Are the Vaccines Being Systematically Distributed to Cause Large Amounts of Deaths in the U.S.? | Professional Data Analysts Think It May

“This is a worldwide experiment. It’s intentional.”

Dr. Jane Ruby shares with Stew Peters and their viewers the shocking implication that the vaccines being sent out may be distributed to certain countries by a specific design; to initiate large numbers of disabilities outside of the U.S., and large amounts of death within the U.S.

At least according to the data being compiled of the certain batch/lot numbers that are contributing to the highest amount of vaccine adverse reactions.

This data was assessed by a team that includes:

Mike Yeadon – Ex Head of Respiratory Research at Pfizer UK

Alexandra Latypova – researcher – analyst – Biotech CEO

Craig Paardekooper – researcher – computer programmer – author

Jessica Rose – researcher – analyst – government consultant

Walter Wagner – consultant on pharma compliance and legal affairs

Source: howbad.info/background

For clarity reasons, I want to add that the howbad.info website does state that they gathered all of their information from the U.S. VAERS database. So one would have to consider that this may not take into account many of the adverse events of vaccines that are being distributed to other foreign-speaking countries (China, Germany, Israel, Russia, Africa, etc., etc., etc.)

It is not specifically clear from this interview where the outside-of-the-US data is coming from. It could have been from the hackers that Dr. Jane Ruby mentioned, or specifically from the US VAERS database; but again, it is not verified. When there is further information, I will try and update this post with the new findings.

Please keep all of this in mind and keep a discerning eye out through all of the research presented. Using critical thinking and asking additional questions should always be approached when coming across new data.

Many thanks to all of those involved for their continued research and investigation into these incredibly important matters, and the groups/individuals involved for helping to share and spread these messages.

Full transcript below. Some embellishment has been added for emphasis.

Stew Peters: “Well Happy New Year and welcome back to the Stew Peters Show. We hope that all of you had a great Christmas season with your families, despite the best efforts of Tony Fauci and the Biden junta to make it a miserable time. But that’s what sets us apart from them. We can feel real love and real joy.

Still, it’s a dangerous world out there, and the enemies of the American people will be just as committed to destroying us in 2022, as they were in ’21. And that means more masking, more restrictions, more vaccine mandates.

Dr. Jane Ruby joins us for her first segment of the year. She says that she has the receipts to prove that vaccine toxicity varies by batch, which we’ve covered before, but now it’s possible to find out if the shot that you’re being pressured to take is from one of these tainted, and deadly, batches.”

Dr. Jane Ruby: “Yes, Happy New Year’s, Stew.

Um, sorry to start out with such bad news. But what we’ve learned is, after I spent 3 hours in an interview with these analysts who have actually taken the previous work of toxicity in lot numbers to a whole new level, what they’re telling us is that this is a worldwide human experiment, it’s intentional, and there’s a subplot to this. That there is an attack on the American people.

What they basically told me is that all 3 companies: Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson&Johnson, which is essentially Janssen, are testing; they’re actively testing. And it’s worse than what we thought. Because there’s evidence that these companies are intentionally deploying toxic batches.

They’ve also identified what they call “supertoxic” batches. And they’ve released these lot numbers. And I felt it was like an emergency to get this to the American people, and the people of the world.

I want to show you what they found, on – in terms of most dangerous lots. And when we’re done with this segment, I urge everyone to go to howbad.info, where you can check the lots, and you can know which lots are deadly and dangerous, uh, before – if you’re thinking or on the fence of getting any of these bioweapon injections.

When you look at the first column here for Pfizer, I want you to know that the most deadly, dangerous lot will begin with EW. E like Edward, W like winning. EW. Second to that is F like Frank, A like apple. And then F like Frank, C like Charlie. Sorry I don’t know the military terms for that.”

Credited to: howbad.info/Stew Peters Show

Dr. Jane Ruby (cont. @2:28): The most harmful lot for children, under this EW, FA, FC, was something identified; the whole lot number is EW01A2 [editor’s note: could not verify this specific lot id in the howbad.info website] But you could go to howbad.info and look up… the company, and put your lot number in.

For under Pfizer for adults, the most toxic, deadly batches begin with E like Edward, N like Nancy. And then second to that is E like Edward, R like Robert.

Under Moderna, they found under for all ages, adults and – I don’t believe they have a young child authorization yet, but their toxic, deadly batches end in 20A – Alpha. They’re supertoxic.

Under Moderna, have, in the middle section, they got very clever. Uh, Pfizer coded their lot numbers – all companies coded their lot numbers, with – so that they would know where the most toxic batches are. And I’m going to share with you why that’s important in a little bit. But Moderna took it a step further with a little cleverness, because they embedded their code, for their most toxic amount, either in dose or, or chemical composition, under the letters – in the middle of that lot number, J, K like kite, L like love, M like Mary.

The analysts were a team that included the well-known Dr. Michael Yeadon, Craig Paardekooper, from Africa, a woman named Alexandra Latypova, who’s in California, our well-known Jessica Rose, that we’ve interviewed on the Stew Peters Show before, and another analyst named Walter Wagner.

Look. This EW lot for children, anything that starts with EW, is responsible for almost – watch this – all adverse events in children, all ER visits, all hospitalizations, all life-threatening events, disabilities, and all deaths. This is serious.

And here’s the kicker, Stew. All of these deadly lots that we’re going to show you, are already in circulation, remembering that there could be up to 1.5 million doses per lot. This quantification is set by each company. And the way they know that, is because they have looked at the companies and they’ve gotten into their systems to see how the companies have laid this out.

They made the assertion, Stew, that – and this was shocking – that what these companies are doing is they’re exporting disability as defined by the VAERs system itself, out to Europe. Ex-USA. And what they’re doing is they’re, they’re exporting, if you will, death – more death, more lethal doses, in the United States.

Now let me, let me share with everyone, there’s another chart I want to show you with a scatter plot. It’s called Pfizer batches. And when Pfizer batches, their batch codes, rather, were arranged alpha-numerically, along the X-axis, the following patterns emerged. And you can see these dots, these vertical dots, represent batch numbers. And again, there’s that EW. You can see the green stack of dots. Those are children’s doses. Even though the company claims that the amount is less than the adult dose, supposedly, we have no idea what’s in there.”

Credited to: howbad.info/Stew Peters Show

Dr. Jane Ruby (cont. @5:54): “They are actively testing… – Stew, I’m gonna tell you something. They are conducting what we call lethal dose studies.

Now in pharmaceutical drug development, lethal dose studies looks at how much you need to cause death. And obviously, we – they’re not done in humans. In people. They’re always done in animals, although they’ve slowed down in recent years because people have become concerned, even though they’re rats and mice, lower forms, they’ve become concerned about the cruelty to animals. But they’re never done in people.

And what’s happening here, is they are, basically, from the analysis, these analysts tell us that these 3 companies are actively – RIGHT NOW – conducting lethal dose studies.

Let me explain lethal dose. They take the highest amount of chemical, in terms of dosage and composition. And what they do is, they determine, the leth- what lethal amount to test half the population. It’s one of the means to assess acute toxicity prior to going into human studies. Um, and like I said, it has been largely fazed out. They are – they are conducting it without informed consent, it’s against all ethical and regulatory rules. In other words, we believe these companies are just proceeding with impunity, because there is nothing stopping them.

I want to also show people something. Before we get to a little bit of a larger look at the lot numbers and what’s happening, and how these analysts are so sure that this is not by randomization; this is not by chance. I want to take a look at the parts of a Moderna batch – code.

I mentioned earlier that Moderna got a little more complex and clever. Remember, these companies, we now know, are actually embedding into their lots, a code to tell them which doses, which lots, are toxic, which ones are causing disabilities, and what types of disabilities. I mean, this is absolutely outrageous.

When you look at the parts of the Moderna batch code, you see here this number. It’s 011, the letter L like love, 20A. 20A. As we mentioned before, in the first chart I showed, is the most lethal, that, you know, is the most lethal batch of lot codes in the Moderna program right now. And remember, all of these numbers I’m going to show you, are from the middle of November up until as late as December 16, of just a couple of weeks ago.

So when you look at this numbers, 011L20A, what you’re looking at in the 011, is the temporal batch order. So how it’s being developed over time, and deployed by the company. The L is the concentration – it determines, it tells the company the toxicity and number of adverse reactions. And then the 20A is qualitative. It’s the ingredient. In either 20A, which was the most highly toxic of their batch lots, or 21A came up as well.

So this is their clever scheme to – this is not a matter of, you know, throwing this out. You know. We’re going to try this new technology and we’re getting, with impunity, we’re going to see what the safety issues come- The reason they’re not concerned about safety issues is because this is an a priori design. This is designed ahead of time to send out toxic batches and then to gather their information.

I – so anyway, let’s move on to – there’s just so much information that I learned from these analysts. They told me – “

Stew Peters: “And how did these – how did these analysts know that these are coming from Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson&Johnson?”

Dr. Jane Ruby: “Because, first of all, they, they told me that they were informed by professional hackers, that this is big news – nobody else has broken this. That these professional hackers got into Pfizer, and Moderna systems, and they were able to verify the lots.

Dr. Paardekooper has a list of all the Moderna batches deployed so far. And Moderna also has a web tool – this’ll probably disappear after the Stew Peters Show airs, it has a web tool for checking the expiration dates for batches. And these computer guys hacked Moderna’s website, and got the entire list of Moderna batches with a full list of batch codes. And they did the same for Pfizer.

I just want to make something really clear. This exporting death to the USA and exporting disability to EU, what they found was that the Mo- for example, in the Moderna analysis, there were 10 times the death rate in the United States, than in the EU, and in the Moderna group, there were 10 times more disabilities in the EU group, compared with the USA.

So this, this is – all 3 companies are using their lot numbers to label… they’re looking – and when a researcher does an a priori study, they’re testing concentrations. Remember I told you it was a dose finding study? But this dose finding range is much higher than just testing, you know, a therapeutic group of range to find out what works. This is lethal dose testing at its finest.

And we’re gonna talk about this more, Stew, I know we’re limited on time, but it was really important. It’s what’s most important is that before you let your child get in line for these bioweapon shots, if you don’t believe anything we’ve said, at least ask them for the lot number and if it starts with EW or EN.

Just before we close out, there’s a list I want to show you of batch codes with highlights. These batch codes are in a perfect mathematical series, Stew. And what this tells us is, if it was random, you see these highlighted EN lot numbers? These are all thousands, 2 or 3 thousand deaths and disabilities per these batches, but look at how it drops. It drops immediately down to 37, 25, 23. The subsequent batch numbers.”

Credited to: howbad.info/Stew Peters Show

Dr. Jane Ruby (cont. @12:05): If this was random, it would not just drop off so sharply like that. You’re going to hear more from these analysts, you’re going to hear more and more – But you are empowered now to look up if you’ve had one of these shots, you can look up your lot number… Please don’t take anymore of this. This is not going to stop.

Stew Peters: “Yeah. There’s just absolutely no reason why anybody should have their kid in line to take these bioweapons. But before knowing what we know now, you subjected yourself or your young ones to these injections, and you want to know, now you have these lot numbers, which you can find at stewpeters.tv.

You’re right, I am out of time, I gotta go. Dr. Jane Ruby, thank you so much. Happy New Year. And, I mean, this is unbelievable. [Dr. Jane Ruby: “Thank you. We’ll continue.”] So yeah. This is going to go away though. This search function’s going to go away.

And thanks to these hackers, as well, [Dr. Jane Ruby: “Yes. Bravo.”] and for your time in investigating and being inside of that meeting. Dr. Jane Ruby, thank you so much. God bless you.” [Dr. Jane Ruby: “Thank you Stew.”]

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by hakan german from Pixabay

Is Mankind Able to Prevent Abuse of New Technologies Against Democracy and Human Rights?

An investigative look into the government’s attempts to assault (control) our mind.

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca
Original article written by Mojmir Babacek (November 25, 2021)

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

When in 1951 American secret services started work on Project Artichoke, they had set their goals as follows: “Evolution and development of any method by which we can get information from a person against his will and without his knowledge… Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against such fundamental laws of nature such as self preservation?”.

This publication in the New York Times was a result of the scandal caused by the abuse of the patients at the Canadian mental hospital Allan Memorial Institute. In another CIA report quoted in the New York Times article it is stated:

“Many phases of the research in the control of human behavior involve a high degree of sensitivity. The professional reputations of outside researchers are in jeopardy since the objectives of such research are widely regarded as anti-ethical or illegal” .

This classified research is going on until present time. The only difference is that when some 200 American diplomats and CIA employees were exposed to attacks by pulsed microwaves the American press started writing on the subject (see this and this),  without disclosing the whole range of effects of electromagnetic radiation on the human nervous system.

As a matter of fact the human nervous system is filled with electrolyte (solution of water and salt, full of ions), which functions as an antenna, which can transform the electromagnetic  signals coming from the outside into electrical currents which will propagate in nervous tissue and produce the firing of neurons. In this way the activity of the human nervous system can be controlled by electromagnetic waves or microwaves, if they are pulsed in the frequencies corresponding to the frequencies of the activity of the human nervous system (click on “Psychoelectronic threat to democracy“ and at the bottom of the page open the link).

Billions of dollars and euros, that were invested into brain research in the past years, made it possible to map the frequencies of the brain activity and in this way open the road to the manipulation of human perceptions, emotions and even thoughts and memories by electromagnetic radiation. The scientists in California developed a device that  can interpret the vowels and consonants in our brain for effective writing, or in other words, write down people’s  thoughts. According to the researchers, this device is at least 90% accurate.  In 2017 scientists believed that this machine could  be linked to smartphones within the next few years.  Device that Translates your Thoughts in to Words will be in Smartphones soon – Research Snipers, which means that it will  connect the brains of people directly to cell phone system and the internet.

Knowing the brain frequencies of vowels and consonants enables scientists to reverse this procedure and transmit thoughts into the brains of people. In 2007 The Washington Post published an article where it wrote:

“In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented…  a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone’s head…  In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding that 2002 patent — records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear — the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it“ (Mind Games, washingtonpost.com)

When the phrases, transmitted into the brain, will be converted into ultrasound, people will not realize them, because they will not hear them, but the phrases will reach their brain anyway and in this way will  become the targeted persons “thoughts“. In this way the goals of the research, cited at the beginning of this article, were reached. If you do not believe it think about the fact that in 2019 scientists in the USA were capable of implanting into the memory of mice a memory of an odor they had never smelled, and made the mice react to it, see this. Also, in August 2020, the scientist Rafael Yuste, teaching at the U.S. Columbia University told the New York Times  that “once the manipulation goes directly into the brain… you will not be able to tell you are being manipulated”, see this.

In Russia this kind of brain research had already started in the thirties of the past century. In August 27, 1991 the Russian newspaper ‘Komsomolskaya Pravda’ published the statement by Victor Sedletski, the vice president of the League of Independent Scientists of the USSR, where he wrote:

“As an expert and juridical personality I declare: In Kiev (and this is serious) the mass production … of psychotronic biogenerators was launched. I can not assert that during the coup d‘etat exactly the Kiev generators were used… All the same the fact that they were used is evident to me. What are the psychotronic generators? It is an electronic equipment producing the effect of guided control in the human organism“ (electronic copy of the article – Authors of Project Zombie discovered in Kiev).

In  1992 the Russian Independent Institute of Foreign Policy published in the weekly ‘Stolitsa’ the article “MC-ultra program“ (the title was inspired by the CIA mind control program from the sixties, that was quoted at the beginning of this article). In the article Victor Sedletski informed that in 1982 the USSR started the development of quite new radar system, which allowed it to control any place on the planet and that the system could be used for the creation of “psychotronic field for mind control“. He did not say exactly which project he was talking about, but it seems that he was talking about the system Sura, which was built in 1981 near the city Nizhnyi Novgorod in the central part of Russia. It was financed by the Russian ministry of defense and later it was controlled by Radiophysical Science Research Institute. See this and this.

By pulsing electromagnetic waves, the radar system Sura can produce in the ionosphere varying electrical currents and those currents then will produce electromagnetic waves in the frequencies of pulses, which will reach vast areas of the planet. If the pulsing of electromagnetic waves corresponds to frequencies of human brain activities, the electromagnetic frequencies produced by electrical currents in the ionosphere will influence the functioning of brains of whole populations.

In 1994 the USA started building the system using the same principles, but producing greater energies called HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program). On the building of the system HAARP   wrote a son of the former Alaskan senator Nick Begich together with the journalist Jeane Manning a book entitled “Angels Don’t Play this HAARP“. In their book they described all the possible military uses of the HAARP system.

Though Europe was used to not opposing USA politics, in this case it became alarmed and invited Nick Begich to testify in the European Parliament on the HAARP system. As a result of his testimony the European Parliament approved, on January 28th, 1999, a resolution number A4-0005/1999 on Environment Protection and Security and Foreign Affairs.

In the resolution the European Parliament called „on the European Union to seek to have the new ‘non-lethal’ weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions“, declared that it

“considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing“.

It expressed its regret over

“the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP program currently being funded in Alaska“.

Finally it called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” See this. (item 30).

In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya (Today) published the article “Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse“. The largest part of the article was dedicated to “psychotronic“ weapons, thus suggesting that Russians were aware of the possible use of the HAARP system for the control of the brain activity of the Russian population. It said:

“It is necessary to admit that our potential adversary is presenting us all grounds to talk about ‘psychotronic‘ or ‘psychic‘ weapon as a fact which we have to consider to be real… The point is that the non-lethal weapon,  which is being developed in Los Alamos, is, according to Russian military classification, tightly connected with so -called ‘information weapon’… such a weapon is capable to affect not only the soldiers of the adversary… but the whole population of the country“.

The article in the daily Segodnya described Russian reactions to the findings of the FAPSI agency at the international as well as national level. On the international level the State Duma and then Inter Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed in 1997 the United Nations, OBSE and European Council, with a proposal to introduce the  international convention on the ban of information wars and restriction of circulation of the information weapon. According to the article the Russian initiative went so far that in March 1998 the issue was discussed at the meeting with the Secretary General of the UN Kofi Anan and at the initiative of Russia was included in the agenda of the Assembly General of the UN. Apparently this Russian effort was put to a stop by the unwillingness of the USA  and its allies from NATO to join the international convention.

The Russian Department of Defense and the Russian government also reacted to the threat. The Commission on Military Construction included means of information war among the three priority factors of the country’s potential to fight against the possible aggression from the outside. The daily  Segodnya wrote that mysterious means of information-psychological effects are fully capable not only to impair the health,  but to also cause “blocking, on subconscious level, of  the freedom of will of a human being, loss of ability of  political, cultural and other self identification of a human being, manipulation of societal consciousness” and even “destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual space of RF” [Russian Federation]. See this.

In 2019 the Chinese daily China Morning Post wrote that  China tested the Russian system Sura and that the American system HAARP is capable of generating 4 times higher energy than the Russian system Sura. As a result of those tests China started building its own more advanced radar system with possible military use in  Sanja, in province Hajnan, which could manipulate the ionosphere  over the whole South China sea. It also wrote that according to some critics, those systems are capable of influencing the activity of human brains, see this.

If world superpowers were interested in defending the freedom of human mind and thinking, they would have to organize an international agreement banning the development and use of any systems enabling remote control of the human nervous system and human brain activity.

To make such an agreement possible, they would have, as well, to agree that they will stop the competition to acquire military control of the world.

Russia evidently can not accept such an agreement for as long as the USA is surrounding its territory by military bases and China is in the same situation, when American navy is operating in the South China sea. This American military pressure against China and Russia justifies, in the eyes of part of Russian and Chinese citizens, the lack of democracy in those countries.

The Russia radar system Sura, just like American system HAARP,  and in the future the Chinese system, are or will be able to eradicate inhabitants of large areas of our planet, but such use may not be necessary.  It will be satisfactory to gain control of people’s thinking in those areas.

To achieve  the same effect it should be possible to add pulses in brain frequencies to transmissions of cell phone networks.  Recently the U.S. Department of Defense searched for speakers at the conference, where military use of the fifth generation of cell phone technology should be discussed, see this. It is not by accident that the USA warned their allies against the use of HUAWEI technology.

They evidently know what all it can be used for. In the sixth generation of cell phone systems  it is planned to connect human brains to the internet. Already the omnipresence of the signals of the fifth generation should alarm people.  In October 2018 a scientist from the American military research agency DARPA  James Giordano told in a lecture to cadets that his agency produced nanomaterial, which can be aerosolized and when breathed in, penetrate the human brain and make it more susceptible to manipulation by pulsed microwaves (watch the video below from 37:16). Such a possibility was already disclosed in an article by The Huffington Post in October 2017. In this article the scientists predicted that this technology will be produced within 2 to 5 years.

If the world politicians or actual rulers will not manage to control the lust for power as a basic principle of their activity, we can expect that a new electronical totalitarian power will be established in the world, which will be impossible to „vote out“ or overthrow, because people will not be able to even think about it.

In 1994 the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College published a study ”Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, where possible use of this technology was described: ”Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated computerized personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each”, see this.

On September 30, 2021 the senate in Chile approved a law establishing the right to personal identity, free will, and mental privacy for Chilean citizens. The Chilean senator Giulio Girardi said “the law is to protect ‘the last frontier’ of the human being: the human psyche“ see this. As well the initiator of this legislation Chilean scientist Rafael Yuste advocated at the United Nations  to add five “NeuroRights” in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, see this. Those are the good news.

The bad news is that  big media around the world did not inform about those events, thus keeping in secret the technologies that the governments have at hand. Under such circumstances the willingness of the world governments to reach an agreement banning the use  of those technologies against people, remains questionable for as long as people will not oblige them to do it.

*

Mojmir Babacek is the founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means. He is the author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation. 

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image is from Graphene Flagship

Israel News: “The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people” due to “immuno-erosion”

Compilation of Israel news clips shows they are questioning the “vaccine” efficacy.

Because it’s important to also get outside perspective when dealing with a situation of this magnitude, and because we cannot rely on American news sources to accurately portray the events around us, I wanted to highlight the following compilation that was created using Israeli news clips and whom someone has graciously translated and subtitled with English captions.

And although many of us already know about the ineffectiveness of the so-called “vaccines” and may have already heard about the news coming from Israel about the vaccines waning over time, the following clips gives us a bird’s eye view of how their news media is handling the information.

Due to the many different clips and my unfamiliarity with following Israel’s news and the Hebrew language, I cannot determine the dates (if they were from days/weeks/months ago) or the legitimacy of what has been translated. I have read comments confirming that the subtitles are correct, and I have also read comments stating “If Israel says anything, it is a lie.” I am also unfamiliar if the Israeli news stations has similar motives as the United States mainstream media – in which, as research has indicated, is to promote certain narratives/propaganda and to cause division and chaos.

So please take everything into account and do not just believe everything you read, see and hear.

There is also the confusing nature of ongoing booster shots apparently scheduled for the people in Israel, and one has to question the decision-making in these matters seeing as how if the vaccines didn’t work the first time, or second time, or third time around… – what makes anyone believe that continuous ineffective “booster” shots will be any better? For all of what? 2-3 months of maybe mediocre “protection” until another booster is needed? It would seem the best way forward would be to denounce these dangerous “gene-therapy” tools, and seek alternative/repairing medicines instead and build up on natural immunity which many studies have proven to be far more effective than any vaccine. (But I digress…)

Lastly, I do want to send a huge thank you to hasifot@telegram for compiling the clips and whomever translated/subtitled them to English in case it was a different person/group. With anything of this type of endeavor, it takes a lot of time and effort to create, and I appreciate the work that has gone into it. Many, many thanks.

1st Clip: “In this wave we’re seeing infection and illness in vaccinated individuals. We’re seeing vaccinated individuals that are… sick… and arrive at the hospitals in serious condition… And we’re seeing deaths as well!

The increase in the number of seriously ill, who have been vaccinated, is an increase that we have seen over the past few days very significantly.”

@00:25: 2nd Clip:The almost vast majority of the deceased are vaccinated people, that seemingly have gone through… “immuno-erosion”… 83 dead just in the past month.”

@00:35: 3rd Clip: “At the same time, in addition to this number that we see on the screen, there are also 15 sick that are in serious condition.”

@00:42: 4th Clip: “Let’s admit the truth. At the moment we don’t really know. Because, as Bennett himself said in his opening statement, “We don’t have anyone to learn from, we’re the only country that is vaccinated to such an extent. In the entire world this is a completely novel challenge. And therefore we must gather just a bit more data, and then decide.” 

@00:57: 5th Clip: “I today don’t see a difference. Really, I don’t see a difference. Between if I, as someone that has been vaccinated with two doses, got sick so, so badly. So what does it matter if you take the vaccines or not?”

@01:08: 6th Clip: “Certainly it is starting to bother us.”

@01:11: 7th Clip – Speaker 1: “Meanwhile we are becoming aware of the fact that the Director General of the Sheba Hospital, Professor Yitzhak Kreiss, he was, if you recall, the third person to get vaccinated (in Israel), after the Prime Minister and Minister of Health. He also has become sick with COVID despite being vaccinated.

Do you have a clear position, Professor, regarding what they call the “boost”? That is, an additional dose, which we must say, is still not to be found in Pfizer’s protocols.”

Speaker 2: We must say, decisively, even, that there isn’t any medical basis, as of today, for massive and bulk vaccination of the population with a third vaccine, with a booster. We really are not at the point in time that we need to vaccinate the bulk of the population with a third dose.”

@01:56: 8th Clip – Speaker 1: “Yesterday, around eight in the evening, the Health Ministry published data seemingly about a decline in the efficacy of the vaccine. And that’s, at the very least, a bit strange…”

Speaker 2: “Yes, it’s a bit strange. In general the Health Ministry isn’t exceptional in sharing information, isn’t exceptional in sharing data with the public. And that’s a matter that… – “

Speaker 3: “By the way, what about the transparency of the “Corona Cabinet”? All of the Ministers of the Cabinet promised us, they fought for it during the previous administration.”

[undetermined who is speaking at this time but it appears as if it is Speaker 2]: “Yes, “we’ll publish the protocols”, okay, so, on with it!

30 years (of confidentiality), what’s the big deal? So where do we see it happening? We’re in favor of the protocols being published, and we’re especially in favor of much more data from the Health Ministry.”

Off-camera speaker: “But they came out against this secrecy, now they (the new government) are there and they’re continuing with the secrecy!”

Speaker 3: “No, now there’s really state secrets. We have to make sure that the virus doesn’t find out! (jokingly) If the coronavirus finds out what we’re going to do, it will… you know…”

Speaker 2:There is very problematic conduct in the data of the Health Ministry.

This week, in response to our request, they gave us the breakdown of the seriously ill into vaccinated and non-vaccinated. They’ve promised us that starting next week it will be published on a regular basis.

I’m waiting to see. Yes, there is a very significant discrepancy between the data of the studies done in Israel on the efficacy of the vaccine versus those published in Britain and in the United States. Especially pertaining to infection. Because according to the study that was conducted here in Israel, the efficacy against infection fell to 40%, the efficacy of the vaccine. And really, many questions arise how we’ve arrived at such a low number. Even though, like Arad said…”

@03:09: 9th Clip: “Most of the patients right now, are vaccinated, obviously.”

@03:13: 10th Clip: “And the funniest thing is that we ask them. “Okay, I got infected. But before she did the test, I got infected, you informed me that I’m sick with COVID. What happens with her?”

So, they ask me on the phone: “Did she get vaccinated?”

I told her, “Yes, we both got vaccinated.”

“No problem, she doesn’t need to quarantine, she can travel freely.”

Okay, so she was going around freely. And now a few days later we did a test again and she’s positive. What happened during that time that she was going around outside?”

We have to realize, no matter what race we are, no matter what nationality we are, we are all human beings that deserve the truth and the morality of being treated with dignity and respect. As it is, it seems that ALL OF US, across ALL countries, have been lied to, save for the corrupt individuals/institutions that are running this program. There is no doubt that a criminal conspiracy is in the works, and it all points to a “one world government” / “great reset” agenda.

Why the huge demand to get “EVERYONE” vaccinated? The full scope and true motives are still unclear, but one thing is certain: it is not for everyone’s “health and safety”. But perhaps it is for “their” safety. Those that are familiar with the organizations involved, may know/speculate of who “they” are; often referred to as the “elite”, “deep state”, freemasons, “global leaders”, etc.

Now the question is, will we allow their stranglehold on our freedoms and rights to continue? Or will we finally stand up and say, “I do not comply.”?

I, for one, and I’m sure in the sea of many, WILL NOT COMPLY.

Many blessings to all, and once again, many thanks to those involved in the creation of this compilation.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Alexandra_Koch from Pixabay