More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative?

We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?

A video that has gone viral in the last few days exposes medical “authorities” proposing underhanded tactics and straight up lies and fear-mongering attempts in order to push vaccines onto more of the public.

There have been many attempts at deceiving the public regarding the COVID/vaccine narrative, or just flat-out conflicting information that doesn’t make any sense when actually thinking about the statements.

The below sections take a look at just a small few of them, starting with the video mentioned above:

1. Novant Health administrator suggesting to deliberately scare/manipulate people into getting the vaccine:

Some embellishment is added for emphasis. Some words were undetermined due to unclear audio:

Carolyn Fisher: ” – the dashboard on how it’s set up myself, as far as how we get information out to the community on meaningful numbers – we set on a weekly basis. So that’s on our website, and we’ve been sharing that through social channels as well. Particularly those graphics that show the number of patients and how’s the percentage of them that are unvaccinated – percentage of unvaccinated people in the ICU, and the percentage of deaths. And the numbers. So those are numbers that we put out as far as, we don’t get into details of floor – Those other numbers are certainly out there.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “I guess my feeling at this point in time is, maybe we need to be completely, a little bit more scary for the public. Then there’s another […], that I completely agree, there are many people still hospitalized that we’re considering post-COVID. But we’re not counting in those numbers. So how do we include those post-COVID people, in the numbers of patients we have in the hospital?”

Carolyn Fisher: “So is that all the people who have been in a hospital since the beginning of COVID?”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Well, or those that are still in, and that’s something that I can take to someone else. But, I think those are important numbers, of patients that are still in the hospital, that are off the COVID floor, but still occupying the hospital for a variety of reasons.”

Shelbourn Stevens: “Carolyn, we call those – I’m sorry – we’re calling those “recovered” now; if you look at the […] dashboard, they’re listed as “recovered”. But I do think it – from our standpoint, we would still consider them a COVID patient, cause they’re still healing.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Yep. So I think that that needs to be highlighted as well. Because once they’re off isolation and drop from the COVID numbers, that’s exactly right.”

Shelbourn Stevens: “Carolyn, we can talk offline, and how we run that up, to marketing.”

Mary Kathryn Rudyk: “Right. So I was going to say that I think we have to be more blunt, we have to be more forceful, we have to say something coming out, ‘You know, you don’t get vaccinated, you know you’re going to die.’ I mean, let’s just, let’s just be really blunt to these people.”

There’s a lot to unravel in this brief discussion, but it all boils down to this: Mary Kathryn Rudyk suggests inundating the public with FEAR that COVID is such a deadly disease and that if you don’t get vaccinated, ‘you’re going to die’; yet in the very same discussion, acknowledges that there are many people who have recovered from COVID and are sometimes referred to as “post-COVID”.

Then if one wants to further expand upon this discussion, alleging that Rudyk is announcing this to also try and benefit the healthcare workers so that they are not overwhelmed with COVID-infected (or COVID-recovered) patients, I would have to bring up the point that there have been prophylactic treatments available to help prevent one from going to the hospital, yet these treatments are being SUPPRESSED from the public and denounced all around the healthcare industry and mainstream media/social media platforms.

If it’s about our health, then why are approved, well-known, beneficial, effective treatments being taken away from public use and ridiculed, and even in some cases, outlawed?

Maybe it’s because… it’s not about our health?

2. American Medical Association trains their healthcare members to label “hospitalization rates” as “deaths”

Another health organization that has been caught directly trying to lie and manipulate the public has been exposed by what they are training their associates to say in order to either sugar-coat certain terminology, or by outright blatant fear-mongering attempts in order to produce the results they want. (i.e. more and more people getting vaccinated)

At first, I couldn’t believe this was really real, until I checked it out for myself; and indeed, it is all stated there, right on the pdf of their website.

This information was first brought to my attention through the Stew Peters Show with Dr. Bryan Ardis. The video describing some of the incredibly outrageous deceptive tactics the AMA teaches members of its organization can be watched below:

A couple of screenshots are provided, with a link from the web archive:

Screenshot taken on September 14, 2021 from
[ https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2021-02/covid-19-vaccine-guide-english.pdf / pg. 9]
Web Archive version: COVID-19 Vaccine Guide

Instead of “Operation warp speed” – say “Standard process”
Instead of “Government” – say “Public health agencies”
Instead of “Hospitilization rates” – say “Deaths”

There is also the eerie, cult-like mentality that the AMA endorses their members to propagate on social media platforms and during interviews. A small portion of that has been captured in the below screenshot:

Screenshot taken on September 14, 2021 from
[ https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2021-02/covid-19-vaccine-guide-english.pdf / pg. 2]
Web Archive version: COVID-19 Vaccine Guide

– “I will get vaccinated as soon as it is available, as will my family. #TrustScience #COVID19”

– “I trust the scientific process and the rigorous peer review for the coronavirus vaccines. #TrustScience #COVID19”

– “I trust a vaccine endorsed by scientists, career public health professionals, my doctor, and the mainstream medical community. #TrustScience”

The egregious step to label “hospitalization rates” as “deaths” aside, which is insane as it is, I couldn’t help but get chills when reading the indoctrination-like proclamations of the social template content.

That is exactly what these industries and agencies want: blind trust to those in “authoritative” positions.

3. Israeli Health Minister caught on hot-mic: “there is no medical or epidemiological justification for the COVID passport, it is only intended to pressure the unvaccinated to vaccinate.”

I don’t expect the tweet to last long (perhaps I’ll be proven wrong), so I have provided a screenshot of the snippet in question:

Source: twitter | @disclose.tv

I can’t personally verify the translation since I don’t speak the language, but the following excerpts come from the following source: Caught on hot mic, Israeli health minister says ‘green pass’ not based on epidemiology

“Imposing “green pass” rules on certain venues is needed only to pressure members of the public to get vaccinated, and not for medical reasons, Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz said on Sunday, ahead of the weekly Cabinet meeting.

Horowitz was caught on a hot mic telling this to Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked, who was also unaware that the conversation was being taped and would be broadcast on Channel 12 News.

In response to Shaked’s suggestion that the “green pass” could be removed as a requirement for outdoor seating at restaurants, Horowitz said: “For swimming pools, too, not just in restaurants.”

“Epidemiologically, it’s true,” said Horowitz, adding, “The thing is, I’m telling you, our problem is people who don’t get vaccinated. We need [to influence] them a bit; otherwise, we won’t get out of this [pandemic situation].”

Here is another resource for further consideration:

Source: twitter | @EdladYaniv

Text translated using: Hebrew to English translation

“And now the unbelievable video is that it is exactly the opposite of what The Minister of Health told The High Court:

Health Minister Nitzan Horwitz explains to Sarah Ayelet Shaked that in some places the green giver is not necessary and is only to pressure Israelis to get vaccinated.

And this is exactly the opposite of what the Health Minister told The Begach “that the green tag is net health considerations.”

And this is Chairman Meretz.”

More lies, more influencing, more pressure, more threats, more deception.

When will the world wake up?

4. Vaccines and vaccine passports are only valid for 6 months. After that – you need more vaccines.

Again highlighting Israeli’s Health Minister, Dr. Horowitz, who has admitted that the vaccines are not about one’s health, is implementing the following protocols for their country – another under-handed tactic that is being used to trick the public into more unnecessary vaccines.

“Israel’s vaccine passport QR-code system, Green Pass, will now expire six months after the second injection is received, making a third, and possibly fourth, booster shot effectively mandatory to continue participation in Israel’s mainstream society.

On Aug. 29, Israeli health officials announced at a press conference that effective Oct. 1, fully vaccinated Green Pass validation status would expire six months after the second dose is received, according to news website Arutz Sheva.”

Additionally, citizens returning from overseas travel who have accepted a third injection will be required to quarantine for only 24 hours after arrival. Those who only have two doses are no longer considered fully vaccinated and will be sequestered for 7 days.

On Aug. 24, Haaretz reported Health Minister Nitan Horowitz as saying in comments given on Channel 13 Television, “This is simply because, in terms of its effectiveness, the vaccine is valid only for a period of five or six months.”

“After about half a year, you have to get a third dose. Otherwise, the vaccine loses its power.”

– Source: Israel Vaccine Passport Now Expires After Six Months, Boosters Required

So according to Israeli’s Health Minister, the vaccine is only beneficial for up to 6 months. After that, you will have to get another. And then, after those 6 months are up, then what? Another? And then another? And another? 2 per year COVID shots, in addition to the yearly flu shot? Do I have that correct?

(And do I need to mention Pfizer’s new venture in supplying – out of the goodness of their hearts, I’m sure – a two-pill-a-day regiment to combat COVID symptoms? Of course it’s about our health and not lining their pockets to make them richer. Of course. Because it’s not like we already have a cheap alternative at treating our symptoms that is curiously being continuously suppressed in the news all to steer our focus on their new, more costly product. That would just be ridiculous…)

5. FDA’s own admission: “While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

The FDA has been caught red-handed removing this particular portion from their Frequently Asked Questions webpage.

On August 31, 2021, I took a screenshot of the following information from the FDA’s own website, under the question:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Here was their response, as of August 23, 2021:

As you can see, I had to retrieve this information from the wayback machine because strangely enough, on September 1st, 2021 – the very next day after I was able to screenshot this data, the FDA removed this portion from their site.

[https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions] – (content as of September 14, 2021 shows the latest current update as September 1, 2021]

What could have occurred, within 7 days of their “current content”, to decide to remove this very telling statement? Did new data suggesting that the vaccines do prevent infections, symptoms and transmissions suddenly come out within that very brief time period? Or, more likely, they realized that this statement does not reflect the worldwide pressure to get everyone vaccinated?

Speaking of, even the “president” of the United States is conflicted on if the vaccines work or not.

6. Joe Biden: “The bottom line – we’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers.”

“My job as president is to protect all Americans.

So tonight I’m announcing that the Department of Labor is developing an emergency rule to require all employers with 100 or more employees, that together employ over 80 million workers, to ensure their workforces are fully vaccinated or show a negative test at least once a week.

Some of the biggest companies are already requiring this: United Airlines, Disney, Tyson’s Foods – and even Fox News.

The bottom line – we’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers.”

Source: twitter | @POTUS

Um… isn’t the whole point of getting the vaccine to protect oneself from the “virus”, and in the same vein, the unvaccinated? Why does the vaccinated need protection from the unvaccinated? They are supposedly already protected BECAUSE of the vaccine.

At least, that’s what we were always told from the CDC, FDA, government officials, medical/health authorities, etc. At least, until they decided to flip-flop on their assessment and change their definitions. And at least until new “variants” popped out. … And until they misled the public by removing pertinent information from their own websites. And until… well, you get the point. (maybe)

Then we have Joe Biden’s VP also chiming in with her two cents:

“By vaccinating the unvaccinated, increasing our testing and masking, and protecting the vaccinated, we can end this pandemic. That’s exactly what we are committed to doing.”

Source: twitter | @KamalaHarris

The actual bottom line, they are basically admitting that the vaccine doesn’t work. They’ve already admitted they don’t know how long the vaccines last. Dr. Horowitz mentions no longer than 5-6 months. But for all we know, the vaccines “last” 3 days, if they even work at all. How long have you, personally, gone without COVID (or even the flu/common cold) before and after the vaccine? (If you chose to get one?)

After over 20 months, I’ve gotten sick one time that only lasted 4 days, and even then my symptoms were extremely mild. No flu, no runny nose, just a slight sore throat that went away after 4 days. Meanwhile, I’ve had friends get sick shortly RIGHT AFTER the injection. But, you know, they would’ve been considered “unvaccinated” at that point still…

Which brings me to:

7. “Unvaccinated are filling the hospitals!”

Really…? Hm… well, when you consider who they (CDC/FDA/health agencies) consider as “unvaccinated”, it’s no wonder.

Did you know, anyone who is not considered “fully vaccinated” – meaning, 14 days after their second dose, if it’s a two-dose regiment, or 14 days after a single dose if it’s a single-dose only regiment, is considered either a “partially vaccinated” or an “unvaccinated” person, depending on the honesty of the hospitals to report them?

Trust the Science? CDC Counts People Who Died Within 14 Days of Jab as “Unvaccinated”

To put that more clearly, if you get the second vaccine, and get “COVID” (sick/heart attack/myocarditis/blood clots/flu/etc.) 13 days after the shot, YOU CAN STILL BE CONSIDERED AN UNVACCINATED INDIVIDUAL.

Which goes without saying, but if you are experiencing side effects or illnesses a day or two after the first vaccine – they consider you an unvaccinated person. To think of it a different way, by the time you get the first Pfizer shot (and if you’re diligent in getting the second shot 3 weeks from the first), it will take you 35 days before they consider you a fully vaccinated person. For Moderna, that would be 42 days, again assuming you were diligent in getting your second shot right on time.

So if you get sick at any time during this time period and have to be admitted, the hospitals are allowed to write you up as an unvaccinated/partially vaccinated person.

Another interesting thing to consider, if you did get injected, the hospitals do not have to test you unless you present SEVERE symptoms of “COVID”. So this, obviously, is left up to the specific hospital to determine what is “severe” to them. If you have the flu, tossing and turning, throwing up, shivering, crying in pain, etc. – “Well, it’s not severe enough. It’s obviously not COVID. We don’t have to test them.”

Think this might have something to do with the COVID numbers showing more favorably to the vaccinated cases?

Not to mention that even if the vaccinated individual does get tested, the PCR tests were recommended to use a lower set of cycles for them. …Hm, I’m sure that wouldn’t have anything to do with returning a negative result; thus again, making it seem like the vaccines are working.

But I’m sure the hospital system isn’t that corrupt, right? There’s no way they’d be involved in such deliberate manipulation and misconduct, right? Even though these are all protocols that come from the CDC and other government health agencies…? Surely they just care about our well-being even though there have been studies that prove that in the majority of people natural immunity is by-far superior than shady, no long-term data vaccines, right?

Covid-19 natural immunity compared to vaccine-induced immunity: The definitive summary

“They can’t be lying. They wouldn’t do that. They were just mistaken, is all. They’re following the science. It’s science – science changes, you know. No, no, I’m sure that the government and health/pharma industries that are making a lot of money right now due to side effects from… well, not from the vaccines, obviously – it has to be from something else – I’m sure that they care about us far more than my idiot family members who I’ve lived with for all my life and who have raised me and bought me presents and clothed and fed me.

I mean, just look at everything the government and health agencies and other large corporations has offered me for injecting myself with an experimental vaccine! Beer, donuts, McDonald’s, sports and concert tickets, pizza, marijuana, cash – You all are silly if you don’t think the government wants what’s best for us.

‘Lying’…. pfft.”

So… yeah… I’m just going to direct you back up to number 1, again.

I realize how I may sound on this post. It’s not my intention to sound condescending, and I apologize if that’s how I come off. But in certain times, like what’s going on around us today, if it sounds harsh, maybe it needs to be.

When looking at the situation around us, I find it hard to comprehend that there are still people that believe the official narrative even after everything that’s been presented to us. It almost feels as if the events going on around us are deliberately conceived and obviously created to induce as much unbelievable situations to see how people will respond to it. Perhaps like a test to see how much the governments can get away with and still have people believe them. Sadly, a large group have had the wool pulled over their eyes, and simply go along with the establishment without even thinking about it.

Actually, now that I think about it, maybe this really is their goal. It not only helps them along with their corrupt endeavors, whatever that should be, but it also is a means to employ as many people who still believe their narrative to help them achieve it.

What do you think? Are you thinking? Do you know people who are just following along, without a second thought? Or even worse, indulging in a self-righteous attitude that they’re right and everyone else who doesn’t simply follow this narrative is wrong? Ignoring all of the obvious signs that this is just an agenda set to vaccinate everyone, leading up to controlling every aspect of our lives?

This is happening. The government and health officials continue lying because people still fall for it. If you’re reading this, chances are you already know about the deception and lies that we’re being told to continue forcing this unnecessary vaccine on all of us. I’d say it’s very rare for a person who has already bought into the narrative to read a post exposing the corporations on their lies and manipulation. And if that person does read a post similar to this one, will they contemplate on the information within, or automatically dismiss it as a crazy “conspiracy theory”?

There are truths out there for you. But you need to be willing to accept it.

"It's easier to fool people, than to convince them they have been fooled."
- quote often attributed to Mark Twain

I love you all. Even the ones who haven’t woken up to the scam or who simply don’t believe it. And I know it’s weird to say, but I even love the ones perpetrating the scam. They need it the most. There is something twisted and broken within them, and I literally pray for their soul. I hope in the near future, all of us will realize the actions we’re doing to others, and rise up and grow in truth and compassion, instead of remaining in this state of division.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay [slightly modified]

Get an Earful

Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.
Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK - Open letter from several healthcare professions to the UK government/administrators.

Pfizer-BioNTech/COMIRNATY Vaccine Is Still Under “STUDY” Runs to be Completed at Different Intervals Between 2022-2026

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

In addition to the many debates and conflicts surrounding the “approval” of the Pfizer/BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, there is interesting information to glean from the documents involved surrounding this controversy.

The below documents, some from the FDA’s own website, sheds further light into what seems to be a product still in its experimental/study phase. Some of the revelations are chilling, and doesn’t quite give the reassurance that an “approved” drug of this magnitude is more beneficial to us than what it is purported to be saving us from.

Screenshot of the FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves First COVID-19 Vaccine
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Selected quotes in gray text boxes are from the above document:

“Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.

Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease.

More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months.

The most commonly reported side effects by those clinical trial participants who received Comirnaty were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, chills, and fever. The vaccine is effective in preventing COVID-19 and potentially serious outcomes including hospitalization and death.”

There are a couple of notes to take away from this document. In the above quote, it doesn’t quite specify how long the clinical trial lasted. Only that more than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for 4 months after the second dose. It also states that 12,000 of the recipients were followed for at least 6 months.

Both of these numbers (4 and 6) are incredibly low quantities when taking into account pregnant women who are at the beginning of their pregnancy. The length of the clinical trial does not take into account the full 9 months needed to determine a healthy pregnancy, nor does it allow for any time to safely assess the development of the baby once born.

The data in this document also does not include differences between those of the placebo group compared to that of the “vaccine” group. In addition, if we are to only take the 12,000 participants into account, which from the wording of the document seems to allude that these are the recipients of the vaccine, that would still leave 10,000 participants unaccounted for. Just from the amount of vaccine recipients (22,000), this is 45% of their study that the data does not reflect. If we are to include the 22,000 of the participants who received the placebo, the data that was not tracked would rise to 72%.

There is also the challenge of how they determined that the vaccine actually prevented COVID. Were these recipients exposed to someone with COVID or were deliberately inoculated with the disease to see if they would get infected? Many people, myself included, have gone on for more than a year without developing COVID, or at least “COVID symptoms”. Since this data only involved a 4-6 month trial period, how many of us (vaccinated, placebo, or otherwise) can say that we have not contracted COVID during this time-frame either? Is this implying that unless you’re vaccinated, you will most likely get COVID every 4-6 months?

Another consideration to take into account are the many testimonies from well-respected and renowned doctors/scientists/virologists who are adamant in their assessment that these vaccines are unnecessary and instead further harms the immune system rather than help it.

In the same regard, those who are unvaccinated will obviously then not contract any of the possible side effects that are listed in this document as well as the many adverse events that are reported to VAERS. Which leaves one to wonder if the benefits really outweigh the risks of the COVID vaccines.

There is also the slight alteration on a different page of the FDA website that gives further clarification as to the efficacy of the COVID vaccines – which does not reflect that of what many people are influenced to believe:

Under the heading:

Q: What safety information did FDA evaluate to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for emergency use and approve Comirnaty?

Screenshot of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
taken on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content Current as of August 23, 2021

UPDATE on September 6, 2021: Since the FDA website decided to remove this particular section from their FAQ (as of 9/1/2021), here is a screenshot taken from the web archive showing its existence:

“While the vaccine may not prevent infection, symptoms or transmission of the virus from person to person – “

This seems to be the heart of the matter, and although it continues with, “it is effective in preventing hospitalization and death.” it is in direct conflict with what we were led to believe this whole time. Most of the mainstream media, big tech platforms, health agencies, etc. have insisted that vaccines are needed to stop transmission of the virus and to protect those around us. However, this one simple statement defies everything that people were coerced into believing.

And with the last part of the sentence concluding that it prevents hospitalization and death, which even that is debatable when looking at the scope of the situation, it leaves one to wonder why this would not be an option for people to decide to take that risk on their own account. When comparing data of young individuals as well and their extremely low risk of hospitalization and death in the COVID setting, there ARE acknowledged threats when they are injected with the vaccine.

“Additionally, the FDA conducted a rigorous evaluation of the post-authorization safety surveillance data pertaining to myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and has determined that the data demonstrate increased risks, particularly within the seven days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-up suggest that most individuals have had resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.”

The FDA is also acknowledging that there are higher risks involved with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in males aged 12-17, and up to age 40.

“Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes.”

“In addition, the FDA is requiring the company to conduct postmarketing studies to further assess the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. These studies will include an evaluation of long-term outcomes among individuals who develop myocarditis following vaccination with Comirnaty. In addition, although not FDA requirements, the company has committed to additional post-marketing safety studies, including conducting a pregnancy registry study to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy.”

The document is also stating that the possibility of myocarditis and pericarditis is an accepted issue and will continue to be monitored after the marketing of the Comirnaty vaccine.

And in a rather blunt admission, FDA states on their own website that Comirnaty is not required to evaluate pregnancy and infant outcomes after receipt of Comirnaty during pregnancy. This would explain why the initial trial run was only monitored for 4-6 months. An outline in the BLA (Biologics License Approval) also states that Comirnaty will conduct studies on this group as we see in a later section.

BLA documents state Comirnaty vaccine studies to be conducted for the next several years

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text below is page 5 of the FDA BLA Approval document

Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 505B(a) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of
these postmarketing studies must be reported according to 21 CFR 601.28 and section
505B(a)(4)(C) of the FDCA. In addition, section 506B of the FDCA and 21 CFR 601.70
require you to report annually on the status of any postmarketing commitments or
required studies or clinical trials.

Label your annual report as an “Annual Status Report of Postmarketing Study
Requirement/Commitments”
and submit it to the FDA each year within 60 calendar
days of the anniversary date of this letter until all Requirements and Commitments
subject to the reporting requirements under section 506B of the FDCA are released or
fulfilled. These required studies are listed below:

1. Deferred pediatric Study C4591001 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in children 12 years through 15 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: October 7, 2020

Study Completion: May 31, 2023

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2023

2. Deferred pediatric Study C4591007 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants and children 6 months to <12 years of age.

Final Protocol Submission: February 8, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

3. Deferred pediatric Study C4591023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of
COMIRNATY in infants <6 months of age.

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: July 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2024

Submit the protocols to your IND 19736, with a cross-reference letter to this BLA STN
BL 125742 explaining that these protocols were submitted to the IND. Please refer to
the PMR sequential number for each study/clinical trial and the submission number as
shown in this letter.

Submit final study reports to this BLA STN BL 125742. In order for your PREA PMRs to
be considered fulfilled, you must submit and receive approval of an efficacy or a labeling supplement. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to these required
pediatric postmarketing studies must be clearly designated as:

• Required Pediatric Assessment(s)

As the document states, the completion study of Comirnaty postmarketing (after approval) is not due until May 31, 2023 / Novermber 20, 2023 / July 31, 2024 respective of older to lower age groups. There is also another important acronym to consider, which is the IND, which stands for Investigational New Drug.

With this knowledge in hand, it’s important to note that the clinical trial run was monitored for 4-6 months after the second dose on around 55% of the recipients, while the actual “approved” drug still in its investigational/study stages is set to be monitored for 2-3 years. This is a sizeable difference in the amount of time to determine safety and efficacy, especially when considering the many events already reported to VAERS. And according to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions page from the FDA website:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Are vaccine providers required to report side effects?
A: Providers administering Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine must report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and to Pfizer the following information associated with the vaccine of which they become aware:
  • Vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event
  • Serious adverse events (irrespective of attribution to vaccination)
  • Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
  • Cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

Acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis issues being studied on children

” – known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis”

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 6-8 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events
reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known
serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of
subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under
section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.

Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are
required to conduct the following studies:

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of
the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate
the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of
COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021

Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022

Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study
Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis
and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021

Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021

Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022

Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022

Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023

Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023

Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and
pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022

Study Completion: March 31, 2024

Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for
potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration
with Pediatric Heart Network).

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2026

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a
subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021

Study Completion: November 30, 2023

Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical
myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of
participants 16 to 30 years of age.

We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states
that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:

Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2022

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022

It is interesting that the timing to be considered for approval of these vaccines was only a 4-6 month timeframe, however, known dangers/risks, identified as “serious”, are still allowed to be approved and to be studied for 2+ years.

The document also recognizes that myocarditis and pericarditis is enough of a concern to happen after administration of the Comirnaty vaccine, since it mentions several studies just for this specific adverse event, and to continue to assess these reports.

In addition to all of the substudies to be conducted, there is a study to be initiated on a select group of participants to administer a third dose of the Comirnaty vaccine.

All of this information leads credence to the fact that even though the Comirnaty vaccine has “officially been approved” by the FDA, it is still in the investigational stages and being experimented upon on the public. And it goes without saying, but if myocarditis and pericarditis (on top of other reported side effects) are serious risks especially in children (“The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.”), then for this known risk to be offered to infants/toddlers defies any ethically moral boundaries and is in direct violations of the Nuremberg Code.

The next section also provides further evidence that there have been NO studies in the safety/efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine on pregnant women.

Pregnancy/Births were not studied during the initial Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty trial runs

Another snippet from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions website page, states the following:

Screenshot taken from the FDA Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Frequently Asked Questions
on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions ]
Content current as of August 23, 2021

Q: Can pregnant or breastfeeding women receive the Comirnaty or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine?

A: While there have been no specific studies in these groups, there is no contraindication to receipt of the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss potential benefits and risks of vaccination with their healthcare provider.

The acknowledgement above seems to indicate that the FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty company have side-stepped this particular group in their vaccine studies, and have left it up to the healthcare provider to determine whether or not to administer this vaccine to pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. This alone should be enough of a statement that there is no sufficient/professional data to analyze if the Comirnaty is safe during pregnancies/breastfeeding stages.

And if one were to consider the VAERS reporting system, in which the Pfizer-BioNTech company is required to report to, there have been numerous conditions of miscarriages/stillbirths/complications during pregnancy after administration of the COVID vaccine. While it is difficult to determine if these complications were a direct result of the vaccine, it is up to the scientific/healthcare community to investigate these cases in a thorough, unbiased and uninfluenced manner.

Another extremely alarming section of the FDA BLA Approval documents shows the following trial to be monitored in pregnant women:

Screenshot taken from from the FDA BLA Approval on August 31, 2021
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
Document dated August 23, 2021

Text in the gray box below are from pages 9-10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]
POSTMARKETING COMMITMENTS SUBJECT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
UNDER SECTION 506B

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:

10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during
Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and
Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists
(OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.”

Final Protocol Submission: July 1, 2021

Study Completion: June 30, 2025

Final Report Submission: December 31, 2025

There are a couple of key takeaways in this section that are of incredible importance. One major term to focus on is the word “NON-INTERVENTIONAL“.

According to What is a Non Interventional Study?, “In general, a non interventional study (NIS) (also called a non interventional trial) is where a patient takes regular medicine, prescribed according to the label. In an NIS, the researcher sets out to exert as little influence as possible on the patient’s condition while studying a medicine’s “…effectiveness, safety and tolerability under real life conditions” (Mishra & Vora, 2010).”

The article also reiterates multiple times that “non-interventional” studies are observational studies – the researchers are not to interfere with the dosages in any way but to prescribe them exactly as listed on the label. It also seems to imply that even if severe side effects show up, they are to still carry through with the “medicinal product” in that patient as prescribed. Another insinuation that one can make is that in order to not interfere with the study, it is not recommended to prescribe treatments that may help alleviate potential side effects. The term “tolerability” is implying to keep the patient going through the side effects in order to continue to study the long-term effects of the investigational new drug.

However, with the inclusion of “real life conditions”, it doesn’t indicate whether the patient can seek out physicians to investigate what is causing the side effects in their system and engage in therapeutic treatments to alleviate these effects. If a study is to be conducted in real life conditions, then it is to be expected that patients will seek treatments on their own while the researcher is only required to observe the patient to see how the alternative treatments interact with the drug/symptoms.

The same article goes on to state that the UK/EU have different definitions of what “non-interventional” means. “Aronson (2004) states… “the term ‘non-interventional’ in the Directive doesn’t mean non-interventional (i.e. non-interference) at all; it refers to an intervention with a licensed medicinal product.”

There is controversy and conflicts in this statement as another article, Interventional or Non-Interventional? Analyzing the Differences Between Clinical Studies Using Medicines in the European Union points out:

“Although defined in DIR 2001/20/EC, non-interventional studies are outside its scope. Due to the lack of harmonized regulation, some studies designed to be non‑interventional may be considered clinical trials by EU authorities. The two blinded studies described in Table 4 (see PDF) were considered clinical trials in the EU for planning on collection of data to support the marketing authorization application of experimental IMPs, despite no IMP being given and normal clinical practice being kept during the study period. Sponsors are thus advised to consult with authorities when planning studies under these conditions and/or whenever the objectives or design may raise questions.”

Further in the article, it states the following, which again, is not reassuring considering the policies/guidelines/mandates that authorities have been engaging in in order to mandate these investigational new drugs (COVID vaccines) onto the public:

“There is no centralized submission procedure for non-interventional studies with the exception of non-interventional PASSs, imposed as an obligation by an EU competent authority.{9} Because non-interventional studies do not have harmonized legislation, some Member States require submissions to regulatory authorities, while others do not. It is therefore important that sponsors are familiar with the regulatory framework of target EU Member States, and that they consult with local competent authorities and ethics committees (ECs) when justified.”

It’s sad to have to point this out, but the quote does specify “competent” authorities. And even the inclusion of “ethics committees” is not comforting seeing as how one of the leading figures in ethics study is Christine Grady, Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, and wife of Anthony Fauci – Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the president, and who is also a large spokesperson for the experimental injections.

The other takeaway from section 10 of the FDA BLA documents is the term “TERATOLOGY“.

Definition of teratology
: the study of malformations or serious deviations from the normal type in developing organisms
merriam-webster/teratology

Teratology, branch of the biological sciences dealing with the causes, development, description, and classification of congenital malformations in plants and animals and with the experimental production, in some instances, of these malformations. Congenital malformations arise from interruption in the early development of the organism. Malformations in human infants, for example, may occur because the infant’s genotype contains mutant genes or includes an abnormal number of chromosomes; they also may occur if early in pregnancy the mother has had German measles (rubella), has taken some injurious drug, or has been exposed to an injurious dosage of radiation. Experimental studies suggest similar types of factors can cause malformations in animals and plants.”
britannica/teratology

Now when you combine the terms “non-interventional” and “teratology” together, it is suggesting that the ongoing studies (that were not conducted to begin with even in a clinical trial setting, as per the FDA’s own response) on pregnant women with Comirnaty and on the developing baby, will be monitored with as little intervention as possible and is mostly to be observed for malformations/genetic defects/miscarriages/etc.

In other words, safety and efficacy were never studied in this particular group, and neither was it studied in infants. It has also not been studied for long-term analysis, as the 4-6 month trial runs proves. The current “approval” it is undergoing now is an authorized experiment on the human population that is posing incredibly unnecessary risks when considering the many effective treatments that are already available to combat respiratory illnesses. And the insistent assertiveness to push this “investigational new drug” onto babies/children who are at extremely low risk for this illness is a disastrous decision from those in an “authoritative” position and should be investigated for malfeasance and misconduct.

This is also not the first time that government agencies/health industries/etc. have conducted experiments on the public.

The Tuskegee/Syphilis experiment was initiated onto a selection of African American men between 1932-1972. The study was only stopped (allegedly) after a publication was released on Associated Press in 1972 about the immorally unethical experiments being conducted on this group:

“Of about 600 Alabama black men who originally took part in the study, 200 or so were allowed to suffer the disease and its side effects without treatment, even after penicillin was discovered as a cure for syphilis. Treatment then probably could have saved or helped many of the experiment participants, PHS officials say.”AP WAS THERE: Black men untreated in Tuskegee Syphilis Study

This study seems to echo the sentiments we see going on with the coronavirus situation, in which only one type of drug is being promoted (the COVID vaccines) while suppression of other treatments that have been proven to work (such as Ivermectin) has been denounced by the very same government/health/medical fields that have conducted these experimental studies.

A study that involved the CDC/FDA’s approval, this time on Black and Latino babies, was conducted in the early 1990’s and involved the measles vaccine:

“1990: CDC Inoculated Black and Latino Babies with an Unlicensed Measles Vaccine
A covert clinical trial by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente inoculated Black and Latino babies with an experimental measles vaccine without informing parents the vaccine was experimental. More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given the deadly “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States; a vaccine that had been tested in African and Mexican babies resulting in high death rates. The parents were never informed and they never gave their consent. The CDC harmed babies, violated federal law, and trampled on parental rights with impunity.”
1990 FDA Issued a Waiver From Consent; Covert CDC Experimental Vaccine Test on Black / Latino Babies

It’s interesting that the measles vaccine experiment identifies Kaiser Permanente specifically, because as we see in another section of the FDA BLA Approval for Comirnaty, it seems as if Kaiser Permanente makes another appearance in the role of human experimentation:

Text in the gray box below is from page 10 of the FDA BLA Approval documents
[ https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download ]

13. Study C4591014, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 BNT162b2 Vaccine
Effectiveness Study – Kaiser Permanente Southern California.”

Final Protocol Submission: March 22, 2021

Study Completion: December 31, 2022

Final Report Submission: June 30, 2023

It would seem that the approval by the FDA of these IND drugs (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine) is a way for the government/health agencies to skirt away from liability by stating that since the vaccines are no longer “experimental” by their definition, and that they are FDA “approved”, it is no longer required to gain informed consent of these drugs. In addition, as to the technicality of their terms and protocols, there are a multitude of ways to interpret their “informed consent” rules, which officials can then bend or define in any way that best reflects the use of their study/drug.

[ https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/informed-consent#exceptions ]

Also keeping in mind how long it was determined before the “health agencies” granted approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine – (4-6 months) – it would be conclusive to state that the vaccines have NOT sufficiently been studied in young children or pregnant women (or even the rest of the age groups because of the short amount of time the clinical trial study was conducted in), and the subsequent approval of this vaccine is to continue this research on the population who is exceedingly being pressured into taking this investigational new drug.

There is also the matter of the many adverse events that have been reported since the inoculation of these injections, that have largely gone unheeded within the health/medical institutions that are endorsing this drug. Other than the widely acknowledged myocarditis and pericarditis, most common in young males, which is still being studied and allowed to persist onto the public.

So again, taking into account the collusion of the government/health/medical/research fields to conduct experiments on the public, it would be necessary to reflect upon these agencies for additional breaches upon human rights, consent, and ethical behavior.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Ahmad Ardity from Pixabay

Doctors Dan Stock and Ryan Cole Share Their Expert Opinion on the Dangers of the “Vaccine” [Full Transcripts]

“This is NOT a vaccine.” / “This is a poisonous attack on our population.”

Numerous doctors and healthcare workers have been speaking out against the egregious vaccine narrative that has overrun our planet.

However, there has been a huge censorship and banning of these alternative opinions/accounts that are trying to prevent these important voices from being heard on the social media platforms or on mainstream media. Facebook, twitter, youtube, instagram… known for silencing this crucial information because it creates a form of “vaccine hesitancy”, using the pretense of a “deadly virus” as their excuse, has initiated a totalitarian stance in their push to mandate these vaccines to the whole population, and has largely banned many dissenting opinions, facts, or even basic discussion regarding the vaccines and its efficacy.

Meanwhile, the efforts to hire influencers and celebrities to endorse these vaccines have reached an outrageous precedent, and the continued effort to FUND THESE INDIVIDUALS, who are NOT EXPERTS, to speak so highly of an experimental vaccine, while DISMISSING ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS, should tell you everything you need to know about the safety of these vaccines.

I honestly wish I didn’t have to spell it out, but the dishonest tactics and malfeasance that has gone on within the government, health industries, and media/big tech collusions has reached a terrifying height, and their oppressive attempts at restricting not just rational/irrational conversations, but individuals’ OWN PERSONAL TESTIMONIES, has overstepped a dangerous boundary that looms ever closer to a dystopian society in which any form of dissenting opinion is attacked, criticized, and silenced.

Thankfully though, we continue to have several ACTUAL EXPERTS and HONEST CITIZENS coming to the forefront and offering their knowledge and experience with what they’ve seen during the COVID pandemic.

This post will cover two gentlemen: Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Dan Stock. As I have done in the past, I provide transcriptions of videos in order for people to have the ability to read the text in case that is a preferred method for them. It is also helpful in order to search for specific key words that the reader may be looking for.

Dr. Dan Stock at the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana

[All quotes by Dan Stock, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]

“Dr. Dan Stock, 5777 West 700 North, Mccordsville, Indiana.

To address your comment, geez, it’s hard to believe we’re 18 months into this and still having a problem, and I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. And that means that I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation, and everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses. They are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask, by the way. The literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we’ve presented to you has been given to the secretary.

As a matter of fact, it quotes at least 3 studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.

And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did small pox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we’re able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncitial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done.

Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health, ‘why were you doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncitial virus?’

And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective, having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that? And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called ‘antibody mediated viral enhancement’. That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in EVERY coronavirus study done in animals, on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak, and done in respiratory syncitial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which by – cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become WORSE than it would with native infection.

And that is why you’re seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you and in the emails with 6 extra, there’ll be a study showing that 75% of people who had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak, were FULLY vaccinated. [audience applauds]

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that NO vaccine, even the ones that I support and would give to myself and my children, EVER stops infection.

In 2014, there was outbreaks of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who are unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines. But a question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had NO contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual: ‘where did they get the disease?’ And the answer was, from the VACCINATED individuals.

No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do they very thing you’re wanting them to do.

And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance, and instead read the articles that are going to come in the email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counter factual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that is supposedly was gonna make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID-19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary any vaccine and restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over fifteen COVID-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D, Ivermectin, and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital. And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than 55, your risk of COVID-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination AT ALL. No reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization, and suffer 2-4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

Therefore the policies that you are basing on are totally counter factual. I don’t blame this board for that, ’cause I know you aren’t scientists and you’ve thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive.

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually if you would like to explain the science behind this, and if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free pro-bono expert testimony at your disposal. [audience applauds] I will testify in defense of this board turning down all these recommendations for free, at any time, in any court. Thank you.”

Dr. Ryan Cole, Speaking at the White Coat Summit

[All quotes by Ryan Cole, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]

“Howdy howdy. I’m Dr. Cole. It’s an honor to be here with my colleagues. Some brilliant minds as you’ve already seen. So I’m humbled to be on this stage with them. I’m excited to be here with attorneys that fight for freedom as well. And it’s fantastic to be in a room with smiling faces not covered with unnecessary cloth that does nothing. [audience applauds] So…

So who is this random doctor on stage?

I’m Dr. Ryan Cole, I’m a male clinic trained, board-certified, anatomic pathologist, clinical pathologist, dermatopathologist, way too many years at school. Also did some phD research in immunology. So immunology/virology is right up my alley. So, if you want mechanisms of action and how things work and what not, go ahead and pick my brain.

Anyway, so what about the vaccine and what about deaths? You know, Dr. Urso had alluded to that, that we have some concerns about these high numbers. What’s going on?

You know, we see the headlines, like Dr. Merritt mentioned: 13 year old, 3 days after a shot, dies. 15 year old dies of a heart attack, you know, 10 children so far in the VAERS reports, probably more now. Death after heart attacks. 39 year old mom of 3, death after the shot, etc., etc., etc. So we see the headlines.

So here’s the question. One would think in this era of a new virus and a new experimental… – I don’t even like calling it a vaccine – an investigational vaccine [audience member: “A fake vaccine!”] A fake vaccine. Okay. I can… a “clot shot”, a “needle rape”, whatever you want to call it [audience members laugh] – um, okay. So, going to the VAERS data, um… 11,000 deaths. 12,000 deaths. 45,000 deaths.

In the literature so far, about a month ago, “First Post Vaccine Autopsy”. Out of 11,000 deaths?! Are you KIDDING me? Is this science anymore? No! No, “medical technocracy”. “Fear, suffering, shot. Fear, suffering, shot. That’s all you’re supposed to have. Listen to us and that’s all you get.”

No!

So how can we do science, if we’re not looking? One cannot find that, for which they do not look. Where is the funding?

And the independent pathologists – pathology, you know, I do a lot of biopsies, cancer diagnostics, what not, we never complain about getting too much tissue. Well, when you get the autopsy you get all the tissue. But guess what? You find all the answers, too. But if we’re not looking, we’re not going to find it. And if they’re saying, “Well, don’t autopsy that. It wasn’t the vaccine. These are not the droids you’re looking for. Don’t look here.” [audience laughs]

 

So, how, how on God’s green Earth are we going to know? Where is the funding? Autopsies are expensive, yes. But if we have billions to advertise a clot shot to children that don’t need it… Dr. Fauci, where’s the funding for science? [loud applause]

Okay. When an unapproved new drug therapy vaccine is put onto the market, well you need to use the French legal system. Guilty until proven innocent. So, IF there’s an adverse reaction, IF there’s a death, it happened from that therapy, until you prove that it didn’t. And we’re doing the “Look the other way, look the other way. Follow the money.”

Who’s behind this? I don’t know. I’m not going to conspiracy theory anything. I’m not going to be political, but I’m saying if you want the data, then you need to use that French legal system, say, “This is guilty until we prove it didn’t happen from something else.” And we’re doing just the opposite right now.

Okay, what about the spike protein? We’re giving a sequence, a gene sequence, into the bodies of human beings. And the sequence goes into our deltoid and we’re informed that it has a little anchoring protein and once that is translated and makes a little protein and it’s on the surface of your cell it stays there. Well, guess what? It doesn’t. And there are studies, and of course, the “fact-checkers” are “Oh, this isn’t true. This isn’t true.” – I’m a scientist. Don’t ask the journalists, ask the scientist. Okay?

So this spike protein doesn’t stay just in the deltoid, the spike circulates in your blood, it lands in multiple organs in the body. And you know what happens? That spike protein, without the body of the virus present, we did studies in lab animals; in the lab animals, just in injecting the spike, with no body of the virus, the spike induced the same disease as COVID-19 induced. The same lung disease. The same vascular disease. The same heart disease. The same brain disease. The spike is the toxin. So again, why are we injecting something into the human body that IS the toxin? It IS the toxin. It CAUSES the disease. This isn’t a vaccine! [audience applauds]

@5:25 : Okay, so we know that the virus who everybody’s heard about, this ACE2 receptor, here’s an example. So on the left hand side, this is a – one of the cells that lines your blood vessels – I’ll show you a chart in a minute, where we have ACE2 receptors. So on the left hand side you see a kind of in the corner of that upper grid and that bottom grid, these nice smooth lines. On the right hand side, this is what the spike protein – just the spike alone, from the vaccine, is doing to the mitochondria, your cells, that’s the engine of your cells. That’s what gives you energy, the power of your cells.

Compare the left: the smooth, nice, put together; compare the right: blown apart, fragmented. That’s from the VACCINE. Not from the virus. From the vaccine.

@6:08 : Okay, so here’s the human body. You can see the plethora of sites where we have ACE2 receptors. Now think about it. I mentioned, they tell us, “Oh gosh, the spike stays in your deltoid.” It doesn’t. It circulates. In the Harvard study in 13 nurses, they showed it circulating for at least 2 weeks. A lot of people lacked something called mRNAs, an enzyme that breaks down the RNA, so it may be circulating for even longer.

Now you hear, well gosh, they died, you know, just so long after the shot. So, you know, it was 2 weeks, 3 weeks, Hank Aaron, whoever. You know what? That spike’s circulating. They tried to pull the wool over our eyes and say, “Well, it couldn’t have been the shot. We’re too far out.” Not if the toxin’s still circulating! Not if the toxin’s still circulating. The spike is the toxin. Damage to the lungs, like I mentioned.

@6:57 : On the left hand side, healthy lung tissue; nice, spaced out. See, this is what pathologists do. We look at all these cells all day long. That’s kind of fun. We’re nerds this way.

On the right hand side, see how much more purple and blue that is? That’s all inflammation. Why? ACE2 receptors in that lung. Spike binding to it, inflammatory response, immune system attacking your own body. Disease FROM the spike. Disease FROM your own “clot shot” / “investigational vaccine”. They keep lying to the American public by calling it a vaccine. They keep taking the word “investigational” off, it’s what they call it in the emergency authorization. They keep not calling it what it is. “Investigational”. An experiment on humanity. And that’s what they’re doing. And I’m showing you why. Spike is a toxin. It crosses the blood-brain barrier. Kind of like my brain cells to be where they are, and not be blown apart, right? [audience applauds]

So why in the world would we put a toxin into the human body that’s going to disrupt the blood vessels in your brain, allow the spike in there and cause inflammation? The brain fog you hear about the COVID patients? Guess what. You hear about it in the post-vaccinated damaged individuals as well.

 

“But no. Nobody’s hurt by the shot. There’s not been one death. There’s not been one injury.” That’s what they tell you. It’s a lie. And this is science.

@8:15 [slides presented]: Okay, here we go. That’s – all the blue on top, those are brain cells, all the blue doesn’t belong there. That’s inflammation from the spike.

What about the kiddos? Heart inflammation. Guess what? Blots of ACE2 receptors in the heart. And here you can see, on the left hand side, see those blue arrows around the white? That’s inflammation in the heart. That’s not normal. That’s after a shot. That’s a spike protein landing there. That’s your immune system attacking your own tissues.

See on the right, that’s the red arrows, that’s the pericardium. The sac that surrounds your heart. That’s inflammation. That doesn’t belong there.

Once you have heart damage, the heart does not heal itself.

@8:54 : Okay, left hand side, all the blue dots: inflammation. See that gray in the middle? That’s early scarring. Guess what? Once a heart cell is damaged, it’s damaged forever. It doesn’t replace itself with another heart cell. It replaces itself with a scar. So you tell me you want to give a 12 year old, a 5 year old, a 13 year old, an 18 year old, a shot? And we see about a 200 times increase in myocarditis in our society right now? “That’s a good idea, let’s give a kid a tox and ruin his heart for life.”

Stop and think about what we’re doing. Insanity. We need to stop the insanity IMMEDIATELY.

This is OVER. Game over. This is no longer good science. This is a poisonous attack on our population. And it needs to stop NOW. [audience cheers]
 

@9:51 [slides presented]: Kidney, same thing. Kidney’s are kind of important. Three things in life. Blood goes round and round, gotta breathe, gotta make pee. You don’t do those three things, you die. Kidney, you want to damage your kidney with a clot shot? Not a good idea either.

Liver? Kind of need your liver to detoxify everything in your life. Same thing. Damage to the liver. See all that blue? That’s inflammation. Doesn’t belong there.

Testes. Kind of important for the next generation, right? As much as that looks like a lovely heart, see all the blue in it? Inflammation.

Same thing in the ovaries. Here’s the problem. Essentially absent from the literature. What are they hiding from us?

Okay?

Japanese bio-distribution study, took some doing to find this study. Dr. Bridle up in Canada, of course he was attacked for telling the truth. The lipid nanoparticle that surrounds the little mRNA they’re injecting into people’s bodies; yes, a lot of it stays in the deltoid, but it circulates as well. Guess where it likes to concentrate? A really biologically active organ. The ovary.

And, in the Pfizer paperwork and application, it clearly states that in the rats there was a 16% decrease in fertility. One of the most fertile little critter mammals on the planet. And they – “These are not the droids you’re looking for. Nevermind.”

So what’s it doing to humanity? Guess what? The answer is, we don’t know. Because we don’t have long-term safety data yet. That’s the tragedy and the crime in all of this. They’re pushing it. It’s an experiment! It’s emergency authorized. It’s not approved. We don’t – humanity is the phase 3 trial.

COVID’s a clotting disease as some of my colleagues have mentioned. After a shot, we as physicians, especially if patients complaining of post-vaccine symptoms, a d-dimer will go up when we have clots. We can’t see these clots on x-ray or scan. These are micro-clots. All these inflammatory patterns that I’m showing you, are from micro-clots as well. If we look at this in the patients, we know that they’re micro-clotting.

So this is something – Dr. Noorchashm, just like Dr. Urso mentioned – patient who has already had COVID, COVID recovered, broad beautiful immunity, they’re LYING to you to say that it’s not equal to a vaccine immunity. I love the blue pan rainbow analogy Dr. Urso gave. Screen before vaccine, there’s a multiple-fold increase risk of adverse reactions if you’ve had COVID and have recovered. You get a shot, you hyper-rev that immune system – you may be screwed. And/or dead.

All right. I’m going to reiterate, one cannot find that for which they do not look. Billions of dollars spent on advertising of, again, a toxin into the human body. Investigational vaccines, again, I will say to our agencies and our federal government, where’s the funding for real science? They don’t want you to see, what we’re seeing.

In the laboratory, I have the tissues of a dead man on the back of my desk. I have two more coming next week. Guess what? Just couple days after a shot: 50 year old, healthy triathlete. One of my favorite surgeons in town that I worked with? Second shot: mountain biking, gone.

All right. The other concern I already brought up, we have no long-term safety data. This is what we need to emphasize to society, and ask the authoritative agencies: what’s the risk for cancer after the shot? We don’t know. What’s the risk for autoimmune disease? We don’t know. What’s the risk for impairing fertility for a life-time? We don’t know. So why in the world would we willy-nilly push forward at the pace and the rate that we’re going, without knowing these things? Complete anti-science. And a complete attack on us.

No more mandatory forcing of employees – how in the world are these hospitals and these employers saying, “You can’t work for me if you don’t sign up to be a subject in an experiment on humanity.” Go back to the 1947 Nuremberg Code. We’re absolutely violating this as a nation and a people.

Where are the billions to do the autopsies? Where are the billions to prove the science? Where are the autopsies? I will go back – crickets. They’re not there.

Dismissal by the collusive media, of any adverse events or death. That’s a problem. And what happened to the concept of the “#metoo movement”? Believe everybody? What happened to “believe her”? Believe the story. What happened to “believe anyone”? Why won’t they believe the science? They won’t believe the science, they dismiss the science. What happened to this movement of “believe it until you can disprove it”? Gone. Gone.

All right. Couple side by side notes, really critically, and I’m almost out of time, what we’re seeing in the laboratory is the shots dysregulate your immune response. We have very important cells that keep other viruses in check. They keep cancers in check. There’s a type of cell called a CD8 killer t-cell. Well there’s a study out of Germany and the Netherlands that showed a shifted immune profile. And at the end, their conclusion was, we see a concerning pattern of the cells we normally need, to fight off these other things.

But the answer is, we don’t know for how long that shifted pattern lasts. It’s like having 8 blockers on the frontline – this is Texas, we talk football – having 8 blockers on the frontline and paralyzing 3 or 4 of them. But the answer is, we don’t know if they’re paralyzed for the rest of the game or the rest of their career.

And then what we see from this, in the laboratory is an uptick of herpes family viruses. Molluscum, human papillomavirus, all sorts of viruses. Mononucleosis, etc., reactivating. Reactivating at levels, and I’m a pathologist, so we see this in the laboratory and I’m seeing the early signal. Well guess what else that CD8 cell does? And some receptors on some of these t-cells called toll-like receptors, and there’s a certain pattern of them. They keep cancer in check. I have seen a 10 to 20 fold increase of uterine cancer in the last 6 months in my laboratory. And I keep data, year to year to year. In the last 6 months, when did we start the shots? January.

How much solid tumor cancer increase are we going to see over the next several years? Probably a lot. What’s the real answer? We don’t know, and sometimes that’s the most honest answer in medicine, is we don’t know.

A doctor that tells you he or she knows everything, don’t believe them. Find a new doctor.

Increase in latent viruses, etc., etc…

So anyway, I know I’m out of time for questions, thank you so much, and God bless.”

A huge thank you to these doctors and everyone else who has been speaking out against these affronts to our health, rights and freedom. These concerned, caring individuals are pointing out the corruption of the COVID/vaccine narrative, and we as a whole NEED TO LISTEN and REFUSE these unnecessary vaccines and lockdown/passport measures.

It is not about our health – as HONEST doctors/scientists/virologists/nurses, etc. around the world are exposing. If it were about our health, then proper studies and research grounded on facts would be offered, and transparency that people are suffering from an unparalleled amount of tragic side effects and death and the acknowledgement that these vaccine efforts should be STOPPED.

Instead, what we are getting are straight up LIES and COVERUPS, and an incessant push to get everyone vaccinated while disregarding the science and the dangers that these injections are imposing on the world. We are always told to “trust the science” – but “not THAT science”. Not the science that contradicts the official narrative. “Trust the scientists.” – “But not THOSE scientists.”

We need to be able to discern who has our best interest at heart – and one thing is certain: it is NOT the CDC, NIH, WHO, UN, NIAID, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WEF, paid off institutions/influencers/celebrities/politicians or anyone else who continues to endorse these vaccines.

Please stay informed, and stay safe.

Featured image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay