whistleblower Archives - Expanding Awareness Relations

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths

America’s Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.

Reblogged from globalresearch.ca/childrenshealthdefense:
Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC Is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths
by Megan Redshaw on July 20, 2021

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

America’s Frontline Doctors filed a motion to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines for anyone under 18, anyone with natural immunity or anyone who hasn’t received informed consent.

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) filed a motion July 19, seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop the use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID vaccines — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) — for three groups of Americans.

According to a press release, AFLDS is asking to immediately stop administration of experimentalCOVID vaccines in anyone 18 and younger, all those who have recovered from COVID and acquired natural immunity, and every other American who has not received informed consent as defined by federal law.

The 67-page motion requests the judge issue a preliminary injunction pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C) for the following reasons:

There is no emergency, which is a prerequisite to issuing EUA and EUA renewals for COVID vaccines.
There is “no serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”
Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
Known and potential risks of the vaccine outweigh their known and potential benefits.
There are adequate, approved and available alternatives to vaccines.
Healthcare professionals and vaccine candidates are not adequately informed.

The authors of the motion attached a declaration by a whistleblower who came forward alleging deaths occurring within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine are significantly under-reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

As of July 9, reported deaths in the VAERS totaled 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within 72-hours of vaccination.

The whistleblower — a computer programmer who developed more than 100 distinct healthcare fraud algorithms, and who has expertise in healthcare data analytics that allows her to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) — filed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury alleging the actual number of COVID vaccine-related deaths is closer to 45,000.

The whistleblower alleged that VAERS, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least five.

In her statement, she said:

“On July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these numbers by collating all of the data from VAERS myself, not relying on a third party to report them. In tandem, I queried data from CMS medical claims with regard to vaccines and patient deaths, and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000. Put in perspective, the swine flu vaccine was taken off the market which only resulted in 53 deaths.”

AFLDS said the findings were shocking, and informed consent is impossible when safety data is not accurate.

In a press release, AFLDS said:

“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to administer experimental agents to individuals who cannot make an informed decision as to the true benefits and risks to the vaccine on an independent basis. They must be of an age or a capacity to make informed decisions and have been provided with all of the risk/benefit information necessary to make an informed decision.”

One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the press release:

“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we allowing to control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain bleeding and even died! I have had enough. I am not sacrificing my child so a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”

There is no emergency warranting EUA of COVID vaccines, plaintiffs allege

According to the complaint, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, declared on Feb. 4, 2020, pursuant to § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C), that SARS-CoV-2 created a “public health emergency.”

This initial emergency declaration has been renewed repeatedly and remains in force today — a necessary legal prerequisite for the issuance of vaccine EUAs, the complaint states. EUA allowed the mass use of the vaccines by the American public before the completion of the standard regimen of clinical trials and FDA approval.

Plaintiffs allege the emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal because there is no underlying emergency. Using HHS COVID death data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70. This is consistent with the seasonal flu, the complaint states.

Plaintiffs argue HHS deliberately inflated COVID case data

Plaintiffs allege HHS’ data is deliberately inflated. On March 24, 2020, HHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations exclusively for COVID.

The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”

According to the complaint, HHS statistics showed 95% of deaths classified as “COVID-19 deaths” involved an average of four additional comorbidities. Plaintiffs claim the CDC knew the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death would result in COVID being the underlying cause more often than not.

Plaintiffs said the actual number of COVID cases is also far lower than the reported number due to emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, which are used as a diagnostic tool for COVID. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package inserts state PCR tests should not be used to diagnose COVID.

The complaint alleges the way in which the PCR tests are being administered knowingly guarantees an unacceptably high number of false positive results.

COVID vaccine risks undisclosed and under-reported, lawsuit says

AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the accumulated COVID vaccine risk data and found migration of the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. Yet vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint states.

AFLDS researchers analyzed VAERS and discovered an increased risk of death from COVID vaccines. The database indicated vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represented a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year.

From 2009 to 2019, there were 1529 reported deaths associated with all vaccines reported to VAERS, according to the motion. In the first quarter of 2021, there were more than 4,000 reported deaths with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% were attributed to other vaccines in the system.

Plaintiffs also disclosed evidence of reproductive harm, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological damage and they highlighted an increased risk of harm for children with COVID vaccines to support their position.

Why the secrecy around V-Safe data?

The complaint called attention to the secrecy of the CDC’s V-Safe system — a parallel system used to track reported adverse events via a smartphone app controlled exclusively by the CDC.

Plaintiffs raised concerns that information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it potentially includes fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government is failing to provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS and the military.

Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they can’t help but wonder why HHS would fail to disclose to the public critical information related to risk from it’s reporting systems, “particularly in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to study and extend the authorizations on the vaccines, build an enormous vaccine marketing machine and roll out vaccine clinics all over the nation.”

The lawsuit was filed by several law firms, including RENZ Law. The complaint and whistleblower declaration can be read here.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.

Featured image is from CHD

Two Whistleblowers from Facebook Expose Worldwide Effort to Censor Vaccine Concerns

Project Veritas releases new leaked information.

Ever wonder why certain posts you share on facebook, instagram, youtube, etc. never get much attention? Or perhaps get deleted altogether?

With the rollout of these covid “vaccines”, the tech industries have been hard at work aiming to discredit and/or ban ANYONE who has announced a certain form of “hesitancy” or flat out refusal to be a part of the vaccine bandwagon.

And even if certain individuals DID take the vaccine, and only wanted to share their testimony on the side effects, or perhaps a statement of what happened to their friend or family member, Facebook has initiated a global ranking and employee driven effort to tag specific posts that cross a certain threshold of “vaccine hesitancy”.

Even if the data that is being shared is TRUE, and come from verifiable health/medical papers and documents, if the data veers more towards an unflattering light of the vaccines, it is being targeted and consequently censored from these huge tech platforms. Which obviously deters the truth about the covid vaccines from getting out.

Yesterday, May 24, 2021, Project Veritas uploaded a video and a post highlighting two Facebook employees that have come out against this egregious abuse of private companies’ being able to dictate what information is allowed to be seen and what should be hidden in order to support certain agendas. The aim to target the “vaccine hesitant” is just one of them.

Here is James O’Keefe discussing the leak with Fox’s Sean Hannity:

Source: odysee | Project Veritas | O’Keefe joins Hannity to discuss Veritas’ NEW BOMBSHELL Two-Whistleblower story from within Facebook

Sean Hannity: “Now let’s turn to a brand new investigative report from Project Veritas just uncovering an algorithm that reportedly could be used to target facebook’s political enemies. Now, Fox news, we’re just seeing this for the first time, but as always, we let you decide. Listen, to this.”

Whistleblower #1: “Facebook uses classifiers in their algorithms to determine certain content, to be what they call “vaccine hesitant”, or they call it “vaccine hesitancy”. And without the user’s knowledge, they assign a score to these comments that’s called the VH score, the “vaccine hesitancy” score. And then based on that score will demote or leave the comment alone depending on the content within the comment. And that narrative being, get the vaccine… the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it.”

Sean Hannity: “Here now, is the founder and CEO, Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Okay, there’s a lot of significance to this, and, facebook has responded. I’ll let you tell the story.”

James O’Keefe: “Thanks, Sean. We’ve had two whistleblowers within facebook, come to us and leak us these documents regarding “vaccine hesitancy”.

What does that mean? Essentially facebook has beta tested this, these algorithms, 1.5 percent of their almost 3 billion users are getting a tiered ranking system, something called “vaccine hesitancy” – tier 1 and tier 2. Tier 1 is alarmist and critical remarks about covid and the vaccine, and tier 2 is something called “indirect vaccine discouragement”.

Now what’s remarkable about these private documents that facebook has not wanted you to see, until tonight, is that tier 2 says that even if the facts are true, that you will be targeted and demoted. Your comments will be targeted and demoted, Sean. “Vaccine hesitancy” score tiering system at facebook – these whistleblowers have given Project Veritas these documents and spoken to us in the shadows. It’s a 20 minute long video online, the documents are on our website.

And Sean, after we publish this report, we reached out to facebook, they’ve actually given us a comment – I’m going to read it to you, it says, quote, facebook has responded to Project Veritas for the first time, quote, “We proactively announce this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.” So as, in response to us publishing this, they’re claiming to now make this public but we just checked, and they haven’t yet made most of these documents public, Sean.”

Sean: “Okay, do I, knowing your ammo, is there more to come in the days to come?”

James: “Yes, there’s more to come. What’s remarkable about it, is that this has been private, they don’t want you to know that they’re doing this, and this is the town square, as you all know. We’re trying to retake our town square. Governor deSantis just signed a bill in Florida; I’m in Florida today, I was with him when he did that.

But they’re (facebook) tiering users without them knowing that they’re doing it. They’re demoting your comments, deboosting you on facebook without you knowing that they’re doing that.

And they’re obviously terrified of this report because they’re actually responding to Project Veritas – before they would attack us, or ignore us. And they have this system, you can see the documents online. They clearly have a ranking system, a tiered system, Sean. The author of this report we’ve named him, Amit Bahl, is an employee at facebook, we have the document showing that he authored the report and the chain of command from him to Mark Zuckerberg.

So there’s more to come, another one tomorrow. Two whistleblowers, on the record with Project Veritas, current facebook insiders, leaking us these documents. We consider them brave heroes and we hope that there’s a legion of more insiders that follow their lead, coming public to projectveritastips@protonmail.com with this information.”

Sean: “James O’Keefe, thank you for sharing with us, we appreciate it, we’re going to follow closely.”

Here is the Project Veritas video that was uploaded yesterday featuring one of the whistleblowers who came forward to reveal facebook’s tiering system plan:

Source: odysee | Project Veritas | Facebook Whistleblowers LEAK DOCS Detailing Effort to Secretly Censor Vax Concerns on Global Scale

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

“I have to do something.”

“When it comes time to standing up for a world, I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties.”

“People aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice.”

“They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it.”

“If I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “We have just obtained multiple leaked documents from inside facebook, this time detailing a plan to curb, quote, “vaccine hesitancy” on a global scale. It was so concerning it brought us not one, but two whistleblowers from inside facebook who are ready to speak out on what this means for free speech and public discourse on their own platform.”

Interview with first whistleblower starts @1:00:

Whistleblower #1 (Data Center Technician):

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Our first facebook insider is a data center technician who leaked us multiple internal documents detailing an algorithm test being run on 1.5 percent of facebook and instagram’s nearly 3.8 billion users worldwide.

The goal? To quote, “Drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine hesitancy (VH) in comments”.

Whistleblower #1: “And it’s the same thing. You’ll see a lot of this difference in their public policy verses the private policy where the public policy is very vague. It’s very ambiguous. It’s designed to be questioned because it’s designed to be able to easily defend. But then if look at the private policy, it’s much, much more clear, much more specific. I think that they’re trying to make it seem like they’re not doing as much or that they’re just kind of like generalizing it, like, “Oh, well we just have some robot that just tags your post. And then, you know, we look at it.” but I think they don’t want people to know, “Oh no, we actually have something that we made specifically for vaccine hesitancy.”

So there’s a main document along with all the, all the attachments and stuff that goes with it. So basically when they write this algorithm that goes through facebook content, and it looks for certain keywords that are related to vaccination, or, you know, not getting a vaccine and stuff like that. And it gives it a score. And the VH score means vaccine hesitancy, which is defined as being hesitant to get a vaccine, but not just like, “Well, I don’t know.” It’s even, “Well, I saw a study that said that someone died that got the vaccine.” That’s vaccine hesitancy.”

James O’Keefe: “So this is a beta test. This is all a beta test.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right, right.”

James: “And how big is this beta test?”

Whistleblower #1: “They refer to the test size as 1.5%. I’m not exactly sure which pool that pulls from, but I think it’s comments on authoritative health pages.”

James: “You seem to think that they’ve already ruled this out. Why do we believe they’ve already ruled this out?”

Whistleblower #1: “In one slideshow that they have, they call it their weekly progress tracker. They actually lay all this out in a chart and you can see it, you can look at the slides, they go by date. So we’ve got here – Covid-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy “Global”, “Currently Global” 13 languages, facebook plus instagram. All C-19 Vaccine [Global], “Currently Global” 66 languages. And the very first thing that brought me to the conclusion that they’re wanting to do this globally is they were developing it in like, you know, as many languages as they can get their hands on.”

James: “So this is like a product launch, almost?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yeah, in their last quarterly report, they reported 2.79 billion people on Earth use some kind of facebook app.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Who’s behind this new algorithm policy? Well, one thing is for sure, the authors of this experiment Joo Ho Yeo, Nick Gibian, Hendrick Townley, Amit Bahl, and Matt Gilles are not low-level employees. In fact, one of the internal documents Project Veritas obtained was a facebook flow chart that showed they’re only a few clicks away from Mark Zuckerberg, himself.”

James: “Who makes these decisions?”

Whistleblower #1: “These are teams at facebook and they call themselves, they work with what they call B2V “Barriers to Vaccination”. So that’s one of their core terms – is Barriers to Vaccination. And then the people on these teams, they call them Health Integrity Teams. So there’s a Health Integrity Team for messenger, there’s a Health Integrity Team for every system that facebook has.”

James: “An integrity team?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “Is it came about after March 2020 – covid?”

Whistleblower #1: “No.”

James: “This is something that’s existed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “So, the Health Integrity Teams, and Barrier to Vaccination Teams at facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this here, Amit Bahl, he is a Research Scientist for the Core Data Science Team at facebook. He also works in Health Integrity. Everyone who works on this project works in Health Integrity. Hendrick Townley, this is the experiment launch post, as you can see, this is on April 16th. This is 2021. That why there’s no year there. Cause it’s this year. And Hendrick Townley is one of the Software Engineers that worked on this. There were – I think it was him and two other software engineers. And then Amit Bahl wrote the actual classifier itself. I don’t – I’m sure he had like a team of developers, but he is considered the one who wrote it. Amit Bahl, and then as you go up, it’s like his boss, boss’s boss. Boss’s boss’s boss.”

James: “So Amit Bahl works for Udi Weinsberg, who works for Nicolas Stier – do I have that correct?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “And that person works for Danny Ferrante, and that person works for Javier Olivan, and Javier Olivan reports directly to Mark Zuckerberg.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “So this is a chain that goes all the way down to Amit Bahl.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This kind of censorship sounds similar to shadowbanning – when users are unaware their posts can’t be seen. A term one of our own investigations coined when exposing twitter, just a few years ago. But this time, we’re exposing facebook and instagram’s methods to quash an entire side of a conversation. Arguably, one of the most pressing issues of the day.”

James: “According to these documents, facebook tiers users, 0 to 5, and a score of 0 to 1. Can you talk a little bit about this tier system?”

Whistleblower #1: “Oh yeah. So basically this is what they’re using to structure how, how they’re going to judge this content on, on a scale to how vaccine hesitant it actually is, or if it’s explicitly discouraging. In my opinion, the main reason why they built this as was for the human, what they call “raters” so that they can use this as a reference when they, so if the algorithm can’t make a decision on a certain post, it’ll send it to a human rater and then the human rater looks at it and they will make a decision on whether or not it’s vaccine hesitant or not.”

James: “So we have tier 2 – Indirect Discouragement. What happens when you are a tier 2?”

Whistleblower #1: “So basically your comment is going to be suppressed. As to the scale of that suppression, it’s hard to say, we would have to look at it like a case by case basis. But what they’re saying is it’s going to get, they call it a position change – on some of these comments, you can see, it’ll say position change: seven. And I’m not sure whether the seven refers to like a 7% or if it’s just like seven positions down in the comment chains.”

James: “So it’s suppressed?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “But we don’t know the extent of this suppression?”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “And we’ve heard “shadowban”, we’ve heard “deboost”, I have not heard “position change”.

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Facebook has not been shy about combating “vaccine hesitancy” as reported in their own press release stated May 11 of this year. However, what they say publicly in their own policy doesn’t scratch the surface of what is written in these internal leaked documents. By the facebook whistleblower.”

James: “If I read this correctly, facebook is saying it doesn’t matter if the story is true, so long as it doesn’t cause people to hesitate getting the vaccine? What’s your read on this?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘The Borderline Vaccine Framework – Shocking Stories: Potentially, or actually true events or facts that can raise safety concerns.’ “

James: “That post was done by a user. And they’ve taken a screenshot and observed it for the tier system.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right. Yeah.”

James: “What about this gives them alarm?”

Whistleblower #1: ” ‘How is this not scary?’ That would be considered indirect discouragement.”

James: “Indirect discouragement. Which would be considered tier 2.”

Whistleblower #1: “Right.”

James: “So this is an example of indirect discouragement of the vaccine.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Questioning the vaccine, questioning anything involving the vaccine.”

James: “And this was then demoted.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah.”

James: “So this is another example of tier 2 indirect discouragement – why don’t you tell us why this would be indirect discouragement, according to facebook.”

Whistleblower #1: “So this would be considered “vaccine hesitant” because they don’t want people to see someone had a bad effect. They’re not saying, “Don’t get the vaccine,” but they’re saying, “Look at all this negative stuff that happened after I got the vaccine.”

James: “Okay, they’re reporting facts, but truth doesn’t matter.”

Whistleblower #1: “No, because it doesn’t match the narrative. So, and the narrative being: Get the vaccine, the vaccine is good for you. Everyone should get it. And if you don’t, you will be singled out… as an enemy of society.

So the VAERS is a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It looks like they’re measuring the comments where they’re mentioning, you know, that the patient died.”

James: “So is VAERS a CDC supported program?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes, I think so. Really they support all of this because you know, they released the standards, the CDC themselves. And that’s really one of, one of the primary things that facebook is basing their policy off of is, well, if you looked at their public policy, it would be according to the authoritative health pages.”

James: “So they are open about the fact that they essentially coordinate with the CDC, here.”

Whistleblower #1: “Of course.”

James: “From the internal document, ‘Content pointing to the Vaccine Adverse Effects [Events] Reporting System data that suggest extreme risks without providing full context’ – full context… What do they mean by that?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think so, like in the previous comments, like she said, “Oh, during this study 653 people died” and then they don’t put the rest of the study in there. It’s like, okay, so you want me to write like a 10-page comment? What’s full context? Another ambiguous term. If they saw a study from someone they didn’t like, would they say, “Well, that’s not the full context because ABCDEFG.”

James: “Ultimately it seems like any facts that escape a particular narrative are omitted, demoted, deboosted, banned…”

Whistleblower #1: “Absolutely. Yes.”

James: “Considered dangerous to society.”

Whistleblower #1: “Suppressed in any way possible.”

James: “Where do you think this is headed? Does it get worse from here?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes.”

James: “How so?”

Whistleblower #1: “I think people accept it and they see people like twitter, facebook, google, and stuff like that, they see that this is accepted by the public and then they go, that’s like a green light to be like, “Oh, well we can go ahead and do this more.” So not only are we going to start doing vaccines stuff, we’re going to spread it to everything. So we’re going to start saying, “Oh if you make a post that could put somebody in danger or it could compromise someone’s safety,” whatever that means, “then we’re going to go ahead and look at that and assign that a score of some unknown classifier.” Who knows what it could be. They’re trying to control this content before it even makes it onto your page before you even see it. And when you’re scrolling on your phone, I think they’re afraid of what people would conclude.”

James: “Tell me they don’t think about the underlying value.”

Whistleblower #1: “Yeah. Or what could, what it could turn into: the slippery slope.”

James: “They’re not even thinking about that.”

Whistleblower #1: “Nope.”

James: “And do you think there’s a lot of people inside facebook that agree with you or some percentage? What would you estimate that number of people to be?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. I would say at least 25%.”

James: “So you’re telling me, that 25% of the people there, agree that what they’re doing with this vaccine hesitancy coding and algorithms, is morally wrong?”

Whistleblower #1: “Yes. That would not surprise me at all. The policy is going to keep expanding until anything can violate it. What would happen if this was scaled larger and scaled to twitter and the internet as a whole is way worse than anything that could happen from me getting fired from my job. To me, that, it far outweighs that. Because it’s about more than me. It’s about really everyone in the world.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “It’s clear this facebook insider is not alone in his concerns of facebook’s new policy that would promote discourse on vaccines in general. As a matter of fact, the next insider you’re about to meet, felt so compelled to come forward, he goes so far as to compare the new policy to an abusive relationship.”

Interviewer with second whistleblower starts @11:58:

Whistleblower #2 (Data Center Engineer):

James: “What do you do at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a data center engineer.

I’d say that in a sense it’s prohibiting people from being able to have an open dialogue about issues that affect their personal security. Some of these things, the questions, the comments that are being presented, you know, are from people that have concerns about their personal health or their personal security being affected. It’s kind of like having a relationship with somebody that’s controlling and abusive in a sense like an abusive partner, not allowing their spouse to speak out about the things that are going on in their marriage or their relationship and limiting their voice. It’s very damaging from that sense. You know, if you think about this logically, it just, you know, it’s very incriminating in my opinion.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Just months ago, the same insider leaked us a tape of Mark Zuckerberg privately speaking to his team last July, showcasing his own vaccine hesitancy when talking about covid.”

Inside clip of Mark Zuckerberg on July 16, 2020: “I just want to make sure that I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “Today, his own words would violate their new public policy.”

James: “You were the source who brought us the Mark Zuckerberg vaccine footage from July 2020, is that correct?”

Whistleblower #2: “That’s correct.”

James: “Zuckerberg seemed to change his mind – evolve on the issue of vaccine, and the facebook policy itself would have prevented Zuckerberg from saying what it is he had said just a few months ago. Pretty crazy!

What prompted you to give that footage to Project Veritas?”

Whistleblower #2: “Well, based on my own knowledge and research of, you know, the adverse effects and the potential side effects of vaccines of any medication really. So I think it’s important for people to be understanding of the – of those facts. We’re able to have these conversations at work with our, with our coworkers about our medical decisions. And we do. We have them, you know, frequently.

Why is it okay for us to have these conversations at work as adults and not have somebody step in and say, “Hey, you need to stop talking about that and you shouldn’t talk about that. You’re not allowed to talk about – that’s ‘fact-checked’. That’s false.”

Occasionally people do, in the conversation, but, but we’re allowed to have open dialogue. And, and here – “

James: “You’re saying that you can have these conversations at the water cooler and office – “

Whistleblower #2: “Absolutely. Even in the midst of the office.”

James: “In the midst of the office?”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes.”

James: “At facebook, the location, facebook, but you’re not allowed to go onto facebook and write this stuff.”

Whistleblower #2: “No.”

James: “That’s ironic.”

Whistleblower #2: “It is very ironic.”

James: “What is your message to Mr. CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is certainly watching this video?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would ask, you said that you support freedom of expression. My question to you is, why, in a sense, you don’t support freedom of expression in the most basic sense, that’s available to all people everywhere: which is to exist as God created them – without any interference or intrusion by any corporation or government to exist as they are? And why push a narrative that it’s not okay for people to go ahead and exist to express themselves as God’s creation, without taking a vaccine? Why is there this push to suppress that ideology?”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “This insider’s biggest concern is facebook building a quote, “community of compliance”, unquote. And feels the topic may go beyond the authority of Zuckerberg himself.”

Whistleblower #2: “It’s the platform that they want to build. It’s the community that they want to build. They want to build a community where everybody complies, not where people can have open discourse and dialogue about the most personal and private and intimate decisions that anybody could ever face in their life, which regarding their own body, their own health.”

James: “And based upon your position, and what you’ve seen, and your role at facebook, why do they want people to comply? Why is that the culture at facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “For the promotion of a society that is focused on medical progress in a sense or medical, you know, medical experimentation.”

James: “What is facebook doing to promote covid vaccines to its billions of users?”

Whistleblower #2: “Specifically encouraging people to post, you know, to take on the profile frame for showing that they’ve been vaccinated and to promote in a sense, solidarity amongst other people that have taken the vaccine and encourage users to also go and get the vaccine. It’s interesting that they would, you know, encourage one side, but not allow the other side to speak of, you know, why they wouldn’t be making the decision to get a vaccine. There’s no solidarity, there’s no opportunity to be united around that. It’s just basically: Get the vaccine or feel left out.

You know, people aren’t allowed to have voice and yet, you know, facebook touts itself with promoting people’s opportunity to have voice. And, you know, as stated before, you know, have a voice about the most important decisions anyone has to face in their life is pretty important and it’s shocking and disturbing really to see people that are willing to go to the lengths of limiting those discussions around the world, you know, for things that, that concern people’s own personal security.

I almost feel like there’s, there’s outside sources pressuring Mark, or could be, I’m not saying that’s a fact, but you know, it does make me concerned. And, and you look at the video with Fauci and, you know, Mark discussing it, Mark doesn’t seem too pleased with you know, the fact that he had to bring it up. It’s almost like he was, you know, he had to mention it.”

James O’Keefe (narrating): “These two brave insiders know, that they risk it all standing against facebook – one of the most powerful institutions of the day. Yet, they are still putting it all on the line in order to preserve our liberties.”

Whistleblower #2: “I think that’s also the main reason why people don’t want to come out with it, because what if I, you know, I have, I had two kids, I have my wife and if I lose my job, it’s like, what do I do? But that’s less of a concern to me.”

James: “And the people who may do what you did, next, but they’re not sure if they should do it, what’s your message to those people?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say, go ahead and do it. And I – and then just think about what I said. There’s a lot of blowback to telling the truth. And that’s true, as far as human history is concerned. And yeah, you are going to receive blowback, but just weigh, weigh it out.

Can you live with yourself for the rest of your life if you work at facebook and you knew about this? Especially if it came out later and you’re like, “Man, I saw that so many times. I could have said something and I didn’t.” How are you going to feel about that? That’s my thing. My morality. I have to show somebody this because at least, even if nothing were to come of this, and for some reason everything was scrapped, I would still think that it, that it was worth it. Cause I’m like, well, at least I tried, I tried to show somebody this.”

James: “It’s almost like you’re saying that your desire to follow your conscience outweighs any potential risk there might be to you. Doing this.”

Whistleblower #2: “Yes. Yes.”

James: “What is your message to those people? That are watching this who agree with you inside facebook?”

Whistleblower #2: “I would say that you’re not alone. The biggest thing with social media, that we’ve seen throughout the years is that ranking people’s comments, their posts, even, even like news media, there’s this view that tries to make you think that you’re alone in this and that you’re not the majority. And even people that say that they agree with internally, they deal with struggles. Internally, they question things. It’s just that they’re not able to overcome that, that cognitive dissonance that sits in and they resort to what is safe. It’s easier to comply with things than it is to come forward and say, “This is wrong.” Or to really awaken to understanding that the way you’re being treated or the way other people are being treated is wrong.

And so that’s challenging, but know that you’re not alone. And that if you do come forward and you do speak up that you can live peacefully, knowing that you did the right thing, no matter what. And that’s encouraging, not just to other people, but it’s also encouraging to yourself. It’s an – and it won’t make you feel as alone anymore.”

James: “That’s very profound, I think.”

Whistleblower #2: “I’m a father. So, you know, obviously like I fear for my family, for my children’s safety. And, but I also understand that I have to, as I told, you know, my wife, I have to do something. You know, when it comes time to standing up for a world I want my children to live in, I don’t want to leave them a world to where they don’t have these liberties, these personal securities to where they can willingly make their own medical decisions between them, their doctor, and, those that are closest to them. That’s not something I can live in. That’s not something I could do. And it came down to the point where I had to make a decision to do what was right.”

After Project Veritas received the leaked documents, a team member from PV reached out to facebook for a response. Mario Balaban contacted a spokesperson to address a couple of questions about the “vaccine hesitancy” policy.

Rather than answering the questions, a facebook spokesperson responded with this line, “We proactively announced this policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this information.”

As of this moment, there is no indication that they have updated their policies regarding this information, and they did not respond back when Project Veritas requested a follow-up to answer the questions directed to them from the original email.

For more information and images of the documents that were leaked from the insiders, please visit Project Veritas’s website at:

BREAKING: Facebook Whistleblowers Expose LEAKED INTERNAL DOCS Detailing New Effort to Secretly Censor Vaccine Concerns on a Global Scale

Thank you to James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas team for going to such incredible lengths to get the Truth out to the public. Your hard work and dedication to these efforts are sincerely appreciated!

And a HUGE thank you to the brave individuals who have spoken out against these oppressive establishments and who are helping to expose the corruption within. Your honesty and integrity is greatly needed in these uncertain times.

Thank you!

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Featured image (slight alterations have been added – original artist created the “f” used in the image and not the addition of words) by kropekk_pl from Pixabay

Get an Earful

Vernon Coleman Speech at the London Worldwide Freedom Rally | July 24, 2021 - Dr. Vernon Coleman exposing COVID/vaccine corruption.

Federal Lawsuit Seeks Immediate Halt of COVID Vaccines, Cites Whistleblower Testimony Claiming CDC is Under-Counting Vaccine Deaths - America's Frontline Doctors addressing the fraudulent use of the EUA for COVID vaccines.

Dr. Peter McCullough Interview with Mike Adams | “All to prepare the population for mass vaccination.” [Transcript] - "It's astonishing how dangerous the vaccines are."

Might COVID Injections Reduce Lifespan? - "Yeadon, Montagnier, Zelenko and others are raising concerns about global genocide."

Reiner Fuellmich Clarifies Nuremberg Misunderstandings - Trials not underway... yet.

Scam of the Medical Industry and a Depopulation Agenda Revealed at the ITNJ - Robert O. Young's Testimony at the International Tribunal of Natural Justice

COVID Presenting Same Exact Symptoms as… THE COMMON COLD - We have been lied to on a MASSIVE SCALE; all to enforce the vaccine on us.

History is Repeating Itself: Fauci Was Accused of Genocide Almost 30 Years Ago - "The Greatest Lie Ever Told" ...until now.

NOT ON THE BEEB: Dr. T | Mask, Swabs, ‘Vaccine’, Magnetism & Genocide [Full Transcript] - Dr. T proposes a hypothesis that involves hydrogel and EMF.

CDC, FDA Prepare Mass Distribution of a Merck/Sanofi Six-in-One Vaccine for Kids, Turning Blind Eye to Safety Signals - Egregious oversteps endangering children's lives.

Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert Warned of Mind Control Vaccines in the 1990’s

And more ties to freemasonry.

I am honestly not trying to make deliberate connections from anything I research to freemasonry specifically.

However, I realize that this might have a very synchronous meaning in that the subjects that I am interested in uncovering, just so happen to lead to the same place – and that is freemasonry.

My last post, re-blogged from The Narrow Gate, dealt with pastor Billy Graham since a previous post I made mentioned Franklin Graham and his (incredibly misguided – or perhaps even intentional) advice that Jesus Christ would have wanted us to take this covid vaccine. This was such an obvious attempt at manipulation and deception, that I felt the need to investigate the Graham family further. I wish I could say I was surprised to see that there was a huge relation to freemasonry, but sadly, I was not.

The next item on my list to research further, is the liquid crystal phenomena since I referenced it from my post Magnets/Quarters Sticking to Arms and the connection to vaccines that Pierre Gilbert made in 1995. Which, after checking out the full speech that Pierre Gilbert made, was quite astonished that he made many references to freemasonry as well.

Thus, again, my research somehow leading me to freemasonry again with studying liquid crystals and it’s relation to the vaccine. Again, it is not my purpose to intentionally seek out this correlation. It is just, almost without fail, leading me in that direction. Does everything have a purpose? Is there a reason that this mysterious secret society is turning up in almost every major agenda that is being perpetrated behind the scenes?

Even Anthony Fauci, the talking head of the whole “coronavirus”/”vaccine” agenda has been seen (a couple of times, at least) implementing the hidden hand gesture that is a favorite of freemasons to signal to each other.

The implications of these situations are quite numerous to just be mere coincidence. When one delves deep into many of these occurrences and the organizations behind dictating a global dominance, the path becomes conspicuously clear.

Enter in Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert

I’ve already done a topic on Serge Monast’s famous Blue Beam Project disclosure, which you can read here: Blue Beam Project: What is it?, but lo and behold when I realized that he has also mentioned liquid crystals in relation to the vaccine – just like Pierre Gilbert did in 1995.

Source: odysee | Tim Truth | Dr Pierre Gilbert: Total Control Through Mandatory Vaccines Will Cause People Who Can’t Think To Become Zombies

English subtitles:

“In the biological destruction there are the organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is the contamination of the bloodstreams of mankind creating intentional infections. This will be enforced via laws that will make vaccination mandatory. And these vaccines will make possible to control people.

The vaccines will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become micro receivers of electromagnetic fields where waves of very, very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves people will be unable to think, you’ll be turned into a zombie.

Don’t think of this as an hypothesis… this has been done.” – Pierre Gilbert (1995)

Here is Serge Monast’s testimony, 2 years earlier on the liquid crystal vaccines:

Serge Monast 1993: on 2 phase liquid crystal vaccines cut in 2 which reassembles at the 2nd vaccine

The journalist asks: “Do you have other files that you have looked through?”

Serge Monast: “Yes, there is the dossier that I am starting to write next week, and it is a dossier which concerns vaccines, experimental military medicine and liquid crystals.

It’s because I was talking about the different developments in military research produced by the CIA in the United States in terms of vaccines and things like that. And I said listen, it appears from the surveys and results obtained to date that it is possible

It is possible to administer a vaccine, inside of which there does not appear to be anything apparently and which is not offensive to health, in any way.

But on the other hand, the same vaccine, because of its ill-defined content, put in relation a year or 2 years later with another vaccine, which too, seems harmless at first sight, But, the two combined together will produce implausible problems.

And I recently knew that it was possible, without this being necessarily detected at the level of scientific analysis, that it was possible to cut in half a liquid crystal, to put part of it in a vaccine, and a year or 2 years later, the second part is found in another vaccine. The combination of the two, with the information I have at the liquid crystal level, allows the control of individuals, via satellite in order to arrive, at some point, in absolute political control over populations.”

What are these “liquid crystals” that Gilbert and Monast claim will be put into vaccines to control the population?

Here’s one interesting link, that may or may not have anything to do with the predictions of Gilbert and Monast, but is very interesting and relevant reading in any case, and may provide answers as to what these “liquid crystals” can do:

“Living liquid crystals are an example of materials that can act on their own. In nature, these materials are responsible for the motility of cells. Proteins within the cells “walk” along the surface of polymer molecules and exert a force that causes displacement and motion.

“There is a lot of interest in these materials because they are complex, beautiful and relevant,” said de Pablo, vice president for national laboratories. “But we want to understand just how motion and transport are generated within them.”

In the lab, one way to create an autonomous material like this is to combine a liquid crystal with bacteria, which then cause disorder among the liquid crystal when they move.

To study how the material becomes active, the researchers combined swimming bacteria with a liquid crystal in two formats: near the bottom surface of a drop suspended from a needle attached to a glass slide, and in a thin, freestanding film.

Though the bacteria and liquid crystal were initially aligned through a magnetic field, when the field was turned off, the bacteria began to move on their own,” –

“Now we truly understand how this process works, which will ultimately lead to controlling how this material behaves.”
— Prof. Juan de Pablo

Controlling crystals for future technologies

The researchers hope to use this information to be able to fully control these living liquid crystals. That would allow them to eventually create a new kind of microfluidic device that transports fluids autonomously without pumps or pressure, or to create synthetic systems that resemble cells and that could move autonomously from one place to another.

“We have a real possibility to control these materials and use them for interesting new technologies,” de Pablo said.”

Source: Scientists harness bacteria to create ‘living’ liquid crystals (2019)

Hm… it sounds eerily similar to what Mr. Monast and Mr. Gilbert have been talking about OVER 20 YEARS AGO.

Now, I want to mention one other name that both Serge Monast and Pierre Gilbert mentioned in at least one of their speech.

Texe Marrs.

It’s strange that both Monast and Gilbert referenced this man. Perhaps because they realized that Mr. Marrs was speaking about many truths, though we may not want to believe him. Yes, his material is highly controversial, and that’s the point. Some of the conspiracies he proposes are so far beyond a normal human being’s willingness to comprehend, that some will just automatically dismiss his statements as that coming from a madman. And THAT’S WHY whistleblowers are so hard to believe in a lot of instances. It is OUR unwillingness to believe that something so sinister and evil could possibly ever take hold on our planet and in the hearts of men.

People, these evil and wicked tendencies have been here since the beginning of humankind. One could debate as to the true origin of where it came from or from what it was created, but there is EVIL in the hearts of men and the sooner we realize that, the better we can understand where this agenda to control the whole population comes from.

And when people are consistently revealing that the organizations behind these heinous plans all seem to come from the freemasons, and their history goes back as far back to Nimrod/Babylon and perhaps even further beyond that, and their animosity is aimed towards Jesus Christ – inverting everything that is holy to that of sin and wickedness – then perhaps we can finally set aside our own pride and ego, and REALLY start listening to these brave people trying to expose these malevolent societies/industries.

– Deadly Vaccines of the New World Order – Texe Marrs
– Is Freemasonry the Very Synagogue of Satan – Texe Marrs

Unfortunate (and suspicious) deaths

Sadly, Serge Monast passed away shortly after revealing these insidious plots, allegedly from a heart complication – and right after he had his children taken away, simply for homeschooling them.

The timing of his death is incredibly ironic; and especially when one considers that Texe Marrs – (who describes initiatives that ARE NOT A “CONSPIRACY THEORY” – the people and groups involved have ADMITTED that this is their goal) – died a few months before this “coronavirus” outbreak in December 2019. Would it be presumptuous of me to assume that Mr. Marrs would be one of the hugest proponents of speaking out against these “vaccines”?

Then when we take a look at the suspicious timing of Mr. Kary Mullis’ death in August 2019 – who most assuredly would have been speaking out against Fauci and the PCR tests – seeing as how Mullis HIMSELF INVENTED THEM – and knew exactly what they were for (and it’s NOT for detecting viruses), and who was also against Fauci, it wouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination to predict that he would be speaking out against this vaccination plan as well.

Hence, why these gentlemen are no longer with us. Am I insinuating that these gentlemen were “killed off” so that they wouldn’t be alerting the public to these highly dangerous and ill-begotten vaccines?

Why, yes. Yes I am.

There’s been a string of highly suspicious deaths that strangely target a key profession in incredibly timed stages:

“You may recall that many months ago there was a spate of bankers dying under suspicious circumstances, while jogging, or “falling” (or being pushed) in front of trains, falling onto piked fences, jumping off of roofs, being shot in their cars, and so on. That pattern of strange deaths followed a spate of similar unusual deaths of so-called “homeopathic” doctors, which followed, years before that, a kill-off of biologists and geneticists, and if we want to go all the way back to the Reagan era, a spate of mysterious and suspicious deaths of high energy physicists.”

Source: AFTER A LONG HIATUS, ANOTHER SUSPICIOUS BANKER DEATH… (March 2019)

Another individual, who was a very outspoken vaccine whistleblower, and who was a former sales executive for the pharmaceutical company Merck, Brandy Vaughan, was tragically found dead in her home in December of 2020. She made numerous appeals against the push for this highly suspect vaccine, and made videos and posts urging people to investigate her death should she be found dead, especially after she was targeted and stalked for speaking out against the pharmaceutical companies.

Source: odysee | Learn the Risk | Merck Whistleblower, Brandy Vaughan, Account of Intimidation & Harassment

Now who would suffer the most if people stayed away from dangerous “medicines” and drugs, and unnecessary vaccines that do more damage than good – and instead learned how to take care of their own immune system and take care of their body through exercise, fresh air and sunlight, a healthy diet and enough sleep?

Hm… maybe… the pharmaceutical/vaccine companies – that Fauci and Bill Gates both have a vested interest in, and who have made multi-millions/billions from various drugs and vaccines.

Covid created 9 new pharma billionaires; combined wealth enough to vaccinate everyone on planet

Hm… and guess who ISN’T liable if these vaccines end up causing severe side effects or even death?…

True.
“Pharmaceutical companies are protected from liability regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. If someone has an allergic reaction or injury from one of the vaccines, they can petition to receive compensation from the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which also falls under the jurisdiction of HHS, has a better record of providing compensation to people who claim injury from a vaccine than CICP but covers vaccines for diseases such as polio and seasonal influenza, not COVID-19.”
Source: Fact Check: Are Pharmaceutical Companies Immune From COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits?

Normally I stay away from anything labeled “fact check”, but this one was scarily accurate. For more information, guess who DOES end up funding vaccine-related injuries?

We, the taxpayers.

“That’s because pandemic-related claims for vaccines will be routed to a rarely used federal program set up to encourage drugmakers to help combat public health emergencies. It spares pharmaceutical and device makers from costly liability lawsuits in exchange for taxpayers compensating injured patients — though it doesn’t guarantee there’s funding to do so.” – Drugmakers Shielded from COVID Vaccine Liability But Funds for Injury Claims in Doubt

Lovely, isn’t it? While these multi-billion dollar companies are free from financial liability, it is us, the normal everyday citizens that had no say in the development of these vaccines, to pay compensation to those who end up suffering for these pharmaceutical companies’ malpractice.

Just splendid.

One last note

Is the advent of mind-control technology so far-fetched that it’s nothing more than a “ridiculous conspiracy theory”?

Well, seeing as how DARPA has been aiming at this research for a very long time, and has been actively pursuing it, I’d say if someone still shrugs all of this data and research off, then they have already been mind-controlled.

Genetically tweaking human brains

“To do this, Robinson’s team plans to use viruses modified to deliver genetic material into cells — called viral vectors — to insert DNA into specific neurons that will make them produce two kinds of proteins.”

…

“The second protein tethers to magnetic nanoparticles, so the neurons can be magnetically stimulated to fire when the headset generates a magnetic field. This could be used to stimulate neurons so as to induce an image or sound in the patient’s mind.”

…

“The group’s plan relies on specially designed nanoparticles with magnetic cores and piezoelectric outer shells, which means the shells can convert mechanical energy to electrical and vice versa. The particles will be injected or nasally administered, and magnetic fields will guide them to specific neurons.”

Source: The Government Is Serious About Creating Mind-Controlled Weapons (article written “about 2 years ago”)

I’m not liking the sounds of this. (“Mind-Controlled WEAPONS“) Especially if taking it in relation to an article I did last month about possible nanoparticles being injected by the nasal cavity (perhaps by covid swabs?) – Strange Moving White and Black Fibers Found on Masks and Test Swabs

I can’t say exactly what’s going on. But I do know whatever this covid vaccine is, it is NEFARIOUS in purpose, and I just pray that we all get through this and start waking up to these outrageous agendas.

God bless and much love.

Important additional reading on Serge Monast and the global “non-elites” agenda:

– Silenced people, Serge Monast: Project Blue Beam (murdered)
– 1994 Serge Monast Talk Explaining NASA’s Project Blue Beam
– The controversial death of Serge Monast

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.