Major hospital systems have had to reevaluate their coercive COVID-19 jab policies after crucial employees, especially nurses, have opted to quit rather than get the experimental injections.
Facing serious staffing shortages, some of the largest and most prominent hospital systems in the United States, including HCA Healthcare Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corp., AdventHealth, and Cleveland Clinic have been forced to backpedal on their COVID-19 jab mandates in hopes of retaining crucial employees, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday
Townhall reported that University Hospitals in the Cleveland, Ohio area also recently announced the reversal of its jab mandate for hospital workers.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the major hospital systems have been forced to reevaluate their coercive COVID-19 jab policies after needed healthcare industry employees, especially nurses, chose to quit rather than get the experimental injections.
Some big hospital systems have dropped vaccine mandates after a judge blocked a Biden administration requirement for healthcare workers to get shots https://t.co/uKOMcw3P58
“Vaccine mandates have been a factor constraining the supply of healthcare workers, according to hospital executives, public-health authorities and nursing groups,” the report noted, adding that “thousands of nurses have left the industry or lost their jobs rather than get vaccinated” for COVID-19.
The staggering percentage of healthcare workers who have refused to comply with the jab requirements imposed by their hospital systems — many of whom are vitally necessary nursing personnel — could have a crippling effect on America’s hospitals if the establishments move to fire all noncompliant workers.
Recognizing this dilemma, an employee-benefits lawyer has suggested that hospitals that don’t mandate the jabs could see an influx of interested applicants fleeing hospitals with more coercive policies.
“It’s been a mass exodus, and a lot of people in the healthcare industry are willing to go and shop around,” Wade Symons, head of the consulting firm Mercer’s U.S. regulatory practice, told the Journal.
“If you get certain healthcare facilities that don’t require it, those could be a magnet for those people who don’t want the vaccine. They’ll probably have an easier time attracting labor,” Symons said.
News of the major hospital systems dropping their injection mandates comes after a federal judge in Louisiana blocked the Biden administration’s top-down federal COVID-19 jab mandate for healthcare workers that would have impacted at least 10 million Americans.
The judge’s late-November decision was in response to President Joe Biden’s September 9 announcement of a series of vaccine mandates for public and private sectors, including one with no testing option for millions of healthcare workers employed by medical facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has subsequently announced it will temporarily halt enforcement of its healthcare worker mandate pending appeal of a federal injunction blocking the measure.
“I don’t think the mandates were helpful and I think the court in Louisiana did everyone a service,” Alan Levine, chief executive officer of Ballad Health, told TheJournal.
Levine, who told the newspaper his company employs about 14,000 people, of whom roughly 2,000 have opted not to get the shot, said firing “[t]hat many people … would have been devastating to our system.”
States, companies, and private individuals have filed a raft of lawsuits taking issue not only with the mandate for healthcare workers but also the mandate for federal contractors and another for businesses with 100 or more employees.
In early November, a federal court blocked the mandate for large businesses, just two days after it was published. The mandate would have used the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to impose massive fines on noncompliant companies and individuals for failing to get the experimental shots.
By early December, all three of the Biden administration’s private sector jab mandates were stalled by federal judges.
BREAKING: Federal court blocks the Biden vax mandate for federal contractors. Biden is 0 for 3 on unconstitutional mandates! Freedom is winning! pic.twitter.com/yRZj8g2Wy8
The latest mandate to be blocked was halted December 7 by a federal judge who sided with South Carolina’s attorney general and Republican governor and stopped the Biden administration’s COVID-19 jab mandate for federal contractors, freezing the requirement nationwide and marking the third federal injection mandate to be blocked across all 50 states.
A shift in public policy toward the reversal of coercive jab mandates comes as many Americans remain concerned that the experimental drugs on the market have not been sufficiently studied for negative effects given their accelerated clinical trials. Many also harbor serious moral reservations about the use of cells from aborted babies in the development of the shots.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
More than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and more long-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot
Lawsuits challenge vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection
Todd Zywicki, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia, sued over the school’s vaccine mandate, which did not recognize natural immunity. The school settled out of court, granting Zywicki a medical exemption. They did not, however, change their general policy to recognize other staff and students who have natural immunity
Some of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Rutgers University in New Jersey also object to the vaccine mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit is still pending
Since COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus, and COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals, the argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply falls apart
While governments around the world are going full steam ahead with plans for vaccine passports, two key things have occurred that blow irreparable holes in the whole argument.
First, more than 15 studies now show the natural immunity you get after recovering from COVID-19 is far superior and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot, and secondly, lawsuits have challenged vaccine requirements that fail to accept natural immunity as an alternative to the COVID injection. Other lawsuits highlighting the illegalities of vaccine mandates have also been filed.
The Zywicki Case
As reported by the New York Post,1 August 4, 2021, when George Mason University in Virginia decided to implement a vaccine mandate, law professor Todd Zywicki sued.2 Mason recovered from COVID-19 in 2020 and has natural immunity, as demonstrated by several antibody tests. One of his attorneys, Harriet Hageman, stated:
“Common sense and medical science should underpin GMU’s actions. Both have gone missing with this latest effort to force a distinguished professor to take a vaccine that he does not need — not for his own protection nor for anyone else’s safety at Scalia Law School.”
The lawsuit pointed out that people with natural immunity have an increased risk of adverse reactions to the COVID shot — according to one study3 up to 4.4 times the risk of clinically significant side effects — and that the requirement not only violates due process rights and the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, but is not compliant with the Emergency Use Authorization.4
A Win for GMU Professor but No Legal Precedent
August 17, 2021, George Mason University caved before the case went to trial and granted Zywicki a medical exemption to the vaccine requirement.5 Unfortunately, and irrationally, the school did not revise its general policy. As reported by Citizens Journal:6
“The school’s acknowledgment of natural immunity is significant given the serial case of amnesia that seems to have overtaken the world on this basic point of biology.
However, the school still maintains the vaccination requirement for all other members of the GMU community, regardless of naturally acquired immunity. At the time of this writing, the same medical exemption has not been offered on a broader scale.
Furthermore, the lawsuit would have served as an interesting test case for vaccine mandate-related litigation, which will become more prevalent as time goes on. Regardless, the victory still serves as a sliver of hope that some universities will entertain reasonable arguments and that individuals can fight back with litigation …
With the GMU case resolved without trial, many critical legal arguments went untested. For example, does the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause apply to vaccine mandates, or does the state have the ability to suspend such rights when responding to a public health emergency?
How does the reliability of natural immunity affect the constitutionality of policies that fail to recognize it? Can the government simply cherry-pick whatever science it wants to justify its policies? According to the court filing,7
‘The Supreme Court has recognized that the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to privacy. A ‘forcible injection … into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]’ Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990).’
Given this precedent, as well as the state’s police powers to suspend individual rights under compelling circumstances, how will this apply to Covid-19 in a low-risk environment such as a college campus?
If the right still holds, how will it apply to city-wide vaccine passport programs, given that Covid-19 is a relatively mild disease? … The move is also mysterious, given the relevance of the matter. As a result, it did not create a binding legal precedent.”
In a statement, lead counsel Jenin Younes with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, said:8
“NCLA is pleased that GMU granted Professor Zywicki’s medical exemption, which we believe it only did because he filed this lawsuit. According to GMU, with the medical exemption, Prof. Zywicki may continue serving the GMU community, as he has for more than two decades, without receiving a medically unnecessary vaccine and without undue burden.
Nevertheless, NCLA remains dismayed by GMU’s refusal — along with many other public and private universities and other employers — to recognize that the science establishes beyond any doubt that natural immunity is as robust or more so than vaccine immunity.”
Other Lawsuits Challenging Schools’ Vaccine Mandates
While not specifically centered around the validity of natural immunity, a lawsuit filed by more than a dozen students and Children’s Health Defense against Rutgers University in New Jersey does include this aspect, as some of the plaintiffs object to the mandate on the basis that they have natural immunity. This lawsuit was filed in mid-August 20219 and is still pending.
Earlier this year, in April 2021, the Los Angeles Unified School District was sued over its vaccine requirement by California Educators for Medical Freedom and the Health Freedom Defense Fund.10July 27, a California court dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, as it concluded the LAUSD had voluntarily abandoned its mandatory vaccine requirement. As reported by The Defender:11
“This is a BIG win — because of the lawsuit, LAUSD represented to the court on the record that it does not have a policy requiring vaccination with EUA products. Since the court has now confirmed the absence of any policy requiring vaccination at LAUSD, all teachers and staff are safe to return to work without vaccination or furnishing proof of vaccination in the fall.”
Time will tell if the Children’s Health Defense case against Rutgers University will bring the legal precedent needed to more effectively thwart this tyrannical trend. Still, even smaller wins like Zywicki’s are important and demonstrate there are ways we can fight back, if only we’re willing.
While vaccine passports are immoral and unconstitutional in and of themselves, medical science is also proving them useless and irrational. As reported by Daniel Horowitz in an August 25, 2021, article in The Blaze,12 there are at least 15 studies that show natural immunity from previous infection is more robust and longer-lasting than what you get from the COVID shot. He writes:
“The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC’s campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all version of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.
It’s time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.”
We now have data showing vaccine immunity rapidly wanes regardless of variants, but especially when a new variant becomes predominant. According to the Mayo Clinic, as of July 2021, Pfizer’s COVID injection was only 42% effective against infection,13 which doesn’t even meet the Food and Drug Administration’s requirement of 50% efficacy14 for COVID vaccines.
This matches Israeli data, which show Pfizer’s shot went from a 95% effectiveness at the outset, to 64% in early July 2021 and 39% by late July, when the Delta strain became predominant.15,16 Pfizer’s own trial data also demonstrate rapidly waning effectiveness. BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi discussed this in an August 23, 2021, blog.17
By the fifth month into the trial, efficacy had dropped from 96% to 84%, and this drop could not be due to the emergence of the Delta variant since 77% of trial participants were in the U.S., where the Delta variant didn’t emerge until months later. So, even without a predominance of a new variant, effectiveness drops off. In an August 20, 2021, report, BPR noted:18
“‘The data we will publish today and next week demonstrate the vaccine effectiveness against SARS COVID 2 infection is waning,’ the CDC director [Rochelle Walensky] began … She cited reports of international colleagues, including Israel ‘suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early’ …
‘In the context of these concerns, we are planning for Americans to receive booster shots starting next month to maximize vaccine induced protection. Our plan is to protect the American people and to stay ahead of this virus,’ Walensky shared …
The CDC director appears to all but admit that the vaccine’s efficacy rate has a strict time limit, and its protections are limited in the ever-changing environment.”
You’re Far Safer Around a Naturally Immune Person
Add to this a) the fact that the COVID shots do not prevent infection or spread of the virus and b) the fact that COVID-jabbed individuals carry the same viral load when symptomatic as unvaccinated individuals,19,20 and the whole argument that vaccine passports will identify and separate “public health threats” from those who are “safe” to be around simply fails miserably.
As noted by Horowitz, anyone capable of rational thought understands that a person with natural immunity from a previous infection is “exponentially safer to be around than someone who had the vaccines but not prior infection.”21
As for the unvaccinated who do not have natural immunity from prior infection, well, their status poses no increased risk to anyone but themselves. Conversely, since the COVID shot cannot prevent infection or transmission, and only promises to reduce your risk of serious illness, the only one who can benefit from the shot is the one who got it. It protects no one else.
In fact, you may actually pose an increased risk to others, because if your symptoms are mild or nonexistent, but your viral load high, you’re more likely to walk around as usual. Rather than staying home because you suspect you’re infected and infectious, you’re out spreading the virus around to others, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.
What Does the Research Say?
In his article, Horowitz reviews 15 studies that should, once and for all, settle the debate about whether people who have had COVID are now immune and whether that immunity is comparable to that of the COVID shots. Here’s a select handful of those studies. For the rest, please see the original Blaze article.22
Immunity May 202123— New York University researchers concluded that while both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination elicit potent immune responses, the immunity you get when you’ve recovered from natural infection is more durable and quicker to respond.
The reason for this is because natural immunity conveys more innate immunity involving T cells and antibodies, whereas vaccine-induced immunity primarily stimulates adaptive immunity involving antibodies.
Nature May 202124— This research dispels fears that SARS-CoV-2 infection might not produce long-lasting immunity. Even in people with mild COVID-19 infection, whose anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibodies levels might rapidly decline in the months’ post-recovery, persistent and long-lived bone marrow plasma cells start churning out new antibodies when the virus is encountered a second time.
According to the authors, “Consistently, circulating resting memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 S were detected in the convalescent individuals. Overall, our results indicate that mild infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans.”
Nature July 202025— The Nature findings above support findings from Singapore published in July 2020, which found patients who had recovered from SARS in 2002/2003 had robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 17 years later.
Cell Medicine July 202126— Here, they found that most previously infected patients produced durable antibodies and memory B cells, along with durable polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells that target multiple parts of the virus.
According to the authors: “Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.” The same clearly cannot be said for vaccine-induced immunity.
BioRxiv July 202127— Echoing the Cell Medicine findings above, University of California researchers concluded that “Natural infection induced expansion of larger CD8 T cell clones occupied distinct clusters, likely due to the recognition of a broader set of viral epitopes presented by the virus not seen in the mRNA vaccine.”
If natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced antibodies, you’d expect to see fewer reinfections among those who have already had COVID-19, compared to breakthrough infections occurring among those who got the COVID shot. And that’s precisely what we see.
In a preprint titled “Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Previously Infected Individuals,”28 the researchers looked at reinfection rates among previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system.
Of the 1,359 frontline workers with natural immunity from previous infection, not a single one was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic, despite heavy exposure to COVID-19-positive patients.
A second preprint,29 posted August 25, 2021, compared SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity by looking at reinfection and breakthrough rates. Four outcomes were evaluated: SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic disease, COVID-19-related hospitalization and death.
Results showed that, compared to those with natural immunity, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received a two-dose regimen of Pfizer’s COVID shot had:30
A 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection
A 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease
A 13.06-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant
A higher risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations
After adjusting for comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had received two Pfizer doses were 27.02 times more likely to experience symptomatic breakthrough infection than those with natural immunity.31 No deaths were reported in either of the groups. In closing the authors concluded:32
“This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.”
Majority of Hospitalizations Are Actually in the Vaccinated
The oft-repeated refrain is that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” meaning those who have not received the COVID jab make up the bulk of those hospitalized and dying from the Delta variant. However, we’re already seeing a shift in hospitalization rates from the unvaccinated to those who have gotten one or two injections.
For example, in Israel, the fully “vaccinated” made up the bulk of serious cases and COVID-related deaths in July 2021, as illustrated in the graphs below.33 The red is unvaccinated, yellow refers to partially “vaccinated” and green fully “vaccinated” with two doses. By mid-August, 59% of serious cases were among those who had received two COVID injections.34
Data from the U.K. show a similar trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID deaths.35
Data36 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also refute the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative. Between July 6,2021, and July 25, 2021, 469 COVID cases were identified in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, outbreak.
Of those who tested positive, 74% had received two COVID injections and were considered “fully vaccinated.” Even despite using different diagnostic standards for non-jabbed and jabbed individuals, a whopping 80% of COVID-related hospitalizations were also in this group.37,38
COVID Shot May Harm Immunity in Those Previously Infected
While the authors of that August 25, 2021, preprint39 claim in their abstract that “Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant,” in the body of the article they admit they “could not demonstrate significance in our cohort.”
Unless significance is demonstrated, the finding is basically irrelevant, so I would not rely on this paper if I wanted to argue for vaccination of those with preexisting natural immunity. Besides, there’s research40 showing the COVID shots may actually harm the superior T cell immunity built up from prior infection, especially after the second dose. As reported by Horowitz in The Blaze:41
“Immunologists from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid have raised serious concerns. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found ‘in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response.’
They also note that other research has shown ‘the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals.’”
Arguments for Vaccine Passports Are Null and Void
FEE.org reported the August 25 findings under the headline, “Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished”:42
“Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory, since they disproportionately affect working class individuals.
‘Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,’ Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter …
Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people over a respiratory virus in this manner.
Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations. People who have had COVID already have significantly more protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated.
Meanwhile, people who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only themselves at risk.”
While we still have a long and likely hard fight ahead of us, there is reason to be optimistic. In a recent TikTok video,43 a young man named Ari Hasanaj who lives in New York City describes how he printed up posters that say:
“We do not discriminate against ANY customer based on sex, gender, race, creed, age, vaccinated or unvaccinated. All customers who wish to patronize are welcome in our establishment.”
He then went around the city, from one store to the next, asking each owner if they would agree to post the sign on their door to protest NYC’s vaccine passport requirement. A majority said yes. He is now asking others to join him in this effort.
In Denmark, vaccine passports will no longer be used to restrict movement as of September 10, 2021. The health minister, Magnus Heunicke, has stated, though, that the passport system may be reinstated if rising infection rates threaten important functions.
Denmark was among the first to announce the development of a digital vaccine passport, which came into effect in April 2021.44 For months, Danes repeatedly demonstrated against the COVID passes, and it seems the protests eventually had the desired effect. It just goes to show that if enough people resist, tyrannical overreach can be reined in.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
“This is NOT a vaccine.” / “This is a poisonous attack on our population.”
Numerous doctors and healthcare workers have been speaking out against the egregious vaccine narrative that has overrun our planet.
However, there has been a huge censorship and banning of these alternative opinions/accounts that are trying to prevent these important voices from being heard on the social media platforms or on mainstream media. Facebook, twitter, youtube, instagram… known for silencing this crucial information because it creates a form of “vaccine hesitancy”, using the pretense of a “deadly virus” as their excuse, has initiated a totalitarian stance in their push to mandate these vaccines to the whole population, and has largely banned many dissenting opinions, facts, or even basic discussion regarding the vaccines and its efficacy.
Meanwhile, the efforts to hire influencers and celebrities to endorse these vaccines have reached an outrageous precedent, and the continued effort to FUND THESE INDIVIDUALS, who are NOT EXPERTS, to speak so highly of an experimental vaccine, while DISMISSING ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS, should tell you everything you need to know about the safety of these vaccines.
I honestly wish I didn’t have to spell it out, but the dishonest tactics and malfeasance that has gone on within the government, health industries, and media/big tech collusions has reached a terrifying height, and their oppressive attempts at restricting not just rational/irrational conversations, but individuals’ OWN PERSONAL TESTIMONIES, has overstepped a dangerous boundary that looms ever closer to a dystopian society in which any form of dissenting opinion is attacked, criticized, and silenced.
Thankfully though, we continue to have several ACTUAL EXPERTS and HONEST CITIZENS coming to the forefront and offering their knowledge and experience with what they’ve seen during the COVID pandemic.
This post will cover two gentlemen: Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Dan Stock. As I have done in the past, I provide transcriptions of videos in order for people to have the ability to read the text in case that is a preferred method for them. It is also helpful in order to search for specific key words that the reader may be looking for.
Dr. Dan Stock at the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana
[All quotes by Dan Stock, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]
“Dr. Dan Stock, 5777 West 700 North, Mccordsville, Indiana.
To address your comment, geez, it’s hard to believe we’re 18 months into this and still having a problem, and I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.
I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. And that means that I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation, and everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.
So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses. They are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask, by the way. The literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we’ve presented to you has been given to the secretary.
As a matter of fact, it quotes at least 3 studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.
That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.
And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did small pox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we’re able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncitial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done.
Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health, ‘why were you doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncitial virus?’
And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective, having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that? And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called ‘antibody mediated viral enhancement’. That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in EVERY coronavirus study done in animals, on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak, and done in respiratory syncitial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which by – cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become WORSE than it would with native infection.
And that is why you’re seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you and in the emails with 6 extra, there’ll be a study showing that 75% of people who had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak, were FULLY vaccinated. [audience applauds]
Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that NO vaccine, even the ones that I support and would give to myself and my children, EVER stops infection.
In 2014, there was outbreaks of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who are unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines. But a question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had NO contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual: ‘where did they get the disease?’ And the answer was, from the VACCINATED individuals.
No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do they very thing you’re wanting them to do.
And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance, and instead read the articles that are going to come in the email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counter factual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that is supposedly was gonna make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID-19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.
By the way, the other thing that would be necessary any vaccine and restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over fifteen COVID-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D, Ivermectin, and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital. And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than 55, your risk of COVID-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.
So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination AT ALL. No reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization, and suffer 2-4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.
Therefore the policies that you are basing on are totally counter factual. I don’t blame this board for that, ’cause I know you aren’t scientists and you’ve thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive.
And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually if you would like to explain the science behind this, and if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free pro-bono expert testimony at your disposal. [audience applauds] I will testify in defense of this board turning down all these recommendations for free, at any time, in any court. Thank you.”
[All quotes by Ryan Cole, with some embellishment added to highlight pertinent information.]
“Howdy howdy. I’m Dr. Cole. It’s an honor to be here with my colleagues. Some brilliant minds as you’ve already seen. So I’m humbled to be on this stage with them. I’m excited to be here with attorneys that fight for freedom as well. And it’s fantastic to be in a room with smiling faces not covered with unnecessary cloth that does nothing. [audience applauds] So…
So who is this random doctor on stage?
I’m Dr. Ryan Cole, I’m a male clinic trained, board-certified, anatomic pathologist, clinical pathologist, dermatopathologist, way too many years at school. Also did some phD research in immunology. So immunology/virology is right up my alley. So, if you want mechanisms of action and how things work and what not, go ahead and pick my brain.
Anyway, so what about the vaccine and what about deaths? You know, Dr. Urso had alluded to that, that we have some concerns about these high numbers. What’s going on?
You know, we see the headlines, like Dr. Merritt mentioned: 13 year old, 3 days after a shot, dies. 15 year old dies of a heart attack, you know, 10 children so far in the VAERS reports, probably more now. Death after heart attacks. 39 year old mom of 3, death after the shot, etc., etc., etc. So we see the headlines.
So here’s the question. One would think in this era of a new virus and a new experimental… – I don’t even like calling it a vaccine – an investigational vaccine [audience member: “A fake vaccine!”] A fake vaccine. Okay. I can… a “clot shot”, a “needle rape”, whatever you want to call it [audience members laugh] – um, okay. So, going to the VAERS data, um… 11,000 deaths. 12,000 deaths. 45,000 deaths.
In the literature so far, about a month ago, “First Post Vaccine Autopsy”. Out of 11,000 deaths?! Are you KIDDING me? Is this science anymore? No! No, “medical technocracy”. “Fear, suffering, shot. Fear, suffering, shot. That’s all you’re supposed to have. Listen to us and that’s all you get.”
So how can we do science, if we’re not looking? One cannot find that, for which they do not look. Where is the funding?
And the independent pathologists – pathology, you know, I do a lot of biopsies, cancer diagnostics, what not, we never complain about getting too much tissue. Well, when you get the autopsy you get all the tissue. But guess what? You find all the answers, too. But if we’re not looking, we’re not going to find it. And if they’re saying, “Well, don’t autopsy that. It wasn’t the vaccine. These are not the droids you’re looking for. Don’t look here.” [audience laughs]
So, how, how on God’s green Earth are we going to know? Where is the funding? Autopsies are expensive, yes. But if we have billions to advertise a clot shot to children that don’t need it… Dr. Fauci, where’s the funding for science? [loud applause]
Okay. When an unapproved new drug therapy vaccine is put onto the market, well you need to use the French legal system. Guilty until proven innocent. So, IF there’s an adverse reaction, IF there’s a death, it happened from that therapy, until you prove that it didn’t. And we’re doing the “Look the other way, look the other way. Follow the money.”
Who’s behind this? I don’t know. I’m not going to conspiracy theory anything. I’m not going to be political, but I’m saying if you want the data, then you need to use that French legal system, say, “This is guilty until we prove it didn’t happen from something else.” And we’re doing just the opposite right now.
Okay, what about the spike protein? We’re giving a sequence, a gene sequence, into the bodies of human beings. And the sequence goes into our deltoid and we’re informed that it has a little anchoring protein and once that is translated and makes a little protein and it’s on the surface of your cell it stays there. Well, guess what? It doesn’t. And there are studies, and of course, the “fact-checkers” are “Oh, this isn’t true. This isn’t true.” – I’m a scientist. Don’t ask the journalists, ask the scientist. Okay?
So this spike protein doesn’t stay just in the deltoid, the spike circulates in your blood, it lands in multiple organs in the body. And you know what happens? That spike protein, without the body of the virus present, we did studies in lab animals; in the lab animals, just in injecting the spike, with no body of the virus, the spike induced the same disease as COVID-19 induced. The same lung disease. The same vascular disease. The same heart disease. The same brain disease. The spike is the toxin. So again, why are we injecting something into the human body that IS the toxin? It IS the toxin. It CAUSES the disease. This isn’t a vaccine! [audience applauds]
@5:25 : Okay, so we know that the virus who everybody’s heard about, this ACE2 receptor, here’s an example. So on the left hand side, this is a – one of the cells that lines your blood vessels – I’ll show you a chart in a minute, where we have ACE2 receptors. So on the left hand side you see a kind of in the corner of that upper grid and that bottom grid, these nice smooth lines. On the right hand side, this is what the spike protein – just the spike alone, from the vaccine, is doing to the mitochondria, your cells, that’s the engine of your cells. That’s what gives you energy, the power of your cells.
Compare the left: the smooth, nice, put together; compare the right: blown apart, fragmented. That’s from the VACCINE. Not from the virus. From the vaccine.
@6:08 : Okay, so here’s the human body. You can see the plethora of sites where we have ACE2 receptors. Now think about it. I mentioned, they tell us, “Oh gosh, the spike stays in your deltoid.” It doesn’t. It circulates. In the Harvard study in 13 nurses, they showed it circulating for at least 2 weeks. A lot of people lacked something called mRNAs, an enzyme that breaks down the RNA, so it may be circulating for even longer.
Now you hear, well gosh, they died, you know, just so long after the shot. So, you know, it was 2 weeks, 3 weeks, Hank Aaron, whoever. You know what? That spike’s circulating. They tried to pull the wool over our eyes and say, “Well, it couldn’t have been the shot. We’re too far out.” Not if the toxin’s still circulating! Not if the toxin’s still circulating. The spike is the toxin. Damage to the lungs, like I mentioned.
@6:57 : On the left hand side, healthy lung tissue; nice, spaced out. See, this is what pathologists do. We look at all these cells all day long. That’s kind of fun. We’re nerds this way.
On the right hand side, see how much more purple and blue that is? That’s all inflammation. Why? ACE2 receptors in that lung. Spike binding to it, inflammatory response, immune system attacking your own body. Disease FROM the spike. Disease FROM your own “clot shot” / “investigational vaccine”. They keep lying to the American public by calling it a vaccine. They keep taking the word “investigational” off, it’s what they call it in the emergency authorization. They keep not calling it what it is. “Investigational”. An experiment on humanity. And that’s what they’re doing. And I’m showing you why. Spike is a toxin. It crosses the blood-brain barrier. Kind of like my brain cells to be where they are, and not be blown apart, right? [audience applauds]
So why in the world would we put a toxin into the human body that’s going to disrupt the blood vessels in your brain, allow the spike in there and cause inflammation? The brain fog you hear about the COVID patients? Guess what. You hear about it in the post-vaccinated damaged individuals as well.
“But no. Nobody’s hurt by the shot. There’s not been one death. There’s not been one injury.” That’s what they tell you. It’s a lie. And this is science.
@8:15 [slides presented]: Okay, here we go. That’s – all the blue on top, those are brain cells, all the blue doesn’t belong there. That’s inflammation from the spike.
What about the kiddos? Heart inflammation. Guess what? Blots of ACE2 receptors in the heart. And here you can see, on the left hand side, see those blue arrows around the white? That’s inflammation in the heart. That’s not normal. That’s after a shot. That’s a spike protein landing there. That’s your immune system attacking your own tissues.
See on the right, that’s the red arrows, that’s the pericardium. The sac that surrounds your heart. That’s inflammation. That doesn’t belong there.
Once you have heart damage, the heart does not heal itself.
@8:54 : Okay, left hand side, all the blue dots: inflammation. See that gray in the middle? That’s early scarring. Guess what? Once a heart cell is damaged, it’s damaged forever. It doesn’t replace itself with another heart cell. It replaces itself with a scar. So you tell me you want to give a 12 year old, a 5 year old, a 13 year old, an 18 year old, a shot? And we see about a 200 times increase in myocarditis in our society right now? “That’s a good idea, let’s give a kid a tox and ruin his heart for life.”
Stop and think about what we’re doing. Insanity. We need to stop the insanity IMMEDIATELY.
This is OVER. Game over. This is no longer good science. This is a poisonous attack on our population. And it needs to stop NOW. [audience cheers]
@9:51 [slides presented]: Kidney, same thing. Kidney’s are kind of important. Three things in life. Blood goes round and round, gotta breathe, gotta make pee. You don’t do those three things, you die. Kidney, you want to damage your kidney with a clot shot? Not a good idea either.
Liver? Kind of need your liver to detoxify everything in your life. Same thing. Damage to the liver. See all that blue? That’s inflammation. Doesn’t belong there.
Testes. Kind of important for the next generation, right? As much as that looks like a lovely heart, see all the blue in it? Inflammation.
Same thing in the ovaries. Here’s the problem. Essentially absent from the literature. What are they hiding from us?
Japanese bio-distribution study, took some doing to find this study. Dr. Bridle up in Canada, of course he was attacked for telling the truth. The lipid nanoparticle that surrounds the little mRNA they’re injecting into people’s bodies; yes, a lot of it stays in the deltoid, but it circulates as well. Guess where it likes to concentrate? A really biologically active organ. The ovary.
And, in the Pfizer paperwork and application, it clearly states that in the rats there was a 16% decrease in fertility. One of the most fertile little critter mammals on the planet. And they – “These are not the droids you’re looking for. Nevermind.”
So what’s it doing to humanity? Guess what? The answer is, we don’t know. Because we don’t have long-term safety data yet. That’s the tragedy and the crime in all of this. They’re pushing it. It’s an experiment! It’s emergency authorized. It’s not approved. We don’t – humanity is the phase 3 trial.
COVID’s a clotting disease as some of my colleagues have mentioned. After a shot, we as physicians, especially if patients complaining of post-vaccine symptoms, a d-dimer will go up when we have clots. We can’t see these clots on x-ray or scan. These are micro-clots. All these inflammatory patterns that I’m showing you, are from micro-clots as well. If we look at this in the patients, we know that they’re micro-clotting.
So this is something – Dr. Noorchashm, just like Dr. Urso mentioned – patient who has already had COVID, COVID recovered, broad beautiful immunity, they’re LYING to you to say that it’s not equal to a vaccine immunity. I love the blue pan rainbow analogy Dr. Urso gave. Screen before vaccine, there’s a multiple-fold increase risk of adverse reactions if you’ve had COVID and have recovered. You get a shot, you hyper-rev that immune system – you may be screwed. And/or dead.
All right. I’m going to reiterate, one cannot find that for which they do not look. Billions of dollars spent on advertising of, again, a toxin into the human body. Investigational vaccines, again, I will say to our agencies and our federal government, where’s the funding for real science? They don’t want you to see, what we’re seeing.
In the laboratory, I have the tissues of a dead man on the back of my desk. I have two more coming next week. Guess what? Just couple days after a shot: 50 year old, healthy triathlete. One of my favorite surgeons in town that I worked with? Second shot: mountain biking, gone.
All right. The other concern I already brought up, we have no long-term safety data. This is what we need to emphasize to society, and ask the authoritative agencies: what’s the risk for cancer after the shot? We don’t know. What’s the risk for autoimmune disease? We don’t know. What’s the risk for impairing fertility for a life-time? We don’t know. So why in the world would we willy-nilly push forward at the pace and the rate that we’re going, without knowing these things? Complete anti-science. And a complete attack on us.
No more mandatory forcing of employees – how in the world are these hospitals and these employers saying, “You can’t work for me if you don’t sign up to be a subject in an experiment on humanity.” Go back to the 1947 Nuremberg Code. We’re absolutely violating this as a nation and a people.
Where are the billions to do the autopsies? Where are the billions to prove the science? Where are the autopsies? I will go back – crickets. They’re not there.
Dismissal by the collusive media, of any adverse events or death. That’s a problem. And what happened to the concept of the “#metoo movement”? Believe everybody? What happened to “believe her”? Believe the story. What happened to “believe anyone”? Why won’t they believe the science? They won’t believe the science, they dismiss the science. What happened to this movement of “believe it until you can disprove it”? Gone. Gone.
All right. Couple side by side notes, really critically, and I’m almost out of time, what we’re seeing in the laboratory is the shots dysregulate your immune response. We have very important cells that keep other viruses in check. They keep cancers in check. There’s a type of cell called a CD8 killer t-cell. Well there’s a study out of Germany and the Netherlands that showed a shifted immune profile. And at the end, their conclusion was, we see a concerning pattern of the cells we normally need, to fight off these other things.
But the answer is, we don’t know for how long that shifted pattern lasts. It’s like having 8 blockers on the frontline – this is Texas, we talk football – having 8 blockers on the frontline and paralyzing 3 or 4 of them. But the answer is, we don’t know if they’re paralyzed for the rest of the game or the rest of their career.
And then what we see from this, in the laboratory is an uptick of herpes family viruses. Molluscum, human papillomavirus, all sorts of viruses. Mononucleosis, etc., reactivating. Reactivating at levels, and I’m a pathologist, so we see this in the laboratory and I’m seeing the early signal. Well guess what else that CD8 cell does? And some receptors on some of these t-cells called toll-like receptors, and there’s a certain pattern of them. They keep cancer in check. I have seen a 10 to 20 fold increase of uterine cancer in the last 6 months in my laboratory. And I keep data, year to year to year. In the last 6 months, when did we start the shots? January.
How much solid tumor cancer increase are we going to see over the next several years? Probably a lot. What’s the real answer? We don’t know, and sometimes that’s the most honest answer in medicine, is we don’t know.
A doctor that tells you he or she knows everything, don’t believe them. Find a new doctor.
Increase in latent viruses, etc., etc…
So anyway, I know I’m out of time for questions, thank you so much, and God bless.”
A huge thank you to these doctors and everyone else who has been speaking out against these affronts to our health, rights and freedom. These concerned, caring individuals are pointing out the corruption of the COVID/vaccine narrative, and we as a whole NEED TO LISTEN and REFUSE these unnecessary vaccines and lockdown/passport measures.
It is not about our health – as HONEST doctors/scientists/virologists/nurses, etc. around the world are exposing. If it were about our health, then proper studies and research grounded on facts would be offered, and transparency that people are suffering from an unparalleled amount of tragic side effects and death and the acknowledgement that these vaccine efforts should be STOPPED.
Instead, what we are getting are straight up LIES and COVERUPS, and an incessant push to get everyone vaccinated while disregarding the science and the dangers that these injections are imposing on the world. We are always told to “trust the science” – but “not THAT science”. Not the science that contradicts the official narrative. “Trust the scientists.” – “But not THOSE scientists.”
We need to be able to discern who has our best interest at heart – and one thing is certain: it is NOT the CDC, NIH, WHO, UN, NIAID, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WEF, paid off institutions/influencers/celebrities/politicians or anyone else who continues to endorse these vaccines.