Further Proof That Our Connection to God and Our Belief System is Under Attack: “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation – Decreased Beliefs in God, Angels and Heaven”

Has it all been boiling down to a transhumanist/one world religion this whole time?

As news of the 2005 Pentagon video detailing the FunVax/VMAT2/God Gene efforts to create a respiratory virus and/or vaccine to inhibit religious/spiritual inclinations has gained traction, there is another study that’s been done that deserves a more studious look as well.

In an article dated 2015, it seems to be piggybacking on the findings that were revealed by the FunVax Pentagon video. And strangely enough, while scientists and researchers have been finding magnetic properties inside of the COVID vaccines – and thus, transferred to humans, the title of the article gives us a disturbing look at what may be possible due to this invasive technology:

Disabling parts of the brain with magnets can weaken faith in God and change attitudes to immigrants, study finds” (October 15, 2015)

Some key notes from this article:

“A joint team of American and British scientists have discovered that powerful magnetic pulses to the brain can temporarily change people’s feelings on a variety of subjects – from their belief in God, to their attitude to immigration.”

“The two were split into two groups – one, the control group, was given a sham dose of magnetism that was not strong enough to influence brain activity.

The other got a strong pulse of TMS [Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation] that was strong enough to temporarily shut down their posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), a part of the brain that “plays a key role in both detecting discrepancies between desired and current conditions and adjusting subsequent behaviour to resolve such conflicts.”

“Amongst those who received the strong magnetic dose, 32.8 percent fewer had decreased beliefs in God, angels and heaven compared to the control group who received no dose.”

The wording is admittedly a little strange here. It can be re-worded to say, “32.8 percent less belief in God, angels and heaven”.

“Whether we’re dealing with everyday threats, such as security at work, or more abstract ones, such as the idea of God and death or the issue of immigration, our brains are using the same basic structure – and its activity can be reduced with magnetic fields.”

For me, personally, I do not find the idea of God or death as a threat. But what I DO find as a threat is the idea that people have the capability to tinker in people’s brains and are able to diminish our foundational beliefs.

THAT’S threatening.

And how strange that they are researching how to shut off our capacity to perceive a potential threat. It wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that they recognize that they, themselves, are the threat, would it?…

They also acknowledge that a belief in religious ideas can be comforting, especially at the prospect of death.

“Dr Keise Izuma, of the authors of the study from the University of York, said: “As expected, we found that when we experimentally turned down the posterior medial frontal cortex, people were less inclined to reach for comforting religious ideas despite having been reminded of death.”

Yet, because of their experiments and the amount of TSM dosage they used, they were able to lessen this inclination in some of the people.

A short summary of the study that the article is based upon:

“- experimentally decreased both avowed belief in God and out-group derogation by downregulating pMFC activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation. The results provide the first evidence that group prejudice and religious belief are susceptible to targeted neuromodulation

Neuromodulation of group prejudice and religious belief (September 2015)

There is also a video which shows TMS workers Choi Deblieck (one of the authors cited on the “Neuromodulation of group prejudice and religious belief” article) and Alyssa Hindle demonstrating how the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation works.

(Keep in mind, while this work was done in 2014, there is a common understanding that the technology we see is but a mere fraction of what is currently available. There are estimates that some of the military technology, for example, can be up to 50 years ahead of its time, if not even further.)

Source: youtube | Alyssa Hindle | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Demonstration

While they show a headpiece being necessary to stimulate this type of response, we must be aware that there are efforts to be able to induce this type of reaction without the use of gadgets. This is also only showing what can they manipulate in our physical body through transcranial means – it does not show what effect it has on the brain and how this type of device can tune down our belief in God. But according to their studies, this is a possibility.

DARPA is heavily invested in this type of research

James Giordano, a doctor that specializes in neurotechnology and who has worked with DARPA, admits that one of their key goals is to “affect the ticking and tocking of the brain” in order to influence “the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions of those individuals”. During one of his lectures, transcribed in full here, he states about transcranial neuromodulation:

“Clearly one of the things we can also do is transcranial neuromodulation. The idea of going through the skull to modulate the node network activity of the brain, to optimize the performance of key individuals in certain tasks and performances that are relative to the missional space, and we can also do that against hostile or perhaps belligerent others.

“So how then, can we use these elements as weapons? Means of contending against others? Formal definition of a weapon, right under the Oxford Old English Dictionary: ‘means of contending against others’. And we can do that in a number of ways. We can militate their behaviors and their thoughts in some ways as to make them more amenable to what we do. The idea of positive weaponology. Or we can in fact mitigate, and in some cases, completely nullify their capability, will, or engagement to fight.

“we’re talking about the transcranial devices, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transporting electrical stimulation

“Can we engage certain brain substrates, nodes and networks, through the use of new pharmaceuticals or older pharmaceuticals that are re-dosed, or pharmaceutically delivered in different ways

– James Giordano / The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future

Let’s hypothesize for a moment that if people are being injected with graphene oxide, like doctors and scientists are purportedly finding in the COVID vaccines, their body now essentially becomes an antenna able to receive this stimuli through, perhaps, 5G towers, satellites, DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), EMF (Electromagnetic field), etc. – all wirelessly.

“Graphene and graphene derivatives (e.g., graphene oxide (GO)) have been incorporated into hydrogels to improve the properties (e.g., mechanical strength) of conventional hydrogels and/or develop new functions (e.g., electrical conductivity and drug loading/delivery).”

Graphene oxide-incorporated hydrogels for biomedical applications

“Nanocomposites based on magnetic GO (MGO) [Magnetic Graphene Oxide] possess unique properties; they have a high specific surface area, surface-active sites, excellent magnetic characteristics, high chemical stability, an adjustable size and shape, and can be simply functionalized or modified.”

Silica Magnetic Graphene Oxide Improves the Effects of Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium on Acute Liver Failure

Combine all of this knowledge with James Giordano’s assertions and the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation studies, along with more of DARPA’s research:

“Recent DARPA-funded research has demonstrated that human brains sense magnetic fields, like those used by animals for navigation, and that this process is ‘jammed’ (i.e., disrupted) by radio waves (RF), impacting brainwaves and behavior.

STTR: HR001120S0019-18 Impact of Cockpit Electro-Magnetics on Aircrew Neurology (ICEMAN)

This, however, seems to be implying that no invasive therapeutics (like graphene oxide?) are necessary, but all of the studies combined seems to indicate that a substance like graphene oxide, nanoparticles, hydrogels, etc. can induce a stronger response – which is, of course, what the neuroscientists want to achieve.

In another DARPA invested study, we have the “Magneto” protein:

“Researchers in the United States have developed a new method for controlling the brain circuits associated with complex animal behaviours, using genetic engineering to create a magnetised protein that activates specific groups of nerve cells from a distance.”

“Several earlier studies have shown that nerve cell proteins which are activated by heat and mechanical pressure can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves and magnetic fields, by attaching them to an iron-storing protein called ferritin, or to inorganic paramagnetic particles.”

“Next, the researchers inserted the Magneto DNA sequence into the genome of a virus, together with the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and regulatory DNA sequences that cause the construct to be expressed only in specified types of neurons. They then injected the virus into the brains of mice, targeting the entorhinal cortex, and dissected the animals’ brains to identify the cells that emitted green fluorescence. Using microelectrodes, they then showed that applying a magnetic field to the brain slices activated Magneto so that the cells produce nervous impulses.”

“This shows that Magneto can remotely control the firing of neurons deep within the brain, and also control complex behaviours.”

Genetically engineered ‘Magneto’ protein remotely controls brain and behaviour

And let’s, of course, not forget about DARPA’s involvements with several prominent vaccine companies…

Moderna

“Prior to the worldwide lockdowns in 2020, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were surreptitiously working on a new mRNA vaccine platform using a new biotech company called Moderna. Their strategic planning began in 2013, when DARPA funds were used by Moderna to invent methods for inducing a short-lived immune response through administration of mRNA vaccines.”

BOMBSHELL: DARPA was secretly developing the mRNA vaccine years ago through Moderna, and they seek permanent control over your body and bloodline

Pfizer

“The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) awarded Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) a $7.7 million contract to research whether it might be possible to “identify and subsequently induce the production of protective antibodies to an emerging pathogen directly in an infected or exposed individual.”

DARPA Hires Pfizer to Perform Groundbreaking Vaccine Research

AstraZeneca

“The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) have reached an interagency agreement with AstraZeneca to support phase 1 clinical development of a monoclonal antibody combination therapy for use against COVID-19.”

BARDA, DARPA support AstraZeneca through phase 1 trial of COVID-19 therapeutic

How altruistic of DARPA to fund the top 3 pharmaceutical companies who are manufacturing these COVID vaccines worldwide in order to stop this deadly coronavirus from spreading. Certainly it wouldn’t have anything to do with their ongoing projects to control “the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions” of everyone.

Who is directing the “narrative”?

And to tie this all back together with religion, with more of the U.S. government’s involvement, including DARPA again in some statements, is a familiar TMS study also conducted around the 2012-2013 timeframe… the same timeframe that DARPA was making contracts with Pfizer and Moderna…

“This project investigates cognitive activity and narrative in the context of persuasive rhetoric in a multidisciplinary manner that significantly advances the knowledge base of neuroscience, narrative studies, and social and cognitive psychology. A critical goal of the project is to come to a greater understanding of the role narrative plays in encouraging individuals to support or participate in political violence and be subject to extremist recruitment.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

Huh. According to this summary, one of their main focal points is to determine how “narrative” plays a role in influencing emotions and behaviors.

narrative:
      1. A narrated account; a story.
      2. The art, technique, or process of narrating.
      3. The presentation of the positions of a politician or political party in the media, as by press releases, speeches, and interviews.

wordnik.com/narrative

Additional sections of the “narrative” study:

“Generally, participants will view a series of video vignettes that either map or do not map local narratives onto a master narrative framework drawn from their religious affiliation (Christian or Muslim).”

“Finally, participants attitudes and behaviors will be measured to assess how vertical integration influences beliefs and persuasion.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

Vertical integration? Kind of like how Pope Francis (Christian supposedly…) and Ahmed el-Tayeb (Muslim) signed a “Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together“, which upholds “The firm conviction that authentic teachings of religions invite us to remain rooted in the values of peace; to defend the values of mutual understanding, human fraternity and harmonious coexistence”? (and doesn’t mention Jesus Christ once?)

The same Pope Francis who states on one hand, in this very same document, that “We therefore condemn all those practices that are a threat to life such as genocide, acts of terrorism, forced displacement, trafficking in human organs, abortion and euthanasia. We likewise condemn the policies that promote these practices.”, while on the other hand announces that COVID vaccines that are derived from aborted fetuses are morally acceptable?

And not only did he state that the vaccines are morally acceptable, but has also promoted vaccine mandates for all?

The same Pope Francis that allowed the statue of Moloch to be displayed outside the Roman Colosseum?

As an aside, but still very pertinent to this topic, is to be aware of declarations of “false peace” – which is what the Document of Human Fraternity seems to be all about.

“Now as to the times and the epochs, brethren, you have no need of anything to be written to you. For you yourselves know full well that the day of the Lord will come just like a thief in the night. While they are saying, “Peace and safety!” then destruction will come upon them suddenly like labor pains upon a woman with child, and they will not escape.”1 Thessalonians 5:1-3

“They have healed the brokenness of My people superficially,
Saying, ‘Peace, peace,’
But there is no peace.”
Jeremiah 6:14

“But, “Ah, Lord God!” I said, “Look, the prophets are telling them, ‘You will not see the sword nor will you have famine, but I will give you lasting peace in this place.’” Then the Lord said to me, “The prophets are prophesying falsehood in My name. I have neither sent them nor commanded them nor spoken to them; they are prophesying to you a false vision, divination, futility and the deception of their own minds.”Jeremiah 14:13-14

“Do not drag me away with the wicked
And with those who work iniquity,
Who speak peace with their neighbors,
While evil is in their hearts.”
Psalm 28:3

One last section of the narrative/TMS study to influence our thoughts and belief structures:

“we will manipulate theoretically and empirically (from Phase 1) derived aspects of narrative validity and transportation to influence vertical integration and persuasion

“In Phase 3, we will selectively alter aspects of narrative structure and brain functioning via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to induce or disrupt selective features of narrative processing, to provide the strongest possible inferences about the operation of the narrative comprehension network.”

” – includes funding to support adding 20 additional subjects, to add a condition (an additional religious group) to our design to provide better experimental control.”

Toward Narrative Disruptors and Inductors: Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects

And with these capabilities to shut down and/or change our belief/connection with God, what then happens when something like Voice-to-Skull technology (another DARPA invention) is employed? We would no longer have any discernment or intuition skills in determining if this is coming from the Creator or beamed into us by an agency posing as “God” or the “Messiah”, Buddha, Shiva, etc., etc.

It would seem that these studies can imply one very significant directive in which our societies are inevitably heading towards – that of a One World Religion and One World Order.

Interestingly, Chrislam – a movement that came about due to Pope Francis’ and Ahmed el-Tayeb’s fraternity partnership, has been building a “trinity” of worship places consisting of the church, synagogue, and mosque known as the Abrahamic Family House; set to open this year (2022).

The Bible prophesizes that an agenda similar to the “New World Order” will happen, whether we like it or not. And if it involves our own thoughts, emotions, feelings, attitudes, beliefs being manipulated in whatever way they can to influence us to accepting this, then one of our main defenses is to build up our awareness, our discernment, our very own frequency, perhaps, so that we will be able to resist these attempts. And stay strong in our faith in God and the Lord Jesus Christ, so that we will be able to avoid these deceptive tactics.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by J F from Pixabay

“Year of the Vaccine” – Plandemic in the Making. 2011 Kickstarted a Campaign to Condition the World to Accepting Worldwide Vaccines

Preparedness 101: Getting the world ready for a global vaccination plan.

Making the case for a zombie apocalypse wasn’t as hard as I thought it’d be. And while that post is still in the making, I had to take this moment to comment on something incredibly unnerving and foreboding, especially in light of what’s been going on around us lately, that I found while researching this possible “zombie apocalypse scenario”.

With figureheads such as the CDC (although, who can forget their complete ineptitude, read: complicity, when it comes to the “coronavirus/vaccine pandemic” – or perhaps EVERYTHING in their history…), the U.S. government/military (again, same thing could apply – even if the majority in the agencies don’t realize it), and other organizations, like Amazon, detailing what it would be like in a zombie apocalypse – it wasn’t too difficult to bring these pieces together.

There are allusions to this incredibly alarming and frightening possibility.

However, this post reveals their ultimate goal whether we’re having a zombie apocalypse, or even a thunderstorm watch. It has nothing to do with being “prepared” but is instead a misdirection to promote, what else?

THE VACCINE.

For instance, taking the CDC to task with their Preparedeness 101: Zombie Apocalypse post, which has now been deleted, by the way (linked article is to the web archived version) – after 10 years of being available – which is strange in itself. (Too much feedback? Misunderstandings on what the post was really about? What was the reason they had to delete this article – isn’t publicity what they wanted?)

And yes, while this information has been available for over 10 years, it’s interesting when connecting that to the details of what’s going on today. For an intriguing look, I took a read into their comic book that they created (yes, they even went so far as to making a comic book about an impending zombie apocalypse…), and selected some key choice words to reflect on:

News report: “Stay in your homes. Do not go outside. If you or your family begin showing symptoms such as slowed movement, slurred speech, or violent behaviors, isolate them to a secure area of the house. Stay tuned for more information on where to go… Stay in your…”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 12)

Dr. Chang: “It appears to be a highly mutated form of the flu. They’ve labeled it Z5N1.”

Dr. Greene: “Interesting… do we know what the source is?”

Dr. Chang: “No sir… the field staff are still trying to investigate where it started. But several of them have now become infected. The zombie virus is spreading rapidly infecting 21 people for every infected person.”

Dr. Greene: “All the more reason to get this vaccine made… and fast!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 15/16)

Scientist: “We’re using the same type of vaccine that we use for the seasonal flu… but engineering it to target Z5N1.”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 18)

News report: “…CDC shipped out its first supply of vaccines against this novel virus that has been ravaging the nation. The first round should reach safe zones as early as this evening…”

Crowd members: “What?!”

Worker: “Hey folks, the vaccines are on their way!”

Julie (one of the main characters):We’re saved?! I can’t believe it!”

Crowd members: “Vaccines?!”

“Yay!!”

Narration: [“While the shelter erupts in cheers, hugs and tears of relief… outside the school’s protective fence, shadowy figures are closing in…”]

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 26)

Keep in mind, this is VERBATIM. I am not changing any of the words or punctuation, or bold print.

Health worker: “Alright folks, listen up… at 0600 we start shipping out the first round of vaccine and supplies to the states…

From there the state health departments will divvy up the supplies and take them to the various points of dispensing.

We’ve got a lot of work to do so don’t expect to get any breaks until everyone has been vaccinated. Now let’s move!”

PREPAREDNESS 101: ZOMBIE OUTBREAK Comic Book (pg. 27)

SPOILER ALERT! – The zombie apocalypse scenario was all a dream… based on the spooky scary movie that Todd (main character) watched at the beginning of this comic.

Which obviously begs the question, while the CDC uses this as an example of Emergency Preparedness, even listing a group of items that would be useful in case of emergency, what on EARTH does that have to do with vaccines?

In my opinion, it would have to be obvious to even the most stubborn and hard-headed of people that this whole comic book about “preparedness” was all about endorsing vaccines. Even at the end of the comic, after Todd wakes up from his zombie apocalypse dream, he realizes that a weather emergency truly is on the way and it would be wise to gather important items for an emergency kit.

Even the last page left us with this message:

“We hope you enjoyed reading this fictional story. It’s meant to be both educational and entertaining. Now that you’ve seen the importance of being prepared, take the time to put together an emergency kit with the items included in the checklist on the inside of the back cover. You’ll be ready for any kind of disaster, even zombies.”

So again, I have to ask, what does this have to do with vaccines?

Unless, of course, they’re slyly implying that vaccines will save the day in case of a real zombie apocalypse. Although it would seem, those of us who are astute enough to observe the actions and reactions of the CDC, the W.H.O., NIH, etc. they would most likely BE THE CAUSE of the zombie apocalypse… for the sole reason of introducing a vaccine to us.

If that wasn’t bad enough, on their hurricane guideline article, right after suggesting basic steps to prepare for a hurricane, is the advice to get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. …

Preparing for a Hurricane

Follow these important hurricane preparedness tips from CDC:

      • Prepare for a hurricane: Take basic steps now to ensure your safety should a storm hit.
      • Get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as you can. COVID-19 vaccines help protect you from getting sick or severely ill with COVID-19 and may also help protect people around you.
      • Get emergency supplies: Stock your home and your car with supplies. Give yourself more time than usual to prepare your emergency food, water, and medicine supplies. Home delivery is the safest choice for buying disaster supplies; however, that may not be an option for everyone. If in-person shopping is your only choice, take steps to protect your and others’ health when running essential errands.
      • Make a plan: Create a family disaster plan.
      • Prepare to evacuate: Never ignore an evacuation order. Pay attention to local guidance about updated plans for evacuations and shelters, including shelters for your pets.
      • Protect older adults: Understand older adult health and medical concerns.
      • Protect your pets: Ensure your pet’s safety before, during, and after a hurricane.
      • When you check on neighbors and friends, be sure to follow social distancing recommendations (staying at least 6 feet from others) and other CDC recommendations to protect yourself and others.

Now, if there really was a deadly disease outbreak (COVID is not – it has been admitted from several agencies that “COVID” is on par with the common cold and seasonal flu in the majority of people) I would be inclined to agree to protect oneself and their friends/family from it, whether there was an imminent hurricane (or zombie apocalypse) coming or not. However, the unusually high efforts to push vaccines so forcefully has made me reassess that vaccines (perhaps all of them) are nothing more than deliberate poison and/or alternative agenda to inject people with a substance(s) that “they”, for some reason, REALLY want to get into us.

Continuing on with the creepy obvious promotion of vaccines, we have the movie Contagion, also about a respiratory illness and – what else?

Vaccines to save the day.

And, in what’s perhaps an incredible coincidence (it’s not), Contagion also came out in 2011, the same year as the CDC comic Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse.

And for your perusal, here are some interesting lines/events from that film as well, as a brief run through:

SPOILERS for the movie Contagion:

[starts out with a woman coughing – turns out that this woman is cheating on her husband – tactic to make people believe that’s how she got sick?]

[then it pans to the words: “KOWLOON HONG KONG population 2.1 million” – this trope is used throughout the film to show us the population of the various different cities that they cover. Interesting that this would be one of the focal points, seeing as how the globalists are obsessed with population control…]

[@~4:35 into the movie, the CDC makes an appearance. Soon after that, we’re introduced to Alan, the “conspiracy theorist“.]

[Mitch Emhoff, the main character, watches as his wife, Beth Emhoff, and stepson dies.]

[Strangely, Geneva Switzerland does not get a population control monitor.]

[@11:50 into the film, the World Health Organization shows up]

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @17:55: “At this point, I think we have to believe that this is respiratory. Maybe fomites too. … It refers to transmission from surfaces. The average person touches their face 2 or 3,000 times a day. … 3-5 times every waking minute. In between, we’re touching doorknobs, water fountains, elevator buttons, and each other. Those things become fomites.

How fast it multiples depends on a variety of factors. The incubation period. How long a person is contagious. Sometimes people can be contagious without even having symptoms.

Dr. Ian Sussman @21:40: “Shows novel characteristics. It appears to be chimeric in origin.”

Alan: “This is a biological weapon.”

[@22:30, the Department of Homeland Security steps in. Shortly after, the CIA is mentioned.]

DHS worker: “Is there any way that someone can weaponize the bird flu? Is that what we’re looking at?”

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “Someone doesn’t have to weaponize the bird flu. The birds are doing that.”

Dr. Hextall @28:25: “We’re getting the same results as Dr. Sussman. We’ve sequenced the virus and determined its origin and we’ve modeled the way it enters the cells of the lung and the brain. And the virus contains both bat and pig sequences.

Somewhere in the world, the wrong pig met up with the wrong bat.

CDC Dr. Ellis Cheever: “You ever seen anything like this before?”

Dr. Hextall: “No. And… it’s still changing. It’s figuring us out faster than we’re figuring it out.”

CDC Dr. Erin Mears @39:14:FEMA can handle food in the basement.” [@40:00 – Minnesota Army National Guard Armory building to be used as an Emergency Operation and Readiness Center]

[@51:50 – Dr. Leonora Orantes (who works at the W.H.O.) gets kidnapped by a Chinese group that is holding her hostage until a cure is ready in order to trade her for the cure for his village]

[@54:30 – Alan, the “conspiracy theoriest” blogger/journalist, is working to convince his viewers that Forsythia (early treatment medicine) will work against the virus.]

Dr. Ellis Cheever @ 55:26: “I mean, we’re just putting healthy people next to sick people and hoping that the healthy people don’t get sick. It’s ridiculous.”

[@58:15 – Panic and chaos erupt as people rush to get the limited supply of Forsythia. Film shows the city decimated with smoke and fire and stores/buildings are destroyed and looted. Editor’s note: clearly depicting a world that the globalists are hoping for in order to justify their “new world order”. ]

[@1:00:55 – Alan is leaving flyers around that say:

THE CDC LIES. THEY COLLABORATE WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. THERE IS A CURE.  TO EFFECTIVELY TREAT MEV-1. FORSYTHIA IS A NATURAL AND SAFE THERAPY. DON’T LET THE GOVERNMENT MISLEAD YOU IN ORDER TO GAIN A PROFIT. JOIN THE MOVEMENT AND SPREAD THE WORD OF HOPE.]

[@1:03:40 – We are “treated” to a dialogue between the CDC’s Dr. Cheever and CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta, as well as Alan.

Sanjay Gupta: “Alan, today on Twitter you wrote that the truth about this virus is being kept from the world by the CDC, by the World Health Organization, to allow friends of the current administration to benefit from it, both financially and physically.

On your blog, you also wrote that the World Health Organization is somehow in bed with pharmaceutical companies?”

Alan: “Because they are. That’s who stands to gain from this. They’re working hand in glove. And the hand is reaching into our pocket.”

Dr. Cheever: “We’re working very hard to find out where this virus came from. To treat it, and to vaccinate against it if we can.” [Editor’s note: this was not the first time that a vaccine was mentioned in this film]

Dr. Hextall @1:07:58: “It’s mutated. It’s moved into an African HIV/AIDS population.”

Huh. Interesting. It’s almost as if this film is a blue-print for everything that COVID will eventually entail. Again, not a coincidence… Moving on:

Oh, but first, a number that the “elites” love to display, and also tied in with the vaccines:

Still image from the film Contagion (2011)

Dr. Cheever @1:08:30: “I thought you said that once we grow it we can vaccinate against it?”

Dr. Hextall: “We tried using dead virus, combined with several adjuvants to boost immune response.”

Dr. Cheever: “And?”

Dr. Hextall: “No protective antibodies. A lot of dead monkeys.

Now we have to try a live attenuated virus. … The only danger with live virus is the possibility that it will revert to wild type and kill the host.”

Dr. Cheever @1:09:18: “Without a vaccine, we can anticipate that approximately 1 in 12 people on the planet will contract the disease.”

[@1:10:55 – Another chaotic outbreak ensues as a military officer announces they have exhausted their supply of MREs for that day.]

Dr. Cheever @1:15:12: “Well, Homeland Security wants to know if we can put a vaccination in the water supply. Like… fluoride – cure everyone all at once.”

[Dr. Hextall does not answer this question. Says that she is going home.]

[@1:18:10 – The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is mentioned as the agency to “accelerate approval” of the vaccines which has finally been found by Dr. Hextall]

[@1:22:20 – Alan is arrested for spreading misinformation and impeding the health/government agency’s efforts]

RADM (Rear Admiral) Haggerty @1:22:40: We may never know where this disease came from, but we do know that this vaccine is the result of the courage and perseverance of a remarkable few.”

Mitch Emhoff @1:24:58: It’s gonna start getting normal again.”

[@1:28:30 – Dr. Leonora Orantes is traded for the vaccines for the Chinese village, but it’s revealed that the vaccines are a placebo. Dr. Orantes leaves her “rescuer” – clearly perturbed by the situation.]

[@1:30:00 – Mitch Emhoff shows his vaccination and/or immunity status by a bright orange wrist band with a UPC (Universal Product code) barcode on it in order to get into a mall.]

[@1:30:20 – It is insinuated that Alan, the “conspiracy theorist” journalist made up the early treatment cure for money.
Officer French:
“And now you want to tell people not to get vaccinated when that’s the best chance they got.”]

[@1:35:50 – Shows Dr. Hextall at the CDC lab adding what appears to be the MEV-1 culture to a container that has both the SARS and H1N1 culture.]

[@1:40:25 – Right before the end of the movie, we see a flashback of how the “virus” all started. Starting with a tree which is torn down by the very same company that Beth Emhoff worked at; releasing a group of bats. One of the bats takes a bite out of a banana, which subsequently drops a piece of it into a pig pen. (…I think we can see where this is going…) A pig happens to eat it, which is then selected as the prize token for a restaurant to butcher and serve to its patrons.

While this is happening, the chef, who has just handled raw pork – from obviously the same pig that ate the bat infested banana… – shakes hands with Beth Emhoff after brusquely wiping his hands on his apron.

The end.

Whew. Just when you thought they wouldn’t trace the virus back to bats and/or pigs, this movie managed to do it within the last minute.

As you can see, the whole movie was just one, large propaganda piece to market vaccines as the end all-be-all. Even casting a large shadow on alternative media and other data as a hypocritical means to exploit people at their most vulnerable, while at the same time absolving any government agency of complicity and tying it all back together to bats.

Basically, to sum this movie up in one sentence, “A multi-million dollar, 1 hour and 45 minute promotional ad to paint the CDC, WHO, and other government/health agencies as the unsung heroes of our age while peddling the vaccines as the savior of mankind.”

One can, of course, argue that they were going for realism, and since Mr. Sanjay Gupta also had a cameo appearance in this film, I feel it prudent to once again bring up his interview with Mr. Bill Gates, ALSO CONDUCTED IN 2011, talking about the Year of the Vaccines, which would be 2021 – according to this snippet:

Sanjay Gupta: “10 billion dollars over the next ten years to make it the year of the vaccines… what, what does that mean exactly?

Bill Gates: “Well, over this decade, uh, we believe unbelievable progress can be made, both inventing new vaccines and making sure they get out to all the children who need them. Uh, we can cut the number of children who die every year from about 9 million to half of that uh, if we have success on it. The benefits are in terms of reducing sickness, reducing the population growth; it really allows a society a chance to take care of itself, uh, once you’ve made the intervention.

“Realism” indeed. Or planned out specifically to condition people to accepting a worldwide vaccine.

And because I watched the WHOLE movie (much to my chagrin), credits included, I noticed this little addition: “IN ASSOCIATION WITH PARTICIPANT MEDIA“. [Los Angeles, California-based film production company founded in 2004 by Jeffrey Skoll, dedicated to entertainment intended to spur social change. – wiki]

And who funds/grants Participant Media?

Screenshot image @gatesfoundation.org

Oh Bill Gates. You never let us down.

There was also special thanks to the CDC, the United States Department of Defense, and California/Illinois/Georgia National Guards.

They also have this lovely warning: “IT’S NOT IF, BUT WHEN.

And to make matters even worse, a 2011 Forbes article titled “With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes the World Again“, used the following for its web address: [ https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2011/11/02/the-second-coming-of-bill-gates/?sh=692eb8dc13fd ]

(No. Just, no.)

Some interesting information and opinion pieces from that article:

GAVI set out to do things differently in two ways. First, buy-in: It forced ­developing countries to cofinance vaccination programs, even at the nominal amount of 20 cents a dose. And second, accountability: It required clear record-keeping to ensure the vaccines were getting to children and to establish a sustainable delivery system.

“The blogosphere still expels dark plumes of “I Hate Bill Gates” posts and websites, accusing him of bilking taxpayers because Seattle granted him free land to build the new campus or spreading autism through vaccines (now a widely discredited theory) or of playing God through his foundation. Some clinicians criticize him, wistfully, for fixating on vaccines to the exclusion of other medical causes. But for someone once pilloried as the Antichrist of technology, a brutal monopolist who strangled innovation, this generosity—less of the heart than the head—has made him a saint among those most familiar with his efforts.”

With Vaccines, Bill Gates Changes The World Again (November 2, 2011)

Quite a mixture of words there.

The adulation aside, which is overflowing in the article, there is, of course, the efforts to ridicule any dissenting opinion (or even facts) about vaccine efficacy.

With all of that being said, even if one doesn’t believe that these health agencies and “philanthropists” and government bodies are intentionally doing something drastic to humanity, there has to be SOMEthing within them that is telling them that something is not right with what’s been going on; especially now during the “COVID pandemic”.

There are more and more data showing that the very same agencies that are supposed to be helping to heal people, are in fact introducing the illness to us, in whatever way they can – perhaps through the air, water, foods, flu shots or other injections, drugs, EMF, radiation, etc., and that these vaccines, for whatever reason, are their main goal.

These plans have been decades in the making. We must develop our awareness and knowledge about these attempts, and make informed decisions based on this data. People’s continuous refusal to acknowledge that there are sinister goals of those in high positions throughout several institutions are falling into the trap of “disbelief” and labeling everything as a “conspiracy theory”, just as the C.I.A. has promulgated into society. And because of this disbelief, they are deceived and taken advantage of.

There are conspiracies going on in the world. And sadly, they’re not just theories.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Johaehn from Pixabay

An Essential Question We All Must Ask Ourselves: How Far Will We Go to Save Our Own Life?

How much is our life worth? Or our child? Where is the limit?

As some of my dear readers may be aware of, I have been covering an interesting figure of the 1990’s in a few of my posts by the name of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov.

His history is fraught with mystery and intrigue, since it is claimed that he came to this world in order to warn this current generation that we will be the one to see the rise of the antichrist.

Now, I will just add this caveat: I cannot be entirely sure that this is a true account. Of course, I don’t think any of us can. There have been a lot of speculation and guesses as to who, what, where, when and how THE antichrist will make his appearance. And there are many who don’t follow the biblical testaments or believe in any religious/philosophical heralding of an impeding apocalypse, so don’t wonder about this at all and/or think it is only a conspiracy-theory-doomsday-delusion.

However, I am a believer in Jesus Christ and do believe that there are biblical warnings that point to what we should be on the lookout for. And because of this reason, I have been researching several different subjects, and Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov is one that just happened to catch my eye. And whether his is a true account or not, the topics that have been allegedly covered by this young individual – retold through his mother – resonates with me and I find a lot of truth within the subjects that he has mentioned.

For instance, the topic that I’m covering today is something that I have wondered about and struggled with in my pursuit of the truth and the reality of life and death; even before I came across this young prophet and his point of view. Which is incredibly deep coming from such a young child (he passed away at the age of 10). While this article is not about him personally, it is about a topic that he has broached, and because I have contemplated on this matter as well, wanted to delve deeper into the truth of this subject.

The Quest for Immortality (or even an extended life)

In my musings, I have wondered whether the notion of transfusions/transplants goes against what God intended. I know this might be an incredibly sensitive topic, but if we are pursuing the truth, then we must address difficult questions with a genuine and sincere approach, instead of aversion and antagonism. It is not my intention to offend anyone or pass judgement. Only to discuss this matter from a perspective that may not have been considered before.

With that being said, are we fully aware of the implications that may arise when pursuing this route when trying to save ourselves or a loved one?

Where are the organ donations coming from?…

The horrors of black market organ harvesting cannot be ignored, nor can the unscrupulous actions of the medical industry when faced with the possibility of a patient who is willing to pay ungodly amounts of money in order to save their own life, or one of their loved ones.

While some could never believe that such atrocities exist, the sad reality is that the love of money (and of one’s life) can push someone to make unethical decisions. Even if an organ transplant patient or blood transfusion recipient has no idea of the sinister back alley handed dealings, this secret, behind the scenes business may still be taking place.

“How was forced organ harvesting uncovered? The story starts with a whistleblower, a woman with a pseudonym Annie, who made a public statement in March 2006 that her ex-husband had been harvesting corneas of Falun Gong practitioners from 2003 to 2005 in Sujiatun hospital in Shenyang City in Liaoning Province in China. Other doctors in the hospital had been harvesting other organs. The Falun Gong were killed through organ extraction. Their bodies, after organ extraction, were cremated.”

How Was Forced Organ Harvesting Uncovered

As if this wasn’t horrific enough, the implications that the “cabal” may be behind some of the organ harvesting/trafficking may be in play as well.

In a harrowing interview, Stew Peters gives a child-trafficking victim a platform to speak on the tragic and devastating encounters she’s had within the corrupt “elite’s” cult and what she’s learned. It is a very heartbreaking and disturbing account – certainly not for the faint of heart. (I can’t watch this video without crying.)

A short testimony about the organ/body-harvesting trade:

Ally Carter @23:38: “- this is not about a sexual experience, this is not about just cash; this is about something else and it’s deeper than that. Because this is decades of tactics, this is decades of issues, these are decades of problems. Satanic ritual abuse exists, um, human sex-trafficking exists, organ-harvesting exists all over the place. The black market exists.

Um, humans, babies, children, 4 year olds/6 year olds, having their bodies sliced open and used as human suitcases over the border. I have been trafficked over the border.

Those babies are moved as if they’re still alive. They put clothes on them, they sit them up, and they use them until their bodies cannot be used anymore.

This is not just about sex. Because after your body is used for sex, your organs are used for organ harvesting and selling on the black market, which goes to your hospitals; you wonder why a heart costs so much. You wonder why a liver or kidney costs so much.”

Source: VICTIM: “BIDEN & OBAMA RAPED ME”: POWERFUL ELITES, CELEBS, DEMONIC SEX ABUSE RING

And while she claims to have evidence of the abuse that she’s had to endure – by the hands of some of the most prominent figures in our world today, no less – she doesn’t specify if she has the proof for the organ-harvesting claims.

However, this most certainly should not detract from the reality that this is a very real criminal enterprise.

In 2012, Patrick McMahon, Air Force combat veteran and nurse practitioner, made waves when he accused The New York Organ Donor Network for pressuring the doctors to prematurely declare patients “brain dead” in order to meet a quote, “and even hired “coaches” to train staffers how to be more persuasive” in convincing next-of-kin to sign their deceased love one over as an organ donor.

In one chilling allegation, Patrick McMahon submitted the following as an example of their gross misconduct:

“In September 2011, a 19-year-old man injured in a car wreck was admitted to Nassau University Medical Center. He was still trying to breathe and showed signs of brain activity, the suit charged.

But doctors declared him brain dead under pressure from donor-network officials, including Director Michael Goldstein, who allegedly said during a conference call: “This kid is dead, you got that?” the suit charged.” Organs taken from patients that doctors were pressured to declare brain dead: suit

An update to this lawsuit in 2017 had The New York Donor Network deny Mr. Patrick McMahon’s allegations, but also refused to release the documents of the patients in question, even after the judge court ordered them to do so; the New York Donor Network even going so far as to appeal this request through the Manhattan Supreme Court.

In another shocking Stew Peters exposé, a nurse claims to have found the connection between the deadly push of Remdesivir and the seemingly strategic planning of their patient’s deaths:

“I am an RN working in case management at _______ Hospital in California, and I know why the hospitals are killing their own patients.” Upon receiving this nurse’s horrific findings, The Stew Peters Show was able to get this whistleblower nurse to come on the show and answer the tough questions about the connection she found between the use of deadly Remdesivir, Vancomycin, and organ donors.

In the email, the whistleblower stated: “There is a link between the hospital deaths and organ harvesting in the state of California…Every patient’s license is in their medical records, and they can tell if they are organ donors or not.”Whistleblower: Hospitals Killing For Organs, “This is Absolutely Evil And A Crime Against Humanity!”

Are organs being harvested from LIVE people?

To add on to the controversial aspect of this medical intervention, is the huge debate surrounding the vitality of the organs and how long someone must stay alive – either naturally or through mechanical means – in order to keep their organs viable for distribution.

The medical condition of the person at the time of death can determine what organs and tissues can be donated and what cannot be. Organs need to be removed as soon as the person is declared brain-dead. Without the necessary oxygen supply, the organs stop functioning right.

The approximate amount of time between recovering the tissues/organs and transplanting them is:

    • Lung – 4 to 6 hours
    • Heart – 4 hours
    • Liver – 24 hours
    • Pancreas – 24 hours
    • Kidney – 72 hours
    • Cornea – 14 days
    • Bones – 5 years
    • Skin – 5 year
    • Heart Valves – 10 years

This is why creating a tissue bank (heart valves, skin, bones etc.) is possible but creating an organ bank is not. In case of organ transplantation, the process has to be very quick in order to save a life.

Keeping a brain-dead person on ventilator support helps as the organs continue receiving oxygen, providing a window of time for doctors to conduct organ transplantation.

Source: Time in which organs need to be donated after death

According to the above website, the heart and lungs are only viable within a 4 hour time frame. I assume this to mean that by the time the donor is “deceased”, the organs must immediately be transplanted to the intended recipient within the designated time. Otherwise it is too late and the organs (and therefore the payment) is no longer an option.

So by these conditions, the body must technically still be alive during the extraction of the organs, and the definition on what “brain dead” and “not legally alive” means is hotly contested in areas of not only ethical considerations, but scientific data as well.

For instance, there are reports of near-death experiencers being declared “brain dead“, “clinically dead”, “dead dead” (being in the morgue for 3 days…), yet still coming back from that brink with a story to tell. If their body was announced as technically dead, for all intents and purposes, then how is it at all possible for their “consciousness” to return to their body and having the lucidity return to them?

(DISCLAIMER: Please take these claims with a grain of salt. Always use discernment as most of these are anecdotal accounts and cannot be proven or provided with evidence.)

And how does this bode for the several thousands and thousands of people who have been declared “brain dead”, all in order for doctors/nurses/black market organ workers… to rush in to cut open their bodies (while still technically alive) and start harvesting for organs and tissue? And with that in mind, what would happen if a person who is declared “brain dead” suddenly regains their consciousness WHILE HAVING THEIR ORGANS REMOVED?

In some nerve-wrecking and heartbreaking reports, the following accounts demonstrates that this may, in fact, be possible:

– “April 2012 – Doctors declared british teen Stephen Thorpe “brain dead,” telling the father that the boy would never recover from a serious car accident. Despite pressure from the doctors, the father would not consent to allow the boy’s organs to be donated. With the help of other doctors, five weeks later Thorpe left the hospital, having almost completely recovered.”

– “July 2013 – A New York woman who was pronounced ‘brain dead’ by doctors unexpectedly awoke just as her organs were about to be removed for transplant.”

– “2014 U.S. man wakes up in morgue in body bag: An American man wasn’t pronounced “brain” dead, but dead dead. Hospital workers in Lexington, Mississippi zippered him into a sack and shipped to the morgue where he freaked out the workers preparing to embalm him by kicking his way out of his body bag. When Walter Williams actually did die, his nephew told a TV reporter, “I think he’s gone this time.” Shesh. If a nurse, a doctor, a coroner, and other hospital staff could get “dead” so very wrong…”

– 2014 – “Swedish man hears doctors urging the harvesting of his organs: Doctors in Sweden discussed organ donation within earshot of Jimi Fritze as he lay in hospital after a stroke. To the doctor’s shocking surprise, Fritze could hear every word they said. However, he couldn’t object because he couldn’t move. He had suffered a stroke, and after the doctors looked at a scan of his brain, they gave his family bad news, and claimed that “there was no hope,” Fritze said.”

– March 2018 – Thirteen-year-old Trenton McKinley of Alabama recovered and is doing well after doctors pronounced him “brain dead” and “his organs were matched to five children who needed them”, never mind the fact that he needed them himself.

There is also the aborted fetuses trade, which includes corrupt organizations such as the NIH and Planned Parenthood; both of which have been exposed for what I, and many others, consider crimes against humanity:

“David Daleiden, founder and president of The Center for Medical Progress, states, “The NIH grant application for just one of Pitt’s numerous experiments with aborted infants reads like an episode of American Horror Story. Infants in the womb, some old enough to be viable, are being aborted alive and killed for organ harvesting, in order to bring in millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Pitt and the Planned Parenthood abortion business it supports.”Aborted Infants’ Continued Blood Flow Advertised in Racist University of Pittsburgh Grant Application to NIH

With these serious ethical concerns and implications, we have to really reflect on whether it is worth it to potentially be taking another person’s life to save our own, even if we are not fully cognizant of this fact. While I’m sure many of us are assured that the organ donor does not feel or suffer any of the procedures, unless we are actually under the knife, there is no way to know for sure. And the guilt that one may feel knowing that the person could have died while still having a chance to recover would undoubtedly weigh on some consciences.

Blood donors (again, from who…?)

Now, while not only considering organ donations to save or extend our life, we have to also address the practice of blood transfusions as well.

Again, the possibility of underhanded dealings in the black market and criminal enterprises needs to be mentioned.

As many may be familiar with, Silicon Valley is largely composed of a technocratic, transhumanist industry who is helping to usher us all in the “great reset”, biotech age; whether we like it or not.

In an endeavor that I have mentioned a few times before, because I am haunted by the stark coldness and unfeeling ramifications that it would most likely entail, is a statement from the Newsweek article titled, “Can Blood from Young People Slow Aging? Silicon Valley Has Bet Billions It Will“:

“One chilling missive came from a man who offered to provide all the blood Wyss-Coray might need for such an experiment—he claimed he could obtain it from human children of any age.”

In my opinion, this admission should be investigated to the fullest degree. I fail to see how this is even possible, unless one has a huge bank of blood already from “human children of any age”… or whether they can procure this amount through whatever means they have available to them – which again, raises severe alarm bells.

Either way, it is a grisly and sinister agenda. And the purpose for what this “young blood” will be used for, to keep the older generations alive and feeling young, is something right out of a dystopian playbook.

As Nir Barzilai puts it, “You have no idea how many people are interested to investing money in longevity,” said Nir Barzilai, the founding director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and the founder of a company aimed at mitochondrial health. “There are billions of dollars.”

What’s in it for me?

Now that I’m finished talking about the ethical considerations (for now), it’s time to tackle why the recipient may not be getting off scott-free either. (Besides the medical bill, of course.)

Since the recipient will be under the knife and therefore have no idea what, exactly, is being transplanted/transfused into their body, and since many of us know how complicit some health/medical institutions really are, we have to wonder – not only how healthy the organ/blood being donated is, but also if the recipient is not subjected to an experiment as well.

Some, like David Bennett, consented to giving a very risky trial run to have a pig heart implanted in him. Not just any pig heart. A genetically modified one.

“In a medical first, doctors transplanted a pig heart into a patient in a last-ditch effort to save his life and a Maryland hospital said Monday that he’s doing well three days after the highly experimental surgery.

While it’s too soon to know if the operation really will work, it marks a step in the decades-long quest to one day use animal organs for life-saving transplants. Doctors at the University of Maryland Medical Center say the transplant showed that a heart from a genetically modified animal can function in the human body without immediate rejection.

The patient, David Bennett, 57, knew there was no guarantee the experiment would work but he was dying, ineligible for a human heart transplant and had no other option, his son told The Associated Press.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

Again, the desperation to cling so tightly to one’s own life may compel them to make decisions they may later on regret. Turning yourself into a genetically modified organism might trend highly on that list. David Bennett had this to say on his decision:

“It was either die or do this transplant. I want to live. I know it’s a shot in the dark, but it’s my last choice,” Bennett said a day before the surgery, according to a statement provided by the University of Maryland School of Medicine.”

Doctors transplant a genetically modified pig heart into a human for the 1st time

This procedure has effectively, in a sense, created a human-animal hybrid. A genetically modified human hybrid.

That was David’s choice.

But what if you had no choice?

Far be it for me to assume that organ/blood recipients have not been getting all their donated organs/blood transfusions in a kosher manner… Already, there are attempts at not only implanting genetically modified animal parts in human being, but there are also endeavors to implant synthetic organisms/organs into us as well.

While history dictates that the government and mad scientists have taken certain liberties with their citizen’s bodies and lives, we have to wonder if there are even more clandestine operations hidden in the background that we are not aware of.

Now, even if these speculations are not true, what IS true is that there is a highly dangerous, suspicious “vaccine” containing mRNA and which have admissions that it does, indeed, modify our cells.

“Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cellular gene therapy. I always like to say, if we had surveyed 2 years ago, in the public, would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy, and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.

I think this pandemic has also opened many people’s eyes to innovation in the way that was maybe not possible before.”

CEO of Big Pharma Bayer “mRNA vaccines are an example of cellular gene therapy”

So with that in mind, how would vaccinated individual’s organs and blood be, not only in the short term, but in the long term as well? There has already been a sudden increase in blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocardial  infarctions, neurological symptoms, miscarriages/stillbirths, cancers, etc., etc., etc. reported by Thomas Renz/DoD due to the vaccine intake.

Now imagine getting an organ/blood transfusion from a vaccinated individual with these conditions? And do we have a say in whose organs/blood we get in order to save ours or a loved one’s life? And even if they assure us that it is completely healthy and safe, are we really going to take the word of the same organizations who have assured us that brain dead individuals have no chance of recovery, only to have that same person wake up in the morgue?

This is all without even considering that the vaccines may, in fact, be injecting us with nanochip technology, hydrogels, graphene oxide, etc. in attempts at connecting us to a control-power grid. And as mentioned earlier, synthetic organ creations seem to be the next step in evolution for these “biomedical” technocrats, working on 3d printing organs like the heart, out of, again, their wonder material: hydrogel.

So now we have to consider whether we are okay with being a potentially genetically modified, human-animal hybrid, with synthetic (and possibly deadly) materials inside of us. In order to sustain/extend our life. Rather than “Godspeed” to the Lord.

This is, of course, not to say you would not want to find relief for yourself or a loved one who is suffering, but the serious subject matter of changing our natural, human born genetics with that of unnatural/man-made substances and mutation with animal DNA should be highly examined.

For those with (and without…) Biblical inclinations, there are specific verses that addresses this:

“But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. For not all flesh is the same, but there is one kind for humans, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.”1 Corinthians 15:38-39

“Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.”Romans 1:22

“So God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.”Genesis 6:12

What’s in the blood?

So, now we get to, what was the initial reason why I decided to approach this topic to begin with?

Again, because of the testimony of Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov. In his life, he refused to get a blood transfusion because, as he claimed it, the sins of the blood could be transferred to the recipient.

It may seem like an outlandish claim.

However, there are some scientific literature to back this up, as eerie as it sounds.

blood carries a person’s DNA, the signature that is supposed to be unique to their body.”

Scientific American explains that when donor blood is mixed into the body with a transfusion, that person’s DNA will be present in your body for some days”

“That publication notes studies have shown that highly sensitive equipment can pick up donor DNA from blood transfusions up to a week after the procedure, but with particularly large transfusions, donor white blood cells were present for up to a year and a half afterward.”

Source: How Does A Blood Transfusion Change Your Body And DNA?

And in this 2017 study, the conclusion these scientists/doctors came to is that they are considering having physicians receive informed consent from the recipient before agreeing to the transfusion because of this possible personality change:

“In conclusion, our results showed that the majority of the subjects could conceive that RBC transfusion might transmit some of the donor’s traits. Furthermore, three subjects out of seven indicated that they had perceived changes in behaviors or values after their own RBC transfusion. Better understanding the frequency and importance of these perceived changes is important as physicians might have to include such information while getting informed consent for transfusion.”

Source: Perceived changes in behavior and values after a red blood cell transfusion

Organ transplants are no different, and have been documented for decades, according to the following pubmed article:

“Personality changes following heart transplantation, which have been reported for decades, include accounts of recipients acquiring the personality characteristics of their donor.”

“Four categories of personality changes are discussed in this article: (1) changes in preferences, (2) alterations in emotions/temperament, (3) modifications of identity, and (4) memories from the donor’s life. The acquisition of donor personality characteristics by recipients following heart transplantation is hypothesized to occur via the transfer of cellular memory, and four types of cellular memory are presented: (1) epigenetic memory, (2) DNA memory, (3) RNA memory, and (4) protein memory.”

Implications for the future of heart transplantation are explored including the importance of reexamining our current definition of death, studying how the transfer of memories might affect the integration of a donated heart, determining whether memories can be transferred via the transplantation of other organs, and investigating which types of information can be transferred via heart transplantation. Further research is recommended.”

Source: Personality changes following heart transplantation: The role of cellular memory

In another startling account, a recipient of a liver transplant was documented as having not only a complete change in blood type, but she acquired the immune system of her donor as well…

In a recent case of possible cell memory, Australian girl Demi-Lee Brennan’s blood group was changed after receiving a liver transplant from her donor, reports the AFP. Nine months after the initial transplant, doctors discovered that Brennan had changed blood types and she acquired the immune system of the donor due to the stem cells of her new liver transferring over to her bone marrow. “In effect she had had a bone marrow transplant. The majority of her immune system had also switched over to that of the donor,” Michael Stormon, a hepatologist who treated Brennan at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, reported to the AFP.

Source: Can An Organ Transplant Change A Recipient’s Personality? Cell Memory Theory Affirms ‘Yes’

It amazes me that this foresight came from a 10 year-old child, who chose to end his life, rather than receive a potential change in personality and genetic make up.

And we have to wonder, what is the risk when it comes to this incredibly sensitive topic? What if our little one was sick, dying of leukemia? I can’t imagine how heartbreaking that would be, yet people go through these types of sorrow everyday. And on one hand I understand their heartfelt desperation at keeping their loved one alive, but again, at what cost?

Again, this is not to presume, or cast judgement, only to bring this topic to light in a different perspective. Perhaps we’re clinging on to life so hard, that we forget and/or ignore that this is only a temporary life/death. Even doctors/scientists/skeptics are having to come around to the mystery of the consciousness, and that there is more to this life than meets the eye.

“If you try to hang on to your life, you will lose it. But if you give up your life for my sake and for the sake of the Good News, you will save it.” – Mark 8:35

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay