Tal Zaks, Former Chief Scientist at Moderna, Speaks of Nanomedicine, Personalized Vaccines and Genetic Engineering in 2017

Scientist quote/unquote: “hacking the software of life.”

Tal Zaks, former Chief Medical Officer at Moderna (currently partnering with Orbimed) – gives us another look at their terminology of “hacking the software of life”, i.e. – changing/modifying our genes.

Piggybacking off of Klaus Schwab’s statements that gene-editing changes YOU, not to mention Craig Venter’s (of the Human Genome Project) admission that:

“It’s pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in the cell, and the cell instantly starts reading that new software, starts making a whole different set of proteins. And within a short while, all the characteristics of the first species disappear. And a new species emerges from this software that controls that cell going forward.”

Craig Venter of the NIH and Human Genome: Creating Synthetic Life | ” – trying to design what we want biology to do”

– it is clear that, by definition, “rewriting the genetic code” changes what it means to be human – or changes whatever species is being modified. Craig Venter himself says that a “new species emerges from this software”.

So while these doctors and scientists try to sugarcoat these ill-conceived endeavors (even if they were born of good intentions initially… “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”), the attempts at genetically changing our DNA have grave consequences; not only on the physical-molecular level, but on the conscious-soul level as well.

Here, Tal Zaks, in a Tedx Talk from November 2017, specifically mentions vaccines (a total of 17 times in a 10 minute presentation) to administer this genetic-changing software. In addition, he also alludes to collecting DNA in order to make “personalized vaccines”. An endeavor that DARPA is also invested in:

DNA Script Partners with Moderna to Develop On-Demand Vaccines and Therapeutics for DARPA

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., and PARIS | April 27, 2021

[ https://www.dnascript.com/press-releases/dna-script-partners-with-moderna-to-develop-on-demand-vaccines-and-therapeutics-for-darpa/ ]

“Rewriting the Genetic Code” – Tal Zaks (2017)

Source: odysee | @RedPillman | Rewriting the Genetic Code

Full transcript below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Tal Zaks: “So I started my professional life about thirty years ago as a nurse and the pediatric intensive care unit.

And I remember this one infant, let’s call him Jonathan, who came in really really ill. Seemed to have a rare genetic defect, but in those days, gene diagnosis was still in its infancy so we couldn’t really figure out what’s wrong with him.

And in the years since, as I’ve trained as a physician scientist, we’ve been living in this phenomenal digital and scientific revolution. And I’m here today to tell you that we’re actually hacking the software of life. And that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.

So here’s all the biology you need to know in 30 seconds. Our body is made out of organs, our organs are made out of cells, and in every cell there’s this thing called “messenger RNA” or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA, our genes, to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made of.

This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do. And so we think of it like an operating system. And it’s not just in every cell of our body. It’s actually in every cell of every organism of life. It’s the same thing.

And so, if you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything from the flu, to cancer. And I’m going to demonstrate that with three short examples.

Let’s start with the flu. So many of us get a vaccine. What is a vaccine? It is an injection in our arm where we get bits and pieces of the virus; the protein, and that teaches our immune system to recognize the virus and so when we get infected we’re not sick.

Now imagine if instead of giving the protein, we would give the instructions on how to make the protein. How the body can make its own vaccine. That’s an mRNA vaccine.

And here’s what it looks like from the cell.”

Image Source: Tal Zaks / Tedx Talks

“So the traditional approach has protein floating around your cells. An mRNA vaccine approach has the cells themselves in your own body making the vaccine.

What’s more alarming: a stranger prowling the neighborhood, or somebody who’s just broke into your ground-floor, and tripped the alarm?

That’s what happens with an mRNA vaccine. You’re tripped the alarm wire and now the cell is dialing 9-1-1. It’s calling the police at the same time as it’s making the protein and saying, ‘that’s the bad guy’.

That’s how an mRNA works. And for the last several years we’ve shown this actually works in a whole multitude of animal models. Earlier this year we published the first actual study in people. And it actually works in people.

We took a group of volunteers and injected them with a messenger RNA vaccine against a variant of flu/influenza. And all of these volunteers got the immune response we were hoping to see. The side-effect profile was pretty benign, what you would see with any normal type vaccine.

So we’ve proven the principle, this actually can work. It works in people and now we’re going to be developing a whole slew of vaccines against diseases for which we don’t have one. So that’s infectious disease.

Now for the second example, let’s talk for a minute about cancer. Horrible disease. Cancer has affected the lives of many of us and will affect the lives of many more of us as we age.

The problem with cancer at the cellular level is that the DNA is screwed up. You’ve got these mutation on this screwed up DNA, leads up to screwed up information that makes screwed up protein. And so the cell loses control.

Now, how do you figure out what is actually screwed up? Well, you got to figure out the whole sequence, right?

It took us decades and billions of dollars to sequence the human genome, and we’ve done that. We achieved that in 2003. And now we’re less than 15 years later, and it takes us a week. And we can do it for every patient. So now we can go and figure out what exactly is screwed up in a patient, and we can use that information to make a vaccine.

We take that information, say a patient with lung cancer, and we take it – we take the biopsy, we figure out the sequence, we figure out their immune system, we – and that all becomes information. It goes up in the cloud into a bioinformatic algorithm and then automatically makes a vaccine that we administer into their normal tissue; into the muscle to try and wake up their immune system.

Now the challenge, of course, is that every person’s cancer is different. Mutation happened by random chance. And so to do this you have to make it personalized.

So this is me, but if every patient is different, what we’re going to have to do is make a personalized cancer vaccine for every patient. And that’s exactly what we’ve started to do. Every patient gets a vaccine that’s based on the sequence and their own tumor.

So when we started to do this a couple years ago, my CEO stopped by one evening and said, “Tal, I get the idea but is this going to work?” And I said, “Look, Stefan. I don’t know, but we’ve got all the pieces to try and answer the question so we should try.”

And today I can tell you that I still don’t know if it’s going to work. But I know we’re able to actually run the experiment. Earlier this week the first patient was treated with a personalized cancer vaccine we made just for her.

So in the months and years to come we will know the answer of whether we can actually wake the immune system against somebody’s cancer with a personalized cancer vaccine so stay tuned.

I’m gonna finish with a third example of something called “methylmalonic acidemia” or MMA for short. Now the name doesn’t matter. Okay? This is just a disease that is caused by an enzyme that’s critical for metabolism. And children are born and they lack this one crucial gene. And so their body is not able really to fight infection properly or anytime they have any sort of stress, their body goes into crisis. They have one gene that’s gone awry and it causes a really significant disease.

If you look at what happens over time, for these children, about 1/3 of them don’t make it to the age of 10. You see here the survival curve whether the gene is completely lost or whether there’s just an aberration in it, the survival is impaired.

And, what do we do? Well there’s not much you can do because the missing protein is actually missing inside their cells. So what do we do? Well, here’s what we do. We take out their liver and we transplant the liver from a donor that is healthy and normal into these kids.

Think about it. They’re missing one critical piece of information and what we do is transplant an entire organ. Well, it fixes the problem, but what if there’s a better way? What if we could fix the missing information?

So based on innovations, nanomedicine, a new class of invention that Bob Langer across the river at MIT in Cambridge has been inventing, we’re now able to package this information and messenger RNA with a goal of giving it as an infusion, and then having it go to the liver to replace that missing information.

Is this going to work? Well we know the biology works. So together with the National Institutes of Health, we’ve studied this in a mouse model and this mouse has been engineered to have the exact same problem that the kids have. They’re lacking the one – the same gene. And you can see in the red line what happens to these mice when they’re born. Pretty much immediately they die. They cannot cope with stress. But if you inject messenger RNA that codes for the one missing protein that replaces that information, these mice, all of them survive, as you can see in the green line. And if you look at them they not only survive, they’re actually growing, they’re gaining weight, they look like they’re healthy littermates.

We’re hoping to start the clinical trial in the near future and the idea is the same thing here. If you think about what it is we’re trying to do, we’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs and we’re fusing the two. We think of it as information therapy.

I started by telling you about Jonathan and 30 years ago, and I was a nurse in the intensive care unit, I worked two night shifts, and Jonathan came in when he was about 12 months old and very quickly became dependent on a ventilator. And for the next 15 months or so, every time I came into the unit he was my patient to care for. You know, bathe, feed, treat, play with – he couldn’t talk, he was on a ventilator, but he was very much alive and you could tell – you could play with him, his eyes would – would follow me. After a while he would recognize me. Until one day I came into the unit for my shift and he was no longer there. He had died because of an infection in between shifts.

Imagine a world where we cannot just diagnose, but we can actually use the information to create vaccines to wake up the immune system to something like cancer and to fix the missing information for children with diseases like Jonathan, so that they can leave the ICU and live a healthy life.

Thank you.”

What is “nanomedicine”?

“Nanomedicine is defined as the medical application of nanotechnology. Nanomedicine can include a wide range of applications, including biosensors, tissue engineering, diagnostic devices, and many others. In the Center for Nanomedicine at Johns Hopkins, we focus on harnessing nanotechnology to more effectively diagnose, treat, and prevent various diseases.”

[ https://cnm-hopkins.org/what-is-nanomedicine/ ]

Interestingly, but not surprisingly, Johns Hopkins was the organization that the WEF (World Economic Forum / Klaus Schwab – famous for the “Great Reset” agenda) chose to moderate the EVENT 201 Plandemic Pandemic exercise, with the help of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation…

And while, of course, Mr. Zaks ends his speech high-lighting the beneficial aspects of a “gene-editing vaccine” and reminds the audience that it is to “cure cancer” or any other number of diseases, we must be alert to alternative motives and the implications of what could arise from such technological tampering of the human genome, not to mention a collection of the population’s DNA in a database – to control and alter at their discretion.

Now aside from those chilling prospects, is it worth it to forever alter a human being, and what it means to be human, by injecting them with genetic changing software? What possibilities might arise from such an endeavor? Are we SURE that they have our best interest in mind? (that is a rhetorical question, by the way… because of course they don’t) If they can change us as a species, then it follows suit that it can change our emotions, our thoughts, even our very purpose.

There are some things in life which should not be meddled with. “Life” itself, is definitely one of them.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Youtube Trigger Words

Can you guess what words trigger youtube’s algorithm software?

UPDATED to clarify a misunderstanding in the youtube demonitized word list.

Some people may know of Youtube’s strange algorithm that will “demonetize” videos if they have certain keywords in the title. At least, according to this site and this list. And to say that some of these words are extremely innocuous is an understatement.

Then there is the case of the automatic bots, AI, and reporting system that targets certain content and certain narratives. So many previous youtube users have been canceled, banned, demonetized for not falling in line and supporting a certain view. This is also indicative of youtube’s policy, which basically states that it is allowed to ban/delete/censor/demonetize any video if it “breaks any of their rules”, of course under their definition. So something like “hate speech” could simply be someone stating, “I can’t stand dogs. Cats are way better.” or, “Down with math! I hate math! Math is racist!” …

There is another theory that even though youtube is able to demonetize any video they wish, they are still able to get viewers and content creators with all of these demonetized videos while not having to pay them for ads – saving this, instead, for their “cream of the crop”.

Creators finally know how much money YouTube makes, and they want more of it
The YouTube demonetization controversy, explained

Now, another interesting thing that I came across, are OTHER certain key words that trigger youtube’s algorithm in a different way.

Perhaps you’ve seen a screen like this on youtube while watching a certain video:

At the bottom of the video there is an “information panel” to present additional information to the viewer for that specific topic. Regardless of the opinions contained within that video. So these “information panels” are basically to guide the viewer to the “actual facts” of that subject matter.

In the above example, we can see that it is a COVID-19 related information panel, because tptsb want to enforce their idea onto the public about what covid is, how severe it is, and how we all MUST take the vaccine in order to go back to normal. …Clicking on that specific LEARN MORE link will take you to the cdc website.

Now besides their use of the information bar for specific news sources, like they use for BBC, PBS, etc., this specific information bar for covid is meant to combat “misinformation” on topical subjects.

Source: Youtube/Google support page | Information panel giving topical context

Huh. They must have read my mind. Because the “moon landing” is exactly what I was looking up when noticing this very helpful “information” bar. Sure, I’ve seen it before, but it never really caught my attention until just recently.

While researching interesting information about NASA (there’ll be a post about them coming up soon), I noticed that the youtube video I was watching mentioned “flat Earth” and the dome/firmament allegedly around us that would prevent NASA from actually going into outer space and showing us all these lovely videos and photographs of the Earth from a distance, etc., etc., and the alleged Mars rover landings. This topic is a whole different subject altogether, which I won’t get into here, but thought it was interesting that the youtube algorithm would specifically give an information bar about “flat Earth”.

“YouTube had faced criticism for allowing the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories through its platform. In 2019, YouTube stated that it was making changes in its software to reduce the distribution of videos based on conspiracy theories including flat Earth.” – Wikipedia | Flat Earth

If you notice, the video does not mention “flat earth” in the title, but it is a subject discussed in the video. Now, why would an affiliate of youtube (if it’s not youtube themselves) go through the time and effort to specifically put this additional information bar trying to lead the viewers to a third-party website to “combat misinformation”, if youtube is supposedly a platform highlighting the following (found on their own About page) –

For the harder to read texts:

Freedom of Expression: “We believe people should be able to speak freely, share opinions, foster open dialogue, and that creative freedom leads to new voices, formats and possibilities.

Freedom of Information: “We believe everyone should have easy, open access to information and that video is a powerful force for education, building understanding, and documenting world events, big and small.

Freedom of Opportunity: “We believe everyone should have a chance to be discovered, build a business and succeed on their own terms, and that people—not gatekeepers—decide what’s popular.

Freedom to Belong: “We believe everyone should be able to find communities of support, break down barriers, transcend borders and come together around shared interests and passions.

Either they are lying through their teeth about their own beliefs and values, or they have no idea what “freedom” means. …Or I guess it could be both.

Some people will try to defend youtube’s rights to deplatform or demonetize anyone they wish, but you can’t tell me that their “views” aligns with what they are actually doing.

And why are these “critics” so afraid of people believing in flat earth to begin with? If it’s such a RIDICULOUS claim and all of these people are dolts for entertaining the idea, what’s the harm if they believe in a nonsense conspiracy theory? If the world is really a globe then just chalk it up to a whole bunch of people being foolishly misled and move on. …Unless, of course, too many people are believing it and it’s harming the very fabric of a billion-dollar enterprise that uses the tax-payers money to engage in fraudulent mass manipulation and deception. Just food for thought.

Getting to the other trigger words I’ve found that will bring up a similar information bar, along with “flat Earth” and “covid“, there are also these:

– flat earth
– covid-19
– illuminati
– qanon
– freemasonry
– U.S. elections
– assassination of John F. Kennedy
– Apollo space program
– climate change
– contrail (chemtrail)
– reptilian humanoid
– Bohemian Club
– vaccine hesitancy

Now why would these very few and very specific words trigger an “information” bar?

I’ve tried a long list (being of a conspiratorial or controversial nature) of what I thought would trigger an information bar, but the above were the only ones I’ve seen so far. I’ve tried:

– vaccine
– Fauci
– Bill Gates
– Epstein
– royal family
– pope
– vatican
– satan
– hydroxychloroquine
– lgbqt
– gender
– abortion

– pizzagate
– wikileaks
– government
– cia
– moon landing
– Roswell
– ufo
– alien
– nasa
– bible
– God
– Jesus

– Jew
– semite
– darpa
– cern
– LHC
– Haarp
– mrna
– 9/11
– September 11
– Hitler
– Saddam Hussein
– capitol riot

(Now I’m probably on a list for making this list…)

I’ve searched many more terms, but these are just ones I’ve decided to highlight to show the diversity of the topics that I looked up. None of these triggered the information bar. So it’s very interesting that the few words above did.

While youtube back in its glory days was more of a fair, user-friendly platform that tried to treat everyone equally, that is no longer the case. Now, the company is nothing more than a propaganda driven love-fest with the efforts being spent on highlighting biased, partisan views (their own views or that of their top monetary donors…) instead of an outlet where people are allowed to say their own opinions (and facts! in some cases) – within reason, of course. Yes, hate speech is still something that is hard to tackle, but when one can literally call anything and everything “hate speech”, the lines become severely blurred and prevents anyone from saying anything due to unfair criticism and judgement.

Debate is no longer an option. Now it is, “Do as I say, and think as I do, or you’re a terrorist. White supremacist. Conspiracy theorist. Engaging in hate speech. Fake news. Misinformation. Dangerous far-right dissenter. We must de-platform, ban, censor, delete, dox – anything we can do to get you in line or shut you out.”

This is what we’re faced with. Why are people getting attacked for their different belief structures? Is it because it dares to fly in the face of a corrupt organization(s) that is trying to implement their absolute tyranny over the whole planet? Does it threaten their ideologies and/or the wool that they’ve put over the public’s eyes? Why are certain “theories” being so harshly condemned and persecuted?

And strange theories, they are. Could these possibly have an ounce (or a ton) of truth to them? And this is why these immoral establishments are trying so hard to reign the control back in? Are people waking up to the possibility that we’re all being massively lied to on a grand scale? (And could it also be a diversionary tactic to keep our attention away from something completely different?)

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Steve Buissinne from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”