Rob Skiba Predicted Mind Control Parasites “Liver Fluke” in Relation to Vaccines – “Liver Fluke” Studies Currently Being Conducted Using CRISPR Technology

“In those days, men will seek death and will not find it.”

It’s extremely eerie these days connecting several different sources that all seem to point to the same thing.

It does not bode well for humanity.

Rob Skiba, who unfortunately passed away October 13, 2021 (some sites claim October 14), has been an outspoken proponent in many subjects; and while they are considered controversial to some, there is something to be said for someone so highly shunned from mainstream media sites. As most of us are starting to realize, those who are commonly ridiculed and attacked on msm, are usually the ones speaking the most truth.

Which brings me to Mr. Skiba’s theories on what seems to be playing out RIGHT NOW. I want to focus on a ~10 minute portion of part of his presentation called, “2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal?” that he made in 2013.

Part of the portion in question starts at 1:17:30 – 1:20:09, which I will provide a transcript of.

With many doctors and researchers finding parasites in the vaccines, the following excerpt from the video is incredibly topical, especially considering ongoing studies that DARPA and other institutions are conducting with the very same subject.

Rob Skiba: “I don’t know. Makes you think. I mean, when you start looking at things like parasites, you start thinking about host manipulation.

There’s some interesting videos I’m going to show you in that regard.”

Inserted clip from natgeotv.com

Narrator: “Ants are a part of the most disciplined, dedicated, social system on Earth. Until, that is, they become slaves to behavior controlling parasites.

Suddenly, these rogue ants no longer serve the colony. They’re taking their orders from the parasite.

Okay, let’s back up. Now, how did this happen?

It all begins when the ants in any town in the U.S.A. consume the slime of a passing snail. They divide it up and take it back to the colony.

This is a blunder of epic proportions. Turns out, the slime is loaded with eggs of a body-snatcher called the “liver fluke”. A type of flatworm.

The liver fluke burrows into a part of the ant’s brain. And for unknown reasons, it’s almost like the fluke enslaves the ants and orders them to carry it to their next host. Any grazing mammal host with a nice warm liver will do. But in this case, a cow appears.

The liver fluke worms can switch the ants behavior on and off. Causing the infected ants to place themselves in easy to eat positions at dusk, when mammals are feeding. No cows in sight? Ants act normal. Cows appear, ants are, in essence, ordered to take their positions in purple flowers and latch on.

The cows ingest the vegetation, the ants, and the fluke larvae inside the ants all in one bite. Once inside the cow, the worms burrow out of the stomach and into the liver, where they develop into adults and dine on liver tissue.

They lay eggs that are excreted from the liver into the bile duct. And then defecated by the cows. They don’t kill the cows. But the cows become weak and emaciated, devastating herds.

And all because of parasitic mind control.

Rob Skiba: “Did you catch that? This microscopic parasite controls the brain of an ant that normally gets around doing its thing just fine, but as soon as a mammal walks by, they all run up to get eaten. Because that parasite wants to get into the liver of a mammal. 

All right. And there’s a much longer version of this video that I have that shows similar things happen to humans.

DARPA funds to develop drug-delivering parasites to infect people

Now, keep this in mind when reading the below excerpts from the following websites – REAL studies, REAL agendas:

“The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences researchers have been awarded a $3.6 million contract to genetically modify commensal organisms to produce antidotes for harmful biological and chemical agents, such as anthrax, Ebola, and even COVID-19.”

[ https://smhs.gwu.edu/news/gw-wins-contract-develop-antidote-bearing-organisms-protect-against-biological-chemical-threats ] “GW Wins Contract to Develop Antidote-Bearing Organisms to Protect Against Biological, Chemical Threats” (September 10, 2021)

First off, don’t let the term “commensal” fool you. As what has been seen and proven over and over again when researching these types of organizations, flat-out lying and using double-speak comes natural to these institutions to manipulate and deceive the rest of the public.

We are genetically modifying the organisms responsible for the neglected tropical disease, schistosomiasis, to instead serve as a platform for delivering antibodies to frontline personnel who risk exposure to biological pathogens or harmful chemicals”

“Our goal is to create an anti-threat solution that can be activated in 10 minutes or less and can be quickly adapted for new threats.”

“Brindley and his lab colleagues at GW have expertise in using CRISPR/Cas9 to limit the impact of schistosomiasis and liver fluke infection. Because the agents that cause these diseases are adept at entering and circulating in the human body, they represent a potentially promising delivery vehicle for carrying antibody genes into the body as well. Brindley will use CRISPR/Cas9 to plug genetic information into the DNA of male organisms. As the organisms cycle through their life, the team aims to manipulate the experimentally gene-edited segment of genetic material, or transgene, to perform programmed tasks, such as turning on and off and releasing an anti-pathogen antibody into the body.

[ https://smhs.gwu.edu/news/gw-wins-contract-develop-antidote-bearing-organisms-protect-against-biological-chemical-threats ] “GW Wins Contract to Develop Antidote-Bearing Organisms to Protect Against Biological, Chemical Threats” (September 10, 2021)

The same site was also kind enough to provide a picture of what the parasitic organism and its eggs might look like under the microscope:

"This image, taken with an inverted microscope, shows a pair of schistosomes in culture surrounded by eggs recently laid by the female." - smhs.gwu.edu

From a similar article but with additional information:

“The effort is part of DARPA’s Personalized Protective Biosystem (PPB) program, which is exploring the use of new transgenic commensal organisms—specifically hookworms and schistosomes—to secrete therapeutics specifically targeting chemical and biological threats”

“Capitalising on recent advances in genetic modification using CRISPR-Cas9, the team will create parasitic helminths that secrete drugs that counteract bioterrorism agents, and thereby protect the parasite-infected subject against chemical and biological agents in a safe and well tolerated manner.”

“We are thinking of parasitic helminths as internal molecular foundries, producing and delivering drugs within and throughout the body continuously, or on demand, if we so choose,” said Professor Loukas.”

[ https://globalbiodefense.com/2021/10/02/protective-biosystems-parasites-to-fight-chemical-and-biological-weapons/ ] “Protective Biosystems: Parasites to Fight Chemical and Biological Weapons” (September 10, 2021)

They are outrightly admitting that they want to infect you with parasites, and that these genetically modified parasites can then deliver drugs to your system and are able to be continuously dispensed, or turned on and off, “if we so choose” – claims Professor Loukas.

While these agendas are always reiterated with “positive reinforcement” that this is to fight against chemical and biological weapons or to counter other infections or the like, we have to remember that this is just a massive pretense for their real purpose. Which is obviously NOT for our benefit.

For a small list of the studies that the NIH and other institutes are engaged in dealing with the liver fluke parasite (aka “fasciola”):

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19622408/ ] “Chapter 2. Fasciola, lymnaeids and human fascioliasis, with a global overview on disease transmission, epidemiology, evolutionary genetics, molecular epidemiology and control” (2009)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24480313/ ] “Neurological and ocular fascioliasis in humans” (2014)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25602718/ ] “Distribution of Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica in the endemic area of Guilan, Iran: Relationships between zonal overlap and phenotypic traits” (2015)

[ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30878093/ ] “Protective efficacy of liver fluke DNA vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Guiding novel vaccine development” (2019)

Thomas Horn / Rob Skiba predict a fake “flu pandemic” for mass vaccination

Now, continuing on with Mr. Skiba’s lecture, in which he delves into the “mark of the beast” talk (which is a topic that one should investigate and pray about it in a sincere manner), I want to bring our attention to his other theories that ties vaccines into this mix.

Rob Skiba @1:21:34:And in those days, men shall seek death and death shall – and shall not find it, and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

Everybody talks about buying and selling. The mark of the beast. You’re not going to be able to buy and sell. Well that’s true, but what about this part? Where people are begging for death, but death flees from them?

They have essentially purchased a counterfeit immortality, apart from Christ. That is why they’re cast alive into the lake of fire. They have genetically modified themselves such that they are no longer redeemable after that and the only solution is to take them alive and put them in the lake of fire.

Everybody talks about the buying and selling, but they’re missing a big part of the component right here.”

@1:22:33: “Now, back in the 90’s – 80’s, what not, and barcodes… You know, everybody was on the barcode kick. I was too. Preaching, “That’s the mark of the beast! The barcode!” You know? Cause you got the two long skinny lines there is the 6, the barcode. You notice on the barcode has two long skinny lines on both ends and the one set in the middle.

So everybody was like, “See? 666, with an identifier in the middle, it’s the mark of the beast! The barcode!”Right? Then later everybody started talking more recent times about the microchip. Now everybody thinks it’s the microchip.

Well, it may be a combination of all of those things, but I really think it’s in here. [shows slide of a barcode, microchip and needle] And, it’s in the syringe. I think it’s – we’re dealing with something that has to do, at the genetic level, with DNA.”

@1:23:51:How could that happen? Well, Dr. Thomas Horn and others speculated on this on how this might happen. With regard to a pandemic. Again, in true Hegelian style, you know, Hegelian dialectic, is where you cause a problem, which causes a reaction, that you just so happened to have the solution for, already ready to go. Right?

So, okay. Just imagine this. They release – “they”, whoever they are – they’re responsible for everything, right? – release a really bad flu pandemic of some sort. Well imagine this. If you don’t get the shot that they’ve got all ready to go for you, no shot, or cure, means, well, you don’t have a job.

Somebody mentioned last night their job required them to take the flu shot. And if they don’t get the flu shot they lose their jobs. So we’re already seeing kind of a microcosm of that happening right now. A test.

Got to take the shot! You know. You can’t, you can’t be a teacher in school, or you can’t work at CVS or whatever. You got to take the shot.

So they’re already making it mandatory for some people. So we’ve got a little miniature test going on with that. If you don’t take it, there’s no cure, no job, you end up being quarantined.

Oh, you – you don’t have – you don’t want to take the shot? You don’t want to take, what really I believe is going to be the mark of the beast? Well fine. You’re going to have to be quarantined. Bring you over here.

Well, that means you’re not going to have any money, which means you won’t be able to buy or sell. That seems to be a good explanation to me to explain why they can’t buy or sell, but also explain why they beg for death but death flees from them. Because they can’t die.

Quest for immortality?

So yes, it just gets even more eye-opening from here.

Within the same context of “In those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.” – Revelation 9:6, there is another parasite-like organism that was allegedly found in the COVID vaccine and brought to many people’s attention by Dr. Carrie Madej.

Image by Dr. Carrie Madej / Stew Peters Show

A quote by Dr. Carrie Madej describing the hydra vulgaris – the parasite identified in the vaccine:

“it’s immortal; in a lab setting, at least. It continuously produces its own stem cells, it never stops and it can make itself innumerable times; you can chop it up into little bits, put it in a petri dish – it forms itself again, and again, and again. It can, you know, chop one of its tentacles off, it makes a new one. It’s over and over.”

Now this part is particularly creepy to me, because as I’ve been looking into Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov, found this uncanny tid-bit that hits way too close to home:

“Те которые получат такой номер уже не смогу умереть. Они станут как бессмертные. Если такой человек из-за ужасной жизни захочет совершить самоубийство, разгонится на машине и куда-то врежется, то разлетевшись на куски вместе с машиной, он как монстр в фильме ужасов соберется в кучу и оживет.”

“Those who receive such a number will not be able to die. They will become like immortals. If such a person because of a terrible life wants to commit suicide, accelerates in a car and crashes somewhere, then scattered to pieces with the car, he is like a monster in a horror movie will gather in a heap and come to life.”
*Translated to English

I don’t know about you, but I DO NOT want to live forever. Especially not in this kind of context.

Now just imagine what could happen, if a genetically modified human (which is what DARPA, the NIH, the Human Genome Project, CRISPR technology, etc., etc., etc. are aiming for) has these types of capabilities? Not only do we have the mind-controlling liver fluke worm that they’ve admitted they want to infest in human beings, but we also have the hydra vulgaris – an organism that can live forever technically – being found for some reason in the COVID vaccines and being injected into the population.

It seems to be getting more apparent that these mad-scientists/global “leaders” are experimenting on humankind in order to genetically modify the perfect mind-controlled slave that will live forever obeying orders. And in combination with “microchips” and/or nanobots, have an operating system that the same organizations have also admitted to wanting to initiate into every human being on the planet. It would also be handy in a “digitized world” – Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset dream – to turn OFF a specific host who is not obeying their “new world order” agenda.

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by PixxlTeufel from Pixabay

Genesis 14: Abram Rescues Lot

Earnest Examination

This series is presented as an honest, sincere look into the study of the Bible with my own personal theories, opinions, comments and that of others’ insights and research into what the verses could mean. I cannot claim one way or another that everything that I am stating is fact and the true meaning of what is meant in these verses.

To lay it out in a way that I can manage, I have highlighted the texts of verses that I either don’t understand or have a comment or question about in yellow. And the comments I’ve left beneath it will be of a smaller font and using brown text.

I would love it if you’d join me in this journey and if you have any insights and/or knowledge of these chapters/verses etc., please feel free to share with me and the other readers. Any chance to get a clearer understanding of the Bible and Jesus Christ would be welcomed with open arms.

Version used is from (KJV) Genesis 14

Abram Rescues Lot

1 And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations;
It’s interesting, what a little peek into a different translation of the Bible can reveal. For instance, I did not know that when this verse states “nations”, it is also meant to mean “goiim”, or “goyim” – as can be seen in the NIV, for example. I am slowly but steadily growing more informed about this term, thanks to some readings into Jewish customs and beliefs, and that history has espoused some interesting (if not, conflicting) view points of this culture. There is so much debate and disagreements about what Judaism entails, and I cannot form a strong opinion on it one way or another because I have not studied it extensively enough.
But what I CAN say, is that it is most definitely WORTH studying, to get a clearer understanding of not only another religion’s belief structure, but also since it seems to be a key component to some of the Bible’s mysteries.
I will leave my opinion at that, and hope that if anyone reads this, that it may compel you to do the same.

2 That these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar.
So if I’m understanding this correctly, the tribes and “nations” mentioned in verse 1 engaged in war with these kings – yet there is no context about what brought about this conflict. WHY did the “nations” initiate war onto these cities?
3 All these were joined together in the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea.
4 Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled.
Coming down to this verse, perhaps the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, and Admah, Zeboiim, Zoar – were all subjugated by the kings of Shinar, Ellasar, Elam, and the Tidal nations. It doesn’t quite specify what the conditions were under their rule, but the obvious implications is that the ruled over cities had enough and rebelled, which seemed to have initiated the war.
5 And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaims in Ashteroth Karnaim, and the Zuzims in Ham, and the Emims in Shaveh Kiriathaim,
And again, there is no context about the severity of the rebellion either. What exactly did these rebelling tribes do to spur this attack?
6 And the Horites in their mount Seir, unto Elparan, which is by the wilderness.
7 And they returned, and came to Enmishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites, that dwelt in Hazezontamar.
8 And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar;) and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim;
9 With Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and with Tidal king of nations, and Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar; four kings with five.
10 And the vale of Siddim was full of slimepits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and fell there; and they that remained fled to the mountain.
11 And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their victuals, and went their way.

Wow… am I the only one completely lost with all of this pronoun confusion that I see? I have read these verses at least 20 times trying to make sense on who is referred to as “they” in each context. Verse 7 is most undoubtedly indicating that “they” is referring to the king of Chedorlaomer (and his compatriots), but beyond that… I am having a hard time connecting who’s who.
From verse 10 to verse 11, the “they” pronoun seems to have switched ownership. Verse 10 implicates those who lost from the battle – but then verse 11 switches the meaning of “they”, I’m assuming…, to being the victors of the war. It is extremely unclear to me and leaves room for interpretation.
Of course, taking a look into other translations can provide further insight and clarification, but then there’s the question of whether they were misinterpreted or incorrectly transcribed.

12 And they took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.
And here, by “they”, it’s most likely meant to mean the victor as well. It’s, again, unclear as to the motive of taking Lot, but perhaps this was done in an attempt to either expand upon their own city, and/or use Lot and the other citizens of Sodom as slaves/workers. There is no clear reason and it can only be implied or assumed in these contexts. The goods are an obvious motive, in order to enrich their own community or kingdom.
13 And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram.
14 And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan.
This verse does indicate that the taking of the peoples from Sodom were to hold them captive. Again, just as a conquest of war? Or deeper motives? And there is no time frame during this conflict that could tell us how long this struggle ensued for. Days? Months? Years? Would researching/studying other texts such as the Torah/Talmud, Quran, etc. shed further light onto the information of the Bible? Is the Bible only presenting one side of the story while an engaged look into other doctrines could reveal some hidden truths?
15 And he divided himself against them, he and his servants, by night, and smote them, and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus.
16 And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people.

So it seems as though Abram and his army were still able to win victory over the men who captured Lot and the others, and their goods, and safely return them back home. And while the below verse indicates that they “slaughtered” Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with him, it makes no mention of who took over their kingdoms after their death.

17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him, at the valley of Shaveh, which is the king’s dale.
18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God.
Hm… this small verse brings up some controversial topics that send some alarm bells ringing when I read it… Again, perhaps I’m overthinking things, but just within this one passage, I can see references to the transubstantiation, ritualistic practices, sacrificial rites… the debate on whether the God of Abraham is the one True God…
I’m sure that’s probably blasphemy to a lot of people, but I am not the only person to have proposed such a theory. In fact, if one can read the Bible without a blind faith and predisposed conditions on what the verses mean, one could look outside of this paradigm and come to some other interesting premises. I won’t go into too much detail, but they are highly controversial in nature and these suppositions are not to offend or criticize anyone, but just to give a glimpse into some other hypothetical queries that are, in my opinion, worth looking into.

Now, besides the allusion into the stark contrast of the God of Abraham and the One True God, who very well may be the one in the same, there is also the theory that Melchizedek is Jesus Christ, perhaps in a former incarnation. This theory derives from the verses in Hebrews 7:1-3, which states:

“For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, 2 to whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all, first being translated “king of righteousness,” and then also king of Salem, meaning “king of peace,” 3 without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remains a priest continually.”

“King of peace” is also referred to as Jesus Christ. And Jesus Christ, although being born of Mary, was not conceived by her or by man, but allegedly by the Holy Spirit. The phrase “like the Son of God” – again, alluding to Jesus Christ, but with one key difference. Jesus Christ IS known as the Son of God. Not like the Son of God. Furthermore, if we’re going to get technical here, which I am, because it’s my effort to seek Jesus Christ and seek the Truth, I can see the obvious contrast compared to Melchizedek, and Jesus Christ.

For instance, whereas Melchizedek is congratulating and blessing Abram and his team of men for retaliating and defeating – no, not just defeating, slaughtering their enemies, Jesus Christ’s teachings, on the other hand, encourages one to love their enemies and turn their cheek against violence. …Admittedly, not sound advice when confronted with warring nations, but perhaps that’s because we as humans have a limited perception on what’s really important in life.
19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth:
20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.

Again, there is the questionable addressing of the pronouns here. The verses start out as Melchizedek blessing Abram and his crew for taking down the enemy and recovering the goods and rescuing their people. Then it segues into “And he gave him tithes of all.” This, to me, would imply that Melchizedek, upon blessing Abram, gave Abram the offering. But this is not the case. Instead, it is Abram who gives the offering – presumably from the spoils of the war, to Melchizedek. And herein lies another huge contrast between Melchizedek and Jesus Christ. Jesus wanted nothing to do with riches, material gain, etc. Instead, he preached to give one’s possessions away and to follow Him. And the True blessing to be received in Heaven into the Kingdom of God. So why was the focus here with Abram upon material possessions, lands, cattle, etc.?
21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself.
22 And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lift up mine hand unto the LORD, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth,
23 That I will not take from a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich:

Here are more references to material gain and riches. Goods, wealth, …stuff. There is an interesting lack of “spirituality” about this whole chapter. Now, while the efforts to save one’s own nation is undoubtedly important, the question soon boils down to, what necessitated it to begin with? What initially led to the rebellion of the five nations against the four kingdoms to begin with? Were they under an oppressive rule? What caused the breakaway and revolution? Living alongside/with other factions, etc. for 12 years, to then create a rebellion in the 13th year, followed by a full-blown attack in the 14th year… It does say that the five kingdoms served Chedorlaomer so perhaps it was a slavery of sorts. Of course, it seems as if Chedorlaomer is only mentioned in this chapter of the Bible, with no other references, so this would be based on supposition of the terminology used alone. Anything else surmised would be based on conjecture.
24 Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.

I know sometimes it would seem as if I’m questioning the veracity of the Bible’s origins, and while that may be true in some sense, it is not meant to presume, condemn, or ridicule, and certainly not meant to certify the propositions I set forth. It is only to get a clearer understanding of the meanings of the Bible, and the possibility that during so many transitions and translation efforts, and perhaps intentional/unintentional mishandling and misinterpretations, that the Truth along the way may have been concealed more than we’d like.

And as usual, I want to reiterate that some of my thoughts and theories may be way off base, and I also research some other things on the side as well to try and get a broader understanding of what I’m reading, so please bear with me, or, even better, if you have insights that bring more light to these verses, please let me know.

I enjoy bouncing off theories and theology off of each other and love to hear other people’s perspectives on things. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gnattyone from Pixabay