Technology to Turn Human Remains Into Diamonds – Simply to Cherish One’s Memories? | The Pentagon May Know the Answer

Diamond in the rough? There may be more truth to this than we realize…

It’s amazing how far we’ve come technology wise. We’ve come so far, in fact, that the implications of where we are heading holds incredibly drastic and questionable ethical concerns that have apparently been swept aside in the name of scientific pursuit.

Take the subject of today’s topic, for instance.

Creating diamonds out of human remains.

Sounds incredible, right?

In a “novel idea”, companies like LifeGem have introduced a new way to have your loved one memorialized. By using people’s carbon/ashes after they’re cremated – these companies are able to craft a diamond from a human being’s remains in a manner of days, weeks, months… depending on how large the diamond is requested to be.

However, some gemologists are opposed to this idea – no doubt because of the threat of synthetic diamonds honing in on their own business, but Robert James, a gemologist at the Insurance Institute of Jewelry Appraisal (at least at the time that the article in question came out), has this interesting report to make:

“In a report pitting claims made by Eterneva against independent scientific research, James concludes that while living human bones do contain carbon due to the living tissue, “during the cremation process, all of this carbon is either lost to the furnace fire or turned into gas that escapes through the cremation furnace vents.” 

“Simply stated,” he continues, “there is no carbon left in cremation ashes unless the body is only partially cremated, something no cremation company will do.”

The Lucrative ‘Cremation Diamonds’ Business Is All Hot Air

While I appreciate Robert James conclusion that a complete cremation would destroy any carbon left, I do question his assertion that no cremation company would only partially cremate a body. The appeal of financial compensation would, I’m sure, create some allies in the cremation business. Not to mention what a highly thought-out and impressive presentation might influence certain organizations to take part in.

With that being said, there are others who claim that there can be a way to extract carbon from hair as long as the hair is cut before the body is cremated. However, that still leaves room to doubt when a person has insufficient amount of hair to make the diamond in demand.

However, all of this is a moot point, because the topic isn’t so much that a body can be transmuted, if you will, into a diamond – but that it is, and what the concerning repercussions of that may be – and that may, in fact, hold far more sinister implications that humanity may never have realized.

 

Oh… you thought this article was just going to address the questionable ethical aspect of turning a loved one’s remains into a diamond?

No, not at all.

As anyone who has spent some time on my site may have deduced, I gather information from a wide variety of topics and present it here, for the readers to consider. Yes, the topics vary and sometimes cross the edge into conspiratorial natures, but seeing as how the subject at hand involves alchemical processes – and there are many who believe in this (turning water into wine, transubstantiation of the Eucharist, turning bodies into diamonds…) then there is no reason to not cross the barrier into other mysterious phenomena.

Lessons learned

Take the case of the Russian prophet, Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov, for example. I have covered this young prophet before and referenced him a few times thereafter, but this specific topic is particularly intriguing to me, because when I first heard about people being turned into diamonds, from the prophecies of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov, no less, I didn’t believe it.

In fact, I thought it was absolutely preposterous.

Turning people into diamonds? Pfft, yeah right.

However, in the absolute case of slapping me upside the head for my ignorance, a synchronous event led me to finding out that this is, indeed, an actual happenstance. I did not search out this information for myself, unfortunately. I thought it was too unbelievable to actually be real.

No, instead, I found this out while researching a different topic altogether. So imagine my surprise when I came across this article, Dead people and pets are being forged into sparkling blue diamonds — here’s how, while on a trail researching carbon, boron, graphite/graphene and the immune system. I was not expecting this to come up.

Imagine the humbling attitude it took for me to realize that as much as I write about (and believe in) many of these fantastic accounts, that I am still capable of disbelief and skepticism.

In fact, the “people into diamonds” business has been in effect since at least 2000 – so who knows how long this idea was even put into motion?

Well… another reason I didn’t believe (didn’t want to believe?) that turning people into diamonds was a real endeavor, was the main purpose that Vyacheslav said it was for. Again, it sounds incredulous, but as I’ve learned, I’m not going to just dismiss it out of hand because it sounds far-fetched and I don’t want to believe it’s true.

WHY are humans being turned into diamonds?
(It may not be as innocuous as simply honoring their memory…)

Returning back to Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov’s prophecies, told through his mother since he passed away in 1993 (in which, I have already considered the possibility, like others have surmised, that the mother may be embellishing her son’s teachings/words, for whatever reason; however, after some study and consideration, have found this unlikely and not my current held stance), is this interesting tidbit about what these diamonds are used for…

@1:48:30: “Slavochka said that UFOs will be flying all over the world. He said that they are half(semi)-material objects. The fuel for this half-material object is diamonds. The larger the diamond the longer it lasts.

He even said that they have a big round button; he called it a button. If you remove this button, you’ll see a hole underneath. They insert a diamond there and it lasts them a long time. The larger the diamond is, the longer its use. In general, the fuel for these half-material objects is diamonds.

The world government supplies them with diamonds. The dedicated people deliver them these diamonds.”

A few minutes later, this is divulged:

@1:56:20: “Slava said that the world government has direct connections with “aliens” and that with their permission people are being dragged to these crafts where they are subjected to different experiments. 

That it is possible to make a diamond out of a human. If the experiment is successful and they manage to press a person along with his soul somehow, then they get a very good diamond which gives them a nearly unlimited source of energy. Then demons are able to fly in their UFOs using human souls.

Of course, it sounds unbelievable, but he said that the Earth government allows “aliens”, that don’t exist – they are demons – to conduct various experiments on humans.

Eventually, they themselves will fear them a lot. World government is afraid of the “aliens”. But it uses all of their technologies. These technologies are terrible since they allow making a diamond out of a human being and then fly on it in UFOs.

Diamonds are fuel provided to them by the world government. The larger the diamond, the longer is the flight. Slava just said, “The larger the diamond, the longer it lasts.”

(For transparency reasons, there is a “copypasta” that has made its rounds on the internet that also delves into this topic (along with other content) perhaps as a way to try and delegitimize the details surrounding this information. I cannot claim one way or another if this was done in a sincere attempt to try and get the information out, or if it was widely spread to promote the idea of nonsensical “conspiracy theories” as a means of invalidating its veracity.)

It sounds unbelievably insane; I get that. So much so, that initially this was the one piece of information that I could not wrap my head around when I first heard this mentioned.

Chilling revelations

Yet, when researching what even those at the top levels of the Pentagon have alleged, at least, according to Luis Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon’s AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) from 2010 to 2017, he had this to say:

“In fact, Elizondo claimed one senior official “told him to ‘Stop’ ” investigating UFOs — and asked Elizondo if he had “read your Bible lately?”

Elizondo asked where his boss was going with the non sequitur before acknowledging familiarity with the Good Book. As per Elizondo, he was then told, “Well, then you would know that these things are demonic and we should not be pursuing them.’ “

UFOs are real, Feds’ cover-up fueled by fear: ex-Pentagon whistleblower

In the same article, are additional references of those in high positions alleging claims that UFOs/extraterrestrials are demonic in nature:

“Dr. Eric Davis, Ph.D., a former rocket scientist for the Air Force Research Laboratory and currently a scientist at government contractor the Aerospace Corporation, confirmed: “They objected to UFOs as being Satanic!”

“Nick Pope (former head of the UFO office in the UK’s Ministry of Defence) saw similar incidents of religion trumping science in the UK. “Some objections come from people in government who think the phenomenon is real — but demonic,” Pope said. “Their belief seems to be that studying UFOs would thus give energy to attention-seeking demons, which should be avoided. This view comes, in part, from the biblical description of Satan as ‘the prince of the power of the air.’ “

UFOs are real, Feds’ cover-up fueled by fear: ex-Pentagon whistleblower

Interesting how even government officials are describing UFOs as being satanic and their biblical references to Satan being the “prince of the power of the air”.

And with that, I’d like to defer your attention back to another one of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov’s accounts:

@1:45:35: “He said that planes and helicopters will be crashing and falling to the ground very often. It will take a long time for people to figure out why. But finally they will understand why.

When a UFO will stand right in front of the aircraft preventing it from taking off and use different ways to thwart people, then they will realize that it’s undesirable to occupy airspace because UFOs are preparing for the war with God. Slavochka said, “They are preparing for the war with God.” Therefore, they need the airspace to maneuver, and if an aircraft appears to be on their way they crash it.”

Russian Angel Youth Vyacheslav Film 2 part 2 – 360p

Hm… take it for what it’s worth, and as crazy as it might sound, I am inclined to believe Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov’s words over the incredibly corrupt medical/scientific organizations who have perpetuated multiple heinous lies in order to get everyone on the planet vaccinated with a gene-altering “therapy” drug.

Keep in mind, even those at the Pentagon/DoD levels have suspected UFOs/extraterrestrials as being demonic in nature. And as Vyacheslav has stated, those of governmental authority will also end up fearing these beings.

We could go even further back: in 1991, Reverend Dr. Ray Boeche had a clandestine meeting with a couple of officials at the Department of Defense, where he and the Pentagon/DoD came to the realization that they were dealing with decidedly diabolical forces:

“Although the DoD had initially assumed the entities they were dealing with were extraterrestrial, Boeche was informed that over time that view changed significantly and dramatically. Indeed, the scientists on board eventually came to believe that they were not dealing with aliens from far away galaxies, after all, but with highly dangerous, deceptive, manipulative demons – as in literal demons from a literal Hell.

The UFO presence on our planet, the Pentagon group believed, was designed to seduce us into believing aliens were amongst us, when the reality – as they saw it, at least – was that we were being led to accept that belief as a means to allow Satan’s minions to get his claws into us.”

“As incredible as it might sound, those attached to the Pentagon program consulted numerous early texts and books that addressed the field of demonology, chiefly to try and figure out the extent to which the UFO phenomenon – some of it or, perhaps, even all of it – was the result of demonic activity and attendant satanic deception. A great deal of time was spent studying numerous books on ancient and modern demonology, including John Deacon and John Walker’s 1601 work, Dialogical Discourses of Spirits and Devils and R. Campbell Thompson’s The Devils and Evil Spirits of Babylonia.

The Deacon and Walker book presented to its readers a long and complicated history of demonology, the means by which demons could get their grips into easily manipulated people, and the deceptive nature of these unholy creatures – all of which was worryingly familiar to the Department of Defense team.”

Demons and the Defense Department

As for the original topic of this discussion, turning people into diamonds, how can one be sure of the actual motives of these “LifeGem” (and the several others like it) companies?

In 2002 [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2dWnDzx83g ] “LifeGem introduces a diamond created from ashes on the NBC Today Show in 2002”, @2:12 the alleged founder of LifeGem, Greg Herro, claims that they can make at least 50 diamonds from one person’s body. Of course, these 50 would undoubtedly be of the same size/weight to fit into a ring or necklace. But what if these companies create the one gem (or amount of gems) for the innocent loved one who asked for it, yet used the rest of the cremains to create a larger diamond for a separate purpose?

It would make sense that they wouldn’t want to waste the rest of the material and instead could use the rest to craft a much larger diamond at the behest of, say, an influential and powerful organization…

And that’s assuming that these companies aren’t just sending a completely synthesized diamond made out of the usual material to their customers, and using the complete cremains for their own motive.

This is, of course, speculation, and I have no idea how these companies actually synthesize the diamonds or use the remains/ashes of a human body. Or even if the procedure of these ashes-to-diamonds companies are the same as what Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov mentioned. Perhaps they are two entirely different procedures altogether. However, the implications in this post should be worth a serious consideration.

Are we willing to transmute a loved ones body (or ourself, for that matter) to presumably encapsulate our DNA, our being, into a hardened rock without knowing the full ramifications of what such actions would arise?

Source: [ https://www.dna-diamond.com/ ] “DNA Diamond”

“Suppose there is an opportunity to create a tangible memory of someone who has passed away.
your loved one, your child, your pet.
Their soul, their existence, their DNA processed into the hardest crystal in the world.

It is possible.

DNA Diamonds offers the chance of an eternal existence.
A ship that will never perish.
An everlasting legacy from generation to generation.
A memorial diamond.”

While it may sound appealing to some people, we must realize the tricks and deception that will lead us astray and into a darkened corner where:

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, “1 Timothy 4:1

“See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.”Colossians 2:8

“But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. And many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed. By covetousness they will exploit you with deceptive words;”
2 Peter 2:1-3

But instead we should cease without praying, and build up our spiritual armor, so that we will be able to discern the path to Jesus Christ. We must wonder, a divine being who shuns material possessions would probably not look too fondly upon desecrating a human body solely for the purpose of turning it into a sparkling stone, much less if it is to be used to serve the purpose of satanic forces.

This is not meant to be a harsh assessment. While for many it would make sense that people would like to honor a deceased loved one by keeping them with us in this way, and it would seem a beautiful gesture, the teachings of Christ asks us to give our Earthly/physical life to Him and to pursue the spiritual path instead.

And of course there is the controversial debate that not everybody believes in God/Jesus Christ, and so this topic would be challenged in that regard in the first place. But, that is for each person to decide for themselves. I cannot and will not attempt to dissuade someone from their beliefs. I think we will all come to the Truth in due time, whether it happens to be before our death, during, or after.

But I will say this, for those of us seeking the spiritual path:

“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”
Romans 12:2

“But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.”1 Corinthians 2:14

This gives a whole new meaning to the term “diamond appraisal”… How much is our soul worth?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Rafael Zajczewski from Pixabay

Exposing NASA’s Many Lies

Revealing some dubious actions of the most infamous space enterprise.

Whew! What a rabbit hole, ladies and gentlemen.

After researching the NASA (national aeronautics and space administration) organization and the alleged space explorations they’ve been conducting, I’ve come to my own opinion that it is all one HUGE lie.

Below, we’ll take a look at the many, MANY times NASA has been caught lying, on top of other rather extremely suspicious circumstances.

Enjoy! (or don’t, being massively lied to by a billion-dollar organization on what they’re doing with people’s tax money… also thank the government for that.)

1. Caught staging a simulation or hologram?

The whole video makes a very interesting case about NASA and their illegitimacy, including CGI fakery, strange physics, continuity errors, etc. so I highly encourage viewing the whole video. But at the :30 second mark, you can see a gentleman literally disappearing through an entry port in this alleged spacecraft. This is just one of MANY times the “space exploration” teams have been caught using deception and different kinds of technology to simulate a trip into outer space.

2. NASA caught faking photos

Take a look at the following images and the bizarre excuses and “coincidences” that preside with it:

Some people will try and explain away this picture by stating that NASA had no other choice but to super impose duplicate areas of the Earth onto the image in order to fill in gaps (whatever that means…), but more than likely, someone in the editting room was just too lazy to render the fake image correctly, and quite possibly banked on the idea that people wouldn’t catch them in the act. And with the amount of shills pouring themselves over NASA (are they getting paid to do it?), knew that they would have some misled souls to come to their defense.

This isn’t the only example, by the way. There are tons of them. And this video also proposes additional theories as to what the planets could be textured by.

This image is directly shown on NASA’s own website, allegedly depicting the Earth in 2015. Now, either God is one huge practical joker, or NASA is pulling a fast one over the public’s eyes. Which one do you think it is?

The image on the left shows the landscape in Mauna Kea, Hawaii.

The image on the right shows the moon landscape from the Apollo 17 mission. (supposedly…)

By a bizarre set of pure coincidence, it just so happens that the Apollo 17 astronauts were able to land at a specific distance to that particular hill on the moon, which bears an uncanny resemblance to the same distance as the hill/summit of Mauna Kea. What are the chances?

Did I forget to mention? Mauna Kea was a direct training ground for the Apollo astronauts.

Investigating the Apollo Valley

Buzz Aldrin standing infront of the hills in Mauna Kea, Hawaii. There seems to have been some photo editing going on, as you can see the large mountain in the distance in this photo, but not in the other two. Unless it’s a matter of perspective being on the other side of the hills, coincidentally showing similar geographic terrain.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

This is, quite frankly, the stupidest picture I’ve ever seen. Especially since it’s coming from a corporation who “allegedly” spends billions of dollars a year to explore space, yet they expect us to believe that this is an “actual image” captured from one of their satellites that’s positioned a MILLION miles from Earth. (But hey, I guess they win, because apparently some people DO believe this is real. #sigh – 2016 Tournament Earth Champion: The Dark Side of the Moon)

I worry about the human race. : (

And here is the image of Earth captured from the Apollo 11 mission that supposedly landed on the moon in 1969.

Screenshot taken from nasa.gov website

I don’t believe this is a real image either, but do we see any significant perspective changes between this image “taken in 1969” and the one from 2015? No? Just me? Did the Earth grow exponentially since then?

2011: “Now a new NASA study, published recently in Geophysical Research Letters, has essentially laid those speculations to rest. Using a cadre of space measurement tools and a new data calculation technique, the team detected no statistically significant expansion of the solid Earth.” – NASA research confirms it’s a small world, after all

Whew. I’m glad NASA could put that speculation to rest. Because after all, if it’s coming from NASA, it must be the truth. Still doesn’t explain how the two photos above both came from space though, while depicting the same objects with outrageous size differences. Unless between 2011-2015 the Earth did, in fact, grow to that massive size. Or the moon shrunk. Perhaps NASA will come out with another study to explain this.

3. “Astronauts” in water

The official claim made is that astronauts train underwater because it closely simulates what it would be like to be in outer space with the difference in gravity compared to Earth. However, even if this was a legitimate reason, how would that explain passing off these underwater escapades as actual “space exploration” footage for the public’s viewing pleasure?

This video makes a very compelling case exposing NASA trying to pass off underwater training as real outer space expeditions.

(Almost similar to how they were trying to pass off simulations from rocky Earth terrains as real moon landings…)

4. Obvious Hairspray is Obvious

If it’s a simple matter of keeping hair out of one’s face, even in zero g… then the usual routine would probably involve putting the hair up in a ponytail or a bun, and/or use hairpins.

But THIS:

is utterly ridiculous, and a waste of money.

Are we really to believe that just because someone puts on a ton of hairspray to deliberately style their hair to depict what it may look like in outer space, that everyone is just going to buy this notion and continue on with our blind faith in this dishonest institution?

Well, apparently, because as we all SHOULD know, hair obviously defies the laws of physics and just sticks straight up on space missions and then bounces back into a designated shape, even though a heavier, denser object – like metal (maybe a necklace, say, or a zipper) floats freely around.

And if you watch closely, you can also tell there’s something fishy about the gentleman’s necklace…

5. Responses of astronauts (both former and current) to certain questions/interviews

Source: youtube | Astronauts Gone Wild – MM6

While Bart Sibrel is known for his “ambush” journalism, the takeaway from these interviews is that Mr. Sibrel makes these former astronauts extremely uncomfortable and extremely defensive.

If it was an honest manner of really going to the moon, like they’re claiming, then why are their reactions and responses so hostile, and even in some cases, fearful? Almost as if this investigative journalist is close to finding out the truth and the men involved in this corruption/coverup have been coerced into silence and they take out their vitriol on anyone who comes close to exposing this egregious scheme.

There are many more examples than just this, in which we can see the awkwardness and uncertainty in some of the officials being interviewed, and it lends a significant distrust in the eyes of the public. (At least, if the people haven’t been completely brain-washed by the different establishments – government/education/media, etc.)

Here’s a look at some different transcripts from other cringe-worthy interviews:

If you watch the link connected with this Q/A,  pay close attention to the “astronauts’ ” body language and nervous expressions. Not to mention the rather telling response that was given:

Question:What can we do in an age where, so many people seem so skeptical about what they see and hear to assure them that what they’re seeing from us is, as you explore space is actually real, and uh, can you also tell us where over the Earth you are, about right now?

Answer:Well I think uh, it’s our duty to continue to just produce imagery of all types. Video imagery and still imagery, and we’ll do it with a, integrity, and uh, and the more we put out there the more real it becomes to everyone.

NASA Busted! Clone tool overusage. Space is a photoshop production!

Keep in mind, low-Earth orbit is considered to be between 160-2,000 km (99-1200 miles), and by NASA’s own admission, the moon (which astronauts allegedly landed on in the late 60’s-70’s) is estimated to be ~384,000 km (238,855 miles).

3:37 – 3:50:But we’re also really pushing the boundaries in terms of where we’re going forward with exploration. I think, uh, humans are naturally driven to do this, and this is really the beginning, I think, of human beings leaving low-Earth orbit.

4:08 – 4:51:The plan that NASA has is to build a rocket called SOS, which is a heavy-lift rocket. It’s something that is, that is much bigger than what we have today, and it will be able to launch the Orion capsule with humans on board, as well as landers or other components to destinations beyond Earth orbit.

Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That’s the farthest that we can go. And this new system that we’re building is going to allow us to go beyond, and hopefully take humans into the solar system to explore, so- the moon, Mars, asteroids, there’s a lot of destinations that we could go to and we’re building these building block components in order to allow us to do that eventually.

NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

6. A threat to contact CIA to “wax” a researcher

At the end of Bart Sibrel’s “interview” with Ed Mitchell – as we can see at the end of the “Astronauts Gone Wild” video posted above, we not only have the direct threat from Mr. Mitchell to get a gun and shoot Bart, but then his son speaks up and says quite plainly, “Want to call the CIA and have them waxed?

Waxed for what, exactly? Questioning the NASA narrative that the moon walk was real? Coming to that house/office under “false pretenses”? Accusing him of satanic participation? (Michael Aquino, anyone?)

Are these legitimate reasons to have someone waxed? What about using taxpayers’ money to fraudulently claim to going to the moon just to have something to show for it while using that money for other reasons? Why are all these astronauts so concerned with the moral ethics of this journalist, and not their own moral ethics for possibly lying to billions of people while simultaneously protecting the industry who is working to deceive and manipulate everyone into following a certain scientific belief?

As some people have proposed, could these “astronauts” have been mind-controlled by the CIA into believing the very tale that the government/NASA has perpetrated worldwide, and/or these astronauts inherently know that they are in the wrong, but are under compliance as a means of “national security”?

After all, if the son of Edgar Mitchell was so cavalier as to announce that they basically have the CIA on speed dial (I may be embellishing the story a little – but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was close to the truth) to “take care of” opposition, it ties into the theory that the CIA was(is) indeed closely tied to the NASA missions. – NASA’s Secret Relationships with U.S. Defense and Intelligence Agencies

7. NASA logo

Not everything has to be about exposing the lies and cover-up that NASA in engaged in. Just take a look at their logo, which is obviously meant to depict a snake tongue flicking out towards Earth.

Why is that so suspect?

Well, when you have several other organizations, like the WHO (medical industry in general) and the Vatican, both of which are, imho, corrupt factions, that use a snake as their logo – not to mention the biblical side of things depicting the serpent as the wicked, sinful entity causing the fall of man, AND the fact that the serpent (many who claim is Satan/Devil/Lucifer) is called the “FATHER OF LIES” and “THE DECEIVER” – along with many other flattering nicknames, it makes one wonder the true reason why they would use the snake as their logo.

(Not to mention there’s some heated debate that nasa literally means “to deceive” in Hebrew. A lot of people claim that tptsb love to use symbolism and play on words/origin to indicate what they’re doing in secret. Another interesting coincidence: Neil A. (Armstrong) is “alien” backwards. Funny how he was the very first person that landed on the moon.)

Sure some may argue that it’s not really a snake tongue and instead some ribbon or some yada yada yada, but research into these organizations and their motives would suggest otherwise.

Back in 1830, there is an account of a vision of Mary who appeared to St. Catherine Labouré and told her to make a model of this vision: Mary, standing on a snake, which is curled on top of the Earth. What does this “Miraculous Medalreally mean?

8. Excuses, excuses, excuses

When was the last time we went to the moon?

1972? But why?

Because of this?

US spaceflight operations were focused entirely on Low Earth Orbit activities, as well as admirable cooperative international programs such as the International Space Station, and major scientific instruments such as Mars Pathfinder, Opportunity/Spirit and Curiosity. Other major concerns have redirected US attentions from spaceflight: the United States’ War on Terror, which is expected to cost US taxpayers over $5 trillion dollars in the long run.The Real Story Of Apollo 17… And Why We Never Went Back To The Moon

Really?

Or how about this reason?

A 2005 report by NASA estimated that returning to the moon would cost about $104 billion ($133 billion today, with inflation) over about 13 years. The Apollo program cost about $120 billion in today’s dollars.

Manned exploration is the most expensive space venture and, consequently, the most difficult for which to obtain political support,” Cunningham said during his testimony.Astronauts explain why nobody has visited the moon in more than 45 years — and the reasons are depressing

(Yes. Please don’t waste ANYMORE taxpayers money on staged programs that are a complete farce. Thank you.)

Maybe it’s THIS reason: ALIENS Here’s the real reason why NASA never returned to the Moon (Video)

Or this laughable reason: I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again.NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

No, I think the real reason is that we’ve never been to begin with.

9.  Debate on the physics of the spacecraft landing

This is just a supposition, but if NASA really did go to the moon in 1969, and the total weight of the lunar lander when it landed was supposedly around 24 tons, of course not counting the gravity difference between the moon and the Earth (if that is even true…), one could wonder why there is no apparent disturbance to the ground underneath the spacecraft. Even a light bicycle will kick up some dust and disturb the terrain, depending on the conditions of the ground, of course.

Yet with this event, we are to believe that a 24 ton spacecraft merely spread out dust away from underneath the landing area and did nothing more to the ground. Due to our limited knowledge of the exact nature of the moon’s composition, it is honestly hard to say what this massive spacecraft could do.

However, if we take the following video into account, showing how easy it was for Neil Armstrong to disturb the dust around his feet, even kicking up the dust in a similar fashion to that of Earth:

And then seeing one of the legs of the craft on the solid ground, undisturbed by any collection of dust/sand/etc., compared to the footsteps RIGHT NEXT to it, clearly showing deep impressions from a much lighter object (a human being), I’m going to have to call B.S. on this whole operation. Even with the amount of distribution at the bottom of each leg, the physics of this phenomena do not add up.

And it is NOT indented into the ground on one side, as some people have proposed:

As with everything that NASA has been caught out on, they have some “scientific mumbo-jumbo” to try and back themselves up, as well as the poor deluded people that refuse to believe anything untowards is happening; other than conspiratorial minds just coming up with “crazy theories” due to their paranoia, that is. Refusing to look at the data and the evidence and instead just becoming talking points for this deceptive company and rehashing everything they’re peddling, is a tragic sign of how far mass manipulation has become.

10. “Moon rocks” came from Earth

Soon after Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins’ return to Earth from the Apollo mission, a moon rock was given to Willem Drees Jr. as a gift:

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing.” – Moon Rock Turns Out to be Fake

However, after scientific study of this rock, concluded that it was actually petrified wood.

And from the Apollo 14 mission, a 1.8 gram specimen was suspected of coming from Earth, having many qualities of rock compositions from our planet than what scientists would expect from the moon.

Research author Professor Alexander Nemchin, from Curtin’s School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said in a statement the tiny 1.8-gram sample of Moon rock is similar in composition to granite.

The expert said: “The sample also contains quartz, which is an even more unusual find on the Moon.”

Professor Nemchin also added, “It is possible that some of these unusual conditions could have occurred very locally and very briefly on the Moon and the sample is a result of this brief deviation from normality.

However, a simpler explanation is that this piece was formed on the Earth and brought to the surface of the Moon as a meteorite generated by an asteroid hitting Earth about four billion years ago, and throwing material into space and to the Moon.” – NASA Moon landing SHOCK: Apollo 14 Moon rock sample came from EARTH – Not from space

Uh huh. An even simpler, simpler explanation is that they never went to the moon at all.

BONUS:

The questionable build of the lunar lander aside (just look at it), while capturing just the little bit of Earth off in the distance in 1969… compared to their award-winning Earth and moon photo in 2015/2016…

lol

It’s crazy the amount of things that NASA has been caught fibbing in; from their numerous shady interviews with supposed astronauts, who can’t come to the same conclusion of whether they could see stars in space or not, to the very obvious fake images. Keep in mind, this is just a very small list of the suspicious actions that NASA has engaged in. And it’s even crazier that people still believe these lies.

Sadly, until people open their eyes and finally concede that NASA and the government have been implementing this duplicitous scheme, the world will continue to be led astray. “Space” is not the answer.

And on another rather related mystery, I propose that there may just be a dome/firmament around us (that the world leaders don’t want us to know about), but that is another topic for a different day.

For additional reading into NASA’s very suspicious establishment, please visit the following websites:

NASA’S TRILLION DOLLAR TREASON
Something Shady About NASA
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”