Which One Are You?: A Follower? Or a Leader? | The Answer May Shock You

No pun intended.

During these uncertain times, especially amidst the corona/vaccine agendas, it has become increasingly clear that there are, sadly, a great percentage of conformed followers than there are questioning leaders.

I’d like to highlight the following social experiments to demonstrate this. Now unless these experiments were staged, because I can’t rule that out, but I am going under the assumption that it has not, and that these are legitimate.

Similar experiments like these have been conducted in the past as well, with varying results. However, just from these modern time experiments, it is worrying the lengths that conformity will go to in order to just be one of the pack, and not be considered an “outlier”. We can see it in abundance today, that humanity hasn’t changed much in their line of thinking. If anything, we have become even more docile, even more compliant, even more unquestioning of even the most inane decisions as long as it comes from a position of “authority”.

The below experiments show the need that people have to follow the group, even if it doesn’t make sense, and/or even if it’s wrong. While the first couple of experiments shown do not involve the welfare of others, the third example most certainly does, and the results are terrifying.

Do you know where you’d stand? Are you being completely honest with yourself? Take a deep, long look at what’s going on in the world; how desperate some people are to fit in, to not be considered a “conspiracy theorist”, or a “right-wing nut” that doesn’t agree with the “majority of the population”… or a dumb imbecile that doesn’t even listen to experts/authority…

Would you be okay going against the grain even though EVERYONE ELSE around you is following a certain narrative?

EXPERIMENT 1. Social Conformity

This first experiment shows a lady who, though there is no reason for doing so, other than everybody else was doing it, conforms to a practice of standing up when a buzzer goes off, then sitting back down after a second or two. There is LITERALLY no reason to do this, but slowly but surely, even those who were not hired actors who initiated this social conditioning from the start, became conformed to following the original test subject.

What would you have done?

It’s easy to say that we wouldn’t participate without being in the same situation as them, but would we, or wouldn’t we? Can we admit when we may just well follow along with the pack for the sake of not being ostracized or be the odd one out? Or would we be strong enough in our own resolution to not follow along with silly mandates, even though everyone else around is?

Experiment 2. Herd Mentality

The below video shows a modern day example of the Asch experiment in progress. The Asch experiment wanted to see how many people would be influenced in giving the wrong answer, simply because everyone else gave the wrong answer. In this line up, 10 people are given the task of choosing which line matches the singular line shown on a separate stand. The first 9 people are all in on the scam to choose the wrong answer, leaving the 10th person, the actual test subject, to decide their answer. Will they trust their instinct and choose the right answer, even if they’re the ONLY ONE to choose it?

Or will they follow along with the crowd?

Herd mentality and peer pressure are very real social dilemmas that affect people in our day to day lives. While some people did not conform to the rest of the group, indicating that there are some willing to follow their intuition and not follow the crowd, even at the risk of ostracization or looking silly, we also can’t overlook the fact that some people may already know about the Asch experiment, and realize that it is a social test; thus skewering the results.

As it is, being different and the only one to choose a different answer, can seem isolating; but if one has confidence in themselves, and doesn’t care what other people think, especially when they’re sure the other people are wrong, can we see real leadership – and perhaps make us second guess our initial reaction/response.

Now, while the first two examples had nothing to do with anything serious, what if the matter literally comes to life and death? What if we are coerced, say… by an authority figure, to carrying out an act that does significant harm to another human being?

Think people will be any less obedient/conforming?

Take a look at the Milgram experiment, which was conducted in the 1960’s to test people’s obedience to authority figures.

Experiment 3. “Listen to the Authorities”

This video is highly disturbing, because it shows the lengths that people will go to simply in the name of listening to an authority figure; even if they’re against it, even if they want nothing more to do with a particular action, if they are commanded by someone in a presumed position of authority, they will continue to commit life-threatening harm on another being.

Source: youtube | Brian Burak | Milgrim Experiment [Milgram]

The gentleman who has the unfortunate task of “punishing” the learner is clearly distraught over the commands to keep inflicting shocks to the other participant. However, at the continued prompting of the experimenter, ends up going all the way to the end of the shock board – even after the learner ceases to respond.

It’s important to note that he is not FORCED to keep pressing the switch. He could refuse – in fact, does so on numerous occasions, yet at the insisting prods of the experimenter, concedes, albeit begrudgingly, and continues to press the switches.

It’s clear that he cares about the other person at the end of the shocks, yet because this authority figure tells him to continue – to inflict terrible pain even to the point of no response – he finishes the task until the experimenter tells him to stop.

The following short interview between the gentleman and the experimenter(s) happens next:

Experimenter: “How do you feel, by the way?”

Subject: “I feel all right, but I don’t like what’s happened to that fellow in there. He’s been hollering – we had to keep giving him shocks – I didn’t like that one bit. I mean, he wanted to get out, and you just kept going, kept throwing 450 volts. I didn’t like that. He wouldn’t even look in on that gentleman.”

Experimenter 2: “But who’s actually pushing the switch?”

Subject: “I was. But he kept insisting. I told him no, but he said it got to keep going. I told him it’s time we stopped when we got up to 195, 210 volts.”

Experimenter 2: “But why didn’t you just stop?”

Subject: “He wouldn’t let me! I wanted to stop.”

Think the test would have been any different if a cute, little puppy was involved? …Well, you’d be wrong.

In an incredibly inhumane experiment, the same experiment was conducted, but this time using a puppy, with real shocks. I obviously DO NOT CONDONE the following test, but wanted to mention it here for further reference to people’s compliance to authority figures:

(And I usually don’t condone cussing on this site, but in some cases it’s warranted and drives the point home rather succinctly)

Charles Sheridan and Richard King took this experiment one step further, but asked subjects to shock a puppy for every incorrect action it made. Unlike Milgram’s experiment, this shock was real. Exactly 20 out of 26 subjects went to the highest voltage.

Almost 80 percent. Think about that when you’re walking around the mall: Eight out of ten of those people you see would torture the shit out of a puppy if a dude in a lab coat asked them to.

Words at the end of the above video from Stanley Milgram that should be immortalized:

“The results, as I observe them in the laboratory, are disturbing. They raised the possibility that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authority.

A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do irrespective of the content of the act and without limitations of conscience. So long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.

If in this study, an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a 50 year old man and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests, one can only wonder what government, with its vastly greater authority and prestige, can command of its subjects.

I believe we are all under a social experiment of some kind, by design. The corrupt world leaders are sitting back, watching people follow in line of the most ridiculous and dangerous mandates; laughing at how many actually follow and enforce these rules, while at the same time seeing just how far they can go before people start realizing that it is all a farce.

Then when you consider exactly how much of an influence that social media presents on our life, and the excessive amount of bots programmed to give the users the illusion that a vast amount of the population thinks a certain way, including collusions with the mainstream media – one can see how easily the public could be swayed into a “groupthink” mentality.

So how far can humanity be pushed to following a narrative, a guideline, a rule, if seemingly “everybody” else does it too, and especially when those in a “position of authority” command it?

This is the question that is being asked. And chillingly, a large portion of people would rather follow the herd mentality, than be a brave individual that goes against the status quo. Even if one’s own moral conscience is on the line.

I think it’s high time for all of us, as an individual, to really take a step back and gauge our own actions (and inactions, for that matter). Can we develop our own fortitude, our own strong constitution, to do what’s right – even if “the majority” or “authority figures” demand we do otherwise? What is “right”, for that matter? 

Our moral compass is being tampered with. We need to fine-tune it, and get back on track. Regardless of peer pressure or authoritative control. And we need to be brave enough to stand apart from the herd, and help lead the pack away from this destructive nature.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Crystal Clear Learning

Youtube To Get Rid of Dislike Button – As an “Experiment”

More media manipulation.

If it wasn’t obvious before how much youtube manipulates viewers’ opinions, maybe this will finally shed some light on the matter.

Not only do we have facebook, who has admitted outright that it was experimenting on its users:

Facebook manipulated users’ moods in secret experiment

(Keep in mind, this experiment was allegedly done in 2012, with word coming out in 2014 about the results. Imagine what they have been doing since then…)

but we also have other big tech conglomerates engaging in mass experimentation with its users in order to steer public opinion.

Youtube to hide the dislike count is only one of them.

I made this post: Youtube Trigger Words, a couple of weeks ago, and it explains how there are certain suspicious words that will initiate an information panel to “guide” the viewers to additional information (that supposedly come from a third party – but that youtube obviously recommends. Again – in order to manipulate viewers’ opinions…)

And these words are of a highly controversial, and conspiratorial nature. It brings to mind why youtube would go to such measures to implement this system on such a small amount of very specific trigger words. Could they be working with organizations that are attempting to “debunk” certain theories and speculations? …You be the judge. (And then the question becomes ‘why’? If these subjects and theories are so ridiculous and outlandish, why spend so much time and effort into ‘debunking’ these topics? It seems as if more and more people are starting to believe it, and it damages certain organizations’ reputations and credibility. That would be a very good reason to target and manipulate people who aren’t onboard with the official narrative.)

And now, with the experiment of removing the dislike count (oh, but don’t worry. You can still press the “dislike” button, according to the youtube spokesperson, but you just can’t see it. Only the creators of the video can see the results.) it is only another agenda in order to sway public opinion. And/or a way to suppress people’s opinions. And it is unclear at this moment, if the “like” results will be hidden as well. If not, then obviously only the LIKE results will be shown, while the DISLIKE results will be seen with NO dislikes. But it couldn’t possibly be an effort to skew the public’s opinion on what’s good content and what’s not… right?

Let’s take the speculation of the current US presidency results, for example.

Youtube has already been caught removing some of the dislikes from The White House channel. These screenshots were taken from reclaimthenet.org: YouTube scrubs thousands of dislikes from Joe Biden videos on official White House channel where you can see many more examples.

Let’s say that youtube is initiating this “experiment” because of the incredible amounts of dislikes that The White House youtube channel has been receiving due to the 2020 presidency.

Is it a targeted dislike campaign, like youtube is suggesting? Or is it simply people expressing their sincere dislike of being fooled and manipulated into believing that Joe Biden actually won the presidency fair and square? And even if he did win the election fairly, people are allowed to express their disappointment of the current president’s handling, are they not? And if they disagree with the president’s statements, then they are allowed to have their own opinions and thoughts on the matter, are they not?

Or is everyone expected to just fall in line with what many see as an egregious over-step on the voters’ rights and who most suspect of election fraud? (…Which, by the way, “U.S. Elections” just so happens to be a “trigger word” on youtube that initiates an information bar on certain videos.)

And what gives youtube the right to alter the like/dislike algorithm to begin with? Sure, it’s their platform, but then they can’t say that they’re not attempting a deliberately targeting “like campaign” to counter the “dislike campaign”. Or to even apply to any video they want. Again, just like with facebook’s experimentation on their users, it might just boil down to manipulating and steering people’s moods, opinions, and thought patterns. Which is exactly the goal.

I do want to make this clear, I am not for Trump or Biden. I think most politicians are corrupt. But taking away the people’s voice – because not only is youtube taking away the dislike counter on some videos “as an experiment”, but there is of course the option to disable comments as well. Even though each content creator has their own option to do so, to disable comments on a widely used platform geared to present important information to the public by the government, but then take away the public’s ability to express their own opinions and disagreements, is completely against the democracy that the government was supposedly built upon. (And they call themselves democrats?)

We are not living in a democratic society. Or even a republican one. Everything that you are witnessing is the result of an ARISTOCRACY – and we have most likely been living in one for most of our lives.

And for other controversial circumstances that could have added to youtube’s decision to remove the DISLIKE counter, is the entire coronavirus situation and the debate surrounding the efficacy of the vaccine and mask mandates (along with other several different issues), and the general disagreement to the Klaus Schwab, World Economics Forum’s “great reset” proposal.

Both of these topics have been heavily opposed with many people expressing their distrust and suspicions regarding these institutions.

Of course with so many shady practices and everyone in each other’s back pockets,

YouTube CEO Says They’ll Censor Content Not In Line With World Health Org
The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are launching an emergency coronavirus task force of 200 business leaders — including execs from Alphabet and KPMG
A timeline of the great reset agenda: from foundation to Event 201 and the pandemic of 2020

these big industries are obviously trying to protect each other, and what better way to do this than to silence dissent and make it appear as if no one is against these agendas?

As we can see from just these three links, we have youtube partnering with WHO, which youtube’s own CEO Susan Wojcicki has explicity stated that “anything that would go against World Health Organization [WHO] recommendations would be a violation of our policy” and would therefore be classified as “misinformation”.

And then from there, we can see a whole camaraderie between the biggest establishments running the current covid situation at the moment.

The WHO, partnering with not only youtube but also the WEF, who has partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who have partnered with Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, and so on and so forth. All of which are highly involved in pushing this vaccine mandate/”new normal”/great reset dictatorship scheme, and trying to get everyone to follow along.

This is no accident, and no mere coincidence. Everything has a purpose and a meaning.

Because George Carlin said it best (rest his soul) and it is still very relevant, here is a transcript of part of his infamous Big Club speech (emphasis added – and strong language ahead) :

“The real owners, the big, wealthy business interests control things and make all the important decisions – forget the politicians – the politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice.

You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls – they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear.

They got you by the balls! They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying to get what they want!

Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want.

They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests.

That’s right.

They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting f***ed by a system that threw them overboard thirty f***ing years ago. They don’t want that.

You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly sh**tier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours to reduce benefits, the end of overtime, the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your f***ing retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later, ’cause they own this f***ing place.

It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it!

You and I, are not in the “big club”.

By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe – all day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. (both literally, and figuratively…)

The table is tilted, folks.The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice, and nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people – white-collor, blue-collar, doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on – good, honest, hard-working people continue – these are people of modest means – continue to elect these rich c**k-s**kers who don’t give a f*** about them. They don’t give a f*** about you. They don’t give a f*** about you! They don’t care about you, at all! At all! At all!

…(small excerpt taken out due to content)…

The owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American dream… because you have to be asleep to believe it.” – George Carlin

The key point to all of this is to be self-aware. Think critically, think for yourself, and stop letting all of these corrupt agencies/big tech media corporations think for us.

Like what you like, not because of what other people say or how the supposed majority thinks and feels, but because you are confident enough in yourself to know who you are and what your own individual personal likes and dislikes are. As long as it’s not hurting anyone, you should feel complete within your own self to not care what other people think and instead stick to the truth of what you like and your own opinions, and not so easily cave into societal pressure or demand.

This is the goal of big tech and businesses. They push their agenda on the population to get as many people on board as they possibly can, and if that doesn’t work, then they skewer and manipulate the public opinion to coerce others either through fake popularity, and through bots and shills – which are a very real media manipulation tactic.

Maybe we can better learn to support and socialize with one another in real life and still be able to expose injustices and ridiculous propaganda, since these companies are deadset in taking away our capability to do this online. And help each other to learn to build our awareness in order to realize when we’re ultimately being taken for a ride.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay (with some slight alterations).

Get an Earful

Are “COVID Variants” Named After 5G Towers/Networks? | Delta, Kappa, Lambda, Mu… - The theories of "COVID" and 5G being connected rages on.
Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports? - "COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus"
Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.

Are We In The Matrix?

And are NPCs real?

Our minds and thoughts are a topic that I have a vested interest in, as you can see by several posts I’ve made addressing this very subject:

Mind Control and Dissociation
Did You Know?: There are some people that don’t have an inner dialogue.
Are You in Control of Your Thoughts?

And the repeated mention of others that touch on the idea of NPC’s (non-playable characters) being an actual, real life phenomena in our daily lives is something that I’d like to bring up.

Is this a ridiculous concept?

I have to be honest. Sometimes I wonder at the seemingly inability of some people to think “critically”, or even to think at all.

Morpheus: “The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system, is our enemy.

When you’re inside, you look around, what do you see?

Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy.

You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

Are you listening to me, Neo? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?”

Neo: “I was – “

Morpheus: “Look again.”

Neo: (looks behind him to come face to face with a gun pointing at his head)

Morpheus: “Freeze it.”

Neo: “This, this isn’t the Matrix?”

Morpheus: “No. It’s another training program designed to teach you one thing.

If you are not one of us, you are one of them.”

Neo: “What are they?”

Morpheus: “Sentient programs. They can move in and out of any software still hardwired to their system. That means that anyone we haven’t unplugged is potentially an agent.

Inside the Matrix, they are everyone, and they are no one.

When I researched the inner monologue and inner thoughts, and the realization that some people truly did not have this capability, at all, but instead seemed to “file away” their information, it made me deduce that all of the knowledge that they have was given to them, and they don’t necessarily have the comprehension skills to logically reason through the data and come up with their own conclusion. They only accept it, without question, because it comes from an “expert” or an “authority figure”. Their inability to constructively go through the information and determine the truth of it is marred by, perhaps, their inherent different neurological make-up and the lack of an inner voice to help guide them into filtering facts from fiction.

Now obviously I’m not implying that everyone without an inner dialogue think the same way, or specifically think this way. But it was a correlation made between this and some of the interviews I’ve seen with people who claim that they don’t have an inner dialogue. Could there be some basis of truth to it?

All throughout our life, most of us are taught to “trust the news”, “trust our teachers”, “trust our parents”, “trust the police”, “trust the doctors”, “trust the government”, “trust the experts“, etc., etc., etc. The supposition is that most of us are so deeply wrapped in the “worldly system” that whatever the simulated majority says and thinks, people will go along with it because we (and especially the NPCs) quite literally need to be told what to do and how to think.

And if we are being told “facts” by those in a trusted position (I don’t think that exists anymore…), people are more inclined to believe these so-called experts, than a complete stranger who is calling these experts out for their errors. And don’t even get me started on the smear campaigns that the corrupt system indulges in if there is an actual expert (or anyone else for that matter) that is saying something against their narrative…

If there is someone with a thought that deviates from this system, there is automatic resistance to that person and/or idea because it is threatening their way of life.

And I have to be very clear. Some of these are very bright and intelligent people. They have incredible book knowledge and seem very informed on a wide variety of subjects. They’re smart. Coherent.

But that’s the thing. If the information they are getting from whatever source they are using is WRONG, they won’t be able to discern from this false information since it’s “common sense” to trust what’s in our history books, our teachers, our scientists, etc. The concept that the educational system, or psychologists, or news media and so on, can do no wrong is so deeply ingrained in them and they will refuse to think otherwise. Some will simply deny the truth out of fear – they DON’T WANT TO SEE IT. And anyone who can see through the lies and the deception will automatically be labeled as a “conspiracy theorist” and/or a paranoid delusional that needs help.

Now, imagine if there is an infiltration coup happening to invade every aspect of our lives. Let’s say, just for example, by a secret, corrupt organization – or society, if you will. This group will stop at nothing to put their own people at the top, even going so far as to murder and cover-up their agenda. Could these people successfully infiltrate our news media, our churches, our government, our education system, etc.?

Former Luciferian (Satanic) Cult Member Exposes the Dark Illuminati Agenda
How the Illuminati (Luciferian Satanists) Infiltrated Religion, Secret Socities & Government and Hijacked Them from Within

What do you think the answer is? Does this sound inconceivable and too complicated to ever be pulled off? What if this same group of people were indoctrinated since infancy to participate in this kind of hostile-takeover? What if these groups of people expand far further than most people realize and since they have no qualms about killing off their competitors, they would receive very little push back from the companies they are trying to take over?

And if there are NPC’s in our world, this take-over would be quite simple, really, since NPC’s won’t question their new over-lords leaders.

Are we surrounded by Agent Smiths? And/or bodies capable of hosting Agent Smiths?

Source: youtube | Bloomberg Politics

A secret service agent appears to give commands to Hillary Clinton at a campaign after Hillary stalls for a moment while staring at an unseen person or object off screen. Several other agents then surround Hillary, either in an effort to protect her, or, perhaps, to control her and/or the situation around them. Meanwhile, the first agent repeats his command to her to “keep talking”.

And are there people that have been unplugged, but are desperate to go back into the system, even at the cost of other people’s lives?

Please check out the tragic tale of Erin Valenti. Shortly before she died, she called her parents in a panic and stated the following cryptic message,

It’s all a game, it’s a thought experiment, we’re in the Matrix.

Erin Valenti was a CEO for Tinker Ventures (strangely, there is not much activity on the Twitter page and the last tweet was made on August 23, 2019) as well as other startup initiatives, and was also involved in other companies that research and experiment with mind control and brainwave interfaces and DNA/genetic sequencing  – such as CTRL-labs and Summit Partners/IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies). Not to mention her connection with Silicon Valley and the tech networking/industries, which are a whole questionable and suspicious circumstance in and of itself.

There was also the controversial seminar (Ontocore / Create Powerful) she attended that many suspect is a kind of indoctrination camp or maybe even some type of cult initiation. Of course, this could be way off base and an actual legitimate course to help those in executive positions, although only those directly involved and who have participated would know for sure. (If they have the eyes and ears to see and hear it for what it is…)

She was also an advocate for the fight against human trafficking, which, as anyone in the circle of theorists know, is a huge warning sign that something corrupt is in the midst.

To learn more about this devastating case, please visit:
“We’re in the Matrix” Tech CEO’s Cryptic Last Words | blameitonjorge
Are Thomas Reardon’s Experiments on ‘Brain Wave Interfaces’ Connected to Erin Valenti’s Death?

What is Ontocore?


Source: Reddit

Source: Facebook

I don’t know about you, but their phrase: “LESS HUMAN, MORE BEING” is really telling… then top that off with their obsession to being “committed” (they used the word 8 times in 6 sentences…) to doing “what is necessary”, not to mention their lovely snake eye-like logo… and I can see where the speculations of this group being a cult are stemming from.

The efforts of certain individuals and organizations (Facebook, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, DARPA, CTRL-labs, etc., etc., etc.) to control our minds aside, (which may be creating NPCs as we speak…) there is also the debate of the spiritual side indicating that some people are just born without a conscience and therefore an actual NPC in their own right.

The four percent of us who have no conscience
Spiritless Humans

So what is the reality when we’re surrounded by seemingly sentient beings? Are they really? Or is it true that there are some in our population who are literally just here as a means to test the “living souls” to see how far we are in our spiritual development? Is that why it seems as if some people are just too deeply indoctrinated and stuck in the “Matrix” and are an actual part of this system? Are the people who are waking up starting to come to the same realization? That perhaps members of their own family, friends, co-workers, etc. are there to test our growth and aptitude? Is that why the world seems like it’s in a perpetual state of chaos? To see if we choose to join the worldly system, or eventually open our eyes to this deception and expand our consciousness to fully realize our actual nature?

Is this a dangerous ideology and only presents more problems and division? “Living souls” vs. “soulless lives“? Or could there be some truth to this theory?

Obviously, no matter if “NPCs” are real or not, the only way to truly win in life is to not look down on anyone with disdain or condescension, no matter what your belief is. It is to treat each other with love and compassion, and be understanding that we’re all learning at our own pace. Some may get unplugged from the Matrix sooner than others, and some may not be unplugged at all. But we are all on our journey, and the best thing we can do is set our own example of being loving and caring individuals.

If it is true that we are indeed wrestling “not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” (Ephesians 6:12), then it is even more crucial to be able to detect this “spiritual wickedness”, and stand strong in our own resolution and resist falling into this corrupt system.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured Image by ParallelVision from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Are “COVID Variants” Named After 5G Towers/Networks? | Delta, Kappa, Lambda, Mu… - The theories of "COVID" and 5G being connected rages on.
Are These Findings the Death Blow for Vaccine Passports? - "COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus"
Egregious Medical Tyranny Holds Patient Hostage in a Hospital and Refuses Her Preferred Medical Treatment – Patient DIES Under Their Protocol - Veronica Wolski was denied specific treatment - AND denied the freedom to leave the hospital.
More LIES and CONtradictions About COVID and the Vaccines | How Does Anyone Still Believe the Narrative? - We have been lied to numerous times by top officials. When will the rest of the world wake up?
W.H.O. / Governments Working in Collusion with Big Pharma? | A Necessary Look Back at the Swine Flu Pandemic - STEPPING BACK IN TIME: Another attempt to vaccinate the whole world.
Jerm Warfare Interview with Dr. Zelenko: “These “vaccines”, which I call ‘poison death shots’ “ - "The only reason you'd vaccinate your child is if you believe in child sacrifice."
Scandal Behind the FDA “Fake Approval” of Pfizer Jab - Corruption and collusions behind the Pfizer/FDA "vaccine" efforts.