Walensky and Fauci Fumble in Their Responses to the Senate Committee, with Rand Paul’s Call for Fauci to Resign – But is the Senate Culpable as Well?

Rand to Fauci: “You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

This post is not meant to convey whether or not there is an existence of a “deadly virus” or not. But it is to point out the suspicious nature of experiments that the NIH has funded/endorsed in regards to gain-of-function research, and also to show the indirect and dishonest responses from two individuals who have been spear-heading the shady “coronavirus/vaccine” situation.

The spotlight is on CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and NIH/NIAID Infectious Disease “expert” Anthony Fauci.

Now, I want to first preface by saying that I am withholding judgement on the legitimacy of Senate hearings to begin with. While I would love to believe that there are indeed good politicians in high places that can make real change in ousting corruption in big establishments, many are speculating that psyops have been put in place to prolong certain narratives while keeping people’s hopes alive that something will be done about it. And of course we can’t ignore the possibility that even if there are those who are trying to make a real positive change, they may be set against a huge criminal organization who will stop at nothing in order to drive their own agenda forward.

Case in point: Walensky, the FDA, Pfizer, etc. have already gone ahead with their atrocious approval of these dangerous COVID “vaccines” on children, in which this agenda should never have gone on so far to begin with since there is ample evidence that the vaccines have nothing to do with our health and are definitely NOT “safe and effective”.

So to continue witnessing this farce without arrests being made casts a dubious look into the justice system as it is. Not only do Fauci, Bourla, Gelman, Daszak, Walensky, Gates, their agencies, as well as complicit governmental bodies, including Joe Biden, etc. have immense crimes to answer for, but the whole legal/legislative systems seems to be right behind them if this is allowed to continue further.

(This is, of course, under the assumptions that the whole of the legal/legislative structure isn’t already completely corrupted/broken to begin with…)

With that being said, I would still like to point out the following two Senators that are at least calling out Walensky and Fauci for their complicity in keeping this ruse going. Senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy certainly seem as if they are trying to get to the bottom of these narratives. But could they be merely actors on a stage? Keeping us happily engaged in believing that the “good guys” are making progress? Or are they genuinely one of the few brave souls standing up to deceit and subterfuge?

I will say this: while Anthony Fauci is a known liar, how good is his acting? He certainly looks shaken up as Rand Paul questions him…

Senator Rand Paul@58:24: “Fauci, I don’t expect you today to admit that you approved of NIH funding for gain-of-function research at Wuhan. But your repeated denials have worn thin and the majority of Americans, frankly, don’t believe you.

Even the NIH now admits that EcoHealth Alliance did perform experiments in Wuhan that created viruses not found in nature that actually did gain in lethality.

The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations. You can deny it all you want, but even the Chinese authors of the paper, in their paper, admit that viruses not found in nature were created, and yes they gained in infectivity.

Your persistent denials though are not simply a stain on your reputation, but are clear and present danger to the country, and to the world. As Professor Kevin Esvelt of MIT has written, “Gain of function research looks like a gamble that civilization can’t afford to risk.” And yet here we are again, with you steadfast in your denials. Why does it matter? Because gain-of-function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature, could cause a pandemic even worse the next time.

We’re suffering today from one that has a mortality of approximately 1%, they’re experimenting with viruses that have mortalities of between 15 and 50%. Yes, our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.

Experiments that combine unknown viruses with known pandemic causing viruses are incredibly risky. Experiments that combine unknown viruses with coronaviruses that have as much as 50% mortality could endanger civilization as we know it.

And here you sit. Unwilling to accept any responsibility for the current pandemic, and unwilling to take any steps to prevent gain-of-function research from possibly unleashing an even more deadly virus.

You mislead the public by saying that the published viruses could not be COVID. Well exactly no one is alleging that. No one is alleging that the published viruses by the Chinese are COVID. What we are saying is that this was risky type of research; gain-of-function research. It was risky to share this with the Chinese, and that COVID may have been created from a not yet revealed virus. We don’t anticipate the Chinese are going to reveal the virus if it came from their lab.

You know that, but you continue to mislead. You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic.

Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?”

Anthony Fauci: “Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you’ve said.

Gain – first of all, gain-of-function is a very nebulous term. We have spent, not us, but outside bodies, a considerable amount of effort to give a more precise definition to the type of research that is of concern that might lead to a dangerous situation.

You are aware of that. That is called P3CO.”

Senator Rand Paul: “We’re aware that you deleted “gain-of-function” from the NIH website.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I can get back to that a moment, if we have time. But let’s get back to the operating framework and guide rails of which we operate under. And you have ignored them. The guidelines are very very clear, that you have to be dealing with a pathogen that clearly is shown and very likely to be highly transmissible in an uncontrollable way in humans and to have a high degree of morbidity and mortality, and that you do experiments to enhance that. Hence the word EPPP: Enhanced Pathogens of Potential Pandemic.”

Senator Rand Paul: “So when EcoHealth Alliance took the virus SHC-014 and combined it with WIV-1 and caused a recombinant virus that doesn’t exist in nature, and it made mice sicker, mice that had humanized cells, you’re saying that that’s not gain-of-function research?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the framework and guidelines of – “

Senator Rand Paul: “So what you’re doing is defining away gain-of-function. You’re simply saying it doesn’t exist because you changed the definition on the NIH website. This is terrible and you’re – you’re completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab.

There’s – the preponderance of evidence now points towards this coming from the lab, and what you’ve done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically. That’s what you’ve done. You’ve changed the website to try to have a new definition that doesn’t include the risky research that’s going on.

Until you admit that it’s risky, we’re not going to get anywhere. You have to admit that this research was risky. The NIH has now rebuked them. Your own agency has rebuked them.

But the thing is, you’re still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say that they became sicker. They gained in lethality; it’s a new virus. That’s not gain-of-function?”

Anthony Fauci: “According to the definition that is currently operable… you know – Senator, let’s make it clear for the people who are listening.

The current definition was done over a 2-3 year period by outside bodies, including the NSABB, two conferences by the National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, on December 2014, March 2016. We commissioned external risk benefit assessment, and then on January of 2017, the office of science and technology policy of the White House issued the current policy.

I have not changed any definition.”

Senator Rand Paul: “And coincidentally, coincidentally the definition appeared on the same day the NIH said that, yes, there was a gain of function in Wuhan, the same day the definition appeared – the new definition, to try to define a way what’s going on in Wuhan.

Until you accept it, until you accept responsibility, we’re not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won’t admit that it’s dangerous, and for that lack of judgement, I think it’s time that you resign.”

Chairman Murray: “Thank you Senator Paul. And I would like, um, to give the time to Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Yeah, well, there were so many things that are egregious misrepresentation here, uh, Madame Chair, that I don’t think I’d be able to refute all of them, but just a couple of them, for the listens to here for – 

You has said that I’m unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. The current pandemic. Okay?

Number two, you said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that’s a lab leak; I believe most card-carrying viral phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you, that is much more likely, even though we leave open all possibilities, it’s much more likely that this was a natural occurrence.

Third, you say we continue – “

Senator Rand Paul: “We’ve tested 80,000 animals and no animals have been found with COVID.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, the time is for Dr. Fauci to respond.”

Anthony Fauci: “And third, you made a statement just a moment ago that’s completely incorrect. Where you say we continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Senator Rand Paul: “You approved it in August of last year…”

Anthony Fauci: “No no, your statements say, quote, I wrote it down as you were writing, “You continue to support research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – “

Senator Rand Paul: “Your committee a month ago says you still trust the Chinese scientist and you still support the research over there. You said it a month ago in the committee.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, I have allowed Dr. Fauci to respond. You’ve had your time and I’m going to give him one more minute.”

Senator Rand Paul: “If he’s going to be dishonest he ought to be challenged.”

Chairman Murray: “Senator Paul, we will allow Dr. Fauci to respond after you’ve given accusations like that. Dr. Fauci.”

Anthony Fauci: “Well I don’t have any more to say except to say that as usual, and I’ve – I have a great deal of respect for this body of the Senate and it makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.”

Senator Rand Paul: “History will figure that out on its own.”

While Rand Paul seems to be on the right side of history, the complete negligence and willful ignorance on the part of the Senate committee as a whole to not continuously address the many, MANY adverse events of the COVID vaccines which have harmed MILLIONS of people, according to VAERS, and who instead continue to humor the narrative that the vaccine is the end all be all, is, quite frankly, ludicrous and criminal in and of itself. While they may allude to the information about the adverse events, no steps have been taken to fully investigate and analyze the hundreds of thousands of ACTUAL DATA provided.

There is enough substantial evidence declaring that the COVID vaccines are NOT safe nor effective, yet the ruse continues to go on.

Not to mention the push now to mass vaccinate millions of children, who were never at high risk from “COVID” to begin with… it is obvious that the vaccine effort should have been halted A LONG TIME AGO.

Keep in mind that it is common knowledge that the adverse events are under-reported by a factor of only 1-10% being reported for non-serious side effects, and a speculative estimation of 10-50% being reported for serious events.

There is also the suspicious account of the FDA presentation that flashed for a brief split-second showing a list of the “possible” side effects from the COVID vaccines to be on the lookout for:

Screenshot from: [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XTiL9rUpkg ] U.S. Food and Drug Administration@2:33:40

So to continue to ignore these facts and people’s plights from the devastating effects of the vaccines and prolonging this “pandemic” and the vaccine narrative is either complete obliviousness, to put it nicely, or downright complicity.

Again, this is not to speak of everyone in the Senate individually (unless it is in fact true…), but to point out the incredibly inane decisions of those ultimately in charge of these committees and giving their final verdict which has enabled these atrocious crimes against humanity to continue.

It is my opinion that a call for Anthony Fauci to resign does not do the damage that he has caused throughout the years (including his organizations: NIH/NIAID) justice, but instead efforts to make arrests of those initiating these crimes should be pursued as well.

Moving on to the second portion (from the same hearing), we see Rochelle Walensky responding to Senator Bill Cassidy’s inquiries to address natural immunity versus vaccine-induced immunity, and also her refusal to answer uncertainty in how many CDC employees are vaccinated.

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Dr. Walensky, couple things: as I walked in, I came in late, one of you – either you or Dr. Fauci – were saying that the reason that we’re not saying that natural immunity is protective as is a vaccine, even though there’s recent publication showing that 6-8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect, and indeed B cell continues to climb, that we don’t have data.

Now in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs [electronic health records]. And I’ve been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data, as to who test positive. So I do that as a prologue.

If we don’t know that natural immunity confers protection against future infection, is because we’ve decided not to look. Because I’ve learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected, we’ve got the bench research showing that the triad of antibodies, T cells and B cells are there, and that 92% of them are still there at 6 months out, so why don’t we – why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yeah, thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point, because I understand, I understand the question.

Um, first of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers in the scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who’s been previously infected should be vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that’s not my question.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Right, agreed. So, so – and part of the challenge here is as you know the infection induced immunity and the biases associated with retrospectively looking at the data. Several of those papers that we reviewed for that brief have demonstrated that the kind of disease that you had at the time you had it matters.

Um, did you have disease a year and a half ago? Did you have – were you an older person? Were you – ?”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “May I stop you for a second?

We could do this prospectively, because you know who is actually, apparently I’m told, you’ve got patient identifiable data, and you would be able to say, okay, 6 months ago we’re going to start everybody infected within the last 6 months, and be able to follow their EHR, prospectively, to see this.

I mean, theoretically, CDC has the ability to do this right now.”

Rochelle Walensky: “Yet that too would have its own biases. So one of the things that we have demonstrated in the scientific brief is that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people, who might not present to their providers, might present to an urgent care clinic who might not be recorded in their own EHR, likely have less robust protection than those who’ve been severely affected.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But that could be established prospectively if using the data that you have. And you could even say, if you had symptomatic infection, you don’t need to be vaccinated, we would consider you immune, you don’t have to be subjected to the mandate, but – “

Rochelle Walensky: “If we had data – if we had data that demonstrated a correlation of protection, Dr. Fauci already mentioned data that they’re working on to look at correlates of protection, not just in antibodies, but as you noted in T cell function as well. So if we were able to document a correlate of protection we absolutely could prospectively follow – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “But this paper that I’m reading from NIH, speaks that there is durable memory of the virus up to 8 months after infection in 95% of the people who recovered, including B cells, which continue to climb, and T cells and antibodies.

And I’m also saying you could do it clinically, because we have data that’s patient identifiable, that we could go back and look and see if they were exposed. They could be in a hot spot like Louisiana, where you know they’re being exposed, and then you would see. Not just by lab data, but empirically.

I can tell you, the American people intuitively understand this, and they feel a little bit like we’re being willfully blind to it.

I have limited time, let me just ask you something else. What percent of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’re actively encouraging vaccination in all of our employees and doing a lot of education and outreach in order to get our agency fully vaccinated.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “And the – but the percent?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have that for you today.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “I’m told that 75… some north of 75% of CDC employees at headquarters are still working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Um, we are following regulations through HHS and the federal government.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “No, that’s not my question. I apologize to be rude, but – but I’m asking a very straightforward question.

I’ve been told that north of 75% of employees at CDC headquarters are working remotely. Is that correct?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t actually know the number off the top of my head. So I’d have to – “

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you look down the hallway, are there empty desks? Are over 50% of the desk empty?”

Rochelle Walensky: “Senator, I don’t have the numbers off the top of my head. What I will tell you is that we’re working closely within HHS and the administration to follow the governmental rules for return to the workplace.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “There was a recent GAO report that shows, it was released in the last 2 weeks, that there’s been no coordinated response in the federal government to get people back into work.

Now if there’s any agency that – since we have teachers in Fulton county are back at work, that the caseload of COVID in Fulton county is about 88, at its peak it was 606, if what I’ve been told by someone who frankly kind of knows, that people in laboratories are not showing up, I have no clue how people, how laboratory workers who presumably are vaccinated, wearing PPE, would consider themselves eligible to stay at home.

I say this because, I just want to echo – we’ve got to lead by example in the federal government. If our public health agencies don’t have enough confidence in the immunization and the PPE to go back to work, fighting infectious diseases, there’s going to be a lot of undermining of a willingness to further fund public health.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We absolutely have our central labs back at work, conducting their essential research towards this response, and um, we are following the regulations and providing technical assistance and technical support to the federal government for return to work policies.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Uh, one more thing, I had – Angus King and I had sent a letter dated February the 25th, asking about genomic surveillance. We’ve still not received a response. You reference it in your earlier remarks. Both Senator King and I would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “We’ll get back to you. Thank you very much.”

I can sum up Walensky’s testimony in 5 short dialogues; paraphrasing, of course:

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Do you have data showing that natural immunity may offer better protection than vaccine immunity; and if not, then why?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

(By the way, I want to interject here by saying that Senator Bill Cassidy is absolutely correct when he posits that the reason that they “don’t have the data” is because they deliberately did not look for it. I also want to add the shady practice of the pharmaceutical companies breaking protocol and completely getting rid of the control group after only a few weeks into the COVID vaccine trial…)

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “What percentage of CDC employees are vaccinated?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “Are around 75% of CDC employees still working remotely from home?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy: “When you go into the CDC headquarters, how much percentage of desks have no workers there?”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time.”

Bill Cassidy: “Senator King and I asked you about “genomic sequence” back in February but have not received a response yet. We would appreciate a response.”

Rochelle Walensky: “I don’t have data on that at this time… but we’ll get back to you.”

This is the Director of the CDC, ladies and gentlemen. This is who is in charge of an organization that we are supposed to entrust our lives to in order to help get us through a “deadly pandemic”.

When she cannot say, in all honesty, that 100% of her CDC employees – who presumably have complete trust in the vaccines that she kept reiterating is the most important thing needed for our health – is fully vaccinated, while at the same time preaching that young children most definitely should get it, is EXTREMELY suspect and I am amazed at the continual indulgence of these hearings to not call out this hypocrisy for what it is. (Save for a small handful of Senators, that is.)

But at least we know that Rochelle Walensky hasn’t lied about how many of her employees have been vaccinated… yet.

Lastly, during the committee hearing, there were other Senators posing additional queries as to the questionable responses and suspicious nature of those testifying and their habits of skirting away from certain questions, which I want to mention here as well.

Senators Marshall, Burr and Moran (of the additional 3 testimonies that I watched, there may have been more with similar interests) have also raised legitimate concerns over the vaccines, mandates and debates about natural immunity versus vaccine efficacy – and was also met with a jumble of non-answers mixed with endless endorsements of the COVID vaccines.

Honestly, if I, an average American citizen, can see through their facade, then surely well-educated and seemingly experienced individuals in detecting deceit and malpractice would be able to determine the illegitimacy of these corrupt establishments and their cohorts as well.

So again I have to wonder at the incredibly unnecessary perpetuation of these fraudulent activities, instead of finally taking appropriate steps to shut down this criminal conspiracy.

To those Senators and other researchers who are genuinely seeking the truth and attempting to uncover the treasons, misconduct, and egregious scandal that has corrupted our governmental body and health/medical industries, my sincere gratitude and respect to you for standing strong and having enough integrity to stand up against these depravities.

God bless.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Edward Lich from Pixabay

Stew Peters Show Interview with Former Pfizer Employee | Poisonous Graphene Oxide is 100% in the Vaccines

DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID ‘Vaccine’ [Full Transcript]

I made this post: Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines detailing a few quotes/excerpts/studies that have purportedly shown that graphene oxide is indeed in the COVID vaccines. One source of information was from Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and scientific data/clinical analyst.

While I highlighted some of the pertinent information from her interview focusing on graphene oxide in the above link, I also wanted to offer the whole transcript since she goes into further descriptions of her findings and the harm that graphene oxide can do to the human body.

The below video of the interview between Karen Kingston and the Stew Peters Show has been transcribed in full, with some emphasis added.

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.

On twitter, you may have recently been following the hashtag ‘pfizerleak’ [#pfizerleak]. We want to know what’s in them. We want to know if it was pre-planned. Who’s behind all of it. We want to know what to believe, so today we’re going to get the confirmation that we need.

It’s hard to fact-check documents. It’s hard to fact-check publicly discoverable propriotary ingredients. It’s hard to fact-check Karen Kingston. She is a former Pfizer employee, currently an analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.

Karen, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate your bravery. We admire your desire to expose the truth behind what appears to be, to me at least, one of the most, if not THE most, evil agenda mankind has ever been subject to.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

SP: “Is graphene oxide in these shots?”
KK: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?”

Karen Kingston: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.”

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston: “I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Yeah, and the other reason is because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel, which is the liquid, you know, AI template that’s used for some of Elon Musk’s, you know, research and Bill Gates, as far as that creating an interface between humans and, you know, the internet, if you will.”

Stew Peters: “So there is a legitimate theory that these shots are actually designed to create some sort of connectivity between humans, 5G – whatever this is, controlling your thoughts, your memories, all of these things, I mean, those are realistic and plausible possibilities?”

Theory: Humans as guinea pigs | Injecting people with as much graphene oxide as possible before they die

Karen Kingston @4:56: “That’s not possible with this round. They rushed this thing out. They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.”

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston: “Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.

So if you take a look at chemical and engineering news, there is these non peer-reviewed journals, we call them RAGS in the industry, every industry has it. And it’s basically, you know, the whales of the industry, the who’s who, and they just kind of brag about what they’re doing. So this article talks about the PEGylated lipid nanoparticles that are in all the COVID-19 vaccines. And there’s 4 lipids. And I’ll go over this.

So the first lipid is cholesterol, and that’s, our body loves cholesterol, it makes it go through the blood. Then there’s a phospholipid; the phospholipid adheres to the cell membrane, so that allows permeability to enter the cell membrane. There’s an ionizable lipid, so that gives it a positive ionic charge to help penetrate the mRNA to get into the cell. And then there’s the PEGylated lipid.

And so the reason why they created these is because mRNA is very unstable. Whether it’s synthetic or zoonic, which means it’s from an animal, you know, or a human. It’s very unstable. 80 degree weather kills it. Sunlight kills it. If you breathe on it, it dies. I mean, and researchers all say this. It’s just – it rarely gets past the nasopharynx area of any healthy individual. It just – you know, your saliva kills it. It cannot survive on its own, so it needed this kind of biosphere that they created for it. And that’s why we have these four lipids and then they put the graphene oxide.

Now what’s interesting about the graphene oxide is that it’s 4,000 times stronger than titanium, and can withstand seventeen hundred degree fahrenheit temperature. So we took this very unstable virus, single helix virus, and we made it indestructible. Or “we”… they made it indestructible. So the PEGylated lipids, if you take a look, it’s ‘peg’: PEG, they’re made by a company called SINOPEG, which is [SINOPEG], and they’re located in China.

Now, how did I find this out? Well if you take a look at the Pfizer EUA filing, they list the 4 lipids – they have 2 lipids, each of which have 4 lipids of them in there, and so does Moderna. And Moderna’s is called – it’s called a Material Safety Data Sheet, this is what they use in industrial products. And it has a cast number, and there’s is SM102 for Moderna; and then if you go to Pfizer’s filing with the UK, the number – the 2 lipids that are in there, are called ALC0315 and ALC0159.

So when I googled MSDS cast, don’t ask how I know all this information, and I put in some of those numbers, I found SINOPEG. I didn’t find SINOPEG by googling SINOPEG. I literally put in the MSDS number. And so if you go to the website, you’ll see the, you know, extremely long, like I don’t know, hundred alpha-numeric name of each of these lipids. And you’ll see it under a tab called COVID-19 Excipients. And it says ‘polyethylene glycol PEG 2000’, right? And then here you’ll see it’s ALC0159, and this company is located in China. And then if you pull from the patent, from the Moderna patent, it lists out all the different polyethylene glycol 200, PEG 200, PEG 2,000, and you will find those listed under the COVID-19 Excipients in SINOPEG.

So… it’s right there. It’s manufactured in China. And so, there’s other vaccines that are mRNA vaccines that are not being sold in the United States. You can find those excipients here too, by the cast number, the Material Safety Data Sheet cast number.

Graphene oxide as a conductor of electricity | “positive charge annihilates anything that it comes in contact with”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’. So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized.

You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Stew Peters: “So it’s apparent to me that they’re lying, to the world. (Karen Kingston: “Yeah.”) They’re trying to hide this; this is the secret ingredient.

Lead Stories, USA Today, and all these other publications fact-checking this program, it appears to me that they are out and out lying. We’re going to get to who’s in on all of this in a minute, because I’m going to ask you, but, why are they using this graphene oxide? It’s a toxic substance, it’s poisonous. Why would – why are they using it?”

Karen Kingston: “Because it’s a great conductor of electricity and it can host magnetic field. So it can literally – it can connect you to the internet. That’s why.”

Stew Peters: “All right. I just wanted to make sure that I was clear on that. Because I know that you’re not comfortable opining opinions, things like that, but I just wanted to make sure factually that that’s what it can do, that’s what it’s capable of doing.”

Karen Kingston: “Yeah, and I mean, I haven’t had the chance, but I could probably go into some tech publications and AI publications, and we can find more information on how graphene oxide is a great electromagnetic – “

Graphene oxide is poisonous/toxic – Who’s responsible for it being in the vaccines?

Stew Peters @11:24: “Well the bottom line is that it’s poisonous. It’s poisonous (Karen Kingston: “It is poisonous.”) – it annihilates if it has a positive charge; it annihilates anything that it comes into contact with. It’s toxic for humans, it should not be in there and it is. That is what I needed to know. Who’s behind this? That’s what I’d like to know. Who’s behind all of this?”

Karen Kingston: “Well, I don’t… so, hold on, I didn’t put this in here but, there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Stew Peters: “So you knowing this, you bringing this confirmation, why would the – I guess, I mean this is opinion, so you can just tell me if you’re not comfortable answering this, but I gotta ask, why would people like President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Sean Hannity, what do they have in – what stake in the game do they have? How do they not know this stuff? They have – I mean…”

Attempts to expose these vaccines as bioweapons are silenced/censored

Karen Kingston @13:05: “No, there’s no way they can know this stuff. I want to be…[long pause], when I – sorry, when I found out, when I read this information, I didn’t know a woman could cry as hard as I cried.

So I sent an email out on May 26th, to about 30 outlets with this information; I sent an email summarizing that these are bioweapons. I even spoke to – and I don’t mean to be disparaging to anybody, I even spoke to American Frontline Doctors and stuff and after I spoke to them, you know, some of the doctors still went on saying, “Oh, as long as you’re – if you’re under 30 you shouldn’t get the vaccine.” And I called them up and I’m like, “What the hell are you doing? These are bioweapons.” They’re like, “We can’t say that.

So the cognitive dissonance of the depravity and the evil of these “vacc” – injections, is very difficult for anyone to understand. And you have to also understand that for the whole year and a half these were being developed, anyone that came out and said, “Hey, this virus isn’t that bad”, they were mocked, they were ridiculed, they were ostracized, doctors were threatened to have their license taken away. So the truth couldn’t get out there. And then when people, anyone that was questioning about the speed for any of these vaccines to market, the need for them, even the FDA documents, they talk about “Hey, we don’t think someone under 18 should get these things. We’re worried about viral shedding.” If you show this like here – the manufacturing section of the application is redacted!

No one in good conscience should have approved this. But there is such brainwashing going on, such control of what basically the big tech wanted us to know as “the truth”, which was a bunch of lies, that it’s very difficult then for when someone says to you, “this is what’s going on”, to believe it.

I would compare it to anyone that’s been in a marriage where they had a spouse that was cheating on them. Your friends can tell you they’re cheating, there’s tons of evidence, but you are not going to believe it. You’re not going to believe all your trusted – all your trusted advisors have been telling you this stuff is safe, everything on the media says it’s safe, and then someone says “No. It’s actually lethal, and this is a planned, you know, planned genocide.” It’s impossible to believe.

Stew Peters: “Wow.”

Karen Kingston: “Does that make sense?”

Questioning people’s complicity with these agendas

Stew Peters @15:25: “Yeah, and, you know, I’m just, I’m having a hard time. I mean, honestly, I mean, I’m a human. You know. And so just knowing people that have subjected themselves to this inoculation; knowing how hard, how difficult it is to have a conversation with somebody, doing what I do, downloading to my brain, terabytes of information, every single day. Trying to determine what’s real, what’s not, what’s mis- and what’s dis-information? Who’s deepstate, who’s trying to throw me off, who’s controlled opposition?

You know, I mean it really – it happens. It sounds like some kind of a sci-fi movie, but you’re living in it, so you understand. I’m just trying to process all of this as you’re saying it. And I’m imagining, you know, people in the media. You know, I’m imagining, you know, people that they don’t understand that there are billions of lives at stake, or maybe they do, which makes it even worse. Because they’re complicit in this. They’re part of this – the carrying on of this.

And then, I think about everybody who’s going to be mandated; these shots. Um, listen, I’ve – Karen, I got an email this morning. I got an email this morning from a very concerned mother, of a young woman, who is going to be attending a Christian college in South Carolina. And they’re going to mandate this thing for her. 18 year old young woman with her entire life ahead of her. And she’s just one of millions of stories like this that are happening here in this country. What we’re doing to our young people. Poisoning them.

And so, then you got healthcare workers. I mean, I have a dozen emails in the last 48 hours from nurses, healthcare workers, doctors, people who are working at these facilities, in these clinics at these hospitals that are going to be mandated this. They don’t want to do it, they need help! And, you know, the DOJ is telling everybody that they can do this. The governors can mandate this, that businesses can mandate this. And so…”

“There’s no benefit to your health when you get injected;
the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill.”

Karen Kingston @17:15: “Well, the DOJ – just because someone says something, especially in this current administration, doesn’t make it true. Okay? The DOJ can say, “We recommend this is mandated. We’re saying that this is  – we mandate these vaccines.” But I, you know, it’s a memo, I read the memo, okay? It’s a memo that was written by Dawn Johnsen. She’s the acting assistant attorney general to the president, saying that, under title code 21, section 564, you can – private companies and local governments can mandate the vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization.

Her interpretation is reckless, and it has no merit. So it’s just an opinion. It is not enforceable. Period. You know. And on top of that, what’s happened with these vaccines, or these injections, these EUA injections, not only is all the campaign and the propaganda a bunch of lies to terrify people into getting injected, which is a violation of human rights in and of itself, on top of that, she doesn’t mention title code 21 in her memo, which is what this falls under, because they violated 4 other sections of that title code under drug safety: drug and vaccine safety.

They have, under section 502, it’s false and misleading labeling, because this thing is NOT a vaccine, there’s no benefit to your health when you get injected; the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill. So there’s false and misleading labeling. It doesn’t tell you that it contains graphene oxide. Adulterated drugs and devices, it also violates section 501, which again, adulterated drugs and devices is if it includes a toxin, which is the graphene oxide.

It also violates section 312.23 under initial new drug application. So if you go through an IND, you have to prove safety in animals before you move on to humans. They signed a letter of intent for pregnant rats. If that doesn’t make you furious, and we’re injecting pregnant women? And under the IND it says that if there is shedding, if there is risk to people of child-bearing age, then you need to stop the trial.

We KNOW there is shedding. We KNOW there is risk to child-bearing age. And the FDA even talks about it in their protein therapy and oncolytic virus that treatments that shedding is a real thing and you need to do animal studies first, then you need to do phase 1 human studies, and if there is, you know, if there is shedding, then you need to come up with controlled measures so that you don’t infect the uninjected. Which is what’s going on right now. They also violate section 312.42, which is clinical research holds and request for modifications. So that says if any of these things, I said, there’s at least 3 dozen, you need to stop the trials.”

Difference between trials of the past, and the COVID injections

Stew Peters @20:08: “Trials have been stopped when 25 people die; when 6 beagle dogs die.” 

Karen Kingston: “They were supposed to have stopped the trials when they did the mice study, and all the mice – 80% died in 24 hours, and the rest died by the end of the week.  […] They should’ve stopped the trials – “

Stew Peters: “But there is no threshold here. Is there? I mean – that’s the bottom line. There is no threshold. It doesn’t matter how many people die, they will continue this incessant push, won’t they?”

Karen Kingston: “Until American people speak up, and say ‘Enough is enough. Stop it!’ They will keep pushing us until, you know, they basically wipe out America. And they’re going after the children. Which is what is so disheartening. There is a – there will be no posterity. There will be no America. You know, if people of child-bearing age become infertile, and then children are at most risk for having serious adverse events and death from these injections. I mean, just look at the myocarditis numbers. They’re 1 to 25,000 reported, we know that’s at least 10%, which would be 1 in 2500, and it’s probably more like 1 in 250, which would be 4% of children are getting – having decades taken off their life or dying.

Stew Peters: “I am up against a hard break. And I have to go. Will you come back on this program? Because, we are dedicated to the truth. You are a wealth of information, and I’ve got so many more questions that I would like to continue this conversation with you. Will you promise to come back? I mean, are you comfortable with doing that?”

Karen Kingston: “Oh yeah! No, I’d love to be on. If I’m not comfortable answering your question I’ll just say that I’m not comfortable answering the question. I’m okay with saying that.”

Stew Peters: “Yeah, because I mean I have so many more, and I know that there’s going to be pouring out of questions on my social media and my DMs and my protonmail, ‘please ask her this’. And so I just want to reserve the future opportunity to have that conversation with you.”

Karen Kingston: “Absolutely. And I sent you a lot of the documents from the FDA website and the patent office and – “

Stew Peters: “We’re going to post all of those at stewpeters.tv. Karen Kingston, thank you so much.”

Karen Kingston: “Put it all up there. And, I do, I drafted letters to healthcare associations, and I’ve just been so busy, but obviously after talking to you I will finish those letters today, so that people can send them to their employer and they can send them to their school, they can send them to healthcare providers saying that, you know, I have the right to informed consent. I’m not saying it’s going to stop them from getting fired. But what will happen is eventually justice will prevail and our constitution always prevails, and you will have evidence that they can’t, they can’t plausibly deny that they didn’t know this information.” 

Stew Peters: “I believe that to be a 100% true, and I appreciate your optimism because that is what I’m trying to hold on to here as well. Unbelievable.

Thank you so much for being here. Really appreciate it.

The Stew Peters Show continues in 60 seconds. Go nowhere.”

Stew Peters @22:51: “You know what this is, right? Number 2 pencil? Everybody’s got one. Everybody’s got – everybody remembers filling out tests-  we should all be filling out our ballots with these number 2 pencils. That’s what we should be doing. But you know what’s in the tip of every number 2 pencil, right?

Lead! Put it on paper, it turns into graphene; that’s graphite, right? Lead! They want to inject you with lead. Lead is poisonous. Graphene oxide is poisonous. Graphite is poisonous. This is – they want to inject your children with lead!

‘Oh, but it’s just a little bit, Stew. It’s just a little bit. Don’t worry about it. Just a little – just a tiny little bit of lead.’

Remember when they wanted to inject the world with just a little tiny bit of mercury? It’s not going to – the point is, it’s not going to stop, unless you stop it. I stop it. Unless WE stop it. And you can. No matter what weight, no matter what muscle they come at you with; the federal government – blablabla, propaganda this –

No! They cannot mandate this. Mandates are NOT legal, not at work, not at school, nowhere! They are not legal; they cannot force you to inject yourself or your children with this poison! Please! Share that video everywhere. We have once again been vindicated.

So USA Today, Lead Stories, Politico, all these other people you – if you google Stew Peters and click on news, you’ll see right now, “No graphene oxide!” We showed it in the segment. What are they going to do? Redact? Retract? Correct? I don’t think so. Say ‘NO’. Do not allow them to do this to you or your kids.”

[outro promotion for CBD @24:21]

Really appreciate the Stew Peters Show and Karen Kingston for informing us and reporting about the composition of these vaccines and the possible agendas that are in place.

They, as well as others speaking up, show great integrity and bravery in exposing these egregious narratives and spreading awareness so that people can make their own educated decisions and be discerning to the corruption and lies that surround us due to government/big tech/mainstream media/”health” & pharma industries’ collusions to keep the truth hidden.

And a big thank you to everyone for reading and being/becoming informed. If you have already taken the COVID vaccine, please read up on some resources that may be able to help reduce the toxicity of the injection from your system.

How to Neutralize Potential Damage from mRNA Vaccines (I take no liability or responsibility for the remedies listed at this link. It is just one source of information that may be beneficial in reducing vaccine harm. Please research further and get in touch with HONEST doctors to find the best treatment for you. Anyone who is blindly “trusting the science/the experts” and endorsing the COVID vaccines is NOT HONEST; and if they are honest, then they are honestly misinformed/deceived.)

Featured image by nts01 from Pixabay

Doctors/Whistleblower: LARGE Amounts of Graphene Oxide Found in Certain COVID Vaccines

Proof with patents/documents and lab results shows that graphene oxide is in the vaccine.

Researching this subject of course brings up several “fact-checking” websites set on debunking this claim; however, as educated individuals have found out, these fact-checking websites serve one main purpose – and that is to perpetuate only one side of the narrative, even if they’re WRONG.

So instead of me attempting to fact-check the fact-checkers or debunk the doctors/scientists – which I know I can’t do since I am not adept in their fields, my sole purpose in this post is to point out what these doctors/scientists ARE saying and let people decide for themselves what may be the truth.

Of course, the truth is the truth and nothing can change that, but with so much misinformation and misleading content running rampant in today’s world, it’s crucial to scrutinize all of the information and discern the truth from the lies.

The following quotes/transcripts offered here allege to have found a substantially dangerous amount of graphene oxide in several different vaccines. And some speculation as to why these same companies are insisting that just one shot, two shots, booster shots, etc., may not be enough.

(…Again, I’m not a scientist. But what would multiple doses of large graphene oxide amounts do in the human body, especially if it is administered several times per year?… Another haunting question, why have there been graphene oxide found in masks and test swabs as well?)

Graphene Oxide in Jabs, Masks and Swabs

La Quinta Columna discovers large amount of graphene oxide in the vaccination

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / La Quinta Columna: ‘98% to 99% of the vaccination vial is graphene oxide’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Ricardo Delgado @3:43: “Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?”

José Javier Esparza: “The entire COVID disease. And then you, who already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.”

Ricardo Delgado @5:51: ” – because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of 500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha, etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada. You all know that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed. So, what we have to ask ourselves is: if the masks were removed because they caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced into the vial? Moreover, in a considerable amount.

What we have found there, according to what the university that has done this study says, is that the main component is precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something else, but above all it is graphene oxide. And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide.”

Ricardo Delgado @7:36: “It seems that the body has a certain capacity to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain immunological mechanisms. Once inside the body it acts as if it were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione. So that is why, we probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a third dose. Now intranasally. They are already talking about new intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more potent.”

Ricardo Delgado @11:53: “98% to 99% of the vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of the vaccine is graphene oxide.”

Former Pfizer employee CONFIRMS La Quinta Columna’s findings of graphene oxide in the vaccines

(Some excerpts with corresponding timestamps and embellishment added for emphasis):

Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison!, was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.

USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.

We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.”

Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together.

I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyze intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research. And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”

Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?

Karen Kingston:100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.

So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.

So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.

Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”

Karen Kingston:I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.

Karen Kingston @4:58:They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.

Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “

Karen Kingston:Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.”

Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.

So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized. You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”

Karen Kingston @11:47: ” – there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines. It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.” 

Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team finds graphene oxide in the vaccines

There is also further confirmation of Ricardo Delgado’s findings from Dr. Andreas Kalcker’s team, showing similar research results and investigations of graphene oxide in the vaccines.

The following excerpts (timestamps were added for the time of the subtitles) were taken from orwell.city / Andreas Kalcker’s team confirms evidence of graphene oxide in ‘vaccines’ Please visit their site for a full transcript and video of the interview.

Dr. Isignares @00:12: “For example, there is an issue that concerns us a lot because we had already detected certain things in the vaccines. And that’s that these vaccines contain graphene oxide. It’s been verified by electronic microscopy by someone from our team. The question is: why is there graphene?”

Dr. Andreas Kalcker: “To make it crystal clear. What varies is the biological composition of the vaccines. What doesn’t change in any of them, and that’s in all of them, are the crystals that are present in different amounts. They’re present in all the vials. There is both the magnetite, which has a Chinese patent, by the way. It’s patented. You can see… It’s not magnetite. It’s graphene.

Dr. Andreas Kalcker @1:51: “What happens then? The body needs its electromolecular capabilities to work. The heart beats because there’s a magnetic field that creates, subsequently, the electricity for pumping and everything else. And, therefore, what graphene is doing is that it’s completely altering our electromagnetic field. Something that has never happened before. And, let’s say, what we’re seeing is something ‘in vivo’ with some dramatic effects.

To understand more, we have also been watching a lot of videos of people who are dying after being vaccinated. There’re others where you see people spasming. These spasms have, for example, very specific frequencies, and they are, basically the same in all kinds of spasms. These spasms, clearly indicate that there is a disruption of the human electromagnetic fields.”

Research and studies proving that graphene oxide is being attempted to use in vaccines

It’s almost humorous that all of these fact-checking websites are refusing to acknowledge that there might be large amounts of graphene oxide in these vaccines, although the doctors/scientists above have allegedly found evidence that it does, and there are also some published studies that might suggest that graphene oxide will be used in vaccines as well. (please let me know if any of the links are no longer working)

An article on pubmed published the following research in 2016:
Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

“Our work not only presents a novel, highly effective GO-based vaccine nano-adjuvant, but also highlights the critical roles of surface chemistry for the rational design of nano-adjuvants.”

Another article on pubmed published this research in 2018:
Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Immune System Biomarkers Produced by RAW 264.7 and Human Whole Blood Cell Cultures

“These applications include batteries, super capacitors, drug delivery and biosensing. However, few studies have investigated the effects of these nanoparticles on the immune system.”


The current study shows that GONPs modulate immune system biomarkers and that these may pose a health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle.”

And yet another article from pubmed published in 2020:
Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant

“Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.”

“Keywords: Adjuvant delivery; Antigen delivery; Functionalized-GO; Immune adjuvant; Vaccine adjuvant; Vaccine nano-carrier.”

There is also this study showing how graphene oxide can inhibit certain responses, such as anxiety, fear, etc. (which, just theorizing, may perhaps take away someone’s natural instinct to perceive danger or threats…) when injected into certain parts of the brain. (Which also begs the question… what happens when this material gets injected into other parts of the brain…)

Soothing the symptoms of anxiety with graphene oxide

Of course the title of the link downplays the implications that this graphene oxide can cause – which seems to be a manipulative tactic that people employ to try and convince others of the benefits of a potentially dangerous substance and/or decision. And while on the surface drugs and medicines may have advantageous effects, we can’t overlook the possibility that others may use the same drugs and medicines/procedures/gene therapy, etc. and twist it to fit their own purposes.

From the same link:

“Serge Picaud, Deputy Leader of the Graphene Flagship’s Biomedical Technologies Work Package, comments: “This work provides another great demonstration of the therapeutic potential of graphene, used either alone or included in a medical device.”

Now I propose a theory of my own: In the near future, the same fact-checking writers/articles that were “debunking” all of the ‘graphene oxide in vaccines research’ will state something to the effect of: “Even though there is graphene oxide in the vaccines, there’s no reason for alarm” and/or “The graphene oxide material found in vaccines are not large enough to cause harm”, etc., etc., until the headlines change once again to state, “Why too much graphene oxide in your system is detrimental to your health” and “Further booster shots will not contain graphene oxide due to its dangers”.

Only time will tell…

Thank you to the Stew Peters Show and all those exposing this egregious corruption.
And a special thank you to Orwell City for translating and transcribing the videos with Ricardo Delgado and Andreas Kalcker & team.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by seagul from Pixabay

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”