Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials?

What is Christine Grady’s role in the vaccine agenda?

One name that’s been front and center of the whole “coronavirus pandemic” is Anthony Fauci. I think we can all safely say that his is now a household name whose popularity exploded within the last year, year and a half.

Being appointed as the head of the coronavirus task force and the director of NIAID (U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and a physician at NIH (National Institutes of Health), not to mention the chief medical advisor to numerous presidents throughout the years, it would seem as if our current situation rests squarely on his shoulders, as well as the collaborations he has with other organizations – CDC, FDA, WHO, UN, Silicon Valley, WEF, Wuhan lab, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and so on.

However, one name who is also closely tied with Anthony Fauci and the unprecedented initiative to get the whole world vaccinated – is his wife, Christine Grady, whose name rarely comes up in the mainstream media.

Who is Christine Grady?

According to the following website:

Hm… already, I’m not liking the sounds of it.

“Human Subjects Research” … “bioethics” … “research subject recruitment, incentives, vulnerability”…

Kind of reminds me of what’s going on right now with the huge demand to vaccinate as many people as possible. We also have “incentives” to get the vaccine – travel, lotto, beer, donuts, concerts, cigarettes, etc., etc., etc. “Vulnerability”… well, there are task forces (Operation Homebound, for example) literally created for the sole purpose of aiming for the elderly and the mentally handicapped to get vaccinated, and now we are seeing huge efforts to get children vaccinated, even without the parent’s consent, and with the children being bribed with ice cream.

Very vulnerable groups, indeed.

Now one has to ask themselves, wouldn’t Christine Grady‘s position within the medical community as the Chief of the Department of Bioethics, as well as her role for obtaining human subjects for research, be in direct conflict with Anthony Fauci’s role as presidential and coronavirus advisor to administer a NEW vaccine that is only “authorized” – not approved – for emergency use only?

Keep in mind, the only reason why these vaccines are even authorized for emergency use to begin with is the belief that we are in an emergency situation, which, as anyone who has done proper research should know, the covid numbers have been drastically and fraudulently heightened to give the public the illusion that we are in a dangerous pandemic.

There are numerous reports coming out from esteemed doctors/physicians/scientists/lawyers, etc. who are willing to testify in court that the numbers of death from covid have been exaggerated, largely by abusing the PCR tests and labeling as many deaths as possible as covid – with the medical industry ALSO being incentivized with financial compensation to label them as covid – not to mention bribing families with free funeral services ONLY IF the death is labeled covid… (I think you can see where this is going) and that the vaccines themselves are an experimental trial initiated onto the public without their knowledge or consent.

Video: “Crimes Against Humanity”: The German Corona Investigation. “The PCR Pandemic”

Video: “All Roads Lead to the Vaccine”: Full Interview with Dr. Peter McCullough /
Renowned Texas Professor and Doctor: COVID-19 Shots Are “Bioweapons Thrust Upon the Public!”

Full video with Peter McCullough:

A short excerpt on Dr. Peter McCullough’s view on this strange situation with the vaccine propaganda:

Dr. Peter McCullough is one of the leading experts on COVID-19 treatments. He was the lead author of a study, published in the American Journal of Medicine last August, which has been cited over 600 times making him the most cited doctor by the National Library of Medicine regarding treatments.

McCullough has actually treated patients successful with medications that have long been approved to treat other viruses and diseases. The problem is, how can the government and corporations profit off drugs they don’t hold patents for? That’s why, according [to] McCullough, the propaganda of a vaccine being the savior has been pushed from the very start of the COVID-19 tyranny.

“So, the U.S. government has made a decision, along with the stakeholders – the CDC, NIH [National Institutes of Health], FDA, Big Pharma, World Health Organization, Gates Foundation – they have made a commitment to mass vaccination as the solution to the COVID pandemic and we are really going to be witness to what’s going to happen in history,” McCullough said in an interview. “We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong.”

More and More Doctors Warning Against COVID Shots

Now, I want to bring your attention to the term “bioweapon” that Dr. McCullough mentions in his video. And the interesting correlation to the profession of “bioethic research” that Christine Grady is engaged in.

Merely a coincidence?

Combined with the DIRECT RELATION to Anthony Fauci, and his influence and “guidance” on the vaccination efforts, whose involvement with the Wuhan lab and now the controversy surrounding the gain-of-function research to deliberately create this virus – possibly as a means to justify enforcing the vaccine on the population – I’d say the conjecture of this being “just a coincidence” would only be to satiate those in extreme denial and refusal to admit that these corrupt medical industries have anything nefarious planned.

But with everything coming to light now, perhaps the public will finally realize what a sham the pharmaceutical company has been (or has become), and how there are organizations aiming for agendas that, while incredibly hard to believe, are unfortunately the only conclusion one can come to when honestly studying these groups and the plans that have been in the making for decades.

The REAL Purpose of the Covid Vaccine
The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun?

While everyone is focused on Gates and Fauci, and even Klaus Schwab for his “great reset” agenda, including the strangely similar “build back better” proposal, Christine Grady may, in fact, have more to do with these agendas than we’re led to believe. And perhaps is one of the key players in the driving force between dispensing these gene-therapy, mRNA vaccines onto the population.

Take into consideration the following ethically immoral case study of the Willowbrook experiment, that was conducted on innocent, mentally handicapped children from 1956 to the early 1970’s:

Nina became one of more than 50 mentally disabled children, ages 5 to 10, under the care of Dr. Saul Krugman, a respected pediatrician from New York who wanted to determine if there were multiple strains of hepatitis, and whether a vaccine could be created to protect against the disease. Krugman and his partner, Dr. Joan Giles, used the Willowbrook residents to test a preliminary vaccine for this disease that had killed millions worldwide. From 1955 to 1970, the children were injected with the virus itself or made to drink chocolate milk mixed with feces from other infected children in order to study their immunity.
The Hideous Truths of Testing Vaccines on Humans

There is NOTHING ethical about testing these types of experiments on human beings, much less those of defenseless children.

However, “Doctor” Krugman and others in his field may disagree, citing their own twisted point of view of what would designate, in their mind, an ethic experiment if it meant saving other people’s lives – even at the cost of inhumane subjugation of innocent, unknowing children – and adults, actually, as we can see from the Tuskegee Syphilis studies that were carried out under the deceptive pretense of helping black men survive a disease – even deliberately inoculating them with the disease, and then keeping the cure from them to watch the disease run its course.

Of course, that’s the official narrative. The speculated REAL purpose may have been even more sinister – a targeted experimental trial, with the added bonus of genociding a particular race.

Getting back to the horrendous Willowbrook experiment, we have our very own Christine Grady offering her two cents (again, who is the DIRECTOR of BIOETHICS and HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH):

To this day, while many modern-day ethicists use the Willowbrook studies as an example of unjust human experimentation, there are always second opinions. “It’s complicated,” Grady says. To her knowledge, “Krugman’s first goal was to understand the disease…but I think there are some things about it that certainly don’t look good and would be hard to get approval today.”
The Hideous Truths of Testing Vaccines on Humans

Notice that there is no condemnation on her part for the atrocious experiments conducted on innocent children. Only that “It’s complicated” and the hardships of getting such a trial approved.

No remorse. No condolences. No, “That was awful. As head of the bioethic human subjects research team, I am appalled at the level of inconsideration and cold, meticulous calculations of these scientists on human lives. The reason why I’m head of bioethics is to make sure this never happens again.”

… No… all we get is, (paraphrasing:) “It’s complicated. But we can’t blame Krugman because he was doing it to study the disease. Children? Who cares about the children? He was studying the disease. That’s far more important. And as for us in our current time frame, we’d have a much more difficult time getting approved for these types of study. Thankfully though, I’m the head of human subject research and so I’m able to approve things like this without too much difficulty.”

So we have to ask ourselves, are we willing to put the WHOLE WORLD in jeopardy when the director and head of bioethics and researching human subjects has the same mindset as Dr. Krugman, especially in regards to the rest of the children on the planet? The children who, “in our current time frame”, are being pressured and coerced, manipulated, “incentivized” into taking a gene altering, unapproved vaccine all for the sake of “research” or whatever else agenda is at play in the hands of corrupt billionaires?

Canadian Government Lures Children With Ice Cream To Take COVID Vaccine Without Parental Consent

Who REALLY benefits from these vaccines?

I have to reiterate again that these vaccines are unnecessary. Even if the coronavirus is a real ailment, the severity of it has been exaggerated and enhanced to present much higher cases and deaths than the true outcome. And the people affected are the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions – who are already vulnerable to these types of illnesses. Most of the population will be completely fine according to numerous honest physicians.

And I shouldn’t have to mention the efforts of the corrupt pharmaceutical companies and complicit big tech platforms/media to smear alternative medicine as a treatment to curing the coronavirus to begin with.

Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin has been highly targeted and censored, even banned in some countries, although they have continuously shown efficacy in treating covid and have been used throughout the medical community with large success. The HONEST doctors have also recommended plenty of sunshine and vitamin C/D to help combat these viruses.

So, to repeat the question, why are hydroxychloroquine/ivermectin, and the doctors who have documented successes with these alternative medicines, been ridiculed and smeared and attacked from certain propagators of the vaccine?

Hm… maybe because…IT ACTUALLY WORKS?

If these vaccines are for depopulation, like THOUSANDS of intelligent, professional, and rational individuals have surmised, then these alternative medicines are COUNTERING tptsb’s goal and, in their mind, must be stopped.

In the same vein, if these vaccines are (also?) for human research to see what these mRNA, CRISPR, gene-therapy, nanoparticles, hydrogel (or whatever they happen to be – perhaps all of the above) biotech does – then again, these alternative treatments must be stopped.

If the vaccines are to deliberately create illnesses, viruses, diseases in people for the sake of repeated customers for the pharmaceutical companies – who would profit IMMENSELY from people’s side effects – then these alternative treatments must be stopped.

And if the FDA is forced to recognize that these alternative medicines are actually working, then they cannot legally recommend these vaccines for emergency authorization use. Thus ending the huge worldwide vaccination effort.

Either way you look at it, the public doesn’t benefit from these vaccines. But the billionaire globalists and corrupt pharmaceutical companies do.

“Saving us from covid” was their planned strategy (Event 201) all along in order to get us all to take the vaccine.

Speculation and Theories

My guess, is that each vaccine from these big pharmaceutical companies, are particularly suited for a specific purpose. Perhaps Moderna addresses the mrna directly… can’t spell moderna without mrna, right? (Ode to mrna?) Again, this is just theories that may be way off base, but with the amount of information that is coming out that this has been a planned agenda and multiple companies/individuals are complicit, I wouldn’t put it past them.

Then there’s Pfizer/Biontech, which may be suited to more of the biotechnology such as the nanoparticles or lipid tech, etc. Again, these are just speculations. But with Mrs. Christine Grady-Fauci heading the teams on human subjects research, and her husband being the leading authority on vaccines and the coronavirus situation – as well as their close partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – I would say that these speculations probably aren’t too far-fetched of an idea. Especially now that people are realizing that Fauci had close ties with the Wuhan lab and funding of the gain-of-function research.

The Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) is another vaccine that offers a different method to tackle the human immune response system – I’m sorry, I mean, tackle the “coronavirus”, of course. We also have AstraZeneca and other variants of the vaccines as well.

Again, all of these vaccines are different in their structure not to address the best way to combat the coronavirus directly, like what the cover story is, but to simply see what these different technologies can do to the human system. After all, Christine Grady is head of human subjects research, and she saw nothing wrong with Dr. Krugman’s method of studying hepatitis who deliberately injected innocent children with the disease just to track its progress.

Now imagine the depopulation efforts, combined with new technology like CRISPR, mRNA, etc., as well as other people’s testimonies from decades ago warning the population that a dangerous bioweapon – like a vaccine – is in the works and is planned to be administered to the world population by any means necessary.

Here is a short snippet about vaccine developer Dr. Veert Ganden Bossche and his appeal to halt the vaccine trials:

In a recent turn of events Vaccine Developer Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D., DVM delivered a dire warning to mankind in an interview on March 8th, imploring all nations to immediately change course and halt the experimental COVID-19 vaccine trials. The future of the human race is at stake!

Dr. Bossche is a world leading vaccine scientist and virologist who worked for GAVI and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. With credibility and expertise that’s off the charts and backed by sound science, Dr. Bossche instructed nations to HALT all COVID-19 vaccinations immediately, or an “uncontrollable monster” will be unleashed.

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment!

The link above shows Amazing Polly making this connection back in May of last year. All stemming from her investigation into one, seemingly innocuous tweet:

Realizing that “Christine Grady” was the only name not highlighted with a twitter account, Amazing Polly takes the initiative to research who she is and her relation to the covid-19 Ethical Challenges for Nurses agenda.

From there, the mind-boggling revelation that Christine Grady is MARRIED to our very own Anthony Fauci comes to light.

Amazing Polly also references a study that Christine Grady published under the name of “Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight”:

“She [Christine Grady] goes through medical research on human subjects, over the course of the last… 80 years or so, since WWII, and she categorizes the phases that they’ve gone through; and where she ends up, is that in 2005 we were getting into a communitarian based paradigm of human research subjects.

And what she essentially means is, they have made it so that the general public feels like it is their duty as humans to possibly sacrifice their own lives for medical research. They don’t even have to buy people anymore. Like, pay them. They don’t have to have people who are sick. They have now done such a mind job on the general public that they can convince a lot of perfectly healthy people to come in and let them experiment on them for free! For the “good of humanity”.

That’s where Christine Grady‘s head is at, in terms of her ethics.”

Amazing Polly

Keep in mind, that even if these people think that they are doing a public service to “save grandma” by injecting themselves with these suspicious/dangerous vaccines, the REAL underlying reason for these vaccines are anything BUT saving anyone. In fact, with more evidence coming to fruition about these corrupt agencies, it’s becoming clearer that the vaccines themselves are the TRUE disease, and that humankind would be best poised to avoid these at all costs for the good of humanity.

Speaking of “for the good of humanity”, where do we draw the line? If “studies” and “authority figures” come out saying that drinking the blood of the innocent is essential in saving humanity, would we all just jump in line and say, “Well, if it’s for the good of humanity, sign me up for a nice glass of young blood.”?

Silicon Valley’s fountain-of-youth plan to suck blood from young people just hit an FDA snag
Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will

This sets an incredibly UNETHICAL precedent on what lengths people will go to to save their own life, or that of their loved one. Where do we draw the invisible/”let your conscience be your guide” line in terms of morally ethic or reprehensible actions on other people’s lives in order to save our own? When will we finally say that my life is not worth harming another, especially under the behest of inhumane scientific research and experimentation?

More importantly, how did studies/research like this even get the approval to begin with?

2. Radioactive Materials in Pregnant Women

2-Radioactive-Materials-in-Pregnant-Women

 

Image Source

 

“Shortly after World War II, with the impending Cold War forefront on the minds of Americans, many medical researchers were preoccupied with the idea of radioactivity and chemical warfare. In an experiment at Vanderbilt University, 829 pregnant women were given “vitamin drinks” they were told would improve the health of their unborn babies. Instead, the drinks contained radioactive iron and the researchers were studying how quickly the radioisotope crossed into the placenta. At least seven of the babies later died from cancers and leukemia, and the women themselves experienced rashes, bruises, anemia, loss of hair and tooth, and cancer.”

Source: The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

“An exceptionally large-scale radiation exposure experiment at Vanderbilt University was funded by the U.S. Public Health Service and involved 820 poor pregnant Caucasian women who were given tracer doses of radioactive iron in a “cocktail” drink. The researchers worked with the Tennessee State Department of Health and they did not inform the women what was in the drink, nor were they informed that they were part of an experiment.”

1945–1947: Vanderbilt “Nutrition Study” Exposed 820 pregnant women to radioactive iron

One could argue that since most of these experiments happened in the mid-1900’s, that there’s no way that anything of the sort could be happening in today’s time. And perhaps that’s why a “bioethic” team was created to begin with. In order to halt experiments like this to begin with.

But I would disagree. The whole point of creating an organization focused on these kinds of questionable research and studies is to protect the agencies attempting these awful experiments and to create a shield, so to speak. It’s interesting that there’s a lot of inter-connected relations within these industries and partnerships that involve family members and friends working in conjunction with each other to support and/or condemn whoever they wish.

Another relation, Alison Fauci – daughter of Christine Grady and Anthony Fauci, works as a software engineer for Twitter. But I’m sure that has no connection to initiating “misinformation” tactics on the platform in order to protect this strange vaccination propaganda…

Twitter Suspends Organization for Announcing They Will Release More Fauci Emails | The Big Tech site cited their COVID-19 misinformation policy as a reason for the suspension

Even if Alison herself had no bearing on any so-called “misinformation” censoring/banning of accounts on Twitter, the point of having connected family members engaged in something as large as a worldwide medical enterprise to vaccinate every human being on the planet, and a huge platform such as Twitter banning any kind of information they deem as “harmful” or “inciting hate speech”/”misinformation”, cannot be overlooked.

Bottom line

It would seem from Christine Grady‘s job positions and titles, that her role is designated in how to best coerce, convince, bribe, reason, psychologically manipulate, etc. people into becoming willing participants in experiments and research – even if they don’t realize that’s what they’re signing up for. Would this role be helpful in getting as many people into taking these unnecessary vaccines – even possibly colluding with big tech platforms and mainstream media to deceive the public?…

I think the answer speaks for itself.

So are we sure we want to put our trust in the likes of Mrs. Grady (chief of the department of bioethics at the NIH/National Institutes of Health and director of Human Subjects Research) and her husband, Anthony Fauci (director of the NIAID/U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, physician with the NIH, and leading director of the White House coronavirus taskforce)?

And who could forget their close ties to Bill Gates… another huge controversial figure in regards to vaccines, eugenics, population control, and mad scientist efforts to block out the sun (interesting that there is a correlation between those actually with covid having a vitamin D deficiency…) and genetically mutated crops and mosquitos. Surely there’s no way he would endeavor to breach the morally bioethical line to genetically modify humans though, right?

…Nevermind.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.

The Dead are Rising to Share Their Views, to Vote, and Get Covid Tested

Even the Dead are not Safe from Propaganda

Yes, folks. We are apparently living in a time where the dead are allowed to come back to life in order to share their views (as long as it fits a certain narrative, of course) and vote (only for a particular candidate, of course) and get tested (positive for Covid, of course).

These are certainly interesting times, when even people who are alive that have a difference of opinion to the mainstream, are being shut out, censored, ridiculed and smeared.

Yet, for some reason, a voice was given to those who have passed away. I did not realize that the passion that these people have to get their points across could reach through the scientific barrier of conscious limitations and access the world of the living.

But here we are.

Perhaps in a world so filled with electricity and technology, their electromagnetic pulses were amplified, which gave them an ability to infiltrate the computerized systems of today’s age. Who knows? It’s not like someone is deliberately using these poor deceased individual’s names to further a certain agenda and enforce a certain conformity upon the rest of the population, right?

No, no. It’s more likely that these souls that have passed away decided that those of us that are still living needed more guidance and direction in the way that we’re heading, and in their utmost concern must have come back to help us make that decision by participating in the voting system, and/or getting tested for covid. Which is what allegedly happened to Troy Whittington’s Mom.

Here is Troy’s account on what happened, and a few other examples of the boundaries that the “dead” have crossed in order to make their statements…

Sandra Ann Whittington

Imagine Troy Whittington’s shock and dismay when he opened up a letter dated August 20, 2020, from the Shelby County Health Department that stated that his mother, Sandra Ann Whittington, tested positive for covid. It must have been quite the reaction, seeing as how his mother passed away on February 16, 2020.

When Troy called the Health Department to get answers, he was told that she took the test on June 20th. The lady he spoke with did not have any answers for him at the time, and told him that she would have to check in with her supervisor to provide any more information.

Troy also raises a few other good points on this egregious error:

“I would just like for the health department to be more accurate.” He added, “They have a record of her death there. That is where I got the death certificate from and it’s in the same building they’re sending out saying she is positive, which is not possible.”

Whittington also would like to point out, if his mom had been alive and tested positive, why did it take so long for the notification to go out?

“We’re talking two months later. She needs to be quarantined for 10, well we’ve got 60 days from the time of the test to get the letter out to her which is unacceptable,” said Whittington.

wkyc.com

I definitely don’t mean to make light of the situation, but if Mrs. Whittaker was walking around somehow (even after being cremated), and went to get a covid test – which she was positive for – then she was still walking around for 2 months, allegedly without being quarantined, before she got her positive results back. …By that time the coronavirus would have run its course, and everyone she was in contact with in the meantime could have been exposed to this virus.

Now, of course with anything, one should always use critical thinking skills to try and determine the different possibilities on how this came about, so I can offer up a few:

–  The most common would be a simple clerical error. More common than one would think. Perhaps someone with a name similar to that of Sandra Ann Whittington’s indeed went to get tested for the covid, and the clerk pulled up this particular Sandra’s name by mistake. It’s an easy error to make and I can see it happening. However, when dealing with a serious matter such as this, all necessary precautions should be taking place to avoid this possibility. (and that still wouldn’t account for the unnecessarily long wait time that the patient would have waited for the test results to come back. …Unless that was due to another clerical error as well.)

– An unfortunate glitch in the system. (Not the Matrix system… the computer system. Although for all conspiracy theory lovers out there, this is one that could be speculated upon.) This could happen as well, I would surmise. Not as likely, but possible nonetheless.

– This is a deliberate attempt to use deceased people’s names to rank the amount of positive covid results up. The likelihood of someone finding out that a deceased person’s name is on a “confidential” database is pretty low, and the amount of positive cases in a medical facility will perhaps boost funding, as has been described happening in numerous different outlets.

There are many more different possibilities than these, of course, but wanted to mention a few just off the top of my head.

There is also the reason that Alisa Haushalter gave to Troy Whittington, although even with that, it’s not as comforting or understandable as one would think:

According to the letter Director Haushalter sent to Whittington, “There were internal procedures regarding post-mortem testing by the Tennessee Department of Health that resulted in a positive test being reported to the Shelby County Health Department. Subsequently, the Shelby County Health Department issued the letter and you should not have received the letter.”

wthr.com

This seems very suspicious to me. Perhaps because I have a very cynical mind at times, this could indicate that the post-mortem testing was done for the sole purpose of finding “positive” covid cases from the deceased, so that they could send in these numbers to the CDC. After all, the letter states that Whittington “should not have received the letter” and instead should have just gone to the CDC.

Then, to make matters even worse, upon following up with the “initial testing”, found that Sandra Whittington had a “false positive”, so therefore did not have covid at all. …Well, that’s comforting, I guess. Or not, seeing as how if the tests are this unreliable, how do we determine which test was the legitimate one and which was showing false results?

I digress.

I guess the fact of the matter is, dear Sandra Ann Whittington did not come back from the dead after all to administer to a covid test. Although she did apparently donate her body to science, so I guess in a way she did.

Well, I guess that’s one theory busted. At least in Sandra Whittington’s case. But we still have a few more instances in which I can show that the dead really did come back to announce their views.

Patty Duke (Anna Marie Duke / Anna Pearce)

Some may remember Patty Duke from, well, The Patty Duke Show. She also had quite the filmography as seen here imdb.com.

Unfortunately, she passed away on March 29, 2016 from sepsis, but that didn’t stop her from supporting the FCC agenda to end net neutrality (three separate times: May 24, 2017 / August 7, 2017 / August 8, 2017 …Oh wait. Hold up. At least 4 separate times. This one appearing under the name “Anna Pearce”, for August 7, 2017.)

Tweets showing proof of Patty Duke's messages in support of ending net neutrality.

FCC Published Fake Comments by Dead Actor Patty Duke, Sean Astin’s Mother, Supporting End of Net Neutrality

Mackenzie Astin brought the attention of this outrageous fiasco out on twitter, calling out to the FCC and Ajit Pai to investigate how this happened.

Shockingly, he wasn’t the only one who had questions.

Not only did we have a case of a deceased person being extremely concerned with net neutrality, so much so that they had to file 4 separate forms to announce their opinions, but we also have cases of living people who are apparently leaving comments to the FCC government site without any recollection of having doing so.

Now, I’m not going to pretend to know everything about the FCC and the net neutrality aspect and regulations, because honestly it confuses the he11 out of me. If there’s anything I do know, it’s that you can’t trust politicians people, and people will often twist their words in order to make something unappealing, appealing. Or vice versa. (Or they’ll just flat out lie.)

So my issue with this is not about the whole Obama administration, or Thomas Wheeler, Ajit Pai, or who is for what and who is against what and such in regards to net neutrality, but it is to look at the deceptive tactics that are being used in order to push for a certain outcome.

The fact that not only are there multiple deceased people leaving comments on a government website in support of or in opposition of a certain bill, there are also accounts of plenty of living people who are being used, without their knowledge, to administer to a specific point of view.

Take the cases of Senator Jeff Merkley and Senator Pat Toomey. Both of their names were used, allegedly without their knowledge, in order to support ending net neutrality.

This is a fun case, because it’s very rare when you have two people on the opposite side of the spectrum, one a Democrat, the other a Republican, actually coming together to tackle a common cause.

Jeff Merkley

Now even though it appears as if Pat Toomey is in support of ending net neutrality, at least he can agree upon the fact the subterfuge and manipulation enacted upon this particular bill with the usage of multiple people’s accounts (fake, live, dead, or otherwise) is a “deliberate misuse of Americans’ personal information”:

“The federal rulemaking process is an essential part of our democracy and allows Americans the opportunity to express their opinions on how government agencies decide important regulatory issues,” their letter said. “As such, we are concerned about the aforementioned fraudulent activity. We need to prevent the deliberate misuse of Americans’ personal information and ensure that the FCC is working to protect against current and future vulnerabilities in its system.”
washingtontimes.com

We finally get some answers on this blatant attempt at ending net neutrality, but not before some interesting confusion about an apparent false DDoS attack on the servers.

Further citation from cnet.com alludes to the Russians being the culprit:

This site: pewresearch.org, breaks down the statistics on how often each comment was used, and the numbers of times it was submitted by certain various names. It is eye-opening, and should serve as a reminder to us all about the dangers and misrepresentation we could be seeing online on a day-to-day basis, even from those friends’ and families’ accounts we think we know (or our very own accounts…). It is also a reminder to us all that those we think are gone, still live on, apparently, and use their presence to try and sway the public opinion on matters of business preference…

It makes one wonder how often this very deceptive tactic has been used, not just in this arena, but in many others.

Which brings me to –

The Presidential Election

It’s no secret anymore. Dead people vote. If we could all just unite instead of constantly being divided, then we can come to the unanimous decision that Dead Lives Matter too, and we should respect their decision.

So what if an overwhelming amount of them “allegedly” voted Democrat this year?

MuhahahahahahahahahaMAD says

Did you hear about the Chicago Republican who died?
He votes Democrat now.

After all, Joe Biden’s whole campaign program encompasses the “battle for the souls of the nation” and “souls to the polls”. And since we know what kind of turnout he received at his actual speeches (whether they were “invite only” and/or “from your car because of social distancing” or not), there is no argument that Trump’s turnout trumped his. But perhaps that’s because the eyes of the living couldn’t see all the dead people apparently at Joe Biden’s campaigns.

And, as we saw with the results of the voting, it looks like Mr. Biden got his wish. It seems as if numerous souls who have crossed over couldn’t help themselves as their adoration for Joe must have been so expansive, that their souls have literally transcended time and space to vote. Even if they died before this election; or even before Mr. Trump’s entire presidency, for that matter.

Records show that the elections board received an absentee ballot from a Frances Reckhow of Staten Island, a registered Democrat.

The BOE mailed an absentee ballot “requested” by Frances M. Reckhow of Bedell Avenue on Sept. 24.

But there’s a problem: Frances Reckhow, who was born on July 6, 1915, and would be 105 today, died in 2012, according to an obituary filed with the Staten Island Advance.

Despite dying 8 years ago, Reckhow supposedly mailed the ballot back on Oct. 6 and the BOE received it and declared it valid on Oct. 8, tracking records show.

nworeport.me

And this article: Whistleblower Leaks Photo Of Dead People Born In The Year 1900 Voting In 2020 Presidential Election, alludes to the fact that numerous dead people were manually entered for an election poll queue program.

This, to be honest, is outrageous.

Are they implying that 100+ old people are obviously dead and can’t vote? Did these people manually check each person and make sure that they are physically dead, or did they just assume that because of their age? And even if they are dead, then what? They’re not allowed to vote?

This sounds to me like discrimination.

I thought, we, as a “united” nation, and working to be inclusive, can look beyond their “living capacity” and allow them their own opinion. (Well, seeing as how we can’t even do that with the living, I suppose it’s no wonder.)

The actions of “dead voters” have raised the eyebrows of many, and the allegations of voter fraud have run rampant this year. Many speculating that the democrats have rigged the election.

Tucker Carlson: Yes, dead people voted in this election and Democrats helped make it happen
Officials stop scheme to register dead voters as Democrats
Thousands of Dead People Voting In PA: 100% For Biden – (Now, I wanted to point out that this headline is 100% misleading. While I do think that there was fraudulent activity going on behind this election, and that the democrats are by no means completely innocent in this scheme, and even if this title is 100% true, there is nothing in this article that can prove it. I specifically sought out an article like this one so that I can assess it and see if there was actual proof that these votes were being cast for Biden, specifically. There wasn’t any.
So again, please be aware of any type of misleading news. I decided to keep the article here, however, because I enjoyed the youtube video by Fleccas Talks (which is legitimate and not misleading) that it featured and wanted to show you how easy it is to be side-tracked by a title, especially if it aligns with the same view as you.)

Having said all of this, we can’t forget a couple of choice quotes from Mr. Joe Biden either:

youtube.com/GOP War Room (I’m not sure how long this video will stay up, but it’s fun while it lasts. If this video gets removed, please let me know and I will replace it.)

“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” – Joe Biden

Who is Joe Biden talking to in this campaign? Is he talking to the fellow democrats that have helped him rig this election? The people in the audience? His campaign members?

Obviously not. We all know by now that he’s talking to the ghostly souls in the audience that are overwhelming in number but that none of us can see. Come on people. Think.

youtube.com/The News Junkie’s Cartoons (Again, please let me know if this video gets removed and I will replace it.)

“Folks, we got a lotta work to do. I don’t need you to get me elected; I need you once I’m elected.” – Joe Biden

I know you don’t need us living, breathing souls to get you elected, since you’re using the dead’s apparent passion for a democratic election this year to do your work for you. But you need us once you are elected to do all of the heavy lifting, since we all know that ghosts can mostly just interfere with electronics and lightweight objects such as mail-in ballots, and not so much with the physical labor.

I’m onto you, Joe. I’m onto you.

Now, before you think dead people can’t speak for themselves, I have to leave you with Facebook’s own “Legacy Contact“.
Facebook's Legacy Contact

I mean, this completely sounds legit. It’s not like Facebook has been known to run tests or experiments on its own users or anything: Facebook is way Creepier than we Thought

And it’s not like Mark Zuckerberg thinks we’re all idiots for using Facebook, right?
“They trust me. Dumb fvck$” (Mark’s words, not mine.)

Sure, sure, he was only 19 when he made that comment, and he claims to Jose Antonio Vargas, “I think I’ve grown and learned a lot” since he made those statements.

But then we have this lovely tidbit that Mark Zuckerberg is at least admitting it’s for research, and hey! he’s even willing to pay “select members” money for opting in on the experiment: Facebook will pay users to log off before 2020 election

To assess the impact of social media on voting, the company will pay selected members up to $120 to deactivate their accounts beginning at the end of September.
nypost.com

It’s in the name of reasearch!

So of course it’s okay to manipulate and use subterfuge to experiment once again on the many unwitting Facebook users during and specifically concerning the election. One of the most important events of American heritage. (At least until people realize that the election/voting process is nothing more than an illusion… but this is not the time or place to discuss this particular speculation. Moving on!)

So, you know, to imply that Facebook would do anything nefarious to these “Legacy Contact” pages and perhaps leave dead people’s accounts running on bots/AI or anything of the like, is a grievous offense and I am appalled that such a theory is even considered about the good name of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and his colleagues.

Oh… I’m the one making these silly theories? Well, my opinion still stands. It makes more sense to ignore all of these suspicious activities and just trust blindly to mega-corporations that make billions of dollars at our expense.

And, apparently, milking the dead for all they’re worth too.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

WORLD PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY! Stop Big Pharma’s DNA “Vaccine” Experiment! - “Mass Vaccination will Breed Dangerous Variants & Destroy Our Immunity” — Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Dr. Peter McCullough / John Leake – Full Interview [Transcript] - Renowned doctor exposes worldwide covid treatment suppression and corruption of the medical and governmental agencies.
Anthony Fauci’s Wife: Christine Grady – Hidden Face of the Vaccine Trials? - What is Christine Grady's role in the vaccine agenda?
REPOST: Proof that the Pandemic Was Planned With a Purpose - Many connections involving complicit huge name individuals and organizations.
FLASHBACK | COVER-UP: ‘Scientific Reductivism’, The Talented Mr. Fauci - A look into Anthony Fauci's involvement into medical/health corruption.
David Goldberg’s FINAL WORDS: Project Pogo and Project Zyphr | Full Transcript - Extermination effort and implementation of a world government.
“America’s Pastor” Billy Graham Exposed - Exposing Graham's ties to freemasonry and their agendas.