, activists, virologists, even former ceo’s/founders of the vaccine companies (Michael Yeadon, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Reiner Fuellmich, Pierre Kory, Carrie Madej, Sherri Tenpenny, Dolores Cahill, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Sucharit Bhakdi, Andrew Wakefield, Simone Gold, Andrew Kaufman, Charles Hoffe, etc., etc., etc.) are in the forefront and risking their reputation to warn us that this coronavirus/vaccine agenda is not what it seems, and is a dangerous affront to humanity. They, just like Peter Duesberg, Charles A. Thomas, Robert Willner, Kary Mullis – all of these brave people came out into the public light to expose this corruption – which, unironically, also involved Anthony Fauci.

There ARE honest people getting the truth out. And their sincere efforts and dedication is appreciated beyond measure. But we NEED to listen. Or we will continue to be victims of this planned genocide that has been long in the making.

CDC, FDA Prepare Mass Distribution of a Merck/Sanofi Six-in-One Vaccine for Kids, Turning Blind Eye to Safety Signals

Egregious oversteps endangering children’s lives.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The FDA approved Vaxelis in late 2018, but only now is the shot being readied for widespread distribution — in Europe, where infants have been given six-in-one vaccines for years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the vaccines have been associated with reports of sudden infant death.

Since the mid-1980s, the number of childhood shots on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule has more than quadrupled. When parents express reluctance about turning their little ones into perpetual pin cushions, drug makers and doctors have a ready answer — combination vaccines that “simplify” the schedule by decreasing the number of injections administered.

This month marks the U.S. launch of the Merck/Sanofi joint-venture vaccine, Vaxelis, a six-in-one (hexavalent) combination vaccine that contains diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) components as well as components said to protect against polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B.

Public health officials optimistically believe that bundling all of these components into one shot will help close noncompliance loopholes and increase the likelihood that children will complete “all recommended vaccinations.”

Though Vaxelis is the nation’s first hexavalent injection, it joins other four- or five-in-one vaccines already on the CDC schedule. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Vaxelis in late 2018 — as a three-dose series for 2-, 4- and 6-month-old infants — but it is only now, two-and-a-half years later, that the shot is being readied for widespread distribution.

Warning signs were ignored

There are numerous warning signs that potent all-in-one vaccines are too much for immature immune systems to handle. Concerning safety signals have emerged not just for hexavalent but also pentavalent (five-in-one) vaccines.

In Europe, where infants have been given hexavalent vaccines for some years (including Vaxelis since 2016), the formulations have produced many troubling reports of sudden infant death.

Absurdly, none of the clinical studies assessing Vaxelis safety and efficacy conducted fair comparisons against an inert placebo. Instead, in the two U.S. clinical trials for Vaxelis, not only did investigators compare infants receiving Vaxelis to babies who received Sanofi’s five-in-one Pentacel — but babies in both groups also received rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines at the same time!

In this context, the CDC’s sales pitch to the public — and its claims that side effects are “usually mild” — cannot be considered credible.

Here are some of the other facts missing from the CDC’s communications:

  • In the two U.S. trials six infants died (slide #27) in the Vaxelis group (some after receiving just one dose); one infant also died in the “control” group that received five-in-one vaccines.
  • All six Vaxelis recipients died within six weeks of vaccination. This timing matches other published accounts of infant deaths “clustering” following hexavalent vaccination.
  • The reported causes of death for the infants who received Vaxelis included asphyxia, sepsis, fluid in the brain and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). These outcomes correspond to the types of adverse events reported following hexavalent vaccination in Europe.
  • Package inserts for other vaccines on the CDC schedule list similar causes of death, suggesting these fatal Vaxelis outcomes are plausibly associated with vaccination.
  • In the clinical trials, the rate of fever was notably higher in Vaxelis recipients even when compared to children receiving five-in-one vaccines (47% vs. 34%).

Juicing vaccine sales

In the no-liability context enjoyed by vaccine makers in the U.S., combination vaccines are already quite popular. In fact, market watchers and health economists praise the jumbo shots as being a catalyst for positive industry trends and a “key to commercial success.”

 

Thus, financial analysts expect Vaxelis to “garner significant patient share following its [U.S.] launch” — predicting that it will account for almost a third of U.S. DTaP vaccinations by 2028 — or $841 million in annual sales.

These predictions represent good news for Merck and Sanofi, two of the “big four” pharma giants that dominate the childhood vaccine market in the United States. Merck is already doing a booming vaccine business, recently reporting annual sales growth of 14.8% for its pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax 23) and 5.4% for its human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil-9.

However, Merck also faces proliferating Gardasil-related lawsuits — including legal actions alleging that the company knew about and ignored life-changing adverse events from the get-go, many of which (when not fatal) have involved autoimmunity and chronic pain. In fact, before the advent of emergency use COVID vaccines (responsible for an alarming escalation of vaccine-related adverse events), Gardasil had had “more side effects reported than all other vaccines combined.”

Sanofi, too, is embroiled in thousands of lawsuits worldwide — notably for its disastrous and sometimes fatal dengue vaccine. As with Merck, this has not dampened overall vaccine sales growth, which continues its strong upward trajectory, likely to be further strengthened by the U.S. Vaxelis rollout.

Although Sanofi has not been a front-runner in the COVID vaccine race, the company is currently running clinical trials for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines for both COVID and seasonal influenza.

Aluminum secrecy and grandfathered ingredients

Merck’s proprietary, “super-powered” aluminum adjuvant — amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) — which is believed to play a significant role in Gardasil’s risk profile, is also present in Vaxelis.

After Merck developed AAHS, it began to “preferentially” feature AAHS in its vaccines even though, as Danish scientists outlined last year, the company appears to have disregarded procedures ordinarily required for approval of new adjuvants.

According to the Danes, at the time AAHS appeared, it represented a “new type of aluminium adjuvant with excipients that [had] not been used earlier in [European Medicines Agency] authorised vaccines.” It should have been — but apparently was not — tested against an inert placebo. For this and other reasons, the Danish scientists question the ethical underpinnings of the Gardasil clinical trials.

In noting that Merck also “seems to have prevented independent studies of AAHS,” the Danes repeated a critique aired by world-famous aluminum expert Christopher Exley in 2018. In an extensive discussion of different aluminum-based adjuvants and their immunological mechanisms of action, Exley and co-authors emphasized the importance of studying aluminum adjuvants one by one, as each is “chemically and biologically dissimilar with concomitantly potentially distinct roles in vaccine-related adverse events.”

Concerningly, the Vaxelis liquid suspension is adjuvanted onto not just AAHS, but also another aluminum adjuvant — aluminum phosphate). The package insert disingenuously shorthands the combination of adjuvants as “aluminum salts.”

How this double whammy of aluminum (319 micrograms per vaccine dose) interacts with the vaccine’s six antigens, or Vaxelis’s numerous other ingredients, or the heavy aluminum load in other childhood vaccines is largely unknown.

According to the Vaxelis package insert, the vaccine also includes: polysorbate 80 (an ingredient flagged for its propensity to induce hypersensitivity reactions); glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde (problematic chemicals deemed necessary to inactivate pertussis toxin); bovine serum albumin (often harvested from bovine fetuses when female cows are found to be pregnant at slaughter); three different antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin B); ammonium thiocyanate (also a rust inhibitor, weedkiller and defoliant); and yeast protein (associated, notably in hepatitis B vaccines, with autoimmune reactions).

Regulatory loopholes allow manufacturers to “grandfather” ingredients into new vaccines if the components are already present in other licensed vaccines — regardless of how inadequate the original safety testing may have been.

Thus, Merck and Sanofi perceived no need to test Vaxelis for DNA-damaging or cancer-causing effects, and conducted no studies of the ingredients’ pharmokinetics (i.e., how the substances move “into, through, and out of the body”).

The main cautionary note sounded in the meager Vaxelis patient information sheet is to not give Vaxelis to children if they are “allergic to any of the ingredients.”

For thee and thee … but not for me?

The CDC seems to be particularly interested in ensuring that poor and non-white children get Vaxelis. The agency began laying the groundwork to offer Vaxelis through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program — the agency’s vaccine program for the poor — over two years ago, in March 2019.

In September of that year, the CDC followed up with an affirmative vote. Public health departments have been promoting Vaxelis to participating VFC providers since early June 2021.

At its September 2019 meeting, CDC outlined another topic deemed important for discussion in the near future — raising the issue of whether Vaxelis should be “preferentially recommended” for the American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN) pediatric population.

The tenuous rationale, according to the meeting notes, was because, “in the pre-vaccine era” (more than 35 years ago), “Hib disease occurred at a younger age among the AI/AN population compared to the general population.”

Wave of the future?

Judging from its website, the CDC perceives combination vaccines to be the wave of the future, and has signaled its strong endorsement of Vaxelis by incorporating the new vaccine into its 2021 vaccine schedule.

As if exposure to six antigens were not enough, FDA and CDC also say it is okay for healthcare providers to administer the six-in-one shot at the same time as other vaccines.

These agencies’ characterization of the Vaxelis safety profile as “acceptable” indicates they have either not done their due diligence, or are willing to accept a high level of collateral damage in exchange for the “convenience” of six-in-one shots.

However, as the “overwhelmed by guilt” parents of COVID-vaccine-injured teens are increasingly finding out, convenience is poor consolation for life-changing or life-threatening adverse outcomes.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from CHD

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

A Group of Florida Parents Cultured Their Children’s Masks and Found Dangerous Bacteria

Revealing the dangers of wearing masks.

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The idea of children, including preschoolers, walking around with bacteria traps on their breathing orifices all day so shocked the conscience that last summer, a bunch of internet parodies were produced illustrating such absurdity. Then, within weeks, most local governments mandated this cruel form of child abuse for an entire year without any study of the side effects. Now a group of parents from the Gainesville, Florida, area have shown that such masks are traps for harmful bacteria that potentially make children much sicker than from COVID — the virus for which the masks were required, but failed to mitigate.

In a press release obtained by TheBlaze and posted at RationalGround.com, six Alachua County, Florida, parents reported the findings of the lab cultures of their children’s masks worn in school. The parents sent the six masks to the University of Florida’s Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center after they were worn for five to eight hours, most during in-person schooling by children ages 6 through 11. Although many students across the country likely wore dirty masks indefinitely for numerous days, the face masks studied in this analysis were new or freshly laundered before wearing. One of the masks submitted was from an adult who wore it at work as a cosmetologist.

The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria.

The lab used a method called proteomics to extract proteins from the masks and sequence them. The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
  • Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
  • Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
  • Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, bloodstream infections, meningitis, UTIs — resistant to antibiotics)
  • Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
  • Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
  • Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
  • Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)
  • Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections — high morbidity rates)
  • Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)

 

“Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria,” according to the release. “One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.”

For a control, the parents submitted a T-shirt worn by one of the children at school and unworn masks. No pathogens were found on the controls.

Obviously, the naysayers will immediately jump on this and criticize it as being a rudimentary study and small sample size. But that is the entire point. Of course, this issue needs further study. But why has this not been done over the course of the entire year by our government or any well-funded institution? How can we mandate such draconian policies without studying the side effects, including the spread of pathogens? Why is this left to helpless parents trying to raise awareness of these concerns?

It’s not like these concerns are novel. On March 8, 2020, Dr. Fauci told “60 Minutes” that masks can only block large droplets, they give a false sense of security, and they cause people to get more germs on their hands by fiddling with them. Several weeks later, Surgeon General Jerome Adams punctuated this point about the counterproductivity of wearing masks in public. Appearing on “Fox & Friends” on March 31, Adams said that based on a study that shows medical students who wear masks touch their faces 23 times more often, one has to assume that “wearing a mask improperly can actually increase your risk of getting disease.”

A 2014 study of hospital workers wearing surgical masks in a Bangkok hospital found their masks to be saturated with Staphylococcus aureus (found on some of the masks in the Alachua study) and the fungus Aspergillus. Another study of hospital workers in China from 2019 observed that after more than six hours of use, masks worn by medical personnel also contained viruses, including adenovirus, bocavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza viruses. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to hypothesize that a warm and humid microclimate cultivated by a mask is going to serve as an incubator for all sorts of pathogens. Not surprisingly, studies have shown that pathogen density on masks grows exponentially after two hours of use.

To this day, Fauci and CDC researchers have never answered how those concerns were no longer valid after their political U-turn on masks, given the terrible conditions with which we’ve witnessed the entire country wearing and reusing masks. The same reason why Fauci said last summer they never planned to embark on a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of masks is likely why they never studied the side effects of masks either. They didn’t want to discover the truth that they themselves originally understood.

These findings are important for two reasons. First, there is a need to ensure that mask mandates are never implemented again. The Boston Globe is already advocating their use for the flu season. Second, as much as the mask mandate has ended for most consumers, workers in many professions are still required to wear them for hours on end without regard for the hazards they pose.

A Florida appeals court has already ruled that the mask mandate in Alachua County is presumptively unconstitutional because it violates bodily autonomy. The risk of masks cultivating and spreading other pathogens is just another reason why something this personal to the body must remain a personal choice.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”