The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow”

“A conspiracy like this could never happen because ‘too many people would be involved’.” …

This article has been cross-posted from globalresearch.ca

Original article written by F. William Engdahl
on February 18, 2022

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @globalresearch_crg.

***

The famous short story by Edgar Allen Poe, The Purloined Letter, is apt in describing the agenda of Klaus Schwab, founder some 50 years ago of what is today the globally influential Davos World Economic Forum (WEF)–Hidden in plain sight.

Schwab published a book in 2020 titled The Great Reset, which calls on world leaders to use the “opportunity” of the COVID-19 pandemic to fundamentally reorganize the global economy into a dystopian top-down version of the technocratic UN Agenda 2030.

For those willing to do patient research, Schwab’s WEF reveals an astonishing degree of the current globalist agenda for a technocratic totalitarianism. Even more he has been developing hand-picked cadre to implement this agenda over three decades, with a select global “cadre school” for “future global leaders.”

In effect it is what we might call the Davos Conspiracy, agents promoted around the world to infiltrate top policy circles and push the sinister Davos Reset agenda.

One of the most astonishing features of the COVID pandemic fear hysteria is the degree to which politicians worldwide have followed in lockstep, along with global media and key health figures, to embrace an unprecedented agenda of economic and human destruction in the name of fighting a virus.

It turns out that most all key players all have something in common. They are hand-picked graduates or “alumni” as he calls them, of Klaus Schwab’s Davos cadre school, his annual program called Young Global Leaders and pre-2004 called Global Leaders for Tomorrow.

Since the first group of Davos cadre were selected in 1993, more than 1,400 “future global leaders” have been trained in a highly secret process which is rarely ever mentioned in the bio of Davos graduates. With the patience of a spider weaving a vast web, Klaus Schwab and his wealthy backers at the World Economic Forum have created the most influential network of policy actors in modern history, or perhaps ever.

In a 2017 video with David Gergen at Harvard, Schwab boasts of being proud that, “we penetrate the cabinets” with Davos Young Global Leader cadre. Schwab states, “I have to say then I mention names like Mrs Merkel…and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now…”

Great Reset

The Great Reset, as explained by Schwab in his co-authored June 2020 book of the same title, and elaborated in full on the website of the World Economic Forum, is there for anyone curious to discover. It lays out a program to reorganize the global economy top-down, using the COVID disruptions to push among other things a green zero carbon agenda, elimination of meat protein and traditional agriculture, an elimination of fossil fuels, air travel contraction, eliminating cash for central bank digital currencies and a totalitarian medical system of mandatory vaccinations.

In the June 2020 virtual Davos summit of global leaders, aptly titled The Great Reset, Schwab declared,

“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism… There are many reasons to pursue a Great Reset, but the most urgent is COVID-19.”

The Great Reset, he continues, requires that,

“governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies… The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.”

What Schwab does not mention is that it has been his network of Davos “global leaders” who have been at the heart of advancing the COVID draconian agenda from unnecessary lockdowns to forced vaccinations to mandatory mask.

The pandemic has been the necessary first phase of the Great Reset. Without it he would not be able to talk about fundamental global changes.

Here Schwab’s agenda is global wealth redistribution for creating the infamous UN Agenda 2030 “sustainable” economy:

“The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans. Rather than using these funds… to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.”

He adds, “The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges.”

Purloined Letter

The 1844 short story by American author Edgar Allen Poe, The Purloined Letter, tells of a stolen letter of the French Queen being used to blackmail her by an unscrupulous minister. When Paris police search the house of the suspected thief meticulously without result, a friend of the chief inspector is able to find the purloined document by looking for it, “hidden in plain sight.”

So it is with what is without doubt the most brazen and criminal conspiracy of modern times, the Davos Great Reset.

Everything is there, open for anyone with patience to wade through the pages of WEF press releases and web pages.

Notable is that the global players, the Davos “cadre” carefully chosen over the past thirty years to be groomed for positions of power to implement the Great Reset agenda, are openly named on the Davos website, found with a little patient searching. Partial lists have appeared naming a small handful of the Davos “Young Global Leaders.” A more exhaustive search of some 1400 names in the annual cadre school classes since 1992 reveals an astonishing, detailed conspiracy. The WEF website states the global leaders are “trained to be aligned with the World Economic Forum’s mission,” to “drive public-private co-operation in the global public interest.”

The following is the result of reviewing every WEF class of future global leaders since 1993.

What is most striking is that key players linked to Schwab are involved in the decisive measures that have made the COVID-19 “pandemic” the economically and physically destructive process it is. WEF alumni are in the middle of everything covid.

Davos, Gates and mRNA Vaccines

At the heart of the COVID-19 agenda is clearly the “warp speed” rollout of untested experimental mRNA gene-edited concoctions, misnamed vaccines, by two pharma companies—Pfizer (with BioNTech of Germany) and Moderna of USA.

Bill Gates (WEF 1993) and his Gates Foundation are at the heart of the mRNA gene-edited jab rollout along with Tony Fauci of the US NIAID. Gates was selected by Schwab before he had even created the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in 1993, for the first group of WEF cadre together with Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and others. Was Schwab influential in getting Gates to create the foundation?

Gates Foundation money, hundreds of millions, have in effect bought control of the corrupt UN World Health Organization, according to WHO whistleblower, Swiss epidemiologist, Astrid Stuckelberger, who in a recent interview stated,

“WHO has changed since I was there…There was a change in 2016…It was special: Non-governmental organizations – such as GAVI – Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization – led by Bill Gates – they joined the WHO in 2006 with a fund. Since then, the WHO has developed into a new type of international organization. GAVI gained more and more influence, and total immunity, more than the diplomats in the UN.“

Gates’ foundation, along with Schwab’s WEF created the global GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance in 2000.

Another infamous alumnus of the Gates WEF Global Leaders class, José Manuel Barroso (WEF 1993), –President of the European commission from 2004-2014, former head Goldman Sachs International, member of the Bilderberg Steering Committee–was named CEO of the Gates-financed GAVI vaccine alliance in January 2021, as the mRNA jabs were rolled out. Barroso now oversees global spending on the mRNA vaccines for Gates and WHO.

Albert Bourla chief executive officer of Pfizer, is a WEF Agenda Contributor. His Pfizer Vice President, Vasudha Vats (WEF 2021), is a WEF “global leader” recruit.

The other key mRNA jab maker is Moderna, whose CEO, Stéphane Bancel (WEF 2009) is another Davos alumnus. The very next year, 2010, Bancel was selected to be CEO of a new company, Moderna, in Massachusetts.

In 2016, with no successful mRNA product yet approved, Bancel’s Moderna signed a global health project framework agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases. The same year Bancel signed a global health project framework agreement with Tony Fauci and the NIAID. In a January 2018 speech to the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference, more than a year before the world heard of COVID-19 out of Wuhan China, Gates declared, “We are backing companies like CureVac and Moderna on mRNA approaches for vaccine and drug development…” Prescience?

Davos Politicians

The second key component for the Davos pandemic agenda has been an international collection of key politicians in the EU and North America especially, who have backed the most draconian lockdown and forced vaccination measures in history. Most all the key actors are Davos WEF Global Leaders.

In Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel led one of the most severe COVID lockdowns until she retired in December 2021. She was from the first 1993 WEF class. Her Health Minister, Jens Spahn (WEF 2012), was also a Davos alumnus. Spahn coerced mass mRNA jabs and pushed unnecessary lockdowns and masking. He was a former pharma lobbyist. Philipp Rösler, Minister of Health from 2009 until 2011, was appointed the WEF Managing Director by Schwab in 2014.

In December a new coalition under Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who was invited to give a Special Address to the January 2022 Davos Meeting by Schwab. Germany’s new Foreign Minister, Green leader Annalena Baerbock (WEF 2020), was chosen to be a Global Leader just prior to her becoming Chancellor candidate. Baerbock’s controversial pick as State Secretary for climate change diplomacy, Greenpeace head, Jennifer Morgan, a US citizen, is a WEF Agenda Contributor and close friend of WEF Board member Al Gore. Former German Green Party head, Cem Özdemir (WEF 2002), is new Minister of Agriculture and Nutrition.

In France President Emmanuel Macron (WEF 2016) mysteriously rose from an obscure Cabinet Minister to become President of France in 2017 with no party, just a year after being selected to join the WEF Global Leaders program. As President, Macron has instituted some of the most draconian COVID measures in the world including internal passports and mandated vaccines.

Other EU politicians from the Davos club include Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis (WEF 2003), Prime Minister, Belgium Alexander De Croo, (WEF 2015). Both have imposed severe COVID measures. Sanna Marin (WEF 2020) Prime Minister of Finland invoked a state of emergency in Finland, with severe lockdowns and other drastic measures. In the UK former Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, (WEF 1993) was named by WHO in April 2021 to promote a $60 billion program for COVID vaccination in “poor countries.” Brown became WHO Ambassador for Global Health Financing in September 2021.

In North America the Canadian government of Justin Trudeau, now subject to a massive popular revolt against his severe vaccine mandates and other measures, is riddled with Davos agents.

Trudeau himself is a Davos WEF Agenda Contributor and frequent speaker at Davos. Schwab introduced Trudeau in 2016 stating, “I couldn’t imagine anyone who could represent more the world that will come out of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.”

The key COVID actor for Trudeau is Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland who is on the WEF Board of Trustees, and leads Trudeau’s COVID response. Other WEF agents in Ottawa are Foreign Minister, Mélanie Joly (WEF 2016), Family Minister Karina Gould (WEF 2020).

In the USA top Biden Administration appointees include Jeffrey Zients (WEF 2003), White House Coronavirus Coordinator. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (WEF 2019) who suddenly announced for President after being chosen by Davos is another. US deep state operative Samantha Power (WEF 2003) is Biden’s head of USAID, the major foreign aid agency closely tied to CIA activities abroad. Rebecca Weintraub (WEF 2014) a Harvard professor who works for total vaccination of everyone in the world with mandatory vaccines even for children, is adviser to the Department of Health and Human Services’ National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

California Governor Gavin Newsom (WEF 2005) imposed some of the nation’s most severe lockdowns and mask mandates as did Jared Polis (WEF 2013) Governor of Colorado, with a public health order that made Colorado one of the first states to require proof of full vaccination to be admitted into the large indoor events.

Australia and New Zealand have been two of the world’s most severe COVID tyranny regimes. In Australia, Health Minister Greg Hunt was WEF Director of Strategy in 2001 and WEF Global Leader in 2003. He controls the extreme government COVID-19 policies. In New Zealand, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (WEF 2014) met with Bill Gates in New York in September 2019 as featured speaker at the Gates Foundation annual Sustainable Development Goals conference, just before the China COVID events and days before the October Event 201 “pandemic simulation” by World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. As Prime Minister, Ardern has imposed waves of lockdowns, removing most civil rights and virtually banned international travel.

Key Think Tanks and Academics

This is far from the extent of the carefully-cultivated and promoted Davos global network behind orchestrating global COVID-19 pandemic measures. Instrumental roles are played by the Rockefeller Foundation whose President, Rajiv Shah (WEF 2007) was a leading figure for the Africa Green Revolution at the Gates Foundation, as well as vaccine programs. As head of the influential Rockefeller Foundation Shah plays a key role promoting the Davos Great Reset where he is WEF Agenda Contributor. Another highly influential US policy think tank, the New York Council on Foreign Relations, has deep engagement in the COVID-19 agenda.

Thomas Bollyky (WEF 2013) is Director of the CFR Global Health Program and is a former Gates Foundation as well as WHO consultant. He directed the CFR Task Force, Improving Pandemic Preparedness: Lessons from COVID-19 (2020).

Jeremy Howard (WEF 2013) is an Australian who at the start of the COVID-19 organized a worldwide campaign for mandatory face masks. Mustapha Mokass (WEF 2015) developed a vaccine passport system for the Schwab 4th Industrial Revolution agenda.

Goebbels Mainstream Media

The role of managed media has been at the heart of the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic propaganda offensive. Davos and the WEF of Schwab are in the midst of this as well.

CNN is one of the most notorious propaganda outlets promoting fear and advocating the mRNA jabs while attacking any proven remedial treatment. CNN and Davos are well-connected.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta (WEF 2010), chief medical correspondent for CNN played a key role promoting the official narrative in the COVID-19 deep event. Dr. Leana Sheryle Wen (WEF 2018) is a columnist with The Washington Post and a CNN medical analyst. As a CNN ‘medical contributor’ Wen suggested that life needs to be “hard” for Americans who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine. Anderson Cooper (WEF 2008), a spooky former CIA “intern” is a major CNN host. Jeffrey Dean Zeleny (WEF 2013) is the Chief National Affairs Correspondent for CNN.

While CNN produces one-sided commentary on the mRNA jabs and COVID, highly-influential owners of social media corporations engage in unprecedented banning of any critical or contrary opinion in censorship that would make a Goebbels blush. Among them is Mark Zuckerberg (WEF 2009) the billionaire owner of CIA-backed Facebook, and Twitter board member Martha Lane Fox (WEF 2012), a member of the UK Joint Committee on National Security Strategy and on House of Lords COVID-19 Committee. Larry Page (WEF 2005) is a billionaire co-founder of Google, arguably the world’s most censored and most used search engine.

Marc Benioff (WEF Board of Trustees) billionaire owner of Time magazine and Salesforce cloud computing, is also connected to Bill Gates’s The Giving Pledge. Dawood Azami (WEF 2011) is multi-media editor at the BBC World Service, the influential UK state-owned broadcaster. Jimmy Wales (WEF 2007) is founder of Wikipedia which notoriously alters content of COVID-related entries to promote the WHO and Davos agenda. Lynn Forester de Rothschild (WEF 1995) with her third husband, Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild, owns The Economist magazine, which promotes the COVID Davos agenda along with the coming Green reset. She was introduced to Sir Evelyn by Henry Kissinger at the 1998 Bilderberg Conference in Scotland.

Other figures among the Davos stable of global future leaders include Jamie Dimon (WEF 1996), CEO JP Morgan Chase, Nathaniel Rothschild (WEF 2005) son and heir apparent to Baron Jacob Nathaniel “Nat” Rothschild. David Mayer de Rothschild (WEF 2007), a British billionaire green agenda advocate with a fortune of estimated 10 billion dollars.

WEF Strategic corporate “partners” helping mentor the Davos Global Leaders include Barclays Bank, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Deutsche Bank AG, General Motors Company, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Google Inc., HSBC Holdings Plc, McKinsey & Company and UBS AG and such.

Is this concentration of global power just coincidence or part of a genuine outright conspiracy?

A reading of the current World Economic Forum Board of Trustees might help to answer

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @globalresearch_crg. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook” where this article was originally published.

He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

*Featured image by 정훈 김 from Pixabay

Roger Waters (of Pink Floyd) Calls Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram: “Insidious Movement”

Hero standing up against the establishment.

From a widely shared Twitter post made on June 11th 2021 by La Jornada, we can see Roger Waters at a “Free Julian Assange” event, THE PEOPLES FORUM, raising donations to bring awareness to his unfair imprisonment. In the background of the video, we can see the saying, “Journalism is not a crime – war crimes are.”

[NOTE: I did attempt to visit the site that is posted on the banner “standwithassangenewyork.org” but nothing shows up. There is, however, a twitter page similar to this name: StandWithAssangeNY | @AssanageNY]

Fittingly, Roger Waters took this opportunity to showcase his disdain for the monopolistic efforts of big tech to gain even more control over the population than they already have.

In the video below, Roger Waters reveals a request from Mark Zuckerberg / Instagram asking permission to use Pink Floyd’s song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” for their Instagram movie. Waters’ response to Zuckerberg is astounding, since he is one of a small few speaking out against social media censorship.

Roger Waters calling out Zuckerberg and Facebook/Instagram as a corrupt industry and refusing to be a part of their system:

“This is something that I actually put in my folder when I came out here today. You have no idea what it is. Nobody does. Because it arrived on the internet to me this morning. It’s a request for the rights to use my song “Another Brick in the Wall 2” in the making of a film to promote instagram. So it’s a missive… it’s a missive from Mark Zuckerberg to me, right? It arrived this morning. With an offer of a huge, huge amount of money. And the answer is: “F*ck you! No f*cking way!”

And I, I only mention that because this is an insidious, it’s the insidious movement of them to take over absolutely everything. You know? So those of us who do have any power, and I do have a little bit, in terms of the control of the publishing of my songs, I do anyway – So I will not be a party to this bullsh*t, Zuckerberg.

Roger Waters reading from the missive: “We want to thank you for considering this project. We feel that the core sentiment of this song is still so prevalent and necessary today, which speaks to how timeless a work [it is]” – it’s true.

And yet, they want to, they want to subjourn it; they want to use it, to make facebook and instagram even bigger and more powerful than it already is, so that it can continue to censor all of us in this room! And prevent this story about Julian Assange getting out to the general public, so the general public can go, “What?! What?” No! No more. Nada mas.”

“Zuckerberg features in my new rock and roll show. I’ve got him sitting – no, I shouldn’t tell you. But, but he does. But you think, how does this little prick, who started off saying, She’s pretty. We’ll give her a four out of five. She’s ugly, we’ll give her a one.”

How the f*ck did he get any power in anything? And yet, here he is, one of the most powerful idiots in the world.”

This is amazing. This is what the world needs more of, instead of people who are easily bought off and paid for, and who constantly bow their heads and do whatever the establishment tells them to do.

Roger Waters is a shining example of someone who stands up and defends the people, instead of falling in line and following the narrative. Even after being offered a substantial amount of money, Waters tells them, “not a chance”.

This is dignity, people. This is integrity. He is speaking out not only for himself, but for the rest of us; standing up against this tyrannical control and censorship. How many people have been deleted, banned, censored, simply for not following the main narrative? And how ironic, when the lyrics Zuckerberg and the big tech giants wants to use is, in part: “We don’t need no thought control.”

The nerve, right? A huge, totalitarian dictatorship, monitoring certain narratives across the platform, labeling numerous posts as “misinformation” and “this post is disputed”, and “due to what we deem as hate speech (which is anything that we don’t like), your account has been banned” has the audacity to want to use a song that was created to fight back against “thought control”.

It pretty much sums up what facebook, instagram, twitter and other huge tech platforms are all about. Their purpose to organize a large, oppressive “group think” to control the thoughts of others and anyone who dissents from their agenda gets ostracized, shunned, banned, etc.

Thankfully, there are still people who resist this corruption, even at the cost of further monetary gain and fame. Thank you so much to Roger Waters, for being the voice of reason and shutting down this huge oligarch’s attempts at abusing this song and exploiting its meaning. This is the action of a role model. Not the corrupted individuals who are trying to indoctrinate and condition the minds of the population.

One Final Note:

On the matter of Mr. Julian Assange, it’s also fascinating how instead of hailing whistleblowers exposing crimes as heroes, they are instead investigated and accused of crimes themselves, for obtaining materials “illegally” or for breaking NDAs.

Of course, where is the outrage for the ACTUAL CRIMINALS being exposed for their crimes? Why do the efforts of the media aim to smear the whistleblower instead of reporting on the atrocities being committed? And why should NDAs protect criminals or criminal activity? If a crime is being committed, that should make the NDA null and void. It would seem as if the NDA is there solely to protect any kind of criminal activity that may be perpetrated. A crime is still a crime, NDA or not. Any NDA issued that results in protecting illegal activity should be overthrown and cancelled.

It’s fascinating when telling the truth and exposing crimes is considered an even bigger crime than the crime itself. Perhaps it all boils down to who was initially committing the crime to begin with…

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”

The Dead are Rising to Share Their Views, to Vote, and Get Covid Tested

Even the Dead are not Safe from Propaganda

Yes, folks. We are apparently living in a time where the dead are allowed to come back to life in order to share their views (as long as it fits a certain narrative, of course) and vote (only for a particular candidate, of course) and get tested (positive for Covid, of course).

These are certainly interesting times, when even people who are alive that have a difference of opinion to the mainstream, are being shut out, censored, ridiculed and smeared.

Yet, for some reason, a voice was given to those who have passed away. I did not realize that the passion that these people have to get their points across could reach through the scientific barrier of conscious limitations and access the world of the living.

But here we are.

Perhaps in a world so filled with electricity and technology, their electromagnetic pulses were amplified, which gave them an ability to infiltrate the computerized systems of today’s age. Who knows? It’s not like someone is deliberately using these poor deceased individual’s names to further a certain agenda and enforce a certain conformity upon the rest of the population, right?

No, no. It’s more likely that these souls that have passed away decided that those of us that are still living needed more guidance and direction in the way that we’re heading, and in their utmost concern must have come back to help us make that decision by participating in the voting system, and/or getting tested for covid. Which is what allegedly happened to Troy Whittington’s Mom.

Here is Troy’s account on what happened, and a few other examples of the boundaries that the “dead” have crossed in order to make their statements…

Sandra Ann Whittington

Imagine Troy Whittington’s shock and dismay when he opened up a letter dated August 20, 2020, from the Shelby County Health Department that stated that his mother, Sandra Ann Whittington, tested positive for covid. It must have been quite the reaction, seeing as how his mother passed away on February 16, 2020.

When Troy called the Health Department to get answers, he was told that she took the test on June 20th. The lady he spoke with did not have any answers for him at the time, and told him that she would have to check in with her supervisor to provide any more information.

Troy also raises a few other good points on this egregious error:

“I would just like for the health department to be more accurate.” He added, “They have a record of her death there. That is where I got the death certificate from and it’s in the same building they’re sending out saying she is positive, which is not possible.”

Whittington also would like to point out, if his mom had been alive and tested positive, why did it take so long for the notification to go out?

“We’re talking two months later. She needs to be quarantined for 10, well we’ve got 60 days from the time of the test to get the letter out to her which is unacceptable,” said Whittington.

wkyc.com

I definitely don’t mean to make light of the situation, but if Mrs. Whittaker was walking around somehow (even after being cremated), and went to get a covid test – which she was positive for – then she was still walking around for 2 months, allegedly without being quarantined, before she got her positive results back. …By that time the coronavirus would have run its course, and everyone she was in contact with in the meantime could have been exposed to this virus.

Now, of course with anything, one should always use critical thinking skills to try and determine the different possibilities on how this came about, so I can offer up a few:

–  The most common would be a simple clerical error. More common than one would think. Perhaps someone with a name similar to that of Sandra Ann Whittington’s indeed went to get tested for the covid, and the clerk pulled up this particular Sandra’s name by mistake. It’s an easy error to make and I can see it happening. However, when dealing with a serious matter such as this, all necessary precautions should be taking place to avoid this possibility. (and that still wouldn’t account for the unnecessarily long wait time that the patient would have waited for the test results to come back. …Unless that was due to another clerical error as well.)

– An unfortunate glitch in the system. (Not the Matrix system… the computer system. Although for all conspiracy theory lovers out there, this is one that could be speculated upon.) This could happen as well, I would surmise. Not as likely, but possible nonetheless.

– This is a deliberate attempt to use deceased people’s names to rank the amount of positive covid results up. The likelihood of someone finding out that a deceased person’s name is on a “confidential” database is pretty low, and the amount of positive cases in a medical facility will perhaps boost funding, as has been described happening in numerous different outlets.

There are many more different possibilities than these, of course, but wanted to mention a few just off the top of my head.

There is also the reason that Alisa Haushalter gave to Troy Whittington, although even with that, it’s not as comforting or understandable as one would think:

According to the letter Director Haushalter sent to Whittington, “There were internal procedures regarding post-mortem testing by the Tennessee Department of Health that resulted in a positive test being reported to the Shelby County Health Department. Subsequently, the Shelby County Health Department issued the letter and you should not have received the letter.”

wthr.com

This seems very suspicious to me. Perhaps because I have a very cynical mind at times, this could indicate that the post-mortem testing was done for the sole purpose of finding “positive” covid cases from the deceased, so that they could send in these numbers to the CDC. After all, the letter states that Whittington “should not have received the letter” and instead should have just gone to the CDC.

Then, to make matters even worse, upon following up with the “initial testing”, found that Sandra Whittington had a “false positive”, so therefore did not have covid at all. …Well, that’s comforting, I guess. Or not, seeing as how if the tests are this unreliable, how do we determine which test was the legitimate one and which was showing false results?

I digress.

I guess the fact of the matter is, dear Sandra Ann Whittington did not come back from the dead after all to administer to a covid test. Although she did apparently donate her body to science, so I guess in a way she did.

Well, I guess that’s one theory busted. At least in Sandra Whittington’s case. But we still have a few more instances in which I can show that the dead really did come back to announce their views.

Patty Duke (Anna Marie Duke / Anna Pearce)

Some may remember Patty Duke from, well, The Patty Duke Show. She also had quite the filmography as seen here imdb.com.

Unfortunately, she passed away on March 29, 2016 from sepsis, but that didn’t stop her from supporting the FCC agenda to end net neutrality (three separate times: May 24, 2017 / August 7, 2017 / August 8, 2017 …Oh wait. Hold up. At least 4 separate times. This one appearing under the name “Anna Pearce”, for August 7, 2017.)

Tweets showing proof of Patty Duke's messages in support of ending net neutrality.

FCC Published Fake Comments by Dead Actor Patty Duke, Sean Astin’s Mother, Supporting End of Net Neutrality

Mackenzie Astin brought the attention of this outrageous fiasco out on twitter, calling out to the FCC and Ajit Pai to investigate how this happened.

Shockingly, he wasn’t the only one who had questions.

Not only did we have a case of a deceased person being extremely concerned with net neutrality, so much so that they had to file 4 separate forms to announce their opinions, but we also have cases of living people who are apparently leaving comments to the FCC government site without any recollection of having doing so.

Now, I’m not going to pretend to know everything about the FCC and the net neutrality aspect and regulations, because honestly it confuses the he11 out of me. If there’s anything I do know, it’s that you can’t trust politicians people, and people will often twist their words in order to make something unappealing, appealing. Or vice versa. (Or they’ll just flat out lie.)

So my issue with this is not about the whole Obama administration, or Thomas Wheeler, Ajit Pai, or who is for what and who is against what and such in regards to net neutrality, but it is to look at the deceptive tactics that are being used in order to push for a certain outcome.

The fact that not only are there multiple deceased people leaving comments on a government website in support of or in opposition of a certain bill, there are also accounts of plenty of living people who are being used, without their knowledge, to administer to a specific point of view.

Take the cases of Senator Jeff Merkley and Senator Pat Toomey. Both of their names were used, allegedly without their knowledge, in order to support ending net neutrality.

This is a fun case, because it’s very rare when you have two people on the opposite side of the spectrum, one a Democrat, the other a Republican, actually coming together to tackle a common cause.

Jeff Merkley

Now even though it appears as if Pat Toomey is in support of ending net neutrality, at least he can agree upon the fact the subterfuge and manipulation enacted upon this particular bill with the usage of multiple people’s accounts (fake, live, dead, or otherwise) is a “deliberate misuse of Americans’ personal information”:

“The federal rulemaking process is an essential part of our democracy and allows Americans the opportunity to express their opinions on how government agencies decide important regulatory issues,” their letter said. “As such, we are concerned about the aforementioned fraudulent activity. We need to prevent the deliberate misuse of Americans’ personal information and ensure that the FCC is working to protect against current and future vulnerabilities in its system.”
washingtontimes.com

We finally get some answers on this blatant attempt at ending net neutrality, but not before some interesting confusion about an apparent false DDoS attack on the servers.

Further citation from cnet.com alludes to the Russians being the culprit:

This site: pewresearch.org, breaks down the statistics on how often each comment was used, and the numbers of times it was submitted by certain various names. It is eye-opening, and should serve as a reminder to us all about the dangers and misrepresentation we could be seeing online on a day-to-day basis, even from those friends’ and families’ accounts we think we know (or our very own accounts…). It is also a reminder to us all that those we think are gone, still live on, apparently, and use their presence to try and sway the public opinion on matters of business preference…

It makes one wonder how often this very deceptive tactic has been used, not just in this arena, but in many others.

Which brings me to –

The Presidential Election

It’s no secret anymore. Dead people vote. If we could all just unite instead of constantly being divided, then we can come to the unanimous decision that Dead Lives Matter too, and we should respect their decision.

So what if an overwhelming amount of them “allegedly” voted Democrat this year?

MuhahahahahahahahahaMAD says

Did you hear about the Chicago Republican who died?
He votes Democrat now.

After all, Joe Biden’s whole campaign program encompasses the “battle for the souls of the nation” and “souls to the polls”. And since we know what kind of turnout he received at his actual speeches (whether they were “invite only” and/or “from your car because of social distancing” or not), there is no argument that Trump’s turnout trumped his. But perhaps that’s because the eyes of the living couldn’t see all the dead people apparently at Joe Biden’s campaigns.

And, as we saw with the results of the voting, it looks like Mr. Biden got his wish. It seems as if numerous souls who have crossed over couldn’t help themselves as their adoration for Joe must have been so expansive, that their souls have literally transcended time and space to vote. Even if they died before this election; or even before Mr. Trump’s entire presidency, for that matter.

Records show that the elections board received an absentee ballot from a Frances Reckhow of Staten Island, a registered Democrat.

The BOE mailed an absentee ballot “requested” by Frances M. Reckhow of Bedell Avenue on Sept. 24.

But there’s a problem: Frances Reckhow, who was born on July 6, 1915, and would be 105 today, died in 2012, according to an obituary filed with the Staten Island Advance.

Despite dying 8 years ago, Reckhow supposedly mailed the ballot back on Oct. 6 and the BOE received it and declared it valid on Oct. 8, tracking records show.

nworeport.me

And this article: Whistleblower Leaks Photo Of Dead People Born In The Year 1900 Voting In 2020 Presidential Election, alludes to the fact that numerous dead people were manually entered for an election poll queue program.

This, to be honest, is outrageous.

Are they implying that 100+ old people are obviously dead and can’t vote? Did these people manually check each person and make sure that they are physically dead, or did they just assume that because of their age? And even if they are dead, then what? They’re not allowed to vote?

This sounds to me like discrimination.

I thought, we, as a “united” nation, and working to be inclusive, can look beyond their “living capacity” and allow them their own opinion. (Well, seeing as how we can’t even do that with the living, I suppose it’s no wonder.)

The actions of “dead voters” have raised the eyebrows of many, and the allegations of voter fraud have run rampant this year. Many speculating that the democrats have rigged the election.

Tucker Carlson: Yes, dead people voted in this election and Democrats helped make it happen
Officials stop scheme to register dead voters as Democrats
Thousands of Dead People Voting In PA: 100% For Biden – (Now, I wanted to point out that this headline is 100% misleading. While I do think that there was fraudulent activity going on behind this election, and that the democrats are by no means completely innocent in this scheme, and even if this title is 100% true, there is nothing in this article that can prove it. I specifically sought out an article like this one so that I can assess it and see if there was actual proof that these votes were being cast for Biden, specifically. There wasn’t any.
So again, please be aware of any type of misleading news. I decided to keep the article here, however, because I enjoyed the youtube video by Fleccas Talks (which is legitimate and not misleading) that it featured and wanted to show you how easy it is to be side-tracked by a title, especially if it aligns with the same view as you.)

Having said all of this, we can’t forget a couple of choice quotes from Mr. Joe Biden either:

youtube.com/GOP War Room (I’m not sure how long this video will stay up, but it’s fun while it lasts. If this video gets removed, please let me know and I will replace it.)

“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” – Joe Biden

Who is Joe Biden talking to in this campaign? Is he talking to the fellow democrats that have helped him rig this election? The people in the audience? His campaign members?

Obviously not. We all know by now that he’s talking to the ghostly souls in the audience that are overwhelming in number but that none of us can see. Come on people. Think.

youtube.com/The News Junkie’s Cartoons (Again, please let me know if this video gets removed and I will replace it.)

“Folks, we got a lotta work to do. I don’t need you to get me elected; I need you once I’m elected.” – Joe Biden

I know you don’t need us living, breathing souls to get you elected, since you’re using the dead’s apparent passion for a democratic election this year to do your work for you. But you need us once you are elected to do all of the heavy lifting, since we all know that ghosts can mostly just interfere with electronics and lightweight objects such as mail-in ballots, and not so much with the physical labor.

I’m onto you, Joe. I’m onto you.

Now, before you think dead people can’t speak for themselves, I have to leave you with Facebook’s own “Legacy Contact“.
Facebook's Legacy Contact

I mean, this completely sounds legit. It’s not like Facebook has been known to run tests or experiments on its own users or anything: Facebook is way Creepier than we Thought

And it’s not like Mark Zuckerberg thinks we’re all idiots for using Facebook, right?
“They trust me. Dumb fvck$” (Mark’s words, not mine.)

Sure, sure, he was only 19 when he made that comment, and he claims to Jose Antonio Vargas, “I think I’ve grown and learned a lot” since he made those statements.

But then we have this lovely tidbit that Mark Zuckerberg is at least admitting it’s for research, and hey! he’s even willing to pay “select members” money for opting in on the experiment: Facebook will pay users to log off before 2020 election

To assess the impact of social media on voting, the company will pay selected members up to $120 to deactivate their accounts beginning at the end of September.
nypost.com

It’s in the name of reasearch!

So of course it’s okay to manipulate and use subterfuge to experiment once again on the many unwitting Facebook users during and specifically concerning the election. One of the most important events of American heritage. (At least until people realize that the election/voting process is nothing more than an illusion… but this is not the time or place to discuss this particular speculation. Moving on!)

So, you know, to imply that Facebook would do anything nefarious to these “Legacy Contact” pages and perhaps leave dead people’s accounts running on bots/AI or anything of the like, is a grievous offense and I am appalled that such a theory is even considered about the good name of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and his colleagues.

Oh… I’m the one making these silly theories? Well, my opinion still stands. It makes more sense to ignore all of these suspicious activities and just trust blindly to mega-corporations that make billions of dollars at our expense.

And, apparently, milking the dead for all they’re worth too.

Fact checking is extremely important. I want to reiterate not to take everything at face value; no matter what you read, where you read it from, or who you hear it from. And to be clear, do not rely on “fact checking” websites to give you accurate information either. These are just as likely, (if not even more likely…), to feed false information and false debunking accounts to manipulate the reader. Please take everything into consideration before adhering to a certain narrative – and always keep your mind open to other possibilities.

Fair use disclaimer: Some of the links from this article are provided from different sources/sites to give the reader extra information and cite the sources, but does not necessarily mean that I endorse the contents of the site itself. Additionally, I have tried to provide links to the contents that I used from other sites as an educational and/or entertainment means only; if you feel that any information deserves further citation or request to be clarified, please let me know through the contact page.

Get an Earful

DARPA BRAIN Initiative – Inhumane Experimentations Using Fusion Centers and Electromagnetic Fields to Control & Torture People - "If they want to experiment on you, by the thousands, they will. And you can be driven to insanity and death"
The “FEW” Involved in the “WEF” | Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy. Klaus Schwab’s “Global Leaders of Tomorrow” - "A conspiracy like this could never happen because 'too many people would be involved'." ...
Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” Panel: Renowned Doctors and Medical Experts Discuss Medical Tyranny and Vaccine Injuries/Deaths (Highlight Video – FULL TRANSCRIPT) - Dr. Pierre Kory: "And that’s what I wanted us to be clear that we’re calling attention to today. This is corruption! Plain and simple, it’s corruption!”